Woodlyn Heights Healthcare Center
2060 Upper 55th Street East, Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 · For profit - Corporation · 79 certified beds · (651) 451-1881 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.9% | 18.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.6% | 4.1% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 1.9% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 2.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.6% | 4.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 4.0% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 30.5% | 20.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.1% | 12.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 74.3% | 96.1% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.6% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.7% | 24.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.7% | 17.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 74.5% | 82.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.5% | 23.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.8% | 14.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.63 | 1.61 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.80 | 1.90 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 93 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.9%CMS range 44.0–63.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.9%CMS range 6.7–13.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 2.9–14.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.68 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 68.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.80 to 1.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the ordered respiratory care and obtain an order to administer oxygen for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for respiratory status. R1 was harmed when he was admitted to the facility with an order to provide respiratory chest physiotherapy three times a day, was not provided the ordered therapy, contributing to R1's death. In addition, R1 received oxygen therapy without a physician order. Findings include: R1's medical record indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of sepsis. R1's additional diagnoses included bronchiectasis, dysphagia, obstructive sleep apnea, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). R1 was discharged from the facility on [DATE]. R1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated R1 was inpatient from [DATE] to [DATE]. R1's admitting diagnosis was respiratory failure with hypoxia, including acute kidney injury, delirium, pneumonia, two-time renal transplant, hypertensive heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing staff to meet assessed resident needs for 1 of 1 residents (R29) reviewed for restorative nursing; 1 of 1 residents (R43) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs); and 12 residents (R3, R14, R18, R29, R82, R33, R39, R5, R44, R57, R67, R74) and 3 staff members (NA-F, NA-E, NA-H) who voiced concerns with a lack of staffing. The lack of sufficient nursing staffing had the potential to affect all 46 residents in the facility. Findings include:RESTORATIVE PROGRAM:R29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R29 had intact cognition with no rejection of care behaviors during the look-back period (LBP). The MDS indicated R29 had impaired ROM on both lower extremities. The MDS indicated R29 required maximum assistance with bed mobility and lower body dressing. R29's Therapy Referral for Maintenance Program dated 10/24/24, indicated that physical therapy recommended staff assist R29 with passive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to perform adequate testing, per the manufacturer's instructions, to ensure proper sanitization of dishware used for meal preparation and meal service when using a low-temperature dishwashing machine. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) Data Plate for dishwasher Model ADC-44 dated 12/1/11, indicated that if the dishwasher was utilizing chemical sanitizer, the sanitizer required was 50 parts per million (PPM) of available Chlorine.An undated Ecolab Chlorine Test Paper (ECTP) instruction card, indicated that to test for PPM of free available chlorine, the strip should be dipped into the solution and immediately compared to the color chart. The card did not include an expiration date.The Hydrion Papers QT-10 (PPQT-10) instruction card dated 8/1/14, indicated they were used for the testing of n-alkyl dimethyl benzyl and/or n-alkyl dimethyl ethyl benzyl ammonium chloride. The card included an expiration date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-31 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
During observation and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to ensure resident's personal care information was kept secured and out of public view when stored on a mobile medication cart in the long-term care unit. This had the potential to affect 11 residents (R7, R10, R12, R14, R15, R20, R31, R43, R55, R56, R60) whose personal information was left unattended on a medication cart in the hallway corridor. Findings include: During continuous observation on 12/30/25 at 10:42 a.m., to 11:04 a.m., there was an unattended care sheet on top of unattended medication cart. Care sheet was titled Nurse/TMA and had personal information on 11 residents of the long-term care unit. The care sheet included, name, room number, bath days, diets, hospice provider, and information regarding dialysis, urinary catheter use, and blood sugars. During continuous observation there were seventeen (17) instances where staff, residents, and visitors walked or were wheeled past the unattended care sheet.During interview with registered nurse (RN)-B on 12/30/25 at 11:04 a.m., RN-A approached…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained at a comfortable temperature between 71- and 81-degrees Fahrenheit for 7 of 7 residents (R64, R4, R7, R38, R27, R29, R29) reviewed who indicated their rooms were cold. In addition, the facility failed to provide a homelike dining experience by serving meals on hard plastic trays for 1 of 1 resident (R29) reviewed for dining, which had the potential to affect all residents who ate in the dining room.Findings include: Temperature R64's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes with circulatory complications with intact cognition. A progress note dated 11/28/25, indicated R64 reported their room was cold and wore a flannel shirt over another shirt and long pants. Maintenance director (MD)-H performed a laser temperature which revealed it was 70.5 degrees Fahrenheit (F). On 12/29/25 at 12:22 p.m., R64 was interviewed and stated it had been cold in their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to obtain and document an informed consent, including with explanation of risk and benefits, for 1 of 5 residents (R9) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/9/25, indicated R9 had moderately impaired cognition with delusions, no hallucination, no behaviors, wandering or rejection of care.During an interview and observation on 12/29/25 at 1:13 p.m., R9 was lying in bed and appeared to be waking up from taking a nap. R9 stated she had no concerns. R9 was pleasant but appeared confused in some of her responses to questions. R9's Order Summary Report, dated 12/31/25, included the following orders: -risperidone (an antipsychotic medication) - Give 0.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a day for psychosis with a started date of 9/11/25.-Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) give 50 mg by mouth two times a day for delirium with a start date of 12/18/25. R9's December Medication Administration Record (MAR), printed 12/31/25, included the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed provide appropriate side effect monitoring (i.e., orthostatic hypotension) with antipsychotic medication consumption for 1 of 5 residents (R9) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/9/25, indicated R9 had moderately impaired cognition with delusions, no hallucination, no behaviors, wandering or rejection of care. The MDS indicated R9 took antipsychotic medication. Furthermore, MDS indicated R9 required the use of a walker and wheelchair and supervision for chair to bed transfers. R9's diagnosis report included the following diagnoses: orthostatic hypotension (sudden drop in blood pressure when a person stands up), dementia (decline in mental ability), syncope and collapse (temporary loss of consciousness-fainting), and myocardial infarction (heart attack).During an interview and observation on 12/29/25 at 1:13 p.m., R9 was lying in bed and appeared to be waking up from taking a nap. R9 stated she had no concerns. R9 was pleasant but appeared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine personal hygiene (i.e., nail care and shaving) was completed and provided for 2 of 2 residents (R44, R43) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) and who were dependent on staff for their care. Findings include: R44 - Shaving R44's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/18/15, identified R44 had intact cognition with no hallucinations or delusions, behaviors or rejection of care. MDS indicated R44 needed moderated assisted for personal hygiene which included shaving. During an interview on 12/29/25 at 1:46 p.m., R44 stated that he does not like to have any facial hair as it becomes very itchy. R44 stated he has told staff this previously. R44 stated the staff only shave him on showers days but his preference would be to be shaved daily with morning cares. R44 was observed to have approximately a quarter in beard and mustache. During an interview on 12/30/25 at 11:21 a.m., R44 was observed in his room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to consistently implement a restorative nursing program (RNP) to prevent a possible decrease in range of motion (ROM) for 1 of 1 residents (R29) reviewed for ROM. Findings include:R29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R29 had intact cognition with no rejection of care behaviors during the look-back period (LBP). The MDS indicated R29 had impaired ROM on both lower extremities. The MDS indicated R29 required maximum assistance with bed mobility and lower body dressing. R29's Therapy Referral for Maintenance Program dated 10/24/24, indicated that physical therapy recommended staff assist R29 with passive ROM to bilateral hips, knees, and ankles daily. R29's care plan dated 8/10/25, indicated R29 was to receive passive ROM to the bilateral hips, knees, and ankles daily. R29's task list dated 11/30/25 to 12/28/25, indicated that staff were to complete passive ROM on R29's bilateral hips, knees, and ankles daily. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow developed interventions for eating assistance to reduce the risk of aspiration or choking for 1 of 2 residents (R6) reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R6 had severely impaired nutrition. The MDs indicated R6 required moderate assistance with transfers and personal hygiene and was independent with eating. R6's care plan dated 9/13/25, indicated R6 required setup help for eating and was to be encouraged to get out of bed for all meals. The care plan indicated R6 had a history of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis or weakness) with a goal of having no choking episodes when eating or drinking through the review date. R6's order summary dated 11/5/25, indicated R6 had an order for a mechanical soft (soft, easier to chew food for those with chewing or swallowing difficulty) diet, was to be upright in a chair or bed while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure ordered nutritional interventions were provided to promote weight gain for 1 of 2 residents (R6) reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R6 had severely impaired nutrition. The MDS indicated R6 required moderate assistance with transfers and personal hygiene and was independent with eating. R6's care plan dated 9/13/25, indicated R6 had a potential for a nutritional problem related to dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis or weakness). The care plan indicated R6 would receive supplements per the provider's order. R6's order summary dated 11/5/25, indicated R6 had an order for a house nutritional supplement one time a day for nutritional support. The summary did not include an order for house nutritional supplements three times a day. R6's dietitian's note dated 12/17/25, indicated R6 had weight loss likely related to inadequate intake.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacist recommendations were acted upon timely for 1 of 5 residents (R9) reviewed for unnecessary medication use.Findings include:R9's Pharmacist's Recommendation to Prescriber and Residents reviewed with No Recommendation, dated July 2025 to December 2025, were reviewed and identified the following:7/18/25: no recommendations8/17/25: Seroquel an antipsychotic medication needs appropriate diagnosis. This was signed by provider 8/20/25.9/23/25: recommendation was to consider a trial discontinuation of the agents to reduce poly-pharmacy as receiving risperidone 0.5mg twice a day and Seroquel three times a day. Prescriber responded on 12/18/25 to change Seroquel to twice a day and plant to d/c (discontinue) if possible.10/20/25: no recommendations12/16/25: recommending gradual dose reduction. Provider responded GDR being completed.The November 2025 Pharmacist Recommendation to Prescriber was not provided.During an interview on 12/31/25 at 11:42 a.m., director of nursing (DON) stated she believes she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure recommended pneumococcal vaccinations, as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), were offered and/or provided in a timely manner to reduce the risk of severe disease for 1 of 5 residents (R4) reviewed for immunizations. Also, the facility failed to document shared clinical decision making for 2 of 5 residents (R16, R27) identified as needing or being offered an updated pneumococcal immunization per CDC's Recommendation of Adult Immunizations Schedule for Ages 19 Years or Older, United States, 2025, Revised October 7, 2025.Findings include:During interview and record review with director of nursing (DON) on 12/30/25 at 11:12 a.m., DON reviewed electronic medical records (EMR's) and verified the following:R4's date of birth was 2/9/53, and the EMR lacked information on pneumococcal immunization status. DON stated they expected the facility to have documentation to support him being offered or having declined the vaccine.R16's date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff were offered, and or provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccination for 3 of 3 staff (LPN-A, LPN-B, HSK-A) reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations. Findings include:Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Clinical Guidance for COVID-19 Vaccination, updated 7/11/25, indicated the CDC recommended an updated COVID-19 vaccine for most adults ages 18 years and older, including people who live and work in long-term care (LTC) settings, get one dose of an updated COVID-19 vaccine. People 65 years and older who live and work in LTC settings should receive 2 doses of an updated COVID-19 vaccine, spaced 6 months apart.During an interview on 1/9/24 at 11:38 a.m., human resources director (HR)-F stated the facility did not have any documentation of COVID-19 vaccine being offered or education provided for licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A; LPN-B or housekeeper (HSK)-A.During an interview on 1/9/25 at 1:20 p.m., director of nursing (DON) stated she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to assess potential signs of constipation to determine what, if any, interventions were needed to promote comfort and reduce the risk of complication (i.e., impaction) for 1 of 1 residents (R15); failed to comprehensively assess and develop interventions to ensure a consistent nursing approach with a developed, non-pressure skin condition for 1 of 2 (R5); and failed to ensure orders for a peripherally inserted central catheter (i.e. PICC line) were clarified and the line was managed in accordance with professional standards of care for 1 of 1 residents (R28) reviewed who had a PICC. Findings include: BOWEL MANAGEMENT: R15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R15 had moderate cognitive impairment but demonstrated no delusional thinking. Further, the MDS outlined R15 was totally incontinent of bowel and consumed multiple medications including both psychotropic and narcotic medications. On 12/2/24 at 3:07 p.m., R15 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a warm, palatable manner to promote quality of life and nutritional intake for 4 of 4 residents (R5, R15, R32, R112) reviewed for dining. This had the potential to affect 35 residents identified to reside on the units with cold food complaints. Findings include: During an observation on 12/5/24 at 7:45 a.m., tall metal meal carts and a plastic cart were observed in the main kitchen with trays placed to have a small bowl of hot cereal covered with a disposable plastic cover sitting on (approximately) every tray. Cook-A (C)-A was observed plating pancakes and sausage patties to each tray. At 8:06 a.m., the 300/400-unit meal carts left the main kitchen. During an observation and interview at 12/3/24 at 8:10 a.m., after the four meal trays were passed from the plastic cart to residents on the 400 hallway, the pancake was measured to be at 108 degrees Fahrenheit and the oatmeal was measured at 119 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring and timely removal of facility food stored in refrigerators and freezers was completed to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect approximately 10 residents who regularly consumed deli sandwiches from the facility kitchen. Findings include: During the initial tour with the dietary director (DD) at 12/2/24 at 11:37 a.m., the following foods were found in walk-in cooler in the first-floor kitchen: -Two opened plastic bags of sliced ham dated 11/4/24. -Two opened undated bags of sliced turkey. -An unopened bag of sliced turkey with an expiration date of 11/23/24 that appeared fully thawed. During an interview on 12/2/24 at 11:49 a.m., the DD stated the deli meat was quickly used so she did not expect dietary staff to date it. The DD stated she thought the bag of sliced turkey dated 11/23/24 had come from the freezer and when asked about the process to ensure thawed food was not kept past the date when it was safe to consume, was not able to answer. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines to reduce the risk of infection spread for 3 of 4 residents (R4, R12 and R28) whom resided on different wings of the care center. Findings include: A CDC Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) manual, dated 7/2022, identified MDRO transmission within a nursing home was common and contributed to substantial resident morbidity and mortality. The feature outlined EBP were defined as, . expand the use of PPE and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs to staff hands and clothing . MDROs may be indirectly transferred from resident-to-resident during these high-contact care activities . residents with wounds and indwelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (R112) reviewed for Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) had the correct code status (i.e., full code, DNR) information outlined within the medical record. This could cause R112 to receive resuscitation efforts (i.e., CPR) against his wishes. Findings include: R112's Medical Diagnosis listing, printed [DATE], identified R112's medical history and diagnoses. This identified R112 had a history of suicidal ideation, opioid use, sleep apnea, diabetes mellitus, and acute kidney failure. R112's PointClickCare (electronic medical record) displayed demographic information (i.e., room number, date of birth , allergies) along the top with a banner-like field. This identified R112 admitted to the care center on [DATE], and included a section labeled, Code Status, which directed, Advanced Directives [click-able link] Code Status: Full code. The link, when clicked, brought up another click-able link to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was maintained during the provision of personal cares for 1 of 1 resident (R4) observed to be receiving peri-care with their window blinds open to the outside parking lot. Findings include: R4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R4 had intact cognition and demonstrated no delusional thinking. On 12/4/24 at approximately 7:05 a.m., R4 was observed laying in her bed from the parking lot with her room lights on, and the window blinds pulled up approximately three-quarters (i.e., 3/4) of the window height. R4's window was at ground-floor level and a single female staff member was observed dressed in dark-blue colored scrubs and assisting R4 whose legs and peri-area were exposed and visible from the sidewalk leading up to the main entrance of the care center. The staff member had gloves on and was observed wiping R4 with a cloth on her peri-area. At 7:09 a.m., the surveyor knocked and opened R4's room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to clean and maintain a resident's wheelchair for 1 of 1 residents (R39) reviewed for safe, clean and homelike environment. Findings include: R39's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R39 was cognitively intact and had no delusions, no hallucinations, or behaviors. The quarterly MDS also indicated R39 was dependent with dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene and indicted R39 needed moderate assist with oral hygiene and was independent eating. R39's clinical diagnosis report printed on 12/5/24, indicated diagnoses of cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture), essential hypertension (high blood pressure) , functional quadriplegia (a condition that causes a person to be unable to move due to a severe disability from another medical condition), and constipation. R39's care plan printed on 12/5/24, indicated R39 independently used a motorized tilt wheelchair for locomotion. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure nails were trimmed and cleaned for 1 of 1 resident (R9) who was dependent upon staff for cares. Findings include: R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated R9 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors and did not refuse personal cares. R9's Clinical Diagnosis report printed 12/5/24, indicated diagnoses of post-polio syndrome (a condition that causes gradual muscle weakness and atrophy), morbid obesity (a disorder involving excessive body fat that increases the risk of health problems), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the pancreas doesn't make enough insulin causing the body to have trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), candidiasis of skin and nails(a fungal infection caused by an imbalance of healthy bacteria and yeast in the body) , functional quadriplegia (a condition that causes a person to be unable to move due to a severe disability from another medical condition), essential hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure that's not the result of a medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively reassess after repeated refusals of a range of motion (ROM) program and, if needed, develop interventions to reduce the risk of mobility loss for 2 of 3 resident (R9 and R39) reviewed for ROM. Findings include: R9 R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated R9 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors and did not refuse personal cares. R9's Clinical Diagnosis Report printed 12/5/24, indicated diagnoses of post-polio syndrome (a condition that causes gradual muscle weakness and atrophy), morbid obesity (a disorder involving excessive body fat that increases the risk of health problems), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the pancreas doesn't make enough insulin causing the body to have trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), candidiasis of skin and nails (a fungal infection caused by an imbalance of healthy bacteria and yeast in the body) , functional quadriplegia (a condition that causes a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and, if needed, develop interventions to promote safety and reduce the risk of injury or impairment for 1 of 1 resident (R16) reviewed who had been attempting to order alcohol from a mobile delivery service (i.e., DoorDash). Findings include: R16's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R16 had intact cognition, demonstrated no delusional thinking or hallucinations, and had several medication conditions including asthma, a history of seizure disorder, and diabetes mellitus. R16's progress note, dated 11/13/24, identified an entry at 9:03 p.m. which read, Someone was here to deliver an order to a resident while in the room . the person who delivered that her card was expired. while [sic] he was on his way out, I observed that he had a bottle of Liquor; I made the order nurse [sic] witness it . will update social services and her to be searched [sic] every shift. In addition, a subsequent note, dated 11/30/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess a resident who had significant weight gain at the care facility (37%) in less than 1 year, and failed to care plan appropriate interventions to assist with weight loss goals for 1 of 2 residents (R51) reviewed for nutrition status. Findings include: R51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] indicated R51 was admitted to the care facility on 1/29/24, was cognitively intact and independent with most activities of daily living (ADLs). R51's Diagnoses List, dated 1/29/24, indicated R51 had several medical diagnoses including unspecified personality disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. The Diagnoses List also indicated a diagnosis of prediabetes, dated 11/12/24. R51's weights documented in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R51 was admitted to the care facility weighing 210.6 pounds and his most current weight, dated 11/17/24, was 288.9 pounds, indicating a weight gain of 78.3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) or document a clinical rationale for not attempting for 1 of 5 residents (R51) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R51 was admitted to the care facility on 1/29/24, was cognitively intact and independent with most activities of daily living (ADLs). R51's Diagnoses List, dated 1/29/24, indicated R51 had several medical diagnoses including unspecified personality disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. R51's Orders, dated 1/29/24, indicated R51 had the following psychotropic medications; aripiprazole (an atypical antipsychotic indicated for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, irritability associated with autism, and Tourette's) 2 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time a day for anxiety depression and duloxetine (an antidepressant medication) 60 mg two times a day for anxiety and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic and controlled substance reconciliation was completed in accordance with established policies and procedures to reduce the risk of diversion and/or theft on 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed. This had the potential to affect 6 residents identified to have controlled substances in these carts which were reviewed during a facility-reported incident investigation for possible drug diversion. Findings include: The facility's Controlled Substances policy dated 10/19/22, indicated the narcotic records would be reconciled by a physical count of the remaining narcotic supply at the change of each shift by the oncoming and outgoing licensed nurse/designee. The policy indicated after the supply was counted and justified, each nurse would record the date and his/her signature verifying the count was correct. During an interview and observation on 11/26/24 at 9:25 a.m., the 500-hall medication cart was reviewed with registered nurse (RN)-B. The mobile cart was locked with a physical key, along with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment to two out of two residents (R2, R3) reviewed for environment. R4 had been playing his music loudly and R2 and R3 had complaints of not being able to hear their music or their televisions. Findings Include: During an observation in the 600 hallway on 7/15/24 at 11:01 a.m., R4 had his door to his room open and loud explicit music playing. This explicit music could be heard from the front entrance of the facility as well as in the other hallways. During an observation in the 600 hallway on 7/15/24 at 12:28 p.m., R4 had his door to his room open and loud music playing. This music could be heard from the front entrance of the facility as well as in the other hallways. R2's medical records printed on 7/16/24 indicated R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of cerebral palsy. R2's additional diagnoses included polyneuropathy, major depressive disorder, and mild intellectual disabilities. R2's brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet the residents medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for care plans. R1 was on dialysis, used tube feeding to get his nutrients, and had respiratory concerns, and activities of daily living and those care areas were not addressed on his care plan. Findings include: R1's medical records printed on 7/15/24 indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of sepsis. R1's additional diagnoses included nondisplaced fracture of olecranon process without intraarticular extension of right ulna, hypokalemia, falls, a kidney transplant recipient, presence of a cardiac pacemaker, anemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, other mechanical complication of surgically create arteriovenous fistula, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, bronchiectasis, dysphagia, end-stage renal disease, congestive heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor and assess the hydration status for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for hydration. R1 had an order for tube feedings with direction to adjust the free water flushes pending hydration status one time a day and facility staff were not monitoring or assessing R1's hydration status. Findings include: R1's medical record printed on 7/15/24 indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] due to sepsis. R1's additional diagnoses included hypokalemia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, bronchiectasis, dysphagic, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), gout, and lymphedema. R1's hospital discharge papers dated 5/22/24 indicated R1 had a gastrostomy-jejunostomy placed on 5/18/24. The record indicated R1 was on tube feedings with an oral diet. The record indicated R1 was on a Novasource Renal diet administered at one hundred twenty milliliters (mL) per hour for nine hours. The record indicated R1 was to receive thirty mL before and after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed assess a resident before and after dialysis for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: R1's medical record printed on 7/15/24 indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of sepsis. R1's additional diagnoses included a kidney transplant recipient, anemia in chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. R1's treatment administration record (TAR) dated 5/29/24 indicated nursing was to complete a pre-and-post dialysis assessment before dialysis and on return from dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. The pre-dialysis assessment included vital signs, level of consciousness, if the resident had experienced any muscle cramping, itching, discomfort, or pain, and if there was a thrill and bruit noted. The post-dialysis assessment included vital signs, if the resident had experienced any dizziness, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, chills, shaking, muscle weakness, skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medical record was accurately document vital signs and assessments for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for medical records. R1's treatment administration record (TAR) indicated R1 was to have a pre-and-post dialysis assessment done three days a week and all but three of those assessments were not completed. R1's vital signs were documented while he was not in the facility. Findings include: R1's medical record indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of sepsis. R1's additional diagnoses included bronchiectasis, dysphagia, obstructive sleep apnea, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). R1 was discharged from the facility on [DATE]. R1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated R1 was inpatient from [DATE] to [DATE]. R1's admitting diagnosis was respiratory failure with hypoxia, including acute kidney injury, delirium, pneumonia, two-time renal transplant, hypertensive heart and chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0848 — patternProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to offer a neutral and fair arbitration process by ensuring both the resident or his or her representative, and the facility agree on the selection of a neutral arbitrator, and that the venue is convenient to both parties for 11 of 17 residents (R1, R2, R4, R5, R15, R17, R22, R28, R42, R47, and R48) reviewed for binding arbitration. Findings include: Review of document titled Residents with Arbitration Agreements provided by facility on 3/11/24, documented R1, R2, R4, R5, R15, R17, R22, R28, R42, R47, and R48 with signed binding arbitration agreements with the facility. Review of R1, R2, R4, R5, R15, R17, R22, R28, R42, R47, and R48 Arbitration Agreements indicated, The arbitration shall be administered by the American Health Lawyers Association (AHLA) in accordance with its Rules of Procedure. In addition, The Arbitration will be conducted at a site selected by Facility. R47's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R47 had intact cognition and diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure community use glucometers were properly cleaned and disinfected between patient use for 4 of 4 residents (R10, R47, R42, R35) to have their blood glucose checked with the devices. This had the potential to affect 25 of 69 identified in the facility with orders to obtain blood glucose monitoring. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a wound vac machine was kept off the floor for 1 of 1 residents (R176) reviewed for wound care. Glucometer disinfecting between residents Per manufacturer's instruction for use of Even Care G3 Blood Glucose Monitoring System in the Cleaning and Disinfecting section highlighted the EVENCARE G3 Meter should be cleaned and disinfected between each patient and to avoid wetting the meter test strip port. The document further indicated, the approved and recommended Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) direction included using Medline Micro-Kill+ (Trademark) Disinfecting wipes. According to Medline…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to assess 2 of 2 residents (R10, R27) reviewed for the ability to self-administer medications (SAM). Findings include: R27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R27 was cognitively intact and had no issues with mood or behavior. MDS indicated R27 needed assistance to set up her meals, supervision with showers, and was independent with dressing, toileting, bathing, and transfers. R27's Medical Diagnosis report printed 3/13/24, indicated diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (a disease in which the immune system eats away the protective covering of nerves, disrupting the communication between the brain and the body), unspecified psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality), polyneuropathy (simultaneous malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body), generalized anxiety, idiopathic chronic gout (a condition caused by too much uric acid in the body which causes swelling and pain around…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was conducted, documented, and retained to ensure mental health needs were appropriately addressed or provided for 2 of 2 residents (R4, R27) reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: R4 R4's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R4 with admission to facility on 3/10/21 and diagnoses of bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings between emotional highs and lows), depression, diabetes, and delusional disorder. R4's initial Pre-admission Screening (PAS) results and attached letter from Senior Linkage Line, dated 3/10/21, indicated The Senior Linkage Line forwarded the PAS to the county/managed care organization for processing. The PAS is not final until the lead agency sends documentation to the nursing facility. The letter went on to list a lead agency and phone number for the facility to follow up with. R4's entire medical record was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control techniques were implemented during wound care for 2 of 2 residents (R11, R49) who were reviewed for wound care. In addition, the facility failed to comprehensively assess, monitor, and provide necessary care for 1 of 1 residents (R2) with a intrathecal baclofen pump. Findings include: R11 R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R11 with intact cognition, diagnoses of diabetes, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (debilitating lung disease[COPD]), lymphedema (condition that results in swelling of the leg or arm due to blockage in the lymphatic system which is part of the immune system), anxiety, depression, and cellulitis of right lower leg (potentially serious bacterial skin infection). In addition, R11 on oxygen. R11's Diagnosis List, printed 3/14/24, identified R11 with non-pressure chronic ulcer of right lower leg with fat layer exposed, and history…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to provide assistance for hearing appliances for 1 of 1 (R17) residents reviewed who had bilateral hearing aides. Findings include: R17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R17 admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had moderate cognitive impairment, diagnoses of Parkinson's (progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and parts of the body controlled by the nerves), encephalopathy (brain disorder that affects its function), chronic pain, anxiety, dementia, diabetes and depression. In addition, R17 received hospice services. R17's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 5/22/23, indicated R17 triggered for communication impairment. R17's care plan (CP) dated 1/7/22, indicated, [R17] had impaired hearing compensated well with use of bilateral hearing aides. CP intervention include, [R17] requires the following hearing appliances: (hearing aides bilateral). R17's [NAME] with print date of 3/12/24, informed care staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was appropriately administered as well as provide Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ([CPAP]- ventilation machine that administers air via an external device at a predetermined level of pressure) therapy for 1 of 1 residents (R47) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: R47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R47 had intact cognition with no behaviors present. The MDS indicated that R47 received oxygen therapy but did not use a CPAP. The MDS indicated R47 required staff assistance for bathing, dressing, and bed mobility. The facility Standing Orders for Skilled Nursing Facilities dated 1/17/22, indicated that nursing staff could initiate and titrate supplemental oxygen from one to four liters per nasal canula (NC) as needed for dyspnea (shortness of breath), hypoxia (oxygen saturation less than 88 percent), or acute angina (chest pain) to keep oxygen saturations at greater than 88…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed provide appropriate side effect monitoring with psychotropic medication consumption for 1 of 5 residents (R24) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R24 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on assistance with activities for daily living (ADLs). The MDS included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), epilepsy (seizure disorder) and renal insufficiency/renal failure/end-stage renal disease (kidneys no longer adequately filtering waste from the blood). The MDS indicated R24 had hallucinations, delusions and no physical or verbal aggression. R24's physician note, dated 2/7/24, included the following diagnoses; personal history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder recurrent severe with psychotic symptoms, restlessness and agitation, unspecified fall, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 residents (R27) reviewed for medication errors were free of significant medication errors whenwhen R27 didn't receive ordered metoprolol (medication to treat high blood pressure and control heart rate) for 30 days and in addition, R27 didn't receive ordered atorvastatin (medication to treat high blood cholesterol) between 2/13/24 and 3/13/24. Findings include: R27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R27 was cognitively intact and had no issues with mood or behavior. MDS indicated R27 needed assistance to set up her meals, supervision with showers, and was independent with dressing, toileting, bathing, and transfers. R27's Medical Diagnosis report printed 3/13/24, indicated diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (a disease in which the immune system eats away the protective covering of nerves, disrupting the communication between the brain and the body), unspecified psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure dental needs were appropriately acted upon for 1 of 1 residents (R47) reviewed for dental care. Findings include: R47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R47 had intact cognition with no behaviors present. The MDS indicated R47 was diagnosed with heart failure, diabetes, and depression and required setup assistance with oral hygiene. R47's dental progress note dated 1/4/24, indicated that the doctor of dental surgery (DDS) recommended that R47 have five teeth extracted prior to moving forward with a partial denture. R47's dental General Referral dated 1/4/24, indicated that the DDS recommended R47 to see an oral surgeon for extraction of five teeth related to fractured teeth/ root tips that were not restorable. The note also indicated that these teeth were causing R47 pain. R47's progress note dated 2/27/24 at 5:33 p.m., indicated that R47 had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. R47's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records to ensure accurate medication lists, nurse/licensed professional monitoring and interventions were implemented for 2 of 2 residents (R2 and R27) reviewed. Findings include, R27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R27 was cognitively intact and had no issues with mood or behavior. MDS indicated R27 needed assistance to set up her meals, supervision with showers, and was independent with dressing, toileting, bathing, and transfers. R27's Medical Diagnosis report printed 3/13/24 indicated diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (a disease in which the immune system eats away the protective covering of nerves, disrupting the communication between the brain and the body), unspecified psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality), polyneuropathy (simultaneous malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body), generalized anxiety, idiopathic chronic gout (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure binding arbitration agreements were clearly communicated in a form and manner that they understood prior to signing the forms for of 2 of 2 residents (R2, R47) reviewed for binding arbitration agreements. Findings include: R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had intact cognition and diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (A disease that affects central nervous system creating difficulty with sending brain signals to the rest of the body [MS]). Review of R2's signed Arbitration Agreement dated 2/3/22 indicated, Resident and Facility will not be able to bring or start a lawsuit in any court and are giving-up all rights to a jury trial to decide any disputes that Resident may have against Facility or Facility may have against Resident. During interview with R2 on 3/14/23 at 8:45 a.m., R2 was unable to recall signing admission paperwork informing her that she was not required to enter into the binding arbitration agreement as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have a system in place to record accurate narcotic reconciliation to be able to account for all controlled substances for a 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. The facility failed to identify prompt identification of loss or potential diversion of a controlled medication or determine the extent of loss for thirty morphine tablets ordered for R1. Findings include: Upon observation on 3/4/24 at 2:35 p.m. a pharmacy receipt for R1's morphine delivery on 2/16/24 was not found in the facility receipt bin on the wall. The bin had a pile of receipts dated from 1/29/24 - 3/5/24. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 had a Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIMs) score of 10 indicating cognitive impairment. R1 required moderate assistance of one staff member for dressing and hygiene. R1's pertinent diagnoses was metabolic encephalopathy (an imbalance of or reduced oxygen to the brain). R1's physician order dated 2/15/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and records review, the facility failed to thoroughly assess pain and implement orders for pain management for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed who was suffering from headaches and prescribed tramadol. Findings include: R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], showed an admission date of 7/17/23. The MDS indicated R2 had moderate cognitive impairment, with active diagnoses including fractures and other multiple traumas, cancer, hypertension, and dementia. The MDS also indicated R2 was frequently in moderate pain and receiving pain medications. R2's care plan identified R2's alteration in thought processes as evidenced by deficits in memory/recall ability, judgment, decision making, and thought processes. The care plan directed staff to observe, document, and report to medical practitioner any changes in cognitive function. The care plan indicated R2 had potential for actual communication problem with difficulty expressing ideas/wants. The care plan indicated R2's preference to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-12-05 · tag F0570 — widespreadAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident personal fund accounts were insured with adequate surety bond coverage (a contract or promise by a surety or guarantor to pay a certain amount if a second party fails to meet the obligation) to cover the total account balance. This had potential to affect 20 residents identified to have an account with a positive balance. Findings include: The undated facility provided resident fund account record, received on 12/3/24, identified 20 residents who had current fund accounts with a positive balance. The total amount of these accounts was recorded as $27,953.42. A Continuation Certificate dated 4/2/24, indicated the facility had a surety bond in place for up to $25,000.00. During an interview on 12/4/24 at 12:08 p.m., the administrator acknowledged the surety bond would not fully cover the resident's personal fund accounts. The administrator stated cooperate oversaw the surety bond and he would reach out to see if they had an updated version. Evidence of an updated surety bond was not received. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-12-05 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to have a therapeutic recreation director (i.e., activities director) whom was successfully qualified and/or credentialed, as required, to ensure competent assessment and implementation of activities programming within the care center. This had potential to affect all 66 residents at the time of survey. Findings include: R32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R32 had intact cognition. On [DATE] at 5:03 p.m., R32 was interviewed. R32 stated she enjoyed the activities programs during the week but expressed there was not enough of them on weekends adding, On weekends, no. R32 stated she, at times, became bored on the weekends adding she would wander around to find people to converse with mostly. R32's POC Response History, dated [DATE] to [DATE], identified spaces to record what, if any, activities were attended. The listed activities included Arts/Crafts, Bible Study, Comedy, Exercise, Games, and more. However, none was recorded.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-12-05 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the posted nurse staffing information accurately displayed the total number/actual hours worked by the licensed staff for each shift on a daily basis. This had the potential to affect all 66 residents or visitors who wished to review the information. Findings include: The Daily Staff Postings dated 11/19/24 through 12/2/24, included a row titled LPN [licensed practical nurse] but the row did not include a total number or the actual hours worked by LPNs as it did in the rows titled RN [registered nurse] and CNA [certified nursing assistant]. The facility staffing schedules dated 11/19/24 through 12/2/24 included LPN's working on the following days: 11/19/24, 11/20/24, 11/22/24, 11/23/24, 11/24/24, 11/25/24, 11/26/24, 11/27/24, 11/28/24, 11/29/24, and 11/30/24. During an interview on 12/5/24 at 9:37 a.m., the staffing coordinator (SC) stated she oversaw the staff posting. The SC stated after reviewing the staffing schedules and staff postings it looked like the LPN hours were not being separately categorized as they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-03-14 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted on the weekend and in a timely manner at the start of the shift. This had potential to affect all 69 residents, staff, and visitors who could wish to review this information. Findings include: During entrance to the nursing home, on Monday, 3/11/24 at 11:30 a.m., a clear plastic holder was observed attached to the wall to the left of the main reception desk. This contained a document titled, Daily Staff Posting - Woodlyn Heights Health Care Center. However, the document displayed was dated, 3/7/202 [four days prior]. The form contained the actual and total hours of registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, trained medication aides, and certified nursing assistants which was broken down into each respective shift (i.e., day shift, evening shift, night shift). There was no visible nurse staffing information posted or displayed for Friday, 3/8/24, Saturday, 3/9/24, Sunday, 3/10/24, or Monday, 3/11/24. During interview on 3/11/24, at 11:35 a.m., administrative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ACCURA HEALTHCARE — 41 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
The other 40 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEALWOOD ENTERPRISE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/31/2013 |
| GROFF, HOWARD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 09/03/2008 |
| SHERIDAN, GAIL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 09/03/2008 |
| DOLINSKY, MICHAEL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| TURBES, SANDRA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| KLEINSASSER, CORTNEY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2019 |
| AMERICAN HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2019 |
| LENEAVE, TED | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2019 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $467K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245320. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.