Cascades Of St Anne
3540 Northeast 110th Street, Seattle, WA 98125 · For profit - Corporation · 47 certified beds · (206) 363-7733 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.7% | 14.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.0% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 77.6% | 17.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.3% | 2.6% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.0% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.6% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.8% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 32.3% | 22.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.5% | 15.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.1% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.9% | 82.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.7% | 19.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 0.0% | 13.4% | 12.0% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.19 | 1.33 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.89 | 1.52 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 92 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.5%CMS range 45.0–60.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 8.2–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 76.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 4.3–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 47 beds and averages 36.4 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.36 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.40 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.52 to 0.97 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-12-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for weight loss and dehydration (lack of necessary fluid intake) were free from neglect when services to provide needed nutrition and hydration were not consistently provided. There was a lack of assessment, follow-up when food and fluid intake was significantly low, and involvement of healthcare professionals to address the low intake. This failure caused harm to Resident 1 who had a significant and unplanned weight loss, dehydration, decline in nutritional status and related complications. Findings included . The facility policy titled, Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol, with a revised date of March 2018, showed Neglect means the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Treatment/Management: The facility management and staff will institute measures to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-12-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional service including assessments and interventions to address significant weight loss and lack of intake for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 and 2), reviewed for nutrition/hydration. These failures placed Resident 2 at risk for unmet nutritional needs and caused harm to Resident 1 who had a significant and unplanned weight loss, dehydration (lack of necessary fluid intake), decline in nutritional status, and related complications. Findings included . UNPLANNED SIGNIFICANT WEIGHT LOSS RESIDENT 1 Resident 1 readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a medical nutrition assessment dated [DATE], showed at the time of the assessment the resident weighed 142 pounds (lbs., unit of mass/weight). Supplements were appropriate to maximize intake and meet nutritional needs. Interventions included diet and supplements as ordered, follow-up as needed. The medical nutritional assessment also showed the resident would meet nutritional needs with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-21 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services with the proper qualifications. This failure placed all residents at risk of receiving dietary services from staff without the required competencies and skills to carry out food and nutrition services.Findings included.Review of the key personnel list, provided by the facility on 01/13/2026, showed no staff names were listed under the dietary manager.In an interview on 01/13/2026 at 8:06 AM, Staff G, Cook, stated that they had no dietary manager and that they would report directly to Staff A, Administrator. When asked about the last time they had a dietary manager, Staff G stated, I don't [do not] know. In an interview on 01/16/2026 at 3:52 PM, Staff A stated that the facility did not have a dietary manager or a food services director since 12/05/2025. Staff A stated that they were in contact with the corporate resource person and that they had basically taken the role of a dietary manager. Staff A stated that they had a state food safety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain food safety and services in accordance with professional standards by:1. Not having food items labeled, dated and/or covered for 1 of 1 Kitchen Refrigerator, 2. Not discarding cups of prune juice after their best-by-dates stored in the Steel Kitchen Rack,3. Not monitoring the dishwashing machine temperature,4. Not monitoring the sanitizing solution for the Three-compartment sink,5. Not maintaining the sanitizing solution within the recommended ppm (parts per million - a unit of measurement for concentration) for 1 of 2 sanitizing buckets,6. Not properly disinfecting the food thermometer for 1 of 1 staff (Staff M),7. Not maintaining milk temperature at 41 degrees Fahrenheit at serving time, 8. Not covering food items during meal tray delivery for 2 of 2 staff (Staff T and Staff I ), reviewed for food safety.These failures placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (caused by ingestion of contaminated food or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' environment were maintained for 4 of 15 resident rooms (Rooms 159, 161, 170 & 162) and 1 of 1 therapy gym, reviewed for environment. The failure to ensure resident rooms and therapy gym were maintained, air vents were cleaned, baseboard heater cover were in good repair, and lower door frame and walls were repaired, placed the residents at risk for a less than homelike environment and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.AIR VENTroom [ROOM NUMBER]In an interview on 01/15/2026 at 10:04 AM, Resident 47 stated that they were concerned with the air vent in between the two televisions in their room was filthy. Observation of air vent showed dust towards the back of the vent louvers and dark grey discoloration at the top four vent louvers.BASEBOARD HEATERroom [ROOM NUMBER]Observations on 01/13/2026 at 8:48 AM, on 01/14/2026 at 9:00 AM, and on 01/16/2026 at 8:45 AM, showed the baseboard heater covers in room [ROOM NUMBER] were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 6 of 16 residents (Residents 7, 38, 36, 2, 3 & 19), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool). The failure to ensure resident assessments were completed accurately on the MDS regarding documentation date of gradual dose reduction (GRD-tapering of medication dosage), immunization status and use of anticoagulants (medications used to prevent blood clots) placed the residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life.Findings included. According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.20.1, dated October 2025, showed, .an accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources, some of which are mandated by regulations. Those sources must include the resident and direct care staff on all shifts, and should also include the resident's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the posted daily nurse staffing information included the facility name and the actual hours worked by registered and licensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift for 6 of 6 days (01/13/2026, 01/14/2026, 01/15/2026, 01/16/2026, 01/20/2026 & 01/21/2026), reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. The failure to post a complete and accurate nurse staffing form daily prevented the residents, resident representatives, and visitors from exercising their rights to know the actual nursing staff hours worked in the facility.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, revised in August 2022, showed that the information recorded on the Daily Posting of Nursing Staff form shall include the name of the facility and the actual time worked during that shift.Observations on 01/13/2026 at 2:09 PM, on 01/14/2026 at 12:44 PM, on 01/15/2026 at 2:11 PM, on 01/16/2026 at 3:26 PM, on 01/20/2026 at 2:56 PM and on 01/21/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was less than five percent (%). The failure to properly administer 3 of 28 medications for 4 of 5 residents (Residents 35, 10, 12 & 31), observed during medication administration resulted in a medication error rate of 10.7%. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving the correct form, dose, and/or receiving less than the intended therapeutic effects of physician ordered medications and possible adverse effects.Findings included.RESIDENT 35According to the manufacturer's administration instruction revised in December 2024, Metoprolol succinate (a medication used to treat high blood pressure, chest pain, and heart failure) Extended Release (ER - designed to release active ingredients slowly into the body, rather than all at once) should be taken whole tablet and should not be crushed.Review of Resident 35's January 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed an order, Metoprolol Succinate 25 MG [milligram - unit of measurement] ER . Give 1 tablet by mouth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) policies and procedures were reviewed annually as required. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Transmission Based Precautions (TBP-specialized infection control measures used to prevent the spread of specific infections) were followed by 3 of 5 staff (Staff J, O & V), reviewed for infection control. The failure to change the face mask after exiting a TBP room, use of eye protection (face shield or goggles) before entering a TBP room and perform hand hygiene, placed the residents, visitors, and staff at an increased risk for infection and related complications. Findings included. According to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC-a public health agency) online publication titled, CDC's Core Infection Preventions and Control Practices for Safe Healthcare Delivery in All Settings, dated 04/12/2024 showed that facility shall Provide written infection prevention policies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was evaluated, assessed, and care planned for self-administration of medications for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 23), reviewed for self-administration of medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for medication errors, adverse reactions, and related complications.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, revised in February 2021, showed that the residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do. The policy further stated, If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this is documented in the medical record and the care plan. The decision that a resident can safely self-administer medications is reassessed periodically based on changes in the resident's medical and/or decision-making status.Review of Resident 23's electronic health record (EHR - assessments and progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide information regarding advance directive (a written instruction, such as a living will or Durable Power of Attorney for health care [a document delegating to an agent the authority to make health care decisions in case the individual delegating the authority subsequently becomes incapable to do so]) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3), reviewed for advance directives. This failure placed the resident at risk for losing their right to have their preferences honored to receive or refuse/discontinue care according to their choice.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directives, revised in September 2022, showed that the resident has the right to formulate an advance directive. The policy further showed that upon admission of a resident, the facility would inquire about existence of any written advance directive and that a written information about formulation of an advance directive would be provided to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure report of an incident was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 8), reviewed for accidents. The failure to investigate a fall incident placed the resident at risk for unidentified neglect or mistreatment and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 (sixth edition) showed, A thorough investigation is a systematic collection and review of evidence/information that describes and explains an event or a series of events. It seeks to determine if abuse, neglect, abandonment, personal and/or financial exploitation or misappropriation of resident property occurred, and how to prevent further occurrences.Review of the facility's policy titled, Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting, revised in July 2017, showed, The Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse and/or the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide bed hold and/or transfer notices to the residents and/or their representatives in writing for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 25 & 32), reviewed for hospitalization. These failures placed the residents at risk of not having an opportunity to make an informed decision about their transfers.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed-Hold and Returns, revised in October 2022, showed, All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). The policy further showed, Residents, regardless of payer source, are provided written notice about these policies at least twice: a. notice 1: well in advance of any transfer (e.g., in the admission packet); b. notice 2: at the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours). Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a care plan for 3 of 15 residents (Residents 2, 15 & 36), reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The failure to develop and/or implement care plans for pressure ulcer (bed sore), anticoagulant (blood thinner), diuretics (water pills-medications that make kidneys produce more urine) and dementia (memory loss) placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised in March 2022, showed, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident.The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven (7) days of the completion of the required MDS [Minimum Data Set – an assessment tool] assessment (Admission, Annual or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care conference or care plan meeting was conducted for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 3), reviewed for care planning. This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified and unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised in March 2022, showed, Each resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan is consistent with the resident's rights to participate in the development and implementation of his or her plan of care. The policy further stated, The resident is informed of his or her right to participate in his or her treatment and provided advance notice of care planning conferences. Review of a face sheet printed on 01/14/2026 showed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In an interview on 01/13/2026 at 9:16 AM, Resident 3 stated that they did not remember participating in a care conference/care plan meeting. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 6), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The failure to provide bath/shower for a resident who was dependent on staff for assistance placed the resident at risk for poor hygiene, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, revised in March 2018, showed, Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.Review the admission record printed on 01/20/2026 showed that Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included generalized muscle weakness.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 12/23/2025 showed Resident 6 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Oxygen Storage Room door electronic keypad lock was functioning for 1 of 1 oxygen storage room, reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed residents at risk of accidents, injuries and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Observations on 01/13/2026 at 2:58 PM, on 01/14/2026 at 8:29 AM, on 01/16/2026 at 3:51 PM, and on 01/20/2026 at 8:43 AM, showed the door to the oxygen storage room to be unlocked and accessible without inputting the code into the electronic keypad lock.In an interview and joint observation on 01/20/2026 at 9:42 AM, Staff W, Certified Nursing Assistant, stated that the doors with the electronic keypad locks were locked so the residents did not have access to those rooms and to prevent them from getting hurt. A joint observation of the oxygen storage room showed the door was unlocked and accessible without inputting the code into the electronic keypad lock. Staff W stated the door should have been locked due to residents could get hurt from the oxygen tanks.In an interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure enteral nutrition (the delivery of nutrients through a tube feeding [TF - a method of delivering liquid nutrients, fluids, and medication directly into the stomach or small intestine through a flexible tube]) was administered in accordance with physician's orders and professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2), reviewed for TF. The failure to follow the physician's orders on the amount of formula to administer, document the amount of formula and water flush administered, and label, with date, and time TF formula bottle and water flush bag placed the resident at risk for unmet nutrition need, adverse health outcomes, and related complications.Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Enteral Nutrition, revised in November 2018, showed, Adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition is provided to residents as ordered.Review of the admission record printed on 01/15/2026 showed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store the Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP - a therapy that pumps air into the lungs through the nose or nose and mouth that keeps the airway open) mask when not in use and have a proper physician order in place for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 19), reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, respiratory infections, and related complications.Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, CPAP/BiPAP [Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure - breathing support device that delivers two pressure levels] Support, revised in March 2015, directed staff to document the CPAP settings in the resident's medical record.Review of the admission record printed on 01/20/2026 showed Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included obstructive sleep apnea (a sleep disorder that is marked by pauses in breathing of 10 seconds or more during sleep and causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store biologicals (diverse group of medicines made from natural sources) in accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and accepted professional standards for 1 of 1 medication refrigerator (Medication Room Refrigerator), reviewed for medication storage. In addition, the facility failed to properly store drugs for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 23). These failures placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised and ineffective medications/biological and medication errors.Finding included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, revised in February 2023, showed, The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature, humidity and light controls. Only authorized personnel have access to keys. MEDICATION ROOM REFRIGERATORAccording to the CDC's guideline titled, Vaccine Storage and Handling, dated 03/19/2024, showed, Keep your storage units and vaccines within the appropriate temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff that were adequately trained to properly perform kitchen sanitization practices (sanitizing buckets) and safely carry out functions of meal preparation (use of food thermometer) for 2 of 4 dietary staff (Staff L & Staff M), reviewed for food safety. These failures placed the residents at risk for food-borne illnesses (caused by ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the Washington State Retail Food Code dated 03/01/2022, showed, Employees are properly sanitizing.multiuse equipment and utensils before they are reused, through routine monitoring.including the application of sanitizing chemicals by manual swabbing.Contact times must be consistent with those on EPA [Environmental Protection Agency-United States agency safeguarding human health and protecting the environment]-registered label use instructions. The policy further showed, Concentration of the sanitizing solution must be accurately determined by using a test…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pneumococcal vaccine (used to prevent pneumonia [a lung infection]) were up to date and offered to 2 of 5 residents (Residents 2 & 36), reviewed for pneumococcal immunizations. This failure placed the residents at risk for acquiring, transmitting, and/or experiencing potentially avoidable complications from pneumococcal disease.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised in March 2022, showed, All residents are offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. Prior to or upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series and when indicated, are offered the vaccine series within thirty (30) days of admission to the facility.The policy further showed that Administration of the pneumococcal vaccines is made in accordance with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations. According to CDC's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation about COVID-19 (a viral illness that causes fever, difficulty breathing or possibly death) vaccination status for 1 of 1 staff (Staff H), reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations. This failure placed staff and residents at risk of exposure to illness from COVID-19.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)-Vaccination of Staff, revised in May 2023, showed that staff would provide documentation of their vaccination and that the infection preventionist maintains a tracking worksheet of staff members and their vaccination status. The policy further showed that the facility would maintain documentation related to staff COVID-19 vaccination status. Review of the facility's staff list showed Staff H, Certified Nursing Assistant, was hired on 11/03/2025. In an interview on 01/16/2026 at 9:27 AM, Staff H stated that they received their COVID-19 vaccination in another state. Staff H further stated that they provided a copy of their vaccination status to the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the care plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for accident hazards. The failure to follow two-person assistance when providing toileting care and repositioning placed the resident at risk for further falls, injury, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, revised on March 2018, showed, appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care. Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paraplegia (loss of muscle function in the lower half of the body) and Multiple Sclerosis (a disease of the brain and spine that can cause balance issues and muscle spasms).Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 11/03/2025, showed Resident 1 had intact cognition.Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate non-pharmacological interventions for pain management prior to the administration of pain medication for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for pain management. In addition, the facility failed to adequately monitor adverse side effects of pain medication for Resident 1. These failures placed the resident at risk for unnecessary medications, incomplete pain control and unrecognized adverse side effects. Findings included . Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (a required assessment) dated 02/14/2025 showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included a fracture [break] in the lower back with lower back pain. Review of the February 2025 and March 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Resident 1 had physician orders dated 02/08/2025 for Methocarbamol (medication used to relieve pain) 500 milligrams (mg-a unit of measurement) every six hours as needed and was administered the medication on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring was conducted for use of antipsychotic (medication used to treat mental disorders) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications, unrecognized adverse side effects, and related complications. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (a required assessment) dated 02/14/2025 showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included a delirium (a sudden change in a person's mental state, often characterized by confusion, disorientation, and difficulty thinking clearly). Review of the February 2025 and March 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed a physician order dated 02/08/2025 for Quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication used to treat mental disorder) 25 milligrams (mg-a unit of measurement) one tablet at bedtime and another physician order dated 02/11/2025 for Quetiapine 25 mg one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed use of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE - use of gown, gloves, respirator/N95 mask and face shield/goggles) in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control guidelines when caring for residents with known COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory disease) infection for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 2), reviewed for infection control. This failure placed the residents, staff, and visitors at risk for COVID-19 infection and related complications. Findings included . Record review of a progress note dated 03/28/2025 showed Resident 2 tested positive for COVID-19 on 03/28/2025. Observation on 03/31/2025 at 1:01 PM, showed signage that Resident 2 was on aerosol precautions (a type of isolation used for infections spread through the air) and contact precautions (a set of safety measures used to prevent the spread of infectious diseases through direct or indirect contact with a resident or their environment). The sign showed that everyone must use a respirator/N95 mask, wear eye protection, gown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary supervision for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for elopement. The failure to provide the necessary supervision for Resident 1 resulted in an elopement and placed the resident at risk for injury. Findings included . Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a required assessment) dated 08/15/2024 showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included dementia (impaired memory). The MDS assessment also showed the resident required assistance for all care and used a wheelchair for mobility. Review of the facility's investigative report dated 11/11/2024 showed that on 11/11/2024 at approximately 5:15 PM, Resident 1 was unable to be found in the facility. The investigative report documented that the facility staff initiated a facility search inside and outside of the facility. A facility staff member walked around the neighborhood of the facility and staff did not find the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-04 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure survey results were posted in a place readily accessible to residents and residents' legal representatives. This failure prevented residents, residents' representatives and visitors from exercising their right to review past survey results and the facility's plan of correction. Findings included . Observations on 10/28/2024 at 10:00 AM, on 10/29/2024 at 9:41 AM, and on 0/30/2024 at 9:56 AM, the facility lobby did not show a survey binder was readily available and accessible to all residents and their residents' legal representatives. In an interview on 10/31/2024 at 3:34 PM, Resident 11 stated that they would have to ask the business office to see the survey results. Resident 11 stated that they had not seen a survey binder book in the lobby. In an interview and joint observation on 11/04/2024 at 5:26 PM, Staff A, Administrator, stated that they kept the survey binder right by the opening of the business office window at the lobby. Staff A stated that the book was not out because they had the book in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-04 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 5 of 16 residents (Residents 9, 17, 3, 31 & 4), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool). The failure to ensure accurate assessments regarding use of antibiotic (medication to inhibit growth of bacteria), use of insulin (medication/hormone that regulates blood sugar levels) injections, use of anticoagulant (medication to prevent blood clot), use of intrathecal pump (administration of medication through an injection into the spinal canal), use of diuretic (medication to increase urination), and tube feeding (a medical device used to provide nutrients through a tube directly into the stomach) placed the residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, showed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain, label/date, and properly store oxygen tubing/supplies and nasal cannula (flexible tubing that sits inside the nose and delivers oxygen) for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 9, 22, 32 & 28), reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, respiratory infections, and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Use, revised in October 2024, showed, It is the policy of this facility to promote resident safety in administering oxygen. The policy further showed that oxygen cannula or mask should be changed per orders or when visibly soiled, oxygen equipment should be cleaned regularly, and routine oxygen equipment inspection and maintenance should be performed based on manufacturer's recommendations. RESIDENT 9 Resident 9 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included heart failure (affects the heart's ability to pump blood to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-04 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing form was placed in a prominent place accessible to residents, residents' representatives and visitors. This failure placed the residents, their representatives and visitors at risk of not being fully informed of the current staffing levels. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, revised in November 2024, showed that within two (2) hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed nurses (Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, and Licensed Vocational Nurses) and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel (Certified Nursing Assistants and Nursing Assistants) directly responsible for resident care is posted in a prominent location (accessible to residents and visitors) and in a clear and readable format. Observations on 10/28/2024 at 11:18 AM and on 10/29/2024 at 10:52 AM, showed a daily nurse staffing form was posted along with other facility notices in the south area of the facility that was not visible, Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately label and store drugs or biologicals (diverse group of medicines made from natural sources) for 1 of 1 Medication Storage Room and 1 of 2 medication carts (South Medication Cart), reviewed for medication storage and labeling. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the Medication Storage Room was free of expired medical supplies and tube feeding (TF-the delivery of nutrients through a tube directly into the stomach to provide nutrition) formulas. These failures placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised and ineffective medications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, revised in [DATE], showed, multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g., needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to periodically test the sanitizing solution/agent used to ensure proper sanitation of food preparation surfaces in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen and failed to consistently monitor and document refrigerator temperatures for 1 of 5 refrigerators (Snack Refrigerator), reviewed for food services. In addition, the facility failed to properly label, date, and/or discard nutritional supplements in the Food Refrigerator in the Medication Storage Room. These failures placed the residents at risk for food borne illness [caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages] and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Sanitization, revised in November 2024, showed that the food service area was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. That kitchen areas and dining areas were kept clear, free from garbage and debris, protected from rodents and insects. The policy further showed that when cleaning fixed equipment-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a comprehensive water management program that assessed, measured, and/or monitored potential risk for exposure to Legionnaire's disease (or Legionella - a potentially dangerous bacteria that grows in water, which could cause a serious lung infection) or other waterborne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganisms that can cause a disease). In addition, the facility failed to ensure to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs - germs that are resistant to medications that treat infections] in nursing homes) during hygiene care and tube feeding (a medical device used to provide nutrients through a tube directly into the stomach) manipulation for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 4), and failed to sanitize the transfer lift equipment for 2 of 2 staff (Staff J and K), reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was maintained to keep the facility free of houseflies for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 29, 93 & 5), for 1 of 1 dining room, and for 1 of 1 kitchen, reviewed for dining and kitchen. This failure placed the residents at risk for infection, maggot infestation (small, worm like bugs that hatch from fly eggs), and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Pest Control, revised in October 2024, showed that the facility would maintain an effective pest control program and that the facility would have a pest control contract that provided treatment of the environment for pests. RESIDENT ROOMS/RESIDENTS RESIDENT 29 Observation on 10/28/2024 at 9:47 AM, showed a fly on Resident 29's bedside table. Resident 29 shooed the fly away and the fly moved to Resident 29's bed. Resident 29 stated I don't know where the fly came from. RESIDENT 93 On 10/28/2024 at 9:49 AM, Resident 93 stated that they had seen flies around in their room, a big fly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike dining experience was provided for 1 of 8 residents (Resident 94), reviewed for dignity/privacy during dining. This failure placed the resident at risk for dignity issues and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised in April 2019, showed that medications were administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The policy further showed that medication administration times were determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convenience. Observation on 10/29/2024 at 8:52 AM, showed Staff N, Registered Nurse, giving Resident 94 their oral medications in the main dining room during the breakfast meal. Staff N was observed telling Resident 94 what medications they were taking and what they were for in front of seven other residents in the dining room. On 10/29/2024 at 4:08 PM, Staff N, stated that they gave Resident 94 their five oral medications in the dining room and that they should not have. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegation of abuse and/or neglect were thoroughly investigated for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 3 & 31), reviewed for abuse investigations. This failure placed the residents at risk for repeated incidents, unidentified abuse, and inappropriate corrective actions. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse/Neglect Prevention Program Policy, dated April 2021, showed that residents had the right to be free from abuse/neglect, including freedom from physical abuse. The policy further showed that the facility would identify and investigate allegations of abuse, report any allegations within time frames required by the Federal Government, and protect residents from further harm during investigations. According to the Washington State Reporting Guidelines for Nursing Homes (The Purple Book), dated October 2015, All alleged incidents of abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, injuries of unknown source, personal and/or financial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written transfer/discharge notice to the resident and/or their representative for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 28), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk for not having an opportunity to make informed decisions about transfers/discharges. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer or Discharge Notice, revised in October 2024, showed, Emergency Transfers: When a resident is temporarily transferred on an emergency basis to an acute care facility, notice of the transfer may be provided to the resident and resident representative as soon practicable. A review of the nursing progress notes showed Resident 28 discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Another review of the nursing progress notes showed Resident 28 readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the electronic health record did not show documentation that Resident 28 was offered and/or provided a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed hold (the opportunity to reserve a resident's current occupied bed while out of the facility to ensure their room was available when ready to return) notice was offered for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 28), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident or their representative at risk for lack of knowledge regarding the right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Holds and Returns, revised in November 2024, showed Residents and/or representatives are informed (in writing) of the facility and state (if applicable) bed-hold policies. 1. All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents, regardless of payer source, are provided written notice about these policies at least…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR-an assessment to ensure individuals with Serious Mental Illness [SMI] or Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities [ID/DD] are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) Level I was completed for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 17), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for not receiving the care and services appropriate for their needs. Findings included . Review of the Department of Social and Health Services, Dear Nursing Home Administrator Letter, guidance titled Clarification to the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR OR PASRR) Level I Screening Process, dated 07/06/2024 and amended on 08/23/2024, showed a positive Level I PASARR screen (that would then require a referral for a Level II PASARR) was if Any of the questions in Section 1A (1, 2, and/or 3) are marked Yes. Review of the facility's policy titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for 2 of 16 residents (Residents 31 & 17), reviewed for comprehensive care plan. The failure to develop care plans for diuretic (reduce swelling/fluid buildup in the body) medications placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised in November 2024, showed, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident . The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven (7) days of the completion of the required MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance were consistently provided for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 34 & 26), reviewed for ADLs. The failure to provide residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with showers/bathing placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, decreased self-esteem, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, revised in October 2024, showed that appropriate care and services were provided for residents who were unable to carry out ADL independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene, bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care. RESIDENT 34 On 10/28/2024 at 3:43 PM, Resident 34 stated they wanted to have more showers than once a week and that they have talked to facility staff numerous times that they have not gotten an answer. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure diabetic [diabetes - a disease that occurs when blood sugar level is too high] nail care was provided for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 34), reviewed for quality of care. In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents on diuretic (that helps with edema [swelling] to reduce fluid buildup in the body) and/or anticoagulant medications (that stops blood from clotting too easily to help stop life-threatening conditions) were monitored for adverse side effects for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 31 & 32), reviewed for unnecessary medications. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Therapy, revised in November 2024, showed Each resident's medication regimen shall include only those medications necessary to treat existing conditions and address significant risks . Medication use shall be consistent with an individual's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of antibiotic (medication to treat infection) side effects and use of antibiotic use had an appropriate diagnosis for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 22), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for receiving unnecessary medication and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship, revised in December 2016, showed that the purpose of the antibiotic stewardship program was to monitor the use of antibiotic in their residents. The policy showed that training and education would include how inappropriate use of antibiotics affects individual residents. The training would include emphasis on the relationship between antibiotic use and gastrointestinal disorders, opportunistic infections, medication interactions, and the evolution of drug-resistant pathogens. The policy further showed that the prescriber would provide complete antibiotic orders including the following elements: drug name, dose, frequency of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently maintain an established Antibiotic (medications to treat infection) Stewardship Program to promote the appropriate use of antibiotics for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 26), and failed to ensure standardized tools and criteria were utilized for Antibiotic Stewardship Program (such as Loeb Minimum Criteria [minimum set of signs/ symptoms used to determine whether to treat an infection with antibiotic resistance). These failures placed the residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate and/or unnecessary use of antibiotics. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship, revised in December 2016, showed the stewardship program's purpose was to monitor the use of antibiotics for residents. Review of the facility's policy titled, Staff and Clinician Training and Roles, revised in December 2016, showed that the Director of Nursing (DON) and Infection Preventionist (IP) will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccine (used to prevent pneumonia [a lung infection]) and the COVID-19 vaccine (used to prevent an infectious disease caused by coronavirus) were provided for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 9), reviewed for immunizations. This failure placed the resident at risk of acquiring, transmitting, and/or experiencing potentially avoidable complications from pneumococcal and/or COVID-19. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Vaccination of Residents, revised in May 2023, showed all residents would be offered vaccines. The policy showed that prior to receiving vaccination, the resident or legal representative will be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccination. It further showed that if the vaccines were refused, then than it shall be documented in the resident's medical record. Review of the face sheet showed Resident 9 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct routine maintenance to ensure side rails were safe to use for 3 of 4 Residents (Residents 32, 5 & 25), reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed the residents at risk for injury and/or entrapment. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Safety and Bed Rails, revised in November 2024, showed that consideration is given to the resident's safety. The policy showed that the bed rail and mattress will leave no gap wide enough to entrap a resident's head or body. The policy further stated that maintenance staff would routinely inspect all beds and related equipment to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks. The maintenance department would then provide a copy of inspections to the administrator. RESIDENT 32 Joint observation and interview on 11/04/2024 at 8:47 AM with Staff M, Registered Nurse, showed Resident 32's left half bed rail was loose and moved side to side for six to eight inches. Staff M stated that Resident 32's left bed rail felt loose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency and failed to initiate timely investigation for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse reporting. These failures placed the residents at risk for abuse, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings Included . Review of the Abuse/Neglect Prevention Program Policy, dated April 2021, showed residents have the right to be free from abuse/neglect, this includes but is not limited to freedom from physical abuse. (8) Identify and investigate allegations of abuse. (9) Report any allegations within time frames required by the Federal Government. (10) Protect residents from further harm during investigations. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS- an assessment tool) dated 09/02/2024, showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had impaired thinking and required assist with care and mobility. Review of a facility reported incident to the State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed use of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE - use of gown, gloves, respirator/N95 and face shield/goggles) in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control guidelines when caring for residents with known COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory disease) infection for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for infection control. This failure placed the residents, staff, and visitors at risk for COVID-19 infection and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Identification and Management of Ill Residents, revised in May 2023, showed staff who enter the room of a resident with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection would adhere to standard precautions and use a respirator such as an N95 or higher, gown, gloves, and eye protection (goggles or a face shield). Review of a nursing progress notes dated 09/08/2024, showed Resident 1's presented with COVID-19 symptoms that day and was placed on isolation precaution.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely treatment of pressure injuries/pressure ulcers (wounds that occur due to prolonged pressure on the skin) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for pressure ulcers. The failure to provide timely treatments for pressure ulcers placed the resident at risk of further decrease in skin integrity, wound infection, and related complications. Findings Included . Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 04/08/2024, showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of hemiplegia (weakness or inability to move one side of the body) after a stroke. The MDS also showed Resident 1 required assistance with mobility and was at risk for pressure ulcers. Review of the admission screen form dated 04/02/2024, showed Resident 1 had redness to toes. On 05/23/2024 at 1:56 PM, Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN), stated they completed the admission screen for Resident 1 on 04/02/2024, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge process were implemented for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 1, 2 & 3), reviewed for discharge planning. The failure to ensure residents who discharged against medical advice (AMA) were provided risks and benefits prior to leaving the facility placed the residents at increased risk for hospital readmission, injury, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Discharging A Resident without a Physician's Approval, revised in October 2022, showed that should a resident, or their representative request an immediate discharge, the resident's attending physician is promptly notified. If the resident and/or their representative requests discharge without the approval of the attending physician, the resident and/or their representative will be asked to sign a release of responsibility form. Should either party refuse to sign the release, such refusal must be documented in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident representative when there was a change in medications for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for notification of change. This failure prevented the resident's representative of not having information to make informed decisions or be involved in the resident's health care decisions. Findings included . Resident 1 readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) dated 10/09/2023, showed Resident 1 had severely impaired skills for decision making. The MDS also showed Resident 1 had an active diagnosis of a seizure disorder (epilepsy, uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells that cause abnormalities in muscle tone [stiffness, twitching or limpness], behaviors or states of awareness). Review of a physician order dated 09/29/2023, showed the resident had an order for Valproate Sodium (or Depakote, medication used to treat seizures) 15 milliliters (ml, unit of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to inspect food items for quality upon receipt and ensure their proper storage. In addition, the facility failed to keep track of when to discard perishable foods, and failed to ensure foods stored in the freezers and refrigerators were covered, labeled, and dated. These failures placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, revised in July 2014 read in pertinent part, Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Dry food that are stored in bins will be removed from original packaging, labeled, and dated (use by date). Such foods will be rotated using a first in - first out system. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled, and dated (use by date). FREEZER ONE On 07/25/2023 at 9:05 AM, during a joint observation of the kitchen with Staff D, Dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene practices were followed during medication administrations for 3 of 7 residents (Residents 4, 11, & 27) observed for infection control. Additionally, the facility failed to have a water management program that assessed, measured, and/or monitored the growth of Legionella (a water-borne bacteria that can cause pneumonia [a lung infection]) or other waterborne pathogens (an organism that can cause disease). These failures placed the residents at risk for facility acquired or healthcare-associated infections and related complications. Findings included . HAND HYGIENE Review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, revised in August 2019, showed the facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infection. It also stated that the facility was to use either alcohol-based hand rub or soap and water for the following situations: before and after direct contact with resident, and before preparing or handling medications. On 07/28/2023 at 7:47 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately label and store drugs and/or biologicals for 1 of 1 medication storage room, and 1 of 2 medication carts (Southwest Cart), reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised, incorrect, and/or ineffective medications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, revised in January 2018, showed that, outdated .medications .are immediately removed from inventory. Additionally, it showed that, when the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated .the nurse shall place a 'date opened' sticker on the medication and enter the date opened. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised in April 2019, showed that, Insulin (medication for diabetes [a condition in which the body had high blood sugar levels for prolonged periods of time]) pens are clearly labeled with the resident's name or other identifying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective resident centered discharge plan was in place for 1 of 12 residents (Resident 24), reviewed for discharge planning. The failure to initiate a discharge plan consistent with the resident's needs and/or the resident representative's expressed discharge goals, placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, decreased self-worth, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of Resident 24's electronic medical record showed, diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis) affecting right dominant side, aphasia (speech difficulty), retention of urine, and vascular dementia (memory loss). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 06/07/2023, showed Resident 24 required extensive assistance of one or two people to complete all activities of daily living such as transferring, bed mobility, dressing, eating and personal hygiene. Review of Resident 24's care plan, dated 06/06/2023, showed, there are no plans to discharge at this time. Review of the progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-09 for 30 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-20 for 1 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CASCADES HEALTHCARE — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FURUMA FLP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 23% | since 10/01/2024 |
| LIBERTY RAE FLP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 23% | since 10/01/2024 |
| NORDMARK FLP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 23% | since 10/01/2024 |
| QUEST FLP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 10/01/2024 |
| SUNBURST GROVE FLP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 23% | since 10/01/2024 |
| MOORE, THOMAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 10/01/2024 |
| THORNTON CREEK HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| MCSPADDEN, DARIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| CRUMP, JASON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| FULLMER, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| WHITE, DEREK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| LY, YAYA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| RASKIND, DANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $140K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505417. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.