Oak Knoll Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 220 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 37.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 110.7 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a history of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) with several episodes of choking which required nursing staff to perform the Heimlich Maneuver (a first-aid procedure for dislodging an obstruction from a person's windpipe in which sudden strong pressure is applied on the abdomen, between the navel and the rib cage), the Facility failed to ensure his/her Dysphagia Care Plan was reviewed and/or revised related to effectiveness of interventions, when he/she remained on the same diet but continued to experience choking episodes and despite recommendations from Speech Therapy to implement a new intervention for direct supervision by staff during all meals, he/she was only supervised from a distance by staff. On 5/02/25, Resident #1 choked on his/her meal and died. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy, titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, with a revision date of March 2022, included the following: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a history of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), was identified to be at increased risk for aspiration, with multiple choking episodes which required the nursing staff to perform the Heimlich Maneuver (a first-aid procedure for dislodging an obstruction from a person's windpipe in which sudden strong pressure is applied on the abdomen, between the navel and the rib cage), and for whom Speech Therapy had recommended the need for direct supervision by nursing staff while eating, the Facility failed to ensure they provided an adequate level of staff supervision for Resident #1 in an effort to maintain a safe environment, when on 5/02/25, he/she choked again on his/her meal, and although nursing staff performed the Heimlich Maneuver, Resident #1 died. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy, titled Accidents and Incidents, with a revision date of April 2024 included the following: -It is the policy of the Facility to provide a safe and healthful work environment. -Definition of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to adhere to infection control and prevention standards related to multi-resident medical equipment use for one Unit (Sub Acute) out of two units observed, to mitigate the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. ensure that facility staff cleaned and disinfected a blood glucose monitor (BGM - device used to measure the amount of glucose [sugar] in the blood) between multi-resident use after Nurse #2 used the BGM to obtain finger stick blood sugar (FSBS) levels on two residents and before storing the BGM device in the medication cart with clean equipment.2. ensure the facility staff cleaned and disinfected a wrist blood pressure cuff (machine used to check blood pressure) between multi-resident use when Nurse #2 used the wrist blood pressure cuff to obtain blood pressure readings on three residents, placed the wrist blood pressure cuff in her pocket after use on the three residents, and placed the contaminated device on the surface of the medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately execute Advance Directives (legal documents that provide instructions for medical care and only go into effect if you are unable to communicate your own wishes) for one Resident (#94) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, for Resident #94, the facility failed to ensure that the MOLST (Massachusetts Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form was valid and reflected the signature of Resident #94's invoked (made active by a Physician) Health Care Proxy (HCP- the person chosen as the healthcare decision maker when the individual is unable to do so for themself). Findings include: Review of the facility policy for Advance Directives, last revised February 2022, indicated: -capacity to make health care decisions is the ability to understand and appreciate the nature and consequences of health care decisions, including the benefits and risks of and alternatives to any proposed health care, and to reach an informed decision. -In Massachusetts, the determination of a patient's lack…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#98), was free from physical restraints, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, for Resident #98, the facility failed to: -appropriately assess and re-assess the use and need of wedge cushions (a triangular shaped cushion used to aid in positioning for health issues or comfort) as a restraint that was being used in the place of an ordered scoop mattress (a mattress with raised edges on all four sides to prevent accidental rolling out of bed). -obtain informed consent and review the risk/benefits with the Resident's Representative for the use of wedge cushions while the Resident was in bed to prevent him/her from exiting the bed, increasing the potential risk of accidental falls and injury. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Guidelines for the Use of a Restraint, revised 11/2016, indicated it was the policy of the facility to provide care and services to assist each resident to attain and maintain his/her highest practicable well-being in an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted within 14 days after the completion date for 17 Residents (#4, #43, #57, #90, #95, #102, #103, #18, #51, #54, #65, #80, #81, #82, #100, #116, and #118) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that: 1) Comprehensive MDS assessments for Resident's #4, #43, #57, #90, #95, #102, #103 were not submitted late with submission dates more than 14 days after the completion date. 2) Non comprehensive MDS assessments for Residents #18, #51, #54, #65, #80, #81, #82, #100, #116, and #118 were not submitted late with submission dates more than 14 days after the completion date. Findings include: Review of The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) MDS 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual dated October 2024, indicated: -Comprehensive assessments (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA)-required comprehensive assessments include the completion of both the MDS Assessment and the Care Area Assessment (CAA) process, as well…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Preadmission and Resident Review Level I (initial PASRR - initial pre-screening completed prior to admission to a Nursing Facility that assess for Serious Mental Illness[SMI] or Developmental Disabilities[DD]) screen was completed prior to admission to the facility for one Resident (#85), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: Resident #85 was admitted to the facility in April 2023, with diagnoses including Major Depressive Disorder (symptoms lasting greater than two weeks of a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities that a person used to enjoy) and Psychotic Disorder (serious mental disorders characterized by a disconnection from reality which results in strange behaviors often accompanied by disturbances of thought [excessive suspiciousness, guilt] and perception [hearing voices, seeing things, feeling things] with hallucinations [an experience involving the apparent perception of something not present]). Review of the PASRR Level I Screening, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Mental Health Authority for a Resident Review (person-centered assessment taking into account all relevant information) after a significant change in mental condition occurred for one Resident (#98), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to request a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Level II screen (PASRR- an evaluation done to determine if a resident has an intellectual or developmental disability and/or serious mental illness [SMI] and if a Resident is in need of additional specialized support services at the facility) after Resident #98 received emergency mental health interventions and was transferred to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. Findings include: Resident #98 was admitted to the facility in May 2024, with diagnoses including Severe Dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life) with agitation, Adjustment Disorder (a disorder characterized by a group of symptoms such as stress, anxiety, feeling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide treatments in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#78) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement and perform care and treatment consistent with the Physician orders and professional standards of practice for a Resident with Diabetes Type II (DM II- a chronic medical condition where the body cannot effectively use insulin [hormone that regulates blood glucose/sugar] or produce enough insulin and has trouble controlling blood sugar levels), placing the Resident at risk for side effects of hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). Findings include: Review of the National Library of Medicine document titled, Management of Diabetes and Hyperglycemia in hospitalized Patients, dated October 2024, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279093/ indicated: -hyperglycemia . is defined as blood glucose greater than 140 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter) -for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for two Residents (#87 and #24), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #87, routinely maintain the oxygen concentrator (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen) air intake gross particle filter in accordance with Physician orders and manufacturers guidelines, placing Resident #87 at risk for equipment malfunction, impaired oxygen delivery and contamination. 2. For Resident #24, ensure that the Resident had an active Physician's order for nebulizer (delivery device used to administer medication in the form of an aerosol that is inhaled into the lungs) equipment care, handling, and storage, to prevent contamination and the spread of infections. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen and Respiratory Equipment Management, dated September 2009,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that professional standards of practice relative to dialysis (the process of cleansing the blood by passing it through a special machine, necessary when the kidneys are unable to filter the blood) care and services for one Resident (#32), of two applicable residents reviewed for dialysis, out of a total sample of 23 Residents. Specifically, for Resident #32, the facility failed to: 1. Monitor and assess the Physician's ordered fluid restriction to ensure adequate fluid intake. 2. Provide food items prior to dialysis as indicated in the plan of care and per the Resident's preferences. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Guidelines for Initiating, Maintaining, and Removing Residents from Intake & Output Recording, dated 1/2016, indicated the following: -It is the policy of this facility to monitor the intake and output of residents as needed based on the resident's clinical condition and physician orders. -Conditions for which a resident must be put on I & O (intake and output) include the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#84), out of a total sample of 23 residents, was free from the risks of side effects resulting from the unnecessary use of psychotropic medications. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate monitoring for adverse consequences and side effects of antipsychotic medications using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment (a rating scale used to measure involuntary movements of the face, mouth, trunk, or limbs known as Tardive Dyskinesia (TD) in a resident taking antipsychotic medications) was completed timely in accordance with standards of practice. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Guidelines for Completing AIMS Testing, revised 10/2019, indicated: -All residents receiving antipsychotics (neuroleptics) will have an AIMS test completed prior to initiation of the medication and at least every six (6) months thereafter to monitor for movement disorder. -The AIMS aids in early detection of tardive dyskinesia as well as provides a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$211,819 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $211,819 — penalty dated 2025-06-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATLAS HEALTHCARE — 29 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA