Parkdale Health and Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 29.6 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.38 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.57 to 0.93 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-12-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. Specifically, for 1 out of 20 sampled residents, a resident that developed pressure ulcers on both heels did not have the treatment implemented according to the physician's orders. In addition, the resident's left anterior pressure ulcer developed an infection. Resident identifier: 80. Findings included: Resident 80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis which included, but were not limited to, aftercare following joint replacement surgery, encounter for removal of internal fixation device, presence of left artificial hip joint, acute respiratory failure, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, difficulty in walking, benign prostatic hyperplasia, obstructive and reflux uropathy, hypertension, dementia, and acute kidney failure. Resident 80's medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2021-05-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 2 of 19 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choice. Specifically, facility staff did not obtain additional medical care for four days after a resident fell causing a broken leg above a recent artificial knee. This delay was determined to have occurred at a harm level. Additionally, a resident was transferred by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who did not lock the wheelchair wheels during the transfer causing the resident to fall. Resident identifiers: 11 and 22. Findings include: 1. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included left total knee replacement, osteoarthritis of the left knee, a wedge compression fracture of T11-T12 vertebra, anxiety disorder, osteoporosis, developmental disorder, and tremor. On 5/17/21 at 3:20 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a quality assurance and performance improvement program to evaluate and monitor resident falls in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who currently resided in the facility. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Quality Assessment and Assurance Plan, revised in December 2009, revealed, This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide Quality Assessment and Assurance Program designed to monitor and evaluate the quality of resident care, pursue methods to improve care quality, and resolve identified problems. Policy Interpretation and Implementation The primary purposes of the Quality Assessment and Assurance Plan are: 1. To provide a means to identify and resolve present and potential negative outcomes related to resident care and safety. Per the policy, 2. The Administrator is responsible for assuring that this facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Program complies with federal, state, and local…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address the supplemental oxygen usage for 4 (Residents #1, #8, #11, #23) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care and a care plan to address the fall status of 1 (Resident #16) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person - Centered, revised in January 2024, revealed, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objective and timetables to meet resident's physical, psychological and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The policy specified, 1. An admission Record revealed the facility readmitted Resident #23 on 04/05/2024, with diagnoses to include acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and congestive heart failure. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/12/2024, revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct neurological assessments following unwitnessed falls for 2 (Resident #16 and Resident #28) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Neurological Assessment, revised in October 2010, revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for a neurological assement:1) upon physician order; 2) when following an unwitnessed fall; 3) subsequent to a fall with a suspected head injury; or 4) when indicated by resident condition. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility originally admitted Resident #16 on 08/11/2022, with diagnoses to include abnormal posture, hypertension, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/02/2024, revealed Resident #16 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS revealed the resident required substantial/maximal assistance with sit to stand,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to maintain safety and prevent potential injury during smoke breaks for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. On 05/14/2024 at 11:57 AM, Resident #1 was smoking outside in the designated smoking area with a portable oxygen tank on the back of their wheelchair and, a nearby propane tank. The facility further failed to ensure 2 (Resident #16 and Resident #28) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents received adequate supervision and/or assistive devices to prevent falls. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Smoking Policy - Residents, revised in August 2022 revealed, 2. Smoking is only permitted in designated resident smoking areas, which are located outside of the building. Electronic cigarettes are permitted in designated areas only. Smoking is not allowed inside the facility under any circumstances. 3. Oxygen use is prohibited in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  3. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #11 on 04/16/2024, with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, obstructive sleep apnea, pneumonia, and bronchitis. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment References Date (ARD) of 04/22/2024, revealed Resident #11 used oxygen therapy. Resident #11's Order Summary Report, for the timeframe 04/16/2024 to 05/31/2024, did not reveal a physician's order for the resident's use of supplemental oxygen. On 05/13/2024 at 11:50 AM, Resident #11 was observed lying in bed with oxygen tubing on and an oxygen concentrator in the on position, set at two liters per minute. On 05/18/2024 at 9:53 AM, Resident #11 was observed in the hall by the nurses' station. The resident had oxygen tubing on and an oxygen concentrator in the on position, set at two liters per minute. During an interview on 05/14/2024 at 3:12 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated Resident #11 received supplemental oxygen ever since they admitted to the facility. During an interview on 05/14/2024 at 3:13 PM, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  4. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #21 on 03/21/2023, with a diagnosis to include shortness of breath. Per the admission Record, on 05/10/2024, Resident #21 received a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/10/2024, revealed Resident #21 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed the resident used oxygen therapy. Resident #21's care plan, initiated on 03/29/2023, revealed the resident had shortness of breath. Resident #21's Order Summary Report, that contained active orders as of 05/17/2024, revealed an order dated 08/29/2023, for ipratropium-albuterol inhalation solution, inhale three milliliters orally by way of nebulizer every six hours as needed for chronic obstructive pulmonary exacerbation. On 05/13/2024 at 10:05 AM and 05/16/2024 at 9:00 AM, Resident #21's nebulizer was observed uncovered on the resident's nightstand.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician after a resident sustained a fall for 1 (Resident #16) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Change in a Residents Condition or Status, revised in May 2024, revealed, Policy Statement Our facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a(n): a. accident or incident involving the resident. An admission Record revealed the facility originally admitted Resident #16 on 08/11/2022, with diagnoses to include abnormal posture, hypertension, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/02/2024, revealed Resident #16 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis was obtained for all psychotropic medications ordered for 2 (Resident #7 and Resident #11) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medication, psychotropic medications, and medication regimen review. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, dated July 2022, revealed, Residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. A psychotropic medication is any medication that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #7 on 04/01/2024, with diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, protein-calorie malnutrition, unsteadiness on feet, encephalopathy, pneumonia, end stage renal disease, arteriovenous fistula, bipolar disorder, and dependence on renal dialysis. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-18 · tag F0944 — widespread
  Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct mandatory training for all staff on the facility's quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program. This deficient practice affected all residents who currently resided in the facility, Findings included: A facility policy titled, Quality Assessment and Assurance Plan, revised in December 2009, revealed, This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide Quality Assessment and Assurance Program designed to monitor and evaluate the quality of resident care, pursue methods to improve care quality, and resolve identified problems. The policy did not address staff training on the facility's QAPI program. During an interview on 05/17/2024 at 5:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated there was not specific staff training on QAPI. During an interview on 05/18/2024 at 9:15 AM, the Administrator stated there had not been any staff training on QAPI. During an interview on 05/18/2024 at 9:35 AM, [NAME] Aide #17 stated he was not sure what QAPI was and had not received any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property for 4 of 7 sample residents were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. In addition, the facility did not report the results of all investigations to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$6,351 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $6,351 — penalty dated 2023-09-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADES HEALTHCARE — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $166K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT