Four Corners Regional Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 50.1 residents a day — about 48% occupied, or roughly 54 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.91 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.05 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Hcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease with dyskinesia, dementia, insomnia, monoplegia of upper limb, dysphagia, myalgia, and muscle spasms. Resident 52's medical record was reviewed on 1/6/25 through 1/9/25. A care plan Focus initiated on 7/31/19, documented [Resident 52] is High risk for falls r/t Parkinson's disease, poor safety awareness, impaired balance, impaired mobility, impulsiveness frequently taking all of his clothing out of the closet and drawers and throwing them on the floor. The Focus was revised and canceled on 12/27/23. No new fall interventions were implemented in 2023. An annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed resident 52 had a BIMS score of 3, indicating significant cognitive impairment. The assessment also revealed resident 52 required one person extensive assistance for transfers, walking, and locomotion in the facility, and toileting. A fall risk assessment dated [DATE], determined that resident 52 was a high fall risk.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-03-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI). Specifically, for 1 out of 23 sampled residents, facility staff did not: promptly respond with the resident presented with signs and symptoms of a UTI; ensure the resident received an antibiotic susceptible to organism causing the UTI; and, obtain antibiotic order clarification when a disparity existed. Resident identifier: 10. Findings included: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, senile degeneration of brain, dementia, atrial fibrillation, essential hypertension, insomnia, and cellulitis. Resident 10's medical record was reviewed on 3/14/23. A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], documented that resident 10 was occasionally incontinent of bladder and always continent of bowel. In addition,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-09 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility did not have the nurse staffing information posted. The facility must post the following information on a daily basis: Facility name, the current date, the total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, Certified Nursing Assistant, and resident census. The facility must post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift and maintain the posted daily nurse staffing data for a minimum of 18 months. Specifically, the nurse staffing data was not posted on a daily basis and the nurse staffing data was not complete. Findings included: On 1/6/25 at 4:21 PM, an observation of the nurse staffing information was completed. The nurse staffing information was dated 1/5/25, and did not include the actual hours of the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff. On 1/8/25 at 8:00 AM, an observation of the nurse staffing information was completed. The nurse staffing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately but not later than two hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury to officials including the State Survey Agency (SSA) and Adult Protective Services (APS). Specifically, for 6 out of 39 sampled residents, allegations of resident to resident abuse and injuries of unknown origin were not reported timely to the SSA or APS. In addition, allegations of resident to resident sexual abuse and neglect were not reported to the SSA or APS. Resident identifiers: 13, 17, 31, 36, 49, and 53. Findings included: 1. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, asthma, heart failure,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment did not have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated. Specifically, for 13 out of 39 sampled residents, allegations of resident to resident sexual abuse, injuries of unknown origin, and neglect were not investigated or the allegations were not investigated thoroughly. Resident identifiers: 13, 17, 32, 36, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, 51, 54, and 55. Findings included: 1. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, asthma, heart failure, major depressive disorder, essential hypertension, and pressure ulcer stage two. On 1/6/25 at 2:56 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 13. Resident 13 stated she had a resident to resident incident in the dining room the other day. Resident 13 stated that one little old man that ate in the dining room was a little on the horny side and he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biological's) to meet the needs of each resident. Specifically, the facility staff were taping narcotic medications back into the medication cards. Findings included: On 1/8/25 at 8:00 AM, an observation was made of the facility Team 1 medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2. The following medications were observed in the medication cart: a. A multi dose medication card which held Oxycodone 5 milligram (mg) had the back of pocket numbers 26 and 27 that were opened with tape now closing them, there were no medications observed in the pockets. b. A multi dose medication card which held Hydrocodone - Acetaminophen 5-325 mg had the back of pocket number 34 that was opened with tape now closing it, there was no medication observed in the pocket. An immediate interview was conducted with LPN 2. LPN 2 stated the nurses would do the narcotic count at change of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food items in the walk-in freezer, walk-in refrigerator, and dry food storage room were open to the air and several areas throughout the kitchen had floor tiles that were damaged. Findings included: On 1/6/25 at 1:50 PM, an initial walk-through of the kitchen was conducted. In the walk-in refrigerator, three containers with green lids were observed to be without labels or dates. The tall container contained a thin, creamy liquid. One of the short containers contained a meat patty, and the other short container contained what appeared to be sliced meat. In the walk-in freezer, a box of cinnamon roll dough was found to be open to air. In the dry storage room, a box of bacon bits was open to air. An observation in the dish machine area revealed a large area from the drain on the floor to under the dish machine that had damaged floor covering and the cement was exposed. On 1/8/25 at 11:27 AM, a second…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, for 5 out of 39 sampled residents, a residents feeding tube was not capped when not in use, staff did not wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing high contact care for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), staff were not performing hand hygiene between resident care, and the Hoyer lift was not sanitized between resident use. Resident identifiers: 5, 19, 23, 29, and 348. Findings included: 1. Resident 348 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but not limited to, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system, hemiplegia, traumatic subarchnoid hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, gastrostomy status, pressure ulcer of right buttock stage 2, essential…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that this was not possible. Specifically, for 1 out of 39 sampled residents, a resident who had experienced a significant weight loss did not have recommendations from the Registered Dietitian (RD) implemented. Resident identifier: 4. Findings included: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, pneumonia, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DMII), asthma, essential hypertension, major depressive disorder, chronic pain, legal blindness, and adjustment disorder with depressed mood. Resident 4's medical record was reviewed on 1/7/25 through 1/9/25. A care plan Focus initiated on 4/14/21 and revised on 12/26/24, documented [name redacted] has nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem r/t [related to], therapeutic diet. She has DMII, she is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the pharmacist reported irregularities to the attending physician, the facility's Medical Director (MD), and the Director of Nursing (DON) were acted upon. Specifically, for 1 out of 39 sampled residents, a pharmacy recommendation to discontinue hydroxyzine was not acted upon timely. Resident identifier: 17. Findings included: Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, traumatic brain injury, dementia, unsteadiness on feet, foot drop of right foot, adult failure to thrive, sexual dysfunction, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of hip, and insomnia. Resident 17's medical record was reviewed on 1/6/25 through 1/9/25. A review of resident 17's physician orders revealed, hydrOXYzine HCl [hydrochloride] Oral Tablet 25 MG [milligrams] (Hydroxyzine HCl) Give 25 mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for antianxiety. A review of resident 17's Patient Recommendations Summary -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug was any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indication for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicated that the dose should be reduced or discontinued. Specifically, for 1 out of 39 sampled residents, a resident's medication was not discontinued per pharmacy and provider recommendations. Resident identifier: 17. Findings included: Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, traumatic brain injury, protein calorie malnutrition, dementia, unsteadiness on feet, foot drop of right foot, adult failure to thrive, sexual dysfunction, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of hip, and insomnia. Resident 17's medical record was reviewed on 1/6/25 through 1/9/25. A review of resident 17's physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents who used psychotropic drugs received gradual dose reductions (GDR) unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs. A GDR must be attempted in two separate quarters, with at least one month between attempts, within the first year in which an individual was admitted on a psychotropic medication or after the facility had initiated such medication, and then annually. Specifically, for 1 out of 39 sampled residents, a resident taking an anticonvulsant medication for behavioral disturbance had not received a GDR on that medication since 2023, and the medication was not clinically contraindicated. Resident identifier: 24. Findings included: Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, senile degeneration of brain, dementia, essential hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and mood disorder. Resident 24's medical record was reviewed on 1/7/25 through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$68,471 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $68,471 — penalty dated 2025-01-09
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-13 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASCADES HEALTHCARE — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $213K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT