Cascades at Desert View
820 Sprague Avenue, Buhl, ID 83316 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 57 certified beds · (208) 543-6401 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.6% | 15.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.4% | 5.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.2% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 7.5% | 2.0% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 25.7% | 15.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.3% | 16.1% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.5% | 16.3% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.8% | 3.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.1% | 22.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 45.9% | 20.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 8.1% | 1.8% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 76.9% | 86.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.6% | 17.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.6% | 12.3% | 12.0% | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 80.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 80.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 85.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 75.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 36.1 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-05-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' rights were protected to be free from neglect. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#191 and #192) reviewed for neglect. This failure caused physical harm to Resident #191 when she suffered a cut to her lower left leg and to Resident #192 when her thighbone was fractured. Findings include: The facility's Abuse policy, undated, documented Residents are to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. The facility's Abuse policy also documented neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. 1. Resident #191 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower back that may cause pain or numbness in the legs). A progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Grievances, Resident Council Meeting minutes, resident's interview, review of records, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure grievances were responded to and investigated. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#5 and #25) reviewed for grievances. This failure created the potential for psychosocial harm if residents' grievances were not acted upon. Findings include:The facility's Grievances policy dated 10/2024, documented the Administrator was the Grievance Officer. The Grievance Officer, with the assistance of social services, had the responsibility to oversee the grievance process, receive and track grievances through to their conclusion, lead any necessary investigation, maintain confidentiality, issue written grievance decisions and coordinate with state or federal officials as necessary. The facility also documented the Grievance Officer and/or Designee will make such reports available within five business days and a summary report of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient RN services at least eight consecutive hours per day, every 24 hours, seven days a week, as required. This failure had the potential to affect all residents in the facility who may require higher level of nursing assessment and intervention. Findings include: The facility policy titled Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, revised August 2022, documented, a registered nurse provides services at least eight consecutive hours every 24 hours, seven days a week. Review of the facility's three-week nursing schedule dated 4/19/26 through 5/10/26, documented the facility did not provide 8 consecutive hours of registered professional nursing coverage on: 5/9/26. On 5/14/26 at 11:47 AM, the HR Director stated there was no RN coverage for 24 hours on 5/9/26.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, FDA 2022 Food Code, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident meals were palatable and maintained their correct temperature. This directly impacted all residents who dined in the facility. This failed practice had the potential to negatively affect residents' nutritional status and psychosocial well-being. Findings include:The FDA food Code Section 3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding documented bacterial growth and/or toxin production can occur if time/temperature control for safety food remains in the temperature Danger Zone of 5 degrees C to 57 degrees C (41 degrees F to 135 degrees F) too long. Operations requiring heating or cooling of food should be performed as rapidly as possible to avoid the possibility of bacterial growth. Based on these data and conclusions from the risk assessment, FDA continues to recommend that food establishments limit the cold storage of time/temperature control for safety foods, ready to-eat foods to a maximum temperature of 41 F. On 5/11/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, policy review, and review of the FDA 2022 Food Code, the facility failed to appropriately wear beard nets, clean kitchen surfaces, dishes and skillets, store, distribute, and label foods. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received meals prepared in the facility's kitchen. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination and use of spoiled foods, and adverse health outcomes including food-borne illnesses. Findings include:a. The FDA Food Code Section 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, TCS (time/temperature control for safety) food, date marking, states marking the date or day the original container is opened in a food establishment, with a procedure to discard the food on or before the last date or day by which the food must be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded.The facility's Food Receiving and Storage policy dated 3/31/25, documented all food stored in the refrigerator or freezer are covered, labeled and dated ( use by date). Refrigerated foods are labeled, dated and monitored so they are used by their use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, CDC Legionnella guidelines, OSHA Legionella guidelines, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adherence to infection control and prevention practices to provide a safe and sanitary environment when, 1. staff had not used barrier protection, 2. perform hand hygiene, 3. had not tested swamp cooler water. Findings include:1. CDC Controlling Legionella in other devices dated 1/3/25 obtained from https://www.cdc.gov/control-legionella/php/toolkit/other-devices-module.html documented the following. - Any system or equipment containing nonsterile water can grow Legionella. - Sediment and biofilm, temperature, water age, and disinfectant residual are the key factors that affect Legionella growth. - In the absence of control, Legionella can grow in almost any system or equipment containing nonsterile water at favorable temperatures. Tap water is an example of nonsterile water. - Equipment that may grow Legionella in the absence of control include the following: - Evaporative air coolers Regularly clean and maintain all water system…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-15 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews, the facility failed to employ a certified Activities Director. This failure had the potential to affect residents' quality of life when design of activities appropriate for residents was not implemented. Findings include:On 5/11/26 at 10:45 AM, the Administrator stated the facility's Activity Director had quit and the Activities Assistant was filling the position for now.On 5/13/26 at 2:10 PM, the acting Activities Director stated she was only in this position for a few weeks to see if she wanted to take the position. She stated she did not have the certification or license and was not in a training program to be licensed.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for 7 of 14 residents (#2, #4, #8, #10, #18, #23, and #38) reviewed for physician orders and bowel and bladder care, This failed practice created the potential for residents to experience discomfort when medications were not administered according to the physician's order. Findings include:a. The facility's Bowel Management - Clinical Protocol policy dated 4/2026, documented the facility shall assess, monitor, and manage bowel and bladder function for all residents according to individualized needs, physician/provider orders, and applicable regulations. Intervention Protocol documented as follows:- No bowel movement for 2 days: Senokot 8.6 mg PO BID/PRN; increase fluids, offer prunes or juice, and/or BAP from dietary, reduce for diarrhea.- No bowel movement for 3 days: give Mirlalax 17 gm PO BID/PRN (adminster in fluid of choice) plus day 2 bowel regime,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-15 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was accurate and posted daily for each shift. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility and their representatives, visitors, and others who wanted to review the facility's staffing levels. Findings include:On 5/13/26 at 9:55 AM, during review of the daily staffing sheets from October 2025 through April 2026, the surveyor noted the actual hours worked had not been documented.The following documents those daily staffing sheets that were not completed correctly or were missing. - 2026- April 25, No RN scheduled or hours- [DATE], No evening nursing staff scheduled- [DATE], No RNs all three shifts, no nurses scheduled for evening shift- [DATE], No nurses scheduled for Day shift- [DATE], RN staffing for only 2 hours that day- [DATE], No RN's scheduled- [DATE], No RN's scheduled- [DATE], Missing the daily staffing sheet- [DATE], No RN's scheduled- [DATE], No…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect. This was true for 2 of 14 Residents (#8 and #23) reviewed for respect and dignity issues. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of embarrassment and diminished sense of worth. Findings include: The facility's Dignity policy dated 2/2021, documented staff promote, maintain and protect resident privacy.demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents: for example, helping the resident to keep urinary catheter bag covered. 1. Resident #8 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including gastroparesis (the stomach cannot empty itself of food in a normal fashion) and diabetes. On 5/11/26 at 2:16 PM, Resident #8's catheter bag was observed hanging on the trash can in his room and had not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were informed in advance of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications and alternative treatment options. This was true for 1 of 5 Residents ( Resident #43) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice created the potential for residents of receiving psychotropic medications without knowledge of the impact the medications could have on their physical and mental health. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication policy, dated 7/22, documented residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition, and in part 3, Residents, families, and/or the representative are involved in the medication management process. Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease and depression. A physician's order documented Resident #43 was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents' drinking water was within their reach. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #28) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to experience urinary tract infection, confusion and other health conditions if they were not able to maintain their hydration. Findings include:Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including quadriplegia (partial or total loss of motor and sensory function in all four limbs) and diabetes.Resident #28 was observed in bed on the following days 5/11/26 at 2:50 PM, 5/12/26 at 3:59 PM, and 5/13/26 at 9:55 AM, lying in bed and watching the television. Drinking water was observed on top of his bedside table located on his right side by the head of his bed. Resident #28 was observed moving his left hand. There was no movement noted on Resident #28's arms. The drinking water was not within Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC CMS-10123) within the CMS required timeframe to 1 of 3 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. This deficient practice had the potential to cause financial harm or distress for residents when they were not informed of their potential liability for payment when their Medicare Part A benefits ended. Findings include:The facility's Medicare Advance Beneficiary and Medicare Non-Coverage Notices policy dated 9/22, documented if the resident's Medicare covered Part A stay or when all of Part B therapies are ending, a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (CMS form 10123) is issued to the resident at least two calendar days before benefits end.Resident #19 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a critical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and policy review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were monitored for the adverse effects of their psychotropic and opioid medications. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents experienced side effects of the medication and were undetected due to lack of appropriate monitoring. Findings include: The facility's Pain Assessment and Management policy, dated 7/2022, Implementing Pain Management Strategies section 4, stated, when opioids are used for pain management, the resident is monitored for medication effectiveness, adverse effects, and potential overdose.The facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy, dated 7/2022, Policy Interpretation and Implementation, section 13, stated, Residents receiving psychotropic medications are monitored for adverse consequences including: a. anticholinergics effects, flushing, blurred vision, dry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to 1) ensure residents who were discharged home were provided with the necessary discharge information to ensure a smooth and safe transition of care. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #3) whose record was reviewed for planned discharge and 2) provide hospital transfer documents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #5) whose records were reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practice created the potential for residents to experience harm if they were not treated in a timely manner due to lack of information. Findings include: The facility's Transfer or Discharge policy date 10/2022, under Orientation for Transfer or Discharge (planned) documented, A post-discharge plan is developed for each resident prior to his or her transfer or discharge. This plan will be reviewed with the resident, and/or his or her family, at least twenty-four (24) hours before the resident's discharge or transfer from the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident with positive PASARR Level 1 screening for mental illness was referred for further evaluation to the appropriate state-designated authority. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #5) whose PASARR I was reviewed. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents required but did not receive specialized services for mental health while residing in the facility. Findings include:The facility's Resident Assessments PASRR Screening Coordination policy dated 4/2025, documented the facility would refer to the appropriate state-designated authority any resident with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability or related condition.Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hypotension.A PASRR Level 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of resident's admission. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure created the potential for harm when the care plan failed to provide direction for care. Findings include:The facility's Care Plans - Baseline policy dated March 2024, documented a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission.Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including unstageable pressure ulcer and severe sepsis (a life-threatening medical emergency occurring when an infection causes an overwhelming immune response, resulting in dysfunction or damage to one or more vital organs).Resident #44's baseline care plan was initiated on 9/16/25, and was not completed or signed until 9/22/25, six days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure comprehensive resident-centered care plans included the use of splint and RNA program of a resident. This was true for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #5) whose care plans were reviewed. This deficient practice created the potential for residents to receive inadequate or inappropriate care due to missing information in their care plan. Findings include:The facility's Care Plans Comprehensive Person-Centered policy revised 3/2022, documented the care plan Describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including quadriplegia (partial or total loss of motor and sensory function in all four limbs), schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hypotension.Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' comprehensive care plans were revised timely and as needed. This was true for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #5) whose care plans were reviewed. This deficient practice created the potential for residents to receive inappropriate care due to inaccurate information in their care plans. Finding include:The facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy revised March 2022, documented assessments of residents were ongoing and care plans were revised as information about the residents and the residents' condition changeResident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including quadriplegia (partial or total loss of motor and sensory function in all four limbs), schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hypotension.A care plan initiated 12/2/25, documented Resident #5 used assistive devices halo bars…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Advair website, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication was administered according to professional standards of practice. This was true for 2 of 5 residents (#18 and #31) observed during medication administration. This created the potential for residents to develop yeast infection when they did not rinse their mouth with water after taking their inhaler medication. Findings include:The Advair website accessed on 5/19/26, documented after inhalation the patient should rinse his/her mouth with water without swallowing to help reduce the risk of oropharyngeal candidiasis (a fungal infection caused by an overgrowth of Candida [yeast]).1.Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including asthma and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the blood).A physician' order dated 2/23/26, documented Resident #31 was to receive Advair HFA Aerosol 115-21 mcg/act (Fluticasone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion (ROM). This was true for 3 of 3 residents (#5, #27 and #28) reviewed for treatment and services related to ROM. This failed practice placed residents at risk of harm when they did not receive their restorative program as care planned to prevent further deterioration of their existing ROM limitations. Findings include:The facility's Restorative Nursing Services policy revised 2024, documented that residents would receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote safety and independence. 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including quadriplegia (partial or total loss of motor and sensory function in all four limbs), schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hypotension. On 5/11/26 at 10:52 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory services as ordered by the physician. This was true for 2 of 5 residents (#10 and #18) whose records were reviewed for respiratory services. This failure created the potential for residents to experience increased fatigue and low oxygen levels. Findings include:1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including multiple rib fractures and kidney failure.On 5/11/26 at 1:55 PM, observed Resident #10 lying in his bed awake, getting oxygen via nasal cannula at 4 LPM.On 5/11/26 at 3:02 PM, Resident #10's physician oxygen order documented oxygen at 2 L/min via nasal cannula while sleeping.Resident #10's care plan documented he has oxygen therapy r/t nocturnal hypoxia. Oxygen use as needed and ordered, check Room air saturations as ordered, wean as able/ordered On 5/13/26 at 3:42 PM, the CRN stated Resident #10's oxygen should have been set at 2 LPM and was not. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' identifiable information was not accessible to the public. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #16) whose care plan was found to be in the Resident Council Meeting minutes. This deficient practice created the potential for residents to experience psychosocial harm due to loss of dignity and emotional distress. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Protected Health Information Uses and Disclosures of, dated 2001, policy stated, Protected health information will not be used or disclosed except as permitted by law. On 5/12/26 at 4:10 PM, the Resident Council Meeting minutes were reviewed. The Resident Council Meeting minutes included Resident #16's partial care plan with the focus on behavior goals and interventions, and a nursing department note with medical information about his feet, medication, and treatment refusals.On 5/12/26 at 4:18 PM, the Administer stated the Resident Council Meeting minutes binder was available to the public when they asked for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's sanitation policy, the facility failed to ensure: A) dishwasher temperatures were maintained to ensure proper sanitation of dishware, B) fire sprinklers and alarms were maintained in clean and sanitary condition, and C) food was stored in an unsanitary manner. These failures created the potential for cross-contamination and adverse health outcomes, including foodborne illness. Findings include:The facility's sanitation policy, revised May 2024, documented that all kitchen and dining areas must be kept clean, free from garbage and debris, and protected from rodents and insects. It also documented that the low-temperature dishwasher must maintain a wash cycle temperature of 120 F, rinse with 50 parts per million hypochlorite on dish surfaces, and that chemical concentrations must be tested on ce per shift.1. On 10/24/25 at 7:10 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) was observed washing kitchen utensils and placing them in storage. During the second cycle, the dishwasher reached only 100 F during the wash cycle.A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure their pest control program was effective in the kitchen. This failure impacted the 33 residents residing in the facility who ate food prepared in the facility's kitchen. The cockroach infestation created the potential for harm. Finding include:On 10/23/25 at 10:12 PM the kitchen of the facility was observed, the kitchen door was not locked, when the door was opened, a cockroach was observed scurrying from under the dishwashing area toward the ice machine. There was a strong chemical odor in the kitchen. Parts of the kitchen were draped in thin plastic sheathing, and the floor was noted to be damp in areas. A cockroach was observed on its back flailing it's legs in the walkway between the food service tray line and the coffee preparation area. Brown, coffee ground like droppings were observed behind kitchen equipment on a countertop. Live cockroaches were observed crawling on the floor, in kitchen cabinets and drawers, on packaged food products, and under the oven. Dead…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to a) ensure resident care plans were revised to reflect current needs and interventions and b) ensure residents and their representatives were encouraged to participate in care planning and attend care conferences. This was true for 4 of 16 residents (Resident #8, #11, #21, and #27) whose care plans were reviewed. This placed residents at risk for adverse outcomes if care and services were not provided due to care plans not being revised as resident's needs changed. Findings include. The facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, revised March 2022, documented assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the resident and resident condition changes. 1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including surgical aftercare, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, and dementia. Resident #8's care plan revised 3/13/25, documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 12 hours of in-service education per year for 2 of 2 CNAs (#2 and #3) reviewed for sufficient and competent CNA staffing. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from staff who are not adequately trained to meet residents' needs. Findings include: 1. On 4/3/25 at 12:46 PM, review of CNA #2's employee file documented her hire date was 3/22/19. Review of CNA #2's Employee In-service Hours form documented she had 9.5-hours of in-service time for 2024. Review of CNA #2's Employee In-service Hours form documented she had completed two in-services for 2025. No time was documented for the two in-services. CNA #2's employee file did not document that she had completed 12-hours of in-services for the 2024/2025 evaluation period. 2. On 4/3/25 at 1:50 PM, review of CNA #3's employee file documented her hire date was 1/13/10. Review of CNA #3's Employee In-service Hours form documented she had 4 hours of in-service time documented for 2024. CNA #3's Employee In-service Hours form documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained prior to initiation of psychotropic medications for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of receiving medications without knowledge of the reason why medications were prescribed, the expected benefits, and the risks associated with the medications. Findings include: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including surgical aftercare, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, and dementia. On 12/31/24, a physician order documented Resident #8 was to start Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes) 25 mg one time a day for dementia with behavioral disturbance. On 1/29/25, the Pharmacist documented It would be suggested to assess the risks versus benefits for continued use of Quetiapine (generic Seroquel) 25 mg at bedtime…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a clean, safe, homelike environment. This was true for all residents who resided in the facility whose environment were observed. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if: a) residents were embarrassed by and/or felt the disrepair in the facility was unacceptable, disrespectful, or undignified and b) residents were injured due to unsafe areas in the facility. Findings include: The facility Maintenance policy revised December 2009, documented the function of the maintenance personnel was to maintain the building in good repair and free from hazards. On 3/31/25 at 11:20 AM, observed a thick layer of dust and dirt on the ceiling air exchange vent in the North hallway. On 3/31/25 at 1:58 PM, observed the floor by the copy room with a 7-inch by ¾- inch area missing tiles. On 4/1/25 at 1:54 PM, observed the floor in the main dining room, in front of the counter with condiments a 2-inch by 1/3-inch piece of flooring sticking up. On 4/1/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected resident's status. This was true for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #6) whose MDS assessments were reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential for negative outcomes if residents were not assessed and/or monitored due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include: Resident #6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including heart failure and diabetes. Resident #6's Physician order dated 5/29/24, documented Level of Care: Hospice. Resident #6's care plan dated 8/29/24, documented Resident #6 had a terminal prognosis and was on hospice. Resident #6's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], documented under section O, K1. Hospice No. Resident #6's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], documented under section O, K1. Hospice No. On 4/2/25 at 9:54 AM, the DON stated Resident #6 was on hospice and she did not know why his MDS did not reflect that.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to refer residents with an exempted hospital stay and have a diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for a re-evaluation and determination. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #8), reviewed for PASRR level II evaluations. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if resident's specialized services for mental health needs were not evaluated by an appropriate state-designated authority. Findings include. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including surgical aftercare, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, and Major Depressive Disorder. On 11/25/24, a BLTC Medicaid reviewer documented on Resident #8's PASRR Level II 30-day exemption rehabilitation. If the participant stays (30 days) past admission, please submit most current MDS, MD orders, social notes, and psych info to BLTC. If discharged , please notify BLTC. Review of Resident #8's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of nursing practice were followed for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for quality of care. Resident #28 was at risk for adverse outcomes when her physician order was not written correctly. This failed practice had the potential to adversely affect residents whose care and services were not followed according to accepted standards of practice. Findings include: Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease (when the arteries become narrow or blocked, reducing blood flow to the affected areas) and left leg, above the knee amputation. On 3/31/25 at 10:41 AM, observed Resident #28's right lower extremity with a Tubigrip stocking (a tubular elastic bandage used to provide tissue support and compression). Her left lower leg had been amputated. Resident #28's Physician order dated 11/19/24, documented, Tubigrip to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were put in place and followed to prevent additional falls for 2 of 16 residents (#1 and #6) reviewed for falls. This failure increased the potential for additional falls and potential injury for residents with a history of falls. Findings include: 1. Resident #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including cerebral infarction (when blood flow to the brain is blocked, causing tissue death to the brain) and traumatic brain injury. Review of the facility's Incident and Accident reports dated 6/22/24, documented the staff were transferring Resident #1 to the bed when his knees buckled, and he was lowered to the ground. Review of the facility's Incident and Accident reports dated 2/10/25, documented NA #1 was transferring Resident #1 to the bed, when his legs buckled, and she lowered him to the ground. Review of Resident #1's care plan did not document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were tracked and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who received controlled medication in the facility. Findings include: On 4/1/25 at 1:55 PM, during North hall medication cart audit, observed the narcotic accountability record, dated 3/2/25 to 4/1/25, with one licensed nurse signature not documented. On 4/1/25 at 1:57 PM, LPN #1 stated the nurses should have signed the narcotic accountability sheet when they accepted the medication cart or released the medication cart.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the attending physician acted upon Pharmacy recommendations for 1 of 16 residents, (Resident #8) whose medication regimens were reviewed for psychotropic medication. This deficient practice placed residents with dementia at an increased risk of death. Findings include: The facility's Medication Regimen Review Policy dated April 2024, documented the attending physician is to document in the medical record any medication irregularity and what, (if any) action was taken to address it. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including surgical aftercare, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, and dementia. On 12/31/24, a physician order documented Resident #8 was to start Seroquel (a medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes) 25 mg one time a day for dementia with behavioral disturbances. On 1/29/25, the Pharmacist documented on the MRR report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the FDA Black Box Warning, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical necessity for psychotropic medication administration. This was true for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure created an increased risk of mortality when residents diagnosed with dementia were prescribed antipsychotic medications. Findings include: The FDA documented elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Seroquel (an antipsychotic drug) is not approved for elderly patients with dementia related psychosis. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including surgical aftercare, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, and dementia. On 12/31/24, a physician order documented Resident #8 was to start Seroquel 25 mg one time a day for dementia with behavioral disturbance. On 2/28/25, the Pharmacist documented on the MRR report to the attending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. This was true for 2 medications (5.41% error rate) which affected 1 of 3 residents (Resident #142) whose medication administrations were observed. This failed practice placed residents at risk of not receiving their prescribed medication or dosage of their medication. Findings include: The following was observed during the medication pass: Resident #142's physician order documented insulin sliding scale; administer Lantus insulin, 10 Units subcutaneously and Lispro insulin, 2 Units subcutaneously. On 4/2/25 at 7:35 AM, observed LPN #1 remove Lantus insulin pen from the medication cart and dial the Lantus insulin pen to 1 Unit to prime and then dialed to 10 Units as ordered. On 4/2/25 at 7:36 AM, observed LPN #1 remove Lispro insulin pen from the medication cart and dial the Lispro insulin pen to 1 Unit to prime then dialed to 2 Units as ordered. LPN #1 did not prime the insulin pens with the required 2 Units of insulin before dialing the ordered dose.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were stored and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who received controlled medication in the facility. Findings include: On 4/1/25 at 1:37 PM, observed bottle of lorazepam liquid (Schedule IV controlled medication) stored in the medication refrigerator door rack. On 4/1/25 at 1:48 PM, RN #1 stated the medication refrigerator and the medication room door is locked. She stated there is no other locked, permanently affixed, compartment inside the medication refrigerator for controlled medications.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and review of the Idaho Food Code, it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was stored properly, dated when opened, equipment was stored in a sanitary condition, and ensure infection control protocol was followed during meal tray delivery. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 39 residents who received meals prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: The Idaho Food Code, revised February 2021, stated, 3-501.17 Ready-to-eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking . held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded . The NSF Machine Operational Requirements for the dishwasher documented: Wash temperature recommended 120 degrees Fahrenheit, minimum 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Rinse temperature recommended 140 degrees Fahrenheit, minimum 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Required 50 PPM Available Chlorine. 1. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control and prevention practices were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment when staff did not perform proper hand hygiene. These failures had the potential to impact all residents in the facility by placing them at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include: The following was observed for hand hygiene: On 3/31/25 at 11:55 AM, observed 12 residents served their meal in the dining room. Hand hygiene was not offered or performed for the residents prior to receiving their meal. On 3/31/25 at 12: 06 PM, observed RN #1 serve 3 residents their meal to them in their room. Hand hygiene was not offered or performed for the residents. On 3/31/25 at 12:36 PM, CNA #1 stated they usually wash the resident's hands with wash clothes before and after they eat but today, they did not, and they should have. On 4/3/25 at 12:11 PM, IP stated the residents should be offered hand hygiene before meals, in the dining room and in their rooms.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment and environment was maintained, and food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner. These deficiencies had the potential to affect the 39 residents residing in the facility who consumed food prepared by the facility. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination of food and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illnesses. Findings include: 1. The FDA Food Code Section 3-305.11(A) documented food should be protected from contamination and stored in a clean, dry location where it was not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination; and at least 6 inches above the floor. On 5/30/24 at 3:45 PM, during an inspection of the dry food pantry, the following was observed: - The bottom shelves were measured at 4.25 inches. Individual bags of potato chips, tortilla chips, paper goods, single use cups, and plastic silverware were stored on the bottom shelves. - A layer of dust was observed on one of the upper shelves where a television was placed above an active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents and their representatives received assistance to exercise their right to formulate an advanced directive. This was true for 3 of 12 residents (Resident #6, #36, and #38) whose records were reviewed for advanced directives. This deficient practice created the potential for harm or adverse outcomes if residents' wishes were not followed or documented regarding their advance care planning. Findings include: The facility's Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advanced Directives policy, revised September 2022, documented on admission the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advanced directive, and if not, determine whether the resident would like to formulate an advanced directive. Should the resident have an advanced directive, copies will be made and placed on the chart as well as communicated to the staff. Any decision-making regarding resident's choices will be documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a bed hold notice was provided to residents or their representatives upon transfer to the hospital. This was true for 2 of 6 residents (#6 and #30) reviewed for transfer. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents were not informed of their right to return to their former bed/room at the facility within a specified time. Findings include: The facility's Transfer or Discharge policy, dated October 2022, documented the Notice of Facility Bed-Hold and Return policies are provided to the resident and representative within 24 hours of emergency transfer. The following resident records did not include documentation the resident or their representative was provided a Notice of Facility Bed-Hold: a. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a chemical imbalance in the blood that damages the brain) and hypertension. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control and prevention practices were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment. These failures had the potential to impact 1 of 1 resident (Resident #38) reviewed for catheter care, by placing him at risk for cross-contamination and infection. Findings include: The facility Catheter Care, Urinary policy, revised February 2024, directed staff to be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a chronic disease of the central nervous system) and adult failure to thrive (general decline in health in older adults). On 5/28/24 at 11:38 AM, Resident #38 was observed lying in his bed and his foley catheter (a semi-flexible plastic tube inserted into the bladder and the other end is attached to a bag that collects urine--used when a person cannot urinate normally)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure pertinent health information was provided to the receiving hospital. This was true for 2 of 6 residents (#6 and #30) reviewed for transfers. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse outcomes if residents were not treated in a timely manner due to a lack of information provided upon transfer. Findings include: The facility's Transfer or Discharge policy, dated October 2022, documented should a resident be transferred or discharged for any reason: A. The following information is communicated to the receiving facility or provider: -The basis for the transfer or discharge -Contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident -Resident representative information including contact information -Advanced directive information -All special instructions or precautions for ongoing care, as appropriate -Comprehensive care plan goals -All other information necessary to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate assessments for assistive devices were completed for 2 of 2 residents (#1 and #38). This deficiency created the potential for injury if the residents were not assessed and monitored appropriately. Findings include: The HALO Safety Ring Instructions, undated, included a warning, ENTRAPMENT MAY OCCUR. Proper patient assessment and monitoring, and proper maintenance and use of equipment is required to reduce the risk of entrapment. (A HALO Safety Ring is a bed mobility device that increases environmental independence, prevents mattress movement, and is considered a type of bed rail.) 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including a traumatic brain injury, spastic hemiplegia of his nondominant side (a condition that causes muscle tightness and involuntary contractions in the limbs and extremities on one side of the body), muscle weakness, and a history of falls. On 5/28/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a residents', PASARR Level I (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) had correct information and if residents' PASARR Level I indicated the resident had been identified with possible indicators of mental illness and required further screening, a PASARR Level II was to be completed. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#6 and #30) whose PASARR records were reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if residents' specialized services for mental health needs were not provided due to lack of screening. Findings include: The facility's Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring policy, revised February 2024, documented if the PASARR Level I screen indicates that the individual may meet the criteria for a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or related condition, he or she will be referred to the state PASARR representative for the Level II (evaluation and determination)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was changed as indicated. This was true for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for respirator care. This created the potential for respiratory infections due to growth of pathogens (organisms that cause illness) in respiratory treatment equipment. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should) and kidney disease. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 5/9/24, documented Resident #7 had severe cognitive impairment and received oxygen therapy. A physician's order, dated 4/1/24, directed staff to change Resident #7's oxygen tubing and humidifier and clean concentrator filter, twice a month, on the 1st and the 15th, during the night shift. On 5/28/24 at 12:42 PM, Resident #7 's concentrator humidifier (container of water attached…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure informed consent was given by the resident or their representative for the use of bed rails. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#1 and #38) reviewed for having bed rails. This failure created the potential for harm when the resident did not understand the risks associated with the use of bed rails. Findings include: The facility was unable to provide the policy and procedure for the use of assistive devices and the requirement of obtaining informed consent prior to the use of assisted devices. The facility stated they followed the manufacturer's HALO Safety Ring Instructions for installation. 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including a traumatic brain injury and spastic hemiplegia of his nondominant side (a condition that causes muscle tightness and involuntary contractions in the limbs and extremities on one side of the body), muscle weakness, and a history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the pneumococcal vaccine. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #20) whose records were reviewed for pneumococcal vaccinations. This failure created the potential for residents to have an increased risk of pneumococcal (bacterial) pneumonia and the potential for severe illness or death. Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, dated 9/22/23, and accessed on 6/4/24, included recommendations for pneumococcal vaccinations for all adults 65 years or older as follows: - If you never received any pneumococcal vaccine, the CDC recommends receiving one dose of PCV20 or PCV15. - If you have previously received PCV13 at any age and PPSV23 at less than [AGE] years of age, the CDC recommends receiving PCV20 at least five years after administration of PCV13 or PPSV23. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including paranoid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to regularly inspect bed rails to identify areas of possible entrapment. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#1 and #38) who were reviewed for the use of bed rails. This failure created the potential for injury or harm if a resident was to become trapped by unmonitored equipment. Findings include: The HALO Safety Ring Instructions, undated, included, Regularly check the HALO device to identify areas of possible entrapment, immediately cease using the bed until entrapment risk is fixed. 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including a traumatic brain injury and spastic hemiplegia of his nondominant side (a condition that causes muscle tightness and involuntary contractions in the limbs and extremities on one side of the body), muscle weakness, and a history of falls. On 5/28/24 at 1:00 PM, Resident #1 was observed with an assistive device called a HALO safety ring attached to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of grievance logs, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure all call lights were functioning. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#7 and #30) reviewed for call lights. This had the potential for harm if residents were unable to summon staff assistance by activating the call light. Findings include: The facility's Call System, Resident policy, dated September 2022, documented residents are provided with a means to call staff for assistance through a communication system that directly calls a staff member or a centralized workstation. 1. Resident #7 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should) and kidney disease. Resident #7's care plan, revised 2/3/24, directed staff to provide a safe environment: call light in reach and answer call light promptly. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 5/9/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CASCADES HEALTHCARE — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASCADES AT DESERT VIEW LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2023 |
| DESERT VIEW HOLDINGS OF BUHL, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2023 |
| TAKAYAMA FLP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 23% | since 01/01/2023 |
| TOWER BRIDGE FLP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 23% | since 01/01/2023 |
| MOORE, THOMAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 10% | since 01/01/2023 |
| CRUMP, JASON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| FULLMER, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| MCSPADDEN, DARIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| WHITE, DEREK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| QUEST FLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| RONNMARK FLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| BENTZLER, LORI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/25/2025 |
| MARSHALL, SAMANTHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/25/2025 |
| EELIR FLP | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| KIREI KAZOKU, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| NADROJ LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| OXFORD ASSETS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| PIPPIN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in ID
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Idaho Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 135089. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.