No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Accura Healthcare of Marshalltown

2401 South Second Street, Marshalltown, IA 50158 · For profit - Corporation · 84 certified beds · (641) 752-1553 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$9,350 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $9,350 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-02)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
303 Nicholas Dr · (641) 752-0099 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
303 Nicholas Dr · (641) 752-4115 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.1 mi
2405 S Center St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
310 W Merle Hibbs Blvd · (641) 754-5715 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased23.6%17.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.0%4.6%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%1.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.2%4.2%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.9%3.8%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened31.6%16.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.4%20.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.1%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.2%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table33.9%19.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.8%2.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%73.3%79.4%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.08U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.0%CMS range 41.7–59.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 7.4–16.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.651.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.15
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.60
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.10
RN hoursweekends
42.3%
Total nursing turnover
83.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 58.4 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.15 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.16 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-12)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-10-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). As a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) finished giving Resident #1 his bath, the CNA turned the water to cold and purposely sprayed him. Resident #1 became angry, grabbed the shower head and slapped it against the wall. The facility reported a census of 46 residents.Findings included:Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance with showering. The MDS included diagnoses of Alzheimer's, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and anxiety disorder.The facility's Nursing Facility Abuse Prevention, Identification, Investigation, and Reporting Policy, updated 10/19/22, stated all residents had the right to be free from abuse. The policy defined abuse as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-11-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, primary physician and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were given medications as prescribed by the physician, when a nurse administered the wrong medications to the wrong resident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #52). The facility reported a census of 52 residents. Findings Include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #52 dated 10/18/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition for decision making. The MDS revealed he had diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), arthritis, compression fracture, and neoplasm of the prostate. The resident received an anticoagulant, diuretic and opioid during the 7-day observation period. The Care Plan initiated 10/12/23 directed staff to medicate Resident #52 as directed by the doctor. Review of Resident #52's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated October 2023, the resident received his morning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the nursing schedule, staff interviews, Payroll Based Journal Data Report, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) in the facility for eight (8) consecutive hours per day for 19 days between December 1, 2025 - March 8, 2026. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's nursing schedules for December 2025 lacked RN coverage for the following dates: 6th, 7th, 20th, 21st, 25th, and 31st.Review of the facility's nursing schedules for January 2026 lacked RN coverage for the following dates: 1st, 3rd, 4th, 17th, 18th and 31st. Review of the facility's nursing schedules for February 2026 lacked RN coverage for the following dates: 1st, 12th, 14th, 15th, 24th, and 28th. Review of the facility's nursing schedules for March from the 1st through the 8th lacked RN coverage on the 1st. The Email communication on 3/9/26 at 2:53 PM, the Facility Administrator acknowledged the lack of consecutive 8-hour RN coverage and stated, they typically didn't have RN coverage every other weekend.Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to report a resident-to-resident altercation for 1 of 3 altercations reviewed (Resident #10 and Resident #43). The facility failed to report when Resident #43 yelled at Resident #10 that she better not go into his room again or Resident #43 would give Resident #10 something to cry about. The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include: 1. Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) documented a score was 6 out of 15, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS listed Resident #10 as independent for mobility in a manual wheelchair. The MDS included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and non-Alzheimer's dementia, pseudobulbar affect (a brain condition in which a person experiences sudden, intense, and uncontrollable episodes of laughter or crying that are disproportionate or unrelated to their actual feelings), anxiety and depression.A Progress Note written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to actively assist and plan a discharge from the facility for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #43). Resident #43 admitted to the facility for skilled care after a stroke, he desired to discharge from the facility. The facility could not provide documentation regarding active discharge planning with Resident #43 from 12/19/25 to 3/10/26. The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include:A MDS dated [DATE], documented that Resident #43's diagnoses included stroke, depression, and hemiplegia (one sided paralysis). Resident #43 had a BIMS score of 14 out of 15, which indicated intact cognitive functioning. Resident #43 was independent for mobility in a manual wheelchair. Resident #43 was independent for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, upper and lower body dressing, putting on taking off footwear and personal hygiene. He was independent for rolling left and right, sitting to lying and lying to sitting on the side of bed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide ongoing restorative services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #2). Resident #2 did not receive Passive Range of Motion (PROM) on a consistent basis, nor did he receive PROM per his plan of care directions. The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings include: Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] at, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) documented a score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS listed Resident #2 as dependent on staff for toileting, lower body dressing, and putting on and taking off footwear. diagnoses for included non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, paraplegia, pressure ulcer injury, and depression. This resident had a pressure reducing device for his chair and his bed. It documented he had 0 days of PROM provided during the lookback period. A Care Plan initially dated 10/16/25, directed staff Resident #2 had an active restorative program. The goal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to provide to the resident or their representative a summary of the baseline care plan for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #2). The facility reported a census of 54 residents. Findings include:Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).The Clinical Census revealed Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE]. A facility form titled Baseline Resident Care Plan dated 8/22/25 lacked documentation a copy of the baseline care plan was given or reviewed with Resident #2 or the resident representative. The baseline care plan lacked Resident #2 and/or the resident representative signature and date.On 11/20/25 at 9:30 AM, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for 1 of 3 resident reviewed (Resident #2) for Physician orders. The facility reported a census of 54 residents. Findings includes: Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, bacteremia (blood stream infection), chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).The Clinical Census revealed Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] for a Medicare Part A stay.The August Medication Administration Record (MAR) directed staff to administer Daptomycin 830 mg (milligrams) (a powerful antibiotic used to treat serious infections caused by gram positive bacteria) intravenously (giving medication into a vein) one time a day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, hospital nurse interview and resident interview, the facility failed to administer oxygen per Physician orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #2) for respiratory services. The facility reported a census of 54 residents. Findings Include: Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, bacteremia (blood stream infection), chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).The Care Plan with a target date of 2/13/26 documented Resident #2 had a diagnosis of COPD and hypertension and required the use of oxygen at 2 liters per minute. The care plan directed staff to make sure Resident #2 had the oxygen on and that he was using it correctly.The Physician Order dated 8/22/25 directed staff to administer oxygen at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Findings included:Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance with showering. The MDS included diagnoses of Alzheimer's, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and anxiety disorder.The facility's Nursing Facility Abuse Prevention, Identification, Investigation, and Reporting Policy, updated 10/19/22, directed the facility to report allegations of abuse to the State Agency (SA) within 2 hours. The Health Status Note dated 6/17/25 at 5:00 PM indicated a staff member reported around 11:45 AM another staff member stated, watch this, then proceeded to spray Resident #1 with cold water. Afterwards, Resident #1 grabbed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse and separate an alleged perpetrator of abuse from residents in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 46 residents.Findings included:Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance with showering. The MDS included diagnoses of Alzheimer's, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and anxiety disorder.The facility's Nursing Facility Abuse Prevention, Identification, Investigation, and Reporting Policy, updated 10/19/22, instructed the facility to implement measures to prevent further potential abuse such as suspending the employee. The Health Status Note dated 6/17/25 at 5:00 PM indicated a staff member reported around 11:45 AM another staff member stated, watch this,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to store and/or handle controlled medications in accordance with professional standards to ensure medications were secure for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for the storage of controlled substances (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 46 residents.Findings:Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/5/25, identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, and hallucinations.The facility policy Controlled Substances updated 10/19/22, directed when a nurse received a controlled medication, the nurse needed to fill out the top of the controlled drug administration record including the first line on the section that counted the medications. They did this to indicate who signed in the medication from the pharmacy.Resident #2's August Medication Administration Record (MAR) listed an order dated 7/14/25 for lorazepam (used to treat anxiety) 0.5 milligrams (mg) twice daily for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan, the facilities past surveys, and staff interview, the facility failed to correct their own deficiencies for 3 of 15 areas of concern. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: The facility QAPI Plan dated 5/23/23 documented the purpose as to identify and correct quality deficiencies as well as opportunities for improvement in the lives of nursing home residents with a systematic approach. To do this, all employees will participate in ongoing QAPI efforts which support our mission. Principals of the QAPI system included, in summary: a. The outcome of QAPI is for resident quality of care and quality of life. b. Support performance improvement by encouraging our employees to support each other and be accountable for their own professional performance and practice c. Focus on systems and processes, emphasis to identify system gaps d. Make decisions based on data includes input and experiences of others e. Identify root causes of concerns, to monitor and evaluate activities f.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interviews, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to be respectful and ensure residents' dignity for 5 of 21 residents reviewed (Residents #9, #13, #18, #22, and #28). The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. During an interview on 4/21/25 at 12:38 PM, Resident #9's reported Staff A, the previous Director of Nursing (DON), persisted and argued with her when she didn't want to take a shower. Resident #9's stated Staff A called another provider to convince her to shower and the provider didn't side with Staff A. 2. Resident #13's MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. During an interview on 4/23/25 at 5:40 PM, Resident #13 recalled Staff A argued while at the nurse's station and told Resident #13 to go to their room. 3. Resident #18's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, Facility Assessment, Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide enough staff to care for residents in a timely manner for 5 of 17 residents reviewed (Residents #13, #30, #34, #28, and #162). The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 4/21/25 at 2:45 PM, Resident #13's reported it can take staff 30 minutes up to an hour to answer her call light. She reported the second shift took the longest to answer her call lights. She added she used the clock on the wall to know the length of time. 2. Resident #30's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] with Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 indicated moderate cognitive impairment. On 4/21/25 at 3:48 PM Resident #30 reported he liked to stay up late at night and some of the night staff try to get him to go to bed. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to label food and drinks with dates after opening, discard product after recommended date, ensure a male staff member wore a beard net, and failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to reduce the risk of contamination and food borne illness. The facility identified a census of 56 residents. Findings include: 1. An initial kitchen tour conducted on 4/21/25 at 9:45 AM, revealed the following items stored in the refrigerator ready for service: a. 1-quart tomato juice - open/not dated b. 1-quart silk soy milk - open/not dated c. 1-quart grape juice - open/not dated d. Container of open apricots - dated 4/13/25 e. Container of open ham salad - dated 4/13/25 f. Container of open mixed berries - dated 4/17/25 2. The kitchen's milk cooler revealed the following stored items: a. 1-gallon white milk - open/not dated b. 1-gallon chocolate mile - open/not dated c. 1-gallon orange juice - open/not dated On 4/21/25 during the initial kitchen tour, observed Staff I, Dietary Aide, with a beard and not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to supervise one out of two residents reviewed for elopement (Resident #161). The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings Included: Resident #161's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. Resident #161 walked independently with cane. The MDS included diagnoses of Alzheimer's dementia and heart failure. The Care Plan Focus dated 3/10/25, identified Resident #161's confusion related to Alzheimer's. The Interventions directed the following: a. Directed to monitor Resident #161's behavior, redirect him as needed (PRN). b. Remind him as needed as he forgets. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 3/21/25, reflected Resident #161 admitted to the facility from home as the family could no longer care for him safely due to his diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia. He wandered and needed supervision to keep him safe.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain catheter tubing off the floor for 4 out of 4 days reviewed for one out of two residents reviewed (Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. Resident #12 required staff assistance of 1 with toileting hygiene and 2 staff with transferring. The MDS included diagnoses of neurogenic bladder (problems with the bladder as the nerves don't function properly), and diabetes mellitus (DM). The Care Plan Focus dated 8/21/23, identified Resident #12's used an indwelling urinary catheter due to wound healing. The Goal reflected she wouldn't develop a urinary tract infection(UTI). Resident #12's Urine culture dated 3/24/25, revealed greater than (>) 100,000 colony forming unit (CFU) per milliliter (ml) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for an antipsychotic medication for 1 out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents #10). The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS identified Resident #10's as independent for bed mobility and transfers. Resident #10's MDS included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, non Alzheimer's disease, cerebral palsy, psychotic disorder, and other sexual disorders. The MDS documented Resident #10 took an antipsychotic during the 7-day lookback period. The Care Plan Focus revised 12/18/24 reflected Resident #10 took antipsychotic medication for Alzheimer's dementia and sexual behaviors. The Interventions directed staff to send the Pharmacist's GDR recommendations to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide Occupational Therapy (OT) per Physician order and failed to start Physical Therapy (PT) in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #1) for therapy services. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: Resident #13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS identified Resident #13 as independent with bed mobility. Resident #13 required supervision or touching assistance from 1 staff member with transfers, toilet use, and ambulation. The MDS described Resident #13 as ambulatory and could walk 10 feet. They required a wheelchair for locomotion. Resident #13's MDS included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), diabetes mellitus, and muscle weakness. An Incident Report dated 1/11/25 at 10:25 AM reflected Resident #13 fell in her room when she walked from the bathroom.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) while doing wound care by not wearing the required person protective equipment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #15) observed for wound care. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: Resident #15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Resident #15 required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility. The MDS listed Resident #15 as dependent on staff for transfers. Resident #15's MDS included diagnoses of anemia (low iron levels in the blood), hypertension (high blood pressure), renal (kidney) disease, diabetes mellitus, and non Alzheimer's dementia. The MDS reflected Resident #15's had a diabetic foot ulcer. The MDS documented Resident #15 had a pressure reducing device in their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct eligibility screening, offer, and provide education related to the pneumococcal (pneumonia) immunization. In addition, the facility failed to document the vaccine consent or refusal for the pneumococcal immunization for 1 of 5 resident reviewed (Resident #47) for immunizations. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: Resident #47's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, and hypertension (high blood pressure). The MDS listed Resident #47's pneumococcal vaccine as up to date. Resident #47's Clinical Census reviewed 4/23/25 listed an admission date of 1/18/24. Resident #47's Immunizations reviewed 4/26/25 reflected she received the pneumococcal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    On 1/9/25 at 10:11 AM, witnessed Resident #2 sitting in the sun room near the nurse's station in a power wheelchair. The power wheelchair had black electrical tape on the left arm rest by the cup holder. Resident #2 acknowledged they had the black electrical tape to hold the cup holder on the arm rest. Based on observation, facility policy review, resident, and staff interview, the facility failed to keep a resident's equipment clean and in good repair for 4 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents #13, #5, #15, and #2). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: On 1/9/25 at 11:00 AM, observed Resident #13's wheelchair with the right arm covered in torn black vinyl. The edges looked torn with exposed foam. On 1/9/25 at 11:15 AM, witnessed Resident #15's wheelchair with their right arm rest with torn vinyl and wrapped with clear plastic tape. On 1/9/25 at 11:20 AM, saw Resident #5's wheelchair with bilateral wheelchair arm rests covered with torn vinyl, exposed foam, and rough edges. On 1/12/25 at 11:00 AM, observed Resident #15's wheelchair continued to have clear…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical document review, facility policy review, resident, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide showers per the residents' request for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #6, #1, #14, and #7) reviewed. The facility identified a census was 61 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], reflected they could understand others and they could understand them. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #6 required substantial to maximum assistance with personal hygiene and shower/bathing. The MDS included diagnoses of anemia (low blood iron level), hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety, depression, renal insufficiency (impaired kidney function), renal failure and Bell's Palsy (a condition that causes temporary weakness or paralysis of the muscles in the face). Interview on 1/12/25 at 12:00 PM, Resident #6 reported they only get one shower a week and would like to have a bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident, and staff interview the facility failed to provide residents with limited mobility services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve their mobility with the maximum practicable independence for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #13, #6, #5 and #1) reviewed. The facility identified a census of 61 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Resident #13 required substantial/maximal to total assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS included diagnoses of heart failure (impaired heart performance affecting the pumping of the heart), hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder (mood disorder) and weakness. The MDS reflected Resident #7 didn't have documentation they received a restorative nursing programs in the lookback period. The Care Plan Focus dated 5/19/22 indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #2's MDS assessment dated [DATE] listed an admission date of 9/3/24 from home. The MDS identified a BIMS score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (an autoimmune disorder that affects the nervous system and causes inflammation with damage to the protective covering of the nerves), depression, and adjustment disorder (excessive reactions to stress that involve negative thoughts, strong emotions, and changes in behavior) with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct. Staff J, Director of Nursing (DON), signed the MDS indicating completion on 12/10/24. The Educational Counseling Form signed 10/7/24 by Staff J and the Administrator reflected Staff J received educational counseling related to being kind and considerate toward residents and staff members. Staff J agreed to remain professional and respectful when communicating with them. The Social Services Note dated 10/9/24 at 10:45 AM indicated on 10/8/24 at approximately 5:29 PM, the Administrator, Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed an admission date of 6/26/23 from a short-term general hospital. The MDS identified they had a memory problem and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS included diagnoses of unspecified severe dementia with psychotic disturbance, cerebral atherosclerosis (the hardening, thickening, and narrowing of arteries in the brain due to plaque buildup inside the artery walls), incontinence of feces (poop) and urinary incontinence. The MDS indicated Resident #3 had risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Resident #3 had one or more unhealed pressure ulcers/injuries. The MDS reflected Resident #3 had a stage 2 pressure ulcer present on admission/entry. The Weekly Pressure Injury Report listed the date of onset as 11/1/24 of a Stage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews the facility failed to operate the full-body mechanical lift (lift) by allowing workers under the age of 18 to operate the lifts without adult supervision. The facility reported a census of 61. Findings Include: Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #6 required substantial/maximal to total assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident #6 had a functional limitation in range of motion to upper and lower extremity on one side. The MDS included diagnoses of stroke, peripheral vascular disease (impaired blood vessels in the extremities), hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body), and renal insufficiency (impaired kidney function). The Care plan Focus dated 10/14/20 indicated Resident #6 had an ADL deficit due to left sided hemiparesis. The Interventions directed she required assistance from 2 staff with the lift for all transfers. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-05 · tag F0839 — isolated
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff certified in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed the procedure for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for initiation of CPR (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of coronary artery disease (CAD impaired blood vessels to the heart), hypertension (high blood pressure), and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). The Care Plan Focus dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 requested CPR. The Goal identified Resident #2's health care choice would be followed. The Iowa Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (IPOST) signed by Resident #2 on [DATE] and the physician on [DATE] reflected Resident #2 desired CPR/Attempt Resuscitation. The Health Status Note dated [DATE] at 3:30 PM indicated the staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, facility documents, and policy review, the dietary staff failed to label and store food items in order to maintain food quality and reduce the risk of contamination and food borne illness. The facility also failed to ensure resident dishes and kitchen equipment reached the appropriate sanitizing temperature when utilizing the dish machine to reduce the risk of bacteria growth and cross contamination. The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: Initial tour of the main kitchen on 7/22/24 at 10:15 AM revealed the following concerns: a. July 2024's dish machine temperature log lacked entries for seven days, two of the three required entries for four days, and one of the three required entries for one day. b. Several labels reflecting outdated food items found in the cooler: i. Squirt bottle of ranch dated 7/8/24 ii. Squirt bottle of French dated 6/30/24 iii. Bag of bacon bits dated 7/13/24 c. Four of five plastic containers of cereal didn't have a label or had an outdated label d. Plastic containers under the prep table had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and facility policy review, the facility failed to screen for eligibility, offer, provide education and document vaccine consent or refusal for the COVID 19 (coronavirus disease) immunization for 3 of 5 resident reviewed (Resident #23, #43, #22). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessment identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #23 had received a COVID vaccination on 8/11/22. The clinical record lacked documentation of education with a consent or refusal provided to Resident #23 for an additional COVID-19 vaccination after 8/11/22. Review of the CDC recommendations for adults aged 65 years and older recommended individuals to get one updated COVID 19 vaccine followed by one additional dose of an updated COVID 19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately assess residents for the need of safety smoking equipment for two of three residents reviewed for smoking (Residents #22 and #56). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #56's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated they had unclear speech and usually made themselves understood. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #56 utilized a wheelchair. The MDS included diagnoses of tobacco use, non Alzheimer's dementia, stroke, other psychoactive substance abuse (uncomplicated), and unspecified disorder of psychological development. The Care Plan Focus dated 7/1/24 indicated that smoking is important to Resident #56. The Interventions directed the staff to assist her with proper supplies to prevent smoking related injuries. The Smoking Assessment completed 7/1/24 assessed Resident #56…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered Care Plan for 1 of 16 residents reviewed (Residents #56), regarding the use and need of a wander guard due to history of exit seeking. The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: Resident #56's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated they had unclear speech and usually made themselves understood. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #5 didn't exhibit wandering behaviors. Resident #56 utilized a wheelchair. The MDS included diagnoses of tobacco use, non Alzheimer's dementia, stroke, other psychoactive substance abuse (uncomplicated), and unspecified disorder of psychological development. The Care Plan with a target date of 7/7/24 lacked information related to Resident #56 wandering or the need for a wander guard. The clinical record review completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on direct observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, and document review the facility failed to provide and document restorative cares for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #7, #24, and #43). The facility reported a census of 53. Findings include: 1. Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #7 required full assistance for toilet use and transfers, and required maximal assistance for bed mobility. The MDS recorded Resident #7 didn't have impaired range of motion (ROM) and used a manual wheelchair for mobility. The MDS included diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, and obesity. Resident #7 started Occupational Therapy (OT) on 6/14/24. Resident #7 received restorative nursing program (RNP) for 0 days in the 30-day look back period. The Care Plan Focus dated 2/12/24 reflected Resident #7 had an activities of daily living (ADL) deficit due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, observations, and policy review the facility failed to implement consistent supplement serving amounts for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #43) for nutrition and weight loss. The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: Resident #43's MDS assessment dated [DATE] listed an admission date of 3/9/23. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #43 required supervision and touch assistance with eating. In addition, Resident #43 needed extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. The MDS included diagnoses of anemia, hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure (heart muscle does not pump enough blood), renal disease, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), non Alzheimer's disease, malnutrition, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and anoxic brain damage (lack of oxygen to the brain). The MDS reflected Resident #43 didn't have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices in order to prevent and control the onset and spread of infection within the facility by not wearing the required personal protection equipment and rinsing resident equipment after use for one of one resident observed (Resident #52). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #52's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #52 required total staff assistance for toilet use and personal hygiene. The MDS reflected Resident #52 had a urinary catheter. The MDS included diagnoses of non Alzheimer's dementia, metabolic encephalopathy (swelling on the brain due to imbalances in the body), and urinary retention. The MDS listed active infections of septicemia (blood infection) and urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, resident representative interview and staff interviews the facility failed to provide notification of changes for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (#24). The facility reported a census of 52 Residents. Findings Include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #24 dated 8/10/23 documented diagnoses included renal failure, dependence on renal dialysis, malignant neoplasm of colon and bipolar. The MDS relayed Resident #24 has serious mental illness. The Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicated no cognitive impairment. The Electronic Profile Record updated 1/1/23 for Resident #24 revealed resident has an assigned Guardian as responsible party contact for financial and healthcare issues. The Care Plan, last review date 8/23/23 documented Resident #24 at risk for weight loss, goal to consume 50% of most meals. Staff directed to monitor weight, nutrition and hydration, to assess nutritional status and educate on diet guidelines and effects of not following the diet. The Progress Notes dated 9/29/2023 at 3:42 PM, revealed a Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident, family, and staff interviews, and facility admission Agreement review, the facility failed to ensure adequate provisions for housekeeping in a resident room (Resident #30) and failed to create homelike environment with clean carpets throughout the halls and common areas. The facility reported a census of 52 Findings Include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #30 revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating the resident's cognition intact On 11/1/23 at 2:00 PM, Resident#30 reported their roommate went to the hospital on [DATE] and the dried urine still on the floor next to the bed. Resident #30 reported cleanliness is an issue they wanted addressed. On 11/1/23 at 4:04 PM, Resident #30 relayed his roommate had been gone since 10/29/23 and voiced had thought roommate spilled the urine container on the floor pointing to the dried, colored soiled floor. On 11/2/23 at 10:50 AM, observed the floor remained unclean with soiled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and review of the Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 Manual, the facility failed to complete a Comprehensive Assessment after a significant change for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Hospice (Resident #20). The facility reported a census of 52 residents. Findings Include: The Admitting Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #20's diagnoses included heart failure, diabetes, osteoporosis, and osteomyelitis. A Quarterly MDS with initiation date 11/25/23 for Resident #20, documented status in progress, there was not a Significant Change Assessment to address the change to Hospice Care. The MDS tracking in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident #20 lacked a Significant Change Assessment for the Hospice admission. The Progress Note dated 10/1/23, documented a Hospice visit with resident and family, admitted resident #20 to Hospice. The Care Plan initiated 8/21/23 for Resident #20 was updated with special…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-07-25 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing information. The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: On 7/23/24 at 11:50 AM, observed the facility didn't have the daily nurse staffing information posted. On 7/23/24 at 12:00 PM, The Administrator acknowledged and confirmed the facility didn't post the daily nurse staffing information and that they didn't have the information readily accessible to residents and visitors. The Administrator reported they kept the daily nurse schedules in a binder at the nurses' station. The Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) reported the facility would correct the issue and post the daily nurse staffing information. On 7/23/24 at 1:00 PM, The Administrator reported the facility didn't have a policy regarding the daily nurse staffing postings. He stated the facility follows the standard of care in which this case the facility didn't.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$9,350 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $9,350 — penalty dated 2023-11-02
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-28 for 7 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ACCURA HEALTHCARE — 41 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
The other 40 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aberdeen Health And RehabAberdeen, SD 1 of 5Accura HealthCare of TekamahTekamah, NE 1 of 5Accura Healthcare of CarrollCarroll, IA 1 of 5Accura Healthcare of Newton East, LLCNewton, IA 1 of 5Accura Healthcare of O'NeillO' Neill, NE 1 of 5Accura Healthcare of Pleasantville, LLCPleasantville, IA 1 of 5Accura Healthcare of ShenandoahShenandoah, IA 1 of 5Green Lea Senior LivingMabel, MN 1 of 5Lake Andes Senior LivingLake Andes, SD 1 of 5Shell Rock Senior LivingShell Rock, IA 2 of 5Accura Healthcare of Cascade LLCCascade, IA 2 of 5Accura Healthcare of CrestonCreston, IA 2 of 5Accura Healthcare of FranklinFranklin, NE 2 of 5Accura Healthcare of Knoxville, LLCKnoxville, IA 2 of 5Accura Healthcare of Lake City, LLCLake City, IA 2 of 5Accura Healthcare of MuscatineMuscatine, IA 2 of 5Accura Healthcare of OnawaOnawa, IA 2 of 5Accura Healthcare of Spirit LakeSpirit Lake, IA 2 of 5Sterling Park Health Care CenterWaite Park, MN 2 of 5Woodlyn Heights Healthcare CenterInver Grove Heights, MN 3 of 5Accura Healthcare of Ames, LLCAmes, IA 3 of 5Accura Healthcare of Aurelia, LLCAurelia, IA 3 of 5Accura Healthcare of Cherokee, LLCCherokee, IA 3 of 5Accura Healthcare of FullertonFullerton, NE 3 of 5Accura Healthcare of Pomeroy, LLCPomeroy, IA 3 of 5Accura Healthcare of StantonStanton, IA 3 of 5Accura Healthcare of ToledoToledo, IA 3 of 5Meadow ManorGrand Meadow, MN 3 of 5Prairie View Senior LivingTracy, MN 3 of 5Traditions Memory Care of NewtonNewton, IA 4 of 5Accura HealthCare of North PlatteNorth Platte, NE 4 of 5Accura Healthcare of Le MarsLe Mars, IA 4 of 5Accura Healthcare of MilfordMilford, IA 4 of 5Accura Healthcare of New HamptonNew Hampton, IA 4 of 5Accura Healthcare of Ogden, LLCOgden, IA 4 of 5Accura Healthcare of Sioux City, LLCSioux City, IA 4 of 5Faulkton Senior LivingFaulkton, SD 5 of 5Accura HealthCare of HartingtonHartington, NE 5 of 5Accura Healthcare of BancroftBancroft, IA 5 of 5Karlstad Healthcare Center INCKarlstad, MN

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ACCURA MIDWEST HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/01/2017
LENEAVE, THOMASIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER30%since 11/01/2017
CONNER, ROBERTIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2024
ELLIOTT, COREYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2023
TOTI, LISAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
LENEAVE, TEDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/01/2017
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$275K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 5%Other / private 39%

This home reported $275K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$295per resident / day
operating cost
$8,953per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$284per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165451. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next