Lake Andes Senior Living

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 39.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.549 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-09-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the provider failed to ensure care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice regarding blood sugar monitoring, interventions, and notification to the resident's physician for four of seven diabetic residents (3, 20, 22, and 38) that experienced blood sugar levels outside of the normal range. Interventions and timely follow-up to those blood sugars was not consistently identified in their records. Finding include: Notice: Notice of immediate jeopardy was given verbally and in writing on 9/5/24 at 11:55 a.m. to executive director (ED) A and director of nursing (DON) B of the immediate jeopardy related to F684 when the provider failed to ensure quality of care regarding hypoglycemic (lower than standard blood sugar level range) and hyperglycemic (higher than standard blood sugar level range) risks for diabetic residents. On 9/5/24 at 11:55 a.m. ED A and DON B were asked for an immediate removal plan. Plan: On 9/5/2024, diabetic residents #3, #20, #22, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the provider failed to ensure the management COVID-19 cases with 12 of 12 sampled residents (5, 6, 8, 10, 19, 20, 29, 31, 32, 33, 38, and 89) implement appropriate precautions, and prevent further transmission of the disease, including ensuring staff demonstrated the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) (e.g. N95 face masks and gowns), and proper hand hygiene between residents to prevent the spread of COVID-19 infection. Findings include: Notice: On 8/27/24: *At 11:30 a.m., immediate jeopardy was identified related to the prevention and control of resident COVID-19 infections at F880. *At 1:25 p.m., notice of immediate jeopardy was provided verbally and in writing to executive director (ED) A, director of nursing (DON) B, and regional nurse consultant (RNC) S. An immediate jeopardy removal plan was requested at that time. The survey team exited the building at 2:00 p.m. Plan: On 8/27/2024, all covid positive residents were moved in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the provider's South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incident (FRI), interviews, observation, and record review, the provider failed to keep one of one resident (1) safe from elopement. Findings include: 1. Review of the provider's SD DOH FRI revealed: *On 10/1/24 at 7:02 p.m., Resident 1 walked to the front door of the facility, pushed on the door, and exited the facility without supervision. *He was wearing a Wanderguard (a wearable device that alarms when individual is within proximity of an alarmed door and/or crosses the threshold of alarmed door). -The Wanderguard functioned appropriately and alarmed when the resident exited the building. *At the time the resident exited the building, all staff were assisting other residents. *CNA G spotted resident 1 across the street at a neighboring house. *CNA G brought the resident back to the facility at 7:07 p.m. *Resident 1 was assessed by licensed practical nurse (LPN) D, the resident was not injured, and his vital signs were within normal limits. *Resident 1's daughter was notified, as well…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the provider failed to ensure kitchen equipment surfaces were clean and food was stored under clean and sanitary conditions in one of one freezer.Findings include: 1. Observation on 8/18/25 at 4:45 in the kitchen revealed the top of the dishwasher had a buildup of an unidentified substance such as dirt, dust, or dried cleaning chemicals. 2. Observation on 8/18/25 at 4:50 p.m. in the kitchen revealed:*The freezer had dirt particles and unidentified spilled material covering a large portion of the bottom.*Single serving ice cream cups were stored on the same shelf as frozen bacon.*Dirt build-up around appliances and preparation tables on the floor.-Tables and appliances had not been moved to clean around and under them. 3. Observations were made on 8/19/25 at 8:30 a.m., 8/20/25 at 10:40 a.m., and the morning of 8/21/25 at 10:00 a.m. of the top of the dishwasher and the surface had not been cleaned and remained in the same condition as 8/18/25. 4. Interview on 8/21/25 at 10:05 a.m. with dietary aide I revealed:*She had been employed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, provider failed to ensure smoking evaluations were completed quarterly for one of seven sampled resident (12) who continued to smoke at the facility. Findings include:1.Review of resident 12's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed:*She was admitted on [DATE].*She had a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia.*Her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score on 7/17/25 was 7 indicating she had severely impaired cognition.*Her current care plan had a focus area of smoking cigarettes and is at risk for injury related to smoking initiated on 2/1/24.*Interventions in place were:-Assist outside and ensure clothing is appropriate for weather.-At times is not compliant with order to smoke only three cigarettes a day.-Complete smoking evaluation on admission, quarterly, and prn (as needed) to determine if resident 12 able to smoke independently or requires staff assistance.-Ensure resident 12 is aware/compliant with facility smoking policy.-Keep…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the provider failed to ensure infection control practices were followed by allowing one of one sampled resident's (5) oxygen tubing to sit on the floor.Findings include:1. Observation on 8/19/25 at 9:13 a.m. revealed resident 5's nasal cannula [the part of oxygen tubing that touches the resident's face] was on the floor while she was in bed watching TV.2. Observation on 8/19/25 at 9:50 a.m. revealed resident 5 was no longer in her room, her nasal cannula was still on the floor.3. Observation and interview on 8/20/25 at 9:45 a.m. revealed resident 5's nasal cannula was lying on the floor.*Resident 5 reported that sometimes staff roll up her oxygen tubing/nasal cannula and place it on the machine, sometimes they allowed it to be on the floor.*She said the oxygen tubing was not replaced when it is found on the floor.*The oxygen tubing was dated 8/13/25. 4. Interview on 8/21/25 at 10:30 a.m. with ADON B revealed:*When not in use, oxygen tubing should be rolled up and hung on the oxygen machine for storage.*It should never be on the floor.*If nasal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the provider failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment was maintained for all 39 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation on 8/27/24 at 12:10 p.m. revealed: *The heat register outside of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was rusted and not cleanable. *The storage cove outside room [ROOM NUMBER] contained: -An oxygen concentrator. -An locked out Volaro lift. -A rolling desk chair. -A shelf contained: --Eight individual incontinent undergarments. --An open package of bathroom hygiene wipes. --An open package of incontinent undergarments. --A sheepskin blanket/bed pad. --A sign that indicated enhanced barrier precautions. Observation on 9/3/24 at 9:00 a.m. of the east hallway revealed there was a cloth chair that had a stain on the seat. Observation on 9/3/24 at 9:47 a.m. of the dining room revealed: *The west side Fujitsu air conditioning unit had 21 brown drip stains on it. *The east side Fujitsu air conditioning unit had four…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview, staff schedule review, and payroll record review, the provider failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was scheduled for eight consecutive hours for two of four weekends in May 2023. Findings include: 1. Interview on 9/4/24 at 3:03 p.m. with executive director A regarding the required eight hours of RN coverage on a daily basis revealed he: *Was responsible for filing the payroll-based journal (PBJ) reports. -He began submitting the facility's payroll-based journal information starting with Quarter 3 of 2024. *Had been aware they did not have an RN working in the facility on 5/7/24, 5/27/24, and 5/28/24. *Stated they always had a nurse in the building, but not always an RN on weekends. 2. Review of the provider's staff schedule and payroll record for May 2023 revealed they did not have RN coverage on the following dates: *Sunday 5/7/24. *Saturday 5/27/24. *Sunday 5/28/24.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure food items for resident consumption were appropriately labeled and stored in a safe and sanitary manner for the following: *Three of five freezers that contained food items that were not labeled or dated. *One of one resident refrigerator that contained food items that were not labeled, dated, or discarded by the use-by date. 1. Observation on 8/27/24 at 8:15 a.m. of the lower-level food storage area revealed: *A freezer labeled Freezer 1 contained two bags of fruit that were opened and not labeled or dated. *A freezer labeled Freezer 2 contained: -One bag of waffles that was open and not dated. -One bag of French Toast that was opened and not dated. -Three bags of frozen omelets that were not labeled or dated. -Garlic bread that was open and not dated. *An unlabeled freezer contained two bags of frozen vegetables that were open and not labeled or dated. 2. Observation on 8/27/24 at 10:49 a.m. of the resident refrigerator located in the therapy room revealed: *What appeared to be fruit in a plastic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-05 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, policy review, and job description review the provider failed to ensure the facility was operated and administered by executive director (ED) A and director of nursing (DON) B, in a manner that ensured the safety and overall well-being of all 39 residents in the facility. Those areas included: *Maintaining an effective infection control program that included following appropriate infection control procedures for the prevention and management of COVID-19 infections which included: -The implementation of appropriate precautions, including enhanced barrier precautions. -Ensuring staff demonstrated the proper use of personal protective equipment. -Hand hygiene after caring for infected residents. *Ensuring quality of care regarding hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic risks for four of seven insulin-dependent diabetic residents (3, 20, 22, and 38) which included interventions and physician notification according to blood glucose parameters set by the resident's physician. *Ensuring the facility was safe, clean, comfortable, and had a homelike…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and policy review, the provider failed to implement an effective quality assurance process improvement (QAPI) program that focused on identifying and improving systemic problems. Findings include: 1. Interview on 9/5/24 at 4:44 p.m. with executive director (ED) A revealed: *Regarding their QAPI Program: -The committee met monthly with the medical director in attendance. -They had developed a performance improvement plan (PIP) for falls which included reviewing interventions that were put in place. *Regarding their infection prevention & control program and their 5/6/24 COVID-19 Outbreak policy: -He agreed that they were currently experiencing a COVID-19 outbreak in the facility. -He was aware that they had allowed residents with confirmed COVID-19 infection to share a room with residents that did not have that respiratory pathogen, increasing the likelihood of the transmission of COVID-19 infections. -He thought they were doing what was best for the residents by allowing the residents who were not infected to remain in the room with a resident with confirmed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-05 · tag F0944 — widespread
  Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on employee file review the provider failed to ensure that seven of seven sampled employees (B, C, J, P, Q, X, and Y) had been educated on the quality assurance and performance improvement process of the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of employee B, C, J, P, Q, X, and Y's files revealed there was no documentation they had not received the mandatory quality assurance and performance improvement education per the regulation for an extended survey. .

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure dignity was maintained for two of three sampled residents (19 and 34) who had urinary catheter drainage bags that were not covered. Findings include: 1. Observation on 8/27/24 at 11:51 a.m. with resident 34 revealed: *He was in his wheelchair in the dining room with his urinary catheter drainage bag hanging under the wheelchair. *The urinary catheter drainage bag was not covered and contained visible urine. Observation on 8/29/24 at 8:43 a.m. with resident 34 revealed: *He was in the living room near the television with his urinary catheter drainage bag hanging under his wheelchair. *The urinary catheter drainage bag was not covered and contained visible urine. 2. Observation on 9/3/24 at 2:55 p.m. with resident 19 revealed: *He was in bed with a urinary catheter drainage bag hanging from the bed bar on the left side of his bed. *The urinary catheter drainage bag was not covered and half-filled with visible urine. *The urinary catheter drainage bag was visible from the hallway. 3. Interview on 9/03/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$102,440 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $10,839 — penalty dated 2024-10-16
• $91,601 — penalty dated 2024-09-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ACCURA HEALTHCARE — 41 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $187K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SD