Atlas Rehabilitation & Healthcare At West Deptfor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 231 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 184 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 156 beds and averages 147.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, review of the facility's policy, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to complete reference checks and background checks on employees before their start date. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 151 employees reviewed for background checks (Employee #30) and 57 of 151 employees reviewed for reference checks (Employee #1, Employee #2, Employee#3, Employee #4, Employee #5, Employee #6, Employee #7, Employee #8, Employee #9, Employee #10, Employee #11, Employee #12, Employee #13, Employee #14, Employee #15, Employee #16, Employee #17, Employee #18, Employee #19, Employee #20, Employee #21, Employee #22, Employee #23, Employee #24, Employee #25, Employee #26, Employee #27, Employee #28, Employee #29, Employee #30, Employee #31, Employee #32, Employee #33, Employee #34, Employee #35, Employee #36, Employee #37, Employee #38, Employee #39, Employee #40, Employee #41, Employee #42, Employee #43, Employee #44, Employee #45, Employee #46, Employee #47, Employee #48, Employee #49,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the training room toilets in the resident shower rooms in a clean and homelike environment. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 shower rooms inspected on 2 of 3 nursing units (East and West) and was evidenced by the following:On 12/5/25 at 10:57 AM, the surveyor observed the East Wing Shower Room in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) #2. When the surveyor entered the training toilet bathroom, there was a strong odor noted around the toilet. When the surveyor asked LPN/UM #2 if the area smelled of urine, the LPN/UM stated, a little bit. LPN/UM #2 then stated it should have been cleaned that morning. The surveyor observed yellow staining with dirt and debris at the rear and on the sides of the base of the toilet. LPN/UM #2 stated that it appeared as if the yellow staining had not just happened. LPN/UM #2 added that the residents utilized the shower room twice a week.At 11:02 AM, LPN/UM #2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, accurately reflected the resident's smoking status.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident #141), and was evidenced by the following: On 12/8/25 at 1:03 PM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, observed Resident #141 go outside in the smoking area and smoke two cigarettes. On 12/8/25 at 1:30 PM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #141. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: chronic obstructive disease (a progressive lung disease making breathing difficult), and solitary pulmonary nodule (a single, small spot in the lung). A review of the resident's comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], included that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an air mattress was accurately set according to the resident's weight. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #13) reviewed for pressure ulcers and was evidenced by the following:On 12/5/25 at 10:43 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #13 lying in bed awake with the head of the bed elevated. At that time, the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) #1 presented to the room and attempted to offer the resident a drink of water. The resident did not respond verbally when they were spoken to. The resident was on an air mattress that was set at 160 pounds (lbs). On 12/5/25, the surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #13.A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Stage four sacral pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin loss that extends into underlying muscle, tendon,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored in an appropriate way to prevent the spread of infection, for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #162) reviewed for respiratory care.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 12/4/25 at 10:01 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #162 in their room sitting on the bed with oxygen infusing at three liters via a nasal canula (tubing used to deliver oxygen). The surveyor also observed a Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) machine (a non-invasive breathing device used to treat sleep apnea by delivering pressurized air through a mask) on the resident's nightstand. The mask was uncovered on the nightstand. On 12/4/25 at 1:33 PM, the surveyor reviewed the resident's medical record. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: sleep apnea (a serious sleep disorder where breathing repeatedly stops and starts, most commonly due to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain kitchen equipment in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner and b.) maintain nutrition room equipment in 2 of 3 units (East and 2nd) in a clean, safe and sanitary manner as evidenced by the following:On 12/4/25 at 11:02 AM, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the following in the kitchen:1. Two (2) of two (2) convention ovens (1-upper and 1-lower unit), had baked on food debris on the two glass doors and on the inside surfaces. The FSD acknowledged that it was not cleaned according to facility policy. 2. One (6 burner) stove top, had all 6 burners with debris on the grates and around the cooker hats. The FSD acknowledged that it was not cleaned according to facility policy. 3. The oven (attached to the 6-burner unit) interior was dirty with a brown, sticky thick substance dripping down from the cooktop area into the interior oven doorframe. The FSD acknowledged that it was not cleaned according to facility policy. On 12/9/25 at 10:48 AM, in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards and procedures during the provision of wound treatments. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #13) reviewed for pressure ulcers and was evidenced by the following:On 12/5/25 at 10:43 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #13 lying in bed awake with the head of the bed elevated. The resident did not respond verbally when they were spoken to and was lying on an air mattress. On 12/5/25, the surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #13.A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included but were not limited to: Stage four sacral (a small triangular bone at the base of the spine) pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin loss that extends into underlying muscle, tendon, cartilage, and bone), pressure ulcer of left hip unstageable, pressure ulcer of right buttock unspecified stage, chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  COMPLAINT#: NJ00187516 / 402411Based on interview and review of medical records and other pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an accurately documented and complete medical records in accordance with acceptable standards and practice.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident #2's admission Record revealed that that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: quadriplegia, neurogenic bowel (a condition where the nerves that control bowel function are impaired, leading to abnormal bowel movements), and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 6/30/25, indicated that Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating that the resident's cognition was intact. A further review of Resident #2's medical record revealed that the resident filed a grievance on 4/30/25, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/26/2024 from 9:17 to 9:56 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. Upon entry to the kitchen a dietary aide (DA) was observed to have lengthy braids extending to the shoulder area. The braids on either side of the head were not contained in the hair net and were exposed. 2. In the dry storage room on an upper shelf a can of Pear Diced had a significant dent on the upper seam of the can. The FSD removed the dented can to the designated dented/damaged can area on a lower shelf of the room. 3. A stack of 5 half pans on the middle rack of the pot/pan storage rack were in the inverted position. The surveyor lifted the top pan on the stack and felt the bottom of the pan below. The pan was wet to the touch and there was a watery substance on the bottom…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that there was a physician order for the use of a Foley catheter for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for catheter use (Resident #115). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 06/26/2024 at 09:49 AM the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) told the surveyor that we tried a voiding trial and the resident failed and then the Foley catheter was reinserted. The LPN/UM then told the surveyor Resident #115 was scheduled for a surgical procedure in July. On 06/26/2024 at 12:15 PM, Resident # 115 was observed self-propelling in their wheelchair in the hallway. The catheter bag was noted inside a privacy bag. A review of the admission Record revealed Resident #115 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Lower Urinary Symptoms. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 6/13/2024, revealed Resident #115 had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATLAS HEALTHCARE — 29 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $781K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ