Avenues At Royal Oak
605 East Church Street, Kewanee, IL 61443 · For profit - Corporation · 200 certified beds · (309) 852-3389 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0607, F0610) — most recent Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
- inspectors cited 6 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (75) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $458,614 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-30)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.1% | 13.4% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 96.9% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.7% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 38.0% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.7% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.5% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.0% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 60.1% | 21.7% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.3% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.04 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.59 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.03 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 134.0 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 66 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
75 citations, most serious first. The 23 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to supervise a resident at high risk for elopement while on a 1:1 monitoring. This failure resulted in R4 leaving the facility unauthorized, and fracturing her foot while climbing/jumping over a fence. This failure applies to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for safety and supervision. The immediate Jeopardy began on 3/14/26 when V13 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) allowed R4 to shut her door and remain out of her line of vision while on a 1:1 monitoring status, allowing R4 to elope out of her window. V2 Administrator in Training was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 4/30/26 at 9:00 AM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview and record review that the immediate jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice corrected on 3/16/26, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of substance abuse was safe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-02-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the administration failed to develop behavior management policies; failed to perform resident background checks within 24 hours of admission; failed to follow the facility's Identified Offender Policy and Procedure resulting in residents with a history of qualifying identified offender criminal conviction offenses being admitted to the facility for treatment for mental health services, without having an adequate amount of staff or adequate staff training on managing mental health disorders and behaviors, without care planning or acquiring specialized needs services as documented on those residents' PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) Level II screenings and their pre-admission screenings; failed to ensure resident behavioral health needs were met and behavioral interventions were developed and implemented, failed to ensure the facility's discharge policy was followed, failed to ensure the facility provided adequate direct care staff and social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement their Abuse policy by failing to protect multiple residents from verbal, physical, and mental abuse from another resident (R2), failing to provide adequate supervision of (R2) to prevent (R2) from further abusing other residents, failing to investigate and report to the state surveying agency multiple reports of resident-to-resident abuse, failed to thoroughly investigate resident-to resident abuse allegations, and failing to notify the police of resident-to-resident abuse for three of four residents (R1, R3, and R5) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 76. These failures resulted in R2 (alleged perpetrator) having continued unsupervised access to all residents residing within the alarmed unit after R2 physically assaulted R1 by spitting on R1 on multiple occasions, cursing at R1 on multiple occasions, kicking and stomping R1 in the face, striking R3 in the face, striking R5 in the back of the head, and pushing R5 backwards. These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to protect residents (R1, R3, R5) from verbal, mental, and physical abuse from another resident (R2) for three of four residents (R1, R3, R5) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 76. This failure resulted in R2 spitting on R1 on multiple occasions, pouring water over R1's head, cursing at R1 on multiple occasions days before R2 physically assaulted R1 by kicking and stomping R1 in the face which resulted in R1 sustaining lacerations to the nose and left eyelid, head trauma, bruising around the left eye, a hematoma under the left eye, severe pain, and mental anguish that required emergency room care for treatment. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: The Immediate Jeopardy started on 1-25-24 at 4:00 PM when R2 physically assaulted R1 by kicking and stomping R1 in the face which resulted in R1 sustaining lacerations to the nose and left eyelid, head trauma, bruising around the left eye, a hematoma under the left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-14 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to document all measures the facility took to meet R2 and R11's behavioral and mental health needs that could not be met by the facility, failed to develop and implement behavioral interventions and care plans to meet those behaviors, failed to document the specific services the receiving facility will provide to meet R2 and R11's needs which could not be met by the facility, prior to discharging R2 to another long-term care facility, failed to notify R2's Physician of R2's discharge and R11's emergency discharge, and failed to allow R11 to remain in the facility while a discharge appeal was pending for two of three residents (R2 and R11) reviewed for discharge in the sample of 76. These failures resulted in R2 being transferred back to the same long-term care facility (name of facility) that was unable to meet R2 behavioral needs prior to admission to this facility and R2 experiencing increased anxiety and behaviors after being transferred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespreadRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to remove an alleged perpetrator V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant) from resident cares following staff (V4) to resident verbal abuse, failed to protect residents from an alleged abuser (V4), and failed to recognize verbal abuse for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of three. These failures resulted in V4 returning to work with all residents within the facility after verbally abusing R1, resulting in R1 feeling angry and experiencing fear. These failures have the potential to affect all 134 residents residing within the facility. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9-6-23 when the facility failed to remove V4 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) from the facility after verbally abusing R1 and failed to protect R1 and all other residents from V4 after V4 verbally abused R1. V1 (Administrator) and V9 (Activity Director) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 9-8-23 at 2:28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent verbal abuse from staff V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant) to a resident for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of three. This failure resulted in V4 yelling at R1Stop f*g talking to me (V4). You are an ass! resulting in R1 crying and experiencing mental anguish. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9-6-23 when the facility failed to prevent V4 from verbally abusing R1, resulting in R1 crying and experiencing mental anguish. V1 (Administrator) and V9 (Activity Director) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 9-8-23 at 2:28 PM. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 9-8-23. On 9-13-23 the surveyor confirmed through observation, interview, and record review that the facility took actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy. The facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as the facility continues to train staff and all new staff on the abuse policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for pain management by not adequately assessing, documenting or treating a resident's (R3) pain while awaiting further evaluation and treatment post fall with significant injury. This failure applied to one of four residents reviewed for pain management related to falls in a sample size of 6. Findings include: R3's face sheet showed the resident admitted to facility on 03/28/2025 with a past medical history not limited to dementia, neurocognitive disorder, presence of right artificial hip joint (04/29/2025), lack of coordination, anxiety disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 04/10/2025 showed R3 has severe cognitive impairment. R3's admission care plan indicated the resident has impaired cognitive function (rev 04/29/2025); is at risk for falls related to dementia and restless behavior (rev 04/30/2025); is at risk for pain related to left (injury is to the right) femur fracture post-surgery (rev 04/30/2025) with interventions not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transferred with a full mechanical lift for one of four residents (R84) reviewed for falls in a sample of 45 residents This failure resulted in R84 being sent to the hospital, suffered a back contusion which required medication for back pain management and ongoing psychosocial fear of being transferred with a mechanical lift. Findings include: The Limited Resident Lift Program and Equipment Use Training Requirements, not dated, stated all direct care staff responsible for resident handling/mechanical lift equipment will be trained by the Director of Nursing or specified facility representative initially upon orientation for all new employees and annually thereafter. Staff must be able to demonstrate proficiency with all types of lifts in the facility. A competency checklist for each type of lift will be completed during training and placed in the employee file. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-09-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide medications as ordered for one of four residents (R232) reviewed for medication administration, in a sample of 45. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 11/18/17, documents, Drug administration shall be defined as an act in which a single dose of a prescribed drug or biological is given to a resident by an authorized person in accordance with all laws and regulations governing such acts. The complete act of administration entails removing an individual dose from a previously dispensed, properly labeled container, verifying it with the physician's orders, giving the individual dose to the proper resident, and promptly recording the time and dose given. The facility's Adverse Drug Reactions and Medication Discrepancy policy, dated 11/6/18, documents, It is the policy of the facility that adverse drug reactions and drug errors are to be reported to the resident's physician, documented in the nursing notes and documented in the Adverse Drug Reaction or Medication Discrepancy Report.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adequately supervise a resident while showering. The facility also failed to transfer a resident with assistance of two staff as directed by the plan of care to prevent a fall for one of three residents (R55) reviewed for falls in the sample of 76. These failures resulted in R55 sustaining a fall while in the shower room, resulting in R55 suffering a head injury, head swelling, left ankle swelling with bruising, neck pain, and a traumatic hematoma to the forehead which required hospital treatment. Findings include: The facility's Fall Prevention policy dated 11-10-18 documents, Policy: To provide for resident safety and to minimize injuries related to falls; decrease falls and still honor each resident's wishes/desires for maximum independence with mobility. Responsibility: All staff. Procedure: 1. Conduct fall assessments on the day of admission, quarterly, and with a change in condition. 2. Identify, on admission, the resident's risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medication as ordered and assess pain on a daily basis for four of four residents (R88, R117, R233, R285) reviewed for pain in the sample of 23. These failures resulted in R285 having intractable pain following a fall that resulted in a fractured rib. Findings include: The facility's Pain Prevention & Treatment policy, dated 12/7/17, It is the facility policy to assess for, reduce the incidence of and the severity of pain in an effort to minimize further health problems, maximize ADL (Activities of Daily Living) functioning and enhance quality of life. Responsibility: All nursing personnel, physical therapists, occupational therapist, attending physician, Interdisciplinary Care Team. Pain Treatment Plan: a plan based on information gathered during a resident pain assessment that identifies the resident's needs and specifies appropriate interventions to alleviate pain to the extent feasible and medically appropriate. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for one (R117) of four residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 40. This failure resulted in R117 receiving an open laceration to his left jaw requiring three sutures. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program, revised 11/28/2016, documents This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, and staff from other agencies providing services to the individual, family members or legal guardians, friends, or any other individuals. Physical Abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. The Initial Report for Physical Abuse of R117, dated 10/18/23, documents an allegation of Physical abuse occurred on 10/18/23 at 12:15 pm between R117 and R92 and the police was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 4 of 7 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 7. The findings include:1. On 6/12/26 at 9:40 AM, R2 was sitting at the bedside in his room. R2 said R1 was cussing at him and so he hit him in the face with his hand. R2 said he never said anything to R1 to provoke him and didn't know why R1 was saying those things to him. R2 said R6 saw the whole thing. On 6/12/26 at 9:44 AM, R1 was walking around his room arranging his personal items. R1 stated R2 hit me and knocked my glasses. R1 said he was not sure why R2 hit him, he wasn't talking to him or about him. R1 said R6 saw what happened. R1 said the nurse said his left cheek was red but he didn't have an injury. On 6/12/26 at 9:52 AM, R6 was sitting in her room at the bedside. R6 said they were in the dining room and R2 hit R1 in the face and knocked him over in the chair. R6 said R1 fell on the floor but R1 grabbed the table to stop himself from falling hard. R6 said the staff came right away and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect by other residents. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for resident rights/dignity in the sample of 7. The findings include: On 5/29/26 at 10:30AM R4 stated, I get tired of hearing the F word from (R1) all the time. He's a jerk. I feel sorry for his roommate now. (R1) used to be across the hall from me and it was really bad. We had a lot of trouble right at the beginning. One time I told him to stop saying the F word because he was just going off and then he looked right at me and just started really going off- F this and F that. I know he has been in prison, and I think that is just how he is, but I don't want to hear it all the time. The CNAs were standing there, and I think they should have told him to stop. I didn't like the way he talked to me. He knows what he is doing and I just ignore him now. I just stay away from him. That was about 3 weeks ago. On 5/29/26 at 12:20PM V4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure windows in resident rooms were able to be opened to allow them to get fresh air. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for clean, comfortable and homelike conditions in the sample of 7. The findings include: On 5/29/26 at 11:20AM R5 stated, Before the AC (Air conditioning) units were put in, the windows were screwed shut. They put a screw in the track so you can't slide the window open. I understand they don't want people climbing out the windows, but we should be allowed to get some fresh air. It's inhumane. On 5/29/26 at 11:25AM R5 showed Surveyor her window where the screw usually sits. (The screw had been removed to allow the window to be opened and the AC unit to be installed). On 5/29/26 at 2:46PM V3 (Maintenance) stated, On the A wing we put a self-tapping screw in the track so they can't open the windows and climb out. We have done that for 16 years- ever since I have worked here. I've always been told to screw them shut so they can't open the windows at all. Only on the A wing. The other windows in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation of property for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 5.The findings include:R1s admission record shows she was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorders, borderline personality disorder and major depressive disorder.R1s resident assessment and care screening of 2/7/26 documents her to cognitively intact.R2s admission record shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Autistic disorder, adjustment disorder and anxiety. His 3/27/26 quarterly resident assessment and care screening documents him to be cognitively intact.The facility financial abuse final report of 4/10/26 documents R1 reported her wallet stolen, and the last place where she saw it was on her bed. She stated the only person in her room was R2.On 4/24/26 at 1:22pm- R1 stated she had cashed a check a couple days before for $900, the same day she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical and verbal abuse. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1-R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 11.The findings include: 1. The Final Abuse Report dated 2/11/26 shows R1 is [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety and chronic pain. R1 has moderate cognitive impairment. R2 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses including dementia, COPD, and hypertension. R2 is cognitively intact. On 2/6/26, V13 (RN) heard shouting between residents when he entered the room (R1, R2) were on the floor side by side. (R2's) arm was loosely wrapped around (R1's) neck holding him to the ground and (R1) was attempting to get loose. On 2/27/26 at 10:18 AM, R2 was in his room lying in bed, he said there was something that happened between him and another resident (R1). R2 said he put R1 in a choke hold, it was a big mistake. R2 said R1 was at the wrong place at the wrong time and the staff took care of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to safely discharge a resident for1 of 3 residents (R6) reviewed for safe discharge in the sample of 11.The Findings include:R6's Face Sheet documents, R6 has diagnoses that include diabetes and bipolar disorder. R6 was discharged last 1/30/26. The same face sheet documents discharged to-Nursing Home unknown.R6's facility assessment dated [DATE] show R6 has no cognitive impairment.R6's vital summary shows R6 weighs 426 pounds (lbs.)On 2/27/26 at 10:10 AM, V5 (Social Service) said R6 was transferred to another Nursing Home that took bariatric residents (approximately 145 miles away) from this facility. As far as I know R6 was still at the facility up to this time. V5 said she had not called the facility to check on R6 since the time of transfer. V5 said she provided the receiving Nursing Home R6's information but cannot recall who she spoke to at the facility. V5 also confirmed she did not document this information in R6's medical records.On 2/27/26 at V15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement it's policy and procedure to identify a potential sexual abuse allegation for one of four residents, reviewed for abuse, in a sample of six.The facility policy, Abuse Prevention and Reporting, dated (effective 12/2025) directs staff, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff and mistreatment of residents. This will be done by: Orienting and training employees on how to deal with stress and difficult situations, and how to recognize and report occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. During orientation of new employees, the facility will cover at least the following topics: What constitutes abuse and Procedures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report a potential allegation of sexual abuse, to the state agency or the local law enforcement agency for one of four resident (R1), reviewed for abuse, in sample of six.The facility policy, Abuse Prevention and Reporting, dated (effective 12/2025) directs staff, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff and mistreatment of residents. Any allegation of abuse or any incident that results in serious bodily injury will be reported to the state agency immediately. The facility shall also contact local law enforcement authorities in the following situations: sexual abuse of a resident by a staff member.The (facility) Resident Grievance form, dated 12/8/25 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide eight consecutive hours of a Registered Nurse, daily. This failure has the potential to affect all 128 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:The facility's Facility Assessment Tool, dated 9/11/2025, documents the facility will provide a Registered Nurse (RN) eight and a half hours per day as needed to accommodate RN staffing hours.The facility's (state agency) Notice of Staffing Violations, received date 8/18/25, documents the facility's January 1st- March 31st, 2025, quarter for payroll-based journal was shortfall for RN coverage on 55 days.The facility's nursing staff schedule for September 2025, documents on Saturday 9/6/25 and Sunday 9/7/25 the facility did not have eight hours of an RN working in the facility.On 9/16/2025 at 1:00 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) confirmed the facility does not have an RN on certain days for a minimum of eight hours. V2 stated On the dates that we don't have an RN on the schedule or the daily staffing sheet; it is because we don't have an RN. We have that issue and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure kitchen fans were kept clean and free of debris, label and date opened food items in the kitchen's refrigerator and freezer, complete and record cool down temperatures for meat that was prepared and stored in the facility's refrigerator and ensure dietary staff's facial hair was covered while in the kitchen. This failure has the potential to affect all 128 residents.Findings include:The facility's Ceiling and Fans Policy, un-dated, documents Frequency: All fans should be cleaned quarterly or more often, if needed, by maintenance. Purpose: To ensure a clean work environment. The facility's Storage Policy, undated, documents Policy: Food should be stored properly and used within the appropriate time period to ensure safe and high-quality food is served. Purpose: Food safety. Procedure: The Use-by Guidelines-Posted should be used to determine a use-b date when labeling opened or unopened food that must be used within a certain time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 52 citations
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-16 · tag F0847 — widespreadInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents and their representatives were provided a clear, accurate, and understandable explanation of the arbitration agreement during the admission process, resulting in confusion and lack of informed consent for all residents reviewed. This failure has the potential to affect all 128 residents who reside in the facility.Findings include:The facility's undated Arbitration Agreement documents, Arbitration is an alternative means of resolving a dispute in place of court litigation. Binding Arbitration mean that both parties must comply with the arbitration decision, and that decision cannot be appeal. This agreement binds all parties, including, without limitation, any spouse, children or heirs of the resident, whose claims arise out of injuries, death because of alleged negligence, or wrongful act, but not intentional injury, and services rendered for any condition and arising out of the diagnosis, treatment, or care of the resident.The facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Long Term Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for residents in A Wing, resulting in unsanitary conditions, structural disrepair, and the presence of black fuzzy discoloration on bathroom walls and standing water in multiple bathrooms for 46 of 46 residents (R1, R4, R14, R15, R16, R17, R19, R21, R22, R27, R28, R29, R31, R40, R42, R44, R45, R46, R48, R51, R52, R53, R56, R60, R62, R64, R70, R71, R73, R79, R81, R83, R84, R89, R96, R97, R103, R106, R107, R110, R113, R120, R125,R130, R131, and R132) reviewed for environment in the sample list of 74. Findings include: The facility's Cleaning-Sanitizing Bathing Equipment and Toilet Seats Policy revised 1/2018 documents housekeeping personnel are responsible for at least daily cleaning of bathing equipment, wipe down or scrub all surfaces with a soft brush, cleaning cloth or sponge and sanitizing agent to assure removal of organic matter and then completely rinse with clean water. The facility's Housekeeper Supervisor policy revised 7/2023 documents the primary purpose of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide privacy during gastrostomy cares/feeding for one of two residents (R27) reviewed for gastrostomy cares in a sample of 74.Findings Include:The Illinois Long Term Care Ombudsman Program Resident Rights Policy, Revised 11/18 documents, Your facility must treat you with dignity and respect and must care for you in a manner that promotes your quality of life. You have a right to privacy. Facility staff must respect your privacy when you are being examined or given care.R27's Physician Order sheet documents, Enteral Feeding Order, four times a day, every day.On 9/14/2025 at 12:43 PM, V11 (Registered Nurse) began gastrostomy cares to R27. R27's door was wide open, and R27's curtain was halfway closed. Various residents walked past R27's room and observed V11 performing R27's gastrostomy care.On 9/14/2025 at 1:00 PM, V11 confirmed she should have closed the curtain all the way or shut the door before beginning R27's cares.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a call light was in reach for one of one resident (R63) reviewed for call lights in a sample of 74.Findings include: The facility's Call Light Policy, dated 10/2024, documents Purpose: To respond to residents' requests needs in a timely and courteous manner. Guidelines: Resident call lights will be answered in a timely manner. 1. All residents that have the ability to use a call light shall have the nurse call light system available at all times and within easy accessibility to the resident at the bedside or other reasonable accessible location.R63's Care Plan dated 9/24/24, documents, (R63) is usually unable to perform ADLS (Activities of Daily Livings) without weight bearing/hands on assist of one to two care givers or dependent for cares related to history of Stroke. This same plan of care documents R63 requires staff assistance with all ADLS and extensive assistance with two staff members and mechanical lift for transfers.On 9/14/2025 at 9:21 AM R63 was sitting in a high back wheelchair in his room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to allow a resident their preferred smoking method for one of three residents (R62) reviewed for smoking in a sample of 74. Findings Include:The Illinois Long Term Care Ombudsman Program Resident Rights Policy, Revised 11/18 documents, Your rights to dignity and respect, you have a right to make your own choices. R62's Smoking Safety Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents R62 smokes tobacco. This same assessment also documents R62 is not cognitively impaired, able to smoke, does not show potential for causing injury to self or others from smoking in unauthorized areas or careless use of smoking materials, has no history of hazardous behavior while smoking, follows facility smoking policy, and is on supervision during smoking times.R62's Smoking Progress Note dated 7/30/2025 and signed by V13 (Activity Director), documents (R62) does use tobacco. (R62) does not use an electronic cigarette or vaping device. (R62) is not interested in receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a residents personal preference and dignity was provided for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 8.The findings include:On 7/31/25 at 9:58 AM, R2 was in her room in bed on the locked psychiatric unit of the facility. R2 stated that she never said she was flicked in the eye or face by the nurse. R2 stated what she was upset about was that she was told she could not eat in the main dining room. V5 registered Nurse said she had to eat in the small dining room where the TV is at. R2 stated on Friday after she reported a possible suicide attempt for someone else, she was told she had to eat in the TV/small dining room and not the main dining room. R2 stated sitting in the TV room gives her panic attacks. When she told them that on Friday, they let her eat dinner in the main dining room. On Saturday at breakfast, she thought she would be okay to eat in the dining room; instead V5 made her sit in the TV room and left her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility's direct care staff failed to notify the abuse coordinator of an injury of unknown origin for one of four residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in a sample of eight.The findings include:R1's face sheet indicated an initial admission date of 03/01/2011 with a past medical history not limited to: paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, mood affective disorder, anxiety, anemia, pruritis, history of shock therapy, and long term (current) use of anticoagulants.R1's care plan indicated but not limited to: risk for injury related to limited dexterity and cognitive impairment and risk for falls with date initiated of 10/02/2023.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C for cognitive patterns dated 04/13/2025 indicated severe cognitive impairment. R1's skin condition report with effective date of 07/26/2025 submitted by V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse) documented bruising to R1's rear right thigh, chin, front left shoulder, and right front lower leg that were purple in color and a new/change in skin condition.Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident by not adequately assessing a resident for risk of falls, not assessing a resident for injury after a fall, and not properly transferring a resident off the floor after a fall incident for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls in the sample of eight.The findings include:R1's face sheet indicated initial admission date of 03/01/2011 with a past medical history not limited to: paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, mood affective disorder, anxiety, anemia, pruritis, history of shock therapy, and long term (current) use of anticoagulants.R1's care plan indicated but not limited to: risk for injury related to limited dexterity and cognitive impairment and, is a risk for falls both with date initiated of 10/02/2023; requires use of psychotropic medications (antidepressant, antipsychotic, anti-anxiety) to manage mood and/or behavior issues, date initiated 04/07/2024. R1's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect two vulnerable residents by not preventing resident to resident physical abuse. This failure applied to two of four residents (R2, R4) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 6 that resulted in R2 being hit on the top of the head by R1 and R4 being slapped on the hand by R5. Findings include: 1. Final investigation report dated 04/25/2025 documented that R1 and R2 were both in the main hallway when alleged incident occurred. R2 was in wheelchair and cut in line in front of R1, who was standing. R2 touched R1's back as she was trying to get around her in the wheelchair. R1 instinctively turned and made contact to the top of R2's head. R1's face sheet indicated the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a past medical history not limited to bipolar II disorder, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 05/20/2025 showed R1 has no cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three residents (R2) from physical abuse by another resident, in a sample of seven. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility policy, Abuse Prevention and Reporting, dated (approved) 09/2024 directs staff, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. Abuse means any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon a resident other than by accidental means. Physical abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means that requires medical attention. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. The facility Report to State Office, dated 3/8/2025 at 6:00 A.M. and signed by V1/Administrator documents,(R3) alleges (he) was struck by another resident (R2). Injuries: 2 CM (Centimeter) laceration to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) rescreen after the emergence of a newly diagnosed severe mental illness for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for PASARR screening, in the sample of 7. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility policy, Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review, dated (reviewed) 3/2024 directs staff, Annually and with any significant change of status, the facility will complete the PASARR Level 1 screen for those individuals identified per the Level 11 screen requiring specialized services. The facility will report any changes identified via the screen to the state mental health authority or the state intellectual disability authority promptly. The facility will refer all level 11 residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder for a level 11 review upon a significant change in status assessment to the State PASARR representative. R2's most current PASARR screen, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a high risk resident from physical abuse for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in a sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy, revised 09/2024, documents that the facility affirms the right of our resident it be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation, of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. A resident to resident altercation should be reviewed as potential situation of abuse. Resident to resident altercations that include any willful action that results in physical injury, mental anguish or pain must be reported in accordance with regulations. R1's electronic medical record documents the following diagnosis: bipolar, anxiety, depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, traumatic brain injury, insomnia, and pseudobulbar affect. R1's Abuse/Neglect Screening, dated 1/27/25, documents a score of 6, indicating R1 is a high risk for abuse. R1's current care plan documents that R1 is at high risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to monitor food temperatures to ensure food was served at a palatable temperature. This failure has the potential to affect all residents that reside at the facility. Findings include: A facility policy last revised 09/2023 and titled Monitoring Food Temperatures for Meal Service documents, Food temperatures will be monitored to prevent foodborne illness and ensure foods are served at palatable temperatures. Procedure: 1. Prior to serving a meal, food temperatures will be taken and and documented for all hot and cold foods to ensure proper serving temperatures. Any food item not found at the correct holding/serving temperature will not be served but will undergo the appropriate corrective action listed below. 2 The temperature for each food item will be recorded on the Food Temperature Log. Foods that required a a corrective action (such as reheating) will have the new temperature recorded with a notation of the corrective action intervention. Resident Council Meeting notes dated November 21, 2024, document, The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure funds were available for 100 of 100 residents (R2, R4, R5, R7-R10, R12-R104) reviewed for personal funds in a sample of 104. Findings include: The facility's Resident Funds Policy, dated 3/2024, documents Resident Funds- Guidelines: This facility manages the personal funds of residents when such request is made by the resident. Access to Personal Funds: Residents should have access to petty cash on an ongoing basis and be able to arrange for access to larger funds. Although the facility need not maintain 100.00 dollars (50.00 dollars for Medicaid residents) per resident on its premises, it is expected to maintain petty cash on hand to honor resident requests. Banking hours shall be posted in a visible area and indicate where inquiries should be directed during the posted hours. Resident request for access to their funds should be honored by facility staff as soon as possible but not later than: The same day for amounts less than 100.00 dollars (50.00 dollars for Medicaid residents); Three banking days for amounts of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of employee to resident sexual abuse to the State Agency and to Law Enforcement of one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Facility Policy/Abuse Prevention and Reporting dated 09/2024 documents: The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff and mistreatment of residents. This will be done by: Filing accurate and timely investigative reports. Sexual Abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Sexual Abuse includes, but is not limited to: Unwanted intimate touching of any kind especially of breasts or perineal area.\ Generally, sexual contact is nonconsensual if the resident either: Lacks ability to consent and/or does not want the contact to occur. Internal Reporting Requirements and Identification of Allegations: Upon learning of the report, the administrator or a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect one resident (R1) after an allegation of employee to resident sexual abuse was reported for three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Facility Policy/Abuse Prevention and Reporting dated 09/2024 documents: The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff and mistreatment of residents. This will be done by: Immediately protecting residents involved in identified reports of possible abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment and misappropriation of property. Protection of Residents: The facility will take steps to prevent potential abuse while the investigation is underway. Employees of the facility who have been accused of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resdient property will be removed from resdient contact immediately. The employee shall not be permitted to return to work until the results of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for 1 of 4 residents (R9) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 9. The findings include: R9's admission record shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, other obesity due to excessive calories and polycystic ovarian syndrome. Her 9/2/24 quarterly assessment documents she is cognitively intact with verbal behaviors and other behaviors not directed at others to include verbal yelling out. On 11/2/24 at 11:10 AM, R9 stated she had concerns with her treatment from a night shift CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), V15. R9 said a couple days ago she started her period for the first time in awhile so she was wearing her underwear to bed. R9 said she put on her call light during the night to use the bedpan, and V15 entered her room to assist her. She said when V15 asked her why she was wearing underwear, she told her about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were immediately reported to the administrator for 1 of 4 residents (R9) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 9. The findings include: R9's admission record shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, other obesity due to excessive calories and polycystic ovarian syndrome. Her 9/2/24 quarterly assessment documents she is cognitively intact with verbal behaviors and other behaviors not directed at others to include verbal yelling out. On 11/2/24 at 11:10 AM, R9 stated she had concerns with her treatment from a night shift CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), V15. R9 said a couple days ago she started her period for the first time in awhile so she was wearing her underwear to bed. R9 said she put on her call light during the night to use the bedpan, and V15 entered her room to assist her. She said when V15 asked her why she was wearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Contact Precautions throughout the facility to protect vulnerable residents and prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). This failure has the potential to affect all 132 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy, dated 7/13/23, documents Purpose: To reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. EBP should be used when contact precautions do not apply for residents with any of the following: Open wounds that require a dressing change, indwelling medical devices, infection or colonized with a MDRO. EBP requires use of a gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for the transfer of MDRO's to staff hands and clothing. EBP is primarily intended to use for care that occurs within a resident's room, when high-contact resident care activities are bundled together. Outside of a resident's room, EBP should be followed when performing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their Antibiotic Stewardship program was implemented. This failure has the potential to affect all 132 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: The facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program policy (reviewed 12/12/18) documents the following: Purpose: to improve the use of Antibiotics in healthcare to protect residents and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance through a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing adverse events associated with antibiotic use. This will be accomplished by utilizing the Core Elements. Leadership Commitment: Demonstrates support and commitment for safe and appropriate antibiotic use. Accountability: Identify physicians, nursing and pharmacy leads responsible for overseeing antibiotic stewardship activities. Drug Expertise: Establish access to consultant pharmacists or other individuals with expertise or training in antibiotic stewardship. Action: Implement at least one policy or practice to improve antibiotic use.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-25 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist was adequately implementing and performing duties that accompany the position. This failure has the potential to affect all 132 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: The facility's Infection Preventionist Job Description documents the following: Qualifications: Must possess the ability to plan, organize, analyze, develop, implement and interpret the goals, objectives, policies, procedures, etc., of the Infection Control Program. This same job description documents, The Infection Preventionist is accountable for decreasing the incidence and transmission of infectious diseases between residents, staff, visitors and community. Through strategic planning, leadership and consultation, you will lead and direct a robust team in the identification and implementation of infection prevention goals and objectives throughout the facility. The Infection Preventionist reports to the Director of Nursing, Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee and partners with the Medical Director to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were responded to in a timely manner for eight of 43 residents (R20, R37, R54, R55, R57, R63, R66 and R109) reviewed for call lights in the sample of 45. Findings include: Monthly Resident Council Meeting Minutes (dated June 2024) document the following concern: CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistant)- Third shift needs to answer call light quicker. On 09/24/24 from 09:15 AM - 10:30 AM, a group meeting was conducted with residents who attend Monthly Resident Council Meetings at the facility. All residents in attendance at the meeting, R37, R54, R55, R57, R63 and R66, verbalized concerns with excessive call light response times from facility staff. All residents stated it can take around 30 minutes to get someone to respond to call lights, especially after meals. R63 stated staff's response to call light times on third shift is way too long and has exceeded one hour on multiple occasions, especially for those residents who need extensive help. All residents present in the meeting stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Record Review and Interview, the facility failed to ensure residents electronic medical records and care plans matched their Physician's Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) for Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) code status for two of 32 residents (R42, R92) reviewed for Advanced Directives in the sample of 45. Findings include: The facility's Advanced Directive Policy, dated [DATE], documents Policy: The Patient Self Determination Act states that individuals have the right to make their own decisions, and to formulate advance directives to serve as decisions when the individual is incapacitated. It is the policy of this facility to honor resident's wishes as expressed in advanced directives regarding medically indicated treatments whenever possible. The facility shall take all steps necessary to comply with state and federal legislation relating to advanced directives. 4. Any decision made by the resident shall be indicated in the chart in the manner easily understood by all staff. Advanced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and implement a baseline care plan for one of two residents (R232) reviewed for new admission care plans, in a sample of 45. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility policy, Baseline Care Planning, dated (revised) 11/1/2017 directs staff, It is the policy of the (facility) to promptly assess and plan care for each resident admitted to the facility. A plan of care (Baseline Care Plan) shall be developed to include instructions needed to provide effective person-centered care to each resident, based on his/her initial assessment and the professional standards of quality of care, to serve as a functional guide in delivery of care until such time as a comprehensively plan is developed. R232's current Physician Order Sheet, dated September 2024 documents that R232 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood, Borderline Personality Disorder, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observation, Interview and Record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during wound care for one of four residents (R84) reviewed for Pressure ulcers in the sample of 45. Finding Include: The Facility's Preventative Skin Care Policy, dated 3/16/2023, documents, It is the facility's policy to provide preventative skin care through repositioning and careful washing, rinsing, drying, and observation of the resident's skin condition to keep them clean, comfortable, well groomed, and free from pressure ulcers. All residents will be assessed using the Braden Pressure Ulcer Scale at the time of admission and weekly times four then will be reassessed at least quarterly and/or as needed. Any resident identified as being at high risk for potential skin breakdown shall be turned and repositioned at a minimum of every two hours. Special mattresses and/or chair cushions will be used on any resident identified as being at high risk for potential skin breakdown. Encourage resident activity, when feasible. Use repositioning techniques and Range of Motion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and follow through ROM (Range of Motion) exercises for residents with functional limited range of motion for one of five residents (R64) reviewed for limited mobility in the sample of 45. Findings include: The Facility's Restorative Nursing Programs policy, dated 4/2006, documents, It is the policy of (the facility) to facilitate the movements of individuals toward independence while helping them satisfy their needs by providing Restorative Nursing Programs. Goal of the Restorative Nursing Program is to assist a resident to reach and maintain his/her highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial needs. Implementing the Program, Determine the setting to implement the plan. Consider the length of time, as well as the time of day involved for teaching. On 09/22/24, at 10:15 AM, R64 was in his wheelchair, able to tell me his name and repeat who I was. R64 yells to communicate. R64 cannot move his bilateral legs, and cannot move his arms, his hands were closed and balled up tight unable to release them. R64's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter tubing was off the floor and urinary drainage bag was covered and failed to keep indwelling urinary catheter bag below a resident's bladder for one (R92) of two residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters in a sample of 45. Findings include: R92's Physician Orders, dated 9/24/24, documents R92 has a Physician order for an (indwelling) catheter. On 09/22/24 at 11:18 AM R92 was sitting in a recliner in the lounge area by south nurse's desk. R92's indwelling catheter was uncovered with no privacy bag and the indwelling catheter tubing and catheter bag was lying on the floor. On 9/22/24 at 11:50 AM V9/Licensed Practical nurse verified R92's indwelling catheter tubing and catheter bag should not be sitting on the floor and that R12's catheter bag should have a privacy bag over it. On 9/23/24 at 9:50 AM V6/Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), V7/CNA, and V8/CNA were preparing to transfer R92 with a mechanical lift from R92's wheelchair to his bed. During the mechanical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide ongoing communication with the dialysis center and failed to develop a complete, comprehensive care plan for a resident receiving dialysis services for one of one resident (R233) reviewed for dialysis, in a sample of 45. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The unnamed, undated facility policy directs staff, It is the policy of this facility to provide coordination of care with the resident's dialysis provider. Procedure: Residents needing dialysis services will be admitted with the co-ordination of their dialysis provider off site with a predetermined schedule. The facility will review contracts to assure resident's needs are met while residing at the facility. The facility will co-ordinate care with the dialysis provider in developing an appropriate plan of care to include, but not limited to: Specific days of the week resident will attend dialysis; Any recommended medication schedule change; Meal or snack sent with resident.; Fluid restriction and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to provide psychosocial therapies and psychiatric support services to resident with diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder and repeated emergency room visits for suicidal ideation's and depression for one of six residents (R102) reviewed for Behavioral Services in the sample of 45. Findings include: The facility's Facility Assessment, dated 9/20/24, documents Cares provided for the resident population include but are not limited to: Mental health and behavior; identify and implement interventions to help support individuals with anxiety, cognitive impairment, depression, PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), and other psychiatric diagnosis. Support by group and individual therapies, and structured activities. In house psychiatric physician management. This assessment also documents the facility will provide therapy services including psychiatry. The facility's (undated) Social Service Assistant policy documents Job Summary: Assists the Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for two (R1 and R2) of four residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 12. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program, dated 11/28/2016, documents This facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, and staff from other agencies providing services to the individual, family members or legal guardians, friends, or any other individuals. Abuse is the willful injection of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. The facility's Final Abuse Report, dated 6/10/24, submitted to State Agency on 6/15/24, documents an altercation occurred between R1 and R2 resulting in R2 receiving a black eye. This report documents: Reported to ADM (Administrator) that (R2) had discoloration to eye.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician order and have Speech Therapy services assess a resident's individual swallowing needs after a choking incident for two (R1 and R2) of three residents reviewed for accidents/incidents in a sample of three. Findings include: The facility Residents' Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities, dated 11/18, documents Your facility must provide equal access to quality care regardless of diagnosis, condition, or payment source. Your facility must provide services to keep your physical and mental health, at their highest practical levels. Facility Therapy Services Agreement, which began on 3/12/24 and signed on 3/13/24, documents Contractor will provide licensed Therapists in adequate training and number to provide Rehabilitation Services at the facility as needed by the facility patients. Contractor will provide Rehabilitation Services on weekends and holidays as clinically appropriate, and in accordance with a plan of care. Contractor will prepare treatment records and provide prompt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0825 — patternProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to ensure Physical and Occupational Therapy services were provided to residents who have been determined to have the need for Physical and Occupational Therapy services for eleven of eleven residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11) reviewed for Therapy in the sample of eleven. Findings include: The facility's Facility Assessment, dated 2/7/24, documents Cares provided for the resident population include but are not limited to: Therapy- Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech Therapy, music, crafts, management of supporting devices, splints and braces. This assessment also documents the following healthcare professionals and medical practitioners who will provide support and care for residents of the facility includes Therapy services. On 3/5/24 at 10:07 AM, V2 (Administrator in Training, trainee) stated he oversees daily functioning of the facility operations when V1(Administrator in Training) is away. V2 stated February 16th is the last day we had Physical, Occupational or Speech therapy in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-14 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — widespreadEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a sufficient number of staff and train a sufficient number of staff to care for and meet the behavioral needs of residents with mental and psychosocial disorders. These failures have the potential to affect all 131 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: The facility's Midnight Census form (dated 1-29-24) indicates that 131 residents are currently residing in the facility. The facility's Nurse Staffing policy (undated) documents the following: It is the policy of (facility) to provide sufficient licensed and unlicensed nursing staff on each shift of the day to attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident. Nursing staff shall be based upon resident evaluation by the Administrator and Director of Nursing as specified by the (State Agency). Each skilled care resident shall receive at least 3.8 hours of nursing and personal care each day, and 2.5 hours of nursing and personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to allow a resident to use an electronic monitoring camera for one of three residents (R10) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 76. Findings include: The Electronic Monitoring in Long-Term Care Facilities Illinois Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Authorized Electronic Monitoring in Long-Term Care Facilities Act Public Act 99-043 date 12/2017 documents, The authorized electronic monitoring in long-term care facilities act provided a way for residents of long-term care facilities and their families to help ensure that residents receive the best care possible. The Illinois Attorney General's office worked closely with resident advocates and long-term care facility associations to create a framework that allows residents and their families to use cameras while protecting the privacy rights of others and ensuring there is no cost to facilities. Under the Law: A resident has the right to purchase and use an electronic monitoring device that records or broadcasts audio and video after providing notice to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a written notice of a facility initiated discharge, including the reason for discharge, the location to where the resident is discharged , the regional Ombudsman's and the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy of individuals with a mental disorder contact information, or the resident's appeal rights to the resident, the resident's POA (Power of Attorney), and the Office of State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for notice of discharge in a sample of 76. Findings include: The facility's Transfer and Discharge Policy and Procedure policy (undated) documents, Involuntary transfers or discharges: Except for the case of late payment or nonpayment, the facility shall notify the resident and the residents family member, surrogate or representative of the transfer and the reasons for the transfer as stated in the clinical record. Notice of involuntary transfer or discharge shall be on the forms prescribed by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespreadHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide responses, actions, and rationale taken regarding resident council concerns, grievance complaints, suggestions, and recommendations. These failures have the potential to affect all 135 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Facility Census and Conditions Report, dated 10/25/23, documents 135 Residents residing in the Facility. The Facility Administrator Job Description, undated, documents: Administrator is responsible for managing, planning, organizing, directing, coordinating and the physical management of the Facility in a way that the purpose of the Facility shall be maintained in accordance with all established practices, policies, laws and applicable State Regulations; will manage and conduct business of the Facility license and certification at all times; and operate the Facility in compliance with all Federal and State rules and regulations; assure proper Facility and department operation through the implementation of the specified Quality Assurance Program; provide an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-26 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the Facility Survey Results were maintained, up to date and in a location accessibility for the Residents and visitors to review. This failure has the potential to affect all 135 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Facility Census and Condition Report, dated 10/25/23, documents 135 Residents residing in the Facility. The State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Residents' Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities, revised 11/18, documents that Residents have the right to see reports of all inspections by the (State Agency) from the last five years and the most recent review of your facility along with any plan that your facility gave to the surveyors saying how your facility plans to correct the problem. On 10/23/23 at 9:00 am, a black binder documenting the Facility's Survey Results,, was on a table in the front lobby entrance to the Facility. The Facility survey binder documents survey results dated January 2021 through January 2023. No previous or recent survey results were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This has the potential to affect all 135 residents in the Facility. Findings include: Facility Census and Conditions Report, date 10/25/23, documents 135 Residents residing in the Facility. Facility Resident Rights, revised 11/18, documents: that Residents have the right to complain to the Facility and get a prompt response; must treat Residents with dignity and respect, and care for Residents in a manner that promotes quality of life; and must be a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The Facility Administrator Job Description, undated, documents: Administrator is responsible for managing, planning, organizing, directing, coordinating and the physical management of the Facility in a way that the purpose of the Facility shall be maintained in accordance with all established practices, policies, laws and applicable State Regulations; will manage and conduct business of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the Facility failed to oversee, govern, and initiate programs for Quality Assurance Performance Improvement programs/plans and follow-up for the calendar year. This failure has the potential to affect all 135 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings Include: Facility Census and Condition Report, dated 10/25/23, documents 135 Residents residing in the Facility. The Facility Administrator Job Description, undated, documents: Administrator is responsible for managing, planning, organizing, directing, coordinating and the physical management of the Facility in a way that the purpose of the Facility shall be maintained in accordance with all established practices, policies, laws and applicable State Regulations; will manage and conduct business of the Facility license and certification at all times; and operate the Facility in compliance with all Federal and State rules and regulations; and assure proper Facility and department operation through the implementation of the specified Quality Assurance Program. The Facility's Quality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-26 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the Facility failed to conduct quarterly Quality Assurance/QA Performance Improvement meetings and failed to identify, monitor, and correct QA potential concerns for the last calendar year. This failure has the potential to affect all 135 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings Include: Facility Census and Condition Report, dated 10/25/23, documents 135 Residents residing in the Facility. The Facility Administrator Job Description, undated, documents: Administrator is responsible for managing, planning, organizing, directing, coordinating and the physical management of the Facility in a way that the purpose of the Facility shall be maintained in accordance with all established practices, policies, laws and applicable State Regulations; will manage and conduct business of the Facility license and certification at all times; and operate the Facility in compliance with all Federal and State rules and regulations; and assure proper Facility and department operation through the implementation of the specified Quality Assurance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-26 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to conduct quarterly Quality Assurance/QA Performance Improvement meetings and assure the required committee members were present for the last calendar year. This failure has the potential to affect all 135 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings Include: Facility Census and Condition Report, dated 10/25/23, documents 135 Residents residing in the Facility. The Facility Administrator Job Description, undated, documents: Administrator is responsible for managing, planning, organizing, directing, coordinating and the physical management of the Facility in a way that the purpose of the Facility shall be maintained in accordance with all established practices, policies, laws and applicable State Regulations; will manage and conduct business of the Facility license and certification at all times; and operate the Facility in compliance with all Federal and State rules and regulations; and assure proper Facility and department operation through the implementation of the specified Quality Assurance Program. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform a care plan meeting with a resident and revise a care plan following a fall, new onset of pain, use of an antipsychotic and target behaviors, and significant weight loss for six of 29 residents (R5, R24, R49, R117, R284, R285) reviewed for care plans in the sample of 40. Findings include: 1. R24's Physician's orders, dated 10/24/23, document that R24 has an order to receive Olanzapine (antipsychotic) 2.5 mg (milligrams) by mouth in the evening for the diagnosis of bipolar disorder. R24's care plan, dated 10/2/23, documents, The resident uses psychotropic medications related to behavior management. Disease process. R24's care plan has no documentation to include that R24 receives an antipsychotic nor the diagnosis or behaviors for the use of the antipsychotic. On 10/25/23 at 10:45 AM, V13 (Care Plan Coordinator) confirmed that R24's care plan is not revised to include that R24 is receiving an antipsychotic. 2. R49's Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers to a resident dependent on assistance with showering for one of one resident (R284) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance in the sample of 40. Findings include: On 10/23/23 at 10:23 AM, R284 was alert sitting on the side of her bed with her wheel walker sitting in front of her. R284's hair was disheveled with a wet like appearance to it. R284's right eye is completely closed surgically. R284 stated, I don't have a right eye and I'm practically blind in my left eye. I can see shadows and shapes. Look at this dirty hair! It's greasy and I stink. I haven't had a shower for over a week. I'm supposed to get a shower every Wednesday and Saturday on 2nd shift, and I haven't gotten one for at least a week. This is disgusting. I'm going to ask them if I can have one today, even if it isn't my shower day but I doubt they will give me one. They will have some kind of excuse. They always tell me they can't because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document current Advance Directives and code status in the physician's orders and on the care plan for one resident (R233) of 27 residents reviewed for Advance Directives in the sample of 40. Findings include: Facility Policy/Advance Directives dated [DATE] documents: After confirming the accuracy of provided documents with the resident/responsible party, the document will be sent for appropriate signatures. No order for No Code or DNR shall be effective until the Uniform Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Form is signed by resident/responsible party and physician order is received and documented. Any decision made by the resident shall be indicated in the chart in the manner easily understood by all staff. Those resident's indicating Do Not Attempt Resuscitation/DNR shall be recorded as a DNR. Code status shall be recorded on the resident's Physician Order Sheet. Staff must be aware of any requests for Medical Interventions shall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure wrist restraints were applied according to manufacturer's safety guidelines and failed to evaluate bed rails. The facility also applied arm weights as restraints for one (R5) of two residents reviewed for physical restraints in the sample of 40. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program, revised 11/28/2016, documents This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined below. This includes, but is not limited to, freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. The facility's limb restraint Manufacturer's Guidelines for the use of R5's wrist restraints documents in Application Instructions: Triangulation process; to restrict patient's range of motion: Separate the straps and attach at different points along the frame that moves with the patient, out of the patients reach, using quick-release…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive assessment for the use of side rails and pain management for two of 29 residents (R233, R285) reviewed for care plans in the sample of 40. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning policy, dated 7/20/22, documents, It is the policy of the facility to comprehensively assess and periodically reassess each resident admitted to this facility. The results of this resident assessment shall serve as the basis for determining each resident's strengths, needs, goals, life history, and preferences to develop a person centered comprehensive plan of care for each resident that will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintaining the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 1. On 10/22/23 at 08:17 AM, R285's bed had a full padded side rail up on the left side in the upright position, and a full padded side rail down on the right side. On 10/22/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify triggers, develop a Trauma Informed Care Plan and interventions for one resident (R112) identified with PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) of 32 residents in the sample of 40. Findings include: Facility Policy/Trauma Informed Care dated 8/23/23 documents: Upon admission the SSD (Social Service Director) will review hospital discharge records and interview the resident or resident's representative to determine any history of trauma. If the resident is determined to have suffered a traumatic event, the SSD will discuss with the resident or resident's representative regarding potential triggers that may cause re-traumatization and interventions or preferences that eliminate or decrease triggers that may cause re-traumatization. The IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) will develop a resident centered care plan that will identify the stressor, triggers, clinical manifestations, and interventions to mitigate against re-traumatization. The IDT will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic pain medication was available as physician ordered for a resident with a new rib fracture for one of four residents (R285) reviewed for pain in the sample of 40. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 11/18/17, documents, Drug administration shall be defined as an act in which a single dose of a prescribed drug or biological is given to a resident by an authorized person in accordance with all laws and regulations governing such acts. The complete act of administration entails removing an individual dose from a previously dispensed, properly labeled container (including a unit dose container), verifying it with the physician's orders, giving the individual dose to the proper resident, and promptly recording the time and dose given. If the medication is not available for a resident, call the pharmacy and notify the physician when the drug is expected to be available. 1. On 10/22/23 at 10:50 AM, R285 was alert and oriented sitting up in a wheelchair in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document behaviors to warrant the use of an antipsychotic and perform a GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction) for one of six residents (R24) reviewed for psychotropics in the sample of 40. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Policy, dated 11/28/17, documents, Any resident receiving such medications shall have a psychiatric diagnosis or documented evidence of maladaptive behavior, which can be considered harmful to themselves or others, destructive to property, or if emotional problems exist which cause the resident frightful distress. Residents who use antipsychotic drugs shall receive gradual dose reductions and behavior interventions unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue the drugs. Reductions shall be attempted at least twice in one year, unless the physician documents the need to maintain the resident regimen according to the Regulatory Guidelines for such. On 10/23/23 at 09:48 AM, R24 was alert…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were not falsified for one of one resident (R284) reviewed for falsified records in the sample of 40. Findings include: The facility's Progressive Discipline Policy, no date, documents, The Administrator is responsible for monitoring supervisory actions to ensure that corrective discipline is both communicated and equally applied by them to all employees. Critical Offenses: These offenses are serious violations of rules, or employee's misconduct which justify immediate termination without regard to the employee's length of service or prior record of conduct. The Notice of Termination would be completed for qualifying offense. Examples of critical offenses include but are not limited to: Deliberate omission or falsification of significant information on: Records. R284's Shower/Abnormal Skin Report, dated 10/7/23, documents that R284 had a shower on this date. The report was signed by V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant) that she assisted R284 with the shower. R284's Shower/Abnormal Skin Report, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a care plan to address a resident's behaviors for one of three residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning policy dated 7-20-22 documents a comprehensive care plan should be developed to reflect a resident's current medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs and should describe a need/problem indicating approaches/interventions to be instituted to assist the resident in maintaining/receiving care in relation to the need/problem. V7's (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) written statement (undated) documents, (R1) called (V4/CNA) a f*g b*h in the dining room. R1's Care Plan dated 8-22-23 does not include a plan of care with interventions to address R1's verbal behaviors. On 9-8-23 at 10:07 AM V8 (Social Service Assistant) stated, (R1) has behaviors of yelling and cussing at staff when he is upset. On 9-8-23 at 11:30 AM V1 (Administrator) stated, The facility has not developed a care plan to address (R1's) behaviors.
- No harm found · C2023-10-26 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Daily Nurse Staffing was posted in a clear and readable format and in a prominent place readily accessible area to residents and visitors. This failure has the potential to affect all 135 residents residing in the Facility. Findings include: The Facility Administrator Job Description, undated, documents V1's (Administrator) job duties including managing, directing, and coordinating the physical management of the Facility in an accordance with all established practices, laws, and applicable State regulations; managing and conducting business of the Facility in a manner that protects the Facility License and Certification at all times; and operate the Facility in compliance with all Federal and State rules and regulations. Resident Census and Conditions Report, dated 10/25/23, documents 135 Residents residing in the Facility. On 10/22/23, during the hours 6:00 am and 1:30 pm, and on 10/23/23, during the hours of 6:30 am and 8:59 am, the Daily Nurse Staffing was not posted in the Facility. On 10/23/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$458,614 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 3 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $26,685 — penalty dated 2026-04-30
- $21,548 — penalty dated 2025-05-20
- $72,459 — penalty dated 2024-09-25
- $185,705 — penalty dated 2024-02-14
- $115,837 — penalty dated 2023-10-26
- $36,380 — penalty dated 2023-09-13
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-19 for 25 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-15 for 67 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-21 for 38 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ARCADIA CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOLDFARB, BRIAN | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| MARTIN, LAURA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| MCCLURE, MICHELLE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| SEITLER, DOVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| GRONSKY, AMANDA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| ARCADIA CARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/12/2025 |
| LEE, NICOLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| BERKOWITZ, DAVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/26/2025 |
| MEYSTEL, YOSEF | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/26/2025 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| PETERSEN SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/17/2025 |
| AHEARN, MICHAEL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145418. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.