Sippican Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 437 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 176 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 116.6 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was recovering from a recent right hip fracture and whose Plan of Care indicated that he/she required the use of chair and bed alarms for safety, the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff consistently implemented and followed interventions identified in his/her Plan of Care while meeting his/her care needs. On 12/25/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 transferred Resident #1 into bed but did not attach the alarm box to the bed alarm sensor pad. Resident #1 was found lying on the floor complaining of right hip pain. Resident #1 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation and was diagnosed with a new right non-displaced greater trochanter fracture (upper part of the femur) which was inoperable. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Interdisciplinary Care Planning, dated as revised April 2024, indicated the following: -the facility will assess and analyze each resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance, and was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for one of two test trays. Findings include:During an interview on 5/17/26 at 9:30 A.M., Resident #109 said the food has gone downhill. During an interview on 5/17/26 at 10:05 A.M., Resident #120 said the food is not good. During an interview on 5/17/26 at 10:25 A.M., Resident #59 said since the new company took over the food has not been as good. During an interview on 5/17/26 at 10:30 A.M., Resident #115 said the food is shitty. During an interview on 5/17/26 at 10:10 A.M., Resident #3 said the food is not all that great, sometimes it's at room temperature and the staff heat it up. During an interview on 5/18/26 at 12:11 P.M., Resident #127 said he/she was supposed to get six ounces of chili and felt he/she did not. Review of Resident Council Minutes, dated 3/26/26, indicated residents had concerns about the quality of food; seems to have changed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow the planned menu for one Resident (#8), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the Resident's diet slips, resulting in food items not being provided to Resident #8 for three of three observed meals. Findings include:Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, dementia, anxiety disorder, dysphagia, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, chronic kidney disease, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 3/19/26, indicated Resident #8 was cognitively intact, as evidenced by a score of 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, required setup or clean-up assistance for meals and was on a regular diet.During an observation and interview on 5/17/26 at 11:56 A.M., Resident #8 was sitting up in a recliner with his/her overbed table in front of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was at high risk for falls, was on an anti-coagulant medication and was severely cognitively impaired, the Facility failed to ensure staff provided care consistent with professional standards of practice, when on 11/07/25 at 6:09 A.M., Resident #1 was found after unwitnessed fall on the floor sitting upright in front of his/her roommates bed, he/she was unable to communicate the circumstances surrounding the fall or whether or not he/she sustained a head strike, however neurological assessments were not initiated or conducted, per facility protocol, by nursing after his/her unwitnessed fall. Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in June 2024, diagnoses included late onset Alzheimer's disease, adjustment disorder with anxiety, major depressive disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbance, restlessness and agitation, abnormalities of gait and mobility, transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review of a Physician's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who upon admission, was assessed as being at high risk for elopement, and on 06/29/25 walked away from the activity patio area unbeknownst to staff, and was found walking outside, unattended, in the front of the building by a visitor, the Facility failed to ensure nursing developed and implemented a comprehensive person-centered care plan with interventions, treatment goals and outcomes that addressed his/her risk of elopement.Findings include:Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, dated March 2022, indicated that: - a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident;- the care plan will build on the residents' strengths and reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions;- care plan interventions are chosen only after gathering, proper sequencing of events,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were fully aware of the grievance process. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents were aware of and had access to grievance forms, and were aware they could formulate grievances anonymously, should they choose not to alert a staff member of their concern(s). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievance/Complaints, Filing, last revised April 2017, indicated but was not limited to: -Residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances (e.g. the State Ombudsman). -A copy of our grievance/complaint procedure is posted on the resident bulletin board. -Grievances and/or complaints may be submitted orally or in writing and may be filed anonymously. On 3/25/25 at 10:30 A.M., the surveyor held a resident group meeting with 12 residents, representing two of the facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed for three Residents (#8, #32, and #97), out of a total sample of 22 residents, to ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #8, to ensure a sufficient documented rationale was in place for the ongoing extended use of as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications including clonazepam (anti-anxiety medication) and triazolam (benzodiazepine - sedative, treats insomnia and anxiety); 2. For Resident #32, to ensure PRN use of Seroquel (antipsychotic) was limited to 14 days and the prescriber documented an evaluation of the Resident's current condition and the appropriateness to continue the use of PRN Seroquel and the rationale, benefit, duration and response to treatment; and 3. For Resident #97, to ensure the prescriber documented an evaluation of the Resident's current condition and the appropriateness to continue the use of PRN Seroquel and the rationale, benefit, duration and response to treatment. Findings include: Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on document review and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain an accurate surveillance system that reflected potential illnesses and infections in the facility and calculate an accurate facility infection attack rate in accordance with their pre-defined McGeer criteria; 2A. Ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was used properly by staff while cleaning an isolation room with Contact precautions in place for Resident #360; and B. Ensure staff wore the appropriate PPE while providing care for Resident #34, who was on droplet precautions, to prevent the potential spread of infection. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Programs, dated as reviewed 2/5/25, indicated but was not limited to the following: SURVEILLANCE: - a system of surveillance is utilized for prevention, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not self-administered without a physician's order and an assessment for self-administration for one Resident (#52), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assess Resident #53's ability to self-administer and manage supplemental oxygen independently. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications, dated February 2021, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. - If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this is documented in the medical record and the care plan. The decision that a resident can safely self-administer medications is re-assessed periodically based on changes in the resident's medical and/or decision-making status. Review of the National Library of Medicine Chapter 11 Oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered individualized comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented for one Resident (#4), in a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed for Resident #4, to: A. individualize their pain care plan with a Resident stated goal and individualized interventions that were in use, offered or attempted and failed in attempts to manage the Resident's actual pain; and B. develop and implement a person-centered care plan with non-pharmacological individualized interventions and targeted behaviors to help manage the Resident's ongoing psychiatric issues including anxiety, delusions, and weepiness. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated as revised March 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: - a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided the necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for three Residents (#43, #83 and #86), in a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #43, to ensure proper care and storage of the Resident's nebulizer machine and tubing was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, to help decrease the risk of contamination and infection, and Oxygen was provided to the Resident according to Physician's orders; 2. For Resident #83, the nebulizer machine and tubing were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, to help decrease the risk of contamination and infection; and 3. For Resident #86, the nebulizer machine and tubing were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, to help decrease the risk of contamination and infection. Findings include: Review of the facility's policies titled Oxygen Therapy, revised February 2022 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,788 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-01-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATLAS HEALTHCARE — 29 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 42 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $995K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA