Sandy Health and Rehab
50 East 9000 South, Sandy, UT 84070 · For profit - Corporation · 141 certified beds · (801) 561-9839 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (74) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $22,562 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-15)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.0% | 11.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 3.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.9% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.7% | 1.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 27.1% | 16.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.4% | 15.1% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.4% | 25.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 3.9% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.4% | 21.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.1% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 0.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.0% | 91.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 12.8% | 16.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.9% | 11.6% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.51 | 1.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.18 | 1.43 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 18.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.0%CMS range 45.8–68.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.8%CMS range 5.4–12.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 18.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 22.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 141 beds and averages 99.1 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
74 citations, most serious first. The 23 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, there were 2 freezers in the kitchen that did not maintain appropriate temperatures to keep food items frozen. These findings resulted in immediate jeopardy. NOTICE: Notice of the Immediate Jeopardy was given verbally to the Administrator (Admin 2), Administrator (Admin 1), and a the Director of Leadership Development (DLD) on 7/30/23 at 12:56 PM. At that time, Admin 1, Admin 2 and the DLD were informed of the findings of Immediate Jeopardy pertaining to F812 and were asked to develop an immediate plan to ensure that the residents of the facility were free from food that had not been stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety . On 7/30/23 at 11:59 PM, Admin 2 provided the following written allegation of removal of the Immediate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible; and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, for 2 out of 28 sampled residents, one resident eloped from the facility and sustained 2nd and 3rd degree burns. Additionally, another resident was found outside the facility doors while wearing a wander guard. Resident Identifiers: 10 and 26. Findings Included: 1. Resident 26 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of left side hemiplegia, epilepsy, bipolar type schizoaffective disorder, cognitive communication deficit, burn of second degree of lower back, burn of second degree of buttock, burn of third degree of lower back, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. On 8/13/24 at 2:40 pm, an interview was conducted with resident 26. Resident 26 stated they had snuck out of the facility and had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2023-08-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 5 of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure each resident was free from verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse. Specifically, a resident was forced to do Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), a male resident did not have the mental capacity to consent prior to moving in with a female resident, a resident was transferred inappropriately resulting in a femur fracture, and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was allowed to work with a specific resident after the CNA caused the resident to fall. This resulted in a finding of HARM for 3 residents. Resident identifiers: 16, 20, 22, 44 and 78. Findings include: HARM 1. Resident 22 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Multiple Sclerosis (MS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, muscle weakness, dementia, anemia, hypertension and age related osteoporosis without pathological fracture. Resident 22's medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 7. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia, weakness, and repeated falls. Resident 35's medical record was reviewed from 7/30/23 through 8/16/23. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented, resident 35 required a one person extensive assistance for transfers including to or from: bed, chair, wheelchair, standing position. A care plan dated 2/13/23, a focus care area documented Resident is at risk for falls r/t (related to) impaired mobility, altered ADL (activities of daily living) ability, advanced age, EOL (end of life) process. A goal developed was Resident shall be free from injury daily. Interventions: a. 2/13/23 Assist with ADL's PRN (as needed). Evaluate physical abilities at least qtrly(quarterly), fall risk assess upon admission and qtrly and prn. Provide cueing/supervision prn, anticipate needs, frequent visual checks, provide safe environment, all light within reach, use safety devices as ordered/prn. b. 7/13/23 Neuro checks as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2023-08-16 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and observation, multiple system failures were identified during the survey, and the facility was found to be in non-compliance at a harm level with F600, F644, F679, F686, F689, F692, F726, F742; and F812 at an Immediately Jeopardy level, indicating substandard quality of care. Resident identifiers: 16, 18, 20, 22, 35, 39, 40, 44, 49, 50, 51, 54, 62, 65, 78, 88, 156, and 158. Findings include: 1. Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 5 of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure each resident was free from verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse. Specifically, a resident was forced to do Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), a male resident did not have the mental capacity to consent prior to moving in with a female resident, a resident was transferred inappropriately resulting in a femur fracture, and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was allowed to work with a specific resident after the CNA caused the resident to fall. This resulted in a finding of HARM for 3 residents. Resident identifiers: 16, 20, 22, 44…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2023-08-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies; and regularly review and analyze data, including data collected under the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) program, and act on available data to make improvements. Specifically, deficient practices identified during the survey included repeat deficiencies in the areas of prevention of accident hazards, develop and or implement comprehensive care plans, provide activities of daily living (ADLs) care for dependent residents, maintenance of nutrition, label and store drugs and biologicals, maintaining identifiable information in the resident records, infection prevention, and Food storage. Resident identifiers: 16, 18, 20, 22, 35, 39, 40, 44, 49, 50, 51, 54, 62, 65, 78, 88, 156, and 158. Findings include: 1. Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 5 of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure each resident was free from verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-16 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 68 sampled residents, the facility did not incorporate the recommendations from the Pre-admission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) Level II into the resident's assessment, care planning and transitions of care. Specifically, a PASRR Level II evaluation identified that a resident needed mental health services and the facility did not arrange for those services. The findings for this deficiency were determined to have occurred at a harm level. Resident identifier: 62. Findings include: Resident 62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, insomnia and depression. On 7/30/23 at 12:00 PM an interview was conducted with Resident 62. Resident 62 stated that she spends most of her time in her bed and that it is hard for her to get around. She stated that she eats all meals in bed and will watch TV or purchase things on amazon for her activities.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, 6 out of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide an ongoing program to support resident in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community based on the residents comprehensive assessment and care plan. Specifically, residents complained about not having activities, observations were made of less than 10 residents per activity, and one on one activities were not being provided. The findings for one resident were determined to have occurred at a harm level. Resident identifiers: 16, 20, 49, 51, 54 and 62. Findings include: HARM 1. Resident 62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that for 2 of 68 sample residents without pressure ulcers did not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services. Specifically, a resident developed a pressure ulcer during his stay, and did not receive timely skin checks or wound treatments. The findings for this resident were determined to have occurred at a harm level. In addition, a resident was not repositioned appropriately. Resident identifiers: 65 and 158. Findings include: HARM 1. Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included, spiral fracture of the left femur, type 2 diabetes, muscle weakness, and arthritis. On 7/30/23 at 8:57 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 65. Resident 65 stated that he came to the facility because he broke his femur and was now bed ridden but participated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility did not ensure that 4 of 68 sampled residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status. Specifically, residents experienced weight loss and pressure sores without timely and appropriate interventions. This will be cited at a harm level for resident 65. In addition, residents were not provided interventions to prevent weight loss further weight loss. Resident identifiers: 16, 44, 65 and 88. Findings include: HARM 1. Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included, spiral fracture of the left femur, type 2 diabetes, muscle weakness, and arthritis. On 7/30/23 at 8:57 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 65. Resident 65 stated that he came to the facility because he broke his femur and was now bed ridden but participated in physical therapy. Resident 65 stated that he had developed sores on his heels during the beginning of his stay at the facility. Resident 65 stated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined for 2 of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility must ensure that nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs. Specifically, facility staff transferred a resident who required a two person physical assist resulting in a femur fracture. Also, a resident who sustained a fall was not assessed by the nurse or monitored after the fall. The findings for resident 22 were determined to have occurred at a harm level. Resident identifier: 18 and 22. Findings included: HARM 1. Resident 22 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Multiple Sclerosis (MS),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-16 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident who displayed or was diagnosed with a mental disorder or a psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who had a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder, received appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practical mental and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, a resident with suicidal ideation and a Pre-admission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) Level II evaluation identified that a resident needed mental health services and the facility did not arrange for those services. The findings for resident 62 were found to have occurred at a harm level. Resident identifier: 62. Findings include: HARM Resident 62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorder, insomnia and depression. On 7/30/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-10-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, for 1 out of 49 sampled residents, a resident that had multiple falls with injuries was not provided interventions or adequate supervision to prevent falls from occurring. In addition, the resident had a fall that resulted in a major injury and the resident was hospitalized . Resident identifier: 54. Findings included: Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but not limited to fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease stage 4, gastroparesis, repeated falls, essential hypertension, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, difficulty in walking, acquired absence of other left toe(s), pain in left foot, acquired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 41 sample residents, that the facility did not provide the residents with the right to manage his or her financial affairs. Specifically, residents who had authorized the facility to manage any personal funds did not have ready and reasonable access to those funds. Resident identifiers: 30 and 295. Findings include: On 4/13/25 at 11:12 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 30. Resident 30 stated she could not get her money unless it was a weekday because no one was available who had access to the money, on the weekends. Resident 30 stated she was told she would just have to wait until Monday to get her money. On 4/16/25 at 11:00 AM the facility grievance binder was reviewed. A grievance form from resident 295 dated 6/4/24 documented. No one to give money out on the weekend. Business office states there is no money to give out on weekends. The response to the grievance was documented as, We spoke about collecting money on Fridays if she needs it. The follow-up action was documented on the form as, [Resident 295]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and observation, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, the shower rooms were in disrepair and one shower room was malodorous. Resident identifier: 37, 46 and 89. Findings include: On 4/13/25 at 2:41 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 46. Resident 46 stated that the 100-hall shower room constantly smelled like soiled diapers and that it was so bad she refused to use that shower. On 4/15/25 at 9:11 AM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4. CNA 4 stated resident 46 refused to go in the 100-hall shower room because it had a smell. CNA 4 stated the 100-hall shower room smelled like smoke or sewer maybe. On 4/16/25 at 8:53 AM, an observation was made of the south 300 hallway shower room. The tile on the base of divider wall was observed to be missing and broken. On 4/16/25 at 2:52 PM, an interview was conducted in the 200-hall shower room with the Maintenance Director. The Maintenance Director stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide food that was palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, for 14 out of 41 sample residents, salad was not kept at the correct temperature while serving tray line, residents complained of food quality, a test tray not attractive or palatable and resident council minutes and grievance forms revealed complaints of food quality. Resident identifiers: 2, 7, 18, 21, 30, 33, 46, 49, 60, 66, 89, 70, 73, and 145. Findings include: On 4/13/25 at 11:23 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 30. Resident 30 stated the food is not very good. Resident 30 stated that the food is awful and cold, but people eat it because that is all that they have when you can't get anything else. On 4/13/25 at 11:45 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 21 who stated the food was usually cold and just all around not good. On 4/13/25 at 10:11 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 33. Resident 33 stated that the food was okay, but did not have much flavor or look appealing.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the food was not served in a sanitary manner. Findings include: On 4/15/25 during the tray line of lunch service the following was observed: a. At 12:13 PM, Dietary Aide (DA) 1 was observed to Donn gloves. DA 1 was then observed to touch the thermometer, sink, refrigerator handle, and was then observed to touch the face of the plates with the same gloved right hand. [NAME] (CK) 1 was observed to place food on the plate that DA1 touched with the dirty glove. b. At 12:12 PM, CK 1 was observed to have gloves on and touch the oven doors, sink handles, the spatula handle and then touch the face of the plates prior to plating the food for the residents. c. At 12:18 PM, CK 1 was observed to slide the plates across the white cutting board in front of the tray line. CK 1 was then observed to take a scoopful of carrots and place them on the cutting board. CK 1 chopped the carrots on the cutting board…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident was offered the influenza, pneumococcal, and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. In addition, residents that accepted the vaccines did not have those vaccines administered. Specifically, for 3 out of 5 sample residents, two residents had signed consent forms where they had accepted to receive the 2024/2025 COVID-19 booster, and the booster was not administered. In addition, one resident did not have documentation that they were offered vaccines for the 2024/2025 season. Resident identifiers: 4, 28, and 55. Findings included: 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, epilepsy. Resident 4's medical record was reviewed on 4/16/25. A form titled 2024-2025 Seasonal Vaccination Consent was reviewed. Resident 4 marked on the form that they wished to receive the 2024-2025 COVID-19 booster. Administration documentation for the COVID-19 booster was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 41 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choice. Specifically, a resident had a delay in getting sutures removed. Resident identifier: 55 Findings included: Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, generalized anxiety disorder, other lack of coordination, and major depressive disorder. On 4/13/25 at 10:06 AM, an observation and interview were made of resident 55. Resident 55's left leg was in a brace, there were sutures on the bridge of her nose that appeared to have scabs over them, and her left cheek had a greenish-purple discoloration. Resident 55 stated she had fallen down and broken her knee and hit her face. On 4/15/25 at 9:23 AM, an observation was made of resident 55 sitting in her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0775 — isolatedKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined. for 1 out of 41 sample residents, that the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record laboratory reports that were dated and contained the name and address of the testing laboratory. Specifically, a resident's laboratory results were not located in the electronic medical records. Resident identifier: 6 Findings included: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included benign neoplasm of brain, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and epilepsy. On 1/20/25 a pharmacy recommendation for resident 6 documented, This resident takes Phenytoin 300 TID [three times a day] and Phenobarbital 97.2 QD [every day], and a review of the chart could not find any serum levels in the last six months, and there are no routine orders in place for this lab to be drawn. The following intervention has been preapproved by the attending medical team…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0779 — isolatedKeep signed and dated reports of x-rays and other diagnostic services in the residents record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record signed and dated reports of radiological services. Specifically, for 1 out of 41 sample residents, a resident's x-ray report was not located in the medical record. Resident identifier: 40 Findings included: Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, transient cerebral ischemic attack, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A review of resident 40's medical record revealed the following: a. On 3/18/25 an order for Amoxicillin-Pot (Potassium) Clavulanate Tablet 875-125 MG (milligram) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for infectious pneumonitis for 7 days b. On 3/21/25 an order for Doxycycline Hyclate Oral Tablet 100 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for Pneumitis (sic) for 10 days c. On 3/21/25 at 9:35 PM, a nurses note documented, [name redacted] NP [nurse practitioner] new order: Doxycycline 100mg PO [by mouth] BID [two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that, for 1 of 41 sample residents, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences. Specifically, a resident was provided food that was listed as an allergy. Resident identifier: 46. Findings included: On 4/14/25 at 1:17 PM, an interview and observation were conducted with resident 46. Resident 46 was in her room with her lunch tray in front of her and there was fried rice with peas observed on her plate. Resident 46 stated she is allergic to peas because her body did not produce the enzymes that can break down the peas and it caused an upset stomach. Resident 46 stated she got served foods she was allergic to at least once a week. A meal ticket was observed on the tray that indicated, Allergies: LATEX, ORANGE JUICE, PEA [sic], SHELL FISH, STRAWBERRIES .Dislikes: .Vegetable (NO PEAS!! NO PEAS!!! NO PEAS!!! & NO BEETS). Resident 46's medical record was reviewed 4/13/25 through 4/16/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility was not adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from toilet and bathing facilities. Specifically, the 200 and north 300-hall shower rooms each had one call light that did not work and there were no cords attached to the call lights in the 100, 200, and north 300-hall shower rooms. Resident identifier: 46. On 4/14/25 at 1:17 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 46 and she stated that the 300-hall shower room's call light did not work and that she could get stuck in the shower. Findings include: On 4/15/25 at 9:09 AM, an observation of the 200-hall shower room was made. There were two call lights in the room, one call light was located in the first shower area and had no cord and did not activate the call system when the switch was pushed and another call light located in the second shower area had no cord. On 4/15/25 at 9:09 AM, an interview was conducted with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 51 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined for 2 of 28 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that all residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices. Specifically, a resident did not receive treatment to a right foot full thickness laceration and another resident's wounds had no documented measurements. Resident Identifiers: 15 and 26. Findings include: 1. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, difficulty walking, difficulty swallowing, enlarged prostate, and a lack of coordination. Resident 15's medical record was reviewed from 8/14/24 through 8/15/24. On 3/26/24 at 4:28 PM, a facility report incident (FRI) was submitted to the State Survey Agency (SSA). It documented that on 3/26/24 at 1:00 PM, resident 15's right fifth toe had been run over while he was being propelled down the hall in his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility did not provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Specifically, black spots were observed in the resident showers. Findings Included: On 8/13/24 at 12:10 PM, an observation was made of the 200-hall resident shower room. Black spots were observed on the lower corner base board left of the shower entrance. On 8/13/24 at 11:50 AM, an interview was conducted with Housekeeping (HK). HK stated the certified nursing assistants (CNAs) were responsible for cleaning the resident shower rooms. HK stated the certified nursing assistants were given the supplies to clean the shower rooms. HK stated they only cleaned resident room and resident common areas. On 8/13/24 at 2:06 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1 stated housekeeping cleaned the showers once a week and the cna's were responsible for cleaning up after resident showers. CNA 1 stated they sanitized the shower chairs and housekeeping scrubbed the showers. On 8/13/24 at 2:31 PM, an interview was conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for 1 of 28 sampled residents, in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, the facility did not have evidence that the violations were thoroughly investigated. Specifically, an allegation of neglect was not thoroughly investigated to determine if neglect had occurred. Resident identifier: 7. Findings include: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] on hospice services with diagnoses of traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, subsequent encounter- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified- chronic hepatic failure without coma, personal history of transient ischemic attack, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Exhibit 358 revealed that staff became aware of the incident on 1/26/24 at 2:30 am. The exhibit revealed that resident 7 had a fall and sustained a laceration above R[right] eye. Exhibit 359 revealed that, Staff found [resident 7] on the floor in her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for 2 of 28 sampled residents the facility did not ensure that the residents were free from significant medication errors. Specifically, a resident was not administered antibiotics as ordered that resulted in a treatment of an autolytic debridement and prophylactic medications were not administered to a resident who had 3rd degree burns to her buttocks and back. Resident identifiers: 15 and 26. Findings include: 1. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, difficulty walking, difficulty swallowing. enlarged prostate, and a lack of coordination. Resident 15's medical record was reviewed from 8/14/2024 through 8/15/2024. On 3/26/24 at 4:28 PM, a facility report incident (FRI) was submitted to the State Survey Agency (SSA). It was documented that on 3/26/24 at 1:00 PM, resident 15's right fifth toe had been run over while he was being propelled down the hall in his wheelchair. The wound nurse assessed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Specifically, the facility shower rooms were dirty; the temperature in a resident's room was repeatedly below 71 degrees Fahrenheit (F); the exit door to the resident smoking area would not open without getting caught on the sidewalk resulting in an injury to a resident; the wheelchairs were in disrepair for two residents; areas of the facility were dirty and in disrepair; and the paint, nightstands and clothing wardrobes in numerous rooms in the 200 and 300 hallways were in disrepair. Resident identifiers: 16, 27, 40, 50, 51, 54 and 88. Findings included: Showers 1. On 7/31/23 at 2:01 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 16. Resident 16 stated that the shower rooms were really dirty and she refused to use the shower in them. Resident 16 stated the shower rooms smelled like mildew. Resident 16 stated It is yucky and stinks really bad.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included COVID-19, viral pneumonia, chronic kidney disease stage 4, dementia, depression and acute respiratory failure. Resident 31's medical record was reviewed from 7/30/23 through 8/16/23. On 7/31/23 at 11:30 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 31's wife. Resident 31's wife stated that since resident 31 was admitted , 4 pair of pants, 7 pairs of socks, and multiple shorts and shirts had gone missing. Resident 31's wife stated that the resident's name had been put inside his clothing to prevent it from being lost. Resident 31's wife stated that she had informed multiple CNAs, but the CNAs looked but can't find the missing items. Resident 31's wife stated she had not been offered to fill out a grievance form for the missing items. An inventory list for resident 31 could not be located in the electronic medical record. On 8/16/23 at 9:44 AM, an interview was conducted with the RA. The RA confirmed that an inventory list for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 9 out of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure all alleged violations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made. Specifically, allegations of verbal and physical abuse were not reported to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within the 2 hour timeframe. Resident identifiers: 4, 12, 22, 29, 38, 51, 54, 78 and 157. Findings Include: 1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included seizures, dementia in other diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, persistent atrial fibrillation, gastroesophageal reflux disease and depression. The exhibit 358 revealed that staff became aware of an incident on 7/14/23 at 1:50 PM. The exhibit revealed that resident 12 Alleged she was sexually assaulted when she first admitted to [name of facility] by 2 males. Resident 12's medical record was reviewed 7/30/23 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b. Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included other specified arthritis multiple sites, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, borderline personality disorder, unspecified dementia, post-traumatic stress disorder, polyneuropathy, and presence of right artificial hip joint. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that resident 38 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Resident 38's medical record was reviewed 7/30/23 through 8/16/23. On 7/31/23 at 11:53 AM an interview was conducted with resident 38. Resident 38 stated when she is out smoking, she has issues with another resident 54. Resident 38 stated she goes out during supervised smoking times, but she still feels bullied by resident 54. On 8/10/23 at 9:39 AM a follow-up interview with resident 38 was conducted. Resident 38 stated there was an incident in June, it scared her, she felt hurt, and this keeps going on. Resident 38 stated resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included myocardial infarction, failure to thrive, depression, left ventricular failure, asthma, vascular dementia, and obstructive sleep apnea. Resident 21's medical record was reviewed on 7/30/23 - 8/16/23. On 7/30/23 at 12:03 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 21. Resident 21 stated she didn't feel like her CPAP machine was working correctly. Resident 21 stated she had asked for filters so she cold change them out but she hadn't gotten any from the facility. Resident 21 stated they don't clean her CPAP machine or tubing and she stated she just hasn't had the time to do it. On 7/30/23 at 12:05 PM, an observation was made of no date or time on the CPAP machine or tubing. A Resident Inventory List dated 2/23/23 documented under the section titled Dentures/Hearing Aides/Walker/Cane/Glasses/O2 Tank that resident 21 had CPAP with bag. An Admit Nurse Progress note dated 2/24/23 documented, Pt (patient) oriented to room and . pt was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, for 3 of 68 sampled residents the facility did not provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living did not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrated that such diminution was unavoidable. Specifically, three residents did not receive assistance with showers. Resident identifiers: 12, 40 and 45. Findings include: 1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included seizures, dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, persistent atrial fibrillation, anemia, melena and depression. On 7/31/23 at 3:14 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 12. Resident 12 stated she was showered not often enough. Resident 12 stated it had been over a week since her last shower. Resident 12 stated she would like more showers because when she was at home she showered everyday. Resident 12 stated if she refused a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for 3 of 68 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Specifically, dependent residents reported not receiving their twice weekly showers. Resident identifiers: 24, 81 and 87. Findings include: 1. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included incomplete paraplegia, pressure ulcer to sacral area, pressure ulcer to right hip, pressure ulcer to right ankle, morbid obesity, reduced mobility, and colostomy. On 7/31/23 at 2:58 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 24. Resident 24 stated he had been at the facility for just over a month and had only received 1 bed bath. Resident 24 stated that the wound nurse had told staff that bathing was important for his wound care. Resident 24 stated he wanted to have a bed bath at least 2 times per week. Resident 24's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Resident 6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included mild cognitive impairment, unspecified dementia, bipolar disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease. Resident 6's medical record was reviewed 7/30/23 through 8/16/23. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that resident 6 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. On 6/10/23 at 1:04 PM a Progress Nurses Note for resident 6 revealed that CNA reported to nurse that patient was on the floor in her bathroom .No visible injuries .X-ray ordered .Neuro checks started . A review of the Neurological Flow Sheet dated 6/10/23 for resident 6 releaved the following: a. Intial at 12:00 PM vital signs (V/S) completed. b. 15 min check at 12:15 PM V/S blank. c. 15 min check at 12:30 PM V/S blank. d. 15 min check at 12:45 PM V/S blank. e.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 3 of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, a resident did not receive a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine or care as ordered, and facility staff were not cleaning the resident's CPAP machines, mask and tubing. Resident identifiers: 18, 21 and 47. Findings include: 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia, conversion disorder with seizures, Todd's paralysis, morbid obesity, anxiety disorder, post traumatic stress disorder, and seizures. On 7/31/23 at 11:02 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 18. Resident 18 stated that during a recent hospitalization, he had been put on a CPAP machine. Resident 18 stated since returning to the facility, he had not received a CPAP machine or heard anything…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that medication error rates were not 5 percent or greater. Observations of 50 medication opportunities, on [DATE], revealed 7 medication errors which resulted in a 14.00% medication error rate. Specifically, a resident's blood pressure medication was administered out of the ordered parameters, a resident was not administered an antibiotic, a resident was administered the wrong dose of Vitamin D, a resident was administered a medication at the wrong time and one resident was administered an expired medication. Resident identifiers: 12, 19, 27 and 91. Findings included: 1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, depression, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, type II diabetes, hypertension and cardiac murmur. On [DATE] at 7:58 AM, an observation was made of Registered Nurse (RN) 3 during morning medication administration on the south 300 hallway. RN 3 was observed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not label all drugs and biological's used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include appropriate accessory instructions and the expiration date when applicable. Specifically, insulin pens were expired, open and available for use, not labeled with an expiration date or resident identifier information, a narcotic box in a medication room was not locked, cream for peri area care was kept in an unsecured cupboard at the nurses station. Findings included: 1. On [DATE] at 8:10 AM, an observation was made of the 300 hallway medication cart with Registered Nurse (RN) 3, the following medications were located inside: a. A pre-filled pen of Lantus (Insulin Glagine) 100 units/ml (milliliter) was opened and available for use, the pen had only a last name written on it in black marker. No open date or expiration date could be seen. On [DATE] at 8:10 AM, an interview was conducted with RN 3. RN 3 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for 4 of 68 sampled residents, the facility did not have menus that met the the nutritional needs of resident in accordance with established national guidelines. In addition, the menus were not followed. Specifically, watermelon was substituted for sausage for a breakfast, macaroni and cheese was substituted for chicken parmesan, cooked spinach was served verses broccoli. Resident identifiers: 58, 62, 65, and 92. Findings include: 1. On 7/31/23 at 11:50 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 92. When asked about the quality of food at the facility, the resident stated that there was no seasoning on the food and that its all bland. Resident 92 stated that the food was gray and horrible to look at. Resident 92 stated that the amount of food provided was minimal. Resident 92 stated that a typical breakfast consisted of one piece of toast, one strip of bacon and a small amount of eggs. Resident 92 stated that this is not enough food. When asked if the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 21 of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure each resident received food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, resident complained of the food quality, the test tray was not palatable and there were complaints in residents council. Resident identifiers: 4, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 28, 38, 40, 49, 51, 54, 58, 62, 65, 66, 85, 86, 92 and 148. Findings include: 1. On 7/31/23 at 3:08 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 12. Resident 12 stated lunch and dinner seemed like the same food. Resident 12 stated her plate consisted of four round balls of food. Resident 12 stated she did not have teeth and had to gum the food. Resident 12 stated the food did not look good. Resident 12 stated she would eat more food if the food was more palatable, like maybe soft sandwiches. Resident 12 stated she had told the staff that picked up her tray up, that she would like different food. Resident 12 stated that her tray ticket with her diet order on it had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, for 7 of 68 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide a suitable, nourishing alternate meals and snacks for residents wanting to eat at non-traditional times, or outside of scheduled meal service times. Specifically, evening snacks were either not offered, were not nourishing, and were not consistent with the resident's plan of care. In addition, there were 2 snacks available for residents throughout the day. Resident identifiers: 4, 16, 18, 20, 38, 40, and 51. Findings include: 1. On 7/31/23 at 10:51 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 18. Resident 18 stated most of the time the facility was out of snacks, or staff did not want to go down to ask for a snack. Resident 18 stated that staff told residents that after 7:00 PM, the kitchen was locked up. 2. On 7/30/23 at 12:43 PM,an interview was conducted with resident 4. Resident 4 stated she was the last to receive a meal tray because she was at the end of the hall and last on the list. Resident 4 stated most times she did not get what was on the menu or even the alternate.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined for 4 of 68 sample resident that the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that were accurately documented. Specifically, a residents sleep study and respiratory therapy notes from a hospitalization were not in their medical records. A resident did not have documentation of an emergency department observation notes in the medical records. A resident had another resident's Advance Beneficiary Notice in their medical records. Resident identifiers: 18, 62, 65 and 162. Findings include: 1. Resident 62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, insomnia and depression. Resident 62's medical record was reviewed from 7/31/23 through 8/16/23. Resident 62's progress notes revealed: a. On 5/16/23 at 11:01 AM, a nursing order for a medication increase for hydroxyzine from 25mg(milligrams) to 50mg documented, Pt [patient] c/o [complained of]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, clean linens were stored in the soiled laundry area. Clean linens were not transported in garbage bags through the facility. Staff members were observed to touch the resident's medications with bare hands during medication administration. Also, medications were dropped on the medication cart and then administered to a resident. Resident identifiers: 6 and 19. Findings include: Linens: On 8/10/23 at 12:41 PM, an observation was made of the dirty side of the laundry room which had a combined total of at least 15 Hoyer slings and gait belts that hung on the wall between two cleaning carts. [Note: One of the cleaning carts still had murky looking water inside of the mop bucket with a mop.] On 8/10/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0923 — patternHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not have adequate outside ventilation by means of windows, or mechanical ventilation, or a combination of the two. Specifically, there were odors throughout the facility. Findings include: The following observations were made: 1. On 7/30/23 at 3:39 PM, there was a urine odor that was observed in the hallway between rooms 300 to 306. At 3:51 PM, there was a urine odor that was observed in the hallway between rooms 300 to 306. 2. On 7/30/23 at 3:40 PM, there was a bowel movement odor in the hallway outside room [ROOM NUMBER] to 317. 3. On 7/31/23 at 10:46 AM, there was a strong urine odor in the hallway outside rooms 301 to 305. 4. On 8/1/23 at 2:21 PM, there was a strong bowel movement odor in the hallway outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. 5. On 8/2/23 at 2:27 PM, there was a strong urine odor outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. 6. On 8/7/23 at 10:25 AM, there was a urine odor in the hallway outside room [ROOM NUMBER] through 307. There was a bowel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident is treated with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Specifically, staff members did not knock prior to entering a resident room, and multiple residents reported that the Dietary Manager did not treat them with respect. Resident identifiers: 38 and 149. Findings include: 1. Resident 149 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cellulitis of the lower limb, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes mellitus, and sepsis. On 7/31/23 at 10:44 AM, an interview was initiated with resident 149. At 10:58 AM, during the interview, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5 entered the resident's room without knocking. As she entered, CNA 5 stated to the resident, I'm going to come back and weigh you. Oh. CNA 5 made eye contact with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 68 sample residents, the facility did not ensure the residents' right to retain and use personal possessions. Specifically, residents' clothing was lost. Resident identifiers: 31 and 94. Findings include: 1. Resident 94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included weakness, anxiety and depression. On 8/1/23 at 2:46 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident 94. Resident 94 stated that she was missing the clothing she came to the facility with. Resident 94 stated that she gave her clothing to staff to be washed. Resident 94 stated that her clothing was placed in a sack and taken down to be cleaned, but she has not received those items back. Resident 94 stated that since facility staff could not locate her clothing she was placed in a hospital gown. She stated that she did not want to wear a hospital gown and wanted to wear her own clothing. Resident 94 stated that she was missing a gray coca cola shirt, a black…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide each resident with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences. Specifically, a resident was not provided return transportation to the facility on two separate occasions when requested by the resident, after going on a leave of absence. Resident identifier: 9. Findings include: Resident 9 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included achondroplasia, altered mental status, hypokalemia, chronic pain, pressure ulcer, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, spinal stenosis, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety and dependence on a wheelchair. Resident 9's medical record was reviewed on 7/30/23 - 8/16/23. A Nurse progress note dated 5/1/23 documented the following, Pt (patient) called facility to state she was stuck up in [local city] after visiting a friend, staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not allow 1 of 68 sample residents and/or resident representatives to obtain a copy of medical records upon request and 2 days advance notice to the facility. Resident identifier: 156. Findings include: Resident 156 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and major depressive disorder. Resident 156's medical record was reviewed from 7/30/23 through 8/16/23. Resident 156's progress notes also included the following entries: a. 1/10/23 at 6:32 PM a late entry was made for an effective date of 1/9/23 at 6:32 PM: . unwitnessed fall [at 12:30 AM), resident was found outside on the southeast side of the building on the ground in the snow. Root Cause Analysis: ambulating outside of the facility without assistance . sent to the hospital for hypothermia and evaluation . b. 1/13/23 Late Entry Resident had elopement/unwitnessed fall on 1/8/2023 at 0000 (12:00 AM) resident was reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for 1 of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the residents were free from physical restraints imposed for purposes of convenience, and not required to treat the residents' medical symptoms. Specifically, a resident's left leg was tied to the wheelchair footrest with a cloth strip and the resident was not assessed regularly and evaluated for the continued need of the restraint. Resident identifier: 13. Findings include: Resident 13 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia to left side, traumatic brain injury, dementia, morbid obesity, dysphagia, and age related osteoporosis. Resident 13's medical record was reviewed on 7/30/23 - 8/16/23. On 7/30/23 at 11:00 AM, an observation was made of resident 13. Resident 13 was observed to be sitting in a wheelchair with a piece of felt cloth tied around her left leg and the wheelchair foot rest. The piece of cloth was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 2 of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not accurately assess residents. Specifically, weightloss was not documented on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, and the nature of a resident's discharge conflicted with the resident's medical record. Resident identifiers: 87 and 96. Findings include: 1. Resident 87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dysphagia, dementia, cognitive communication deficit and muscle weakness. Resident 87's medical record was reviewed from 7/30/23 through 8/16/23. On 5/15/23 an admission MDS assessment preformed revealed resident 87's weight (in pounds) 108. On 8/7/23 a quarterly MDS assessment revealed, resident 87's weight (in pounds) 96. In the section regarding weight loss, Loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% in the last 6 months it was documented as No or unknown. A care plan dated 5/4/23 revealed, Resident is at risk for nutritional and hydration status r/t…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that for 2 of 68 sample residents the resident had a discharge summary that includes, but is not limited to: a recapitulation of the resident's stay that includes, but is not limited to, diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and pertinent lab, radiology, and consultation results; a final summary of the resident's status to include items in paragraph (b)(1) of §483.20, at the time of the discharge that is available for release to authorized persons and agencies, with the consent of the resident or resident's representative; reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications (both prescribed and over-the-counter); or a post-discharge plan of care that is developed with the participation of the resident and, with the resident's consent, the resident representative(s), which will assist the resident to adjust to his or her new living environment. Resident identifier: 157 and 158. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to 1 of 68 sample residents. Specifically, multiple medications were not available for a resident the day the resident admitted . Resident identifier: 149. Findings include: Resident 149 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cellulitis of the lower limb, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes mellitus, and sepsis. On 7/31/23 at 10:44 AM, an interview was initiated with resident 149. Resident 149 stated that he did not receive his medications the first day he was at the facility. Resident 149's medical record was reviewed from 7/30/23 through 8/16/23. Resident 149's physician orders dated 7/22/23 included the following medications to be administered: a. Carvedilol 3.125 milligrams (mg) twice daily. b. Glimepiride 4 mg twice daily. Resident 149's July 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed, and revealed that on 7/22/23, resident 149 did not receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug was any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indication for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicated that the dose should be reduced or discontinued. Specifically, a resident's blood pressure (B/P) medication was administered outside of physicians ordered parameters. Resident identifier: 12. Findings included: Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included seizures, dementia, type II diabetes, atrial fibrillation, anemia and hypertension. Resident 12's medical record was reviewed on 7/30/23 through 8/16/23. Review of resident 12's physician orders revealed the following: a. Felodipine ER Oral Tablet (ER) Extended Release 24 Hour 5 MG (milligrams).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident who used psychotropic drugs was not given these drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. Specifically, there was no behavior monitoring when a resident was administered psychotropic medications. Resident identifier: 62 Findings include: Resident 62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorder, insomnia and depression. Resident 62's medical record was reviewed from 7/30/23 through 8/16/23. A review of the Pre-admission Screening Resident Review level 2 dated 4/12/23, documented under section 7: mental illness/substance use disorder diagnostic summary impression that resident 62 had major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, post traumatic stress disorder, and personality disorder. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 68 sampled residents, the facility did not obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of the residents. Specifically, resident 6 had physician's orders to obtain a basic metabolic panel (BMP) for medical monitoring purposes and the labs were not completed as ordered. Resident identifier: 6. Findings include: Resident 6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, bipolar disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease. Resident 6's medical record was reviewed 7/30/23 through 8/16/23. A review of laboratory results for resident 6 revealed that that resident 6 had a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) collected on 7/21/23. On the laboratory results sheet, there was a handwritten note: 2L (liters) IV (intravenous) fluids given. -Repeat BMP (Basic Metabolic Panel) on 7/24/23 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide or obtain laboratory services only when ordered by a physician. Specifically, laboratory services were provided for resident 6 without physician's orders. Resident identifier: 6. Findings include: Resident 6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, unspecified dementia, bipolar disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease. Resident 6's medical record was reviewed 7/30/23 through 8/16/23. A review of laboratory results for resident 6 revealed a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) was collected on 6/29/23 at 6:55 AM. A review of physician's orders revealed no laboratory order for CMP to be drawn on 6/29/23. On 8/16/23 at 2:05 PM, an interview with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) 2 was conducted. ADON 2 stated she oversaw the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0775 — isolatedKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 out of 68 sampled residents that the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record laboratory (lab) reports. Specifically, resident 6 had multiple laboratory results that were not located in the medical record. Resident identifier: 6. Findings include: Resident 6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, bipolar disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease. Resident 6's medical record was reviewed 7/30/23 through 8/16/23. Review of resident 6's laboratory orders included the following: a. On 4/13/23, a physician's order was entered into resident 6's electronic medical record to draw a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP). b. On 6/13/23, a physician's order was entered into resident 6's electronic medical record to draw a Comprehensive Metabolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 68 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide or obtain outside resources for routine and emergency dental services to meet the needs of the residents. Specifically, a resident was not provided dental services for dentures. Resident identifier: 20. Findings include: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis, disorder of central nervous system, peripheral vascular disease, chronic pain, psychosis, and muscle weakness. On 7/31/23 at 11:43 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 20. Resident 20 stated he was waiting to get dentures. Resident 20 stated he was missing teeth and then had all of his teeth removed. Resident 20 stated he had asked the dentist about dentures when he had his teeth removed. Resident 20 stated no one had followed up with him to get dentures. Resident 20 stated he had a hard time with the pronunciation of words.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-10-19 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility did not provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. Specifically, observations were made of trays delivered later than posted meal times. Findings included: On 10/12/21 at 8:52 AM, a posting of meal times was observed on the 200 hall near the nurses station. The sign documented, Meal time posting: Breakfast 100 Timpanogos: 7:00 300 [NAME]: 7:10 200 Olympus: 7:20 Assisted Dining: 7:30 Lunch 100 Timpanogos: 11:30 300 [NAME]: 11:40 200 Olympus: 11:50 Assisted Dining: 12:00 Dinner 100 Timpanogos: 5:00 300 [NAME]: 5:10 200 Olympus: 5:20 Assisted Dining: 5:40 On 10/12/21 a lunch service was observed. The following observations were made: a. On 10/12/21 at 11:50 AM, the lunch meal trays arrived to the 100 hall for delivery to the residents' rooms. At 12:06 PM, the final tray was delivered to a resident on the 100 hall. [Note: Per meal times posted for lunch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined, that the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, including properly preventing and/or containing Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Specifically, observations were made of eye protection not worn by staff, vendors or visitors, facial masks were not worn over the mouth and nose by staff, and N95 masks were not worn by third party vendors during an outbreak. Staff were observed to not perform hand hygiene while assisting residents with eating and between residents, during the passing of meal trays to residents, and during dressing changes. Shared vital signs equipment was not sanitized between resident usage and the glucometer was not cleaned according to manufacturer instructions between resident use. Resident identifiers: 62 and 288. Findings included: 1. Resident 62 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility did not provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. In addition, the facility did not exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft. Specifically, for 3 out of 49 sampled residents, there was debris on the floor of resident rooms, in the resident hallways and common areas, and the resident hallways and common areas were not vacuumed. Additionally, a resident who was missing a personal item did not have the missing item located or replaced. Resident identifiers: 13, 17, and 22. Findings included: 1. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, left ankle osteomyelitis, peripheral vascular disease, left lower limb cellulitis, type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, repeated falls, muscle weakness, left shoulder rotator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs. Specifically, for 4 out of 49 sampled residents, following witnessed and unwitnessed falls and a documented significant weight loss the facility did not maintain and update the comprehensive care plan of a resident to include the services that were to be furnished. In addition, two residents were not provide showers per the developed and initiated comprehensive care plan and a resident that was hospitalized for aspiration pneumonia did not have a comprehensive care plan developed and implemented. Resident identifiers: 22, 32, 54, and 289. Findings included: 1. Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but not limited to fracture of unspecified part of neck…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. Specifically, for 6 out of 49 sampled residents, residents were not provided assistance with showers. Resident identifiers: 17, 22, 29, 32, 51, and 288. Findings included: 1. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, left ankle osteomyelitis, peripheral vascular disease, left lower limb cellulitis, type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, repeated falls, muscle weakness, left shoulder rotator cuff tear, and presence of urogenital implants. On 10/12/21 at 10:20 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 17. Resident 17 stated he would like to shower at least twice weekly but the facility only allowed him to shower on Mondays. Resident 17 stated if there was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not label all drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include appropriate accessory instructions and the expiration date when applicable. Specifically, multiple vials of insulin were open and available for use without an expiration date and without resident identifier information and multiple bottle/packages of medication were expired and available for use. Findings included: 1. On [DATE] at 9:02 AM, an observation was made of the 100 hallway medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 6. The following medications were located inside: a. Two multiple-dose vials of Admelog (insulin lispro) 100 units/milliliter (ml) were opened and not labeled with an open date on either vial. b. A pre-filled pen of Semglee (insulin glargine) injection 100 units/ml was opened and not labeled with an open date on the pen. c. A multiple-dose vial of Lantus 100 units/ml, marked as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility did not have menus which must be followed. Specifically, during tray line service, dietary staff provided incorrect meals and serving sizes for physician prescribed therapeutic diets. Findings included: On 10/13/21 at 11:21 AM, Dietary [NAME] 1 was observed to review the menu Therapeutic Spreadsheets to determine scoop sizes for lunch service and gathering serving scoops according to spreadsheet for different diet types. On 10/13/21 at 11:26 AM, Dietary [NAME] 1 was observed to plate a meal with the tray ticket that read Consistent Carbohydrate (CCHO) Diet. Dietary [NAME] 1 reported residents who received a CCHO diet were being provided the same lunch as residents on a regular diet. Dietary [NAME] 1 reported there were no differences between the serving sizes. [Note: The lunch meal's Therapeutic Spreadsheets indicated residents' who received regular diets were to be provided a #8 sized scoop of rice (1/2 cup) and residents' who received a CCHO diet were to be provided a #16 sized scoop of rice (1/4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, cross contamination through hand hygiene and use of a sanitation rag were observed during tray line, and the resident communal refrigerator located between the 200 and 300 resident hallways was found to include unlabelled, undated items with some items remaining within the fridge past the facility policy length of 3 days. Findings included: 1. On 10/13/21 at 11:29 AM, the facility's lunch tray line was observed. At this time, food had been placed and uncovered in the steamer table for tray line service. While wearing gloves, Dietary Aide 1 was then observed to take a rag from the sanitation bucket located under the sink and wipe the service area directly in front of the opened food serving trays. At this time it was observed for the corner of the sanitation rag to enter the serving dish with Spanish rice. Dietary Aide 1 then placed the rag back into the sanitation bucket and without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that were complete, accurate, and readily accessible. Specifically, for 2 out of 49 sampled residents, a residents hospital records were not in the individual medical record and a residents hospice plan of care, nurse assessments or Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) visit notes were not in the individual medical record. Resident identifiers: 38 and 187. Findings included: 1. Resident 187 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to disorders of the digestive system, acute cholecystitis, elevated white blood cell count, schizophrenia, generalized muscle pain, difficulty walking, anxiety disorder, hypothyroidism, and hypothyroidism. Resident 187's medical record was reviewed on 10/18/21. Resident 187's progress notes were reviewed. The progress notes indicated that on 6/26/21 at 2:43 AM, pts (patients) overall face is now swollen. lip…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility did not include provisions to inform and provide written information concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment, and at the residents' option formulate an advance directive. Specifically, for 1 out of 49 sampled residents, the facility did not accurately document the resident's life-saving preferences. Resident identifier: 76. Findings included: Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, ventricular premature depolarization, hyperlipidemia, adult failure to thrive, bradycardia, coronary angioplasty, dependence on supplemental oxygen, benign prostatic hyperplasia, atherosclerotic heart disease, atrioventricular block, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute kidney failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, low back pain, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. Resident 76's medical record was reviewed on [DATE]. The Physician Orders for Life…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-19 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, the facility did not ensure that a transfer or discharge was documented in the resident's medical record and that appropriate information was communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider. Specifically, for 1 out of 49 sampled residents, no documentation was found in the resident's medical record to indicate the basis for the transfer or that the receiving provider was provided contact information of the practitioner responsible for the resident's care, resident representative contact information, advance directive information, all special instructions for care, a discharge summary, and any other documentation necessary for a safe and effective transition of care. Resident identifier: 288. Findings included: Resident 288 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of cellulitis of right lower limb, sepsis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, peptic ulcer, chronic pain,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-19 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure that the resident received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities. Specifically, for 1 out of 49 sampled residents, a resident received a new prescription for eye glasses and the new glasses were not ordered as the resident believed they had been. Resident identifier: 15. Findings included: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of acute pulmonary edema, atrial fibrillation, sleep apnea, shortness of breath, morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, hypertension, and anxiety disorder. On 10/12/21 at 3:02 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 15. Resident 15 stated that he had an eye exam at the facility and ordered new glasses approximately one month ago. Resident 15 stated that he had asked about when the glasses would be ready, but had not heard back from any of the staff. Resident 15 stated he could not see without the new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure that a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers (PU) and did not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrated that they were unavoidable. Specifically, for 1 out of 49 sampled residents, a resident developed an unstageable pressure ulcer on the second metatarsal-head pad of the plantar surface and interventions were not implemented specific to the prevention of its development. Resident identifier: 288. Findings included: Resident 288 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of cellulitis of right lower limb, sepsis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, peptic ulcer, chronic pain, hypertension, sleep apnea, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and anxiety disorder. On 10/12/21 at 9:59 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 288. Resident 288 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure that residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that this was not possible. Specifically, for 1 out of 49 sampled residents, a resident who had experienced a significant weight loss did not have interventions put in place to prevent further significant weight loss. Resident identifier: 54. Findings included: Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but not limited to fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), chronic kidney disease stage 4, gastroparesis, repeated falls, essential hypertension, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, difficulty in walking, acquired absence of other left toe(s), pain in left foot, acquired absence of other right toe(s), pain in right foot, anemia, hypokalemia, other disorders of plasma-protein metabolism,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-19 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility did not ensure each resident received drinks, including water and other liquids, consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration. Specifically, for 1 out of 49 sampled residents, a resident with a physician's order for nectar thick liquids was provided with thin liquids from care staff and was provided thin liquids on a meal tray. Resident Identifier: 33. Findings included: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left dominant side, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, chronic respiratory failure, dysarthria following cerebral infarction, history of pulmonary embolism, history of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, dependence on supplemental oxygen, protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2021-10-19 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility did not have the nurse staffing information posted. The facility must post the following information on a daily basis: Facility name, the current date, the resident census, and the total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: Registered nurses, Licensed practical nurses, and Certified nurse aides. The facility must post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift. Specifically, the nurse staffing data was not posted on a daily basis. Findings included: On 10/12/21 at 8:15 AM, the nurse staffing information was observed. The nurse staffing information was posted at the front reception area of the facility. The nurse staffing information was dated 10/6/21, and the current census was documented as 94. On 10/19/21 at 8:00 AM, an interview was conducted with the Transportation staff member. The Transportation staff member stated the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$22,562 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-08-15
- $14,544 — penalty dated 2024-08-15
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CASCADES HEALTHCARE — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| LANGFORD, SCOTT | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/01/2014 |
| MCSPADDEN, DARIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| BARNEY, JANETT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/18/2018 |
| BROWN, GARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/18/2018 |
| FULLMER, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| SMITH, VAL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/18/2018 |
| WHITE, CRAIG | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/18/2018 |
| CASCADES HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| BAIRD, GREGORY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| NEEDLES, TIMOTHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/03/2025 |
| BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/18/1999 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $572K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in UT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Utah Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 465111. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.