Arcadia Care Bloomington
1509 North Calhoun Street, Bloomington, IL 61701 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 115 certified beds · (309) 827-6046 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $132,974 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-15)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.7% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.0% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 98.4% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.9% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 33.2% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.2% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.5% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.4% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 39.3% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.0% | 26.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.3% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.79 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.03 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 14.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.4%CMS range 31.2–61.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 7.2–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 14.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 23.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 19.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 88.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 4.1–12.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.40 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 89.3 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.59 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.66 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow facility transportation policy resulting in transportation staff failing to properly secure a resident's wheelchair prior to driving, resulting in the wheelchair tipping backward and falling to the floor when the van accelerated from a traffic light due to being improperly secured in the wheelchair securement system. Additionally, staff failed to respond to a resident's request for medical attention and did not summon emergency medical services following the incident. These failures affect one of four residents (R12) reviewed for accidents in the sample list of 16. These failures resulted in R12 experiencing severe pain and sustaining a compression fracture requiring hospitalization after R12 fell to the van floor in the wheelchair. Findings include:The Immediate Jeopardy began on 3/30/26 when the facility failed to secure R12's wheelchair in the facility van before driving and R12 tipped backward in the wheelchair and fell to the floor. V1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a resident's privacy and dignity by failing to ensure shower rooms were protected from unauthorized entry during bathing and personal care for two (R84, R52) of two residents and failed to protect a resident's dignity and privacy by failing to cover an indwelling urinary collection bag for one (R39) of one resident reviewed for infection control in the sample list of 47. The facility's failure to protect residents from repeated privacy intrusions during bathing caused emotional distress, fear, embarrassment, and loss of personal privacy. These outcomes constitute actual harm as R84 and R52 experienced negative psychosocial consequences directly related to the facility's deficient practice. Findings Include: On 5/31/2026 at 11:05AM, V1 Administrator stated V1 submitted an initial report on 5/29/26 due to R84 reporting two males were trying to enter the shower room while R84 was taking a shower. V1 stated V1 has not completed a full investigation and submitted a final to the State Agency. On 5/31/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement appropriate accident and fall prevention interventions to prevent accidental removal of a feeding tube and falls for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for accidents on the sample list of six. These failures resulted in R1 pulling R1's feeding tube out requiring hospital reinsertion of the feeding tube and R1 falling and suffering a laceration above the left eyebrow requiring three sutures. Findings Include: The facility's Fall Prevention Program dated October 2024 documents the program's purpose is to assure the safety of all residents in the facility and is to include measures which determine the individual needs of each resident by assessing the risk of falls, implementing appropriate interventions to provide necessary supervision, and using assistive devices as necessary. A Fall Risk Assessment should be performed at least quarterly and with each significant change in mental or functional condition and after any fall incident. Safety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to apply a vehicle safety restraint during transportation in the facility van for one of three (R1) residents reviewed for falls on the sample list of three. This failure resulted in R1's wheelchair flipping backwards in the facility van during transport and R1 sustained a left side rib fracture. Findings Include: The Motor Vehicle Safety Program dated January 2025 documents seat belts and shoulder harnesses (occupant restraint systems) must be worn or used whenever the vehicle is in operation. The vehicle may not move until all passengers have fastened their restraints. R1's Fall Follow-up Note dated 5/15/25 documents R1 fell from his wheelchair while in the facility van. R1 was being transported back to the facility and his wheelchair was not properly secured. The root cause of the fall was determined to be the wheelchair was not properly secured. R1's Incident Note dated 5/12/25 documents R1 sustained a fall at 6:20 PM in the facility van. R1 is alert…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Failures at this level required more than one deficient practice statement. A. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote residents' dignity by failing to care for and treat them with respect and in a manner that promotes their quality of life and individualized needs. This failure affects two of six residents (R8, R52) reviewed for dignity in the sample list of 39. This failure resulted in emotional distress and a significant increase in anxiety for one resident (R52). Findings Include: The facility policy titled 'Dignity' effective March 2024 documents the facility shall promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality. The facility shall consider the resident's lifestyle and personal choices identified through the assessment processes to obtain a picture of his/her individual needs and preferences. Staff shall carry out activities in a manner which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement fall interventions, provide supervision to prevent a fall, provide safe transfer assistance, and thoroughly investigate falls to identify root cause and develop post fall interventions for three (R1, R2, R3) of three residents reviewed for falls in the sample list of nine. These failures resulted in R1 falling and sustaining a subdural hematoma and R3 falling and sustaining a scalp laceration that required sutures. Findings include: 1.) R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 10/16/23 documents R1 has moderate cognitive impairment, has upper/lower extremity range of motion impairment, and requires substantial/maximal assistance for chair/bed transfers. R1's Care Plan revised on 5/1/23 documents R1 transfers with extensive assistance of two staff. R1's Care Plan revised on 5/4/23 documents R1 has decreased ability to self transfer due to Parkinson's Disease and spastic movements/tremors. R1's Care Plan revised 11/28/23 documents R1 is at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform weekly skin assessments for three of three residents (R2, R8, R15) reviewed for wound care management in a total sample of 18. Findings include: Findings include:R2's Care Plan initiated 5/8/2026 documents R2 was admitted to the facility 5/7/26 and has diagnoses of Congestive Heart Failure, Morbid (severe) Obesity Due to Excess Calories, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Foot Ulcer, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy, Charcot Foot due to Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5, End Stage Renal Disease on Hemodialysis, Atherosclerosis of Native Artery of Both Lower Extremities with Intermittent Claudication. R2's Care Plan dated 5/12/2026 documents R2 is at risk for skin impairment related to decreased mobility. R2's physician's order dated 5/13/2026 documents an order for weekly skin assessment every night shift every Wednesday, notify doctor if new impairment. R2's skin-other-skin assessment dated [DATE] documents a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to utilize appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, failed to remove soiled PPE prior to exiting a resident's room, failed to prevent potential cross contamination during incontinence/face care, and failed to ensure soiled linens were not placed on the floor for three of three residents (R8, R13, and R15) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 18. On 6/12/26 at 11:53 a.m., V2 Assistant Director of Nursing/Wound Nurse/Infection Control, entered R8's room to perform wound care. A sign on R8's door documents R8 requires Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP). V2 did not don a gown a before entering R8's room or during wound care. On 6/15/2026 at 8:02 a.m., V15 Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) stated staff should wear gloves, a gown and a mask when providing care for residents on Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP). On 6/12/26 at 11:45 a.m., V2 Assistant Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours per day. This failure has the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 5/31/26 documents a facility census of 91 residents. Facility Nursing Staff Daily Schedule Sheets document the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours on 5/4/26 and 5/22/26. On 6/3/26 at 10:14 AM, V2 Director of Nursing confirmed the facility did not have RN coverage on 5/4/26 and 5/22/26. The facility's Facility assessment dated [DATE] documents a Registered Nurse is needed every day in order to provide competent support and care for the facility's resident population.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were discarded and not available for use and failed to ensure medications were stored in a manner to prevent potential cross contamination. This failure has the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Medication Storage policy dated 10/2015 documents the facility should destroy or return all discontinued, outdate/expired, or deteriorated medications or biologicals. On 6/2/26 at 8:04 AM, V43 License Practical Nurse (LPN) was in the medication storage room. There were three bottles of Oyster Shell Calcium Plus Vitamin D (mineral supplement) 250 milligrams (mg) containing 100 tablets sitting on the shelf. An expiration date of 5/26 was printed on these three bottles of Oyster Shell Calcium Plus Vitamin D. There was also two bottles of Bisacodyl (laxative) 5 mg containing 200 tablets sitting on the shelf. An expiration date of 2/26 was printed on these two bottles of Bisacodyl. At this time there were five bottles of Jevity 1.2 CAL…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect residents' right to a functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment in the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 5/31/26 documents a facility census of 91 residents. On 5/31/26 at 11:16 AM the facility had multiple areas with scraped paint on the walls and doors, ceiling tiles that show water damage and discoloration, floors that appear dirty and worn, broken tile, missing baseboards and trim throughout the facility, cloudy windows, dirty windowsills, and old discolored sanded wood handrails with no paint or stain. On 6/3/26 at 10:50 AM V1 Administrator confirmed the facility needed a lot of environmental work, both cometic and functional. On 05/31/2026 at 9:15 a.m., the wall behind R1's bed had a hole measuring approximately 10 inches by 12 inches. This hole was in line with R1's bed frame. On 5/31/2026 at 9:25 a.m., all resident doors on the 200 hallway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent and control the presence of insects within the facility for seven residents (R7, R14, R16, R70, R72, R84, and R94) reviewed for environmental concerns. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility by exposing them to unsanitary environmental conditions and nuisance pests within resident living areas.Findings:The facility's Pest Control policy, effective December/2025, documents the purpose of the pest control program was to prevent or control insects and rodents from spreading disease. The policy further documents the pest control program would be conducted on a regular and as-needed basis, employees were instructed to promptly report observations of pests to their department heads, and the facility was to be maintained in a condition that prevented the harborage or feeding of insects and rodents. This document also states the department…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Failures at this level required more than one deficient practice statement. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect residents' right to a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in resident living and dining spaces. This failure affects 18 of 24 residents (R1, R2, R3, R7, R9, R10, R19, R21, R29, R45, R55, R65, R68, R71, R84, R85, R94, R99) reviewed for environment on the sample list of 47. Findings Include: The Illinois Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program: Resident Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities, last revised November 2018, documents all residents have the right to live in a facility that is safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike. On 5/31/2026 at 10:07 AM R85's room had very dirty floors, garbage under the bed, dirt build up around the edges where the floors meet the walls, marks on the walls, paint scraped off the walls, trash and debris outside of R85's window, the bedside table had built up gunk around all the edges of the table, the closet door was broken, there was base board missing in the bathroom, a strong urine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate regularly with the dialysis center to coordinate resident dialysis care. This failure affects one resident (R5) of one reviewed for dialysis on the sample list of 47.Findings include:The facility's Care Coordination Agreement (2/23/2024) between the facility and their contracted kidney dialysis provider documents For the purposes of care coordination, in advance of each Resident's dialysis treatment, Long Term Care Facility shall furnish all information and documentation necessary for Dialysis Facility to provide safe and appropriate care, including any and all information reasonably requested by Dialysis Facility.R5's Census Sheet (6/2/2026) documents R5 admitted to the facility on [DATE].R5's Medical Diagnosis sheet (6/2/2026) documents diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Embolism And Thrombosis Of Deep Veins of Lower Extremity, Cellulitis, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Osteomyelitis.R5's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent prior to administering psychotropic medications for one (R77) of two residents reviewed for psychotropic medications in the sample list of 47.Findings include:The facility Behavioral Health Services Program, last approved on 03/2025, documents Obtain consent for any new psychotropic medications prior to administration.R77's clinical Physician Orders, printed 5/31/26, documents Olanzapine (antipsychotic) 2.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time daily ordered on 5/27/26, Fluoxetine (antidepressant) 10 mg to be given with Fluoxetine 20mg for a total of 30 mg daily ordered on 5/2/26, Trazodone (antidepressant)150 mg at bedtime ordered on 4/30/26, Clonazepam (benzodiazepine) 1 mg twice daily ordered 4/30/26, and Buspirone (antianxiety) 20 mg twice daily ordered on 4/30/26. R77's Medication Administration Record documents that R77 has received the medication as ordered in May of 2026.R77's medical record did not contain documentation of informed consent for Olanzapine 2.5 mg, Fluoxetine 30 mg, Trazodone 150…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure an accident hazard-free environment and failed to provide safe assistive devices for one resident (R7) reviewed for accidents on a sample list of 47. Findings Include: R7's diagnoses included Complete Paraplegia, Stage Four Pressure Ulcers of the Left and Right Lower Back and Right Hip, Chronic Osteomyelitis, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Cellulitis, and an Unspecified Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury. The care plan documented that R7 had a history of bumping lower extremities on objects while repositioning in bed and required interventions to maintain skin integrity and prevent injury.Review of nursing documentation dated 4/19/2026 at 2:40 PM revealed R7 was found bleeding from the left leg with a large amount of blood present in the room and hallway. R7 stated R7 was attempting to lift R7's left leg with a grabber/reacher and did not realize R7 had cut R7's self. Nursing staff applied pressure, initiated emergency measures, and called 911. Additional nursing documentation indicated R7 became…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a Dementia specific plan of care for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for Dementia Services on the sample list of 47. Findings Include: R2's Medical Diagnoses List dated June 2026 documents R2 is diagnosed with Unspecified Dementia Unspecified Severity with other Behavioral Disturbances. On 6/02/2026 at 11:50 AM V2 confirmed R2 did not have a plan of care related to R2's Dementia diagnosis and R2 should have one. V2 confirmed a Dementia care plan was added on 6/1/26 after surveyor notified the facility there was no Dementia plan of care in R2's medical record.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide staff and resident access to an appropriate handwashing facility for one resident (R14) on contact isolation precautions and failed to implement and practice Enhanced Barrier Precautions for one (R39) of six reviewed for infection control in the sample list of 47 residents. Findings: 1. R14's undated Care Plan documented an admission date of 5/15/2026 and diagnosis of Enterocolitis due to Clostridioides Difficile infection. On 6/1/2026 at 9:14 AM, R14's room had contact isolation signage posted at the entrance. Upon entering the room, a noticeable fecal odor was present. A bedside commode was in the room along with designated receptacles for soiled linen and personal protective equipment (PPE) disposal. Upon removal of PPE, the bathroom door was locked and inaccessible, preventing access to a sink to wash hands. On 6/1/2026 at 9:15 AM, R14 stated R14 was on isolation precautions for suspected Clostridioides Difficile infection (C-Diff). R14 stated the bathroom had been locked by the facility and R14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on Interview and record review the facility failed to employ a full-time Director of Nursing to oversee nursing services, resulting in lack of supervision of nursing staff and inconsistent clinical oversight, which has the potential to affect the health and safety of all 88 residents. Findings include:On 4/23/26 at 09:00AM surveyor requested to interview the Director of Nursing (DON) and was informed by multiple staff members there is no DON at this time. On 5/4/26 at 12:35PM V3, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated the former DON had been terminated on an unknown date and there is currently no DON.On 4/28/26 V1, Administrator, provided a copy of the Facility Assessment that documents the facility will employee one (1) full time Director of Nurses. The Resident Roster dated April 23, 2026 documents 88 residents reside in the facility.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for two of two residents (R4, R5) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of five residents.Findings include:R5's Current Medical Record documents R5 has diagnoses of anxiety disorder, substance abuse disorder, major depressive disorder, oxygen dependence, frontal lobe and executive function deficit, anoxic brain injury, and traumatic brain injury.The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R5 has moderate cognitive impairment.R4's Current Medical Record documents R4 has diagnoses of mood and bipolar disorder.The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R4 has intact cognition.The Final Abuse Investigation dated 4/6/26 documents on 3/29/26 staff reported a resident to resident physical altercation between R4 and R5. The Investigation documents while a nurse was administering medications R5 got upset and angry with the nurse and was yelling and cursing and R4 tried to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to notify the physician of a change of condition for one (R11) of three residents reviewed for injury on the sample list of 16. Findings include:Review of R11's Care Plan dated 08/27/2025 documents an admission date of 08/26/2025. The same Care Plan documents diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications, End Stage Renal Disease, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Chronic Embolism And Thrombosis of Deep Veins of Lower Extremity, Cellulitis, Acquired Absence of Right Foot, Acquired Absence of Left Foot, Osteomyelitis, Mixed Conductive And Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral, Insomnia, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. The same Care Plan documents R11 requires assistance of one to two staff members for ambulation and ADL (Activity of Daily Living) care.On 4/24/26 at 09:30am R11 was laying in the bed with an undated/signed dressing applied to the right lower leg. On 4/24/26 at 10:17am V17, License Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed R11's right lower leg was wrapped with a dressing that did not contain a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain then follow a physicians order for an injury for one (R11) of three reviewed for injuries in the sample list of 16. Review of R11's Care Plan dated 08/27/2025 documents an admission date of 08/26/2025. The same Care Plan documents diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications, End Stage Renal Disease, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Chronic Embolism And Thrombosis of Deep Veins of Lower Extremity, Cellulitis, Acquired Absence of Right Foot, Acquired Absence of Left Foot, Osteomyelitis, Mixed Conductive And Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral, Insomnia, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. The same Care Plan documents R11 requires assistance of one to two staff members for ambulation and ADL care.On 4/24/26 at 09:30am R11 was laying in the bed with an undated/signed dressing applied to the right lower leg.On 4/24/26 at 09:30am R11 stated on an unknown date R11 was bleeding and a nurse applied a dressing to the wound. R11 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have fall precautions in place for four of five (R4, R8, R10 and R11) residents reviewed for accidents in a sample of 24.Findings include:1.On 3/9/2026 at 11:30 AM R4 was lying crosswise on her bed, R4 was unable to rise from her bed, and the call light was not within her reach.R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R4's cognition is moderately impaired.R4's current Care Plan, documents diagnoses of Hallucinations, unspecified and Alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting Dementia. It also documents an intervention on 5/1/2025 of Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it.2.On 3/10/2026 at 10:30 AM, R8 was lying in bed, and his call light was not in reach.R8's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R8 is rarely or never understood.R8's Care Plan, documents diagnoses of Other Seizures and Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity with other behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the shower rooms in a safe and functional condition. This failure has the potential to affect all 94 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:On 12/3/25 at 1:49pm, the facility's shower room on the 100 hall was in a state of disarray. There were loose pieces of tile, a crack in the shower board, floor tile grout dirty with black substance, an orange substance (appears to be rust) along baseboard edges, peeling caulk, and a gray/black fuzzy substance appearing on the caulking on lower shower head wall. These blackened areas were in spotted arrangement with radiating strands and resembled mold. There was a bathtub in this room with hair, boxes of gloves, and a gait belt inside of it.On 12/3/25 at 2:45pm, the facility's shower room on the 400 hall was in a state of disarray. There was approximately two feet of baseboard detached from wall, black substance on caulk, an orange substance (appears to be rust) on the shower board, overall dirty appearing tiles, black substance on areas of floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely laundry services to maintain residents personal clothing in a clean useable condition for six of eighteen residents (R10, R12, R13, R14, R16 and R17) reviewed for Homelike environment.Findings include:On 12/3/25 at 9:50 AM, three clean linen carts observed in laundry room, filled with residents clean laundered clothing awaiting delivery. On 12/4/25 at 9:45 AM, the same three clean linen carts observed in laundry room still awaiting to be delivered. On 12/4/25 at 9:31 AM, R12 stated that it takes a while to get you clothes back, and R12 sometimes goes to laundry and asks to get some clothes. On 12/4/25 at 9:45 AM, V5 Laundry Aide stated there is an issue with missing and late laundry, as you can see both washers and dryers are going, and we have three 55-gallon garbage container, and two laundry carts filled of dirty clothes. V5 stated there is also two carts of clean clothes that have been here since yesterday and need to be delivered to the residents. On 12/4/25 at 9:50 AM, V15 Laundry Aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure linens and windowsills were clean and free from cobwebs and dirt for one of four residents (R5) reviewed for housekeeping on the sample list of six. Findings Include: R5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with (Acute) Exacerbation and Essential (Primary) Hypertension. This assessment documents R5 as cognitively intact. On 10/14/25 at 10:30 AM, dusty hanging cobwebs holding insects were accumulated all along the windowsill next to R5's bed. R5 was lying in bed watching television. Particles of dirt were on the top of the linens on R5's bed. On 10/14/2025 at 1:54 PM, V11 Housekeeping Supervisor walked into R5's room. V11confirmed the presence of the dusty hanging cobwebs holding insects that had accumulated all along the windowsill next to R5's bed. V11 stated R5's room needed to be cleaned better, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, Interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, comfortable environment by providing inadequate supplies of toilet paper for residents and failing to maintain communal shower floors in a safe sanitary manner. This failure has the potential to affect all 92 residents who reside in the facility.Findings Include:The facility's daily census dated 8/19/25 documents 92 residents reside at the facility.On 8/19/25 at 11:28AM, R2 stated They have been out of toilet paper more than once. I keep some extra, so I have some. R2 had two rolls of toilet paper in his drawer. On 8/19/25 at 11:15AM, R1 stated for several days last week I had to have family members bring me some (toilet paper) or I would have been without toilet paper. On 8/19/25 at 11:35AM, R3 stated we ran out of toilet paper last week. We had to use whatever we could like napkins and tissues. We went days like that. It just made me feel disrespected and ignored. On 8/20/25 at 12:30PM, V5 (CNA) Certified Nurse's Aide and V6 CNA verified there was a shortage of toilet paper a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe home like comfortable environment for three residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for safe homelike environment in a sample list of three residents.Findings Include:R1's current diagnosis list includes the following diagnoses: Chronic Neuropathy, Anxiety, and Major Depression.MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/30/25 documents R1 is cognitively intact.On 8/19/25 at 11:15 AM, R1 was in her bed watching TV. The windowsill was covered in dust, dead spiders, and ants. The edge of the baseboard in R1's bathroom was crusted with brown debris and there was an odor of urine present. R1 stated there had been no toilet paper for several days last week. R1 stated I had to get family to bring me toilet paper, or I would have been without toilet paper. R1 stated there are ants in here all the time they crawl on the walls and the window.R2's current diagnosis list includes the following diagnosis: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Congestive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, Interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate pest control when ants were observed for one (R1) of three reviewed for pest control on the total sample of five. Findings include:The facility census report dated 8/19/25 documents 92 residents reside at the facility.R1's current diagnosis list includes the following diagnoses: Chronic Neuropathy, Anxiety, and Major Depression.MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/30/25 documents R1 is cognitively intact.On 8/19/25 at 11:15 AM, R1 was in her bed watching TV. The windowsill was covered in dust, dead spiders, and ants. R1 stated there are ants in here all the time they crawl on the walls and the window.R2's current diagnosis list includes the following diagnosis: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, Diabetes, Anxiety, and Depression.R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/19/25 documents R2 is cognitively intact.On 8/19/25 at 11:28 AM, R2 was sitting up in his room in a wheelchair. The windowsills in R2's room were covered with dust and dead insects. R2 stated there are ants in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse. This failure resulted in R2 shoving R1 on the shoulders and a second incident of R2 slapping R1 on the head. This failure affects two residents (R1, R2) of three reviewed for abuse in the sample of five. Findings include: The facility Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy (September, 2024) documents: This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. R1's Medical Diagnosis list (6/13/2025) documents R1's diagnoses include: Metabolic Encephalopathy (brain dysfunction resulting from metabolic problems), Major Depressive Disorder, and Severe Dementia. R1's Resident Assessment (5/8/2025) documents R1 has severely impaired cognition. R1's psychiatry notes (5/8/2025) document R1 resides on a locked dementia unit in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and document allegations of resident-to-resident physical abuse. This failure affects two residents (R1, R2) of three reviewed for abuse in the sample of five. Findings include: The facility Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy (September, 2024) documents the facility will implement systems to promptly and aggressively investigate all reports and allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property and mistreatment, and make the necessary changes to prevent future occurrences. The same policy documents the facility final investigation report will contain the following: name, age, diagnosis, and mental status of the resident who was allegedly abused, neglected, exploited, mistreated, or from whom property was misappropriated; the original allegation (noting the day, time, location, specific allegation, alleged perpetrator, witnesses to the occurrence, circumstances surrounding the occurrence, and any noted injuries); a summary of facts determined during the process of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to fully document the details of resident-to-resident physical abuse allegations and investigations in residents' medical records. This failure affects two residents (R1, R2) of three reviewed for abuse in the sample of five. Findings include: 1. The facility abuse investigation file (5/27/2025) documents R2 approached V3 (Certified Nurse Aide) in the facility hallway on 5/19/2025 and requested V3 to remove R1 from the room R1 and R2 were sharing as roommates because R1 was allegedly urinating onto the floor. The same record documents V3 and R2 returned to R2's room where R1 was located followed by an altercation occurring between R1 and R2 and R2 stating to V3 get (R1) out of my room before I beat his (expletive). The investigation documents R2 then shoved R1 on the shoulders with both of R2's hands with R1 stumbling backwards and being intercepted by V3. The investigation file did not document the identity of who reported the allegation to the administrator, if other residents were interviewed about the alleged perpetrator,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment in the dining room for 13 of 18 residents (R1, R3 and R8-R18) reviewed for a homelike environment on the sample list of 18. Findings include: The Facility's Resident Council Minutes dated 3/12/24, document one unknown resident complained that she does not think her room is being mopped or swept daily. On 3/24/25 at 11:38 AM, the garbage can in the small dining room on the 300 hall contained a dirty adult brief, and staff items such as a drinking cup and back pack were on the dining room table. On 3/24/24 at 11:36 AM, V4 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated they normally take the residents (300 Hall Residents) to the small dining room to eat, but it hasn't been cleaned because housekeeping is short on staff, so the residents are eating in their rooms. V4 further stated the 300 hall normally has a housekeeper clean once a week due to lack of housekeeping staff. On 3/24/25 at 1:25 PM, V9 Certified Nursing assistant stated the residents can only use the small dining room (300…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free of physical abuse by another resident for two of five residents (R3, R4) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of nine. Findings include: R3's Facility Census documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following medical diagnoses, Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder and Alcohol Abuse. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score no score due to R3 having severe cognitive impairment and not being able to participate in the interview. R3's Incident Note dated 2/21/25 at 12:05pm documents Staff alleged a physical altercation occurred between R3 and R4. Medical Doctor, R3 and R4's Power of Attorneys, and Ombudsman were notified. R4's Facility Census documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following medical diagnoses, Wernicke's Encephalopathy, Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorder. R4's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency for two of three residents (R3, R4) reviewed for Abuse in the sample of eight. Findings include: R3's Incident Note dated 2/21/25 at 12:05pm documents Staff alleged a physical altercation occurred between R3 and R4. Medical Doctor, R3 and R4's Power of Attorneys, and Ombudsman were notified. R4's Incident Note dated 2/21/25 at 12:05pm documents Staff alleged a physical altercation occurred between R3 and R4. Medical Doctor, R3 and R4's Power of Attorneys, and Ombudsman were notified. The facility's Abuse Investigations and R3 and R4's Electronic Medical Record dated 2-10-25 through 2-20-25 were reviewed and do not include evidence of R4's abuse allegation, that was reported to V8 Previous Administrator on 2/10/25, being reported to the State Agency. The Facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy dated September 2024 documents, Internal Investigation: Any allegation of abuse or any incident that results in serious bodily injury will be reported to the Illinois…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, homelike, and comfortable environment in, shower rooms, resident rooms, and a dining room. These failures affect thirteen residents (R2, R8, R11, and R19 through R28) utilizing the shower room on the 100 Hall, nineteen residents (R4, R6, R7, R10, R12, and R29 through R42) utilizing the shower room on the 300 Hall Dementia Unit, seven residents (R3 and R13 through R18) who usually have meals in the small dining room, one resident (R6) with a hole in the drywall and missing paint in her room, and one resident (R12) with a padded floor mat adhered to the floor by food debris next to her bed. all from a total facility census of 83. Findings include: 1. On 2/18/25 at 2:25 PM, R6's room had an outside corner adjacent to the bathroom door which was missing paint in an area two inches wide by four feet high on both sides of the corner where there had previously been a plastic corner protector, along with a patch of missing paint approximately one foot vertical by seven inches horizontal,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free from mental and emotional abuse. This failure affects one (R1) resident out of three residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 43. Findings include: The facilities Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy effective 9/2024 documents mental abuse is the use of verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes, or has the potential to cause, the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation. When an allegation of abuse, exploitation, neglect, or mistreatment has occurred the Department of Public Health shall be informed by telephone or fax. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 is cognitively impaired. R1 was unable to complete a brief interview for mental status and required a staff assessment indicating R1 experiences inattention and disorganized thinking, long term and short term memory problems, unable to recall staff faces, location of R1's room and the seasons.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report allegations of mental abuse for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of a sample list of 43. Findings include: The facilities Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy effective 9/2024 documents mental abuse is the use of verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes, or has the potential to cause, the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation. When an allegation of abuse, exploitation, neglect, or mistreatment has occurred the Department of Public Health shall be informed by telephone or fax. R1's Comprehensive Incident Fall assessment dated [DATE] at 10:30 PM, documents R1 sustained a witnessed fall coming out of the shower room into the hallway. The Assessment further documents R1 was walking out of the shower room and R1 attempted to grab V13 Certified Nursing Assistant by the neck, V13 blocked R1's hand then R1 tried to grab V13's arm, V13 pulled her arm back and R1 then stumbled into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to wait for a licensed nurse assessment before standing a resident up after a witnessed fall. This failure affects one resident (R1) out of three reviewed for abuse allegations on the sample of 43. Findings include: The Facility's Fall Prevention Program policy revised 5/2022 documents a Fall Assessment will be completed after any fall. R1's Comprehensive Incident Fall assessment dated [DATE] at 10:30 PM documents R1 sustained a witnessed fall coming out of shower room into the hallway. On 2/13/25 at 1:40 PM, V8 Licensed Practical Nurse stated she walked onto the unit as R1 was falling onto the hallway floor. V8 stated that she told V12 and V13 Certified Nursing Assistants that she would be back to assess R1 and to stay with him until she was finished providing care for another resident. V8 stated when she came out into the hallway R1 was no longer laying on the floor and V13 told her that they put R1 to bed and he was fine. V8 further stated when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain residents' privacy while in their rooms from one resident (R1) who has wandering behaviors. This failure has the potential to affect 18 of 20 residents (R3-R20) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 20. Findings include: The Illinois Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Residents' Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities policy dated 11/2018 documents, Your rights to safety: Your facility must be safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike. You have the right to privacy. R1's MDS ((Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents R1 is severely cognitively impaired and exhibits physical, verbal, and other behaviors directed towards others, that puts R1 and others at risk for physical illness or injury, and significantly intrudes on the privacy and activity of others. This same MDS also documents R1 wanders daily, and the wandering significantly intrudes on the privacy or activities of others. R1's Psychiatry Progress Note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement an ongoing program of activities daily and record the residents' attendance and levels of participation in activities, as instructed by the facility's Activities Program policy, for 19 of 20 residents (R1, R3-R20) reviewed for Activities in the sample of 20. Findings include: The facility's Activities Program policy dated 03/2024 documents, Purpose: To provide an ongoing program of activities designated to appeal to the residents' interests and to enhance his or her highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Guidelines: The Activity Director, trained staff, or volunteer will: 1. Identify and involve each resident in an ongoing program of activities that is designed to appeal to his or her interests and needs. 3. A minimum of four-seven organized activities will be scheduled daily. 4. Provide programs for residents who will not, or cannot, effectively plan their own activities pursuits. 5. Provide for residents needing specialized or extended programs to enhance their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident verbal and physical abuse for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for Abuse in the sample of 20. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy dated 09/2024 documents, This facility affirms the right of our resident to be free abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. In order to do so, the facility has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. Abuse means any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon a resident other than by accidental means. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental, and psychosocial well-being. R1's admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to follow their Abuse Policy to update the care plan and implement approaches to safely monitor and increase supervision of a resident with a history of aggressive behaviors to prevent resident-to-resident abuse for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for Abuse in the sample of 20. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy dated 09/2024 documents, This facility affirms the right of our resident to be free abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. In order to do so, the facility has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. Resident Assessment: As part of the resident's life history on the admission assessment, comprehensive care plan, and MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessments, staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-14 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to notify a resident of discharge from facility for one (R2) of one resident in a sample list of four residents reviewed for Facility Discharges. Findings include: The facilities Notice of Transfer and Discharge Policy revised 10/2022 documents prior to discharge the facility will notify the resident of the discharge and the reasons for discharge in writing. The notice of discharge will be made at least 30 days before the resident is transferred or discharged . The facilities undated Resident rights Policy documents before a facility discharges you they must prepare you to be sure your discharge is safe and appropriate. R2's admission Record dated 12/14/24 documents R2 was admitted to the facility 3/8/24 and discharged [DATE]. R2's Physician orders dated 11/27/24 at 3:52 PM, documents R2 no longer needs nursing home care or services. Give medications and explain how to take them. The same order documents V9 Medical Director will no longer follow R2, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient Registered Nursing (RN) hours on two of fifteen days reviewed for RN staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 84 residents in the facility. Findings include: The facility Nursing Daily Schedule (August 21, 2024 through September 4, 2024) document on Wednesday 8/21/24 and Wednesday 8/28/24, the facility scheduled zero (0) hours of RN coverage for a 24 hour period. On 9/4/24 at 1:45pm, V2 Director of Nursing confirmed the hours listed on the facility nursing daily schedule were correct and the facility failed to have RN coverage on 8/21/24 and 8/28/24. The facility Resident Midnight Census dated 9/4/24 documents 84 residents reside in the facility.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a residents right to be free from verbal abuse by a staff member. This failure affects one (R2) of four residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of six. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting Policy dated 8/2023 documents the facility affirms the right of its residents to be free from abuse or mistreatment by staff. Verbal abuse includes the use of oral, written, or gestured communication, or sounds, to residents within hearing distance, regardless of age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples of verbal abuse include, but are not limited to: harassing, mocking, insulting, ridiculing, threatening, and yelling or hovering over a resident with an intent to intimidate. The Abuse Investigation Report dated 8/1/24 documents on 7/27/24 during dinner, R2 asked V3 Dietary Aide if R2 could have something else to eat. V3 told R2 V3 did not make the food and ignored R2. The report further documents V3 said to R2 stop looking at me you fat ugly b (expletive). V6 Receptionist, Abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transfer a resident (R3) with a mechanical lift with two people for one of three residents reviewed for falls in the sample list of three. Findings include: R3's Diagnosis list dated 7/31/24, documents R3's diagnoses as: Muscle Weakness, other abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Difficulty Walking not elsewhere classified, Weakness, Osteoarthritis, unspecified site, and Morbid (severe) Obesity due to excess calories. R3's Clinical Summary dated 3/22/24, documents R3 has unsteady gait requiring supervision, requires substantial/maximal assist of a mechanical lift, and is dependent for chair/bed to chair transfers. R3's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE], documents R3 has had 1-2 falls in the past three months, is chair bound, and not able to perform gait/balance assessment. R3's Care Plan dated 3/22/24, documents R3 requires a mechanical lift with two person assist to transfer between surfaces. R3's Witness Fall Report dated 5/18/24, documents: R3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document resident advance directives in the resident's medical record. This failure has the potential to affect one resident (R53) of 24 residents reviewed for advance directives on the sample list of 39. Findings include: R53's Uniform Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Form was signed by R53's legal guardian on 2/5/2024 and documents R53 does want to be resuscitated during a medical emergency. R53's Care Plan (2/1/2024) documents R53's code status as Full Code. R53's Physician Orders (3/21/2024) document R53's code status as DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). On 3/25/24 at 12:04pm, V9 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated staff look in a resident's electronic medical record under Advanced Directives to view the resident's POLST in order to check code status. On 3/25/24 at 1:03pm, V11 MDS Coordinator stated R53's care plan has not been updated to reflect R53's change of code status. The facility's Advance Directives policy (3/2024) documents copies of the resident's Advanced Directive shall be made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete resident comprehensive assessments. This failure affects one resident (R31) of 24 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments on the sample list of 39. Findings include: R31's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R31's weight as 182 lbs (pounds). R31's MDS dated [DATE] documents R31's weight as 164 lbs. This same record further documents, Yes, not on a prescribed weight-loss regimen under weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in the last 6 months. R31's MDS dated [DATE] documents documents R31's weight as 164 lbs. This same record further documents, Yes, not on a prescribed weight-loss regimen under weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in the last 6 months. R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents R31's weights as follows: 9/1/23 - 166 lbs; 12/1/23 - 164 lbs; 3/1/24 - 168.5 lbs. On 3/25/24 at 3:44pm, V12 Dietary Manager stated V12 obtained R31's weights…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify and report significant weight loss to the family and physician for one (R74) of four residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample list of 39. Findings include: R74's Facility Census documents R74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following medical diagnoses: Non-Surgical Spiral Fracture of Shaft of Humerus Left Arm, Dementia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy, Spondylosis, Acute Cystitis with Hematuria, Abnormalities of Gait and Balance, Lack of Coordination, Weakness, Difficulty in Walking, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Visual Hallucinations, Overactive Bladder, Major Depressive Disorder, Urinary Tract Infection, HTN, Hyperlipidemia, Repeated Falls, and Homicidal Ideations. R74's Care Plan dated 2/7/24 documents the following: R74 is at increased nutritional risk for nutritional risk related to Depression, Hypertension, Type 2 diabetes, and dementia. Goal: Tolerate diet as ordered. Maintain current weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse by another resident. This failure affects two of three residents (R1, R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of eight. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting - Illinois with a review date of August, 2024 documents, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. The facility's Final Abuse Investigation Report dated 2/1/24 documents the Conclusion and Action Taken as V7 Licensed Practical Nurse was notified of an alleged physical altercation between R1 and R2. R2 reported that R1 thought R2 was making fun of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report a resident fall to the resident's representative for one (R3) of three residents reviewed for falls in the sample list of nine. Findings include: R3's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R3 has short and long term memory impairment. R3's Nursing Note dated 11/25/23 at 8:00 AM documents R3 was found on the floor of the common bathroom and R3's physician was notified. There is no documentation in R3's medical record that R3's Power of Attorney (V4) was notified of the fall. R3's Fall Investigation for fall on 11/25/23 at 7:57 AM, provided by V2 Director of Nursing, does not document V4 was notified of the fall. On 12/11/23 at 12:17 PM V2 stated the nurse is responsible for notifying the physician and resident's family of falls, and this should be documented in a progress note and/or the incident report. V2 confirmed there is no documentation V4 was notified of R3's fall on 11/25/23. The facility's Physician-Family Notification-Change in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to include antiplatelet medication use and monitoring for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for falls in the sample list of nine. Findings include: R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R1 receives an antiplatelet. R1's November 2023 Medication Administration Record documents R1 receives Plavix (antiplatelet, blood thinning medication) 75 Milligrams by mouth once daily as of 10/11/22. R1's Care Plan revised on 11/28/23 does not document Plavix use and interventions for monitoring for side effects/complications of this medication. On 12/11/23 at 1:26 PM V2 Director of Nursing stated blood thinning medications should be care planned with interventions of monitoring for side effects. V2 confirmed R1's care plan does not address Plavix use and interventions for monitoring.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify, document/assess, address, and report a change in condition for one (R5) of three residents reviewed for death in the sample list of nine. Findings include: On [DATE] at 12:06 PM V9 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated V9 remembers R5 was doing a lot of mumbling before R5 passed, and when R5 admitted to the facility R5 was talking clearly. On [DATE] at 11:59 AM V9 stated V9 noticed R5's speech changes while in the dining room with R5. V9 stated V9 talked to other unidentified CNAs and nurses who were aware of the changes in R5's speech. On [DATE] at 2:36 PM V22 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated V22 recalls R5, R5 was alert and oriented, and V22 last saw R5 two days prior to R5's death. V22 described R5 as being fine that day and was shocked to hear of R5's passing. On [DATE] at 2:53 PM V23 Registered Nurse stated V23 had taken care of R5, R5 was staying in bed a lot and R5 had two falls. V23 stated the week prior to R5's death, V23 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer a seizure medication as ordered resulting in a significant medication error for one (R4) of three residents reviewed for medications in the sample list of nine. Findings include: R4's Hospital After Visit Summary dated 2/2/23 includes an order for Phenytoin (seizure medication) Extended Release 200 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice daily. R4's Hospital Records dated 2/2/23 at 2:04 PM documents one dose of Phenytoin was administered on 2/2/23. R4's admission assessment dated [DATE] documents R4 admitted to the facility at 4:45 PM. R4's February 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) does not document Phenytoin was initiated until 2/3/23. There is no documentation that R4 received the evening dose of Phenytoin or that the facility communicated with the physician, hospital, or pharmacy regarding this dose. On 12/11/23 at 12:17 PM V2 Director of Nursing stated the hospital sends a referral packet prior to the resident's admission. V2 stated if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete weekly wound assessments and obtain a physician order for wound treatment for one (R1) resident out of three residents reviewed for wounds in a sample list of three residents. Findings include: R1's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction, Diabetes Mellitus Type II , Atherosclerosis of Left Leg Native Arteries, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Left Non-Dominant side, Essential Hypertension, Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Repeated Falls, Neuralgia and Neuritis. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 as having moderately impaired cognition. This same MDS documents R1 as requiring substantial/maximal assistance for toileting, dressing, personal hygiene, moderate assistance for bed mobility and that R1 uses a wheelchair for mobility. R1's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated November 2023 documents physician orders starting 10/23/23 to cleanse R1's Left Great Toe skin tear…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent potential cross contamination during wound care for one (R2) resident out of three residents reviewed for wound care in a sample list of three residents. Findings include: R2's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses of Cerebrovascular Disease, Vascular Dementia, Anemia, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Palliative Care, and Wound on Right Hip. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 as severely cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R2 as dependent on staff for assistance with toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and bed mobility. R2's Care Plan instructs staff to use two people to assist R2 in bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. R2's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated November 2023 documents a physician order starting 9/19/23 to cleanse R2's Right Hip wound with wound cleanser, apply half strength bleach solution soaked gauze and apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse for eight consecutive hours seven days per week. This failure has the potential to affect all 84 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 10/13/23, 10/17/23, and 10/18/23, there were 24 residents residing on the facility's 300 hall memory care unit, requiring a high level of supervision. There were three residents placed on transmission based precautions requiring nursing management. There were two residents who received dialysis treatments also requiring nursing management. The facility's Daily Nurse Staffing Schedule, dated from 9/24/23 through 10/17/23 documented six days when the registered nurse hours did not meet the requirement for eight consecutive hours seven days per week. On 9/25/23 the registered nurse worked a total of five hours from 7:00 PM until midnight. On 9/26/23 there was one registered nurse working seven hours from midnight until 7:00 AM, and one registered nurse working another five hours from 7:00 PM until midnight, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident. This failure affects one resident (R4) out of four reviewed for abuse on the sample of 22. Findings include: The facility's Preliminary 24 hour Abuse Investigation Report (Initial Report) to The Illinois Department of Public Health dated 10/12/23 documents an allegation of physical abuse with R5 as the alleged aggressor and R4 as the alleged victim. R5's Census Detail dated 10/18/23 documents R5 was admitted to the facility 5/22/17. R5's Diagnoses List dated 10/18/23 documents R5 experiences conditions including Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type, Anxiety, Major Recurrent Depression, and a history of Traumatic Brain Injury. R5's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R5 received a score of 8 out of a possible 15 for a Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating moderate cognitive impairment for R5. R5's Nurses Notes of various dates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post signage to indicate isolation precautions and failed to use appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for one of three residents (R5) reviewed for COVID 19 (Human Coronavirus SARS CoV2) in a sample list of six residents. Findings Include: The facility's infection control policy states Residents with suspected or confirmed COVID 19 infection: Health Care Personnel who enter the room of a resident with suspected or confirmed SARS CoV2 infection should adhere to standard precautions and use a NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) approved particulate respirator with N95 filters or higher, gown, gloves, and eye protection (i.e. goggles or a face shield that covers the front and sides of the face). R5's progress note dated 7/30/2023 at 5:33PM document rapid COVID test done with positive result DON (Director of Nursing) and son notified. On 8/1/23 at 10:00AM V6 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was at the nurse's station. R5's door was closed, but there were no signs in place to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$132,974 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 3 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $87,009 — penalty dated 2025-10-15
- $31,772 — penalty dated 2024-03-27
- $14,193 — penalty dated 2023-11-29
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-06-04 for 50 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-11-13 for 34 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-19 for 5 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ARCADIA CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BM EQUITIES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 10/01/2020 |
| CLARK, SARAH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2020 |
| SCHROEDER, KIMI | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2020 |
| MCCLURE, MICHELLE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2020 |
| SEITLER, DOVID | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2020 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2020 |
| ARCADIA CARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/04/2025 |
| KUREISHY, FARRUKH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2020 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2020 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2020 |
| WILLIAMS, NATHINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2020 |
| BERKOWITZ, DAVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/08/2025 |
| MEYSTEL, YOSEF | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/08/2025 |
| ARCADIA BLOOMINGTON PROPCO, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/04/2025 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2020 |
| DAVID A BERKOWITZ DELTA TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2020 |
| YOSEF MEYSTEL DELTA TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $821K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145371. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.