Shell Rock Senior Living

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 41 beds and averages 39.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, facility kitchen photos, and facility policy review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure the kitchen had working equipment to clean the dishes, such as a dishwasher and garbage disposal. The dishwasher failed to release the required chemicals used to clean the dishes. The sink used for the garbage disposal had standing debris filled water. The tour of the kitchen revealed multiple items covered in dirt, dust, and debris. The kitchen had undated and open items. The meal planned for that evening's dinner had flies landing on the food. In addition, the kitchen had spiderwebs and mold in the kitchen. Due to the lack of working equipment used to disinfect and clean the dishes, the standing debris filled water, insects in the kitchen touching the food, the undated and opened food, this resulted in an immediate jeopardy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interviews, facility policy, and investigation review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a safe transfer with a mechanical lift for 1 of 4 residents reviewed that required transfer assistance (Resident #1). Resident #1 sustained a fall on 2/19/24 from a mechanical lift transfer when the mechanical lift sling strap came undone resulting in Resident #1 falling to the floor feet first, striking their head, and receiving a left subtrochanteric femoral fracture (hip fracture). The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Finding include: Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderately impaired decision-making abilities. Resident #1 required substantial to maximal assistance with transfers and bed mobility. The MDS included diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident (stroke), non-Alzheimer's dementia, hemiplegia/hemiparesis (weakness/paralysis to one side of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to clean the kitchen convection oven and handwashing sink. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff wore hairnets and didn't touch food with their contaminated gloved hands. The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include: During an initial kitchen walk through on 9/2/25 at 9:18 AM observed the white hand washing sink had a dark brown discoloration around the drain measuring approximately 6 inches by 6 inches. In addition, the convection oven had a brown-like sticky discoloration on the inside and the outside of the doors, throughout the inside of the oven and on the metal racks. An observation of the Dietary Manager wearing a baseball cap without a hair net, and the hair appeared over one inch in length protruding out below the baseball cap. During a follow-up walk through observation on 9/3/25 at 11:56 AM the hand washing sink continued to have a dark brown discoloration around the drain measuring approximately 6 inches by 6 inches. The convection oven also continued to have a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to post daily staffing in a visible place for all visitors and residents to see. The facility reported a census of 34 residents.Findings include: During an observation on 9/2/25 at 10:42 AM the facility posted the Daily Staffing on a bulletin board behind the nurses' station out of view of residents, families, and visitors.During an observation on 9/3/25 at 1:55 PM the Daily Staffing remained at the same place out of site from residents, families, and visitors behind the nurses' station. During an interview on 9/4/25 at 10:37 AM the Administrator reported they kept the Daily Staffing behind the nurses' station. During an interview on 9/4/25 at 10:47 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) explained they used to keep the staff in the hallway in front of the nurses' station until the tack board broke. Now it's positioned behind the nurses' station.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide the correct portion size of 8 ounce (oz.) of chicken and pasta alfredo for 32 of 34 residents during a meal observation on 9/3/25 at the noon meal service. The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include:The facility's menu for the noon meal on 9/3/25 titled, Week 2 Wednesday, dated 5/14/25 instructed to provide 8 oz. of chicken and pasta alfredo. During an observation of the noon meal service on 9/3/25 from 11:55 AM to 12:55 AM, Staff D, Cook, used a 6 oz. scoop instead of an 8 oz. scoop as the menu directed for serving 32 servings of chicken and pasta alfredo. During an interview on 9/3/25 at 12:53 PM the Dietary Manager reported they provided a heaping 6 oz. scoop of the chicken and pasta alfredo to all residents instead of using an 8 oz. scoop as they didn't have 8 oz scoops in the facility and needed to order more. She explained she told Staff D he should use 2, four (4) oz. scoops, but he didn't. During an interview on 9/3/25 at 12:55 PM Staff D said he used…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a separate entrance and exit for clean and dirty laundry into the laundry room. In addition, the facility failed to use proper infection control practices when staff touched resident medication with their bare hand prior to medication administration. The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include:1. On 9/3/25 at 1:48 PM observed the laundry room, the staff used the same entrance and exit for clean and dirty laundry items. The room entrance/exit measured approximately 5 feet in width and couldn't keep workflow from cross-contamination. During an interview on 9/3/25 at 1:52 PM the Laundry Manager reported they used the same exit and entrance for clean and dirty laundry items. During an interview on 9/3/25 at 2:45 PM the Infection Preventionist explained she hadn't completed audits on laundry. During an interview on 9/4/25 at 10:47 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) said having clean and dirty laundry going in and out the same door wouldn't prevent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User Manual, and staff interview the facility failed to complete a significant change in condition assessment for 1 of 1 residents admitted to hospice care services (Resident #23). The facility identified a census of 34 residents.Findings include:/Resident #23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated 6 /18/25 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating a moderate cognitive loss. The MDS included diagnoses of stroke, atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate), high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, and pain unspecified.Resident #23's Clinical Census reviewed 9/3/25 identified Resident #23 admitted to hospice care on 6/19/25. The Hospice Visit Noted dated 6/19/25 at 6:41 PM reflected Resident #23's legal representative signed paperwork for her to start hospice care services with a primary diagnosis of stroke and a secondary diagnosis of failure to thrive with congestive heart failure. The Progress Note…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to identify a weight loss and notify the primary care provider (PCP), dietitian, and/or family for 1 or 2 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for weight loss. The facility identified a census of 34 residents. Findings include:Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed an admission date of 8/14/25. The MDS indicated Resident #3 weighed 191 pounds (#) at admission.The Order Summary Report (physician orders) included an order dated 8/18/25 to complete daily weights. In addition, call the PCP if Resident #3 had a difference in weight as 3# or more in a day, or 5# or more in a week. The Weights and Vitals Summary viewed 9/3/25 listed only the following weights. The dates not listed, lacked a weight:a. 8/14/25 191.4# b. 8/20/25 197.5# (difference of 6.1#). c. 8/23/25 191.4 (difference of 6.1#)d. 8/24/25 191.4#e. 8/25/25 188# (difference of 3.4#)f. 8/26/25 191.2# (difference of 3.2#)g. 8/28/25 186# (difference…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to keep flies off the food prior to serving. The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 9/3/25 at 12:08 PM a fly landed on two (2) bowls of crushed pineapple, then flew over, and landed on pureed peas. The kitchen had (4) flies present during the observation in the kitchen and one (1) dead fly noted on a cupboard door from 11:55 AM to 12:55 AM. During an interview on 9/3/25 at 2:45 PM the Infection Preventionist reported she hadn't completed audits on practices in the kitchen.During an interview on 9/4/25 at 10:37 AM with the Administrator explained the facility had bug traps but didn't know when pest control last came to the facility. She reported flies shouldn't land on the food during food service. Review of the facility's undated General Food Preparation and Handling policy instructed to prepare food items to conserve maximum nutritive value, develop, enhance flavor, and keep free of harmful organisms and substances. Review of the facility's undated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to have a full time (40 hours a week) Director of Nursing (DON) at the facility. In addition, the facility failed to have eight (8) hours of consecutive Registered Nurse (RN) coverage a day for 4 of 30 days reviewed. The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include: Record review of nursing schedules from 8/12/24 to 9/12/24 lacked RN coverage for 4 days: 8/16/24, 8/19/24, 8/28/24, and 9/2/24. During an interview on 9/13/24 at 11:16 AM the Administrator confirmed the facility didn't have 8 consecutive hours of RN coverage from 8/12/24 to 9/12/24. The days that the facility didn't have RN coverage: 8/16/24, 8/19/24, 8/28/24, and 9/2/24. During an interview on 9/15/24 at 11:46 AM the DON reported being the current DON as of 9/12/24. She informed she came to the facility for a routine rounding visit, as she is Regional Clinical Quality Specialist for the facilities corporation. She let she let the DON at the time know the state entered the building for the annual recertification survey and the DON said she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-15 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, staff, and resident interview, the facility failed to find or replace 1 of 1 resident (Resident #25) hearing aides when they identified them missing. The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include: Resident #25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] reflected he wore a hearing aid. The MDS identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 9, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of dementia, depression, and need for assistance with personal care. The Progress Note dated 6/13/24 at 9:36 AM reflected he saw his Doctor at the facility. The facilities Social Worker (SW) must review with him regarding lost hearing aids. On 9/13/24 at 11:21 AM Resident #25 reported he lost his hearing aids a few months ago and is hard of hearing. He explained it bothered him and he didn't want to talk because he couldn't hear. On 9/15/24 at 11:52 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) reported she believed the SW had the responsibility of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to provide routine repositioning for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #19). The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include: Resident #19's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment date 8/14/24 identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #19 required total assistance from staff for transfers and bed mobility. The MDS reflected he didn't walk. The MDS included diagnoses of hemiplegia/hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles), hip fracture, and a need for assistance with personal care. On 9/14/24 at 1:15 PM Staff A, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), reported Resident #19 will get up in the morning and staff didn't assist him to lay down or reposition him until after lunch on most days of the week. She added the staff never reposition him when in bed. The Care Plan Focus dated 6/18/21 reflected Resident #19 had limited physical mobility with a high…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,167 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,167 — penalty dated 2024-07-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ACCURA HEALTHCARE — 41 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $219K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA