Prairie View Senior Living

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 42.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to facility failed to maintain surveillance of staff illness for preventing, monitoring and investigating illnesses to control infections for 1 of 1 infection control program. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents. The facility also failed to appropriately clean, rinse, and air-dry nebulizer apparatuses (mask, cup) after medication administration for 3 of 3 residents (R9, R14 and R21) and ensure 3 of 3 observed stand lifts, located in the 200 and 300 wing were appropriately cleaned between resident use. Findings include: SURVIELLANCE Review of the 2024-2025 Norovirus Information for Long-term Care Facilities, located at, https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/foodborne/outbreak/facility/ltcfnorotoolkit.pdf, identified Norovirus is transmitted through a fecal (stool)-oral route with symptoms of diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, abdominal pain, low grade fever, headache, and or body aches. Individuals generally become ill 12-48 hours after exposure (swallowing Norovirus). Infected individuals shed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident's (R36) room was maintained in a homelike manner and ensure preventative maintenance was provided to repair numerous chips and scratches in the pain on 2 of 4 walls.Findings include: R36's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), accepted on 9/5/25, identified R36 was re-admitted to the facility in November 2023, with diagnoses of heart failure, high blood pressure, and arthritis. R36 had intact cognition and had no behaviors noted. Observation on 5/18/25 at 10:25 a.m., of R36 ion her room identified R36 was seated in her chair. R36 was alert and oriented and stated she had been at the facility for a while. R36 had numerous chips on the walls directly behind her chair and on the right side of the bed, approximately 10 to 12 inches on the wall, above the mattress. When asked about the chips and scuffs in the paint, R36 stated they had always been there since she moved in. Interview on 5/20/26 at 1:00 p.m., with the administrator identified the maintenance director (M-D) was out at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to have documented communication between the facility and hospice per their written agreement and ensure hospice notes were included in the medical record for 1 of 1 sampled hospice resident (R5). Findings include: R5's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, accepted on 9/24/25 identified R5 was re-admitted to the facility in September 2024, with diagnoses of dementia, anxiety disorder and had moderately impaired cognition. R5's current, undated care plan identified R5 has a terminal prognosis requiring hospice involvement/palliative care related to his end stage disease process. Comfort, dignity and autonomy was to be maintained at the highest level and was to demonstrate peacefulness and calmness through body language and/or verbalization. Review of R5's electronic medical record (EMR) hospice notes identified R5's R5 had hospice notes, schedules, and care plans captured in the EMR for the following months:February 2025, 9 times.March 2025, 6 times.April 2025, 5 times.May 2025, 1 time.June 2025 through August…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolated
  Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 8 sampled staff (director of nursing (DON) and nursing assistant (NA)-C) had initial or annual Alzheimer's and dementia training. Findings include: Review of the facility Employee Roster, Job and hire date document identified nursing assistant (NA)-C's had a hire date of 2/23/26. Review of her Alzheimer's Disease or Related Disorder Training identified she had not completed training for an explanation of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders, assistance with activities of daily living, problem solving with challenging behaviors, or communication skills. Review of the facility Employee Roster, Job and hire date document identified director of nursing (DON) had a hire date of 5/28/24. Review of her Alzheimer's Disease or Related Disorder Training identified she had not completed training for an explanation of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders, assistance with activities of daily living, problem solving with challenging behaviors, or communication skills. Interview on 5/19/26 at 4:25 p.m., with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify physician of skin alteration for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for change of condition. Findings include R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had intact cognition. R1 had infection to the foot and was receiving application of nonsurgical dressing with ointment/medication to her feet.R1's progress note dated 6/4/25 at 1:30 p.m., indicated R1 was admitted via electric scooter from local hospital with many bruises on arms and an open area left great toe. R1's progress notes dated 6/5/25 at 4:08 a.m., indicated admission skin assessment completed and there were multiple bruises noted on bilateral arms and legs and dressing remained intact to left great toe.R1's record reviewed between 6/5/25 through 6/11/25 revealed although the progress notes identified R1 had developed skin changes to her right foot that included discoloration, a large bump, and a large fluid filled blister, it was not evident the physician was notified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement thier facility assessment to ensure 1 of 1 licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A and potentially 8 other licensed nurses (registered nurses (RN's) and LPN's) who administered insulin had yearly competencies for safe administration of insulin, and identifcation of complications of low or high blood sugar levels and any actions needed. This had the potential to affect all residents who were diabetic. Finding include: R15's 1/21/25, Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified R15 cognition was intact, he had no pain, no behaviors, was on a therapeutic diet, received insulin, anticoagulant, diuretic, hypoglycemic medication daily and was on isolation. R15's diagnosis list identified he had diabetes mellitus type 2, long term use of insulin, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, edema, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. R15's January 2025, Medication Administration Record identified R15 received insulin Glargine Solution 48…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to have evidence of a Performance Improvement Project (PIP) which focused on high risk or problem-prone areas identified thorough and appropriate data collection and analysis and evaluation of the identified concern(s) during QAPI. This had the potential to affect all 43 residents. Review of the facilities QAPI minutes from June of 2024 through March of 2025 identified the following: 1. June 2024 minutes identified the facility chose a PIP of pain. The minutes did not include any data collection, analysis, evaluation of the identified concern, or an action plan. 2. July, August, September, October, November, December of 2024 and January, February, March of 2025 QAPI minutes identified the facility chose a PIP of pain but lacked any data collection, analysis or evaluation of the identified concern or an action plan. Interview on 4/15/25 at 4:30 p.m., with the administrator identified the QAPI committee had chosen pain from the facilities CMS Quality measures as their PIP project back in June. He reported they had not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the Ombudsman of transfers and discharge for 2 of 5 residents (R29 and R39) reviewed for hospitalizations and/or discharges. Findings include: R29's 3/16/25, discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified an unplanned discharge to general hospital. 3/19/25 an entry tracking record was completed. R39's 2/3/25, discharge return not anticipated MDS identified he returned to home/community. Review of the February and March 2025 Monthly Notice to Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care of Emergency Acute Care Transfer and Discharges form identified that neither R29 nor R39 were on the list of resident who had been discharged . Interview on 4/16/25 at 9:20 a.m., with social service designee (SSD) identified she notified the ombudsman monthly of any hospital discharges. She did not notify the ombudsman of any other types of discharges. She reported that the nurse took care of ombudsman notification if a resident discharged to home or anther facility. She confirmed that R29's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident status was accurately identified in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 of 12 sampled residents (R13 and R14). Findings include: R13 was admitted [DATE]. R13's undated, current diagnosis list identified R13 received a diagnosis of bipolar disorder 11/05/24. R13's 3/03/25, Level II PASARR had indicated R13 had meet criteria for severe mental illness. R13's 3/28/25, Significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) identified R13 was moderately, cognitively impaired and had a diagnoses of anxiety, bipolar disease and dementia. R13 had little interest or pleasure in doing things, never to 1 day and felt down, depressed or hopeless 2 to 6 days. R13 was dependent with ADLS and required substantial maximal assist with transfers. R13 had taken antipsychotics, antianxiety and antidepressant on a routine basis. Section A 1500 PASARR: resident been evaluated by [NAME] II PASARR and determined to have a serious mental illness and/or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R15) rapid acting insulin injection was administered according to the manufactures instructions. Finding include: R15's 1/21/25, Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified R15 cognition was intact, he had no pain, no behaviors, was on a therapeutic diet, received insulin, anticoagulant, diuretic, hypoglycemic medication daily and was on isolation. R15's diagnosis list identified he had diabetes mellitus type 2, long term use of insulin, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, edema, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. R15's January 2025, Medication Administration Record identified R15 received insulin Glargine Solution 48 units every morning and evening and Fiasp insulin aspart injection solution 32 units three times a day at 8:00 a.m., noon, and 5:00 p.m R15's medication administration audit report identified documentation on 1/26/25 at: 1) 9:17 a.m., Fiasp insulin 32 units had been administered. 2) 9:18…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ACCURA HEALTHCARE — 41 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $232K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN