No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Waters Edge Health And Rehabilitation

1500 SW Capri St, Palm City, FL 34990 · For profit - Corporation · 36 certified beds · (772) 223-5863 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (772) 223-5863 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 9 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (17% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1497 SW Martin Downs Blvd · (772) 337-8500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2854 SW Martin Downs Blvd · (772) 287-3821 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Publix1.0 mi
1320 SW Nikoma St · (772) 287-3220 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1000 SW Chapman Way · (772) 221-1418 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.3%8.7%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.5%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%0.7%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.9%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.5%14.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.2%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.0%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.7%8.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.7%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.1%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.622.131.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.201.151.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 181 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

70.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
76.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.64U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.34hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 76.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 114 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.64 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF70.3%CMS range 62.6–75.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 9.2–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge76.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.5–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.92
RN hours/ resident / day
1.35
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.12
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
16.7%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 30.7 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.39 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.12 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.55 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 17% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-30)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

9 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection control program as evidenced by failure to use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing care for 1 of 1 sampled residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) observed for catheter care, Resident #29. The findings included: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance recommends wearing PPE for resident on EBP. The article titled Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) states, Enhanced Barrier Precautions [EBP] are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. The guidance can be found at: https://www.cdc.gov/long-term-care-facilities/hcp/prevent-mdro/ppe.html. Review of the policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions documented, 1. Enhanced barrier precautions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendation review, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices as evidenced by the failure to ensure PPE (personal protective equipment) use during COVID outbreak testing for 2 of 2 sampled residents observed, Residents #1 and #11; failed to fully implement their Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy for 3 of 3 sampled residents who were not on EBP (Residents #2, #17, and #138), and 2 additional random residents (Residents #25 and #188); failed to implement appropriate infection prevention practices for eye drop administration and blood glucose monitoring for 3 of 7 sampled residents observed during the medication pass observation, Resident #3, #18 and #28; and failed to assist 11 of 11 residents, who ate independently or with minimal assistance, with hand hygiene prior to meals in the main dining room, that included random residents and sampled residents, Residents #15, #20, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate respiratory assessment or knowledge of possible medication side effects for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #24, who received a nebulizer treatment. The findings included: Review of the policy, titled, Administering Medications through a Small Volume (Handheld) Nebulizer, revised October 2010, documented, in part, Steps in the Procedure: . 6. Obtain baseline pulse, respiratory rate and lung sounds. 18. Approximately five minutes after treatment begins (or sooner if clinical judgement indicates) obtain the resident's pulse. 19. Monitor for medication side effects, including rapid pulse, restlessness and nervousness throughout the treatment. 26. Obtain post-treatment pulse, respiratory rate and lung sounds. Documentation: The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record. 5. Pulse, respiratory rate and lung sounds before and after the treatment. 6. Pulse during treatment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed for activities and anticoagulant for 3 of 11 sampled residents, Resident #8, Resident #24 and Resident#12, reviewed for care plans. The findings included: 1. Review of Resident #8's records revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: Malignant Neoplasm, Cognitive Communication, Major Depressive Disorder, Epilepsy, Anxiety Disorder, Muscle Weakness and Dementia. Review of the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) documented the resident did not have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score, indicating the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Review of Resident #8's progress notes documented: activities is spending 1:1 time with the resident. Review of the care plans revealed he did not have a care plan for activities. 2. Review of Resident #24's records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: Parkinson's Disease, Atrial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure ongoing activities were provided for 1 of 3 sampled residents, Resident#24, reviewed for activities. The findings included: Review of Resident #24 records revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Parkinson's Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Coronary Heart Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, Short of Breath, Marasmic Kwashiorkor, and Dementia. Resident #24 was currently on Hospice care. Review of her comprehensive MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 11/25/22, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) Score of 99, indicating her cognition was severely impaired. Further review of her section F: Activity Preferences documented: Very Important: Listening to music is very important to her; Books, newspapers, and magazines to read; be around animals such as pets, to do favorite activities; and go outside and get fresh air is somewhat important to her. Review of her care plans revealed she did not have an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services for residents with limited range of motion (ROM) was provided for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed, Residents #14 and #18. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Non-traumatic Brain Dysfunction and Alzheimer's disease. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, reference date 08/18/22, revealed there was no Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score, indicating Resident #14 was rarely/never understood. There were no behaviors recorded in this MDS. The MDS recorded Resident #14 required total assistance by staff for activity of daily living (ADLs) care. Review of care plan, effective date of 10/18/22, documented Resident #14 had stiffness to bilateral hands. The intervention included: Resident #14 was to have palm guards in place daily, may remove for skin checks and hygiene. On 11/07/22 at 1:50 PM, Resident #14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper positioning of a catheter bag and tubing for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed with a history of urinary tract infection (UTI), Resident #1. The findings included: On 11/14/22 at 10:17 AM, Resident #1 was observed lying in bed, the bed was at low position, and the catheter bag at the bedside was observed with scant hematuria (bloody urine). The catheter bag and tubing were observed touching the floor. When Resident #1 was asked if she had lowered the bed to low position, she stated, 'no, they did' (referring to the staff). On 11/15/22 at 09:07 AM, Resident #1 was observed lying in bed, and the catheter bag was positioned on the floor without protection. Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: Neurogenic Bladder (a urinary condition due to lack of bladder control). The significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment, reference date 09/11/22, recorded a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to act upon a decline in eating ability, ensure consistent meal intake information, and failed to assist and encourage 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for weight loss (Resident #16). The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #16 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Further review of this assessment revealed the resident needed the limited assist of one person for eating. Review of the previous MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 needed only supervision and set up of meals, indicating a decline in ability to feed herself. Review of the current care plans for Resident #16 revealed the following: Effective 02/20/21 to present, the resident had a noted functional decline in self-care, to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications in 1 of 2 medication carts observed on the Gardenia Hall and 1 of 1 treatment carts observed on the Gardenia Hall. The findings included: 1. The Policy, Storage of Medications, revised November 2020, indicated the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Under policy interpretation and implementation, #6 revealed compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals are locked when not in use. Unlocked medication carts are not left unattended. On 11/07/22 at 9:13 AM, while standing at the Gardenia unit, the medication cart was observed left opened, and unlock, while unattended. Several staff walked by the medication cart without acknowledging it. At that time, the attending nurse, Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) was in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The medication cart was facing forward…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE SERVICES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 53.7+1.3 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Burcham Hills Retirement CenterEast Lansing, MI 1 of 5Cottage Grove PlaceCedar Rapids, IA 2 of 5Casa De Las CampanasSan Diego, CA 2 of 5Linn Manor Care CenterMarion, IA 2 of 5Oakton Place Health And Rehabilitation At The ArliNaples, FL 2 of 5Pavilion At Brandon WildeEvans, GA 2 of 5Signature PointeDallas, TX 2 of 5The Stewart Health CenterCharlotte, NC 3 of 5Carillon INCLubbock, TX 3 of 5Friendship Village Of TempeTempe, AZ 3 of 5Westminster Village - West LafayetteWest Lafayette, IN 4 of 5Croasdaile VillageDurham, NC 4 of 5Dallas Retirement Village Health CenterDallas, OR 4 of 5Health Care Ctr At The Forum At Rancho San AntonioCupertino, CA 4 of 5Oaks Health Ctr At The Marshes Of Skidaway IslandSavannah, GA 4 of 5Parkwood VillageBedford, TX 4 of 5The Cedars of Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC 4 of 5Wesley Pines Retirement CommunityLumberton, NC 4 of 5Whitestone a Masonic and Eastern Star CommunityGreensboro, NC 5 of 5Acacia Health CenterPhoenix, AZ 5 of 5Avalon Health Care Center At StoneridgeMystic, CT 5 of 5Briarwood At Timber RidgeIssaquah, WA 5 of 5Chestnut Grn Hlth Ctr BlakehurTowson, MD 5 of 5Cypress Glen Retirement CommunityGreenville, NC 5 of 5Eastcastle Pl Bradford Ter Conv CtrMilwaukee, WI 5 of 5Essex Meadows Health CenterEssex, CT 5 of 5Friendship VillageKalamazoo, MI 5 of 5Green Hills Health Care CenterAmes, IA 5 of 5Greenwood Village SouthGreenwood, IN 5 of 5Hearthwood SNF Senior LivingBartlett, IL 5 of 5MarquetteIndianapolis, IN 5 of 5Premier Place At The GlenviewNaples, FL 5 of 5Radford GreenLincolnshire, IL 5 of 5Residences At Vantage PointColumbia, MD 5 of 5Rolling Green VillageGreenville, SC 5 of 5Somerfield At The HeritageBrentwood, TN 5 of 5Springs At Monarch Landing, TheNaperville, IL 5 of 5Terraces At The ClareChicago, IL 5 of 5The Arbour At Westminster ManorAustin, TX 5 of 5The Birches At Trillium WoodsPlymouth, MN

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LCS SANDHILL COVE JV LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/09/2024
LCS CC HOLDINGS INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2026
LCS HOLDING COMPANY LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/09/2024
LCS LIVING HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2026
LCS LIVING INTERMEDIATE I LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2026
LCS LIVING INTERMEDIATE II LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2026
LCS LIVING LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2026
LCS MANAGEMENT HOLDING COMPANY LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/09/2024
LCS SANDHILL COVE HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/09/2024
LIFE CARE COMPANIES LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/09/2024
LIFE CARE SERVICES COMMUNITIES LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/09/2024
MCCARTHY GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/09/2024
MPM SENIOR LIVING INVESTORS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/09/2024
OAK INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/09/2024
OAK INVESTMENT TRUST IIOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/09/2024
RCI LEGACY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/09/2024
REDWOOD HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/09/2024
BANK OF AMERICA CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 07/09/2024
BIRD, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/09/2024
DAVIS, JAMESIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/09/2024
DUFFY, PATRICKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/09/2024
LAHEY, DANIELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/09/2024
SHAW, GELYNNAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/09/2024
UHLEMANN, BRIDGETTEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/09/2024
VICTOR, JASONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/09/2024
LOWERY, PAULIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/09/2024
MONTEGUT, ERINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/09/2024
PERRIGO, SHAWNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/09/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 10%Medicare 16%Other / private 74%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$1,359per resident / day
operating cost
$41,307per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$306per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105828. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next