No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Edith Lane of Cincinnati

2586 Lafeuille Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45211 · For profit - Corporation · 167 certified beds · (513) 662-2444 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (513) 662-2444 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations$159,338 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $159,338 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-03)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Airrosti0.7 mi
2323 Ferguson Rd · (800) 404-6050 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2322 Ferguson Rd · (513) 922-8441 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2322 Ferguson Rd · (513) 607-9003 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3001 Queen City Ave · (513) 389-0637

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.9%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.3%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.2%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms18.2%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%6.1%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.4%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.4%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.6%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.4%8.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication10.0%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine12.0%75.6%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.691.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.921.801.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 6.7–17.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.811.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.26
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 167 beds and averages 142.2 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-16)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

72 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, observation, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to adequately assess residents' skin and failed to ensure adequate care and services were provided to residents to prevent the development and worsening of pressure ulcers. This resulted in Actual Harm for Resident #135 when the facility staff failed to adequately assess the resident's skin and failed to implement timely interventions for a pressure ulcer until the ulcer reached an advanced stage. Actual Harm also occurred for Resident #01 when the facility staff failed to assess the resident's skin and the resident developed an unstageable pressure to the right heel caused by a removable splint device. This affected two (Residents #135 and #01) of the three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 128. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #135 revealed an admission date of 03/18/24 with diagnoses including muscle weakness, need for assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility's investigation, review of witness statements, review of the hospital records, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident-to-resident abuse. This resulted in Actual Harm on 05/31/24 when Resident #52, a resident with a known history of aggressive behaviors towards other residents, intentionally ran over Resident #14 with his wheelchair. Subsequently, Resident #14 was sent to the local hospital where she was diagnosed with a closed fracture of the right tibial plateau initial encounter. The facility also failed to ensure Resident #60 was free from resident- to-resident abuse when Resident #52 intentionally ran into the resident with his wheelchair causing the two residents to become involved in a physical altercation. This affected two (#14 and #60) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 126. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility self-reported incident (SRI), review of facility investigations, observations, staff and resident interviews, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. This resulted in Actual Harm for when Resident #118 was physically abused by Resident #72 and subsequently required hospital evaluation/treatment for a right wrist fracture, and when Resident #117 was physically abused by Resident #95 and subsequently required hospital evaluation/treatment for a broken jaw. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Resident #19 was free from staff-to resident abuse and failed to ensure Resident #41 and #53 were free from resident-to-resident abuse which placed the residents at risk for more than minimal harm that did not result in actual harm to the residents. This affected five (#19, #41, #53, #118, and #117) of 11 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 121. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility had properly operating phones system in place. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. The facility census was 145.Observation of Secured Women's Behavioral Unit on 03/18/26 at 11:24 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #182, revealed the phone at the nurses station did not work. Observation of a second phone within the unit revealed it was unplugged and not operational. During an interview on 03/18/26 at 11:24 A.M., CNA #182 verified the Secured Women's Behavioral Unit did not have a working phone. CNA #182 stated if a resident's family member tried calling in, there was no way to reach the staff.Observation of Secured Men's Behavioral Unit on 03/18/26 at 11:31 A.M., with CNA # 319, revealed the phone was not plugged in. Interview at the same time with CNA #319, verified the phone was not operational CNA #319 stated the facility had a lot of issues with the phones working and the phones were often not working. During an interview on 03/18/26 at 11:38…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary, clean, and safe environment, This had the potential to affect all 12 Residents (#01, #02, #03, #04, #05, #06, #07, #08, #09, #10, #11, and #12) who resided on the Secured Women's Behavioral Unit and 34 Residents (#44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73, #74, #75, #76 and #77) who resided on the One [NAME] Unit and utilized the main entrance. The facility census was 145.1) Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 02/09/24. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), essential primary hypertension, hypothyroidism, schizoaffective disorder, osteoarthritis, and osteoarthritis.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #12 dated 12/30/25, revealed she had impaired cognition,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe smoking environment. This had the potential to affect all 12 Residents (#01, #02, #03, #04, #05, #06, #07, #08, #09, #10, #11, and #12) who resided on the Secured Women's Behavioral Unit and 34 Residents (#44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73, #74, #75, #76 and #77) who resided on the One [NAME] Unit and utilized the main entrance. The facility census was 145. 1) Observation of the Secured Women's Behavioral Unit on 03/18/26 at 2:08 P.M. with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #182, revealed the door exiting to the smoking area contained numerous discarded cigarette butts lying all over the ground and near the door. The sidewalk leading away from the building contained numerous discarded cigarette butts. During an interview on 03/18/26 at 2:10 P.M., CNA #182 verified the door…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, and comfortable environment. This affected 31 (#682, #86, #127, #120, #122, #147, #146, #99, #134, #140, #142, #125, #136, #137, #128, #121, #138, #145, #123, #133, #135, #130, #124, #131, #148, #149, #144, #126, #129, #132, and #139) of 31 residents reviewed for environment residing in Building #2, and further affected four (#34, #50, #692 and #694) with the potential to affect all residents on the 2 west unit of Building #1. The facility census was 144. 1. Observations of Building #2 on 12/22/25 from 3:45 P.M. to 4:20 P.M. with Maintenance Assistant (MA #333) revealed the following: - Rooms 01, 05, 06, 07, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 did not having curtains or blinds on the ground level windows, affecting 19 Residents (#86, #99, #120, #121, #122, #125, #126, #127, #128, #129, #130, #131, #132, #133, #134, #140, #142, #144, and #145). - Rooms 08, 10, 12, and 14 revealed mold on the top of the window sill…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident call systems were functioning in an appropriate manner. This affected 14 (#103, #69, #91, #95, #17, #27, #43, #87, #51, #58, #107, #18, #88 and #117) of the 25 residents who resided on the secured men's behavioral unit reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 118. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included traumatic brain injury (TBI), kidney cancer, anemia, morbid obesity, hypertension, cerebrovascular accident with left (non-dominant) hemiplegia/hemiparesis, bipolar disease, depression and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #18 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #18 required supervision for eating and was dependent on staff for all other activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation of the facility during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This affected two (#11 and #18) of the seven residents reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility census was 118. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 06/10/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic congestive heart disease, and acute kidney failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #11, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Observation of Resident #11's room on 06/12/25 at 2:00 P.M., with Maintenance Director #200, revealed an air conditioning (AC) unit sitting in an opening in the outer wall. The AC unit did not fit properly in the opening. The sky and the surrounding buildings were visible through the large gap at the top and sides of the wall opening.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store foods in a manner to prevent spoilage and failed to ensure kitchen staff appropriately wore hair restraints while in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 119 residents at the facility. The facility census was 119. Findings Included: 1. Observation on 04/08/25 from 9:50 A.M. through 10:00 A.M. revealed an opened and undated quarter pound package of ham lunch meat, two halved tomatoes wrapped in plastic that were undated, an opened and undated package of yellow cheeses with a quarter pound left, and three ham sandwiches, three bologna sandwiches, and six peanut butter sandwiches individually packaged in plastic bags that were not labeled or dated in refrigerator. Interview on 04/07/25 at 9:58 A.M. with Food Service Director (FSD) #196 verified all the food items were not labeled or dated, and should have been, in the refrigerator. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, dated December 2008, revealed the facility foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, medical record review, review of service reports, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a homelike environment. This affected six (#29, #79, #88, #101, #109, and #118) of 17 residents reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility census was 119. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 06/10/23 and diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic congestive heart disease, and acute kidney failure. Review of Resident #29's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Observation of Resident #29's room on 04/08/25 at 9:47 A.M. revealed an air conditioning unit sitting in an opening in the outer wall. The air conditioning unit did not fit properly in the opening. The sky and other buildings were visible through the gap at the top and sides of the wall opening. A thin plastic window covering was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and resident family interview, staff interview, review of incident reports, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were conducted timely as required and failed to ensure care plans were updated timely when new interventions were implemented. This affected six (#59, #79, #98, #116, #118, and #120) of 32 residents reviewed for care plans. The census was 119. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical records for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 01/27/22 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, bipolar disorder, epilepsy, and schizoid personality disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #79 had mild cognitive impairment. Review of care conference documentation revealed conferences were held for Resident #79 on 03/12/24, 06/07/24, and 10/21/24. There was no documented care conference for the first quarter of 2025. 2. Review of Resident #98's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents. This had the potential to affect five (#31, #54, #79, #84, and #109) of five residents observed in the hallway during medication administration. The facility census was 119. Findings Include: Observation on 04/09/25 at 9:00 A.M., during medication administration, Registered Nurse (RN) #260 was observed to discard two 300 milligram (mg) gabapentin capsules and one five (5) mg memantine tablet into the open trash receptacle on the end of the medication cart. RN #260 left the medication cart locked and unattended on four occasions to administer medications during observation. The medication cart was placed in a common area between the front entrance to the facility and the rehabilitation room. Five (#31, #54, #79, #84 and #109) residents were observed to be in the hallway when the medication cart was left unattended with three unsecured pills in the trash receptacle. Interview with RN #260 on 04/09/25 at 9:11 A.M. confirmed the three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 59 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident call systems were functioning in an appropriate manner. This affected two (#42 and #77) of three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 119. Findings Included: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 11/25/2019. Diagnoses included palliative care, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, borderline personality disorder, brief psychotic disorder, type two diabetes, and adult sexual abuse. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was assessed with mil;d cognitive impairment. Resident #42 required supervision or touching assistance for eating meals. Resident #42 required partial to moderate assistance for dressing the upper body. Resident #42 required substantial maximal assistance for dressing the lower body, putting shoes on and off, personal hygiene, bathing, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident's significant weight loss. This affected one (#116) of eight residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 119. Findings Included: Review of Resident #116's medical record revealed and admission date of 07/31/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and vascular dementia severity with other behavioral disturbance. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #116 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #116 required supervision or touching assistance for meals and dressing the upper body. Resident #116 required partial to moderate assistance for personal hygiene, dressing the lower body, placing shoes on and off the feet, and oral care. Resident #116 required substantial to maximal assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of resident lists, the facility failed to ensure residents received follow-up care for audiology services. This affected one (#10) of six residents reviewed for ancillary services. The facility census was 119. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident # 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, unspecified anxiety disorder, unspecified impulse disorder, pseudobulbar affect, and type II diabetes. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 10 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Resident #10 had adequate hearing with no hearing aids. Review of the care plan dated 01/30/24 revealed Resident # 10 had potential for inability to understand others related to decline in cognitive status. Interventions included to refer for an audiology evaluation as needed. Review of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, interview with local health clinic staff, review of hospital documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to recognize potential hazards related to residents attending community appointments unsupervised an failed to ensure a resident was properly assessed for use of a sit-to-stand lift for transfers. This affected one (#75) of one residents sampled for community appointments and one (#5) of 10 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility census was 119. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 03/24/25. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition, unspecified anxiety disorder, unspecified psychosis, mixed adjustment disorder, psychotic disorder with delusion, and alcohol dependence. Review of the most recent Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide timely assistance for a resident who was dependent for incontinence care. This affected one (#5) of one residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility census was 119. Findings Included: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 04/26/16. Diagnoses included spastic diplegic cerebral palsy, impulse disorder, epilepsy, psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, dementia, intermittent explosive disorder, bipolar two disorder, anxiety disorder, and intellectual disabilities. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #5 required substantial assistance for meals, oral care, dressing the upper body, and personal hygiene. Resident #5 was dependent for putting on and taking off shoes, dressing the lower body, toileting, and bathing. Review of a plan of care dated 01/17/25 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor weights on a consistent basis and failed to address and implement interventions for a resident with significant weight loss in a timely manner. This affected one (#116) of eight residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 119. Findings Included: Review of Resident #116's medical record revealed and admission date of 07/31/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and vascular dementia severity with other behavioral disturbance. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #116 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #116 required supervision or touching assistance for meals and dressing the upper body. Resident #116 required partial to moderate assistance for personal hygiene, dressing the lower body, placing shoes on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain laboratory values as ordered by the physician. This affected three (#5, #116, and #118) of 32 resident medical records reviewed. The facility census was 119. Findings Included: 1. Review of medical records for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 04/26/16. Diagnoses included spastic diplegic cerebral palsy, impulse disorder, epilepsy, psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, dementia, intermittent explosive disorder, bipolar two disorder, anxiety disorder, and intellectual disabilities. Review of a physician order dated 02/19/24 revealed Resident #5 had an order for laboratory tests for a complete blood count (CBC), renal panel, and Dilantin level every February, May, August, and November. Review of a physician order dated 02/19/24 revealed Resident #5 had an order for laboratory tests for fasting lipid panel, liver function test, hemoglobin A1C, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) yearly that was due April. Review of a physician order dated 02/19/24 revealed Resident #5 had an order for laboratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to serve food in a form to to meet resident needs. This affected one (#28) of eight residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 119. Findings Included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, cognitive communication deficit, occlusion and stenosis of the right carotid artery, chronic diastolic heart failure, type two diabetes, atrial fibrillation, anxiety disorder, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 was cognitively intact. Review of the physician order dated 11/04/24 revealed Resident #28 was ordered a regular diet with mechanical soft texture and thin liquids. Review of the care plan dated 04/14/25 revealed Resident #28 required monitoring of intakes, weight, skin, laboratory values, medication, diet tolerance, and to serve the diet as ordered. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing direct care to residents on enhanced barrier precautions. This affected one (#67) of three residents sampled for enhanced barrier precautions. The facility census was 119. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic viral hepatitis C, type II diabetes, morbid obesity, cannabis and other stimulant dependence, unspecified psychoactive substance abuse, unspecified anxiety and mood disorders, paraplegia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Review of a care plan dated 05/08/24 revealed Resident #67 had an indwelling urinary catheter related to a neurogenic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain comfortable air temperatures and failed to provide a homelike environment. This affected 10 (#01, #02, #03, #04, #05, #06, #07, #08, #09, and #10) out of 123 residents that resided at the facility. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Observation of Maintenance Assistant (MA) #631 revealed he was obtaining air temperatures in resident rooms on 01/27/25 at 9:53 A.M. Further observation revealed Resident #02's room was 57.6 degrees Fahrenheit (F), Resident #06's room was 61.7 degrees F, Resident #07's room was 61.8 degrees F and the common shower room on the women's secured unit was 66.5 degrees F. Interview with MA #631 on 01/27/25 at 9:53 A.M. verified the air temperature in Resident #02's room was 57.6 degrees F, the air temperature in Resident #06's room was 61.7 degrees F, the air temperature in Resident #07's room was 61.8 degrees F, and the air temperature in the shower room on the women's secured unit was 66.5 degrees F. MA #631 confirmed the packaged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0914 — pattern
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had full visual privacy as required. This affected nine (#01, #02, #03, #04, #05, #06, #08, #09, and #10) out of 123 residents that resided at the facility. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Observation of the dining room on the women's secured unit on 01/27/25 at 9:53 A.M. revealed Resident #01, Resident #02, Resident #03, Resident #04, Resident #05, Resident #06, Resident #08, Resident #09, and Resident #10 had their beds in the dining room on the women's secured unit. There were not any privacy curtains or barriers between the residents' beds and the beds could be visualized by the entire room. Interview with Resident #02 on 01/27/25 at 10:00 A.M. revealed it was cold in her room and on the women's secured unit. Resident #02 reported she had to sleep in the dining room on the unit due to the air temperatures. Interview with Resident #08 on 01/27/25 at 10:10 A.M. revealed she had to sleep in the dining room for approximately one week with all the other residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility policy, and review of online guidelines per the American Heart Association (AHA), the facility failed to administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) per the facility policy and per professional standards of care. This affected one (Resident #132) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 128 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #132 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, dementia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, metabolic encephalopathy, morbid obesity and schizophrenia. Resident #132 expired in the facility on [DATE]. Review of the care plan for Resident #132 dated [DATE] revealed the resident's code status was full code. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #132 dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately impaired for decision making and required staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement timely care and treatment for trauma wounds. This affected one (Resident #64) of three residents reviewed for skin impairment. The facility census was 129 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 11/12/23 with diagnoses including multiple myeloma, chronic respiratory failure, malignant neoplasm of brain, and hypertension. Review of the hospital continuity of care (COC) form for Resident #64 dated 09/09/24 revealed the resident had an order to cover the left lower leg wound with Mepilex border and change every three days and as needed for drainage. Resident #64 was to follow-up with the wound care clinic on 09/13/24. Review of the progress note for Resident #64 dated 09/09/24 at 3:55 P.M. revealed the resident was readmitted from the hospital with an open area to the left leg. Review of the wound clinic progress note for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement timely care and treatment for pressure ulcers. This affected one (Resident #64) of three residents reviewed for skin impairment. The facility census was 129 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 11/12/23 with diagnoses including multiple myeloma, chronic respiratory failure, malignant neoplasm of brain, and hypertension. Review of the admission skin assessment dated for Resident #64 dated 09/09/24 revealed the resident was readmitted from the hospital with an unstageable pressure ulcer to the left lower leg. Review of the wound clinic progress note for Resident #64 dated 09/13/24 revealed the resident had an unstageable pressure ulcer to the left lower leg and orders were given to complete dressing changes daily. Review of the physician's order for Resident #64 revealed an order dated 09/17/24 revealed to cleanse the pressure ulcer to the left lower leg with normal saline, apply Medihoney and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below five percent. The medication error was eight percent (%) with two errors out of 25 medication opportunities observed. This affected one (Resident #61) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 129 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 06/07/24 with diagnoses including acute hepatitis C, hypertension, and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #61 dated 08/19/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required partial assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the physician's orders for Resident #61 revealed orders dated 06/07/24 for vitamin D3 oral tablet 25 micrograms (mcg) once per day and Entresto 24-26 mg two times per day. Observation on 10/16/24 at 9:50 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #21 did not administer Entresto 24-26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, staff interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of facility investigation records, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. This affected one (Resident #25) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 128 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed the resident an admission date of 08/02/24 with diagnoses including dementia with other behavioral disturbances, Alzheimer's disease, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #25 dated 08/09/24 revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and had physical, verbal, and other behaviors which put the resident and others at significant risk for injury. Review of the care plan for Resident #25 revised on 08/08/24 revealed the resident was verbally combative with staff, hit staff, and head-butted staff.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate catheter care for residents with an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one (Resident #57) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheter use. The facility census was 128 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 08/13/24 with diagnoses including extradural and subdural abscess, hepatitis C, paraplegia, congenital malformation of the brain, psychoactive substance abuse, hypertension, depression, sepsis, chronic pain, chronic migraine without aura. Review of physician's orders for Resident #57 revealed an order dated 08/15/24 for staff to straight catheterize the resident as needed every eight hours. If the resident has not voided, reinsert indwelling catheter. There were no physician orders for foley catheter care. Review of the nurse progress note for Resident #57 dated 08/17/24 timed at 7:22 P.M. revealed the nurse changed the resident's indwelling urinary catheter and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital discharge record, observation, resident interviews and staff interview the facility failed to provide needed and timely therapy services to residents. This affected one (Resident #57) of three residents reviewed for therapy services. The facility census was 128 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 08/13/24 with diagnoses including extradural and subdural abscess, hepatitis C, paraplegia, congenital malformation of the brain, psychoactive substance abuse, hypertension, depression, sepsis, chronic pain, chronic migraine without aura. Review of hospital discharge records for Resident #57 dated 08/13/24 revealed per hospital therapy notes, the resident was required to wear a thoracic-lumbar-sacral orthosis (TLSO) due to a recent thoracic spine surgery conducted while the resident was in the hospital. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #57 dated 08/20/24 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an operational call light system which would allow for residents to alert staff of their individual needs. This affected one (Resident #57) of five residents reviewed for functioning call lights. The facility census was 128 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 08/13/24 with diagnoses including extradural and subdural abscess, hepatitis C, paraplegia, congenital malformation of the brain, psychoactive substance abuse, hypertension, depression, sepsis, chronic pain, chronic migraine without aura. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #57 dated 08/20/24 revealed the resident had minimal cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for all care. Observation on 08/27/24 at 11:45 A.M. revealed Resident #57's call light was not operational. There was no bell or alternative device for Resident #57 to use in order to summon staff assistance. Interview on 08/27/24 at 11:45 A.M. with Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received therapy services as evaluated by the therapy department and ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#900) out of three residents reviewed for therapy services. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Review of Resident #900's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses including muscle weakness, malignant neoplasm of right kidney, mixed hyperlipidemia, hypertension, syncope and collapse, type two diabetes mellitus without complications and hypothyroidism. Resident #800 discharged from the facility on 05/26/24. Review of Resident #900's physician order dated 04/16/24, revealed an Occupational Therapy (OT) evaluation was completed, and an order was put in place to treat the resident up to five times in thirty days. Review of Resident #900's physician order dated 04/16/24, revealed Resident #900 was to ordered to receive Physical Therapy (PT) five times over four weeks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview,record review,review of the weather via website www.timeanddate.com, and facilities policy review, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable environment for 40 Residents in Building One when temperatures were below 71 degrees Fahrenheit for 15 hours. This affected all residents in Building One, (Residents #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10,#11,#12,#13,#14,#15,#16,#17,#18,#19,#20,#21,#22,#23,#24,#25,#26,#27,#28,#29,#30,#31,#32,#33,#34,#35,#36,#37,#38,#39 and #40). The total facility census was 140. Findings include: Review of facility temperature logs for Building One revealed no recorded temperatures for Building One housing 40 residents, (Residents #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10,#11,#12,#13,#14,#15,#16,#17,#18,#19,#20,#21,#22,#23,#24,#25,#26,#27,#28,#29,#30,#31,#32,#33,#34,#35,#36,#37,#38,#39 and #40) for 01/17/24 6:15 P.M. through 01/18/24 at 10:00 A.M. Review of temperature log dated 01/18/24 at 10:00 A.M. revealed in the Building One the temperature was 55.5 degrees Fahrenheit and at 11:00 A.M. the temperature was 57.5 degrees Fahrenheit.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to have use of a telephone where calls could be made in privacy. This affected three residents (#30, #74, and #125) of three residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 136 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #125 revealed an admission date of 08/15/22 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, major depressive disorder, and epilepsy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment 3.0 dated 07/14/23 for Resident #125, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with activities of daily living. (ADLs.) Observation of the first floor [NAME] Unit on 09/07/23 at 10:10 A.M., revealed there was a telephone at the nurse's station and at the reception desk. Both telephones were open to the common area for residents, staff, and visitors and did not allow for privacy with phone calls. Interviewwith Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-01 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on employee record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide annual evaluations to State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNA's). Additionally, the facility failed to provide the annual 12 hours of in-services to STNA's. This had the potential to affect all 121 residents residing in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 121 residents residing in the facility. The in-house facility census was 121. Findings include: 1. Review STNA #95's employee record revealed STNA #95 was hired on 10/15/19 and had no annual evaluations. Further review of STNA #95's employee file revealed it contained no documentation regarding the required annual 12 hours of in-services. Interview on 11/22/22 at approximately 2:00 P.M. with Regional Human Resources Business Partner (RHRBP) #205 verified STNA #95 did not have an annual evaluation. RHRBP #205 verified STNA #95 did not have the required annual 12 hours of in-services. 2. Review of STNA #132's employee record revealed STNA #132 was hired on 10/15/19 and had no annual evaluations. Further review of STNA #132's employee file…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy/procedure review, the facility failed to label, date, and discard expired food items from the walk-in refrigerator and freezer. In addition, the facility failed to maintain food storage in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 121 residents. The facility census was 121. Findings include: On 11/14/22 at 9:35 A.M. revealed a tour of the kitchen was completed with the Dietary Director (DD) #108. During the observation the following concerns were observed and the concerns below were verified by the DD #108. a) In the refrigerator there was a stainless-steel rectangular container with cooked apples without a date or a use by date. b) In the refrigerator there was a large bowl of salad without a date or a use by date. c) In the refrigerator there were six egg omelets in plastic without a date or a use by date. d) In the refrigerator there was a smoked ham in a plastic bag without a date or a use by date. e) In the refrigerator there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean comfortable and homelike environment. This affected 45 Residents (#3, #6, #7, #10, #11, #12, #13, #22, #25, #32, #35, #37, #38, #39, #43, #45, #46, #55, #61, #63, #64, #66, #69, #73, #74, #76, #77, #78, #81, #84, #85, #88, #89, #93, #98, #100, #101, #102, #103, #108, #112, #113, #117, #121 and #325) of 121 residents reviewed for a homelike environment. The facility census was 121. Findings include 1. Observation on 11/14/22 at 11:21 A.M., revealed Resident #22's window curtains on left had brown stains that looked as it was burnt. There was a hole observed in Resident #22's room behind the door with the size of doorknob exposing plaster. 2. Observation on 11/14/22 at 11:53 A.M., revealed Resident #85's window drapes were soiled at the bottom with brown stains covering it. Resident #85's walls near bathroom were stained with coffee drippings dried up on wall. 3. Observation on 11/14/22 at 12:07 P.M., of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident representative interviews and policy review, the facility failed to have the quarterly care conferences with residents, the residents representative or with the interdisciplinary team. Additionally, the facility failed to review and revise residents plan of care when there was a change in the residents condition/interventions. This affected six (##13, #88, #101, #57, #97 and #117) out of 37 residents reviewed for care conferences and care planning. The facility census was 121. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to schizoaffective disorder, cirrhosis of liver, mood disorder, dementia, unspecified psychosis, psoriasis, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/04/22, revealed the resident was moderately impaired and resident required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, ambulation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure hazardous chemicals were securely stored out of the reach of confused and independently mobile residents. This had the potential to affect nine (#57, #58, #21, #6, #54, #23, #40, #71 and #5) residents identified by the facility as cognitively impaired and independently mobile. The facility census is 121. Findings include Observation on 11/14/22 at 1:30 P.M. of the secured unit revealed residents ambulating in the hallways, in and out of rooms and interacting with staff. Observation on 11/14/22 at 1:38 P.M. of unlocked shower room revealed a revealed a container labeled Sani-wipes sitting on a cabinet shelf hanging on the wall. Further review of container revealed a precautionary statement alerting user that product is hazardous to humans and animals. Product causes substantial but temporary eye damage and avoid contact with skin. Additionally, the label revealed an action for first aid was to call poison control. If eye exposure rinse eye for 15 to 20 minutes. If exposure to skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents taking psychotropic medications had documentation for routine monitoring of behaviors and effectiveness of psychotropic medications. This affected five (#19, #42, #90, #6, and #117) of five residents sampled for psychotropic medications. The facility census was 121. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included but ere not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, unspecified schizoaffective disorders, type II diabetes, generalized anxiety disorder, unspecified major depressive disorder, unspecified personality disorder, and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Resident #19 was a one-person assist and required supervision with all ADL's. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were prepared properly, labeled, and expired medications were disposed of. This had the potential to affect one resident (#31) whose medications were prepared and not given, four residents (#17, #62, #24, and #106) whose insulin injection pens were not correctly labeled, and two residents (#71 and #77) whose prescribed stock medications were expired. The facility census was 121. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #31 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified schizoaffective disorder, type II diabetes, borderline personality disorder, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 was cognitively intact, had both physical and verbal behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #31 had routine medications including amlodipine (can treat high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-01 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the call system was functioning on a secured unit to allow residents to call for staff assistance. This affected three rooms (#408, #410 and #418) out of 8 rooms with two residents occupying each room reviewed for operational call lights. The facility census was 121. Findings include: Observation on 11/14/22 from 10:00 A.M., to 12:00 P.M., revealed the call light was activated inside room [ROOM NUMBER] where two residents resided. The light inside the room was active, however the light outside of the room was not signaling the light was activated. Registered Nurse (RN) #35 verified the call light findings in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Interview on 11/14/22 at 12:27 P.M., the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Unit Manager #58 and RN #35 reported the residents on the 400 unit came to the nurses station when they need something. Observation on 11/15/22 from 10:29 A.M. to 11:30 A.M., revealed the call lights were activated in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 418…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided during perineal care. This affected one (#97) of one resident reviewed for personal hygiene. The facility census was 121. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #97 revealed an admission date of 06/06/22, with diagnoses including: Parkinson's disease, dementia with behaviors, gout, anxiety disorders, history of falling, hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #97, dated 10/19/22, revealed a severely impaired cognition. Resident #97 was coded as experiencing behaviors that do not fluctuate. Resident #97 required extensive assist with bed mobility, transfers, eating, and toileting. Review of the plan of care for Resident #97 dated 06/22/22 revealed resident has an activity of daily living (ADL) self care performance deficit related to Parkinson's disease and requires staff assistance for completion of ADL tasks. Interventions include assistance of one to two staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-01 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A record review revealed Resident #62 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses include anxiety, hypertensive heart and kidney disease, epilepsy, diabetes, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and depression. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 has no cognitive deficits, requires extensive assistance with toileting, transfers, bed mobility, with total dependence with personal hygiene, dressing and is incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of health status note dated 09/29/22 revealed Resident #62 with complaints of shortness of breath and a headache, upon assessment it was noted Resident #62 was having difficulty breathing with exertion in between communication. Vitals signs as follows: blood pressure 156/62, pulse 26, oxygen saturation 94% on room air, respirations 28 and temperature 98.2 with wheezing noted in bilateral lung upon auscultation. Resident #62 was sent to hospital via stretcher and the Director of Nursing (DON) was informed. Review of health status note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, hospice staff interview, review of the hospice contract, and review of the hospice policy, the facility failed to designate a staff member for the collaboration of care and services. This affected one resident (#57) out of one reviewed for hospice services. This has the potential to affect five residents (#56, #57, #50, #97, #38) the facility identified as hospice clients. The facility census was 121. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 12/08/17. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, covid-19, urinary tract infection, schizophrenia, hypertension. polyarthritis, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #57 required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, eating, toilet use and bathing. Resident #57 was coded as receiving hospice services. Review of the plan of care for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-10-28 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespread
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, review of job description and staff interview, the facility failed to have a Licensed Social Worker (LSW) employed on a full-time basis. This had the potential to affect all 135 residents of the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #352 revealed the LSW was fired on 09/19/19 for not meeting the requirements of her job duties. Review of the personnel file for Qualified Social Worker (SW) #353 revealed the SW quit without notice on 10/04/19. Review of the job description for the Social Services Director revealed the general purpose was to provide for each resident's social, emotional and psychological needs and the continuing development of resident's full potential during his/her stay at the facility and to assist in the planning of his/her discharge. Interview on 10/22/19 at approximately 11:15 A.M. with the Administrator verified that there was no LSW employed at the facility since 10/04/19, and the facility's bed capacity was 199. Subsequent interview with the Administrator at 8:35 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-10-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting minutes and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate plans of action were in place to correct any identified quality deficiencies. This had the potential affect all 135 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of QAPI meeting minutes dated 11/01/17 through 04/30/18 revealed the meeting minutes covered falls, behaviors, and medications. There was no evidence of any sign in sheets for the meetings, nor documentation of any other QAPI meetings being conducted. There was no evidence of any plans of action in place to correct any identified quality deficiencies. Interview on 10/28/19 at 12:25 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility was unable to find any completed plans of action or evidence of any QAPI meeting since 04/30/18. The DON stated when she began working at the facility less than a month ago she was shown the binder and it was very full at that time, however she was uncertain where the documentation was.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-10-28 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting minutes and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly QAPI meetings were being conducted. This had the potential to affect all 135 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of QAPI meeting minutes dated 11/01/17 through 04/30/18 revealed the meeting minutes covered falls, behaviors, and medications. There was no evidence of any sign in sheets for the meetings, nor documentation of any other QAPI meetings being conducted. Interview on 10/28/19 at 12:25 P.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was no evidence the facility had sign in sheets for the meetings held between 11/01/17 through 04/30/18, nor was there any evidence of any other QAPI meetings being conducted.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-28 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to issue the Notice to Medicare Provider Non-coverage (NOMNC) form and Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) forms when required. This affected five (#40, #41, #42, #239 and #240) of six residents reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification Review. The facility census was 135. Findings include: Review of the Beneficiary Notices revealed Resident #40 did not receive a NOMNC and SNFABN notification when services ended on 09/25/19. Resident #40 had skilled days remaining at the time the skilled services ended on 09/25/19. Further review revealed Resident #41, #42, #239 and #240 did not receive the SNFABN forms when skilled services were stopped. Resident #41, #42, #239 and #240 had skilled days remaining at the time skilled services ended and remained in the facility. Interview on 10/23/19 at 2:07 P.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #122 verified that the facility was not issuing NOMNC and SNFABN forms. The BOM verified Resident #40 did not receive the NOMNC and SNFABN forms when skilled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-28 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide notice to the resident and /or resident's representative for the reason for transfer and the resident's transfer notices to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. This affected seven (#11, #34, #40, #41, #42, #48 and #108) of seven residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 135. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #42 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, acute kidney failure, congestive heart failure and respiratory failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/25/19, revealed the resident had no cognitive deficits. Review of the health status note, dated 09/07/19 at 9:38 A.M., revealed Resident #42 was experiencing respiratory distress and was sent to local hospital and admitted for an urinary tract infection. 2. Record review for Resident #11 revealed the resident was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-28 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Record review for Resident #108 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included influenza, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, chronic kidney disease, bipolar disorder, and Parkinson's disease. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/23/19, revealed the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the nursing progress notes, dated 08/31/19, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #38 documented the resident was short of breath, had increased weakness, and reduced oxygen saturation levels on room air. The nurse noted that after assessment and notification of the physician, the physical advised LPN #38 to send the resident to the emergency department of a local hospital for evaluation. Resident #108 was transported by emergency medical services to the hospital for evaluation. There was no mention in the medical record that the resident or representative was provided with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen cautionary/safety signs were posted where oxygen was in use and failed to change oxygen tubing every week as ordered by physician. This affected five (#16, #41, #42, #45, and #124) of five residents reviewed for respiratory care. This had the potential to affect 31 residents the facility identified as having oxygen equipment maintained in his/her room. The facility census was 135. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed an original admission date of 03/20/19. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the physician orders for 10/2019 revealed an order for oxygen at two liters per minutes continuous. Observation on 10/21/19 at 8:30 A.M. revealed Resident #41 in his room with oxygen per a concentrator with an undated nasal cannula in use. His room did not have an oxygen cautionary sign…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interviews, review of facility policy and review of manufacturer recommendations, the facility failed to discard expired medications and failed to date opened insulin pens. The expired medications affected four residents (#2, #57, #112 and #118) and had the potential to affect all the residents that the facility identified as receiving medications and the insulin had the potential to affect nine residents the facility identified as receiving insulin by pens on the second floor of the [NAME] building. The facility census was 135. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #112's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/16/14. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, hypertension, seizures, schizophrenia, anxiety, and depression. Review of the physician orders for October 2019 revealed an order for Humalog eight units three times per day and Lantus 42 units every bedtime. During medication storage observation on 10/22/19 at 2:38 P.M. of the [NAME] Building second floor medication storage room revealed a Lantus insulin pen and a Humalog…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that food and beverage items were stored in the resident's snack and beverage utility rooms and in the refrigerators and were labeled and dated to prevent potential cross contamination and ensure only food/beverages used were not spoiled. This had the potential to affect 36 residents located on the Lighthouse unit, and the 33 residents located on the Two [NAME] unit. The facility census was 135. Findings include: Observation of the resident's snack and beverage utility room and the refrigerators on each resident unit were observed with Assistant Dietary Manager (AMD) #173 on 10/22/19 at 4:11 P.M. and the following was observed: 1. In the Lighthouse resident snack/beverage refrigerator, there were multiple open bottles of beverages which had been partially consumed including water bottles, a Gatorade bottle, a bottle of lemonade, none of which were labeled as to who they belonged to or dated as to when they were opened or no longer to be consumed. In addition, there were three beverage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of maintenance/housekeeping work order requests, the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary and orderly environment for residents. This had the potential to all 36 residents located on the Lighthouse unit, a secured unit for residents with dementia. The facility further failed to provide a safe area for residents to smoke. This had the potential to affect 27 Residents (#14, #23, #25, #29, #35, #40, #43, #47, #50, #57, #59, #60, #64, #67, #70, #71, #72, #77, #81, #84, #93, #94, #98, #101, #104, #109 and #113) whom the facility identified as smokers and utilized the smoking area. The facility census was 135. Findings include: 1. Observation of the Lighthouse Unit the secured unit with the Maintenance Assistant (MA) #116 on 10/23/19 beginning at 11:00 A.M. revealed in the activity/dining room there were five chairs being used by residents which had ripped arm rests and the top layer of the vinyl seat peeling off exposing the padding below. In the television…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident's were provided with water pitchers in their rooms in accordance with their needs and preferences. This affected three (#31, #103 and #127) of 35 residents residing on the Lighthouse unit. The facility census was 135. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #127's current comprehensive plan of care, with a target date of 11/06/19, revealed a plan of care to address the resident's poor food and fluid intake related to failure to thrive. The goal was for the resident to be free of symptoms of dehydration and maintain moist mucous membranes, and to consuming 1800 cubic centimeters (cc) of water/fluids every 24 hours. Interventions included to encouraging the residents to drink fluids of choice and ensure the resident had access to fluids as ordered whenever possible. The facility assessed the resident on 10/01/19 as having fair to good memory and recall. Interview and observation with Resident #127 on 10/22/19 at 9:23 A.M. reported that he did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and physician and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the doctor of a change in condition in a resident's health status. This affected one (Resident #42) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 135. Findings include: Record review for Resident #42 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, antibiotic resistance, sepsis, schizoaffective disorder, morbid obesity and cellulitis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/25/19, revealed Resident #42 had no cognitive deficits and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan, dated 05/05/17, revealed Resident #42 was at risk for pressure ulcer development related to disease process, decreased mobility and moisture exposure. An observation on 10/21/19 at 2:06 P.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #17 removing a dressing from Resident #42's hip/abdomen area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility's Self-Reported Incidents, resident and staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement their policy when they did not report immediately to the administration Resident #117's allegation of misappropriation. This affected one (#117) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 135. Findings include: Review of Resident #117's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/04/17. Diagnoses included anxiety, depressive disorder, stroke and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/01/19, revealed the resident had intact cognition. Interview on 10/21/19 at 3:15 P.M. with Resident #117 reported someone had taken forty dollars from her sometime last week. She stated she had told Unit Manager Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #142 and her family. Resident #117 pulled a clear plastic jar from her bed linen that had some dollar bills inside and stated that was where she last saw the money. She was unable to provide the day she reported to staff of her missing money.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, observation, record review, review of facility's Self-Reported Incidents and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation to administration immediately. This affected one (Resident #117) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 135. Findings include: Review of Resident #117's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/04/17. Diagnoses included anxiety, depressive disorder, stroke and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/01/19, revealed the resident had intact cognition. Interview on 10/21/19 at 3:15 P.M. with Resident #117 reported someone had taken forty dollars from her sometime last week. She stated she had told Unit Manager Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #142 and her family. Resident #117 pulled a clear plastic jar from her bed linen that had some dollar bills inside and stated that was where she last saw the money. She was unable to provide the day she reported to staff of her missing money. Observation on 10/23/19 at 11:43 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments which accurately reflected each resident's status in regarding to falls, incontinence and pain medication regimen. This affected two (#46 and #127) of 28 residents who were reviewed for accurate MDS assessments. The facility census was 135. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #46 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included fracture of one rib unspecified side, encounter for fracture with routine healing 08/27/19. Review of the nursing progress notes revealed an entry by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #54 on 08/26/19. LPN #54 documented the resident was heard crying out for help. The resident was across from the nursing station in the dining room laying on the floor on his right side. The resident's pain was rated at a ten on a scale of one (no pain) to 10 (most excruciating pain). LPN #54 noted the resident's grasp could not be assessed due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to implement comprehensive person-centered care plans. This affected one (#80) of 26 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 135. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 09/02/08. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, polyneuropathy, arthropathy, dementia, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease and dementia. Review of the physician orders, dated 11/09/17, revealed the resident was to have anti-roll backs to his wheelchair for safety with self-transfer. Review of the resident's care plan, last revised on 02/11/19, revealed the resident had an actual fall with no injury. Interventions included anti-roll backs to his wheelchair. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/03/19, revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and had no behaviors and did not reject care. Observation of Resident #80 on 10/22/19 at 3:10 P.M. revealed the resident was propelling himself in the main hallway in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide professional standards of care for wound care. This affected one (Resident #42) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 135. Findings include: Record review for Resident #42 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, gastric ulcer, diabetes mellitus, sepsis, morbid obesity and cellulitis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/25/19, revealed Resident #42 had no cognitive deficits, required extensive assistance to total dependence on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. An observation on 10/21/19 at 2:06 P.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #17 removing a dressing from Resident #42's hip/abdomen area revealed the dressing was wet with a urine odor and soiled with a brown substance. An interview on 10/21/19 at 2:26 P.M. with LPN #17 verified that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, physician and staff interviews, and record review the facility failed to timely assess a pressure wound. This affected one (#110) of 28 residents reviewed for orders in the initial screening process. The facility census was 135. Findings include: Review of Resident #110's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/22/14 with diagnoses including heart failure, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenia, dementia, diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/11/19, revealed the resident had cognitive impairments, no behaviors, and was totally dependence or one to two staff for activities of daily living. The MDS also indicated the resident was at risk for skin breakdown but did not have any. Review of physician orders for October 2019 revealed an order dated 05/16/19 to cleanse the sacrum with normal saline, pat dry, apply calcium alginate with silver (treated material for infected wounds) to wound bed, cover with dry dressing every night shift and as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-28 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide ongoing podiatry care for residents. This affected one (#117) of one resident reviewed for foot care. The facility census was 135. Findings include: Review of Resident #117's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/04/17 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, neuropathy, anxiety, depressive disorder, stroke and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/01/19, revealed the resident had intact cognition and was totally dependent on two staff for transfers, toileting, hygiene, extensive assist of one to dress, and set up for meals. Review of the care plan, dated 12/05/17, revealed there was a problem of diabetes mellitus with interventions to wash her feet daily with soap and water, dry thoroughly, and may use powder or lotion. Another intervention was to refer to podiatrist for foot care needs. Review of the podiatry note, dated 04/29/19, revealed the resident was to be seen in two to three months for at risk foot care. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to administer resident's medications with a medication error rate less than five percent. There were two medication errors out of 30 opportunities. The faciliy had a 6.6 percent medication error rate This affected two (#17 and #126) of 10 residents observed for medication administration. The in-house facility census was 135. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #17's physician orders revealed Depakote (anticonvulsant) 125 mg, seven capsules was to be administered at 9:00 A.M. along with Med Pass 120 milliliters. Observation on 10/23/19 at 9:18 A.M. of Resident #17 receiving medications by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #45 revealed he received seven capsules of Depakote 125 milligrams (mg.). There was no Med Pass administered to the resident. Interview on 10/23/19 at 9:30 A.M. with LPN #45 verified she did not administer Med Pass to Resident #17. LPN #45 reported the Med Pass was not available. 2. Review of Resident #126's physician orders revealed Renvela (phosphate binder) 800 mg. was to be given with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained during medication administration. This affected two residents (#17 and #101) of ten observed during medication administration. The facility census was 135. Findings include: Observation on 10/23/19 at 9:11 A. M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #45 revealed the nurse popped out a Clonazepam (controlled mediation) tablet from a blister card directly into her bare hands before placing it into a medication cup. She then opened individual packs of four other medications, placing three of them into the medication cup. After using a pill crusher she poured the crushed medications onto a blob of pudding and using her bare hands to open capsules, she sprinkled the fourth medication onto the pudding. She then spooned the medications into Resident #101's mouth. The LPN did not perform any hand hygiene and then returned to the cart and began to type on the laptop. LPN #45 then removed medications for Resident #17 from the cart and still using bare hands opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-12-01 · tag F0574 — widespread
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure information was available on how to contact the Ombudsman. This had the potential to affected 121 of 121 residents who resided in the facility. Facility census was 121. Findings include: Interviews during the resident group meeting on 11/16/22 at 12:58 P.M., revealed Residents (#16, #50, #99, #109, #111, and #119) expressed a concern of not knowing how to contact Ombudsman. Observations on 11/16/22 from 2:07 P.M. to 2:25 P.M., revealed buildings one, two, three west and four had no information posted on bulletin board pertaining to Ombudsman contact. Building one west was the only unit with information on bulletin board pertaining to Ombudsman contact. Interview on 11/16/22 at 2:10 P.M., revealed Activity Director (AD) #107 verified there was no postings of the Ombudsman information. Review of the policy titled Exceptional Living Centers-Resident Rights, dated 03/30/22, revealed residents have the right to be informed of his or her rights and all rules and regulations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2022-12-01 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews and review of the local post office business hours, the facility failed to ensure residents will have access to mail service on Saturdays. This affected six (#16, #50, #99, #109, #111, and #119) residents interviewed during resident council meeting and had the potential to affect all 121 residents in the facility. Facility census was 121. Findings include: Interviews during the resident group meeting on 11/16/22 at 12:58 P.M., revealed Residents (#16, #50, #99, #109, #111, and #119) expressed a concern that no mail is delivered on Saturdays due to no one is in the front office to deliver the mail to the residents. Interview on 11/16/22 at 2:10 P.M., with Activity Director (AD) #107 reported the mail goes to the business office and business office gives mail to activity staff. AD #107 reported the business office works Monday through Friday and if mail comes on Saturdays, residents will have to wait until Monday. Interview on 11/16/22 at 4:08 P.M., with Business Office Manager (BOM) #12 reported she receives mail and give it to activity staff.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-12-01 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to display the state agency survey results, where residents and visitors could visibly access them. This directly affected six (#16, #50, #99, #109, #111, and #119) residents interviewed during resident council meeting and had the potential to affect all 121 residents in the facility. Facility census was 121. Findings include: Interviews during the resident group meeting on 11/16/22 at 12:58 P.M., revealed Residents (#16, #50, #99, #109, #111, and #119) expressed a concern that they were unaware of the posting of the Ohio Department of Health survey results. Observation on 11/16/22 from 2:07 P.M. to 2:25 P.M., revealed buildings one, two, three west and four showed no signs posted to identify where survey results were located. Building one west was the only unit with information pertaining to state survey results. Interview on 11/16/22 at 2:10 P.M., Activity Director (AD) #107 verified the survey results were not posted in every building. Interview on 11/16/22 at 3:30 P.M., with Regional [NAME] President (RVP)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-12-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, review of resident council minutes, the facility failed to ensure information was posted for residents and their representatives on how to file a grievances and who the facility designated as a Grievance Official. This had the potential to affect 121 of 121 residents in the facility. Facility census was 121. Findings include: Record review of resident council meeting minutes from 12/21 to 10/22 revealed no information provided to residents on how to file a grievance, no information that how confidentially will remain if a grievance was filed. Interview on 11/16/22 at 12:58 P.M., with Residents (#16, #50, #99, #109, #111, and #119) complained they were unaware of filing a grievance. Residents attending the group meeting reported they were not sure who to go to when filing a grievance but was afraid that if they file one then it may get back to the person, they filed grievance against. Observation on 11/16/22 from 2:07 P.M. to 2:25 P.M., revealed buildings one, two, three west and four had no information posted on bulletin board…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2022-12-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review employee personal files, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by not doing the required reference checks on employee prior to hiring. This had the potential to all 121 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 121. Finding include: Review of 11 employee personnel files (#5, #19, #33, #36, #43, #58, #73, #74, #85, #126, and #132) revealed no reference checks were completed prior to hiring. Interview on 11/22/22 at approximately 2:00 P.M. with Regional Human Resources Business Partner (RHRBP) #205 verified there were no reference checks completed on 11 employees (#5, #19, #33, #36, #43, #58, #73, #74, #85, #126, and #132). Review of the Freedom from Abuse and Neglect Policy (not dated) revealed pre-employment screening will be completed on all employees, to include criminal history check, background check, reference check from previous employers, and professional licensure, certification, or registry check as applicable.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$159,338 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $119,655 — penalty dated 2024-09-03
  • $39,683 — penalty dated 2024-06-21
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-16 for 1 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-28 for 51 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARCADIA CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.3+0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.1+1.9 vs chain
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
YG FH HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2025
GRUMAN, AARONIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
JENNINGS, MONIQUEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
ARCADIA CARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
HUNTER, RACHELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
MCCLURE, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
ROMANELLO, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
SEITLER, DOVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
SPECTOR, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
TUROFSKY, STEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
WILHELM, NAFTALIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
CURIS SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 94%Medicare 2%Other / private 4%

About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$309per resident / day
operating cost
$9,390per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$278per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365005. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next