Accura Healthcare of Creston
1000 East Howard, Creston, IA 50801 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 31 certified beds · (641) 782-5012 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $16,801 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-11)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 37.3% | 17.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.2% | 4.6% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 1.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.2% | 2.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.2% | 4.2% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 3.8% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 44.6% | 16.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.8% | 20.8% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.2% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.5% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 41.9% | 25.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.0% | 19.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.91 | 1.49 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.79 | 2.08 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 31 beds and averages 25.3 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility education record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve the recommended therapeutic meals in a form designed to safely meet their needs and according to physician orders for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #9, Res #16, Res #25). This had the potential of causing harm to the residents due to the risk of choking or aspiration related to eating food which was prepared at the improper consistency or being served the incorrect textured diet. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. On July 9, 2024 at 4:35 pm, the State Agency informed the facility the staff's failure to properly prepare and serve the therapeutic meals per orders creating an Immediate Jeopardy situation, which began on July 9, 2024. The facility staff removed the immediacy on July 10, 2024 when facility staff implemented the following Corrective Actions: a. Meal service for Res #9 and Res #16, puree diets, were audited by the Director of Nursing (DON)/Designee to validate they were served the meal at the correct therapeutic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-02-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, staff interviews and provider interviews, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development and deterioration of pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #5). The resident was admitted to the facility with intact skin and developed a Stage III pressure ulcer along with other wounds over the course of 3 months. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: Determining the Stage of Pressure Injury: Stage 1 Pressure Injury: Non-blanchable erythema of intact skin Intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable erythema, which may appear differently in darkly pigmented skin. Presence of blanchable erythema or changes in sensation, temperature, or firmness may precede visual changes. Color changes do not include purple or maroon discoloration; these may indicate deep tissue pressure injury. Stage 2 Pressure Injury: Partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis Partial-thickness loss of skin with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide restorative services to maintain or improve residents abilities for 6 of 19 residents reviewed (Resident #12, #18, #19, #3, #4, and #23). The facility reported a census of 19.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #12 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented diagnoses of age-related physical debility, generalized muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility and a need for assistance with personal care.Review of the residents EHR documented no restorative documentation. On 6/22/26 at 3:35 PM Resident #12 stated he would like any therapy especially with the falls. Stated he does not receive restorative therapy, physical therapy or occupational therapy. On 6/24/26 at 4:24 PM Staff B, Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) stated Resident #12 was not currently on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, Electronic Health Record (EHR) reviews and policy review the facility failed to provide residents with dignity, respect and interact with residents in a kind and considerate manner during cares for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #2 and Resident #19). The facility reported a census of 19 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #2 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 1 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 6/25/26 at 3:58 PM Staff J, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) stated she had witnessed Staff E, Register Nurse (RN) yelling at Resident #2 to act her age and comments to Resident #2 telling her to shut up on multiple occasions. Staff J stated she reported the incidents to Staff F, previous Director of Nursing (DON). 2. The MDS dated [DATE] documented Resident #19 had a BIMS of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment On 6/24/26 at 12:38 PM Resident #19 stated he had witnessed on multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, Electronic Health Record review (EHR) and policy review the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment. The facility failed to remove black fuzzy substance from window air conditioning units, surrounding window trim and walls to 2 of 2 resident rooms reviewed (Resident #18 and #19). The facility reported a census of 19. Findings Include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #18 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 6/22/26 at 3:11 PM an observation revealed a black and fuzzy substance inside of window air conditioning unit in Resident #18's window. On 6/22/26 at 3:13 PM Resident #18 stated she believed mold was inside her window air conditioning unit. She explained she reported it to the facility and was told it would be replaced in April. Resident #18 further explained that her room was musty and smelled because of it. 2. The MDS dated [DATE] documented Resident #19 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to accurately complete a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 3 of 15 residents (#5, #7, #8). The facility reported a census of 19 residents.Findings include: 1. Resident #5's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of orthostatic hypotension (drop in blood pressure upon standing), morbid obesity, and emphysema. It indicated the resident received tracheostomy care while a resident at the facility. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) did not include physician's orders for tracheostomy care. The Progress Notes did not include entries regarding tracheostomy care. The Care Plan revised 4/12/26 did not include tracheostomy care. On 6/22/26 at 12:46 PM, Resident #5 stated she never had a tracheostomy. On 6/24/26 at 12:21 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to refer a resident with a negative Level I result for the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), who had an identified mental disorder, intellectual disability or other related condition that was not addressed on the PASRR completed prior to admission to the facility, to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASRR evaluation and determination for Resident #3. The facility failed to refer Resident #3 to the PASRR appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASSR evaluation and review for determination when a new antidepressant medication was started. The facility failed to re-submit a Level II PASRR with a 180 day time limited approval to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASRR evaluation and determination for Resident #14. The facility reported a census of 19 residents.Findings Include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents (#1). The facility reported a census of 21 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 8/06/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety, depression, cerebrovascular accident (stroke) with right side hemiplegia (paralysis), aphasia (inability to speak), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). It indicated the resident required setup assistance with eating, moderate assistance with oral hygiene, maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, upper body dressing, and personal hygiene and all mobility, and was dependent with bathing, lower body dressing, and footwear. It also indicated the resident had a feeding tube and more than 50% of his total caloric intake was provided by tube feeding but the resident did not experience coughing or choking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinic record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain competent staff by failing to access a G-tube (a feeding tube surgically inserted directly into the stomach) to provide medications and failing to stop feeding a resident through a G-tube when the resident complained of pain for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (#1). The facility reported a census of 21 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 8/06/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety, depression, cerebrovascular accident (stroke) with right side hemiplegia (paralysis), aphasia (inability to speak), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). It indicated the resident required setup assistance with eating, moderate assistance with oral hygiene, maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, upper body dressing, and personal hygiene and all mobility, and was dependent with bathing, lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain proper food temperature during lunch service. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: Continuous observation of lunch service on 7/9/24 at 12:00 pm. Temperatures were obtained prior to meal service beginning which reflected the following: Creamy cheddar macaroni salad - 40 degrees Fruit - 38 degrees Ham salad - 40 degrees Tomatoes slices - 38 degrees Bacon (previously fully cooked) - 150 degrees Deviled eggs - 40 degrees. All of the cold items had been removed from the refrigerator just prior to checking temperatures. The bacon was placed on the steam table turned to heat. The macaroni salad, the fruit and the tomatoes were placed on the opposite end of the steam table which was turned off. The wells of the the cold end of the steam table were packed with ice. A full sized sheet pan of deviled eggs was placed on the counter with a cake pan underneath of it full of ice. It was noted during meal service the sheet pan was moved off of the cake pan of ice with approximately the half of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly label, date, store and serve resident foods. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: During initial walk through of the facility kitchen on 7/8/24 at 12:05 pm, the following items were found in the kitchen refrigerator: - A gallon of chocolate milk, approximately half empty, with no open date noted. - Three 20 oz bottles of cola. One of the bottles was greater than 3/4 empty. None of the bottles were labeled with a resident name or dated. - The bottom shelf of the refrigerator had a large plastic bowl of ice. On top of this bowl was a second plastic bowl filled with hard boiled eggs. The eggs were not covered with any protective wrap and had no date on them. Continuous lunch service observation began on 7/9/24 at 12:00 pm with Staff B, Cook, serving the lunch meal and observed the following: The meal for residents with a regular diet consisted of: - Bacon, lettuce and tomato (BLT) sandwich - 2 deviled egg halves - Creamy cheddar macaroni salad - Fruit The meal for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family interview, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the family and/or physician of a medication error, a fall and a significant change for 4 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #3, #24, #26, and #34). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation of medication pass began on 7/9/24 at 7:35 am with Staff A, Registered Nurse. Staff A first administered medications to Resident #26. The administration of 18 medications were observed for Resident #26. Of the 18 medications administered, three of the medications were medication errors of the incorrect dosage. Following administering the medications to Resident #26, Staff A then administered Medications to Resident #3. One medication error was noted for Resident #26, also being an incorrect dosage. On 7/9/24 at 8:30 am, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated if a stock medication does not match the order, the nurse should notify the doctor and get an order change or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to fully review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 4 of 15 resident reviewed (#11, #12, #26, and #34). The facility reported a census of 30. Findings include: 1. An observation on 7/08/24 at 3:25 PM revealed Resident #26's legs and feet were swollen. The resident stated she was taking a water pill (diuretic) for a while for the swelling in her legs. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of hypertension, deep vein thrombosis (DVT; deep vein blood clot), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol in the blood), diabetes mellitus, and morbid obesity. It revealed the resident was independent with eating and oral hygiene, required maximum assistance with upper body dressing, and was dependent in all other activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices to prevent cross contamination by staff failing to perform appropriate hand hygiene during resident cares, medication administration, and meal service for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #3, #6, #12, #16, and #26) reviewed for infection control. The facility also failed to ensure resident equipment was sanitized after use for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #6 and #12). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: 1. An observation on 7/08/24 at 1:18 PM revealed Resident #3's indwelling catheter tubing had a dependent loop with clear, yellow urine and sediment in it. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of neurogenic bladder (nerves that control the bladder do not function), epilepsy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, the facility mandatory education calendar, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement required training for multiple topics for 5 of 5 staff reviewed (Staff F, G, H, I, J). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The Employee List Report listed the following staff hire dates: Staff F 3/1/23 Staff J 3/28/23. The New Hire Report listed the following staff hire dates: Staff G 11/16/23 Staff H 10/6/23 Staff I 4/6/23 The facility lacked documentation that Staff F, Staff G, Staff H, Staff I, and Staff J completed training in communication, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), compliance and ethics, and behavioral health. The facility lacked documentation that Staff J completed training in resident rights and infection control. The 2024 Mandatory Education calendar included the following topics: effective communication, resident rights, QAPI, infection control, compliance and ethics, and resident behavioral health. The calendar stated all courses were required for all staff. On 7/11/24 at 12:07 p.m. via…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, the facility mandatory education calendar, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement communication training for 5 of 5 staff reviewed (Staff F, G, H, I, J). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The Employee List Report listed the following staff hire dates: Staff F 3/1/23 Staff J 3/28/23. The New Hire Report listed the following staff hire dates: Staff G 11/16/23 Staff H 10/6/23 Staff I 4/6/23 The facility lacked documentation that Staff F, Staff G, Staff H, Staff I, and Staff J completed training in communication. The 2024 Mandatory Education calendar included the following topics: effective communication, resident rights, QAPI, infection control, compliance and ethics, and resident behavioral health. The calendar stated all courses were required for all staff. On 7/11/24 at 12:07 p.m. via phone, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she expected all staff to be current with required training.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, the facility mandatory education calendar, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement resident rights training for 1 of 5 staff reviewed (Staff J). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The Employee List Report listed the following staff hire date: Staff J 3/28/23. The facility lacked documentation that Staff J completed training in resident rights. The 2024 Mandatory Education calendar included the following topics: effective communication, resident rights, QAPI, infection control, compliance and ethics, and resident behavioral health. The calendar stated all courses were required for all staff. On 7/11/24 at 12:07 p.m. via phone, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she expected all staff to be current with required training.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, the facility mandatory education calendar, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training for 5 of 5 staff reviewed (Staff F, G, H, I, J). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The Employee List Report listed the following staff hire dates: Staff F 3/1/23 Staff J 3/28/23. The New Hire Report listed the following staff hire dates: Staff G 11/16/23 Staff H 10/6/23 Staff I 4/6/23 The facility lacked documentation that Staff F, Staff G, Staff H, Staff I, and Staff J completed training in QAPI. The 2024 Mandatory Education calendar included the following topics: effective communication, resident rights, QAPI, infection control, compliance and ethics, and resident behavioral health. The calendar stated all courses were required for all staff. On 7/11/24 at 12:07 p.m. via phone, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she expected all staff to be current with required training.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, the facility mandatory education calendar, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement infection control training for 1 of 5 staff reviewed (Staff J). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The Employee List Report listed the following staff hire dates: Staff J 3/28/23. The facility lacked documentation that Staff J completed training in infection control. The 2024 Mandatory Education calendar included the following topics: effective communication, resident rights, QAPI, infection control, compliance and ethics, and resident behavioral health. The calendar stated all courses were required for all staff. On 7/11/24 at 12:07 p.m. via phone, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she expected all staff to be current with required training.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, the facility mandatory education calendar, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement compliance and eithics training for 5 of 5 staff reviewed (Staff F, G, H, I, J). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The Employee List Report listed the following staff hire dates: Staff F 3/1/23 Staff J 3/28/23. The New Hire Report listed the following staff hire dates: Staff G 11/16/23 Staff H 10/6/23 Staff I 4/6/23 The facility lacked documentation that Staff F, Staff G, Staff H, Staff I, and Staff J completed training in Compliance and Ethics. The 2024 Mandatory Education calendar included the following topics: effective communication, resident rights, QAPI, infection control, compliance and ethics, and resident behavioral health. The calendar stated all courses were required for all staff. On 7/11/24 at 12:07 p.m. via phone, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she expected all staff to be current with required training.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, the facility mandatory education calendar, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement behavioral health training for 5 of 5 staff reviewed (Staff F, G, H, I, J). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The Employee List Report listed the following staff hire dates: Staff F 3/1/23 Staff J 3/28/23. The New Hire Report listed the following staff hire dates: Staff G 11/16/23 Staff H 10/6/23 Staff I 4/6/23 The facility lacked documentation that Staff F, Staff G, Staff H, Staff I, and Staff J completed training in Behavioral Health. The 2024 Mandatory Education calendar included the following topics: effective communication, resident rights, QAPI, infection control, compliance and ethics, and resident behavioral health. The calendar stated all courses were required for all staff. On 7/11/24 at 12:07 p.m. via phone, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she expected all staff to be current with required training.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to document whether or not a resident wished to appeal the decision of skilled services ending for 1 of 3 residents reviewed who discharged from skilled services(Resident #234). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: a. A 2/1/24 Notice of Medicare Non-coverage(NOMNOC) documented the facility informed Resident #234 that her skilled services would end on 2/1/24. The facility lacked documentation they informed the resident of the reason her services would end and lacked documentation regarding whether the resident wished to appeal the decision of the services ending. b. A 3/18/24 NOMNOC documented the facility informed Resident #234 that her skilled services would end on 3/20/24. The facility lacked documentation they informed the resident of the reason her services would end and lacked documentation regarding whether the resident wished to appeal the decision of the services ending. The facility Social Services Manual, dated 2/2015, stated the facility would provide a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) within 14 days for a resident placed on hospice care for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #27) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed significant change in status assessment with completion of the MDS on 6/5/24. The Progress Notes dated 5/15/24 at 3:00 PM revealed the Social Worker (SW) stated resident #27 was admitted to hospice care. The Encounter Note dated 5/22/24 revealed the Nurse Practitioner (NP) stated resident #27 had been evaluated by hospice and admitted with diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis. On 7/11/24 at 4:04 PM the Regional Director of Nursing stated MDS Coordinators are remote. He stated any care plan areas that trigger on the Care Area Assessments (CAA) of a comprehensive MDS is the responsibility of the remote MDS Coordinator to care plan. Daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, resident interview, direction from the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), and policy review, the facility failed to assure each resident received an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment for 1 of 14 residents (#21) reviewed for Accuracy of Assessment. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: On 7/08/24 at 12:08 PM, the Administrator stated the facility currently had one (1) resident who received hemodialysis (HD) treatments On 7/08/24 at 3:00 PM, the resident stated he had been dependent on hemodialysis (HD) for several years and received HD treatments every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for mental diagnosis and medications (Resident #6). The facility reported census of 30 residents. Findings include: The PASRR dated 1/4/24 for Resident #6 was prior to admission to facility, 5/21/24. The PASRR revealed no mental diagnosis or medications listed. The Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 admitted to the facility with the diagnosis of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, and psychotic disorder. Resident #6 admitted to facility with drug classifications of antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant. The Care Plan initiated on 6/5/24 reveals diagnosis of dementia, depression, anxiety, and psychoactive drug use. On 7/10/24 at 10:20 AM the Social worker (SW) revealed the only PASRR for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 15 residents reviewed (#9). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: On 7/09/24 at 9:06 AM, Staff I, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) transferred Resident #9 from the bathroom to her wheelchair and from the wheelchair to her bed without a gait belt. She placed the resident's oxygen nasal cannula (NC - pronged tubing used for oxygen delivery through the nose) back on the resident. The resident's portable oxygen tank supply regulator was set on 2 Liters Per Minute (LPM) and the indicator registered in the red, refill zone. The resident's room concentrator was also set on 2 LPM. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not conducted and indicated the resident was rarely or never understood. It included diagnoses of heart failure (HF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family interviews, staff interview and hospital record review, the facility failed to perform complete and accurate assessments following a fall for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #34). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set assessment of Resident #34, dated 5/27/24 identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Risk Management form dated 6/3/24 at 8:45 pm documented Resident #34 was observed on the floor beside her bed, lying on her stomach. It revealed documentation the resident stated she was self transferring to her bed and slid off the side of the bed. The form noted no injuries observed at the time of the incident or post incident. The Progress Notes for the resident documented the following: On 6/4/24 at 3:12 am nurse summoned to resident room earlier. Resident found on stomach…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility document review, observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide an environment that is free from accidents/hazards for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for environmental hazards (Resident # 11, #9). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: 1. The facility document titled 5 Day Investigation Summary documented information which included the following: Staff F, Registered Nurse, (RN) was walking down the east hall at 6:30 pm on 6/28/24 when she observed the door to Resident #11's room slightly ajar and saw a male in the room. Staff F, RN entered the room and observed it was hazy with an odor of marijuana present with Resident #11 and two additional residents. Staff F observed two vapes lying on Resident #11's chest as she was in her wheelchair. Staff F separated the residents and removed the vapes from the room. The Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #11 identified a Brief Interview of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to follow infection prevention standards during incontinence cares for 2 of 2 residents review for incontinence cares (Residents #6, #12). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment of Resident #6 dated 6/5/24 reflected the resident to have short term and long term memory problems. The MDS revealed the resident totally dependent on toileting and personal hygiene. The MDS reflected the resident always frequently incontinent of urine and not rated for bowel incontinent. The Care Plan, last reviewed 6/3/24, identified the resident to be incontinent of bladder. The Care Plan directed staff to provide incontinence care after each incontinent episode. The Care Plan did not state bowel incontinence. On 7/9/24 at 1:28 PM, Staff L, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) entered resident #6 room. Resident #6 in wheelchair. Staff M, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), brought the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews clinical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide oxygen per physician orders for 1 of 14 residents reviewed (#9). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: On 7/09/24 at 9:06 AM, Staff I, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) placed the resident's oxygen nasal cannula (NC - pronged tubing used for oxygen delivery through the nose) back on the resident. The resident's portable oxygen tank supply regulator was set on 2 Liters Per Minute (LPM) and the indicator registered in the red, refill zone. The resident's room concentrator was also set on 2 LPM. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not conducted and indicated the resident was rarely or never understood. It included diagnoses of heart failure (HF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and non-Alzheimer's dementia. It also indicated the resident used oxygen. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to administer medications at an error rate of under 5%. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The continuous observation of medication pass on 7/9/24, beginning at 7:35 am observed the following: Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) passed medications to Resident #26. A total of 19 medications were observed being administered to Resident #26. The State Surveyor recorded each medication given to Resident #26 during the observation which included: - Furosemide, 10 mg, 2 tablets - Magnesium Oxide, 400 mg, 1 tablet - Fiber Lax, 625 mg, 1 capsule Staff A, RN next passed medications to Resident #3. A total of 8 medications were observed being administered to Resident #3. The State Surveyor again recorded each medication given to Resident #3 during observation which included: - Calcium, 500 mg, 1 tablet Following the observation of the medication pass, the list of administered medications were reconciled against the July 2024 Medication Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff, family and provider interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to update and revise a resident care plan to reflect non compliance with physician orders for 1 of 4 (Resident #1) residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #1 dated 10/10/23 identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed the resident required supervision or touching assistance for bed mobility and transfers. The MDS documented diagnoses that included high blood pressure, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body tissues). The Comprehensive Care Plan of Resident #1, reviewed 10/17/23, identified a focus area of the resident having COPD. The care plan directed to give oxygen therapy as ordered by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility document review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to implement the abuse and neglect policy by not completing background checks appropriately prior to staff employment. The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of a document titled, Employee List Report generated on 3/18/24 documented a hire date for Staff D of 1/14/24, Staff E of 1/14/24, and Staff F of 1/14/24. Review of the document titled Single Contact License and Background Check dated 1/25/24 for Staff D, Dietary Manager, documented results of further research needed in the criminal history check and submission of form [PHONE NUMBER] on the dependent adult abuse check. No subsequent research completed by the facility. Review of document titled Single Contact License and Background Check dated 1/26/24 for Staff E, Dietary Aide, documented results of further research needed in the criminal history check. No subsequent research completed by the facility. Review of document titled Single…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, family interview and staff interview, the facility failed to treat each resident with dignity and respect for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3) by not providing appropriate clothing when the resident was in a public area of the facility. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #3, dated 8/31/2023, indicated he had severe cognitive impairment for daily decision making. The MDS revealed the resident required extensive physical assistance of 2 people for bed mobility, transfer, walking, dressing and toileting. The MDS documented diagnoses that included vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, or anxiety. The MDS reflected no diagnoses of anxiety, depression, or any other psychiatric/mood disorders. The Care Plan of Resident #3 revealed a Focus Area of use of psychotropic medication related to vascular dementia, dated 8/28/2023. The Care Plan documented a goal of the resident remaining free of drug related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3, #5). The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #3, dated 8/31/2023, indicated Resident #3 had severe cognitive impairment for daily decision making. The MDS documented diagnoses that included vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, or anxiety. The MDS reflected no diagnoses of anxiety, depression, or any other psychiatric/mood disorders. The Care Plan of Resident #3 revealed a focus area of use of psychotropic medication related to vascular dementia, dated 8/28/2023. The Care Plan documented a goal of the resident remaining free of drug related complications including cognitive/behavioral impairment. The focus area of behavior problem, dated 8/31/2023 directed staff to intervene as necessary to protect the rights and safety of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to keep complete and accurate resident records for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] of Resident #5 reflected an admission date to the facility of 10/31/2023. The MDS revealed the resident to be dependent for bed mobility of rolling left and right. The MDS documented a height of 60 inches and a weight of 95 pounds. The MDS documented the resident to be at risk of development of pressure ulcers, but no unhealed pressure ulcers present on admission. The MDS documented the resident had no venous or arterial ulcers and no other ulcers, wounds or skin problems present. The Care Plan of Resident #5 revealed a focus area of potential for pressure ulcer development, dated 11/13/2023. It directed staff to administer medications as ordered, administer treatments are ordered, document and report changes in skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-07-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on the facility assessment and staff interview, the facility failed to review and update the facility assessment annually. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The Facility Assessment listed the latest date of review as 4/26/23. The assessment lacked documentation of a review of the assessment conducted from 4/26/23-7/10/24. On 7/09/24 at 4:45 PM, the Regional Director of Clinical Services stated the current facility assessment could not be located and the new one was not completed. The facility policy Facility Assessment-Rules of Participation reviewed 12/19/24, stated the facility would review the assessment at a minimum annually.
- No harm found · C2024-07-11 · tag F0843 — widespreadHave an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility document review and staff interview, the facility failed to hold a written transfer agreement with a hospital in order to assure that residents would be transferred from the facility to the hospital. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The facility lacked documentation of a transfer agreement with a local hospital. On 7/11/24 at 8:50 a.m., via phone, the Regional Director of Clinical Services stated the facility did not have a transfer agreement with a local hospital but the Administrator was in contact with the hospital last night to get this completed. Via email correspondence on 7/11/24 at 12:00 p.m., the Regional Director of Clinical Services stated the facility did not have a policy regarding a hospital Transfer Agreement.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$16,801 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-07-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-23 for 28 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ACCURA HEALTHCARE — 41 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 40 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVIV HEALTHCARE OF THE MIDWEST LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| AVENUE94 LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/01/2025 |
| AVIV HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| KIMMONS HEALTHCARE INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| KTL ENTERPRISES LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/01/2025 |
| LITTLE RIVER INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/01/2025 |
| ZRR OPCO LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/01/2025 |
| ALLEN, BRADY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| GLASER, KRISTOPHER | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| KLEINSASSER, MEGAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| LENEAVE, TED | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| TOTI, LISA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| ACCURA MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| MILLER, DANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| ROHRIG, RICKY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| WILLIAMS, CARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| AVIV FINANCING II LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| AVIV HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES OPERATING PARTNERSHIP I LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| AVIV OP LIMITED PARTNER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| IOWA LINCOLN COUNTY PROPERTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| OHI HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $120K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165275. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.