Waterfront Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 89.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 132.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.97 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.05 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an air mattress was accurately set according to the resident's weight. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #31 and #76) reviewed for positioning and mobility, and was evidenced by the following: 1). On 9/25/2025 at 10:48 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #31 awake and alert, resting in bed on a low-air-loss mattress (a mattress used to prevent pressure ulcers), with the weight set between 250 and 280 pounds. On 9/26/2025 at 10:55 AM, the surveyor made a follow-up visit to the resident's room. Resident #31 was observed resting in bed on the low-air-loss mattress. The mattress weight setting was between 250 and 280 pounds. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects motor neurons, leading to muscle weakness and eventually paralysis). A review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and maintain the ice scoopers in a sanitary manner.This deficient practice was identified on 3 out of nursing 4 wings that contained ice coolers (Wings #1, #3, and #4) and was evidenced by the following: On 9/29/2025 between 11:18 AM and 12:20 PM, the surveyor observed the following:Wing #1 had a blue ice cooler that had a white mesh bag attached to it. There was an ice scooper resting in the mesh bag. The bottom of the mesh bag contained a moderate amount of black residue.Wing #3 also had a blue ice cooler with a mesh bag attached to it. Inside of the mesh bag there was an ice scooper resting inside of a foam cup. Within the cup, the surveyor observed a yellow-tinged liquid with black residue. Wing #4 had a blue ice cooler that had a mesh bag attached to it. When opened, the mesh bag revealed an ice scooper that had been placed into a plastic bag, that was not self-draining as required.On 09/29/2025 at 12:21 PM, the surveyor and the Infection Preventionist (IP) toured the units together and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 4/22/25 and 4/23/2025, it was determined that the facility staff failed to a.) consistently document in the Documentation Survey Report v2 (DSR) and b.) follow the facility's Charting and Documentation policy. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for documentation. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/22/25, at 11:38 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #4 seated in a wheelchair at the bedside. During interview the resident denied having any care issues at that time. According to the admission Record, Resident #4 was admitted with the following diagnoses, that were not limited to: neoplasm of prostate (growth or tumor in the prostate gland), anxiety disorder, and acute kidney failure. The resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS of 12 out of 15 which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food and beverages stored in one of one kitchen were dated and did not have expired manufacturer's use by dates. This had the potential to affect 114 of 116 residents who consumed food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/27/24 from 9:20 AM to 10:00 AM, during the initial kitchen inspection, with the Dietary Manager (DM) present, revealed the following: a. Observation of food and beverages stored in the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator revealed an opened one-gallon container of Russian dressing with an expired manufacturer's use by date of 09/25/23, four five-pound containers of cottage cheese with expired manufacturer's use by dates of 05/15/24, one five-pound container of cottage cheese with an expired manufacturer's use by date of 05/24/24, and 10 undated and thawed four-ounce cartons of nutritional shakes. During an interview on 05/27/24 at 9:30 AM, the DM confirmed the container of Russian dressing, and five containers of cottage cheese had expired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure seven of eight residents (Resident (R)10, R77, R9, R45, R25, R57, and R83) reviewed for dignity were treated in a dignified manner out of 26 sampled residents. The facility failed to promote a dignified dining experience which included timely meal service, eating food at the same time as tablemates, and items served in non-disposable dishes for six of six residents (Resident (R)10, R77, R9, R45, R25, and R57) reviewed for dignity in dining. Additionally, the facility failed to honor R83's right to a dignified existence and self-determination by making her wear an identification wrist band after she made staff aware that she preferred not to wear the band. Findings include: 1. Review of R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date ARD of 04/22/24, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the MDS tab, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was an adequate supply of linens for 10 (R9, R25, R45, R75, R33, R7, R15, R94, R74, and a resident requesting to remain anonymous) out of 26 sampled and 25 supplemental residents. Specifically, there was an insufficient supply of towels to meet residents' needs. Findings include: 1. During the Resident Council Group interview on 05/28/24 at 10:00 AM, three of five residents who attended stated there was a problem with the availability of towels: -R9 and R25 stated there were not enough towels (bath towels and wash cloths) available. R9 and R25 stated they waited for the clean linen cart to be delivered to their halls and immediately got their own towels because if they did not, there would not be any towels available. -R45 stated he used his terry cloth bathrobe as a towel because he did not have any towels in his room. 2. During an interview on 05/29/24 at 9:31 AM, a resident who requested to remain anonymous stated there were not enough towels. The resident stated there were no towels currently…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, facility menu review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure menus were prepared in advance which included a specific vegetable that was to be served for 39 of 56 lunch and supper meals on the facility's four-week menu cycle. This had the potential to affect 114 of 116 residents who consumed food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: 1. Review of R77's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/23/24, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the MDS tab, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, which indicated R77 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 05/27/24 at 11:05 AM, R77 voiced a concern that the facility's menu frequently listed Vegetable of the Day instead of having a specific planned vegetable that was to be served at lunch and supper. R77 stated the same vegetables were served over and over at meals. R77 stated peas and carrots were often served at lunch and supper. During an interview on 05/29/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, test tray review, record review, review of Resident Council Minutes, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at appetizing temperature for 13 of 13 residents (Resident (R) 26, R67, R81, R10, R86, R100, R105, R83, R84, R30, R45, R25, and R9) reviewed for food palatability out of 26 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to affect all 114 of 116 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen. Findings include: 1. Review of R26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/12/24, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the MDS tab, revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated R26 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 05/27/24 at 11:48 AM, R26 stated at times meals were barely edible. R26 specified breakfast was not good and was not always hot when served. During an interview on 05/29/24 at 11:13 AM, R26 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's meal service times the facility served meals later than scheduled to residents who resided on four of five facility hallways which included five residents (Resident (R) 10, R57, R211, R30, and R25) of 26 sampled residents. This had the potential to affect 114 of 116 residents who consumed meals that were prepared from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated Meal service times schedule, provided by the Dietary Manager (DM) on 05/29/24, revealed meals were scheduled to be served at the following times: -Breakfast: Wing-5 (500 Hallway): 7:40 AM to 7:55 AM; Wing-1 (100 Hallway): 7:55 AM to 8:05 AM; Wing-2 (200 Hallway): 8:05 AM to 8:15 AM; Wing-3 (300 Hallway): 8:15 AM to 8:25 AM; Wing-4 (400 Hallway): 8:25 AM to 8:35 AM. -Lunch: Wing-5 (500 Hallway): 11:55 AM to 12:05 PM; Wing-1 (100 Hallway): 12:05 PM to 12:15 PM; Wing-2 (200 Hallway): 12:15 PM to 12:25 PM; Wing-3 (300 Hallway): 12:25 PM to 12:35 PM; Wing-4 (400 Hallway): 12:35 PM to 12:45 PM. 1. Review of R10's quarterly Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure guardianship documentation to support advanced directive decision making was in place for one of three residents (Resident (R) 66) reviewed for advanced directives of 26 sampled residents. R66 was not capable of making healthcare decisions and was documented as having a legal guardian. The facility did not have the guardianship documentation for R66. Findings include: Review of the undated admission Record, provided by the facility, revealed R66 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, down syndrome, and aphasia (disorder resulting from damage to the brain affecting the ability to communicate). R66's family member (F) 66 was noted to be R66's responsible party and guardian. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/26/24 in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the MDS tab, revealed R66 was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATLAS HEALTHCARE — 29 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $533K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ