Sterling Park Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 35.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.19 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.22 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.37 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow process to ensure advanced directives were accurately documented and updated on the resident's electronic health record (EHR) banner, physician orders and Physician's Orders for Life Saving Treatment (POLST) which affected 2 of 16 residents (R35 and R19) reviewed for advance directives. These findings constituted an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation for R35 and R19 who would not have received cardiopulmonary resuscitation measures (CPR) according to their wishes. The IJ began on [DATE], when R35's POLST, indicating R35's wishes for resuscitation was signed by the medical provider and it was not changed within the facility's EHR to reflect R35's wishes. This error was not identified despite multiple opportunities; and a series of interviews with direct care staff outlined they would implement the incorrect directions and not perform CPR which was against R35's wishes due to this error. The director of nursing (DON) was notified of the IJ on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-01 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) was on-site for at least 8 consecutive hours on a daily basis. Lack of consistent RN coverage may result in delayed assessment, clinical decision-making, or care interventions, potentially jeopardizing resident health and safety. This failure had the potential to negatively impact resident care and oversight.Findings include: Facility payroll based journal (PBJ) staffing data report for fiscal year 2025, quarter 2 (January 1- March 31) triggered excessively low weekend staffing. Facility assessment dated [DATE]- indicated facility need for 1 RN for 40 residents. Facility staffing schedules indicated RNs were scheduled for 12-hour shifts (6am-6:30pm, and 6pm-6:30am). Review of facility staffing data submitted for PBJ report, for weekends 1/1/25-3/31/25, revealed no RN coverage for Sunday 2/23/25.During interview on 7/30/25 at 2:39 p.m., director of operations (DOO) stated the facility had a contingency plan in place…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure parameter mattress (a type of mattress cover, or encasement designed to create a gentle barrier around the edge of the bed, preventing falls) was not used in a manner to restrain resident while in bed for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed for restraints.Findings include: R21's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R21 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R21's diagnoses included unspecified dementia with anxiety, atrial fibrillation, anemia, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, hyperlipidemia, arthritis, non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, and chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of left lower extremity. MDS did not indicate R21 utilized restraints. R21's care plan reviewed 7/31/25, identified R21 had limited physical mobility with fall risk related to weakness and limited mobility and had no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document review, the facility failed to ensure that a safe and orderly discharge was arranged for 1 of 2 residents (R40) who was discharged against medical advice (AMA). The facility did not complete a comprehensive discharge plan, or adequate documentation of efforts to educate the resident about the risks of leaving AMA. Findings Include: R40's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R40 had intact cognition and required minimal or limited assistance with activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R40's diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus (DM) with other specified complication, major depressive disorder, hypertension, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee, postprocedural; hypothyroidism, and hyperlipidemia. R40's quarterly care conference dated 6/10/25 noted resident plan to discharge to assisted living (AL) facility once medical assistance (MA) was open. R40 would need outpatient therapy, assistance with medication management, and a commode with bars that goes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for 1 of 2 residents (R25) reviewed for care planning.Findings include: R25's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R25 had intact cognition and required moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R25's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, diabetes mellitus, hyperkalemia, depression, respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea, and mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology. R35's care plan included: (Preferred Name) has an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit r/t (related to). dated 5/16/25 and lacked goals and interventions. (Preferred Name) has (SPECIFY: Diabetes Mellitus, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia) dated 5/16/25 and lacked goals and interventions. (Preferred Name) has altered cardiovascular status R/T (SPECIFYCARDIAC DX) (SPECIFY: With / without potential for bleeding/bruising…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and implement interventions to ensure proper wheelchair positioning and prevent potential complications for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed for wheelchair usage. Further, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician's order for 1 of 1 resident (R25) reviewed for assessment prior to medication administration. Findings include: R21 R21's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R21 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R21's diagnoses included unspecified dementia with anxiety, atrial fibrillation, anemia, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, hyperlipidemia, arthritis, non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, and chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of left lower extremity. R21's care plan identified R21 had a self-care deficit and required assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess a resident for safe electric recliner usage for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed for accidents.Findings include: R21's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R21 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R21's diagnoses included unspecified dementia with anxiety, atrial fibrillation, anemia, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, hyperlipidemia, arthritis, non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, and chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of left lower extremity. R21's care plan, print date of 7/31/25, indicated staff were to encourage R21 to elevate legs in recliner. R21's care plan reviewed 7/31/25, identified R21 had limited physical mobility with fall risk related to weakness and limited mobility and had no recent history of falls. Care plan indicated R21 was non-ambulatory and needed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection prevention and control practices during meal service for 3 of 3 dining observations. Specifically, staff failed to intervene when a resident (R25) was observed touching the tops of other residents' coffee cups during meal service, creating a risk for cross-contamination and transmission of communicable diseases.Findings include: During observation on 7/28/25 at 11:38 a.m., during a lunch observation in the main dining room, R25 was observed walking around the dining room and stopping at multiple tables. R25 was observed touching the tops/rims of coffee cups, that were placed on the seat of his walker, when handing them out to other residents. Staff present in the dining area did not redirect or intervene to prevent R25 from touching the drinkware of other residents. During observation on 7/30/25 at 11:39 a.m., during a lunch observation in the main dining room, R25 was observed walking around the dining room and stopping at multiple tables to pick up coffee cups. R25 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to promptly notify a physician of a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed when a right lower leg abscess worsened and required hospitalization. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified intact cognition without behaviors. He had a functional impairment of the upper extremities located on one side, used a walker, and a motorized wheelchair for mobility. He required substantial/maximal assistance for personal/toilet hygiene, dressing, bathing, partial/moderate assistance lying to sit, sit to stand, and all transfers. Ambulation was not attempted due to medical conditions or safety concerns. Medical diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (arteries became narrowed or blocked, reduced blood flow to extremities, most often feet and legs), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (stroke), hemiplegia/hemiparesis (significant weakness or paralysis in one half of the body), and at risk for pressure ulcers.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement treatment consistent to the resident's physician's orders and professional standards of practice, and revise interventions as appropriate for 1 of 3 residents (R1) when R1 was not sent sustenance with to his appointment. Findings include: R1's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and R1 had diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure, pneumonia, and adult failure to thrive. Further, MDS identified R1 required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene and lower body dressing and R1 required supervision assistance with ambulation. R1's February 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated R1 had an order for Osmolite (formula high in calories and protein to help patients gain and/or maintain healthy weight) 1.5 or equivalent formula, administer by Gtube (gastrostomy tube) with gravity flow four times a day related to malignant neoplasm of tongue. This…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Base on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to store and label food properly, dispose of undated and expired food items, to reduce the risk of food borne illness. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 34 residents who were provided meals from the kitchen. Findings include: During initial tour of kitchen on 4/29/24, at 11:33 a.m., with dietary manager (DM) the following was observed: - in the room with the serving window, on the back wall was a three door free standing cooler. Behind the first door was two plastic serving cups of jello uncovered/undated, three plastic serving cups of fruit cocktail uncovered/undated. Behind the third door a meal that had been saved had no label of when it was placed in the cooler. - in the room with the serving window, next to the three door cooler stacked on the floor were three racks of hamburger and hotdog buns. DM stated these were outdated and needed to be returned to the bread company. There was no signage indicating to staff to not use the bread products and return to the bread company. - in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-04 for 3 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ACCURA HEALTHCARE — 41 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $214K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN