No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rossville Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

6600 Ridge Road, Baltimore, MD 21237 · For profit - Partnership · 172 certified beds · (410) 574-4950 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$198,937 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (73) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $198,937 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-15)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1232 Race Rd · (410) 574-0077 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8665 Philadelphia Rd · (410) 574-4766 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8767 Philadelphia Rd · (410) 574-4995 · Call to confirm hours
Park
8700 Philadelphia Rd · (410) 682-9637 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.0%20.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.7%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.9%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.0%22.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.9%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%5.9%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.4%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.2%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.2%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.5%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.731.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.121.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 358 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 179 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.9%CMS range 54.7–65.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.3%CMS range 10.1–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.6–9.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.77
RN hours/ resident / day
0.73
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.63
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.69
RN hoursweekends
42.7%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 172 beds and averages 165.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.63 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-21)
32
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-02)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

73 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of a complaint, medical records, interviews, and facility investigative documents, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system to prevent 2 residents with cognitive impairment, exit-seeking behavior, and an assessed risk for elopement from leaving the facility without appropriate supervision. This failure placed both residents at risk for harm due to hazards, including no sidewalk, which forced them into a road, which led them to a heavily traveled road and one resident not being properly dressed. These actions resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (cited as past non-compliance). This was evident for 2 (Resident #6, #7) out of 8 residents reviewed for elopement/wandering risk during a complaint survey.The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident prior to the start of this survey. The facility's plan and action were verified during this survey; therefore, this deficiency was found to be past noncompliance with a compliance date of 4/23/26.The findings include:On 5/11/26 at 8:30 AM a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-02 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records and other pertinent documentation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that a resident's wishes regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were clearly and accurately communicated to facility staff. This was found to be evident for 3 out of 7 residents reviewed for advance directives or death. (#184, #53, and #91) This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #184. The findings include: Review of Resident #184's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility secondary to the initiation of hemodialysis. The resident's diagnosis included but was not limited to, chronic kidney disease, heart disease, high blood pressure and diabetes. The resident was less than [AGE] years old at the time of admission, was cognitively intact as evidenced by a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15/15, and was his/her own responsible party. Review of the electronic health record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility self report MD00181520 investigation documentation, medical records, observations, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skills to access a permacath for the IV administration of antibiotics. This was found to be evident for 1 (#184) of 2 residents reviewed for death during the survey. This deficient practice led to an immediate jeopardy for Resident #184. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident. The facility's plan and action were verified during this survey, therefore this deficiency will be cited as past noncompliance. The date of correction was 8/14/22. The findings include: Review of Resident #184's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility secondary to the initiation of hemodialysis. The resident's diagnoses included but was not limited to, chronic kidney disease, heart disease, high blood pressure, blindness, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2024-02-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with an environment that was free from abuse. Due to this deficient practice Resident #505 suffered physical and psychosocial harm. This was evident for 1 (MD00204162) of 2 facility reported incidents of abuse. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) is a standardized test used to get a quick snapshot of cognitive function and is a required screening tool used in nursing homes to assess cognition. A score of 13-15 points indicates intact cognition, 8-12 points indicates moderately impaired cognition, and 0-7 points indicates severely impaired cognition. A medical record review for Resident #505 on 4/25/24 at 9:39 AM revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-15 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on documentation review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nurse aide competency training occurred no less than 12 hours per year as determined in nurse aides' performance reviews. This was evident for 5 of 5 personnel files reviewed during the complaint survey.The findings include: On 5/15/26 at 10:30 AM a review was conducted of Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) personnel files. A review of GNA #25's personnel file revealed GNA #25 was hired on 9/29/21. There was no evidence found that the required 12-hour yearly training was done within the past 12 months. A review of GNA #26's personnel file revealed GNA #26 was hired on 2/3/22. There was no evidence found that the required 12-hour yearly training was done within the past 12 months. A review of GNA #27's personnel file revealed GNA #27 was hired on 4/13/22. There was no evidence found that the required 12-hour yearly training was done within the past 12 months. A review of GNA #28's personnel file revealed GNA #28 was hired on 5/20/24. There was documentation that on 5/20/24 the 12-hour yearly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure residents had a curtain to maintain privacy during care. This was evident for 2 (Resident #10 and #13) of 25 residents observed during a complaint survey.The findings include:Observation of Resident #10 on 5/12/26 at 8:02 AM revealed no privacy curtain between the Resident and his/her roommate (Resident #13). At that time the Surveyor asked the Resident how long the curtain had been missing and the Resident stated, quite some time. The Resident was asked if he/she would like to have a privacy curtain and the Resident stated yes.Review of Resident #10's medical record on 5/12/26 revealed the Resident was assessed by facility staff to be dependent for care on the 3/19/26 MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment Section GG0130 Functional Abilities/Self Care.On 5/12/26 at 8:40 AM, the Surveyor brought Unit Manager (UM) #11 to Resident #10 and #13's room. At that time UM #11 confirmed there was no privacy curtain between Resident #10 and #13. UM #11 confirmed at that time Resident #10 is dependent for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, facility documentation review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an effective grievance system for residents. This was evident for 1 (Resident #10) of 4 residents reviewed for complaints during a complaint survey. The findings include:Review of Resident #10's medical record on 5/11/26 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in 2014.During interview with Resident #10's RP (Resident Representative) on 5/11/26 at 10:14 AM, the RP stated he/she came into visit the Resident on Christmas day in the afternoon. At that time the Resident was lying in a soiled diaper that was leaking on his/her resident gown. The RP stated he/she wrote up a grievance regarding the incident and personally handed it to the Administrator a few days later since the grievance contained names of staff working on Christmas day. The RP stated he/she has had no resolution to that grievance.Further review of Resident #10's medical record on 5/12/26 revealed the Resident was assessed by facility staff to be dependent for care on the 3/19/26 MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on complaint, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to report an incident of elopement to the state survey agency, the Office of Health Care Quality. This was evident for 2 (Resident #6, #7) of 8 residents reviewed for elopement during the complaint survey.The findings include: On 5/11/26 at 8:30 AM a review of complaint 2988135 alleged on 4/16/26 at 5:51 PM a passerby stated that Resident #6 had a fall while pushing someone in a wheelchair (Resident #7). Resident #6 and Resident #7 were located on a sidewalk next to a closed restaurant on the corner of a heavily traveled road. This location was down the street from the facility. The complaint alleged Resident #7 was rambling incoherently and that Resident #6 had minor skin tears on the left leg. Resident #7 was observed standing behind the wheelchair, not wearing pants, and wearing only hospital-style grip socks. On 5/11/26 at 8:31 AM a review of Resident #6's medical record was conducted. Review of a 4/13/26 at 18:19 (6:19 PM) progress note for Resident #6 documented, wanderguard applied…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 3 (#6, #2, #17) of 24 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident.1)On 5/11/26 at 8:30 AM a review of Resident #6's medical record was conducted. A review of Resident #6's March 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented Resident #6 received Cyanocobalamin Solution 1000 mcg/ml injection on 3/28/26. The medication is a synthetic form of Vitamin B12 which is used to treat and prevent Vitamin B12 deficiency, which can cause severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to 1) assess a resident's wounds weekly to include measurements and 2) failed to follow wound care provider's orders for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #8) of 3 residents reviewed for wound care during a complaint survey.The findings include:Review of Resident #8's medical record on 5/11/26 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in January 2026 from the hospital with a diagnosis to include peripheral vascular disease (PVD). PVD is a slow and progressive circulation disorder characterized by narrowing, blockage or spasms in blood vessels, commonly affecting the legs. Review of the Resident's hospital discharge summary revealed the Resident had a wound from a right 4th toe amputation. Further review of Resident #8's medical record revealed on admission the facility staff assessed the Resident to also have a right heel wound.1)The facility staff failed to do a weekly assessment with measurements of Resident #8's wounds.Further review of Resident #8's medical record revealed the Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on complaint, medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 3 (#6, #7, #10) of 10 residents reviewed for complaints during a complaint survey. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1) On 5/11/26 at 8:30 AM a review of complaint 2988135 stated on 4/16/26 at 5:51 PM a passerby stated that Resident #6 had a fall while pushing someone in a wheelchair (Resident #7). Resident #6 and Resident #7 were located on a sidewalk next to a closed restaurant on the corner of a heavily traveled road. This location was down the street from the facility. The complaint alleged Resident #7 was rambling incoherently and that Resident #6 had minor skin tears on the left leg.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary manner. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:On 11/17/2025 at 7:31AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen an observation of Staff #1 (Dietary Supervisor) and Staff #2 (Dietary aid) were observed in the tray line serving food on breakfast plates with no hair net. On 11/17/2025 at 7:40AM, during an interview with Staff #1(Dietary supervisor) confirmed that both she and Staff #2 were not wearing hair nets. Staff #1 acknowledged that staff working on the tray line, who handle food, should be wearing hair nets. The Dietary Supervisor was made aware of the concern at this time.On 11/21/2025 at 3:30 PM, the Administrator and Director of Nursing was made aware of the concern.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure governing body oversight of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program and activities. This was evident during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings includeThe governing body and/or executive leadership are organized groups or individuals who assume full legal authority and responsibility for operation of the facility.On 11/21/25 at 2:00 PM the Director of Nursing (DON), who is also the QAPI contact person was asked in an interview if the QAPI committee have governing bodies, and she responded, Not sure''. She was asked who the governing bodies are, and she said: she did not know. She was asked if the facility's governing body and/or executive leadership maintain oversight of their QAPI program and activities per S483.75(f)(1)-6) and she said No.In another interview with the administrator on 11/21/25 at 2:35 PM, he was asked if the facility has a governing body that oversees their QAPI program activities, and he said no, and asked if they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This was found to be evident during the facility's recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:During the survey several observations were made of gnats in the building. On the first day of entry into the facility on [DATE], the surveyor observed multiple flying gnats in the facility's conference room.On 11/20/25 at 2:27 PM as the surveyor entered the laundry area with the Managing Partner and on the tour observed 2 rooms on the dirty side and 2 rooms that were considered clean (one with the dryers and a folding table and one separate room where two laundry staff were folding clothes. Upon entering the dirty side of the laundry area (one smaller room where the laundry chute empties and a larger, rectangular room with 3 washing machines), the surveyor observed gnats flying around in both rooms on the dirty side. There were more observed in the small…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 59 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's physician and resident representatives of a facility acquired pressure ulcer. This was true for 1 (Resident #9) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer during the recertification/complaint survey process.Findings included:According to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid services (CMS), a stage 1 wound is describe as, an observable, pressure-related alteration of intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence; may include changes in skin temperature, tissue consistency and/or sensation. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only, it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues.Change of Condition (CoC) is a standardized tool for health professionals to communicate important details about resident's care to include significant changes in a resident's physical, mental, or psychological status. This tool/form helps ensure early detection and timely intervention, as unaddressed changes can lead to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident's representative of the facility policy for bed hold, including reserve bed payment. This was evident for 1(Resident #10) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 11/17/2025 at 12:06 PM during the initial tour of the facility, Resident #10 was asked if he has been sent out to the hospital emergently and he said he went sent out recently but was not sure if he was given a bed hold policy at the time.Review of the facility census on 11/19/25 at 1:42 PM revealed that Resident #10 was hospitalized on [DATE] due to abnormal MRI result and came back to the facility on [DATE]. Notice of facility-initiated transfer was given to the residents and was signed and dated 10/2/25. Further review however did not show that a bed hold policy was given to the resident or their representatives.On 11/9/25 at 2:02 PM, the administrator was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Observation, record review and facility staff interviews, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to update the care plan of Resident #2 who is on isolation precaution to reflect the actual status of the isolation and, 2) failed to conduct care plan meetings of the interdisciplinary team for Resident #11 at the time of the quarterly revision of their care plan. This was evident for 2 (Resident #2 and #11) out of 56 residents reviewed for care plans during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated, standardized assessment tool used to comprehensively evaluate a resident's health status, functional abilities, and needs. It is administered to all residents upon admission, quarterly, yearly, and whenever a significant change in an individual's condition occurs. It is the foundation for creating an individualized care plan and ensures the appropriate care and services are provided to each resident. Care plans are developed for residents to guide the care that residents receive in the facility. They are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a complaint, record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications to a resident timely, and as ordered by the physician. This was evident for 1 (Resident #105) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include,On 11/18/25 at 10:15 AM in an interview with a complainant, they revealed that a hospital physician told them that Resident #105 had a stroke because s/he was not getting their blood thinning medications as prescribed. The complainant also stated that the blood thinner was later switched to a different one that required closer monitoring.A review of the residents ordered medication on 11/18/25 at 10:29AM revealed that Resident #105 was prescribed on 1/30/25 a blood thinning medication Apixaban Oral Tablet 5 MG (Apixaban) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) a blood clot to the lower extremities. This medication was later switched on 10/7/25 to a different brand - Warfarin Sodium Oral Tablet 5 MG (Warfarin Sodium) Give…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined the facility failed to assist with feeding for a resident at risk for aspiration. This was evident for 1 (Resident #16) of 2 residents reviewed for Nutrition during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:According to guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Aspiration is the inhalation of foreign material such as food, liquids, saliva, stomach contents (including acid/vomit), or foreign objects/airborne particles into the respiratory tract or lungs. Aspiration precautions are the practices used to prevent these substances from entering the airway and lungs instead of the esophagus and stomach.On 11/18/2025 at 8:43 AM, an observation was made of Resident #16 attempting to feed his/herself while lying in bed, there was no staff member present.On 11/18/2025 at 3:21 PM, a review of Resident #16's medical record revealed a physician order for Aspiration Precautions, dated 06/23/2025. Instructions included: position patient upright during meals, provide oral care before and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) maintain a nasal cannula in a sanitary manner and administer Oxygen according to the prescribed physician order (Residents #6), and 2) failed to provide necessary respiratory care services for Resident #30. This was evident for 2 (Residents #6 and #30) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: 1) On 11/17/2025 at 11:20 AM, during an observation and interview, Resident #6 was seated in a wheelchair. The oxygen tubing was on the floor next to the bed, not dated, and not connected to the oxygen concentrator. Resident #6 was observed without oxygen and stated that oxygen causes his/her nose to bleed. On 11/17/2025 at approximately 11:25 AM, during an interview, Staff #3, Registered Nurse (RN), confirmed that Resident #6 was not receiving Oxygen (O2) as ordered by the physician. Staff #3 verified that the oxygen tubing was on the floor, was not bagged or dated, and was disconnected from the oxygen concentrator.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure parameters used to determine if a resident was to be administered pain medication was adhered to by nursing staff, and failed to have a physician's order for non- pharmacological interventions for residents on pain medications. This was evident for 3 (Resident #6 and #84, #4) out of 3 residents reviewed for pain during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: A pain scale is a numerical scale, usually 0-10, used to determine the severity of a person's pain. Parameters (Instructions in order on when a medication can be given) for a pain scale are used to determine which pain medication would be given according to a person's severity of pain. Non-pharmacological interventions are methods that manage or reduce pain without the use of pain medication. 1) On 11/17/2025 at 11:09 AM, during an interview with Resident #6 he/she reported pain and inadequate pain medication, noting he/she had informed multiple staff members. On 11/18/2025 at 9:37 AM, review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report irregularities identified by the pharmacist to the attending physician for follow up. This was evident for 1 (Resident #7) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings includeOn 11/19/2025 at 9:22 AM review of the physician's order revealed orders for pain medication written as: Oxycodone HCl Oral Tablet 10 MG (Oxycodone HCl) *Controlled Drug*give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for Pain and Oxycodone HCl Oral Capsule 5 MG (Oxycodone HCl) *Controlled Drug*Give 1 tablet by mouth every 3 hours as needed for breakthrough pain. The facility was asked to provide a monthly pharmacy review from January to October 2025.On 11/20/2025 at 9:02 AM review of the pharmacist monthly report revealed that the pharmacist recommended in March 2025 to add Narcan, a drug used to reverse the effect of narcotics. Resident #7 was on oxycodone which is a narcotic medication used to treat moderate to severe pain. The facility did not follow the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) ensure treatment carts were locked and secure, and 2) failed to store all drugs in a locked compartment as required. This was evident for 1 out of the 4 nursing units observed in the facility during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: 1) This surveyor observed on 11/17/25 at 8:23 AM the treatment cart across from room [ROOM NUMBER] was unlocked. The contents included: gauze pads, a tube of triple antibiotic ointment, a tube of hydrocortisone ointment, a container of wound cleanser solution, a tube of Lidocaine cream (name of resident was worn out), a container of hydrogel, a tube of Mupirocin ointment labelled for Resident #145, Medi honey wound and burn dressing patches sizes 4x5 and 2x2, one pair of bandage scissors, a tube of Vitamin A&D ointment, a tube of antifungal cream, a tube of Santyl ointment labelled for Resident #102, a tube of Nystatin cream, a tube of ketoconazole cream, a tube of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to 1) maintain a medical record in the most accurate form for residents and 2) maintain medical records for residents from other licenses professionals. This was evident for 2 (Resident #12 and #11) out of 46 residents reviewed during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate.1) On 11/21/25 at11:27 AM review of Resident #12's medical record revealed his/her profile documented him/her as his/her own responsible party (RP); however, further review of the medical record revealed 2 certificates of incapacity that were signed and dated 5/9/25 and 5/13/25 by two different physicians as required and a surrogate document which was uploaded into the electronic medical record (EMR) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents and/or residents' representative (RP) were provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal and/or influenza immunization. This was evident for 2 (Resident #26 and #12) out of the 5 residents reviewed for immunizations during the facility's recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend a pneumococcal vaccine for adults age [AGE] and older, as well as for younger adults (19-49) with certain risk conditions including, but not limited to, diabetes, chronic liver disease, alcoholism, cigarette smoking, chronic heart disease, chronic lung disease, and/or sickle cell anemia. It is important for nursing home residents to get a pneumococcal vaccine because they are at a higher risk of developing serious complications from pneumococcal disease, which can spread easily in the close living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff were provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccine. This was evident for 1 (Staff #30) out of 5 staff members reviewed for immunizations during the facility's recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:COVID-19 is an infectious disease leading to a range of respiratory illnesses from mild to severe. It can be very contagious and spread quickly. Some people are more likely than others to get very sick if they get COVID-19. This includes people who are older, are immunocompromised (have a weakened immune system), have certain disabilities, or have underlying health conditions. While most people recover without special treatment, some may become seriously ill, particularly older people and those with underlying conditions like heart disease, diabetes, or cancer. The COVID-19 vaccine helps protect you from severe illness, hospitalization, and death.On 11/21/25 at 9:13 AM review of Staff #30's health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-02 · tag F0638 — widespread
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for residents within the regulatory time frames to facilitate appropriate care planning and maintain current assessment records. This was evident for 11 (#85, #28, #65, #183, #59, #54, #43, #77, #18, #63, #3) of 67 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool nursing home staff use to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. The completion date of the Quarterly assessment must be within 92 days of the MDS Completion Date of the last OBRA assessment. The Quarterly assessment must be completed no later than 14 days after the ARD. That is the ARD + 14 days. The last day of this observation period is the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). This is the end date of the observation period and provides a common reference point for all team members participating in the assessment. In completing sections of the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that maintenance concerns are reported and addressed. This was found to be evident for rooms in 3 out of the 4 units in the facility. The findings include: During an initial tour of the facility, the surveyors made the following observations: - On 1/10/24 at 11:54 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER], the lower part of the wall, under the window, beside the A/C unit had 2 areas damaged, each measuring about 4x4 inches. This damage could be seen from the hallway. - On 1/10/24 at 1:50 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], cracks were noted on several floor tiles and a broken corner guard on the left side under the sink. - On 1/11/24 at 9:47 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER], a broken corner guard was noted on the right side under the sink. - On 1/10/24 at 9:16 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident #32 complained that the clock had stopped working. The surveyor observed that the clock read 3:15 and the current time was 9:16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff 1) failed to complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the regulatory time frames to facilitate appropriate care planning and maintain current and accurate assessment records, and 2) failed to failed to assess a resident's cognition and mood on comprehensive and quarterly MDS assessments. This was evident for 8 (#98, #281, #130, #245, #282, #235, #241 and #54) of 67 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool nursing home staff use to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. The admission MDS assessment is a comprehensive assessment for new residents and, under some circumstances, returning residents. It must be completed by the end of day 14, counting the date of admission to the facility as day 1. The Annual MDS assessment is a comprehensive assessment for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 1 (#91) of 2 residents reviewed for dental status, 1 (#98) of 3 residents reviewed for resident assessment, 2 (#65, #54) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 (#129) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each Resident receives the care they need. Active diagnoses documented on the MDS assessment are attending provider-documented diagnoses in the last 60 days that have a direct relationship to the resident's current functional status, cognitive status, mood or behavior, medical treatments, nursing monitoring, or risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans, with measurable goals and non-pharmacological approaches. This was found to be evident for for 1 (#63) of 4 residents reviewed for position and mobility, and 2 (#54, #21) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility 1) failed to ensure interdisciplinary team meetings to review and revise the care plans following each assessment, 2) failed to evaluate and update a resident's plan of care after each assessment and 3) failed to ensure that a resident and resident representative, if applicable, had the opportunity to participate in the development, review, and revision of his/her care plan after each assessment. This was evident for 4 (#53, #59, #54, #235) of 6 residents reviewed for care plan timing and revision, 1 (#68) of 6 residents reviewed for communication and sensory problems, and 1 (#106) of 2 residents reviewed for behavioral and emotional status and 1 (#21) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument, federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and interviews with the staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an activities program to meet the needs and preferences of residents. This was evident for 4(#43, #71, #63, #91) of 6 residents reviewed for activites. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. 1) Observations made of Resident #43 on 1/9/24 at 11:55 AM, 1/10/24 at 1:30 PM, and 1/10/24 at 3:16 PM revealed that Resident #43 was lying in bed and not involved in any meaningful activity program. A medical record review completed on 1/16/24 at 10:30 AM revealed a care plan for Resident #43, initiated on 9/25/2020. The focus of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that the attending physician reviewed and responded to pharmacist identified irregularities and recommendations in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (#65) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, and 1 (#53) of 2 residents reviewed for insulin The findings include: 1) On 1/11/24 at 1:14 PM, a medical record review was conducted for Resident # 65.The review revealed pharmacy progress notes that indicated a medication regimen review (MRR) was completed on 8/9/23 for Resident #65 with the recommendation to attempt a gradual dose reduction of an antidepressant. Continued record review revealed that Resident #65 was visited by attending physician # 51 on 8/25/23. However, the review did not show that attending Physician# 51 had reviewed or responded to the pharmacy recommendation for Resident #65. Further review of Resident #51's physician orders revealed that Resident #51's antidepressant dose had never decreased since the MRR was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that primary care and specialty provider notes were placed in the medical record for review by other health care professionals. This was found to be evident for 1 (#106) of 2 residents reviewed for behavioral and emotional status, 2 (#63, #59) of 6 residents reveiwed for communication and sensory problems, 1 (#53) of 2 residents reviewed for insulin, and 2 (#184, #183) of 20 residents reviewed for facility reported incidents. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #106 medical record revealed an admission date in April 2023 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, history of stroke, high blood pressure, diabetes, lung disease and dementia. Review of the medical record on 1/17/24 revealed an order dated 7/26/23 for a psychiatric consult. On 1/17/23 at 12:32 PM surveyor reviewed with the unit nurse manager (Staff #23) that there was an order for a psychiatric consult in July but no documentation was found to indicate the resident was seen as a result of the July order.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a dependent resident was groomed in a manner that preserved the resident's dignity. This was evident for 1 (# 71) of 2 residents reviewed for dignity. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each Resident receives the care they need. Observations of Resident #71 on 1/9/24 at 9:40 AM and 1/16/24 at 9:42 AM showed that Resident #71 was lying in bed with facial hair on the chin and upper lip. On 1/24/24 at 11:17 AM, a medical record review revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/18/23, which documented that Resident #71 depended on staff for all their self-care needs, including grooming and personal hygiene. Further record review showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to ensure that the resident was informed of their right to formulate an advance directive. This was evident for 2 (#54, and #235) of 5 residents reviewed for advance directives. The findings include: Advance Directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law related to provision of health care when the individual is not able to make their own decisions. 1) On 1/24/24 at 11:22 AM, a review of Resident #54's medical record revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 following an acute hospital stay. Resident #54's admission assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/12/23, documented Resident #54's Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score was 13, indicating Resident #54 was cognitively intact. Further review of Resident #54's electronic medical record (EMR) and paper medical record failed to reveal evidence that Resident 54 had an advance directive in place, and no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff 1) failed to notify a provider of a blood sugar level outside an order's acceptable range for a resident, and 2) failed to notify the physician immediately following an accident that had the potential for requiring physician intervention. This was evident for 1 (#65) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, and 1 (#245) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: 1) On 1/16/24 at 12:56 PM, during a review of an attending provider's note, dated 7/25/23, for Resident #65, it showed that Resident #65 had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes. Continued record review revealed a physician's order summary report as of August 2023 for Resident #65. The order summary report recorded an order initiated on 8/5/23 for Humalog (insulin injection). The order stated the following: Humalog Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro), inject as per sliding scale: 0 - 69 = 0 if Blood sugar (BS) is less than 70 (Blood sugar is obtained by testing a drop of blood), notify the attending…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) to residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services but had benefit days remaining and intended to remain at the nursing facility receiving non-skilled care. This was evident for 2 (#31, #106) of 3 residents reviewed for Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Protection Notification. The findings include: Residents with Medicare Part A have certain rights and protections related to financial liability and appeals. The financial liability, appeal rights, and protections are communicated to beneficiaries through notices given by providers to residents who are being discharged from Medicare services but have Medicare benefit days remaining. The notices include: Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC)- To be issued at least two calendar days before the last covered day of Medicare. Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN)- To be issued far enough before delivering potentially noncovered services to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 1 (#132) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents, and 1 (#241) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #132's medical record on 1/18/24 at 9:00 AM revealed that, on 4/25/22 and 5/4/22, the resident was transferred to the hospital for an altered mental status. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal that the resident and/or the resident representative were notified in writing of the transfer/discharge of the resident along with the reason for the transfer. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on 1/18/24 at 10:31 AM, she stated that she was unable to locate any documents that the resident and/or the resident representative was notified in writing of the transfer/discharge of the resident along with the reason for the transfer. She stated that the former Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to document what preparation and orientation was given to residents to ensure an orderly transfer to an acute care facility. This was evident for 1 (#241) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) On 1/19/24 at 4:49 PM, a review of Resident #241's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in December 2023, then transferred to an acute care facility on 12/24/23 and returned to the facility on 1/6/24, then transferred to an acute care facility on 1/18/24. On 12/24/23 at 8:54 PM, in an SBAR (the situation, background, assessment and recommendation) Communication Form, the nurse documented that Resident #241 had a critical low lab, the physician ordered the resident to be sent to the hospital for a blood transfusion, and the resident's representative was aware. Continued review of the medical record failed to reveal any documentation that the resident had received an explanation of why he/she was going to the emergency room and the potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident representative in writing of the bed-hold policy upon transfer of the resident to an acute care facility. This was evident for 1 (#132) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents, and 1 (#241) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #132 on 1/18/24 at 9:00 AM revealed that, on 4/25/22 and 5/4/22, the resident was transferred to an acute care facility for an altered mental status. Medical record documentation revealed that the resident representative was called, however there was no written documentation that the resident and / or the resident representative were notified in writing of the bed-hold policy. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on 1/18/24 at 10:31 AM, she stated that she was unable to locate any documents that the resident and/or the resident representative were notified in writing of the bed hold policy. She stated that a form has now been developed to correct the issue. 2) On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed when it was determined that a resident would remain in the facility for long term care. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #63) out of 1 resident reviewed for PASRR during the survey. The findings include: On 1/18/24 review of Resident #63's medical record revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility in June of 2022. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar type. The resident had a brief hospitalization in August 2023, after which s/he was re-admitted to the facility. The PASRR form includes four sections. Section A includes 3 questions: 1. Is the individual admitted to a NF [nursing facility] directly from a hospital after receiving acute inpatient care? 2. Does the individual require NF services for the condition for which he received care in the hospital? and 3. Has the attending physician certified before admission to the NF that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide a resident and/or a resident's representative with a summary of the baseline care plan that included a summary of the resident's medications. This was evident for 2 (#54, #235) of 6 residents reviewed careplanning. The findings include: A baseline care plan must be completed within 48 hours of a resident's admission to the facility and must include the initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, and social services. A summary of the baseline care plan as well as a list of the resident's current medications must be given to each resident. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) On 1/24/24 at 10:20 AM, during an interview, the Director of Nurses (DON) stated that baseline care plans were developed for a resident upon the resident's admission to the facility, that the resident or resident representative was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and pertinent document review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide incontinent care to a dependent resident. This was evident for 1 (#282) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injury. The findings include: A review of medical records on 1/16/24 at 11:06 AM, revealed that Resident #282 was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation and was dependent on the facility staff for all activities of daily living. On 1/10/24 at 2:38 PM, during an interview with Resident #282's family member s/he reported that Resident #282 was not getting the incontinent care that s/he needed. S/he reported that s/he remembers that this occurred more frequently on holidays and weekends. On 1/24/24 at 11:28 AM, during an interview with nurse, RN, Staff #16 reported that s/he is familiar with Resident #282's daily care and that s/he consistently needs incontinent care twice a shift. On 1/16/24 at 11:00 AM, review of Resident # 282's medical records under Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) tasks, failed to reveal documentation that Resident #282 received incontinent care on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3) Review of Resident #183's medical record revealed the resident was originally admitted in February 2023 with a brief re-hospitalization in March 2023. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, multiple myeloma (blood cancer), Parkinson's disease, diabetes, heart disease and blindness. Review of the 3/11/23 hospital discharge report revealed one of the medications at the time of discharge was pomalidomide 4 MG take one capsule by mouth daily for 21 days followed by a 7 day rest period. Pomalidomide, also known as Pomalyst, is an anticancer medication used to treat multiple myeloma. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2023 revealed there was an order to start Pomalidomide 4 mg one time a day for cancer until 4/1/23, take for for 21 days and rest 7 days. This medication was not administered on 3/12/23 and was discontinued on 3/13/23. Review of a 3/14/23 progress note, written by nurse, Staff #16, revealed the resident's responsible representative reported the oncologist (cancer physician) had started the resident on Pomalyst 4 mg, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that orders for eye doctor and audiology appointments were scheduled in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #68 and #59) of 5 residents reviewed for vision and hearing. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an admission date in 2022. The resident had diagnoses of, but not limited to, dementia, heart failure, hypothyroidism and high cholesterol. Review of a 12/1/23 nurse progress note revealed the resident had an ENT (ear, nose and throat) appointment for a hearing test which revealed bilateral mild to severe hearing loss. The nurse practitioner (NP) was made aware of recommendations with orders for inhouse audiology consult for hearing aide. A corresponding order, by NP, Staff #37, dated 12/1/23 for: Please schedule appt with In-house Audiologist for hearing aides. On 1/10/24, review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation to indicate this audiology appointment had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to ensure splints for the prevention of contracture development were re-implemented after a resident was re-admitted after a brief hospitalization, and 2) failed to ensure that a resident with a limited range of motion received treatment and services as ordered by the attending provider to prevent further decline in the range of motion. This was evident for 2 (#63, #43) of 4 residents reviewed for position and mobility. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed that the resident was originally admitted to the facility in June of 2022. The resident had a brief hospitalization in August 2023 after which s/he was re-admitted to the facility. On 01/09/24 at 12:03 PM, surveyor observed a sign on the wall near the head of the resident's bed about using a splint. Review of the 12/23/23 Minimum Data Set Assessment Section O 0500 Restorative Nursing revealed no splint or brace assistance was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on pertinent document review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately document and address a physician's recommendation for a resident to receive a urology consult. This was evident for 1 ( #38) of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheter. The findings include: On 1/11/24 at 1:54 PM, a review of medical records revealed that the Resident #38 was admitted to the facility with a indwelling urinary catheter in place. On 01/12/24, a review of Resident #38'Ss hard chart revealed the resident had a physician consultation at a local hospital during his/her stay at the facility on 11/29/23. However, further review failed to reveal the facility obtained a written recommendation from the consultation. On 1/12/24 at 2:12 PM, during an interview, second floor unit manager Staff #23, RN, confirmed that the consulting physician written recommendations were not available in Resident #38's medical records. On 1/12/24 at 3:15 PM, review of a nursing progress notes revealed a note dated 11/29/23 which stated, Resident returned from his ORTHO appointment with this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain respiratory care equipment for a resident who required continuous oxygen via nasal cannula. This was evident for 1 (#85) out of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The findings include: A prefilled humidifier with sterile water is used with oxygen concentrators to offer comfortable humidity and moisture to continuous flow oxygen therapy to prevent upper airway dryness. On 1/10/24 at 9:14 AM, an observation was made of Resident #85 receiving 3 Liters (L) of continuous oxygen via nasal cannula. The tubing or nasal cannula was neither initialed nor dated. Continued observation revealed an empty bottle of a prefilled humidifier with sterile water attached to Resident #85's oxygen concentrator, which was neither dated nor initialed. Resident #85 was interviewed at that time. During the interview, he/she said the night shift nurse had told him/her that there were no more prefilled humidifier water bottles. A subsequent observation was made on the same day at 10:55 AM by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that a facility provider failed to make their visit notes available after a visit with a resident (resident #515). This was evident for 1 (#515) of 4 residents reviewed for provider visit note availability during a facility's revisit survey. Findings includes: Review of resident #515's medical records on 4/25/24 at 8:30am revealed resident #515 received a new order for Ativan (.5 mg (milligrams) 1 tablet daily) for Anxiety. Further review of resident #515's medical records on 4/25/24 at 9:00am revealed no evidence of a diagnosis of Anxiety in the resident's list of active diagnosis. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/25/24 at 12:58 pm, the surveyor pointed out that resident #515 received a new order for a medication for Anxiety on 4/23/24 but the medical record had no evidence that the resident was seen by the provider. The DON revealed the Certified Nurse Practitioner (CRNP) #5 saw the resident on 4/23/24. The DON also admitted that CRNP #5 failed to provide a provider note to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure recommendations from the psychiatric provider was reported to the primary care provider and failed to ensure abnormal behaviors were reported to either the primary care provider or the psychiatric provider in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 1(#106) of two residents reviewed for behavioral health services during the survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #106's medical record revealed an admission date in April 2023 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, history of stroke, high blood pressure, diabetes, lung disease and dementia. On 1/9/24 at 1:39 PM the resident was observed in bed, the resident did not verbally respond to surveyor greeting. Further review of the medical record revealed an order dated 7/26/23 for a psychiatric consult. On 1/17/23 at 12:32 PM, the surveyor reviewed with the unit nurse manager, Staff #23, that there was an order for a psychiatric consult in July, but no documentation was found to indicate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to keep a resident's drug regimen free from unnecessary drugs by 1) failing to ensure orders for a topical anesthetic patch included the duration the patch should be applied, and 2) failing to implement physician orders for blood pressure and pulse parameters prior to administering a blood pressure medication. This was evident for 1 (#21) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1) A Lidocaine (local anesthetic) patch, when applied to the skin, helps reduce pain by causing a temporary loss of feeling in the area where the patch was applied. Depending on the Lidocaine patch product, the patch may be left on the skin for up to 8 or 12 hours. According to MedlinePlus a division of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Lidocaine 4% patches can be applied up to 3 times daily and for no more than 8 hours per application. Applying too many patches or topical systems or leaving them on for too long may cause serious side effects. 1a) On 1/12/24 at 12:25 PM, a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medication by administering psychotropic medications without adequate monitoring for behavior. This was evident for 2 (#54, #21) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Psychotropic medications are any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental process and behavior, and include, but not limited to anti-psychotics, anti-depressants, anti-anxiety, and hypnotics. 1) On 1/18/24 at 12:00 PM, a review of Resident #54's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses which included dementia, depression, mood disorder, and anxiety. Review of Resident #54's January 2024 MAR revealed that the resident received psychotropic medications, which included 2 antipsychotics, an antidepressant and an antianxiety medication. The MAR documented that Resident #54 recieved the following psychotropic medications: - Aripiprazole (Abilify)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and pertinent document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent for 3 (#287, #292, #42) of 5 residents observed with 31 medication administration opportunities which resulted in a error rate of 9.6 percent. The findings include: 1} A medication administration observation of Resident #287 was made on 1/18/24 at 9:39 AM. Nurse, LPN, Staff #12, was observed administering Resident # 287 a Calcium + D 600mg/10mcg(400iu) tablets, with the instructions to chew the tablets. Resident attempted to chew the tablets and reported to the nurse they were not the chewable tablets and spit the medication out. On 1/18/24 at 9:40 AM, during a brief interview with Nurse, Staff #12, s/he reported that s/he was made aware by a nurse on the floor, that the Calcium + D 600mg/10mcg(400iu) tablets s/he provided Resident #287 was not a chewable medication. S/he reported that s/he will notify the physician to obtain the correct form of the medication. On 1/18/24 at 10:30 AM, review of Resident # 287s orders revealed an order with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain locked carts where medications were stored. This was evident for 3 carts out of 9 carts observed during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 1/09/24 at 8:31 AM, an observation was made of a unlocked treatment cart near the first floor [NAME] unit nurses' station. A second observation at 8:32 AM revealed that Nurse, RN, Staff #19 was cleaning the top of a medication cart down the hall from the treatment cart. The surveyor requested that Nurse, Staff #19, join her at the treatment cart. The surveyor opened several treatment carts doors in the presence of Nurse, Staff #19. Nurse, Staff #19 confirmed that the treatment cart was unlocked, and s/he immediately locked the cart. 2) On 1/10/23 at 7:44 AM, an observation on the first floor Clear Spring unit revealed that a treatment cart was not locked. The treatment cart was observed to remain unlocked until 7:52 AM and Staff #16, RN, who was working as the unit manager for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) have a physical barrier between the clean and soiled areas of the laundry room to prevent cross-contamination and 2) clean/replace a dirty nebulizer mask. This was evident for 2 out of 2 observations of the laundry room and 1 ( #65) of 2 residents observed for oxygen use. The findings include: A nebulizer is a small machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist to be inhaled through a mouthpiece or mask and enters the lungs directly. After use, the mask or mouthpiece is washed with mild soap, rinsed under running water, dried on a paper towel, and kept in a sealable plastic bag. 1) On 1/17/24 at 9:35 AM, during a tour of the facility's laundry rooms, an observation was made of an opening between the clean and soiled areas of the laundry room with no door or physical barrier while laundry was being processed. Continued observation showed uncovered soiled linens in bins on the dirty side of the laundry room;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined the facility 1) failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ), immediately but not later than 2 hours of the allegation. This was evident for 2 (#235, #383) of 21 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1) On 1/10/24 at 10:11 AM, during an interview, Resident #235 reported that last night, during the night shift, s/he was belitted by a geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) who accused the resident of messing in his/her diaper on purpose. Resident #235 reported that the GNA slammed him/her around, almost pushing the resident off of the bed. On 1/10/24 at 11:17 AM, following Resident #235's interview, the surveyor reported the resident's allegation of abuse to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). In response, the NHA indicated that they would talk to the resident and investigate the allegations. The facility's self reported incident MD00201461 which documented the facility's investigation of Resident #235's abuse allegation was provided to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility investigation documentation, medical records and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that abuse allegations were thoroughly investigated. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #3, #34) of 21 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in June 2023. Review of facility self report MD00194762 revealed that during a meeting with the resident and resident's family member in July 2023 there was a report that the night nurse had squeezed the residents hand. On 1/30/24, review of the facility investigation documentation failed to reveal interviews with potential witnesses other than the resident and nurse involved. There was no documentation of an interview with the geriatric nursing assistant assigned to the resident at the time of the alleged event and no documentation if the resident had a roommate or not. On 1/30/24 at 12:03 PM, surveyor reviewed this concern with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-29 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the physician failed to show evidence of admission assessment for 4 Residents. This is evident for 4 of 6 resident's (Resident #46, #59, #66 and #82) reviewed during the annual survey for physician services. The findings include: 1a. On 3-27-19 review of Resident #66's medical record did not show evidence that upon admission the physician reviewed the hospital discharge summary and completed an initial H&P. The DON confirmed on 3-27-19 at 12:30 PM that Resident # 66's medical record did not include a completed H&P. 1b. On 3-28-19 review of Resident #46's medical record did not show evidence that upon admission the physician reviewed the hospital discharge summary or completed an initial history and physical (H&P). The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed on 3-28-19 at 10:00 AM Resident #46's medical record did not include a completed H&P. 1c. On 3-28-19 review of Resident #59's medical record did not show evidence that upon admission the physician reviewed the hospital discharge summary and completed an initial H&P. The DON confirmed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a medical record in the most accurate form for a resident. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #59) reviewed for accurate medical records. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. Resident #59 was admitted in 2018 with Alzheimer's disease, a progressive form of dementia. Resident #59 has deteriorated and does not know where they are, the day/month/year, and unable to answer questions appropriately. An interview with Resident #59 on 3-28-19 at 11:30 AM revealed the resident was not oriented to his/her name, where he/she was, or the day or year. Unit Manager #6 confirmed on 3-28-19 at 12:00 PM that Resident #59 is not oriented to person, place, or time. On 8-13-18 Physician #11 documented that Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received meal services at a time that would allow full participation in dialysis treatment. This was true for 1 out of 2 residents (Resident #145) reviewed for dialysis. The findings are: This surveyor interviewed Resident #145 on 3/25/19 at 1:52PM. The resident stated that dialysis treatments have been shortened three times since admission because lunch comes late. This Surveyor observed on 3/26/19 at 11:24 AM the resident eating a tuna salad sandwich and drinking water. Resident #145 said he/she had not received the lunch tray that was supposed to come up at 11:00 AM. The resident requested that a sandwich be sent up in the meantime. A tray arrived at 11:27 AM. The resident was interviewed on 3/28/19 at 11:28 AM. Resident was eating a sandwich. The resident said food was brought up by a nurse at 11:20 AM. Resident also said Dietary sent up 2 hard boiled eggs even though hardboiled eggs were on the resident's dislike list. The Administrator was interviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the physician the results of a potentially toxic Keppra blood level in a timely manner for a resident. This was evident for 1 of 56 residents (Resident #254) selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: The facility staff failed to notify the physician of a high Keppra level of 59.8 mcg/mL in a timely manner as ordered by the physician on 3/28/19. Keppra is used with other medications to treat seizures (epilepsy). Keppra blood levels of 12.0 - 46.0 mcg/mL (mg/L) are within the normal range. Levels above 46 mcg/mL are considered potentially toxic. Medical record review for Resident #254 revealed on 3/28/19 the physician ordered: Keppra level one time only until 03/28/2019 at 23:59. Further record review revealed the facility staff obtained the Keppra level results of 59.8 mcg/mL on 3/29/19 at 1:22 AM. Further review of the resident's clinical records revealed that the resident Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the Resident's received a Keppra…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, staff interview and resident interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. This was observed on 2 of 4 resident units. The findings include: On 3/25/2019 during an initial tour of the facility the following observations were made: 1. At 9:08 AM two holes were observed in the wall of room [ROOM NUMBER] beside the heating/cooling unit. 2. At 9:20 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident #99's mattress motor was on the floor rather than mounted to the footboard of the bed. It was observed that the motor would impede the bathroom door from being fully opened if mounted on the end of the resident's bed. 3. At 9:51 AM during resident interview, Resident #82 mentioned that the doors in the hallway were opened and closed loudly in the morning. During a Resident Council meeting on 3/28/2019 at 10:30 AM, members of the Resident Council also commented on the slamming of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed in a timely fashion. This was true for 1 out of the 56 residents (Resident #145) selected for review. The findings are: A review of Resident #145's PASARR revealed that only Section A. Exempted Hospital Discharge was completed. At the bottom of the section it reads: If the stay extends for 30 days or more, a new screen and resident review must be performed within 40 days of admission. The form was signed on 2/4/19. The resident had been in the facility for over 40 days. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 3/29/19 at 10:17 AM. The DON was shown the PASARR with only Section A completed. She requested that the social worker be consulted to review the PASARR. This surveyor interviewed the DON and the Social Worker (Staff #3). Staff #3 handed me a completed PASARR and confirmed that it had been greater than 40 days since the resident's admission. She said the delay in completing the PASARR was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to initiate, provide and implement comprehensive care plans for residents. This was evident for 2 of 56 residents (Residents #70 and #93) selected for review of care plans during the annual survey process. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. Care Area Assessments (CAAs) are part of this process and provide the foundation upon which a resident's individual care plan is formulated. MDS assessments are completed for all residents in certified nursing homes, regardless of source of payment for the individual resident. MDS assessments are required for residents on admission to the nursing facility, periodically, and on discharge. At the time of each MDS assessment, the expectation of the facility staff is to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to thoroughly review dental recommendations for Resident #23 and act upon those recommendations. This was evident for 1 of 56 residents selected for dental review. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #23 was seen by the dentist on 10/2/18. At that time, the dentist assessed the resident and determined Resident #23 had poor teeth condition and heavy plaque buildup. Tartar/plaque is a yellow or brown colored deposit that forms when plaque hardens on your teeth. Tartar forms below and above the gum line. It is rough and porous and can lead to receding gums and gum disease. At that time, the dentist stated Resident #23 would benefit from Peridex and consult with physician. Peridex is a medication used along with regular tooth brushing/flossing to treat gingivitis, a gum disease that causes red, swollen, and easily bleeding gums. Peridex oral rinse is used to treat gingivitis, to help reduce the redness and swelling of the gums, and to help control any gum bleeding. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to aid with meals for Residents #26 and #29 and failed to provide thorough grooming and personal hygiene services for Resident #68. This is evident for 3 of 3 residents selected for review for ADL care during the annual survey process. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. The MDS 3.0 captures information about the residents' comorbidities, physical, psychological and psychosocial functioning in addition to any treatments (e.g., hospice care, oxygen therapy, chemotherapy, dialysis) or therapies (e.g., physical, occupational, speech, restorative nursing) received. 1. The facility staff failed to aid with a meal for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility incident report review, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free from an accident or hazard. This was true for 3 out of 5 residents (Resident #256, #16 and #78) reviewed for a complaint. The findings are: 1. A review of the facility incident report revealed that on 1/1/19 at 2:20 PM the nurse (Staff #5) went into Resident #256's room and provided treatment to a sacral wound. The resident fell to the floor at 2:45 PM. The resident was assessed for pain and injury. Resident #256 did not complain of pain and the nurse observed no injury. The resident was assisted back to bed. The resident was sent to the hospital on 1/1/19 at 5:09 PM. The primary physician was called at 5:12 PM. Staff #4 was interviewed on 3/27/19 at 9:05 AM. He stated he was washing the resident after wound care. He turned the resident to him so he could wash the resident's back. The nurse (Staff #5) went to the bathroom to wash her hands. Staff #4 stated that normally the nurse would not be the one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff the failed to provide Resident #35 with the physician ordered diet. This was evident for 1 of 10 residents selected for review of nutrition and during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1a. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #35 with the physician ordered diet. Surveyor observation of Resident #35's lunch meal ticket revealed the resident was to have: double portions of meat. Surveyor observation of the resident's lunch on 3/25/19 at 1:00 PM revealed the resident was only served 1 piece of chicken and double portions of cauliflower and spaghetti. The registered dietician was made aware at that time. Subsequent observations of Resident #35's meals revealed the facility staff served the resident double meat portion. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 3/29/19 at 1:30 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to provide Resident #35 with the physician ordered diet. 1b. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #35 was provided the physician ordered diet.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to document the administration of pain medication and monitor the effectiveness. This was true for 1 out of the 6 residents (Resident #255) reviewed for pain management during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1. A review of Resident #255's clinical record revealed that the resident's primary physician ordered oxycodone 5 mg every six hours as needed for pain. Oxycodone is a strong narcotic pain-reliever. A review of the March Control Medication Utilization Record revealed oxycodone 5 mg on the following days and times were removed from the controlled lock box on 3/27/19 at 6:25 PM and 3/28/19 at 10 PM. Further review of the resident's clinical records revealed that the resident March Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the oxycodone medication on 3/27/19 at 6:25 PM and 3/28/19 at 10 PM, was not documented as given to the Resident. The facility staff failed to administered pain medication as ordered by the physician. Interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon staff interview and medical record review it was determined the facility staff failed to assist a resident in obtaining routine dental care and failed to ensure the recommendations of the dentist were carried out. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #29) selected for review of dental services during the annual survey. The findings include: 1a. The facility staff failed to thoroughly follow-up with the recommendations of the consultant dentist. Medical record review for Resident #29 revealed the resident was seen by the dentist on 7/18/18. At that time, the dentist documented the resident was assessed and documented: resident has plaque and calculus. Resident is thriving but is concerned about the condition of his/her teeth. Tooth #9 is broken to the gum along with several others. Resident stated that she/he occasionally has a hard time eating certain foods because of the broken and missing teeth that has created spaces. The Dentist recommended: the extraction of tooth #9 and the possible restoration of the tooth #14. After all the teeth that need to be removed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in safe operating condition. The findings include: On 3/25/2019 at 8:00 AM during an initial tour of the facility's kitchen the following observations were made: 1. The walk-in freezer door was observed slightly ajar and incapable of closing properly as designed. 2. A metal panel on the right side of the dishwasher was observed [NAME] out from the machine itself, potentially exposing the inside wiring to splashes and debris. 3. The drain pipe for the dishwasher was not adequately air gapped to prevent backflow in the event of a sewage back up. These findings were acknowledged by the Food Service Manager during a kitchen walk-through on 3/27/2019.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$198,937 in federal fines across 7 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $19,640 — penalty dated 2026-05-15
  • $157,249 — penalty dated 2024-02-02
  • $10,489 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • $2,797 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
  • $2,470 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
  • $2,098 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-06 for 9 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATLAS HEALTHCARE — 29 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.6-1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 28 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
2 of 5Atlas Post Acute At Woodbury Country ClubWoodbury, NJ 2 of 5Haverhill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHaverhill, MA 2 of 5Port Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterNewburyport, MA 2 of 5The Elms Rehab And Healthcare Center Of CranburyCranbury, NJ 2 of 5Village Green Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBristol, CT 2 of 5Wynwood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCinnaminson, NJ 3 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation And Healthcare At Daughters OClifton, NJ 3 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation And Healthcare At WashingtonSewell, NJ 3 of 5Masconomet Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTopsfield, MA 3 of 5Nemasket Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMiddleborough, MA 3 of 5Oak Knoll Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterFramingham, MA 3 of 5Roland Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBaltimore, MD 4 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation And Healthcare At MaywoodMaywood, NJ 4 of 5Cedar Grove Respiratory And Nursing CenterWilliamstown, NJ 4 of 5Hathorne Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterDanvers, MA 4 of 5Meadowbrook Respiratory And Nursing CenterMatawan, NJ 4 of 5Mystic Meadows Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterLittle Egg Harbor Tw, NJ 4 of 5Shrewsbury Rehabilitation And Nursing At SouthgateShrewsbury, MA 4 of 5Sippican Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMarion, MA 4 of 5Suffield House Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenteSuffield, CT 4 of 5Towson Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 5 of 5Atlas Rehabilitation & Healthcare At West DeptforWest Deptford, NJ 5 of 5Birchwood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCranford, NJ 5 of 5Bride Brook Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterNiantic, CT 5 of 5Manchester Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterManchester, CT 5 of 5Pendleton Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterMystic, CT 5 of 5Vernon Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterVernon, CT 5 of 5Waterfront Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRaritan, NJ

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TRR SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2023
JMH FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2023
JMH FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2023
MLS FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2023
MLS FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2023
SGS FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2023
SGS FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2023
OPPENHEIMER, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2023
BAK, PINCHOSIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
TRR OPCO MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/26/2025
BELETSKIY, ISAACIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
GOLDBERGER, SHLOMOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
NGWU, AMARACHIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
SALAZAR, ANDRESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
SONNENSCHEIN, MOSHEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
MALT FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2023
SGS 2010 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2023
TYH 2017 TRUSTOrganizationLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2023
HIRSCH, HADASSAIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
ISAAC, CHAIMIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
509 EAST JOPPA ROAD REALTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/26/2025
TRR SNF REALTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 46 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$298K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 11%Other / private 19%

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $298K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$379per resident / day
operating cost
$11,518per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$365per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215109. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next