Accura Healthcare of Pomeroy, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 23.7 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.39 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.96 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.60 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, and policy review, the facility failed to complete appropriate hand hygiene for 3 of 4 residents observed (Resident #16, #19 and #20). The facility further failed to apply a gown when completing catheter care on a resident (Resident #2) with Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The facility reported a census of 24 residents. Findings include:1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 that indicated no cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented Resident #2 utilized an indwelling catheter. The MDS documented Resident #2 had a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, stage 3A and 3B. Review of Resident #2's Care Plan documented a focus that Resident #2 was at risk for colonization with Multidrug-Resistant Organism (MDRO) related to catheter placement, goal was Resident #2 would remain free from MDRO through the review period and an intervention that Resident #2 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure resident's current code status was available for 1 out of 14 residents reviewed (Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 24 residents. Findings include: Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessment identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05, indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #10 MDS's documented diagnoses of hypertension, thyroid disorder, arthritis, Alzheimer's disease and non-Alzheimer's disease. The Clinical Census revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Baseline Resident Care Plan lacked documentation regarding Resident #10's code status. The Electronic Medical Record and the paper chart lacked documentation regarding Resident #10's code status. On [DATE] at 9:35 AM, Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) reported she would first look at the electronic medical record to locate resident advance directives/code status. She said the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Long Term Care (LTC) Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User Manual and staff interview the facility failed to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Significant Change in Condition Assessment (SCSA) for 2 of 14 residents reviewed (Resident #3 and #5). The facility reported a census of 24 residents. Findings include: 1. The MDS dated [DATE] documented Resident #5 had a BIMS of 1 that indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented no significant change assessment. Review of Care Plan with review history date of 1/26/26 documented Resident #5 required an assist of 1 staff with walker for transfers initiated on 3/3/25 and ambulation required an assist of 1 with a walker initiated on 3/3/25. Review of current Care Plan documented Resident #5 required an assist of 2 staff with mechanical sit to stand lift for transfers with revision on 5/3/26 and ambulation required an assist of 2 with a mechanical sit to stand initiated on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Residents #15) for insulin administration. The facility reported a census of 24 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #15 dated 4/1/26 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of diabetes mellitus and long term use of insulin. The MDS documented Resident #15 received insulin injections and hypoglycemic medications during the last 7 days. The Care Plan with a target date of 6/30/26 revealed Resident #15 was at risk for alteration in blood glucose levels related to diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The Care Plan directed to administer blood sugars per order, observe for side effects and effectiveness of medications. The Physician Order dated 6/22/25 directed staff to administer Novolog FlexPen (rapid-acting insulin) 100 units/ml (milliliter), inject 28 units subcutaneously…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview and Electronic Health Record (EHR) review the facility failed to provide treatment and services to residents that had decreased range of motion to prevent further decrease in range of motion to 2 of 4 residents (Resident #5 and #16). The Facility reported a census of 24 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #5 had a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 1 that indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #5's Care Plan with review history date of 1/26/26 documented Resident #5 required an assist of 1 staff with walker for transfers initiated on 3/3/25 and ambulation required an assist of 1 with a walker initiated on 3/3/25. The Care Plan documented an intervention of a walker and wheelchair for adaptive equipment with revision date of 6/8/25. Review of Resident #5's current Care Plan documented Resident #5 required an assist of 2 staff with mechanical sit to stand lift for transfers with revision…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide complete assessments and interventions for 1 of 5 residents reviewed. Staff reported that Resident #2 had on-going agitation that lead to hitting of staff, and regular bruising on his arms from various causes. The chart lacked documentation of these concerns until 7/5/25, when he reported allegations of rough treatment with dark bruising on his arms. The facility reported a census of 26 residents.Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 (moderate cognitive deficits) The resident did not have behavioral symptoms, directed toward others such as hitting, kicking and pushing, and no rejection of care. He had verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others 1-3 days during the look-back period. Resident #2 used a manual wheel chair and was able to wheel at least 150 feet and make 2 turns. He was frequently incontinent of urine and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for 2 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #1 and #3.) Within a 5-week timeframe staff reported 3 medication errors for Resident #1. Staff left medications for Resident #3 unattended, and the cup of pills was later discovered on the food tray in the kitchen. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #1 was absence of spoken words, she was rarely/never understood. She was unable to participate with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment and her cognitive skills were severely limited. Resident #1 was totally dependent on staff for toileting, dressing, hygiene, and transfers and used a wheel chair. He diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, aphasia, seizure disorder, malnutrition and Rett's Syndrome (neurological disorder that causes severe muscle movement) The Care Plan last updated on 4/8/25, showed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff were orientated and trained to care for residents. Temporary nurses and Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were expected to perform the job duties without proper training. The facility reported a census of 36 residents.Findings include: On 8/12/25 at 1:00 PM, the Administrator and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated they had orientation checklists for agency staff. In the absence of the Director of Nursing (DON) they would look for documentation that the following temporary staff had been oriented: Staff C, CNA, Staff E, CNA, and Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN). In an observation on 8/12/25 at 1:10 PM, Staff L, CNA was assisting residents with transfers too and from their rooms. Staff L said that she was with a staffing agency it was her second day at this facility. The last time she worked at this facility was 6 months previous. She said that she did not get an orientation, and she didn't remember any education…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-01 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for Quarter 1, 2025 review, facility staffing reports review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit accurate staff reports for the PBJ Staffing Data Report. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: The PBJ Staffing Data Report with a run date of 4/23/25, for the 1st quarter of the fiscal year 2025; (October 1 - December 31), triggered for a failure to have licensed nursing coverage 24 Hours/Day. Infraction dates included: 10/19, 10/20, 11/28, 12/2, 12/3, 12/4, 12/5, 12/6, 12/8, 12/9, 12/10, 12/11, 12/13, 12/16, 12/17, 12/18, 12/19, 12/20, 12/22, 12/23, 12/24, 12/25, 12/26, 12/27, 12/30 and 12/31. A review of the nursing schedules and timesheets revealed that nurses were on duty on the above dates. On 4/29/25 at 3:30 PM, the Administrator said that the PBJ report was being submitted by a third-party entity. She said that the process had been unorganized and confusing and the facility had identified and arranged for a different company to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician and family regarding a skin condition after a fall (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented diagnosis of schizophrenia, depression, and orthostatic hypotension. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of facility Progress Notes on 4/30/25 at 10:25 a.m. revealed a nurse documented on 4/28/25 at 7:05 p.m. a fall follow up and revealed a skin condition, a bruise, was found on the back of Resident #1's right leg behind the knee, the bruise measured 2 centimeters (cm) x 4 cm, the bruise was described as yellow, green, purple in color. The Progress Note lacked information that the family and physician was notified. Review of facility skin sheets on 4/30/25 at 10:25 a.m. revealed the facility failed to fill out the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ACCURA HEALTHCARE — 41 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $153K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA