Atlas Rehabilitation And Healthcare At Daughters O

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 235 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 175 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 210 beds and averages 200.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to sanitize glucometers between uses for one (Resident (R) 111) of two residents (R152 and R111) observed receiving blood glucose testing out of a total sample of 43 residents. The failure to sanitize glucometers between residents resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F880-J: Infection Control due to the increased likelihood to cause serious harm due to the potential of cross-contamination of blood-borne pathogens. On 05/04/23 at 7:15 PM, the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ at F880-K: Infection Control. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 05/03/23 when the survey team identified glucometers were not being sanitized between uses for R111. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan which included retraining and ensuring competency of all Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) and Registered Nurses (RN) on the use and sanitization of glucometers. Through interviews with facility staff, observations of glucose testing, and review of staff in-services, the survey team…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #185733 (397779)Based on interview, review of medical record, and other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure, a.) appropriate incontinence care was provided for 2 of 3 residents, (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for quality of care and b.) meal trays delivered timely to residents in 1 of 1 nursing unit observed (2 [NAME] unit) in accordance with standard of clinical practice facility's practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint NJ#185733 (397779) Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a complete record for 2 of 4 residents records reviewed (Residents #1 and #2). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 10/30/25 at 9:40 AM, both Surveyor #1 (S #1) and the Registered Nurse (RN) observed Resident #1 in the dining room seated in a wheelchair with other eight residents. The RN informed S #1 that Resident #1 was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with adls (activities of daily living), and incontinent of both bladder and bowel elimination. S #1 reviewed the medical records of Resident #1 and revealed: A review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (qMDS), an assessment tool, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/9/25, revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, which reflected that the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. Section H Bladder and Bowel reflected that resident always incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. A review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-18 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and transmit the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, within 14 days as required, for 14 of 38 residents, (Residents #13, #18, #48, #60, #68, #77, #102, #103, #121, #162, #172, #175, #180, and #187), reviewed for MDS, in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. Surveyor#1 (S#1) reviewed the medical records of the following residents and their MDS and revealed: A review of Resident #18's comprehensive MDS (cMDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/11/24, was completed on 7/18/24. A review of Resident #77's cMDS with an ARD of 10/31/24, was completed on 11/12/24. A review of Resident #162's cMDS with an ARD of 9/27/24, was completed on 10/9/24. A review of Resident #175's cMDS with an ARD of 11/20/24, was completed on 12/3/24. A review of Resident #180's cMDS with an ARD of 12/9/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-18 · tag F0711 — pattern
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physicians must review the residents' total program of care including medications and treatments, and write, sign, and date progress notes at each visit. This deficient practice was identified for 14 of 35 residents, (Residents#10, #13, #16, #18, #50, #60, #68, #102, #103, #121, #131, #149, #175, and #180), reviewed for physician services. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/7/25 at 11:49 AM, Surveyor #1 (S#1) observed Resident #18 in the activity room behind the 1 East nursing station seated in a wheelchair with other residents. The surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #18 and revealed: A review of the admission Record (AR, an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; effusion of left knee (swollen joint), essential hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and lymphedema (most common manifestation of lymphedema is soft tissue swelling). A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) treat each resident with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes their quality of life during breakfast and b.) provide privacy during med administration for 1 of 6 residents, (Resident #39), observed during medication pass administration. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/10/25 at 8:44 AM, during the medication administration pass observation, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), prepared medications (meds) for Resident #39, and brought them inside the dining area in the 2 East unit. The surveyor observed that there was a total of five residents inside the dining area eating their breakfast including Resident #39. The LPN also checked Resident #39's blood pressure inside the dining room. After the LPN administered the meds, the surveyor interviewed the LPN outside the dining room. The surveyor asked the LPN if it was appropriate to administer and check the blood pressure of the resident inside the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a licensed staff credentials were verified upon hire. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 9 newly hired licensed staff reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 1:30 PM, the surveyor reviewed ten randomly selected new employee files. The review for license verification/renewal for one of the new licensed employees, Social Worker (SW), revealed no license in her employee file. On [DATE] at 12:19 PM, the surveyor requested from the Regional Nurse, the SW's license. The Regional Nurse stated, She works full time as a SW. I think something with pending status on her license, the License Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) will come in and give more information. On [DATE] at 12:56 PM, the LNHA provided the surveyor a New Jersey Division Consumer Affairs license verification printout dated [DATE] at 9:14 AM, which revealed license…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the interview, review of the medical record, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident or resident representative written notification of the facility's bed hold notices for 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #175), reviewed for hospitalizations. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/7/25 at 11:33 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #175's outside door with a posted sign for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP are measures implemented in healthcare settings to prevent the transmission of infections, particularly in situations where standard precautions alone may not be sufficient) and the resident was not inside the room. On that same date and time, the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) informed the surveyor that the resident was in therapy. The surveyor reviewed the medical records of Resident #175 and revealed: A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; urinary tract infection site…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) was completed for 1 of 38 residents, (Resident #18), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the CMS's (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Version 3.0 Manual, updated October 2024 showed: An SCSA must be completed within 14 days of determining a significant change from baseline. The resident's condition is not expected to return to baseline within two weeks. Comparison with the most recent comprehensive and quarterly assessments is crucial. Criteria for SCSA include two areas of decline or improvement, or IDT (Interdisciplinary team) recommendation. Documentation of criteria met is essential in the resident's medical record. Required for various scenarios like hospice enrollment, a consistent pattern of changes, etc. On 2/7/25 at 11:49 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 18 in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, for 2 of 38 residents, (Residents #18 and #190), reviewed for MDS accuracy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/7/25 at 11:49 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #18 in the activity room behind the 1 East nursing station seated in a wheelchair with other residents. The surveyor reviewed the medical records of Resident #18 and revealed: A review of the admission Record (AR, an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; effusion of left knee (swollen joint), essential hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and lymphedema (most common manifestation of lymphedema is soft tissue swelling). A review of the quarterly MDS (qMDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/4/24, revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 6 of 15,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint#: NJ175914 Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records, and facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive plan of care to meet residents' preferences and goals and address the resident's medical and psychosocial needs. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 38 residents (Residents #111, #172, #180, and #442), reviewed for a care plan. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/7/25 at 11:26 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #111 who was seated in a wheelchair, and stated that they had just returned from a physical therapy (PT)session. Resident #111 further stated that they had several falls and that they banged up knee and it was still bruised maybe because of diabetes. The surveyor observed a Fall Risk wrist band on Resident #111's wrist and that the resident's bed was low to the ground. On 2/11/25 at 10:37 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #111's Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN#1) regarding the process for fall risk assessment and falls. LPN#1 stated that a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATLAS HEALTHCARE — 29 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ