Atlas Rehabilitation And Healthcare At Washington

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 338 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 179 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 116.3 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident safety related to lights over headboard are smoking when turned on for (Resident (R)73 and R51). The lights were found to be smoking by staff on 8/31/2023 and not repaired until 9/28/2023. This failure placed R73 and R51, as well as all residents, at risk of an electrical fire and in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Additionally, the facility failed to provide a safe smoking environment for 10 residents (Resident (R) 17, R24, R48, R52, R55, R60, R65, R72, R159, and R160) of the facility identified as smokers. The facility's Administrator was informed on 09/28/23 at 6:54 PM that Immediate Jeopardy existed related to the failure to ensure overhead lights were not smoking when turned on for R73 and R51 resulting in the potential for an electrical fire. The facility provided an Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan that was accepted on 09/30/23 at 9:39 AM. The survey team validated implementation of the removal plan through interviews and record review. Immediate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the ice machine and kitchen environment in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent potential contamination and foodborne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 04/13/2026 at 9:19 AM, during a kitchen observation conducted with the Dietary Director (DD), the surveyor observed that the interior compartment of the ice machine, where ice was dispensed, contained a light yellow, slimy, film-like substance. The interior tray contained brown and black debris. The exterior compartment beneath the ice chute, used to catch ice, contained brown debris within the drainage tray. Additionally, the front surface of the ice machine contained brown, dry, powdery particles. Further observation revealed that the base of the wall, beginning at the ice machine and extending to the high-temperature dishwasher, was missing in multiple areas, exposing underlying wall materials and creating gaps between the wall and floor. On 04/13/2026 at 9:45 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards and ensure a medication was administered per the physicians order (PO) with blood pressure parameters. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 114) reviewed for dialysis and was evidenced by the following: On 04/12/26 at 10:32 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #114 lying in bed with his/her eyes open. The resident was unable to answer any questions. Resident #114's family member was at the bedside and stated that the resident attended dialysis three times a week. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: end stage renal disease (kidney failure), renal and perinephric abscess (kidney infection), and surgery on the genitourinary system. The resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to established menus to ensure nutritional adequacy for Resident #34. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 04/13/2026 at 11:43 AM, during the lunch observation in the Grenloch dining room, Resident #34 had a meal ticket that did not match the meal served. The meal ticket included pureed beef stir fry, cream of rice, pureed stir fry vegetables, vanilla pudding, fortified mashed potatoes with gravy, [NAME REDACTED] (a high calorie frozen dessert supplement), ice cream, sherbet, and whole milk 4 ounces (oz). The resident did not receive the a high calorie frozen dessert supplement as listed on the ticket. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia (a condition that causes a decline in memory, thinking, and reasoning skills), palliative care (care that focuses on relieving pain, symptoms, and stress from serious illness to improve comfort and quality…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe, consistent manner intended to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/15/24 from 9:19 AM until 10:00 AM, the surveyor observed the following in the presence of the Assistant Food Service Director (AFSD): 1. The AFSD turned on the faucet, wet her hands, applied soap to her hands, and lathered her hands with soap for a period of time too briefly to be counted, before she rinsed her hands under the running water, and dried her hands with a paper towel. The AFSD discarded the paper towel and obtained a second paper towel to turn off the faucet and then discarded it. 2. The oven was noted with heavy black soiling both inside the oven, on the outer ledge, and on the glass doors. The AFSD stated that, the cooks cleaned the oven two weeks ago, and that, the Food Service Director (FSD) just came down on us about cleaning the oven. When the surveyor asked for the cleaning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #NJ172198 Based on interview, review of the medical record and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed follow their policy to develop and implement a person-centered, comprehensive baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #154) reviewed for baseline care plan implementation. This deficient practice was identified by the following: Refer to F684 A review of Resident #154's admission Record (an admission summary) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included but were not limited to: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart beat), pseudocyst of pancreas (a large gland behind the stomach with development of a collection of leaked pancreatic fluids), cognitive communication deficit, anemia (lack of healthy red blood cells to carry oxygen through the blood), dizziness and giddiness, need for assistance with personal care. A review of Resident #154's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0660 — isolated
  Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #NJ172198 Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was provided with a discharge summary and post discharge instructions to ensure a safe and effective transition of care for 1 of 2 closed records (Resident #155) reviewed for appropriate discharge planning. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident #155's admission Record (an admission summary) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, acute cholecystitis (gallbladder inflammation), protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, unspecified (difficulty swallowing food or liquids), acquired absence of other specified parts of the digestive tract, cognitive communication deficit, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness (generalized), and a need for assistance with personal care. A review of Resident #155's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #NJ168202 and NJ172198 Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) document a physician notification in response to a resident's change of condition, b.) obtain an order for supplemental oxygen use, c.) obtain an order to send the resident to the hospital, d.) document a Registered Nurse (RN) assessment, and e.) document a resident's clinical status after the resident was sent to the hospital in accordance with professional standards. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #154) reviewed for change in condition. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer to F655 The surveyor reviewed the closed Electronic Health Record (EHR) of Resident #154 and noted a Health Status Note within the Progress Notes (PN) that was written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #2) on 03/14/24 at 14:25 (2:25 PM) which revealed, Patient received in bed with eyes opened, easily aroused. Able to make all needs known. Requires on person assist with care and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to address recommendations from the Wound Care Consultant in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #74) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/15/24 at 9:54 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #74 lying in bed. The resident stated he/she had a wound. According to the admission Record, Resident #74 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, pressure ulcer of sacral region, diabetes mellitus type 2, paraplegia, and morbid obesity. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 08/23/24, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. Further review of the MDS included the resident had a pressure ulcer that was present on admission to the facility. Review of the Care Plan included a focus, initiated 11/16/23, that the resident had actual skin breakdown with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication times were adjusted to accommodate their dialysis schedule for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #57) reviewed for dialysis. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/15/2024 at 9:54 AM, Resident #57 was observed sitting in his wheelchair with his eyes closed. A review of the Electronic Medical Record revealed Resident #57 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to, Acute Kidney Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate care, dated 08/07/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10/15, indicating Resident #57 has moderately impaired cognition. The MDS further revealed Resident #57 received dialysis while a resident at the facility. A review of the Physicians Orders (PO)revealed the following; PO dated 8/3/24 Dialysis treatment (3) times…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure hand hygiene was performed following medication administration, and b.) follow transmission-based precautions (TBP) to prevent the potential spread of infection by not utilizing personal protective equipment (PPE) for a resident on contact precautions for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #255) being observed during a medication observation. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/16/24 at 8:12 AM, during a medication administration observation, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 enter Resident #255's room to administer medications. After the resident took their medication, LPN #3 took the empty medicine cup and drinking cup from the resident using her bare hands, discarded the cups, and exited the resident's room. LPN #3 proceeded to her medication cart and did not perform hand hygiene. Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #255 had diagnoses including, but not limited to, parainfluenza (respiratory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$33,361 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $33,361 — penalty dated 2023-09-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATLAS HEALTHCARE — 29 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $755K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ