Silvercrest Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 126 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 52.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2026-07-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a dialysis resident received the appropriate care and medications for 1 out of 1 residents who received dialysis treatments. (Resident #60)The findings include:On 7/9/2026 at 10:30 AM, a record review for Resident #60 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: End Stage Renal Failure. Renal Osteodystrophy, Disorders of Phosphorus metabolism, and Dependence on Dialysis treatments. Resident 60's current physician orders include Velphoro 500 mg chewable tablet every day (used to control high phosphorus) and Sevelamer Carbonate 800 mg give 2 tablets with meals (also used to control phosphorus levels).The record for Resident #60 revealed he was hospitalized on [DATE] with multiple falls at home and generalized muscle weakness. Resident #60 was discharged from the hospital on 5/30/26 and admitted to the facility. At the time of discharge, Resident #60 presented with a phosphorus level of 4.6…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 25 sampled residents to meet the residents nursing needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. (Resident #31 & #2) The findings include: Resident #31 On 04/21/25 at approximately 11:05 AM, Resident #31 was seen sitting in his wheelchair wearing a cardiac Life Vest (The LifeVest is a wearable cardiovascular defibrillator designed to protect individuals at risk of sudden cardiac death). A record review for Resident #31 revealed no orders for the cardiac Life Vest, and no mention of the cardiac Life Vest in the cardiac care plan. (photographic evidence obtained) On 04/23/25 at approximately 03:25 PM, an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. The DON was asked what documentation is expected from nursing for a resident with a cardiac Life Vest. The DON stated there should be a cardiac care plan that would include the cardiac Life Vest. However, when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on family interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate physician ordered services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 3 residents sampled for limited range of motion. (Resident #19) The findings include: A telephone interview was conducted with Resident #19's sister on 4/21/25 at 2:12 PM. She stated the resident had limited range of motion in his knees and was not receiving any services for the issue. A review of Resident #19's electronic medical record revealed a current physician order dated 1/28/25 stating to provide a functional maintenance program to provide stretching exercises to the bilateral knees while in bed to maintain knee extension. The current plan of care for Alteration in activities of daily living and Reduced range of motion with a diagnosis of bilateral knee contractures (revised 1/30/25) indicated that a functional maintenance program for knee stretches was started on 1/27/25 with a nursing intervention of range of motion to bilateral knees.A review of the task menu…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide medications at a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents receiving antibiotic medications via intravenous route. (Resident # 156) The findings include: On 4/21/25, Resident #156 had a pump used for intravenous therapy inside his room. On 4/21/25, Resident #156's medical records were reviewed. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a stay at a hospital. Hospital records dated 4/4/25 indicated a physician discharge order to receive Ceftriaxone (a medication given to treat bacterial infections) 2 Grams (GM) daily for 14 days. admission medication orders dated 4/4/25 stated to start Ceftriaxone 2 GM. Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed Ceftriaxone's first dose was administered on 4/8/25. A progress note dated 4/5/25 explained that the medication was not at the facility. On 4/7/25, a progress note stated the pharmacy sent intravenous medications but was waiting for the pump to be delivered. On 4/23/25, a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 4 medication carts. The findings include: On 4/21/25 at approximately 11:47 AM, an observation was made of an unlocked and unattended medication cart. Four staff members walked by the unlocked medication cart between 11:47 AM and 11:49 AM, at which time the licensed practical nurse (LPN), Staff C, came out of a resident's room and acknowledged that he left the medication cart unlocked. On 04/24/25 at approximately 09:56 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated that the expectation is to lock the medication cart and computer screen when the nurse leaves the medication cart.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to designate a single code status in the medical record for 1 of 1 residents sampled for Advance Directives. (Resident #44) The findings include: On 2/7/24, a record review was conducted for Resident #44. The resident's record contained an active order for a Full Code dated 8/21/23 and an additional active Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order dated 8/15/23. On 2/7/24 at approximately 1:17 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON was asked who is responsible for entering the code status into the medical record. The DON indicated that the admitting nurse is responsible for entering the initial code status during admission and Social Services is responsible for verifying and updating the code status if necessary. On 2/7/24 at approximately 2:56 PM, an additional interview was conducted with the DON regarding active advance directive orders for Resident #44. The DON retrieved the medical record hard copy chart and reviewed the DNR yellow State of Florida form executed on 2/23/23. The DON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff perform appropriate hand hygiene in accordance with facility policy during 1 of 1 wound care observations. (Resident #101) The findings include: An observation of wound care for Resident #101 was conducted on 2/7/24 at 10:35 AM with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). The ADON was observed to don a disposable gown, wash her hands, and apply clean gloves. She then removed the soiled dressing from the resident's sacrum and disposed of the dressing. She then cleansed the wound with the same gloves she used to remove the soiled dressing. She then washed her hands, applied new gloves, and applied the new wound dressing. Employee A did not wash or sanitize her hands after removing the soiled dressing and before cleansing the wound. An interview was conducted with the ADON on 2/7/24 at 11:37 AM. She stated she should have washed her hands and changed gloves after removing the soiled dressing and before cleansing the wound. Review of the facility policy for Non-Sterile Dressings (April 2019)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BENJAMIN LANDA — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL