Meadow Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 26 beds and averages 18.8 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.94 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.21 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to compressively assess falls for root cause, implement appropriate interventions and follow the care plan to prevent and/or reduce the risk of falls with major injury for 2 of 2 residents (R3 and R2) with history of falls. This resulted in actual harm for R3 when he sustained a hand fracture and lacerations to his face and foot and R2 when she sustained a laceration above the eye that required sutures as a result of a fall. Findings include: R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 had moderately impaired cognition and required staff assistance with toileting, dressing, and transferring, R3's diagnoses included encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function), heart failure, renal disease, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R3's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated [DATE], indicated R3 triggered for cognitive loss/dementia, self-care and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-02-18 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to submit completed and accurate direct care staffing information for 1 of 1 quarters reviewed (Quarter 4), July 1-September 30 2025, to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) according to specifications established by CMS. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 18 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal Report (PBJ) [NAME] Report 1705 D for quarter 4 identified excessively low weekend staffing, one star staffing rating, no RN hours for 11 days in quarter 4 and failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 Hours/Day for 65 days in quarter 4. During an interview with the administrator and Corporate Regional Director (CRD), on 2/18/26 at 9:03 a.m., the administrator stated the previous administrator was submitting the PBJ information until they ended their employment October 2025. The CRD stated the previous administrator had access to the PBJ submission program however she and the current administrator do not. The CRD stated there is a ticket…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy when providing cares for 1 of 1 resident (R17) reviewed for personal privacy. Findings include: R17's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R17 had mild cognitive impairment, required substantial assistance for activities of daily living (ADL), and was dependent on facility staff for transfers, bathing, and personal hygiene. During an interview on 1/21/25 at 9:30 a.m., R17 stated she has been at the facility for 7 months; the blinds in her room have been broken the entire time. R17 states this bothers her because she has her bed baths in her room, and lacks the privacy she wants. The facility has told her the blinds are coming but it has been 7 months since she initially voiced her concern. During observation on 1/21/25 at 9:30 a.m., R17's vertical blinds were missing slats, and the remaining slats were broken in half. During observation on 1/22/25 at 8:42 a.m., R17's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to identify a grievance official to oversee, process, and track grievances presented by residents, resident representatives and visitors. The facility failed to provide information on how to file a grievance or complaint. This had the potential to affect all 21 residents, resident representatives, and visitors Findings include: R8's significant change minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated mild cognitive impairment. R8 is the resident council president and gave permission to review the last 3 months of resident council meeting minutes. During interview with R8 on 1/22/25 at 2:17 p.m., R8 stated the social services director left in November 2024. R8 stated the social services director was the grievance official and residents knew who they could report any grievances to. R8 stated grievances were followed up on frequently prior to the social services director leaving. R8 stated the facility has not designated a new grievance official and residents do…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure dispensed medications in a manner to prevent diversion and/or consumption by others by leaving dispensed medications on top of medication cart. This has the potential to affect residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: R20's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition. R20's diagnoses list included nausea with vomiting and hypomagnesemia (low magnesium level in the blood). R20's physician orders included: -ondasetron (medication used to treat nausea) 4 mg 1 tablet three times a day for nausea and vomiting. -Slo-mag delayed release (magnesium supplement) 71.5-119 mg give 2 tablets by mouth four times a day for hypomagnesemia -Magic cup (high calorie frozen nutritional supplement) three times a day between meals as supplemental snack R172 R172's admission MDS, dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment, wandering significantly intrudes on the privacy of activities of others, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure use of proper personal protective equipment (PPE) during catheter care for 1 of 1 residents (R174) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Findings include: R174's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R174 was cognitively intact and had an indwelling urinary catheter. R174's provider orders included indwelling urinary catheter for urinary retention (a condition that causes difficulty emptying bladder). R174's care plan indicated R174 had an indwelling urinary catheter. During observation and interview on 1/21/25 at 3:04 p.m., R174 confirmed long term catheter use due to history of difficulty with urination. A urinary catheter bag was observed hanging on the left side of R174's recliner. No PPE noted in or around R174's room. A large set of drawers containing disposable PPE gowns was noted down the hall just outside the soiled utility room. During observation and interview on 1/22/25 at 1:37 p.m., nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-22 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review the facility failed to develop, implement, monitor, and evaluate falls quality improvement project (QIP) that was an identified problem-prone area to improve performance and ensure sustainability. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include SEE F689: Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to compressively assess falls for root cause, implement appropriate interventions and follow the care plan to prevent and/or reduce the risk of falls with major injury for 2 of 2 residents (R3 and R2) with history of falls. This resulted in actual harm for R3 when he sustained a hand fracture and lacerations to his face and foot and R2 when she sustained a laceration above the eye that required sutures as a result of a fall. During the facility resident record review on 8/20/24 for resident sample selection revealed from 6/11/24 through 8/20/24, the facility had 29 fall incidents between three residents. R2 had 5 falls in which one fall resulted in a laceration that required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a fall with serious injury with potential neglect was reported to the State Agency (SA) for 2 of 3 residents (R3 and R2) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R3 A Vulnerable Adult Maltreatment Report submitted to the State Agency on [DATE] at 5:45 p.m., alleged caregiver neglect for an incident that had occurred on [DATE] at approximately 5:00 a.m. The report indicated R3 fell on [DATE] and was sent to the emergency department (ED) for a broken finger and again, fell on [DATE] in the morning and was sent to the ED with injuries and died the next day. Further indicated R3 had COVID and was in his room with the door shut and needed staff assistance to transfer. In review of Facility Reported Incidents (FRI), it was not evident R3's fall was reported to the State Agency. R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 had moderately impaired cognition and required staff assistance with toileting, dressing, and transferring, R3's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete an accurate and thorough investigation of falls to determine the root cause, if the care plan was followed, and if the fall was reportable to the State Agency (SA) for 3 of 3 residents (R2, R3, and R4) reviewed for falls. Finding include R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had severe cognitive impairment, no behaviors, required extensive assist of staff with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. R2 used a walker and wheelchair for mobility and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. R2 diagnoses included progressive supranuclear ophthalmoplegia (a rare brain disease that affects walking, balance, eye movements, and swallowing), dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, morbid obesity, restless leg syndrome, diabetes, and a history of falling. R2's care plan last revised on [DATE], identified R2 was at risk for falls due to limited physical mobility. Interventions included to ensure appropriate footwear,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to revise the care plan for 3 of 3 residents (R2) who were reviewed for falls. Findings include: R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had severe cognitive impairment, no behaviors, required extensive assist of staff with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. R2 used a walker and wheelchair for mobility and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. R2 diagnoses included progressive supranuclear ophthalmoplegia (a rare brain disease that affects walking, balance, eye movements, and swallowing), dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, morbid obesity, restless leg syndrome, diabetes, and a history of falling. R2's care plan last revised on 6/12/24, identified R2 was at risk for falls due to limited physical mobility. Interventions included to ensure appropriate footwear, ensure reacher is within reach of resident, [NAME] [sic] (Dycem is a non-slip material) placed under wheelchair cushion to prevent it from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and glove use practices were maintained for 1 of 3 residents (R3) observed during incontinence cares. Findings include: R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R3's diagnoses included medically complex conditions, dementia, and was currently on hospice. In addition, R3's MDS identified R3 was unable to understand or be understood, and was dependent with activities of daily living (ADLs). R3's care plan revised on 4/17/23 indicated R3 had bladder and bowel incontinence related to advanced dementia, functional decline, and impaired mobility. Staff were to check and change every two hours. During an observation on 1/18/24 at 12:18 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-A and NA-B entered R3's room NA-A proceeded to wash her hands at the sink in the room. NA-B did not perform hand hygiene upon entering the room, and grabbed gloves and put them in her scrub pocket. NA-A and NA-B put the transfer sling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ACCURA HEALTHCARE — 41 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $194K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN