Accura Healthcare of Ames, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 67.0 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.96 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.12 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, facility self report and facility inservice record, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safe in the environment. Review revealed Resident #1 required assistance of one staff for personal hygiene and ambulation. On 7/4/24 at approximately 6:58 a.m., Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) assisted Resident #1 to the bathroom with a walker. Staff A proceeded to leave Resident #1 alone in the bathroom for which Resident #1 lost balance and fell to the bathroom floor and sustained a left hip fracture. Additionally on 8/27/24, Resident #2 was transported to an appointment with no staff assistance, fell while at the appointment, taken to the nearest emergency room and sustained a dental fracture to upper incisors. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a reference date of 5/23/24 for Resident #1 documented a score of 8 on Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) test…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident or representative received written bed hold information prior to a transfer to the hospital for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents #3 and #69). The facility reported a census of 63 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Metal Status (BIMS) score of 4 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further revealed the resident had diagnoses including respiratory failure and end stage renal (kidney) disease and received dialysis. Review of Progress Notes for Resident #3 revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital from the dialysis center on 12/24/25 for treatment of low oxygen saturation (tissues not receiving sufficient oxygen). The clinical census for Resident #3 documented a hospitalization 12/24/25-12/29/25. Clinical record review for Resident #3 lacked documentation related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), staff, and resident interviews the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 3 of 20 residents reviewed (Residents #6, #8 and #62). The facility reported a census of 63 residents.Findings include:1. Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated they didn't have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or related condition. The MDS included diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings). A notice of PASRR Level I screen outcome dated 11/17/25 reflected a positive screening and showed no status change. The PASRR Level I Identification Screen showed Resident #8 had evidence of a serious mental illness or an intellectual or developmental disability (IDD). The screen directed the facility to mark yes for question A1500 on the MDS. 2. Resident #6's MDS dated [DATE] lacked a diagnosis of diabetes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans accurately reflecting the needs and safety interventions for 2 of 20 sampled residents (Resident #17 and Resident #72). Specifically, the facility didn't address smoking behaviors and supervision for one person and didn't ensure staff implemented established fall prevention interventions for another. The facility reported a census of 63 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented they didn't use tobacco. Resident #17's Smoking Evaluation dated 1/13/26, revealed they smoked 10 or more cigarettes a day in the morning, afternoon, evening, and night. Resident #17's Smoking Evaluation, dated 4/12/26, revealed they smoked 5 to 10 times a day in the morning, afternoon, evening, and night. The undated Smoking Information, form provided by the facility on 4/13/26, identified Resident #17 smoked and designated the 400 Hall Courtyard as the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to maintain infection control practices for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident ##26). The facility failed to complete hand hygiene and change gloves when completing resident care. The facility reported a census of 63 residents. Findings include:Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 10 sampled residents (Resident #26). Specifically, staff failed to wash their hands or use sanitizer after removing contaminated gloves and before touching clean surfaces or moving between tasks.Resident #26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated they had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS identified they depended on staff for toilet hygiene and transfers. The MDS included diagnoses of diabetes and depression. On 4/13/26 at 3:05 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to submit a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation for 1 of 1 residents reviewed with a new mental health diagnoses (Resident #49). The facility reported a census of 69 residents. Findings include: Resident #49's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression and psychotic disorder. The MDS reflected Resident #49 took antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medication in the lookback period. The Care Plan Focus revised 2/11/25 indicated Resident #49 had a potential for behaviors, he used his call light excessively without having a need and often wouldn't participate in self-care to his capabilities. The Goal identified Resident #49 would display appropriate interactions with peers, staff, and visitors over the next review period. The Interventions directed Resident #49 as sometimes impulsive or impatient. Resident #49's Medical Diagnoses reviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview and facility process review, the facility failed to ensure residents environment was free from accidents and hazards by not assessing a resident for safety that verbalized he used a vape pen in his room for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #67). The facility reported a census of 69 residents. Findings include: Resident #67's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS listed Resident #67 as dependent on staff for bathing, toileting, and transfers. They required set up assistance with personal hygiene. They used a wheelchair for mobility. The MDS included diagnoses to include muscular dystrophy (genetic condition that causes a breakdown of skeletal muscle over time and progressive weakness), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, tachycardia (elevated heart rate greater than 100 beats per minute) and second degree burns of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, clinical records and observation the facility failed to provide appropriate interventions to minimize or prevent urinary tract infections for 3 of 4 residents reviewed with urinary catheters (Residents #11, #55, and #68). The facility reported a census of 69 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified she admitted on [DATE] to the facility. She had a skilled therapy stay from 1/27/25 to 2/18/25. The MDS identified Resident #11 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #11 required substantial/maximum assistance with toileting hygiene. The Care Plan Focus revised 3/11/25 indicated Resident #11 had an indwelling catheter. The Goal reflected Resident #11 wouldn't have signs or symptoms of a urinary infection. The Interventions instructed the following: a. Change the catheter as ordered b. Check tubing for kinks c. Monitor for signs and symptoms…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to label, date and store food/utensil in accordance with profession standards for food safety to reduce the risk of contamination and food borne illness. The facility reported a census of 69 residents. Findings include: On 3/23/25 at 10:08 AM, during the initial observation of the facility's kitchen, observed refrigerators and freezers with uncovered food items including two drinks in adaptive plastic cups, various salads in bowls and plated. The food packages lacked labeling to identify the product, the open date, and/or use by date, including unidentified meat in a plastic zip lock bag and several bagged items in the freezer (photos available). On 3/23/25 at 10:14 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) reported he knew the foods should be covered and labeled. He added he reviewed this in training. The DM reported staff brought in several items in the refrigerator in a grocery bag not dated or labeled. On 3/23/25 at 10:18 AM, observed the ice machine with the ice scoop on top of the ice machine, without a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0851 — isolated
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staff Data Report (October 1, 2024 December 31, 2024) review, facility staffing assignments review, staff punch detail review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit accurate staffing data for the PBJ Staffing Data Report which indicated the facility had excessively low weekend staffing. The facility reported a census of 69 residents. Findings include: The facility's daily assignment sheets compared to the facility staff punch detail reports, reflected the following coding errors submitted to the CMS PBJ system for the reporting period of October 1, 2024 December 31, 2024: a. 10/12/24 - Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) coded as a Certified Medication Aide (CMA) for 12 hours on day/evening shift b. 10/13/24 - CNA coded as a CMA for 12 hours on day/evening shift c. 10/19/24 - CNA coded as a CMA for 12 hours on day/evening shift d. 10/27/24 - CNA coded as a CMA for 5 hours on evening shift e. 11/2/24 - CNA coded as a CMA for 8 hours on day shift f. 11/3/24 i. Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to 3 of 5 residents observed (Residents #19, #31 and #46) during medication administration. The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #31, dated 2/15/24, documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10, indicating mild impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of medically complex conditions, coronary artery disease, renal insufficiency, age related osteoporosis and depression. During an observation on 5/19/24 at 11:30 AM, Resident #31 had her tray table in front of her as she sat in a reclining chair in her room. On her tray table contained a small cup with 3 medications next to a glass of water. Resident #31 stated she didn't know what the pills were and said the nurse left them for her to take. Upon entry into Resident #31's room, observed no staff present in the room or outside of the room. Resident #31 didn't know how long the medication sat on the tray.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ACCURA HEALTHCARE — 41 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $316K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA