No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sunny Ridge

2609 Sunnybrook Drive, Nampa, ID 83686 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 43 certified beds · (208) 467-7298 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (208) 467-7298 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (80%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
203 12th Ave Rd · (208) 466-3338 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2219 12th Ave Rd · (208) 318-0536 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Albertsons<0.1 mi
2400 12th Ave Rd · (208) 465-6597 · Call to confirm hours
Park
East Greenhurst Road · (208) 465-2310 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.6%15.6%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.8%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.2%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.6%2.0%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.2%15.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.9%16.1%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.3%16.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.1%96.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%3.2%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.5%22.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.0%20.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.0%1.8%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.6%86.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission11.0%17.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.4%12.3%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.1%CMS range 42.8–65.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.9–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 2.9–13.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.571.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.93
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.67
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
80.0%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 35.7 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 80% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-23)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and functioning devices to prevent resident's fall. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #143) reviewed for accidents and falls. Resident #143 was harmed when he was being transported to the restorative dining room, and sustained a laceration on his head when he fell. Findings include: Resident #143 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, heart disease, osteoarthritis, cognitive decline, and depression. An MDS significant change assessment, dated 4/16/24, documented Resident #143 was cognitively intact. Resident #143's care plan, initiated 10/12/22, documented Resident #143 was at risk for falls due to impaired mobility, Parkinson's disease, weakness, unsteady gait, medications, and poor safety awareness. Interventions included foot device to wheelchair for positioning, revised 3/21/24. This intervention was not followed. An I&A report,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications available for residents were not expired and kept in a temperature-controlled environment; this was true for 2 of 2 medication carts and 1 storage room observed. This failure created the potential for residents to receive medications with decreased efficacy. Findings include:The facility's Medication Labeling and Storage policy revised 2/2023, documented: If the facility has discontinued, outdated or deteriorated medications or biologicals, the dispensing pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding returning or destroying these items.1. On 1/22/26 at 8:00 AM, the East Hall medication cart was inspected with LPN #1 present. The following medications were observed:One tube of Glucose Gel 15 mg, expired 4/25One bottle of Aspirin 81 mg, expired 10/25One bottle of Fexofenadine HCI 60 mg, expired 11/25One bottle of TUMS, expired 12/25One bottle of Vitamin D 1,000 (10mcg), expired 12/25One bottle of Aspirin 325 mg, expired 12/25One bottle of Gen-dryl (diphenhydramine)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, the SOM Appendix PP, review of the FDA Food Code, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment required for food safety, as well as cleaning and sanitizing dishes used by facility residents. This was true for 31 of 32 residents who received food prepared by the facilities kitchen. These deficient practices created the potential for harm by placing residents at risk for potential foodborne illnesses and adverse health outcomes. Findings include:1. The FDA Food Code Section 2-402.11 Effectiveness documented, food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food; clean equipment, utensils, and linens.On 1/20/26 at 8:15 AM, during an initial observation of the facility kitchen Dietary Aide #1 was observed walking through the kitchen without wearing a hair net.On 1/20/26 at 8:18 AM, Dietary Aide #1 stated he should have been wearing a hair net…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to help in developing an advance directive for health care decisions. This was true for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for advance directives. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents' instructions for their healthcare were not followed in the event of a life-threatening outcome. Findings include:Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including right side paralysis following a heart attack, Parkinson's Disease, cognitive communication deficit, depression, and anxiety. A Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #18 was cognitively intact.A record review of Resident #18's Progress Notes did not document he was offered the opportunity to create an advanced directive.Resident #18's IDT Care Conferences dated 4/17/25, 5/15/25, 7/28/25, 9/17/25, and 12/16/25 did not document that Resident #18 was offered information to formulate an adavanced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected resident's status. This was true for 2 of 13 residents (#3 and #6) whose MDS assessments were reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential for negative outcomes if the resident was not assessed and/or monitored due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include:1. Resident #3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] after a short hospital stay with multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia - bipolar type and anxiety.Resident #3's Significant Change MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented under A1500 in Section A, no for the question, Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition? However, there was a PASRR level II documented in her electronic medical record, dated 9/14/25.On 1/21/26 at 3:24 PM, the MDS Coordinator #2 stated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive resident centered care plan included the care and services for their toenails. This was true for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #32) whose comprehensive care plan was reviewed. This deficient practice created the potential for Resident #32 to receive inadequate or inappropriate care. Findings include: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including stroke with hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness on one side on the body).A Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #32 was dependent on staff for her activities of daily living.Resident #32's ADLs care plan, revised 12/15/25 did not include care for her toenails.On 1/21/26 at 9:44 AM, Resident #32's toenails were observed with the ADON. The ADON was asked to describe Resident #32's toenails. The ADON stated it looked like Resident #32 might have fungal infection on her toenails, brittle, thick and of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living assistance received services for their toenails. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #32) reviewed for nail care. This placed Resident #32 at risk of embarrassment which could affect her socially due to the appearance of her toenails. Findings include: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including stroke with hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness on one side on the body).A Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #32 was dependent on staff for her activities of daily living. On 1/20/26 at 3:34 PM with CNA #1 present, Resident #32's toenails were observed to be thick and whitish to yellowish in color.On 1/21/26 at 9:44 AM, Resident #32's toenails were observed with the ADON. The ADON was asked to describe Resident #32's toenails. The ADON stated it looked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #49) reviewed for standards of practice. Resident #49's psychotropic medication was not clarified for its indication of use. These practices had the potential to adversely affect or harm residents whose care and services were not delivered to accepted standards of clinical practice. Findings include:Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including diabetes, protein calorie malnutrition, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).A Hospital Progress Note dated 12/12/25, documented Resident #49 underwent a procedure for gastrostomy tube (a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach, used to provide nutrition) placement.A Hospital Discharge Summary Note dated 12/19/25, documented Concerned lack of sleep and depression as cause as [Resident #49] has increased stress and sleep difficulties…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were adequately assessed for their dietary needs and provided their nutritional needs as ordered by the physician. This was true for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for weight loss. Resident #32 had the potential for harm when she experienced a 5% weight loss in 30 days. Findings include: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including stroke with hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness on one side on the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hepatitis C and alcohol abuse.A physician's order dated 12/31/25, documented Resident #32 was to be served with regular diet: mechanical soft texture, regular consistency, no plain eggs, bacon or milk products, extra gravy, sauces, yogurt to breakfast tray, ice cream to lunch or dinner tray.A Dietary Profile dated 10/2/25, documented Resident #32's preferred orange juice for her beverage. The dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, CDC guidance, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections when the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and don gloves during medication administration, and Resident #49's graduated cylinder and syringe were not changed as ordered by the physician. These failures increased the risk of infection and its associated complications. Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) web page titled, Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers, updated 2/27/24 accessed on 1/27/26, documented hand hygiene should be performed: Immediately before touching a patient. Before performing an aseptic task such as placing an indwelling device or handling invasive medical devices. Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient. After…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, CDC guidance, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 vaccinations were administered to the residents. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #32) whose COVID-19 vaccination was reviewed. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of severe illness, hospitalization, and death due to SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus - the virus that causes the COVID-19 illness) and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: The CDC website article titled: Staying Up to Date with COVID-19 Vaccines dated 11/19/25 and accessed on 1/26/26 documented:Protection from COVID-19 vaccine decreases over time.Immunity after COVID-19 infection decreases with time.The 2025-2026 vaccine is especially important if you: a. Never received a COVID-19 vaccine, b. Are ages 65 years and older c. Are at high risk for severe COVID-19 d. Are living in a long-term care facility.Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that physician-ordered medications were administered as prescribed for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for medication administration. This failure resulted in missed doses of essential medications and created the potential for adverse outcomes, including ineffective treatment and exacerbation of medical conditions. Findings include:1. Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorder, depression, and migraine disorder.A review of Resident #1's medication administration record (MAR), dated 8/4/25 - 8/22/25, documented the following physician orders had not been administered and coded (9) (code 9 meaning see progress note): Cyanocobalamin solution (Vitamin B12) inject 1 milliliter (mL) intramuscular one time a day for increased immune function for 4 days into shoulder, thigh, or buttocks started 8/5/25, documented code 9 for 3 of 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, residents and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain or enhance residents' dignity during dining when residents seated at the same table were served their meals at different times. This was true for 2 of 14 residents (#94 and #96) observed in the main dining room and 1 of 7 (Resident #30) observed in the assisted dining room. This failure had the potential to cause a decrease in residents' sense of self-worth and psycho-social well-being. Findings include: 1. On 1/6/25, the following were observed in the Main Dining Room: a. Resident #7, Resident #9, and Resident #96 were seated at the same table. Resident #7 and Resident #9 were served their meal tray at 8:10 AM and 8:13 AM respectively and started eating. Resident #96 did not receive her tray until 8:29 AM (19 minutes from when the first meal was delivered to their table). b. Resident #93, Resident #94 and Resident #95 were seated at the same table. Resident #93 and Resident #95 were observed eating their meals at 8:21 AM. Resident #94 did not receive her meal tray. - at 8:50 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the Incidents and Accidents (I&As) report, residents and residents' representatives interview, staff interviews, and residents' group interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient numbers of staff available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs. This was true for 3 of 41 residents (#19, #30, and #36) reviewed for staffing concerns and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. This deficient practice created the potential for physical and psychosocial harm if residents did not receive appropriate care or received delay of care. Findings include: a. Residents and their representatives were interviewed and stated the facility did not have sufficient staff to meet their needs. - On 1/6/25 at 11:16 AM, Resident #144's representative stated, Staff is good and care for residents, but during meal times there are not enough staff to respond to immediate needs and he is waiting for help if he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policies and procedure, review of Incidents and Accidents (I&As), and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This was true for 3 of 3 residents (#4, #16, and #145) reviewed for medication administration. This failure created the potential for harm if the resident's medications were not administered according to the physician's order. Findings include: The facility's Administering Medications policy, revised 2/24, documented: -The Director of Nursing Services supervises and directs all personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions. -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. The facility's Medication and Treatment Orders policy, revised 7/16, documented: -Drug and biological orders must be recorded on the Physician's Order Sheet in the resident's chart. 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, Food Code review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment and environment was maintained, clean, and food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner. These deficiencies had the potential to affect the 41 residents who consumed food prepared by the facility. This placed residents at risk for potential food contamination and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illnesses. Findings include: 1. Food Receiving and Storage: The FDA Food Code Section 3-302.12 Food Storage Containers, Identified with Common Name of Food documented, Except for containers holding food that can be readily and unmistakably recognized such as dry pasta, working containers holding food or food ingredients that are removed from their original packages for use in the food establishment, such as cooking oils, flour, herbs, potato flakes, salt, spices, and sugar shall be identified with the common name of the food. The FDA Food Code Section 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, TCS (time/temperature control for safety) food, date marking,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained prior to initiation of medications for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #144) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of receiving medications without knowledge of the reason why medication was prescribed, the expected benefits, and the risks associated with the medications. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy, dated July 2022, documented residents (and/or representatives) have the right to decline treatment with psychotropic medications. The staff and physician will review with the resident/representative the risks related to not taking the medication as well as appropriate alternatives. Resident #144 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting the right side, and bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes extreme mood swings). A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure transfer notices were provided to the ombudsman. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for transfers to the hospital. This deficient practice had the potential for harm if residents were not aware of or able to exercise their rights related to transfers. Findings include: The State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, revised on 8/8/24 documented, Before transfers or discharges of a resident, the facility must notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. The facility must send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including end stage renal disease, diabetes, and congestive heart failure (a chronic progressive condition affecting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a bed hold notice was provided to the residents or their representatives upon transfer to the hospital. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#6 and #40) reviewed for transfer. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents were not informed of their rights to return to their former bed/room at the facility within a specified time. Findings include: The facility's Transfer or Discharge policy, dated 10/2022, documented a notice of facility Bed-Hold and Return policies are provided to the resident and representative within 24 hours of emergency transfer. 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including acute cholecystitis (inflammation of the gallbladder) and diabetes. A nursing progress note, dated 9/23/24 at 8:09 PM, documented Resident #40 complained of on and off abdominal pain for the past three days. Resident #40's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) had correct assessment information. This was true for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #16) whose records were reviewed for accuracy. This deficient practice had the potential for negative outcomes if residents were not assessed and/or monitored due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), revised 10/1/24, documents if a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level II determines a resident has a serious mental illness then section A1500 of the MDS should be marked yes. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia, PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder), and major depressive disorder. Resident #16's medical record documented a PASSAR level II, dated 1/11/22 and 6/17/22, was completed. Resident #16's admission MDS assessment, section A1500, dated 1/18/22, documented Yes, Resident #16 did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' medications were administered according to professional standards. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #17) observed during medication administration. This failed practice created the potential for Resident #17 to experience low or high blood sugar if she receives an incorrect amount of insulin. Findings include: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including diabetes and stroke. A physician's order, dated 9/16/24 documented Resident #17 was to receive 12 units of Insulin Aspart subcutaneously (under the skin) one time a day related to diabetes. On 1/8/25 at 11:51 AM, LPN #1 took the Insulin Aspart pen, replaced the needle with a new one and dialed the pen to 12 units. LPN #1 then went to Resident #17's room and injected the Insulin Aspart to Resident #17's lower abdomen. LPN #1 was not observed to prime the insulin pen before dialing the prescribed dose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure pharmacist recommendations were followed or addressed by the attending physician. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #31) whose pharmacist recommendation was reviewed. This deficient practice created the potential for Resident #31 to use unnecessary medications. Findings include: The facility's Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) policy, reviewed 4/2024, documented the Consultant Pharmacist performs MRR for every resident in the facility receiving medication upon admission (or as close to admission as possible) and at least monthly thereafter, or more frequently if indicated. Within 24 hours of the MRR, the Consultant Pharmacist provides a written report to the attending physicians for each resident identified as having a non-life threatening medication irregularity. The report contains: Resident's Name, Name of Medication, The Identified Irregularity and The pharmacist recommendation. The attending physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #144) observed for infection control. This failure created had the potential to impact all residents in the facility by placing them at risk of infection. Findings include: The CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) website, updated 7/12/22 and accessed on 1/14/24 stated, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. EBP may be indicated (when Contact Precautions do not otherwise apply) for residents with any of the following: wounds or indwelling medical devices regardless of MDRO (Multiple Drug Resistant Organism) colonization status. Resident #144 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure influenza vaccine was administered to a resident who consented to receive the vaccine. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #39) reviewed for immunizations. This deficient practice created the potential for harm should Resident #39 acquire, transmit, or experience complications from influenza. The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) policy, revised 2018, documented an IPCP was established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The policy stated immunization was a form of primary prevention and widespread of use of influenza vaccine in the nursing facility was strongly encouraged. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including hypertension and osteoporosis (a condition that causes bones to gradually thin and weaken). Resident #39's Immunizations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were monitored appropriately and offered non-pharmacological interventions while receiving opioid pain medications. This was true for 4 of 8 residents (# 3, #14, #17, and # 32) reviewed for pain management. This failure created the potential for residents to experience adverse reactions due to lack of appropriate monitoring or increased pain due to not offering non-pharmacological interventions. Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain, dated 2022, last reviewed 6/14/23, accessed online 2/27/24, documented clinicians should maximize use of non-pharmacological and non-opioid pharmacological therapies as appropriate for the specific condition and patient and only consider initiating opioid therapy if expected benefits for pain and function are anticipated to outweigh risk to the patient. The facility's Pain - Clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control and prevention practices were maintained when hand hygiene was not performed for 2 of 2 residents (#10 and #14) observed for infection control. This failure created the potential for cross-contamination and infection. Findings include: 1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including age related cognitive decline and malnutrition. Resident #10's record included an order to cleanse her coccyx (tailbone) wound with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply skin prep to surrounding healthy tissue, then apply hydrocolloid dressing to site until resolved. On 2/20/24 at 2:05 PM, LPN #2 was observed providing wound care to Resident #10. LPN #2 remove the soiled dressing and provided incontinent care around the wound. She then proceeded to cleanse the wound without changing her soiled gloves. On 2/20/24 at 2:11 PM, LPN #2 stated she did not realize she had not changed her gloves after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure all pertinent information was provided to the receiving facility when a resident was transferred to another health care facility. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #15) reviewed for resident transfer. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse outcomes if residents' specific needs were not treated appropriately and in a timely manner due to lack of information provided upon transfer. Findings include: The facility's policy for Transfer or Discharge, dated October 2022, stated, Should a resident be transferred or discharged for any reason, the following information is communicated to the receiving facility: a. The basis for the transfer or discharge. b. Contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident. c. Resident representative information, including contact information. d. Advance Directive information. e. All special instructions or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive resident-centered care plans. This was true for 2 of 12 residents (#23 and #33) whose care plans were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk of negative outcomes if services were not provided or provided incorrectly due to lack of information in their care plan. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, revised March 2022, documented the care plan interventions are chosen after careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their cause, and relevant clinical decision making. The care plan will also include interventions addressing the underlying source of the problem not just the symptoms or triggers. 1. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit. Resident #33's care plan, revised 12/4/23, documented staff were to monitor and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on I&A review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' care plans were reviewed and revised. This was true for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #10) whose care plans were reviewed. This created the potential for harm when Resident #10's care plan was not reviewed and revised to reflect his care needs. Findings include: The facility's Care Plan policy, revised March 2022, documented the care plan will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including age related cognitive decline and malnutrition. Resident #10's care plan, revised on 3/29/23, documented Resident #10 was a fall risk and was in a room closer to the nurses station for increased supervision. A Nutritional Assessment, dated 3/6/23, documented Resident #10's dining ability was set-up with supervision. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, I&A review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for residents to prevent falls. This was true for 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #10), whose record was reviewed for falls. This resulted in harm to Resident #10 when he was left unsupervised to eat in his room. Findings include: The facility's Falls and Fall Risk policy, revised February 2022, documented, based on previous evaluation and current data, the licensed nurse would identify interventions related to the resident's specific risk and cause to try to prevent the resident from falling and or minimize complications. 1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including age-related cognitive decline and malnutrition. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/8/23, documented Resident #10 had impaired lower extremeties and required maximal assistance for transfers. Resident #10's care plan, revised 3/29/23, documented Resident #10 was a fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #32) whose medications were reviewed. This failure created the potential for harm to Resident #32 when she did not receive ordered medication. Findings include: The facility's Medication and Treatment Orders policy, undated, documented drugs that are required to be refilled must be reordered from the issuing pharmacy not less than 3 days prior to the last dose being administered to ensure that refills are readily available. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility 1/19/24, with multiple diagnoses including breast cancer, acute pain, and chronic pain. Resident #32 was prescribed ABHR cream (Ativan, Benadryl, Haldol, Reglan compounded into a topical cream), apply 1 millilliter to inner wrist 3 times a day for pain management. Resident #32's MAR, dated 2/1/24 through 2/21/24, documented on 2/20/24, evening shift, the medication was administered. On 2/21/24, day shift, her MAR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure two residents' (#27 and #23) food preference requests were honored. This failure put residents at risk if they experienced hunger or weight loss from not having meals provided according to their needs or preferences. Findings include: The Facility's Nutritional Assessment policy, revised October 2017, documented a comprehensive assessment for each resident included usual meal and snack patterns, food portion sizes, food restrictions, allergies, cultural, or religious practices that affected food choices and food preferences, food likes, dislikes, flavors, textures, and forms. The nutritional assessment was to also include documented current nutritional risk factors for or potential risk factors with a change in condition. 1. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes complications, and severe morbid obesity. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure food items were dated and labeled and hygiene practices followed. This failure had the potential to affect 32 of 32 residents residing in the facility who consumed food prepared by the facility, and placed them at risk of adverse outcomes including food-born illnesses. Findings include: 1. The facility's Preventing Foodborne Illness policy, Revised November 2022, documented Food and Nutrition service employees follow appropriate hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. Additionally, the policy stated contact between food and bare (ungloved) hands was prohibited, as well as hair nets or caps and beard restraints were to be worn when cooking, preparing, or assembling food to keep hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils, and linens. a. On 2/20/24 at 7:48 AM, Dietary Aide #2 was observed entering the kitchen during breakfast. She walked directly over to the bread with no observation of hand hygiene being performed. She was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure waste was properly contained with lids or otherwise covered. This was true for 1 of 2 outside dumpsters. This created the potential for insect and pest infestation of the facilities premises. Findings include: The facility's Sanitation policy, revised November 2022, documented garbage and refuse containers were to remain in good condition to prevent leaks, and waste was properly contained in the dumpster with lids or otherwise covered. On 2/20/24 at 11:45 AM, one dumpster was observed with the lid open, and bread rolls on the ground surrounding the dumpster. On 2/23/24 at 8:30 AM, the dumpster was observed with the lid open. On 2/23/24 at 8:33 AM, the Chef confirmed the dumpster was open and it should have been closed but it was hard to keep it closed since the nursing facility kitchen shared the dumpster with the Assisted Living facility.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADES HEALTHCARE — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 51.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
EELIR FLPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST23%since 10/18/2021
QUEST FLPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 10/18/2021
RONNMARK FLPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST23%since 10/18/2021
TAKAYAMA FLPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST23%since 10/18/2021
TOWER BRIDGE FLPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST23%since 10/18/2021
MCSPADDEN, DARINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/23/2021

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-16.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$858K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 19%Medicare 1%Other / private 80%

This home reported $858K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$163per resident / day
operating cost
$4,960per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$140per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Idaho Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Idaho
$10,494/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,175/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 135102. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next