Cascades at Riverwalk
1012 West Jordan River Boulevard, Midvale, UT 84047 · Government - Hospital district · 120 certified beds · (801) 565-0800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $23,829 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.9% | 11.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 3.4% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 28.4% | 16.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.6% | 15.1% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.6% | 25.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 3.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.6% | 21.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.3% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 0.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.5% | 91.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 5.4% | 16.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 1.4% | 11.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.75 | 1.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.26 | 1.43 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 118 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 62.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.0%CMS range 52.1–66.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 6.6–13.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 69.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.3%CMS range 2.9–9.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 102.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.76 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, for 1 of 43 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections. Specifically, the facility bladder scanner was broken and a resident required bladder scans prior to being straight catheterized (cathed) to remove urine. The resident was transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (UTI) and sepsis. Resident identifier: 77. Findings included: Resident 77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sepsis, diabetes mellitus, UTI, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and gastrointestinal reflux disease. On 10/2/23 at 10:51 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 77. Resident 77 stated that he was unable to walk since he had back surgery a year ago. Resident 77 stated he thought staff were checking his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility did not inform each resident periodically during the resident's stay, of services available in the facility and of charges for those services, including any charges for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate. Specifically, for 2 out of 3 sampled residents, 2 residents did not receive a Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) or a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) when one was due. Resident identifiers: 60 and 61.Findings included:Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included myotonic muscular dystrophy, acute respiratory failure, and major depressive disorder.Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included atherosclerotic heart disease, cervical disc disorder with radiculopathy, fusion of spine cervical region, polyneuropathy, dementia, and anxiety disorder.There were no NOMNC's located in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food items in the reach-in refrigerator were not labeled, food in the walk-in refrigerator was not labeled and/or dated, and food in the walk-in freezer was open to air. Findings included:On 9/7/25 at 8:49 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. In the reach-in refrigerator, 2 trays containing bowls of a white substance were covered with plastic wrap, but were not labeled or dated. In the walk-in refrigerator, a container of vanilla low-fat yogurt did not have an open date. During the observation, one of the dietary aides entered the walk-in refrigerator and returned a large container of mayonnaise to the shelf. It was approximately 3/4 empty. There was no open date on the lid. Also, a large plastic container of a red liquid was observed with no label or date on the container. In the walk-in freezer, a box of mixed vegetables was open to air, a box of frozen cookie dough was open to air, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 3 of 39 sampled residents, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, staff did not use personal protective equipment (PPE) when administering medications through a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line, staff did not wear PPE when entering resident rooms with contact precautions and PPE was not worn in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) rooms. Resident identifiers: 11, 41, 85 Findings include:1. On 9/9/25 at 8:15 AM, the west hallway morning medication pass was observed. Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was observed to enter the room of resident 11 with oral medications and exited without the medications. RN 1 stated she had administered the oral medications to resident 11. RN 1 was not observed to have donned gloves or a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 39 sample residents who was continent of bladder on admission receives services and assistance to maintain continence. Specifically, one resident who was continent upon admission later became incontinent and was not on a toileting program. Resident identifier: 24. Findings include: Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] which included hemiplegia, malignant neoplasm of brain, obesity, hyperlipidemia and mild cognitive impairment. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident 24 was always continent of bladder. Quarterly MDS's dated 2/22/24 through 7/3/25 revealed resident 24 was frequently incontinent of bladder and was not on a toileting program (TP). On 1/22/24, an admission Assessment was completed for resident 24. The assessment indicated that the resident was fully continent of urine. Review of resident 24's care plan revealed the following: a. On 1/25/24, the resident was documented as having an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to 1 of 39 sample residents. Specifically, one resident did not have 6 medications available for administration on multiple occasions. Resident identifier: 5. Findings include:Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pulmonary edema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension, congestive heart failure, protein calorie malnutrition, chronic respiratory failure, osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. Resident 5's medical record was reviewed between 9/7/25 through 9/10/25. Resident 5's May 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed. The following medications were documented as not being administered per the physician's order: Lactobacillus Rhamnosus oral packet, one packet by mouth one time a day. The medication was not administered on 5/2/25 or 5/3/25. The medication was discontinued on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 39 sample residents' drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used in excessive dose (including duplicate drug therapy); or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued. Specifically, a resident received a medication used to treat hypotension outside of prescribed parameters. Resident identifier: 5. Findings include: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pulmonary edema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension, congestive heart failure, protein calorie malnutrition, chronic respiratory failure, osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. Resident 5's medical record was reviewed between 9/7/25 through 9/10/25. Resident 5 had a physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the provider failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accidents hazards as was possible. Specifically, a resident who was in the shower did not have access to a call light. Resident identifier: 3 In response to the incident involving Resident 3, the facility identified the quality deficiency and developed a corrective action plan. At the time of the complaint survey, it was determined that the facility had implemented corrective measures and met the requirements of F689. Due to the facility ' s corrective measures, the noncompliance was determined to be past noncompliance. The facility ' s corrective action plan, which was developed and implemented by April 9, 2025, included the following measures: a. Removing Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 from the facility staff. b. Adding a call light to Resident 3 ' s shower. c. Evaluating all current residents to ensure call lights were accessible in areas required based on their specific needs and care plans. d. Reeducating staff on Resident 3 ' s care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility did not ensure a clean and comfortable homelike environment. Specifically, walls with large white patches and not painted, privacy curtain dirty, wheelchair armrests are cracked and have duct tape on them, melted piece of carpet floor, and threshold missing and replaced with duct tape. Resident identifiers: 45 Findings include: 1. On 10/2/23 at 10:41 AM, an observation was made of white patches on painted accent wall in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 2. On 10/10/23 at 10:44 AM, an observation was made of the carpet on 100 Hall in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The carpet had black spots on it. 3. On 10/10/23 at 11:57 AM, an observation was made of white spots on painted accent wall in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 4. On 10/10/23 at 11:58 AM, an observation was made of carpet duct taped down on 200 hall in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] and 220. 5. On 10/10/23 at 12:02 PM, an observation of chipped paint on wall in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 6. On 10/10/23 at 3:30 PM, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 14 of 43 sampled resident, that the facility did not provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, residents complained of food quality, a test tray was bland and resident council minutes revealed complaints of food quality. Resident identifiers: 7, 12, 22, 25, 29, 30, 50, 56, 62, 72, 77, 82, 85 and 365. Findings include: 1. On 10/2/23 at 3:00 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 12. Resident 12 stated the food was not good. Resident 12 stated the pasta was soaked in water and then when served on the plate there was water all over the plate. Resident 12 stated she talked to the Dietary Manager (DM) and the DM had been really good to work with. 2. On 10/2/23 02:36 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 22. Resident 22 stated she was lactose intolerant and was served cheese, milk and dairy food. Resident 22 stated the mashed potatoes had milk and butter in them. Resident 22 stated her family provided her breakfast daily. Resident 22 stated there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 2 out of 43 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the interdisciplinary team had determined that the resident's right to self administer medications was clinically appropriate. Specifically, a resident was observed to have medications on the bedside table in a medication cup and another resident was not evaluated to determine if they were safe to self administer medications. Resident identifiers: 9 and 47. Findings included: 1. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paraplegia, cirrhosis of liver, portal hypertension, chronic respiratory failure, ascites, pressure-induced deep tissue damage, stage 2 pressure ulcer, stage 4 pressure ulcer of sacral region, hypertension, hepatic encephalopathy, pressure ulcer of right buttock stage 3, anxiety disorder, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. On [DATE] at 9:59 AM, an observation was made of resident 9's room. There were four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 3 out of 43 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure all alleged violations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made. Specifically, the facility did not report a allegations of abuse within 2 hours of the allegation. Resident identifiers: 12, 20 and 157. Findings include: 1. Resident 12 was 9/2/22 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included spinal stenosis, pneumonia, diabetes mellitus, and fusion of spine. A form titled Exhibit 358 revealed that the facility reported to the State Survey Agency on 8/18/23 at 5:54 PM that on 7/24/23 at 12:17 PM resident 12 was found lying on her left side, with right arm underneath her. Resident 12 sustained a 2 inch jagged laceration to the left side of her forehead. Resident was sent to the hospital. Resident 12's medical record was reviewed 10/3/23 through 10/10/23. A nursing progress note dated 7/24/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 or 43 sampled residents that the facility did not ensure the comprehensive care plan included the services needed to achieve the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, a resident with pressure ulcers did not have a care plan that addressed the specific pressure ulcers. Resident identifier: 71. Findings include: Resident 71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, pressure ulcer of right heel stage 3, pressure ulcer of left ankle stage 2. Resident 71's medical record was reviewed on 10/3/23. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented that resident 71 required two person physical assistance and was total dependence for bed mobility, toilet use, personal hygiene, dressing. In addition the MDS assessment documented that resident 71 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 43 sampled residents, the facility did not provide the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for residents who were unable to carry out the activities of daily living. Specifically, a resident was not showered twice weekly according to his preferences. Resident identifier: 77. Findings include: Resident 77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sepsis, diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection, hereditary and idiopathic, spinal stenosis, generalized anxiety, and major depressive disorder. On 10/2/23 at 11:05 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 77. Resident 77 was observed to be laying in bed. Resident 77 stated he sometimes only received a bed bath once a week. Resident 77 stated that he would like at least 2 bed baths per week. Resident 77 stated there were not enough staff to provide a bed bath twice a week. Resident 77's medical record was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure for 1 of 43 sampled residents, that residents did not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrated that they were unavoidable; and the residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services. Specifically, a resident developed pressure ulcers during his stay and did not receive timely skin checks or wound treatments. Resident identifier: 71. Findings included: Resident 71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, pressure ulcer of right heel stage 3, and pressure ulcer of left ankle stage 2. Resident 71's medical record was reviewed on 10/3/23. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented that resident 71 required two person physical assistance and was total dependence for bed mobility, toilet use, personal hygiene, and dressing. In addition, the MDS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for 1 of 43 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure a resident receiving enteral feeding received appropriate care and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding. Specifically a resident's feeding tube bag had not been changed for 3 days. Resident identifier: 98 Findings Included: Resident 98 was admitted to the facility 7/12/23 with the following diagnosis that included dysphagia, aphasia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and vascular dementia. On 10/2/23 at 2:12 PM, an observation was made of resident 98's feeding tube setup. A 1000 milliliter (ml) feeding bag was observed with the date of 9/29/23 and time of 1:54 PM. Resident 98's medical record was reviewed on 10/3/23. A physician enteral feed order with a start date of 9/11/23 documented one time a day for enteral care: Change syringe daily, feed supplies, and cylinder. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the months of September and October were reviewed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record the review it was determined, for 1 of 43 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. Specifically, a resident with documented pain had received pain medication recommendations from the pain clinic that were not implemented. Resident identifier: 160. Findings included: Resident 160 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included non-pressure chronic ulcer of unspecified part of left lower leg limited to breakdown of skin, methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection, major depressive disorder, resistance to multiple antimicrobial drugs, carrier of infections with a predominantly sexual mode of transmission, pain, chronic pain, and long term use of antibiotics. Resident 160's medical record was reviewed on 10/10/23. An admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 43 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents who received psychotropic drugs were not given these drugs unless the medication was to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. Specifically, the facility continued to administer psychotropic medications after the recommendation to discontinued the psychotropic medications. Resident identifier 96. Findings include: Resident 96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, unsteadying on feet, anxiety disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, insomnia, and cerebral edema. Resident 96's medical record was reviewed 10/3/23 through 10/10/23. A physician's order revealed orders dated 9/19/23 for the following: a. Lamotrigine Oral Tablet 25 milligrams (MG) to be given two times a day for anticonvulsant.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 43 sampled residents, the facility did not provide each resident with food that accommodated resident allergies, intolerance's and preferences. Specifically, a resident with lactose intolerance was not provided food and a supplement that was lactose free. Resident identifier: 22. Findings include: Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, vitamin deficiency, rheumatoid arthritis with rheumatoid factor of multiple sites without organ or systems involvement, pain, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. On 10/02/23 at 2:36 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 22. Resident 22 stated that she was lactose intolerant. Resident 22 stated that the facility served cheese, milk and dairy foods to her for meals. Resident 22 stated that she had mashed potatoes served to her with butter and milk in them. Resident 22 stated that her family usually provided her breakfast. Resident 22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, there were soiled areas in the kitchen and the vents above the food preparation area had dust on them. Findings include: 1. On 10/2/23 at 9:48 AM, the following observations were made: a. The preparation fridge handles were soiled. b. There was a container with pineapple in it in the refrigerator with a broken lid on it. c. The vents above the dry storage area and preparation area were soiled with dust. d. There was a yellow pipe behind the range that was soiled with black substance. e. A table with bases and hot plates soiled with crumbs and debris. f. The area under the dirty dish area in the dish machine room was soiled with food splatter and debris. The shelves had chemicals stored on it. g. There was food splatter on the ceiling in the dish machine room. h. There was food debris on a cart that clean cups were placed on. The cups were placed with rims down and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not provide, for 1 of 43 sampled residents, specialized rehabilitative services such as physical therapy and occupational therapy that were required in the resident's comprehensive plan of care. Specifically, a resident was not provided specialized rehabilitation services after returning from the hospital with a physician's orders to be evaluated and treated. Resident identifier: 77. Findings include: Resident 77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sepsis, urinary tract infection (UTI), degenerative disc disease, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, spinal stenosis, generalized anxiety, and major depressive disorder. On 10/2/23 at 10:50 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 77. Resident 77 stated he went into the ER a couple months ago for a bad UTI that got into his blood stream. Resident 77 stated he was having pain in his feet and up his sides. Resident 77 stated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, that the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, for 1 out of 43 sampled residents, a resident's urinal containing urine was stored on the bedside table next to and on the resident's food tray. Resident identifier: 92. Findings included: Resident 92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus, spastic hemiplegia affecting left side, reduced mobility, cirrhosis of liver, vascular dementia, difficulty in walking, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, unsteadiness on feet, muscle spasm, mood disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. On 10/2/23 at 11:17 AM, an observation was conducted of resident 92's room. Resident 92's urinal was observed to be on resident 92's bed side table and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-10-28 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined the facility did not employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. If a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional was not employed full-time, the facility must designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services who was a certified dietary manager. Specifically, the Dietary Manager (DM) for this facility had not yet completed certification to become a certified dietary manager. Findings included: On 10/27/21 at 9:16 AM, the DM was interviewed regarding her qualifications as a dietary manager. The DM provided documentation regarding course work that had been completed to become a certified dietary manager. The DM reported she had not yet taken her examination to become a certified dietary manager. The DM reported she had worked for this facility for 2 years and plans to take her examination to become a certified dietary manager in the near future. The DM stated the Registered Dietitian…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-10-28 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The facility must review and update that assessment as necessary, and at least annually. The facility must also review and update this assessment whenever there was, or the facility plans for, any change that would require a substantial modification to any part of this assessment. Specifically, the facility provided a data analysis that was not dated and incomplete of information regarding who completed the assessment and what actions were being taken to ensure necessary resources to care for its residents. Findings include: On 10/25/21 survey staff requested the facility assessment as part of required documentation from the facility. A binder marked State Survey was provided to the surveyors for review and subsequently scanned and sent on 10/26/21 at 5:13 PM. On 10/28/21 the facility assessment was reviewed. 1. The assessment provided included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews it was determined, for 3 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Specifically, who were dependent on staff for ADL care, showers or bathes were not provided or offered per the assigned bathing schedule. Resident identifiers: 7, 44 and 46. Findings included: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with medical diagnoses that included irritable bowel syndrome, dysphagia following cerebrovascular disease, contracture to the left and right ankles, gastroparesis, protein-calorie malnutrition, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, aphasia, degenerative disease of the basal ganglia, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, mood disorder, dysarthria, reduced mobility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 8 of 38 residents, that the facility did not provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnosis of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. Specifically, residents complained to the survey staff and in resident council meetings about the staffing level, residents were not receiving regularly scheduled showers, and resident call lights were not being answered in a timely manner. Resident identifiers: 15, 19, 22, 24, 44, 46, 53 and 71. Findings include: 1. On 10/26/21 at 11:59 AM, using his motorized wheelchair, resident 53 was observed to go to the nurses' station and ask for assistance getting into bed. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 spoke to the resident asking him to go back to his room and place on his call light to recieve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that for 6 of 38 sample residents, the facility did not ensure that the drug regimen of the residents were reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist. Specifically, residents did not have monthly pharmacy reviews completed and recommendations were not implemented in a timely manner. Residents: 6, 62, 65, 21, 28 and 56. Findings include: 1. Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included polyneuropathy, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. On 10/27/21 resident 56's medical record was reviewed. There were no pharmacy reviews in resident 56's medical record. A pharmacy review binder was provided. The binder revealed no pharmacy reviews for resident 56's for June 2021, July 2021, August 2021 and September 2021. 2. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] encephalopathy, systolic and diastolic heart failure, atrial fibrillation, leukemia, diabetes, and major depressive disorder.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for 1 of 38 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug was any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued; or any combinations of the reasons above. Specifically, the facility did not administer medications according to parameters ordered by the physician. Resident identifier: 6. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, essential (primary) hypertension, muscle weakness. Resident 6's medical record was reviewed on 10/27/21. 1. Resident 6's physician's orders dated 9/29/21, revealed Carvedilol 25 milligrams (mg) given 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review it was determined, for 14 of 38 sample residents, the facility did not ensure each resident received and provided, food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, residents had complaints regarding the overall palatability of the food, grievances and resident council minutes revealed complaints about the food, and the test tray was not attractive and palatable. Resident identifiers: 7, 9, 15, 18, 21, 23, 24, 40, 44, 46, 49, 55, 63, and 70. Findings included: 1. On 10/25/21 at 9:42 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 21. Resident 21 stated there were to many spices and the food was cold. Resident 21 stated that she did not hardly eat dinner the night before because she was not sure if it was beef or something else. 2. On 10/25/21 at 10:19 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 44. Resident 44 stated that lunch and dinners were not good. Resident 44 stated that sometimes the food just doesn't taste good. Resident 44 stated that the food usually lukewarm. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, including COVID-19. Specifically, staff were observed without Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), a vital signs machine was disinfected in the hallway without the appropriate solution, a laundry aide was not observed performing hand hygiene after touching surfaces in resident rooms, staff did not know where visitors should doff PPE and food was transported uncovered through the hallway. Findings include: 1. The following observations were made of staff: a. On 10/27/21 at 12:18 PM, an observation was made of the Activities Director (AD). The AD was observed in the hallway and in the conference room with surveyors without a mask or eye protection. The AD was within 6 feet of surveyors and other staff without the mask…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Specifically, a resident was not provided with interpretive services, her call light was not responded to in a manner that promoted quality of life, and she was spoken of by staff in a manner that did not promote dignity. Resident identifier: 19. Findings include: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, hyperlipidemia, and muscle weakness. On 10/25/21 at 9:09 AM, an observation was made of Registered Nurse (RN) 4 entering resident 19's room. RN 4 stated Resident 19 doesn't speak English so good luck trying to talk to her. Resident 19 was in the room when RN 4 made the statement.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and observation, it was determined that for 1 or 38 sample residents the facility did not provide reasonable accommodation of the needs and preferences. Specifically, a resident had expressed concerns as well as completed a grievance form regarding a certain staff member. The staff member was still working with the resident. Resident identifier: 322. Findings include: On 10/26/21 at 2:55 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 322. Resident 322 stated that she had made multiple complaints regarding Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 8. Resident 322 stated she did not get along with CNA 8 and felt that CNA 8 was unkind to her. Resident 322 stated that she had complained to multiple nurses, the schedule coordinator, as well as completing a formal grievance. Resident 322 said that nothing has been resolved with this issue. Resident 322 stated that today she had CNA 8 caring for her. On 10/26/21 at 2:59 PM, an observation made of CNA 8. CNA 8 was observed to be working in the assigned area that resident 322 resided in. On 10/27/21 at approximately 10:30 AM, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that resident's had the right to request, refuse, and /or discontinue treatment and to formulate an advance directive. Specifically, resident's advanced directives were not accurately documented in the medical records. Resident identifiers: 44 and 62. Findings include: 1. Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included arthritis, cerebellar ataxia, aphasia, embolism and thrombosis, and depressive episodes. Resident 44's medical record was reviewed on 10/27/21. Resident 44's Provider Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form dated 4/20/2020 and signed by the physician on 4/28/2020 revealed resident 44's desire was to attempt to resuscitate and provide full treatment for medical interventions. A physicians' order dated 4/20/2020 revealed Code Status: DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). On 10/26/21 at approximately 1:00 PM, an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined, for 2 of 38 sample residents, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. The facility did not ensure the comprehensive care plans described the services that were furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, resident's care plan interventions were not implemented, in regards to the use of hearing devices and the use of interpretive services . Resident identifiers: 7 and 19. Findings included: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included irritable bowel syndrome, dysphagia following cerebrovascular disease, contracture to the left and right ankles,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-28 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living which included bathing. Specifically, a resident complained they were not showered according to their shower schedules. Resident identifiers: 5. Findings Include: Resident 5 was admitted to facility on 9/26/2020 with diagnoses which included Multiple sclerosis, atazia, polyneuopathy and epilepsy. On 10/25/21 at 9:55 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 5. Resident 5 stated the last shower he received was on 10/20/21. Resident 5 stated that he was scheduled to have showers Tuesdays and Saturday in the afternoon. Resident 5 stated that he would like to have showers on these days but that he was only showered 1 time a week. Resident 5 stated that he occasionally had to remind staff to shower him. On 10/27/21 at 8:20 AM, a follow-up interview with resident 5. Resident 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-28 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and hearing abilities. Specifically, the facility did not provide a resident with assistance in maintaining hearing ability through coordination in obtaining hearing aides. In addition, the staff continued to document utilization of hearing aides after the resident's hearing aides had been missing. Resident identifier: 7. Findings included: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included irritable bowel syndrome, dysphagia following cerebrovascular disease, contracture to the left and right ankles, gastroparesis, protein-calorie malnutrition, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, aphasia, degenerative disease of the basal ganglia, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that the environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible. Specifically, a public restroom that residents had access to had elevated water temperatures in the hand washing sink. Findings include: On 10/28/21 at 8:54 AM, an observation was made of the hand washing sink in a public restroom in the lobby. The restroom was not locked and was across from the facility dining room. The women's restroom water temperature of the sink was 131.4 degrees Fahrenheit within 30 seconds. The men's restroom water temperature of the sink was 135.0 degrees Fahrenheit. On 10/28/21 at 9:08 AM, an interview was conducted with the Receptionist. The Receptionist stated that residents would be able to get into the restrooms. The Receptionist stated there was a resident that was blind and wandered. The Receptionist stated that the resident would have access the restroom. The Receptionist stated that another resident had used the bathroom about a month prior. On 10/28/21 at 11:20 AM, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 38 sample residents, the facility did not ensure that residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that this was not possible. Specifically, one resident who had significant weight loss was not provided interventions to prevent further weight loss. Resident identifier: 6. Findings Include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus type two, diabetic neuropathy, dementia without behavioral disturbance, chronic kidney disease stage three, cognitive communication deficit, reduced mobility, retention of urine and essential hypertension. On 10/25/21 at 1:57 PM, an interview was conducted with a family member of resident 6. The family member stated he was concerned about the resident's food intake. He stated he and another family member came each day to assist the resident with eating. The family member stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-28 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, it was determined, for 1 of 38 sample residents, that the facility did not adequately equip each resident with a communication system that was relaying calls directly to staff or a centralized work area. Specifically, a resident's call light was not functioning properly. Resident Identifier 322. Findings Include: On 10/27/21 at approximately 10:30 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 322. Resident 322 stated that occasionally the wait for a call light to be answered had been hours but had since discovered the call light will not work occasionally. Resident 322 stated that in order to get the call light to turn on. Resident 322 stated she pressed the hand held call light multiple times. Resident 322 stated that if that did not work then resident 322 placed the bed in a relined position to press the call light button on the wall until it lit up. Resident 322 stated if it still did not illuminate, then she called a family member to express needs and the family member will then call the facility. On 10/28/21 at 10:19 AM, a follow up interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$23,829 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $23,829 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CASCADES HEALTHCARE — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 1.9 | +2.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 1.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCSPADDEN, DARIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2017 |
| CRUMP, JASON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2017 |
| LANGFORD, SCOTT | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/01/2017 |
| BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2017 |
| CASCADES HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| CUNNINGHAM, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/04/2025 |
| FULLMER, CHAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2017 |
| MUIR, GARTH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| WHITE, DEREK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in UT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Utah Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 465184. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.