No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lincoln County Care Center

511 East Fourth Street, Shoshone, ID 83352 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 36 certified beds · (208) 886-2228 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (208) 886-2228 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
113 S Apple St · (208) 886-2224 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
120 S Apple St · (208) 886-2000 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
805 S Greenwood St · (208) 886-9933 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.6%15.6%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.2%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.0%2.0%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms14.0%15.1%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%3.0%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.0%16.1%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.7%16.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.4%96.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.9%3.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.1%22.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.4%20.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.8%1.4%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.93
RN hours/ resident / day
0.42
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.67
RN hoursweekends
42.9%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 26.9 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-15)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a clean, safe, homelike environment. This was true for all residents who resided in the facility whose environment were observed. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents were embarrassed by and/or felt the disrepair in the facility was unacceptable, disrespectful, or undignified or residents were injured due to unsafe areas in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Homelike Environment policy, revision date February 2021, documented residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible.The following areas were observed: a) On 4/12/26 at 10:30 AM, observed in room [ROOM NUMBER]-B on the wall behind bed, four strips with missing paint, with 4 holes in each strip. Multiple small holes were observed in the wall. The ceiling by the curtain railing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications available for residents were labeled, dated, and stored appropriately. This was true for 1 of 1 medication rooms and 1 of 1 medication carts audited for labeling and storage of medication. This failure created the potential for residents to have missed doses of medication, to receive expired medications with decreased efficacy, and residents to receive the wrong medication due to the medication label being illegible. Findings include:The facility's Storage of Medication policy revision date April 2019, documented:- discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed.- Scheduled II-V controlled medications are stored in separately locked, permanently affixed compartments.The EVENCARE ProView operator's manual documented:- Record the date on the bottle when you open a new bottle of test strips. Discard any unused test strips three months after opening.- Test strips are good three months after opening or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained prior to initiation of psychotropic medications for 2 of 3 residents (#1 and #35) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of receiving medications without knowledge of the reason why medications were prescribed, the expected benefits, and the risks associated with the medications. Findings include:The facility's Medication Therapy policy, version 1.1, documented 1. Each resident's medication regimen shall include only those medications necessary to treat existing condition and address significant risks. 2. Medication use shall be consistent with an individual's condition, prognosis, values, wishes, and responses to such treatments.Resident #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including heart failure and anxiety.A physician order dated 3/1/26, documented Citalopram Hydrobromide oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, policy review and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were initially assessed to determine if they were safe to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #35). This failure created the potential for adverse effects if residents self-administered medications inappropriately. Findings include:The facility's Self-Administration of Medications policy, revised date February 2021, documented, Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so.if it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this is documented in the medical record and the care plan. On 4/12/26 at 9:47 AM, observed Resident #35 had Calcitonin nasal spray on her overbed table. Resident #35 stated, she keeps it in her room for use when she needs it and had used it before she came to the facility.Resident #35's medical record had no documentation of an IDT patient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 2 of 12 residents (#12 and #35) reviewed for residents' rights. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if the resident could not call for assistance when needed or experienced an adverse medical event that required attention. Findings include: The facility's Answering the Call Light policy, version 1.3, documented. The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs.Ensure that the call light is accessible to the resident. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (disease process which causes decreased ability of the lungs to function) and dementia. On 4/12/26 at 9:59 AM, observed Resident #12 lying in bed with his call light plugged into the wall and hanging down the wall and under the foot of his bed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected resident's status. This was true for 2 of 12 residents (#11, and #15) whose MDS assessments were reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential for negative outcomes if the residents were not monitored properly due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include:Resident #11 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including epilepsy and dementia.On 4/12/26 at 11:20 AM, observed Resident #11 in his wheelchair. No restraints were observed in his wheelchair or in his bed.Resident #11's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], documented in section P0100. Physical Restraints, Other used daily, for restraint.Resident # 15 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including diabetes and acquired absence of the left leg above the knee.On 4/12/26 at 11:14 AM, observed Resident #15 lying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to refer residents for further evaluation when residents were diagnosed with a major mental illness. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level 2 evaluations. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if residents' specialized services for mental health needs were not evaluated by an appropriate state-designated authority. Findings include: The facility's Resident Assessments PASRR Screening Coordination policy, dated 4/25, documents 3. PASRR Level I and Level II screenings, when needed, will be conducted prior to the resident being admitted to the facility. 4. The facility will utilize Level II evaluation reports when conducting assessments of the resident, developing care plans. The State Operation Manual, Appendix PP revised on 7/23/25, documents a positive Level I screen necessitates an in-depth evaluation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide a resident's baseline care plan to the resident or his/her representative for 3 of 5 residents (#10, #30, and #35) reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure placed residents and their representatives at risk of not being informed and having input in their care plan. Findings include:The facility's Care Plans - Baseline policy, version 1.2, documented 3. The resident and/or representative are provided a written summary of the baseline care plan (in a language that the resident/representative can understand). 5. Provision of the summary to the resident and/or representative is documented in the medical record.Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including muscle wasting (the loss of muscle mass) and respiratory failureResident #10's medical record had not documented that a baseline care plan was provided and discussed with him or his resident representative.Resident #30 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure care was provided for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #3) per professional standards of practice. Findings include:Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including end stage renal disease and diabetes.Resident #3's care plan dated 5/13/25, documented she needed hemodialysis related to end stage renal disease and the listed following interventions:- administer medications as ordered- encourage Resident #3 to go for the scheduled dialysis appointments. Resident receives dialysis on (TUESDAY, THURSDAY, SATURDAY)Resident #3's physician's order dated 3/19/26, documented Amlodipine Besylate (calcium channel blocker used to treat hypertension), give 10 mg by mouth one time a day every Mon, Fri, Sun related to hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney disease or end stage renal disease. Hold for SBP less than 100 or pulse less than 60.Review of Resident #3's medical record did not contain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was accurate and posted daily for each shift. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility and their representatives, visitors, and others who wanted to review the facility's staffing levels. Findings include: The facility's Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing policy, revision date April 2025, documented. Direct care daily staffing numbers (the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents) are posted in the facility for every shift.On 4/13/26, the daily postings of licensed and unlicensed nurse staffing were reviewed between 11/1/25 - 4/11/26. There were no adjustments to the posted staffing when the scheduled hours did not match the actual hours worked.On 4/13/26 at 11:37 AM, the RNC and DON stated the facility does not make adjustments to the daily postings with actual hours worked, they only adjust the time on the daily assignment sheets.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and food test tray evaluation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident meals were palatable and maintained safe and appetizing temperatures to the residents. This had the potential to affect the 26 residents who resided in the facility who consumed meals prepared in the facility's kitchen. This failed practice had the potential to negatively affect the residents' nutritional status and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: The 2022 FDA Food Code states hot food will be maintained at 135 degrees F or above and cold food will be maintained at 41 degrees F or below. On 4/13/26 at 10:42 AM, during the Resident Council meeting, 6 of 6 residents stated the food served was often cold, tasteless, and not nutritious. The residents stated there are no condiments on the meal tray, especially when trays are delivered to their room, and the dinner meal is usually the worst meal of the day. On 4/14/26 at 11:27 AM, observed the lunch meal service with the following observations: - The menu documented the main entree was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the FDA Food Code, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was appropriately stored, distributed, and labeled, and cleaning logs were properly documented. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received meals prepared in the facility's kitchen. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination of food and adverse health outcomes including food-borne illnesses. Findings include:The FDA Food Code 2022, 3-501.17 documented, Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking . refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5 C (41 F) or less for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1.On 4/12/26 at 9:41 AM, observed the following:- the walk-in refrigerator contained one large, opened package of provolone cheese with no use by date. -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment. These failures had the potential to impact all residents in the facility by placing them at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include:The facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene Policy Revised date March 2022, documented use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water before and after eating or handling food.The facility's Homelike Environment policy revision date February 2021, documented the facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include a clean, sanitary, and orderly environment.The following was observed for hand hygiene:On 4/12/26 at 12:04 PM, observed 14 residents served their meals in the dining room. The residents were not offered hand hygiene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure all components of the baseline (initial) care plan were included upon resident's admission. This was true for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #129) reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure created the potential for harm when the baseline care plan failed to provide directions for care. Findings include: Resident #129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe) and diabetes. Resident #129's baseline care plan had not documented or addressed her mobility assistance needs. Resident #129's nursing progress note dated 4/9/25, documented resident is able to ambulate around facility using her walker. Resident #129's nursing progress note dated 4/10/25, documented resident is a stand by assist with some assistance into bed. Resident using a wheelchair in facility assist X 1 for mobility, she also uses a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's discharge summary included a reconciliation of medications (an accurate list of pre-discharge medications to post-discharge medications by creating an accurate list to prevent unintended changes or omissions at transition points in care). This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #27) reviewed for discharge. This failure created the potential for the receiving facility to not provide appropriate and timely care. Findings include: Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for neuroleptic induced parkinsonism (movement disorder with symptoms like Parkinson's disease as a side effect of taking certain medications) and major depression. On 4/15/25 at 4:02 PM, a record review of Resident #27's Nurse Progress Note, dated 1/15/25, documented resident was here for long term care and decided to move to a different facility. On 4/15/25 at 4:04 PM, Resident #27's Discharge Summary/Recap of Stay documented No -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0680 — isolated
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to employ a certified Activities Director (AD). This failure had the potential to affect residents' quality of life when design of activities appropriate for residents was not implemented. Findings include: During resident council meeting on 4/14/25, residents stated the AD left about a month ago and one of the CNA's stepped in to help with activities. On 4/14/25 at 1:00 PM, the Administrator stated they had not been able to hire a certified AD, so one of the CNA's had been assigned as an interim AD.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of care were followed. This was true for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #18) whose records were reviewed. This had the potential for adverse effects and possible harm to resident's medical and physical status. Findings include: Resident #18 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including left side hemiplegia and hemiparesis following stroke (weakness or the inability to move one side of the body, rather than complete paralysis) and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (caused by an imbalance in the load-capacity-drive relationship of the respiratory muscle pump). A) On 4/13/25 at 12:15 PM, observed Resident #18's left arm had a Lidocaine patch without date or initials of the nurse that applied the patch. On 4/15/25 at 2:20 PM, the DON stated the Lidocaine patch should have be labeled with the date applied and initials of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was accurate for each shift. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility and their representatives, visitors, and others who wanted to review the facility's staffing levels. Findings include: On 4/15/25, during review of nurse staffing hours, observed the scheduled and actual hours worked were documented with the number 1 instead of the hours worked on the following dates: - 10/1/24 - 12/9/24 - 12/10/24 - 12/11/24 - 3/15/25 On 4/15/25 at 3:15 PM, the DON stated the hours listed on the nurse staffing hours were both the scheduled and actual worked hours and the use of number 1 on these sheets was done in error.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were tracked and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who received controlled medication in the facility. Findings include: On 4/13/25 at 1:47 PM, during [NAME] hall medication cart audit, observed the narcotic accountability record, dated 4/1/25 to 4/13/25, with nine licensed nurse signatures not documented. On 4/13/25 at 1:54 PM, the DON stated two nurses should have signed the narcotic accountability sheet when they accepted the medication cart or released the medication cart. On 4/13/25 at 2:03 PM, during East hall medication cart audit, observed the narcotic accountability record, dated 4/1/25 to 4/13/25, with two licensed nurse signatures not documented. On 4/13/25 at 2:05 PM, the DON stated two nurses should have signed the narcotic accountability sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, Drugs.com review, Federal Drug Administration review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were monitored appropriately for medication use. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure created the potential for residents to experience adverse reactions due to the lack of appropriate monitoring. Findings include: Drugs.com documented Seroquel is an antipsychotic/antimanic agent that has a black box warning related to those with dementia. Seroquel may increase the risk of death in older adults with mental health problems related to dementia. The FDA requires manufacturers to place a black box warning on Seroquel and other antipsychotic drugs, highlighting the increased risk of death in elderly patients with dementia and that these drugs are not approved for the treatment of behavioral symptoms in elderly patients with dementia. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, policy review, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored in a locked compartment, and controlled medications were stored and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #26) and the facility. These deficient practices created the potential for undetected misuse of medications and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who receive medication in the facility. Findings include: The facility Administering Medications policy dated 3/25, documented under Policy Interpretation and Implementation #17, during administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse. 1. On 4/13/25 at 10:27 AM, observed a bottle labeled Tylenol arthritis at Resident #26's bedside. Bottle contained multiple tablets of medication. On 4/13/25 at 3:30 PM, Resident #26's medical record review had not documented an assessment for self-administration of medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, policy review, and review of the Idaho Food Code, the facility failed to appropriately store, distribute, and label foods. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received meals prepared in the facility's kitchen. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination and use of spoiled foods, and adverse health outcomes including food-borne illnesses. Findings include: The Idaho Food Code, revised February 2021, stated, 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking . refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5ºC (41ºF) or less for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1. The facility's Food Receiving and Storage policy dated 3/1/25, under Dry Food Storage documented dry foods and goods are handled and stored in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were consistently implemented. This was true for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for infection control when staff failed to perform effective hand hygiene during resident cares, and Hoyer lift cleaning between resident use. These deficient practices created the potential for harm by exposing residents to the risk of infection and cross contamination. Findings include: 1. The following was observed for hand hygiene. Resident #4 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including epilepsy and neurogenic bladder ( bladder control problems caused by brain, spinal cord, or nerve problems). On 4/15/25 at 11:52 AM, the following was observed in Resident #4's room: - Resident #4 was observed lying in bed, - LPN #1 and DON put on a protective gown and gloves and entered Resident #4's room to change her soiled brief, top, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents receiving a psychotropic medication had resident-specific target behaviors identified and monitored. This was true for 3 of 5 residents (#7, #19 and 34) who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents received medications that may result in negative outcomes without clear indication of need. Findings include: 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including depression and schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly). Resident #7's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/30/19, documented he had severe cognitive impairment, and received anti-depressant medication on 7 of the last 7 days. Resident #7's physician's orders included Fluoxetine Hydrochloride (anti-depressant) 40 mg once a day for depression, ordered on 4/2/18. Resident #7's Behavior care plan documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, policy review, and record review, it was determined facility failed to ensure medications were stored at appropriate temperatures and medications were appropriately labeled. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents received medications or vaccinations which had reduced efficacy from improper storage. Findings include: The facility's policy for Medication Storage in the Facility, dated 3/18, documented medications were maintained within the refrigerator temperature ranges of 36 degrees F (Fahrenheit) to 46 degrees F as recommended by the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). The policy also documented the facility should maintain a temperature log in the storage area to record temperatures at least once a day. The facility's policy for Storage of Medications, dated 4/07, documented The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. On 2/19/20 at 8:59 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-21 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained prior to administration of medication for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #34) who was reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of receiving medications without knowledge of the risks and benefits associated with the medications and the right to refuse the medications. Findings include: Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia. Resident #34's physician's order included Donezepil (used to treat confusion related to dementia) HCl (hydrochloride) 10 mg at bedtime, started on 2/12/20. Resident #34's record did not include documentation she consented to the Donezepil, or was informed about beneficial effects and possible side effects of the medication. On 2/20/20 at 11:00 AM, the Administrator said the facility did not obtain consent for Donezepil. Resident #34's record did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive resident-centered care plan included the use of oxygen and smoking. This was true for 2 of 12 residents (#7 and #34) whose comprehensive care plans were reviewed. This failure created the potential for residents to receive inappropriate or inadequate care with subsequent decline in health. Findings include: 1. The facility's Smoking policy, undated, documented any smoking related privileges, restrictions and concerns, such as a need for close monitoring, were noted on the care plan. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including COPD (progressive lung disease characterized by increasing breathlessness). Resident #7's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/30/19, documented he had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #7's record included a Smoking Safety Evaluation, dated 4/24/19, which documented he had smoked cigars and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, andresident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for 1 of 12 residents (#16) reviewed for quality of care. This created the potential for adverse effects or worsening of health status if residents did not receive care and services as ordered by the physician. Findings include: Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and dementia. Resident #16's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/30/19, documented she was cognitively intact. Resident #16's physician's order, dated 2/5/20, directed staff to cleanse her wound on her gluteal cleft with normal saline, pat dry, apply calcium alginate (type of wound dressing) and cover with Allevyn (a border dressing) every two days and as needed. Resident #16's 2/2020 TAR, documented her wound dressing was completed on 2/15/20, 2/17/20, and 2/19/20. On 2/19/20 at 10:05 AM, CNA #2 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations,staff interviews, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to follow current professional standards of nursing practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 5) who had a feeding tube. This deficient practice had the potential to affect resident care and a potential for a negative outcome in the provision of resident care. Findings include: The facility's policy for Maintaining Patency of a Feeding Tube (Flushing), dated 3/15, documented .6. Attach sixty ml catheter tip syringe with 10 to 30 ml (milliliters) of air to tube. Unclamp tube. 7. Verify placement of tube by aspiration. 8. Clamp tube and remove empty syringe. 9. Attach 60 ml catheter tip syringe without plunger to tube. Unclamp tube and unless otherwise ordered, pour 30 ml warm water into syringe. Allow water to flow by gravity into syringe. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis [loss of the ability to move] of all four limbs) and persistent vegetative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines during the administration of multi-dose medications and blood sugar monitoring for 2 of 6 residents (Resident # 5 and Resident #21) whose medication administration were observed. This deficient practice created the potential for the spread of infectious organisms from cross contamination. Findings include: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis of both arms and legs) and persistent vegetative state (a chronic state in which a person shows no signs of awareness) after a motor-vehicle accident. Resident #5's physician's order, included Lotemax (eye drops) 0.5% to both eyes two times daily for eye pain, ordered on 2/20/20. On 2/19/20 at 9:43 AM, during the medication pass RN #2 opened the multi-dose bottle of Lotemax and placed the open bottle and the lid directly on the resident's bed covers while she administered the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADES HEALTHCARE — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 51.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CASCADES AT LINCOLN COUNTY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2023
LINCOLN COUNTY EMSOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/1985
CRUMP, JASONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
FULLMER, CHADIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2023
MCSPADDEN, DARINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2023
MOORE, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
WHITE, DEREKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
BURDICK, ANITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
GIES, FLORIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
EELIR FLPOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2023
QUEST FLPOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2023
RONNMARK FLPOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2023
TAKAYAMA FLPOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2023
TOWER BRIDGE FLPOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$577K
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 5%Other / private 16%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $577K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$299per resident / day
operating cost
$9,076per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$273per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Idaho Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Idaho
$10,494/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,175/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 135056. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next