Port Arthur Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
8825 Lamplighter Ln, Port Arthur, TX 77642 · For profit - Partnership · 199 certified beds · (409) 727-1651 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $310,553 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-04)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.8% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.2% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.9% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.2% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.5% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 36.3% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.3% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.8% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.7% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.06 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.77 | 2.06 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 6.9–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 199 beds and averages 65.3 residents a day — about 33% occupied, or roughly 134 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for Resident #1 with two staff members for bed mobility during incontinent care to prevent a fall with injury on 9/19/2024 which resulted in Resident #1 having complaint of pain to the right knee. An x-ray was conducted on 09/19/2024 with the results of evidence of acute fracture of the right distal femur (bone in the upper leg) requiring hospitalization for surgical intervention. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 09/19/2024 and ended on 09/24/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for injury and harm due to the lack of supervision provided by the facility. Findings included: Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 4 of 14 residents (Resident #2, #3, #4 and #5) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, #3, #4, and #5 were free of abuse from Resident #1. -On 07/10/24 Res #1 hit Res #3's head. -On 07/21/24 Res #1 hit Res #2 in the TV room. -On 07/22/24 Res #1 pushed Res #2 in the TV room. Res #2 sustained a head injury and was sent out to the ER for treatment. -On 09/02/24 Res #4 alleged Res #1 hit her. -On 11/24/24 Res #1 punched Res #3 in the forehead and chest. -On 12/28/24, Res #1 hit Res #5 in the face in the dining room The facility did not review, update, or implement interventions to include adequate supervision and continued to leave Resident #1 alone and unsupervised with other residents. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 02/26/25 at 2:00 p.m. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 2:15 p.m. While the IJ was removed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure CNA D had assistance from another staff member during incontinent care on 01/13/24 which resulted in Resident #1 rolling off the bed and being transferred to the hospital where she was diagnosed with a small left anterior frontal scalp hematoma. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 01/13/24 and ended on 01/15/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for falls resulting in injury, pain, and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/11/24 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE], and her diagnoses included quadriplegia (a symptom of paralysis that affects all a person's limbs and body from the neck down), gastrostomy (an opening into the stomach…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 11 of 27 residents (Resident #s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure the abuse coordinator and/or designee implemented the facility policy to report immediately to HHSC withing two hours of an allegation or incident of alleged abuse: 1. The facility failed to report immediately to the abuse coordinator and failed to report to HHS on 6/12/23, after LVN A was hit by Resident #5, LVN A assaulted Resident #5. She pushed Resident #5 hard against a wall, elbowed her in the face, and scratched her face. LVN A continued to work in the facility from the time of the incident (approximately 5:16 p.m.) until 9:11 p.m. on 06/12/23 and from 6 a.m. until 9:30 a.m. on 06/13/23. 2. The facility failed to report immediately to the abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free from abuse for 2 of 27 residents (Resident #s 5 and 10) reviewed for abuse in that: 1. On 6/12/23, after LVN A was hit by Resident #5, LVN A assaulted Resident #5. She pushed Resident #5 hard against a wall, elbowed her in the face, and scratched her face. LVN A continued to work in the facility from the time of the incident (approximately 5:16 p.m.) until 9:11 p.m. on 06/12/23 and from 6 a.m. until 9:30 a.m. on 06/13/23. 2. On 7/24/23 CNA B restrained Resident #10 by the wrists, put her hands around Resident 10's neck, and was rough with her during care. CNA B worked from the time of the incident (approximately 5:16 p.m.) until 10:03 p.m. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 10/31/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 2:32 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 11/02/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of actual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for infection prevention. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA D used PPE when she provided care to Resident #2 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for his suprapubic catheter. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA D did not place and leave Resident #2's suprapubic catheter bag on the floor. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA D performed hand hygiene before starting care, between glove changes and after completed care. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for infection.Findings include:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 02/23/2026, indicated a [AGE] year-old male, with an initial admission date of 01/01/2021 and a readmission date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for treatment and services related to indwelling suprapubic catheters. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's indwelling suprapubic catheter was secured on [DATE]. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's indwelling suprapubic catheter was a 16 FR (catheter with size of 5.3 mm) instead of an 18 FR (catheter with size of 6 mm diameter). These failures could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections, dislodgment, potential complications and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated [DATE], indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to review and revise resident's comprehensive care plans by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment to reflect the current condition for 1 of 18 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan was updated to indicate Resident #1 had a resident-to-resident incident on 07/18/2025 and 08/16/2025. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.The findings included: Resident #1Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 01/06/2026 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (mental health condition with a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder), cerebral infarction (lack of adequate blood supply to brain cells deprives them of oxygen and vital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for treatment and services related to indwelling catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Foley catheter (an indwelling catheter) was secured on 11/04/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections, dislodgment, potential complications and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of face sheet dated 11/04/2025 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (problem due to disease or injury of the central nervous system or nerves involved in the control of urination). Record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 11/03/2025 with a target date of 08/17/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with state and federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to medication carts for 1 of 4 Nurse medication carts (Hall 300 Nurse Cart) reviewed for medication storage. LVN A failed to ensure the Hall 300 Nurse medication cart was kept locked and under direct observation where residents and unauthorized staff could not access it when left at the main nurse's station for five minutes on 11/04/2025 at 9:23 a.m. This failure could place residents at risk of unauthorized persons, as well as residents, at risk of gaining access to unlocked medications that were not prescribed to them.Findings included: During an observation on 11/04/2025 from 9:23 a.m. to 9:28 a.m., indicated the Hall 300 Nurse medication cart was noted to be unsecured and unsupervised on hall 300. The Hall 300 Nurse medication cart was front facing with the drawers facing the hallway with the lock mechanism out (indicating it was unlocked).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for residents, staff, and the public, for 2 of 4 shower rooms (Hall 300 and Hall 400) reviewed for physical environment. Hall 300's shower room had two shower chairs soiled with brownish/black substance under seats and on frames. Hall 400's shower room had a shower bed and under the cushion with a thick black substance. This failure could lead to residents experiencing a diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. During an observation and interview on 06/23/2025 at 10:45 a.m., two shower chairs were soiled with brown and black substances on the seat, under the seats and on frame. The wall in shower on the right side has area (approximately four 12 x 12 tile squares and approximately 4 x 6 baseboard) were soiled with black substance. LVN C said shower chairs should be cleaned before and after each use. She said the staff who provide the showers were responsible for cleaning between uses. During an observation and interview on 06/23/2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal and physical abuse for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents #3, #9, #37, and #55) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was free from physical abuse when Resident #61 rolled up in her wheelchair and slapped Resident #3 on the face on 05/28/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9 was free from verbal abuse when Resident #46 cursed her and told her it was her fault her daughter died on [DATE]. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #37 was free from physical abuse when Resident #46 walked up to her, grabbed her by the wrists, and shook her on 06/11/25. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55 was free from physical abuse when Resident #45 hit her on the arm when she backed into him with her wheelchair on 06/14/25. This failure could place residents at risk for emotional distress, fear, decreased quality of life and further abuse. Findings included:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, meet professional standards of quality for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for following physician orders. (Residents #46 and #317) 1. The facility did not administer a new medication Depakote prescribed to Resident #46 for behaviors as ordered. 2. The facility did not obtain a urine specimen on Resident #317 for a UTI Panel prior to ABT administration as ordered. These failures could place the residents at risk of not having their individual needs met and of not receiving adequate care and medical interventions to maintain their health and prevent worsening health conditions. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 06/11/25 indicated Resident #46 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included traumatic brain injury (an injury to the brain caused by an outside force), bipolar disorder (mental disorder associated with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 5 medication carts(400 Hall cart) and 1 of 1 treatment carts (Station 2 Nurse Cart) reviewed for medication storage. - The facility failed to ensure the medication treatment cart was locked when left unsecured and unsupervised at the main nurse station. - The facility failed to ensure Hall 400 Nurse Cart did not contain loose pills. - The facility failed to ensure an insulin pen of basaglar insulin (long acting insulin used to lower blood sugar) had a date as to when it was opened. These failures could place residents at risk of adverse reactions to medications, misappropriation of medications and not receiving therapeutic effects of medication. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 06/23/2025 at 09:00 a.m., the medication treatment cart was noted to be unsecured and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a need to alter treatment for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for physician notification. (Residents #46 and #317) 1. The facility failed to notify the physician of Resident #317 when an ordered UTI Panel specimen was not obtained. 2. The facility failed to notify the physician of Resident #46 when he missed 2 doses of Depakote a new medication prescribed for behaviors. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate medical treatments, which could result in a decline in health. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated indicated Resident #317 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included pyelonephritis (a type of urinary tract infection that usually moves from your bladder to your kidneys), injuries of the head, and quadriplegia (a loss of motor function in all four limbs). Record review of physician order for May 2025 indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status for 1 of 23 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. (Resident #s 14) The facility did not accurately complete the MDS assessment to indicate Resident #14 did not have a restraint/ side rail. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 06/23/25 indicated Resident #14 was a [AGE] year-old female readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interfere with daily function) and bipolar disorder (disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). Record review of the most recent quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #14 was severely impaired of cognition and needed supervision for sit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review , the facility failed to accurately submit a PL1 (PASRR Level 1 Screening) screening when a resident admitted with a diagnosis of Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability or Developmental Disability for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for PASRR screenings. (Resident # 29) The facility failed to submit a new PL1 screening when Resident #29 was readmitted from mental health hospital on [DATE] . This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving specialized services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #29's face sheet dated 06/25/25 was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] . She had diagnoses of convulsions (uncontrolled jerking, loss of consciousness and other symptoms caused by abnormal electrical activity in the brain), and stroke. Record review of Resident #29's annual MDS dated [DATE] indicated she was not PASRR positive and had a BIMS score of 00 indicated severely impaired with cognition. The assessment indicated she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tracheostomy care. (Resident #317) LVN A did not change Resident #317's outer tracheostomy cannula on 05/11/25 as listed on the May 2025 MAR. This failure could place residents with a tracheostomy at risk for infections to the tracheostomy site. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated indicated Resident #317 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included injuries of the head, quadriplegia (a loss of motor function in all four limbs), and tracheostomy status (an opening in the neck in order to place a tube into a person's windpipe so they can breath). Record review of physician orders for May 2025 indicated Resident #317 had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #117) of seven residents and one of five medication carts(Hall 400 cart) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure all of Resident #117's medications was administered as ordered by the physician resulting in the incorrect dose of Vitamin C administration. The facility failed to ensure three insulin pens of aspart insulin were removed from use. Aspart insulin (rapid acting insulin used to lower blood sugar), with open date of 04/25/25, had been expired for 31 days, open date of 05/19/25, had been expired for 9 days, and open date of 05/23/25, had been expired for 5 days. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered by their physicians and exacerbations of their medical conditions.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary medication for 1 of 23 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. (Resident #22) The facility failed to hold two of Resident #22's blood pressure medications when the blood pressure and/or heart rate was outside the prescribed parameters. This failure could place the residents at risk for adverse consequences and decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #22's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #22's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/21/25, indicated a BIMS score of 13 indicating Resident #22 was cognitively intact. Hypertension was included as one of Resident #22's diagnoses. Record review of Resident #22's care plan dated 03/06/2025 indicated a diagnosis of hypertension. Interventions included Give anti-hypertensive medications as ordered. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported, immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse. The admission Coordinator failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the Abuse Coordinator immediately. Resident #4 reported allegations to the admission Coordinator on 05/26/25 that an un-named CNA was verbally aggressive, physically aggressive and he feared for his safety. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Findings included: Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 out of 3 (Resident #2 and Resident #3) residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and the wound care process for infection control practices. LVN B failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions while providing wound care for Resident #3. The facility failed to ensure LVN C followed appropriate infection control during wound care treatment for Resident #2. The failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission Record, dated 06/04/25, indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including migraine, essential hypertension, and local infection of the skin. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate and report the findings of the investigation to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident for 2 of 7 residents (Residents #6 and #7) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to investigate and submit the results of their investigation within 5 days after Resident #6 slapped Resident #7 on 05/20/24. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish and emotional distress. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 02/20/25 indicated she was a [AGE] year old female admitted on [DATE] and her diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness) affecting right dominant side, aphasia (a language disorder that prevents effective communication), anxiety (fear, dread and other symptoms that are out of proportion to the situation), and schizoaffective disorder (mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a need to alter treatment for 2 of 24 residents (Residents #68 and #71) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in condition when Resident #68's blood pressure was SBP>160, and DBP>90. (Systolic blood pressure refers to the amount of pressure experienced by the arteries while the heart is beating. Diastolic blood pressure refers to the amount of pressure in the arteries while the heart is resting in between heartbeats) The facility failed to ensure the physician was consulted regarding holding Resident #71's medication when vital signs were outside the prescribed parameters. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate medical treatments, which could result in severe illness or hospitalization. Findings included: 1. Record review of face sheet dated 05/15/24 indicated Resident #68 was a [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the rights of residents to be free from abuse or neglect for 2 of 18 residents reviewed for abuse or neglect. (Residents #s 16 and 28) The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 was free from verbal abuse by a staff member. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28 was free from physical abuse when his roommate grabbed his arm causing redness. The failure could place residents at risk for abuse/neglect, humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 05/13/24 indicated Resident #16 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE]. Her diagnosis included schizoaffective disorder. (A mental health disorder that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression or mania) Review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #16 had a BIMS of 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 3 of 18 residents (Resident #s 16, 28 and 72) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 was free from verbal abuse from CNA A. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28 was free from physical agression. The facility failed to ensure Resident #72 was free from physical aggression from Resident #72 who grabbed his arm while standing over him resulting in redness to his forearm. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: Record review of the Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated April 2021 indicated Policy Statement Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes freedom from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse of residents were reported immediately to the administrator and to HHSC within the 2-hour period for 3 of 18 residents (Resident #16, #28, and #72) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure allegations of resident-to-resident altercations and resident and staff altercations were reported immediately to the administrator and to the State Agency no later than 2 hours after the incident occurred or was suspected. The facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse to the administrator and to the State Agency within 2 hours when Resident #16 was involved in verbal altercation with CNA. The facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse within 2 hours to the State Agency when Resident #72 grabbed Resident #28. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the status for 2 of 18 residents reviewed for assessments. (Residents #21 and #40). The facility failed to complete an accurate resident assessment for Resident #21. Resident #21's resident assessment did not indicate she received special treatments, procedures, and programs of tracheostomy care. The facility failed to complete an accurate resident assessment for Resident #40. Resident #40's resident assessment did not indicate he received special treatments, procedures, and programs of dialysis. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 05/14/24 indicated Resident #21 was a [AGE] year-old female readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included quadriplegia (a symptom of paralysis that affects all a person's limb and body from the neck down) and tracheotomy status (has a hole in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Resident #20) The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's fingernails were trimmed. The resident had contractures to the left upper fingers and thumb. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to maintain their highest level of physical, mental and psycho-social well-being. Findings included: Record review of physician orders dated May 2024 indicated Resident #20, admitted [DATE], was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of hemiplegia/hemiparesis (a condition that causes paralysis or weakness on one side of the body) and a stroke. Record review of the most recent quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #20 had a BIMs of 5 (severe cognitive impairment), had a decrease in ROM to one side of his upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Resident #20) The facility did not ensure Resident #20 had a splint to the left contracted hand as ordered. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included: Record review of physician orders dated May 2024 indicated Resident #20, admitted [DATE], was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of hemiplegia/hemiparesis (a condition that causes paralysis or weakness on one side of the body) and stroke. The orders indicated the resident was to receive a resting hand splint for left and wrist to treat and correct contracture dated 03/12/24. The orders indicated the resident was ordered physical therapy on 9/8/23 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for oxygen administration. (Resident #15) The facility failed to administer Resident #15's oxygen at 2 liters as ordered. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included: Record review of physician orders dated May 2024 indicated Resident #15, readmitted [DATE], was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heartbeat that commonly caused poor blood flow), morbid obesity and tobacco use. The order indicated the resident received oxygen at 2 liters nasal cannula continuously for shortness of breath active date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident to ensure the accurate administration of medications for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident #40) The facility did not document blood pressure (BP) or heart rate (HR) for Resident #40 on the MAR, before administering medications with orders that included instructions to hold for prescribed parameters. This failure could place residents with prescribed medication parameters at risk of not receiving the desired therapeutic effects of their medications. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 05/13/24 indicated Resident #40 was a [AGE] year-old male readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of an, Employee In-Service Record,dated 03/04/24 indicated The DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 18 residents reviewed. (Resident #71) The facility did not hold Resident #71 metoprolol tartrate when the resident's heart rate was outside parameters set by the physician. This failure could place the residents at risk of adverse side effects from medications. Findings included: Record review of physician orders dated May 2024 indicated Resident #71, admitted [DATE], was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnosis including essential hypertension (high blood pressure). Resident #71 was prescribed Metoprolol Tartrate - give 12.5 mg by mouth twice daily for hypertension, hold for SBP below 100 or DBP below 60 or pulse below 60. Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #71 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated cognition was intact. She had a diagnosis of hypertension and heart failure. Review of Resident #71's care plan revised on 04/24/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 4 of 12 residents (Resident #1, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6) reviewed for accuracy of medical records. The facility failed to document weekly wound assessment to Resident #1's inner left ankle trauma wound the week of 01/30/2024. The facility failed to document ordered wound care to Resident'#1's inner left ankle trauma wound on 01/25/2024, 02/02/2024, 02/08/2024, 03/29/2024 and 03/30/2024. The facility failed to document Resident #4, and Resident #5 wounds were assessed weekly, and care was performed as ordered. The facility failed to document weekly skin assessments to Resident #1, Resident #5, and Resident #6. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of having incomplete or inaccurate records and inadequate care. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for behavioral health services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received behavioral health services after returning to facility following an inpatient stay at behavioral health hospital for a resident-to-resident altercation with behavioral symptoms occurred. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving behavioral health services and a decline in Quality of life. Findings Included: 1. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 04/14/2024 indicated he was [AGE] years old, initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] after an admission to behavioral hospital following a resident-to-resident altercation. Resident #2 with newly onset (02/22/2024) diagnoses including Major Depressive Disorder (mental illness that negatively affects how you…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for 12 of 12 resident rooms (Room #s 302, 304, 306, 307, 311, 401, 403, 406, 502, 503, 505, and 510) reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure the air conditioning units were clean in 12 residents' rooms. There was unknown black substance coating the vents. This failure could place the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and infection due to unsanitary conditions. Findings included: Observations on 10/26/23 from 2:00 p.m. through 5:00 p.m., 10/27/23 from 9:00 a.m. through 4:30 p.m., 10/30/23 8:15 a.m. through 4:30 a.m., 10/31/23 from 8:15 a.m. through 2:00 p.m., and 11/01/23 from 9:00 a.m. through 4:00 p.m. indicated there were 12 rooms (Room #s 302, 304, 306, 307, 311, 401, 403, 406, 502, 503, 505, and 510) with air conditioning units with an unknown black substance coating the vents. During an interview on 10/31/23 at 10:48 a.m. HSK Y said she did not know why the vents were not properly cleaned and would have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (which included to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 11 of 27 residents (Resident #s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11) reviewed for abuse in that: 1. The facility failed to report to the state on 6/12/23, after LVN A was hit by Resident #5, LVN A assaulted Resident #5. She pushed Resident #5 hard against a wall, elbowed her in the face, and scratched her face. LVN A continued to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the medical record of each resident was accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 27 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's fall on 10/09/23 was documented. This failure could place residents at risk for delayed care and appropriate interventions. Findings included: Record review of Resident #12's face sheet dated 11/06/23 indicated he was an [AGE] year old male, admitted on [DATE], and his diagnoses included Alzheimer's (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), lack of coordination (uncoordinated movement is due to a muscle control problem that causes an inability to coordinate movements), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), and anxiety (a feeling of fear,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve resident grievances for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for grievances. The facility did not immediately address concerns related to Resident #1's nutritional needs, feeding pump, possible weight loss, or room cleanliness. The facility did not address grievances from resident council meetings. This failure could place all residents at risk of unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 09/20/23 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year old female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses head injury, aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech caused by brain damage), diabetes (a disease that occurs when blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high), pain, anemia (a low number of red blood cells), tracheostomy (a procedure to help air and oxygen reach the lungs by creating an opening into the trachea (windpipe) from outside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 of 1 unsecured chemical storage reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure chemicals were in a secured location. This failure could place residents, staff and visitors at risk of living, working or being in an unsafe environment. Findings included: During an observation on 09/20/23 at 11:28 a.m., the housekeeping storage room door adjacent to the common TV area was left open and unlocked. There were residents watching TV and passing by the storage room on their way to other areas of the facility. Observation on 09/20/23 at 11:28 a.m. of the storage room contents indicated the following cleaning and chemical products: Glass cleaner, Disinfectant #1, Disinfectant #2 (concentrate), Non-acid bowl and bathroom disinfectant cleaner, and Drain Fly-Odor-Waste Control. Record review of the glass cleaner safety sheet dated 01/24/23 indicated it may be harmful if swallowed, may cause skin irritation, inhalation of vapors or mist may cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement written policy to prhibit and prevent abuse, neglect,and exploitation of resident and misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 19 residents (Resident #87) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to implement facility's written abuse policy to ensure the Housekeeping Supervisor did not verbally abuse Resident #87. This failure could place residents at risk for psychosocial harm and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the facility policy titled Abuse -Prohibiting Policy, revised 11/2015, indicated The Administrator will ensure that the residents residing in the facility will remain free from verbal . abuse, . and misappropriation of resident property. Reporting abuse any person who suspects abuse, neglect or misappropriation . may have occurred must immediately report the alleged violation to their immediate supervisor or the Administrator of the facility, State Survey Agencies and Law Enforcement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, which included injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, which included the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 19 residents (Residents # 87 and #37) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 1. The facility's abuse/neglect coordinator failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse that occurred on 3/26/23 to HHSC timely for Resident #87. 2. The facility failed to report a potential allegation of misappropriation of property that occurred on 3/25/23 to HHSC timely for Resident #37. These failures could place residents at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the residents status assure that each resident received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment, by staff qualified to assess relevant care areas and who are knowledgeable about the resident's status for 2 of 19 residents (Residents #4 and #63) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. (Resident #4 and #63) 1. The facility failed to accurately assess Resident #4 for smoking. 2. The facility failed to accurately assess Resident #63 for PASRR positive. This These failures could place the residents at risk for not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain the highest level of well-being. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #4's physician orders, dated March 2023, indicated Resident #4,the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and, was 66- years -old male with diagnoses of which included cerebral infarction (damage to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 19 residents (Residents #25 and #41) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25 was care planned for Hospice services. 2. The facility failed to follow physician orders related to a blood pressure medication for Resident #41. These failures could place the residents at risk for not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included: 1. Record review of physician orders dated March 2023 indicated Resident #25, admitted [DATE], was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease and a stroke. The resident was admitted to hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, unless the residents clinical condition demonstrated that it was not possible or the residents' preferences indicated otherwise, based on a resident's comprehensive assessment for 1 of 19 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for weight loss. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25 received a health shake supplement as ordered for the noon meal on 03/28/23. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included: Record review of physician orders dated March 2023 indicated Resident #25, , admitted [DATE], was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis to one side of the body), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). An order initiated on 3/15/23 indicated the resident was to have health shakes with meals. Record review of a significant change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, based on a comprehensive assessment of a resident, to ensure residents' who used psychotropic drugs were adequately monitred and free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #48) whose records were reviewed for psychotropic drugsunnecessary medications. (Resident #48) The facility failed to monitor Resident #48 for side effects of antidepressant medication. This failure could place residents at risk for adverse drug reactions of psychotropic medications such as dizziness, fatigue and sleep disturbances. Findings included: Record review of a Resident #48's face sheet indicated Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]., The resident was a [AGE] years old male with a diagnosis of which included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Record review of a Resident #48's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 2/14/23, indicated Resident #48 had a BIMS score of 4,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure Tray Aide B [dietary staff] prepared food wore a hair restraint while in the kitchen. This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination. Findings included: During an observation on 03/27/23 at 8:23 a.m., Tray Aide B stood in front of the steam table without a hair restraint covering his hair, which was approximately ¼ inch long, where the cook was plating, uncovered, breakfast foods (scrambled eggs, bacon, oatmeal, and toast) and handing them to Tray Aide B to load on a cart for delivery to residents. During an observation and interview on 03/27/23 at 08:24 a.m., Tray Aide B said he was not wearing a hair restraint or head covering because he forgot to put it on this morning. He said he was supposed to wear one while in the kitchen. He said he had received training on covering his hair while working in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement established policies, in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety that also took into account nonsmoking residents for 1 of 2 smoking areas (secured smoking area) reviewed for smoking safety. The facility failed to maintain the smoking area located outside the facility's secure unit. This failure could place smoking residents residing in the secure unit at risk of an unsafe smoking environment. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 03/27/2020 at 1:30 p.m., during smoke break outside the secure unit, revealed more than 100 partially smoked cigarettes covering the ground on both sides of a walkway where smokers sit to smoke. A metal ashtray was mounted in the smoking area that had a self-closing device so cigarette butts could be emptied into the depository below. The ashtray had cigarette butts piled on top of it leaving no room for any others to be added or cigarettes to be extinguished. Sticking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-05-15 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility with more than 120 beds failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for social worker qualifications. The facility failed to employ a qualified social worker full-time for all residents residing there. The facility was without a full-time SW for approximately 6 months (from November 2023 - present date, May 2024). This failure could place residents at risk of social service and psychosocial needs not being met. Findings included: During an interview on 05/13/24 at 10:10 a.m., the HR staff said the SW was only as needed and worked some weekends. She said the facility was still searching for a full time SW. During an interview on 05/14/24 10:45 a.m., the SW said she worked at this facility on weekends when she could. During an interview and record review of staff training and licensure on 05/15/24 at 12:45 p.m., the HR indicated the SW currently employed, worked as needed and did not work full time. She said the last time the facility had a full time SW was 11/02/23. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-05-15 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program was provided for 8 of 23 staff (Dietary Supervisor, ADON W, LVN T, LVN U, Laundry Supervisor, CNA E, CNA X and CNA V) reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure that Dietary Supervisor, ADON W, LVN T, LVN U, Laundry Supervisor, CNA E, CNA X and CNA V completed the QAPI training. This failure could place residents at risk for staff not being aware of the QAPI program injury or improper care due to a lack of training. The findings were: 1. Record review of the staff roster, undated, indicated Dietary Supervisor was hired on 09/14/22. Record review of the Dietary Supervisor's training record- undated, indicated no QAPI training from 09/14/22 to 05/15/24. 2. Record review of the staff roster, undated, indicated the ADON W was hired on 03/25/20. Record review of the ADON W's training record, undated, indicated no QAPI training from 03/25/20 to 05/15/24. 3. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$310,553 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $17,621 — penalty dated 2025-06-04
- $71,152 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
- $17,095 — penalty dated 2024-03-18
- $204,685 — penalty dated 2023-11-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CASCADES HEALTHCARE — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIBERTY COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO 1 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2014 |
| SENIOR REHAB HOLDINGS, LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2021 |
| CRUMP, JASON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| FULLMER, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| MCSPADDEN, DARIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| STRATTON, CHARLES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 12/01/2014 |
| WHITE, DEREK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| CASCADES AT SENIOR REHAB LP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/31/2025 |
| LONE STAR ASSETS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| SAIMAA FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| TAKI FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| CASCADES HEALTHCARE OF TEXAS, LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/31/2025 |
| AURALA, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| CRUMO, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| GULF ASSETS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| HITORI HOSHI, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| JIAN, PETER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/11/2025 |
| RICHARDSON, BROOKLYN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/11/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $480K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675541. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.