Mt. Olympus Rehabilitation Center
2200 East 3300 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84109 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (801) 486-2096 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (66) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $149,703 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-24)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.8% | 11.3% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.4% | 3.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.7% | 1.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 16.8% | 16.5% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.6% | 15.1% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.9% | 25.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.6% | 3.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.0% | 21.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.0% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 0.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.2% | 91.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.9% | 16.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.4% | 11.6% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 83.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 7.4–18.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 83.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 75.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 75.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 35.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.15 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 59.7 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
66 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined for 1 out of 10 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident was dropped from a hoyer lift and died; the facility used a transfer sheet and not an approved Hoyer sling while transferring the resident. Resident identifier: 3. NOTICE:Notice of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was given verbally to the Administrator on [DATE] at 11:00 AM. The Administrator was asked to develop an immediate plan to ensure resident safety related to Hoyer lifts and Hoyer slings. PLAN:On [DATE] at 6:26 PM, the facility Administrator provided the following abatement plan for the removal of the IJ effective at [DATE] at 10:00 PM. IJ Abatement Plan [facility name redacted] F689 Free of accidents, hazards, and supervision & [and] F726 Competent Nursing StaffImmediate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. Specifically, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA)'s had not been educated on the correct way to use a Hoyer lift, approved Hoyer slings, and how to identify a transfer sheet. Additionally, a resident was dropped from the Hoyer lift while on a transfer sheet and died. Resident identifier: 3. NOTICE:Notice of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was given verbally to the Administrator on [DATE] at 11:00 AM. The Administrator was asked to develop an immediate plan to ensure resident safety related to Hoyer lifts and Hoyer slings. PLAN:On [DATE] at 6:26 PM, the facility Administrator provided the following abatement plan for the removal of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY HARM 9. Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to spina bifida, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, muscle weakness, bladder disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic pain, essential hypertension and a colostomy. On 2/6/23 at 12:31 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 47. Resident 47 stated he fell from his wheel chair onto his buttocks when he was transported to this doctor's appointment. Resident 47 stated he fell in the van right before his doctor's appointment. Resident 47 stated it happened because his seat belt was not secured properly. Resident 47 stated he had a new driver that day and they were aware on how to secure his wheelchair in the van and tighten his seat belt. Resident 47 stated that on his way to the appointment, he kept slipping out of his wheelchair every time the driver had to brake. Resident 47 stated when they made it to his doctor's appointment, he fell out of his wheelchair and had to have paramedics lift him back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2023-02-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies; and regularly review and analyze data, including data collected under the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) program, and act on available data to make improvements. Specifically, deficient practices identified during the survey included repeat deficiencies in the areas of prevention of accident hazards, physician notification in changes of condition, quality of care related to hospice services, resident's free from unnecessary medications, and maintaining laboratory reports in the resident records. Resident identifiers: 4, 11, 17, 18, 20, 31, 32, 47, 56, 68, 77, 134, 181, and 231. Findings included: 1. Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 9 out of 41 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Specifically, for 1 out of 41 sampled residents, a resident who attempted suicide in the facility was not receiving behavioral health services when there were multiple recommendations for behavioral health services prior to the incident. Resident identifier: 134. Findings included: Resident 134 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which include nontraumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage, chronic pulmonary edema, pneumonia unspecified organism, epilepsy, acute and chronic respiratory failure, dementia, other specified peripheral vascular diseases, adult failure to thrive, plantar fascial fibromatosis, muscle weakness, repeated falls, multiple fractures of ribs, right side,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that, for 3 out of 23 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to choose activities, schedules, health care and providers of health care services consistent with his or her interests, assessments, and plan of care and other applicable provisions of this part; and to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident. Specifically, three residents were restricted to supervised smoking and designated smoking times when they were assessed to have the functional capacity to smoke independently and one resident's request to be taken off of an antipsychotic medication was not completed as ordered. Resident identifiers: 6, 32, and 66. 1. Resident 66 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses included major depressive disorder recurrent severe without psychotic features, other specified diabetes mellitus without complications, and nicotine dependence.Resident 66's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 3 out of 23 sampled residents, that the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that were complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized. Specifically, a physician visit note was not documented in the medical record, a resident's medication administration record was not accurately completed, and a physician's note was entered late in the resident's medical record. Resident identifiers: 6, 10, and 41 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms; unspecified psychosis; delusional disorders; anxiety disorder; and post-traumatic stress disorder.Resident 6's medical record was reviewed 6/22/26 through 6/29/26.A Physician Progress Note dated 5/14/2026 at 8:20 AM was entered as a Late Entry and indicated, Patient was seen in person on 5/14. She requested discontinuation of olanzapine due to weight gain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-29 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain documentation related to staff COVID-19 vaccination that included that staff were provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccine; offered the COVID-19 vaccine or information on obtaining COVID-19 vaccine; and the COVID-19 vaccine status of staff and related information as indicated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Specifically, 4 staff members had no documentation that they were offered or provided Covid-19 immunizations. Staff identifiers: 1, 2, 3, and 4. On 6/29/26 at 9:00 AM, the employee records were reviewed for Staff 1, 2, 3, and 4. There was no documentation that indicated immunizations had been offered or administered to the staff members.On 6/29/26 at 2:54 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing who stated the COVID-19 immunization was offered to all staff during the flu season but it was not documented.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-29 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that, for 1 out of 23 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure each resident was informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she preferred. Specifically, one resident was on Olanzapine and there was no documentation that she was informed of the risks and benefits or treatment or treatment alternatives or options. Resident identifier: 6Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms; unspecified psychosis; delusional disorders; anxiety disorder; and post-traumatic stress disorder.Resident 6's medical record was reviewed 6/22/26 through 6/29/26.A physician's order dated 5/1/26 at 3:41 PM indicated, OLANZapine Oral Tablet 10 MG [milligrams] (Olanzapine) Give 1 tablet by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for 1 of 23 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, one resident was not tapered off of Olanzapine as ordered and requested by the resident. Resident identifier: 6.On 6/22/26 at 10:14 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 6 who stated she felt the Nurse Practitioner (NP) was not listening to her because it had been weeks since she asked to be taken off Olanzapine, but all that had happened was that the dose was lowered. Resident 6 stated she also spoke to the Medical Doctor because she was not taken off of the medication and still nothing changed. Resident 6 stated she talked to Registered Nurse (RN) 1 the night before last about changing her Olanzapine and three other medications, and nothing had happened yet. Resident 6 stated she even got a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for 1 of 23 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible. Specifically, a resident was found to have a nicotine vape in his possession despite being assessed as requiring supervision when smoking. Resident identifier: 3. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis of vertebra lumbar region, bacteremia, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere, type 1 diabetes mellitus without complications, and other psychoactive substance abuse with psychoactive substance-induced mood disorder. Resident 3's medical record was reviewed from 6/22/26 through 6/29/26.On 5/8/26, a Safe Smoking Evaluation - V 2 was completed for resident 3 upon his admission to the facility. The assessment stated that resident 3 smokes 1 pack of traditional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-29 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 23 sample residents were seen by a physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission, and at least once every 60 thereafter. Resident identifier: 4.Resident 4 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, osteomyelitis of vertebra, streptococcus group A, pressure ulcer of the sacral region and right buttock, myocardial infarction and chronic respiratory failure. Resident 4's medical record was reviewed on 6/29/26.Resident 4's progress notes were reviewed. The progress notes indicated that resident 4 had been seen by the facility physician on the following dates after the latest admission: 3/23/265/26/26Documentation for the physician visit from April 2026 was not observed in the medical record. On 6/29/26 at 2:20 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) who stated she was unsure how often the providers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for 1 of 23 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that each resident either received the pneumococcal immunization or did not receive the pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal. Specifically, one resident opted to receive the pneumococcal immunization but it was not provided. Resident identifier: 10. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease and severe dementia with psychotic disturbance.Resident 10's medical record was reviewed 6/22/26 through 6/29/26.An Immunization Consent dated 3/4/26 indicated resident 10 consented to, Pneumococcal Vaccine to be administered on 3/10/26.It should be noted that there was no documentation in the medical record that resident 10 received a Pneumococcal Vaccine.On 6/29/26 at 2:54 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) who stated resident 10 did not receive his immunizations.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 38 sampled residents, that the facility did not notify a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing. Specifically, when a resident was discharged to the hospital, the Ombudsman was not notified. Resident identifier: 21. Findings include: Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, left and right leg above knee amputation, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, and hypertension. Resident 21's medical record was reviewed on 5/6/24 through 5/9/24. The medical record revealed resident 21 was discharged to the hospital for a change in condition on 2/18/24. Resident 21 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Hospital Progress Note dated 2/18/24 at 10:07 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 4 of 38 sample residents were provided adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, residents had a wanderguard placed without a physician order or assessment. In addition, residents were able to elope from the facility multiple times without additional interventions put into place. Resident identifiers: 120, 121, 125, and 127. Findings include: 1. Resident 120 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury, memory deficit, schizophrenia, psychosis, Addison's disease, and diabetes mellitus. Resident 120's medical record was reviewed from 5/6/24 through 5/9/24. On 10/6/24, resident 120's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was an 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident 120's care plan was reviewed. A care plan dated 10/7/23 indicated that the resident was at risk for impaired safety related to Wandering. HE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 51 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, for 1 out of 38 sampled residents, a staff member was observed to touch a resident medications with bare hands with each medication administration. Also medications were dropped on and in the medication cart and then administered to the residents Findings include: On 5/8/24 at 8:20 AM, during morning medication pass the following was observed: a. At 8:32 AM Registered Nurse (RN) 2 was observed to not use hand hygiene prior to starting medication pass. RN 2 was observed to use her right index finger to retrieve a medication placed in the medication cup in error. After RN 2 had stuck her finger into the cup she was observed to then remove her finger and obtain a spoon to retrieve the medication from the cup. RN 2's finger was observed to have already touched the medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a baseline care plan for 2 of 38 sample residents that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care, and be developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission. Specifically, a care plan was initiated 7 days after admission for two residents. Resident identifiers: 55 and 167. Findings include: 1. Resident 55 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, dysphagia, difficulty walking, reduced mobility, repeated falls, dementia, visual hallucinations, major depressive disorder and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Resident 55's medical record was reviewed on 5/6/24. The care plans developed for resident 55 were reviewed. The 48 hour care plan was not developed until 2/15/24, this was 7 days after admission. 2. Resident 167 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that care plans for 2 of 38 sample residents were developed within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive assessment, or revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment. Resident identifiers: 121 and 127. Findings include: 1. Resident 121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury, vascular dementia, traumatic brain hemorrhage, cognitive communication deficit, and anxiety disorder. Resident 121's medical record was reviewed from 5/6/24 through 5/9/24. On 9/11/23, resident resident 121's BIMS on the admission MDS assessment was an 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated the the resident had wandered 1 to 3 days in the look back period. The MDS triggered behaviors on the Care Area Assessment Summary, however no wandering care plan was developed until 9/29/23. It should be noted that this was after the resident had eloped multiple times. Resident 121's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 38 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug was any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indication for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicated that the dose should be reduced or discontinued. Specifically, a resident's blood pressure (B/P) medication was administered outside of physicians ordered parameters. Resident identifier: 4. Findings include: Resident 4 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, severe protein calorie malnutrition, type II diabetes, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease stage 3, hypothyroidism, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and hypertension. Resident 4's medical record was reviewed on 5/6/24. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not label all drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and included appropriate accessory instructions and the expiration date when applicable. Specifically, narcotics were repackaged into the narcotic medication cards. Findings include: On 5/8/24 at 8:35 AM, an observation was made of the facility medication cart for the Quail hallway serving rooms 31 - 42. The following medication was located inside: a. A medication card which held Tramadol 50 mg (milligrams) had the back of pockets numbered 10 and 20 taped, there was a white tablet observed to be in each of the pockets. On 5/8/24 at 8:45 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 2. RN 2 stated that 2 nurses are supposed to waste narcotics, and they are usually placed in the sharps container then both nurses sign the narcotic book. RN 2 stated the narcotics are not supposed to be taped back into the narcotic card. On 5/9/24 at 9:17 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined, the facility did not provide a clean, comfortable homelike environment. Specifically, for 5 out of 41 sampled residents, resident rooms were dirty, a sit to stand lift was dirty, resident wheelchairs were dirty, and furniture was broken. Resident identifiers: 10, 15, 36, 54, and 72. Findings included: 1. On 2/6/23 at 10:04 AM, an observation was made of resident 36's room. Resident 36 had gashes behind the bed in the dry wall. Resident 36 stated the gashes had been in the wall since she had moved to the room. 2. On 2/6/23 at 10:14 AM, an observation was made of resident 54's room. Resident 54's room had laundry on the floor, a ripped gift bag on the floor, and a can of soda on the floor. Resident 54 stated sometimes her room was cleaned but she would like to have her room cleaned more often. 3. On 2/6/23 at 12:13 PM, an observation was made of a sit to stand lift in the hallway across from resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was dust and debris observed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 4 out of 41 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials. Specifically, an accident in which a resident sustained second degree burns when his oxygen ignited while smoking a cigarette unsupervised was not reported to the State Survey Agency (SSA) or Adult Protective Services (APS). Two allegations of resident abuse were not reported to the SSA or APS. Lastly, a Silver Alert was issued for a missing resident and this was not reported to the SSA or APS. Resident identifiers: 3, 17, 31, and 131. Findings included: 1. Resident 17 was admitted on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to schizoaffective disorder, Parkinson's disease, major depressive disorder, insomnia, cognitive communication deficit, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Resident 3's medical records were reviewed on 2/7/23 Resident 3's progress notes revealed the following: a. Nursing note dated 12/6/22 documented as followed: rec'd [received] call from 911 dispatch stating resident called saying that she had been strangled. upon entering room, res [resident] was noted to be laying on bed, talking on the phone w/ [with] 911 dispatch. res handed phone to this nurse, confirmed that emergency response not needed. asked resident what happened, res then responded stating 'I only have 1/4 of a brain', res redirected to statement to dispatch that 'someone strangled her'. res said she was and showed this nurse her neck saying 'look at the marks'. neck assessed w/no marks/discolorations/wounds to be found. told res no marks are visible. res…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-14 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments did not accurately reflect the resident's status. Specifically, for 5 out of 41 sampled residents, residents that had Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level II's completed did not have the PASRR indicated on the MDS assessments. Resident identifiers: 11, 10, 16, 20, and 36. Findings included: 1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, schizoeffective disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Resident 11's medical record was reviewed on 2/8/23. An admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that resident 11 did not have a PASRR level II. A PASRR screening dated 5/12/22, revealed that resident 11 required a PASRR level II to be completed. 2. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acquired absence of right leg above knee,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-14 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 3 out of 41 sampled residents, that the facility did not develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care to meet professional standards of quality care. Specifically, residents did not have a baseline care plan developed within 48 hours of admission, and the baseline care plan did not include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the residents. Resident identifiers: 32, 64, and 78. Findings included: 1. Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbances, fracture of right femur, orthopedic aftercare, history of falls, long term use of anticoagulants, anxiety disorder, type 1 diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, hyperglycemia, neuralgia and neuritis, muscle weakness, mood disorder, long term use of insulin, hypertension, nicotine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 9 of 41 sampled residents, that the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. Specifically, residents care plans did not address care areas such as pain, falls, smoking, and activities of daily living (ADL) assistance. Resident identifiers: 3, 4, 6, 17, 18, 24, 54, 78, and 134. Findings Included: 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to schizoaffective disorder, Parkinson's disease, major depressive disorder (MDD), insomnia, cognitive communication deficit, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DMII). Resident 3's medical records were reviewed on 2/7/23 An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident 3 required a one person limited assist while ambulating throughout the facility. Resident 3's balance and transitions while walking was identified as not steady, but able to stabilize without staff assistance. It was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 4 of 41 residents sampled, that the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug was any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indication for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicated that the dose should be reduced or discontinued. Specifically, residents' medications were not administered or held per the physician ordered parameters. Resident identifier: 11, 31, 32, and 47. Findings included: 1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, alcoholic cirrhosis, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, major depressive disorder, alcohol induced pancreatitis, paranoid schizophrenia, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorder, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-14 · tag F0775 — patternKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record laboratory (lab) reports that were dated and contained the name and address of the testing laboratory. Specifically, for 3 out of 41 sampled residents, a resident that had a UA completed did not have the sensitivity report at the facility or filed in their medical record. In addition, a resident that had a Troponin and Creatine Kinase (CK) ordered for chest pain did not have the report at the facility or filed in their medical record, and a resident that had an influenza nasal swab ordered did not have the report at the facility or filed in their medical record. Resident identifiers: 11, 20, and 68. Findings included: 1. Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, paraplegia incomplete, fracture of neck, spinal stenosis, extradural and subdural abscess, surgical aftercare, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, pressure ulcer of left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized. Specifically, for 3 out of 41 sampled residents, a resident with an arteriovenous (AV) fistula in his left arm had multiple blood pressure readings that were inaccurately documented as being taken with his left arm, a resident who was sent to the emergency room (ER) was missing documentation from the ER visit, and a resident that was sent to the hospital was missing hospital documentation and the tests and imaging from their medical record. Resident identifiers: 50, 64, and 78. Findings Included: 1. Resident 50 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease, encounter for palliative care, holiday relief care, chronic viral hepatitis C, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, memory deficit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 41 sampled residents, that the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA)was observed to pick up the oxygen tubing and nasal cannula from the floor and then offered it to the resident to place on their nose and face. Resident identifier 32. Findings included: Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), heart failure, hypertension, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, unsteadiness on feet, cognitive communication deficit, asthma, dorsalgia, pain in bilateral knees, and encounter for palliative care. On 2/06/23 at 12:46 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 32. CNA 7 picked resident 32's oxygen tubing up off the floor,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 2 out of 41 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident right to self-administer medications was determined by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) as clinically appropriate and safe. Specifically, residents reported self administration of medications and no evaluation was completed to determine if this was a safe practice. Resident identifiers: 32 and 79. Findings included: 1. Resident 32 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), heart failure, hypertension, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, unsteadiness on feet, cognitive communication deficit, asthma, dorsalgia, pain in bilateral knees, and encounter for palliative care. On 2/6/23 at 12:29 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 32. Resident 32 was observed to have a Wiexla Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) and Spiriva MDI located at bedside. Resident 32 stated that at first the nurse kept the inhalers, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was need to alter the residents treatment. Specifically, for 1 out of 41 sampled residents, the facility nursing staff did not notify the provider when a resident's blood sugar (BS) was greater than the indicated amount as per the physician order. Resident identifier: 47. Finding Included: Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to spina bifida, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, muscle weakness, bladder disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic pain, essential hypertension, and a colostomy. Resident 47's medical record was reviewed on 2/7/23 Resident 47's care plan was reviewed and revealed a care area with a focus area stating resident has diabetes mellitus type 2 with hyperglycemia. Interventions were identified and included as follows: 1. Diabetes medication as ordered by doctor. Monitor/document for side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 out of 41 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Specifically, the facility did not protect two residents from abuse by another resident. Resident identifier 2, 3, and 183. Findings included: 1. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sepsis, dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, unspecified disorder of personality and behavior, schizoaffective disorder, viral hepatitis C, glaucoma, delirium, history of malignant neoplasm, chronic pain syndrome On 2/6/23 at 10:55 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 31. Resident 31 reported having fallen on a couple of occasions while attempting to use the toilet. On 2/7/23 resident 31's medical records were reviewed. Review of resident 31's progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined for, 1 of 41 sampled residents, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid in subpart C of this to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort. Specifically, a resident who was assessed as needing a PASARR Level II evaluation did not have a PASARR Level II evaluation. Resident identifier: 50 Findings Include: Resident 50 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 12/21/22 with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease, encounter for palliative care, holiday relief care, chronic viral hepatitis C, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, memory deficit following other cerebrovascular disease, dependence on renal dialysis, atherosclerotic heart disease, restless legs syndrome, nicotine dependence, panic disorder, delusional disorders, general anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, essential hypertension, dysphagia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not provide the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene to residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Specifically, for 2 of 41 sampled residents, two dependent residents did not receive showers or bathing assistance in a timely manner and according to the facility schedule for showers. Resident identifiers: 24 and 133. Findings included: 1. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic pain, hypothyroidism, obesity, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. On 2/6/23 at 1:56 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 24. Resident 24 stated he was getting at least…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 41 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's choices. Specifically, hospice communication notes were not contained within the resident's medical records and staff reported difficulty with communication between the hospice providers. Resident identifier 32. Findings included: Resident 32 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), heart failure, hypertension, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, unsteadiness on feet, cognitive communication deficit, asthma, dorsalgia, pain in bilateral knees, and encounter for palliative care. On 2/06/23 at 12:21 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 32. Resident 32 stated that his hospice nurse came into the facility 2 times a week and the hospice Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) came 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 out of 41 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents who have not used a psychotropic drug were not given the drug unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and residents do not receive psychotropic drugs pursuant to a as needed (PRN) order for greater than 14 days unless the prescribing practitioner has documented a rationale to extend the use with a documented duration for the PRN order. Specifically, a resident received psychotropic medications and monitoring was not documented and another resident had a PRN order for Ativan that extended past 14 days without a documented rationale to extend the use and monitoring was not documented. Resident identifiers: 6 and 11. Findings Included: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but no limited to moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia, history of falling, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0779 — isolatedKeep signed and dated reports of x-rays and other diagnostic services in the residents record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 41 sampled residents, that the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record signed and dated reports of radiological and other diagnostic services. Specifically, a resident had a venous doppler and electrocardiogram (EKG) ordered and the results were not located in the residents medical records. Resident identifier 20. Findings included: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of alcohol withdrawal, dysphagia, alcohol induced pancreatitis, cirrhosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, cognitive communication deficit, viral hepatitis C, supraventricular tachycardia, stimulant abuse, abdominal pain, osteoporosis, hypertension, thrombocytopenia, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, anemia, opioid abuse, sensorineural hearing loss, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, intervertebral disc…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not provide or obtain routine dental services. Specifically, for 1 out of 41 sampled residents, a resident stated her dentures did not fit and needed to be adjusted. In addition, a dental appointment revealed the resident needed her dentures realigned. Resident identifier: 10. Findings included: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnose which included cerebrovascular disease, mononeuropathy, chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, caervicalgia, urinary tract infection, and chronic pain due to trauma. On 2/6/23 at 12:35 PM, resident 10 was interviewed. Resident 10 stated her dentures did not fit and were too big. Resident 10 stated she was unable to get new dentures because it was too soon. Resident 10's medical record was reviewed on 2/8/23. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed resident 10 had no broken or loosely fitting full or partial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure all professional staff were licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable State laws. Specifically, for 1 out of 41 sampled residents, a nurse with a suspended license was providing patient care and was not following the restrictions on their license. Resident Identifier: 47. Finding included: Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, spina bifida, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, muscle weakness, bladder disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic pain, essential hypertension, and a colostomy. On 2/6/23 at 12:31 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 47. Resident 47 stated that the Patient Care Coordinator (PCC) was a nurse that provided care for him until he was injured by the PCC. Resident 47 stated that the PCC yanked him up in bed by himself and made the wounds on his buttocks start to bleed. Resident 47 stated that the PCC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not establish an infection prevention and control program that included, an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. Specifically, for 2 out of 41 sampled residents, a resident with a urinary tract infection (UTI) was not treated for a pathogen that was listed on the urinalysis (UA). In addition, a resident with a UTI was treated with two antibiotics that were not listed on the susceptibility laboratory report. Resident identifiers: 15 and 68. Findings included: 1. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis, influenza, pneumonia, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, UTI, kiebsiella penumoniae, polyneuropathy, dysphagia, and super pubic catheter. On 2/7/23 at 9:30 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 15. Resident 15 stated he went to the hospital for a UTI. Resident 15 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 8 of 40 sample residents, that the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Specifically, floors were sticky, there were stains on the carpets, bathrooms had missing base boards, fans in the hallway were soiled, a wheelchair was not clean, and there was debris in resident rooms. Resident identifiers: 13, 21, 39, 41, 44, 51, 60 and 65. Findings include: 1. On 7/12/21 at 11:53 AM, an observation was made or room [ROOM NUMBER]. There were crumbs on the floor at the end of the bed. 2. On 7/12/21 at 11:55 AM, an observation was made of room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a black/brown substance dried on the floor at the bottom of the bed. 3. On 7/12/21 at 2:50 PM, an observation was made of a fan outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The fan was observed to have dried brown substance that had dripped down the front of the fan. 4. On 7/12/21 at 3:06 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 51. Resident 51's floor was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 8 of 40 sampled residents, that the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Specifically, a resident who smoked did not have a care plan, two residents who had an altercation with another resident did not have a care plan, a resident with a urinary tract infection (UTI) did not have a care plan, a care plan was not updated after resident sustained a fall with an injury, a resident with an altercations with another resident did not have a behavioral health care plan, and a resident with a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine did not have a care plan for the use of the machine. Resident identifiers: 5, 14, 23, 44, 45, 48, 51 and 52. Findings include: 1. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 40 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident that had urinary incontinence, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections. Specifically, a resident was observed saturated with urine for over 4 hours without incontinence cares. Resident identifier: 39. Findings include: Resident 39 was admitted to the facility at 5/21/2020 with diagnoses which included morbid obesity, adult failure to thrive, diabetes, post-traumatic stress disorder, dysphagia, heart failure and irritable bowel syndrome. On 7/14/21 at 8:46 AM, an observation was made of resident 39 in the hallway outside of the activities room. Resident 39 was sitting in a wheelchair with a visibly saturated urine spot in his groin area. At 8:55 AM, an observation was made of the Director of Nursing (DON) asking resident 39 if he wanted to lay down. Resident 39 was observed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 3 out of 35 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used in excessive dose (including duplicate therapy); or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued; or any of these combinations. Specifically, medications were not administered per the physician ordered parameters. Resident identifiers: 5, 40, and 182. Findings included: 1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of sialoadenitis, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, hepatitis A, biventricular heart failure, asthma, anemia, diabetes mellitus type 2, restless leg syndrome, chronic pain, hypothyroidism,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biological's were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, were stored under proper temperature controls, and included the expiration date when applicable. Specifically, multi use vials of medications were opened and available for use without a documented open date and medications were expired and still available for use. Findings included: 1. On [DATE] at 8:30 AM, the medication storage room on the Quail unit was inspected. A box of Biscolax laxative suppositories with one suppository remaining was available for use and had an expiration date of 3/2020. An opened multi use vial of Tuberculin was available for use, and did not contain an open date. An immediate interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2. LPN 2 stated that the Tuberculin should have an open date documented on the vial, and they use to also have a paper to document the open dates listed on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 6 of 40 sampled residents, that each resident did not received food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, residents complained of the food quality, resident council minutes revealed complaints of food quality, and a test tray revealed the food was not palatable. Resident identifiers: 50, 60, 62, 69, 76 and 278. Findings include: 1. On 7/12/21 at 12:05 PM, an observation was made of the lunch meal. The plate was observed to have a white piece of meat, white beans, white cabbage, and a cream colored bread product. There was a cookie served in a bowl. On 7/12/21 at 12:25 PM, an observation was made of the dining room. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated she was not sure what the food was when a resident asked her what the food was. 2. On 7/12/21 at 11:15 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 278. Resident 278 stated the food was inferior to other places and it was always cold. Resident 278 stated the food was not made very well and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, there was outdated and unlabeled food in the refrigerator, there were soiled areas in the kitchen, and food was transported uncovered through the hallways. Findings include: 1. On 7/12/21 at 10:30 AM, a tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made: a. There was a bin labeled sliced cheese dated 6/18 with a use by date of 6/24 in the refrigerator. b. There were individual cups with a white substances in them without a label or a date in the refrigerator. c. There were fruit cups dated 7/4 with a use by date of 7/11 in the refrigerator. d. There were 2 containers with watermelon in the refrigerator. One container had a use by date of 7/11. On the fridge a sign revealed all items must have a date and label hand written use by 3 days e. There was a steam table that had tin foil on the front…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included nondisplaced fracture of right femur, atrial fibrillation, cerebral infarction, dementia without behavioral disturbance, muscle weakness, dysphagia and lupus. On 7/13/21 at 9:57 AM, an observation was made of resident 24. Resident 24 was observed to be agitated and yelling she was going to kill Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 2. CNA 2 stated resident 24 did not have pressure ulcers. Resident 24's medical record was reviewed on 7/14/21. A hospice form titled RN (Registered Nurse) - Skilled Nursing Visit revealed a hospice note dated 6/18/21. The note revealed She has a healing unstageable wound on right buttocks and is on a hospital bed with pressure relief mattress. Wound improving somewhat per staff and aide report. No other hospice notes were located in resident 24's medical record. On 7/15/21 at 11:00 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4. LPN 4 stated that the hospice staff talk to her when they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined, that the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, including properly preventing and/or containing COVID-19. Specifically, observations were made of staff entering and exiting quarantine/droplet isolation precautions rooms without the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) donned, staff were observed to wear washable reusable gowns throughout the facility including in the isolation rooms without changing between resident rooms, meal trays from quarantine/droplet isolation rooms were not handled separate nor identified from other meal trays, a licensed nurse was observed to clean a blood pressure cuff with a 2 by 2 alcohol prep pad, multiple staff were observed to wear their surgical mask down below the nose or mouth while in resident care areas, and a resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-15 · tag F0923 — patternHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not have adequate outside ventilation by means of window, or mechanical ventilation, or a combination of the two. Specifically, there were odors throughout the facility during the survey. Findings include: 1. On 7/12/21 at 9:00 AM, the Northwest conference room smelled of urine. Staff moved the cloth chairs out of the room. 2. On 7/12/21 at 9:42 AM, urine odors were detected in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom. 3. On 7/12/21 at 10:10 AM, urine odors were detected in and outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. 4. On 7/12/21 at 12:55 PM, a urine odors were detected in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom. 5. On 7/14/21 at 2:00 PM, odors were detected outside rooms 32 through 41. There was a strong urine and bowel movement odor. 6. On 7/14/21 at 4:28 PM, urine odors were detected in the [NAME] hallway from room [ROOM NUMBER] south to the center of the hall, and the center hallway from the nurses' station to room [ROOM NUMBER]. 7. On 7/14/21 at 5:21 PM, urine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 40 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure each resident exercised their rights as a resident of the facility. Specifically, residents wanted to go to the grocery store and were not provided instruction on the process. Resident identifiers: 30 and 51. Findings include: 1. Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnose which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, schizophrenia, diabetes and obesity. On 7/12/21 at 3:06 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 51. Resident 51 stated she wanted to go to the store but could not go because her wheelchair would not fit in the van. Resident 51 stated that the Activities Director (AD) went to the store with a list from her but that was not the same as being able to go to the store. On 7/12/21, the facility activities calendar was reviewed and there were no activities for residents to go to the store. On 7/15/21 at 11:37 AM, an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 40 sampled residents, that the facility did not inform each resident periodically during the resident's stay, of services available in the facility and of charges for those services, including any charges for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate. Specifically, a resident was not issued a Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC) when the Medicare part A services were terminated and another resident did not have a signed copy of a NOMNC in their medical record. Resident identifiers: 128 and 129. Findings include: 1. Resident 128 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, memory deficit, aphasia, dysphasia, dementia, cognitive communication deficit, and encelopathy. Resident 128's medical record was reviewed on 7/14/21. Medicare services for resident 128 ended on 4/11/21. NOMNC was signed by resident 128 on 4/19/21, eight days after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 5 of 40 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure each resident had the right to be free from abuse and neglect. Specifically, the facility did not protect residents from another resident. Resident identifiers: 14, 17, 44, 45 and 51. Findings include: 1. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility 7/12/18 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included epilepsy and epileptic, displaced bicondylar fracture of right tibia, dysphagia, displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of right fibula, fracture of neck of left femur, cognitive communication deficit, anemia, age related osteoporosis, and history of left hip replacement. Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, generalized anxiety, panic disorder, and dysphagia. On 7/12/21 at 3:06 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 51. Resident 51 stated that she had a roommate (resident 44) hit her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 40 sample residents, that in response to allegations of abuse, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and prevented. Specifically, there was an allegation of physical abuse that were not thoroughly investigated, was not identified as abuse in the final investigation report, and residents were not protected. Resident identifier: 17 and 45. Findings include: Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia, diabetes mellitus, history of stroke, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's disease, depression and respiratory failure. On 7/12/21 at 10:20 AM, resident 45 was interviewed. Resident 45 stated that she liked not having a roommate. Resident 45 stated that she had issues with a previous roommate. On 6/25/21 at 2:56 PM, a Nurses Note revealed that resident 45 had pushed room[mate] to the floor and was on top of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 40 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that when the facility transferred a resident the receiving health care institution or provider received contact information for the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident, resident representative information including contact information, advance directive information, comprehensive care plan goals, all other necessary information for ongoing care, and a copy of the discharge summary to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. Specifically, a resident was transferred to the hospital without any transfer or discharge paperwork. Resident identifier 5. Findings included: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of sialoadenitis, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, hepatitis A, biventricular heart failure, asthma, anemia, diabetes mellitus type…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 40 sample residents, that the facility did not coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program. Including referring all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment. Specifically, after a resident was diagnosed with a mental illness there was no referral for a level II. Resident identifier: 35. Findings include: Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included frontotemporal dementia, memory deficit following cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder. Resident 35's medical record was reviewed on 7/13/2021. A review of resident 35's Pre-admission screening Application/Resident Review (PASRR) dated 4/16/2020 revealed there was no serious mental illness diagnoses. According to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined, for 1 of 40 sample residents, that the facility did not develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meets professional standards of quality of care. Specifically, a resident did not have a baseline care plan regarding assistance with eating, therapy or dietary needs. Resident identifier: 228. Findings include: 1. Resident 228 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included osteomyelitis, diabetes, toxic encephalopathy, diabetes, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, anemia, stage 3 kidney failure, and great toe amputation. On 7/13/21 at approximately 10:00 AM, resident 228 was observed in his room. Resident 228 had his eyes closed. Resident 228's bedside table was located approximately 2 feet away from his right side. On 7/14/21 at 8:03 AM, resident 228 was observed to be laying in his bed. His…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 40 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, one resident who was admitted for alcohol detoxification was drinking alcohol repeatedly without intervention and one resident who had urosepsis had a delay in treatment and required hospitalization. Resident identifiers: 40 and 43. Findings include: 1. Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included alcohol detoxification, muscle pain, surgical history, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), alcohol and opioid dependence, insomnia, and cirrhosis of the liver. On 1/22/21, resident 43 was referred to hospice services. On 7/12/21 at 9:30 AM, an observation was made of room [ROOM NUMBER]. A note on the door revealed that the resident was at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 2 of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident was not properly assessed to smoke independently and another resident was not provided adequate supervision while intoxicated and was allowed to continually leave facility unsupervised. Resident identifiers: 52 and 78. Findings include: 1. Resident 78 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included alcohol dependence with withdrawal, hematemesis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hypokalemia, mood disorder, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and epileptic seizures. Resident 78's medical record reviewed 7/14/21. A care plan focus initiated on 12/23/2020 revealed resident 78 was at risk for falls and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) r/t (related to)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 40 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences. Specifically, a resident who required a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine was not provided the machine. Resident identifier: 60. Findings include: Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paraplegia, encephalopathy, disorders of brain, respiratory failure, dysphagia, acute kidney failure, muscle weakness, post-traumatic stress disorder, neurogenic bladder, heart failure and diabetes. On 7/13/21 at 9:57 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 60. Resident 60 stated that he needed a CPAP machine and did not have one. Resident 60 stated he had not been sleeping well and would like to have a good night…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 2 of 40 sample residents, that the facility did not provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Behavioral health encompasses a resident's whole emotional and mental well-being. Specifically, a resident who was in crisis and abused another resident was not provided behavioral health services in the facility and was not provided interventions to avoid another crisis. Resident identifiers: 17 and 45. Findings include: Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia, diabetes mellitus, history of stroke, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's disease, depression and respiratory failure. On 7/15/21, resident 45's electronic medical records review was completed. Resident 45 was moved in with a roommate on 5/11/21. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 3 out of 40 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents who have not used a psychotropic drug were not given the drug unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and residents do not receive psychotropic drugs pursuant to a as needed (PRN) order for greater than 14 days unless the prescribing practitioner has documented a rationale to extend the use with a documented duration for the PRN order. Additionally, an unnecessary drug was any drug when used in excessive dose (including duplicate therapy); or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued; or any of these combinations. Specifically, a resident received duplicate therapy with two anti-anxiety medications and monitoring was not documented, a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0775 — isolatedKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 40 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that resident's laboratory reports were filed in the clinical record. Specifically, a resident had orders for laboratory reports that were not be located in the medical records. Resident identifier 5. Findings included: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of sialoadenitis, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, hepatitis A, biventricular heart failure, asthma, anemia, diabetes mellitus type 2, restless leg syndrome, chronic pain, hypothyroidism, mood disorder, hepatitis C, mitral stenosis, hypokalemia, insomnia, hypertension, rhinitis, major depressive disorder, history of pulmonary embolism, atrial-fibrillation, aortocoronary bypass graft, cardiac pacemaker, hyperlipidemia, pulmonary hypertension, cardiomyopathy, mitral valve insufficiency, gastro-esophageal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 40 sampled residents, that the facility did not have a written agreement with hospice that was signed by an authorized representative of the hospice and authorized representative of the LTC facility before hospice care was furnished to any resident. The written agreement must set out at least the following: The services that hospice will provide; The hospice responsibilities for determining the appropriate hospice plan of care; The services the LTC facility will continue to provide based on each resident's plan of care; A communication process; including how the communication was documented between the LTC facility and the hospice provider, to ensure that the needs of the resident were addressed and met 24 hours per day. Resident identifiers: 24 and 182. Findings include: 1. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included nondisplaced fracture of right femur, atrial fibrillation, cerebral infarction, dementia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-02-14 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined, the facility did not have the nurse staffing information posted. The facility must post the following information on a daily basis: Facility name, the current date, the total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), Certified Nursing Assistants, and the resident census. The facility must post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift and maintain the posted daily nurse staffing data for a minimum of 18 months. Additionally, the information must be displayed in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. Specifically, the nurse staffing information was not completed and readily accessible to residents and visitors. Findings included: On 2/9/23 at 7:40 AM, an observation was made throughout the facility for the nurse staffing information. No…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$149,703 in federal fines across 5 penalties.
- $87,712 — penalty dated 2025-10-24
- $51,503 — penalty dated 2024-05-09
- $2,797 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
- $2,447 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
- $5,244 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CASCADES HEALTHCARE — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCSPADDEN, DARIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| LANGFORD, SCOTT | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/18/2018 |
| CASCADES AT MOUNT OLYMPUS REHAB LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2018 |
| CASCADES HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| FULLMER, BRADEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2024 |
| FULLMER, CHAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/18/2018 |
| MUIR, GARTH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $436K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in UT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Utah Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 465006. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-05-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.