Arcadia Care On The Hill
555 West Carpenter, Springfield, IL 62702 · For profit - Corporation · 251 certified beds · (217) 525-1880 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $229,143 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-22)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.6% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.6% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 98.0% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.9% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.6% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.5% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.0% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.8% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 40.7% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.1% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.1% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.53 | 2.02 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.67 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
37.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 14.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 37.4%CMS range 27.9–54.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 7.2–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 14.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 2.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 16.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.7–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 251 beds and averages 121.2 residents a day — about 48% occupied, or roughly 130 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.80 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.17 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.88 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.22 to 0.07 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2025-09-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — widespreadEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure competency of the Professional Nursing staff for 1 of 6 (R5) reviewed for Professional Standards in the sample of 50. This failure has the potential to affect all 128 Residents residing in the facility.The immediate jeopardy began on 9/10/25, when V6, Registered Nurse (RN), failed to appropriately respond to an emergent medical event, when R5 displayed symptoms of medical distress and presented with a blood glucose level of 33. V6 failed to follow physician's order of administering Baqsimi (Glucagon) for low blood sugar, and instead disassembled prefilled Epinephrine and Narcan cartridges, combining pieces of both medication cartridges, and administered Epinephrine injection nasally. On 9/16/25 at 2:15 PM, V1, Administrator, and V2, Director of Nursing (DON), were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy. The surveyor confirmed by interview, observation, and record review, the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 9/17/25, but noncompliance remains at a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident in a crisis condition the correct medication for 1 of 6 residents (R5) reviewed for medication errors in the sample of 50. This failure resulted in the R5 not receiving his Glucagon when needed resulting in his blood sugar dropping to a critical low and being transferred to the hospital and subsequently admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9/10/25, when V6, Registered Nurse (RN), failed to appropriately respond to an emergent medical event, when R5 displayed symptoms of medical distress and presented with a blood glucose level of 33. V6 failed to follow physician's order of administering Baqsimi (Glucagon) for low blood sugar, and instead disassembled prefilled Epinephrine and Narcan cartridges, combining pieces of both medication cartridges, and administered Epinephrine injection nasally. On 9/16/25 at 2:15 PM, V1, Administrator, and V2, Director of Nursing (DON), were notified of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to monitor and supervise a resident with severe cognitive impairment for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed for supervision in the sample of 5. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 7/31/23 when the facility failed to identify that R4 was missing, last seen at around 11:00AM and discovered entrapped on the elevator at 10:30 PM. This Past Noncompliance occurred from 7/31/23 to 8/1/23. On 8/22/23 at 3:03 PM, the V1, Administrator, V2, Director of Nursing (DON) and V22, [NAME] President of Operations, were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: R4's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented R4 had severally impaired mental cognition, however, R4 recalls long term memory and not short-term memory but is able to speak and answer simple questions. R4's admission Record, dated 8/10/23, documented R4 had diagnoses of dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, heart disease and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to coordinate treatment care of a foot wound for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for wounds in the sample of 7. This failure resulted in a delay of treatment for R4, causing him to need more of his foot amputated due to the infection and lack of timely scheduling of the surgery.Findings include:R4's Physician Order Sheet (POS) for April 2026 documents a diagnosis of infective myositis, left foot; abscess of tendon sheath, left ankle and foot, other acute osteomyelitis, right ankle and foot; methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere; non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot with muscle involvement without evidence of necrosis, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, acquired absence of right great toe (9/19/2025), abnormal weight loss, hypertension and anemia. R4's POS documents an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement, and document fall interventions for 1 (R7) of 3 residents who was newly admitted to the facility with hospital documentation of multiple vertebral fractures from a previous fall prior to being admitted to the facility of 3 residents reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in an alert resident (R7) falling twice at the facility and being transferred to the emergency room where she received IV fluids and narcotic pain medication. She sustained 2 skin tears from falls and was transferred to the emergency room due to post fall lethargy. Findings include:R7's Undated Face Sheet documents she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including compression fractures of second and fourth lumbar vertebra, burst fractures of T11-T12 vertebra, falls, low back pain, abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle wasting and atrophy and lack of coordination.R7's Hospital Discharge Plan, dated 9/30/2025 documents she was in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely treat a urinary tract infection (UTI) for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for catheter care in the sample of 7. This failure resulted in R3 having a delay in treatment for a urinary tract infection and being admitted to the intensive care unit for septic shock. Findings include: R3's Care Plan, dated 1/9/2024, documents, I have Indwelling Catheter due to Obstructive Uropathy. Monitor/record/report to MD for s/sx (signs and symptoms) UTI: pain, burning, blood tinged urine, cloudiness, no output, deepening of urine color, increased pulse, increased temp, Urinary frequency, foul smelling urine, fever, chills, altered mental status, change in behavior, change in eating patterns. R3's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents R3 was cognitively intact. R3 requires assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). R3's Physician Progress Note, dated 3/27/2024, written by V8, Urologist, documents, Chief Complaint Patient presents in office…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to identify, treat, monitor and provide pressure reducing interventions for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 11. This failure resulted in R2 and R3 sustaining unstageable necrotic pressure ulcers while in the facility. Findings include: 1. R3 admission Record, print date of 1/10/24, documents R3 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses of Dementia, fracture of right femur, coronary artery disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R3 is severely cognitively impaired, requires substantial maximum assistance from staff for bed mobility and transfers and is at risk for pressure ulcers. R3's admission Assessment, dated 10/26/23, documents R3's does not have any pressure ulcers. R3's Braden Assessment, dated 10/26/23, documents R3 is at high risk for pressure ulcers. R3's Alert Note, dated 11/10/23 at 2:43 PM, documents, New skin condition will evaluate.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident safety, to document resident fall risk assessments before and after falls occur, and to follow interventions in place to prevent falls for 3 of 4 residents (R1, R3, R12) reviewed for resident safety in the sample of 13.The findings include: 1. R1's admission Record, dated 11/25/25, documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Encephalopathy, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), uropathy, disorder of kidney/ureter, morbid obesity, malnutrition, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), Urinary Tract Infections (UTI), major depressive disorder, anemia, atrial fibrillation (A-Fib), hypertension (HTN), legal blindness, adult failure to thrive, anxiety disorder, hallucinations, and schizoaffective disorder.R1's Care Plan, dated 11/17/25, documents R1 is at risk for falls related to impaired mobility due to morbid obesity. Interventions: 1/7/25: Bolsters added to bed as he is visually impaired so that he can…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of an expired Tuberculin vial and to safely secure medications in a medication cart while sitting in the hallway and available for all residents and visitors to get into. Reviewed for medication labeling and storage in the sample of 50. This failure has the potential to affect all residents living in the facility.The Findings Include: 1. On [DATE] at 10:18 AM, the Medication Cart on the end of the 200-hall was observed sitting in the hallway unlocked with no staff member around it. V7, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated, The Nurse had to go to central supply to get something and should be back soon. On [DATE] at 10:25 AM, V6, Registered Nurse (RN), came back to the cart and stated, The cart is broken, and we are waiting for the pharmacy to come fix it. We are unable to lock it and if we did, we can't get it back open. The drawers on the right side are locked, and we are not able to open those drawers, if needed, we have to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to use hair nets while in the kitchen, to provide paper towels for hand hygiene, to label food items stored in the refrigerator, and to dispose of expired food items. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility.The Findings Include:1. On 9/7/25 at 8:50 AM, while doing the initial kitchen tour, V18, Dietary Aide, and V19, Dietary Prep, were seen with no hair net on and upon surveyor entrance, both were seen going and getting a hairnet and putting one on.2. There were no paper towels available for handwashing at the handwashing sink.3. A large piece of ham was seen in the refrigerator wrapped in plastic wrap and undated.4. A large pan of sliced tomatoes was seen in the refrigerator covered in plastic wrap and undated.5. A pan of mixed vegetables was seen in the refrigerator covered in plastic wrap and undated.6. On the fourth-floor dry food storage room, there were three packages of hot dog buns that expired on 9/4/25.On 9/7/25 at 9:00 AM, V20, Cook, stated The items in the fridge should have been dated, especially since they are prepped and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement enhance barrier precautions and change gloves when soiled for 5 of 32 residents (R1, R4, R12, R40 and R121) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 50.Findings include: 1. On 09/09/2025 at 12:11PM V9 wound nurse and V16 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) entered R1's room. V16, CNA did not sanitize hands, don gloves, or gown prior to entering R1's room. Sign on wall beside R1's door documents enhanced barrier precautions. While standing at R1's bedside V16 sanitized hands and donned gloves. V16, CNA did not don a gown. V16 with gloved hands assisted V9 to roll R1 towards V16 for V9, wound nurse to do wound care to R1. Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign documents Stop, everyone must clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving room. Providers and staff must also: wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities. Dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, changing linens,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview, Observation, and Record Review, the facility failed to identify and treat a resident's wounds for 1 of 6 residents (R12) reviewed for wound care in the sample of 50.The Findings Include:R12's admission Record, dated 9/11/25, documents R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Furuncle of groin, Abscess of groin, Infection following a procedure/surgical site, Open wound to right lower leg, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Atherosclerotic Heart Disease (ASHD), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), and Hypertension (HTN).R12's Care Plan, dated 7/29/25, documents R12 has a potential for impairment to skin integrity related to decreased mobility. Interventions: Assess/record changes in skin status, follow facility protocols for treatment of injury, pressure relieving/reducing cushion to protect the skin while up in chair, pressure relieving/reducing mattress to protect the skin while in bed, use caution during transfers and bed mobility to prevent striking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to prevent and assess a pressure ulcer for 1 of 7 residents (R10) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 50. Findings include: R10's admission record, print date of 9/11/25, documents R10 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses of Multiple Sclerosis and Traumatic Brain Injury. R10's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents R10 is moderately cognitively impaired, requires partial to moderate assistance with dressing, toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. R10's Braden Observation, dated 6/6/25, documents R10 is at moderate risk for pressure ulcers. R10's Nursing Note, dated 7/17/25, documents, Writer obtained consent from resident for res (resident) to be seen and treated by (wound clinic). Services are to begin 7/24/25. R10's, undated, Wound Summary documents R10 has a Facility Acquired Pressure ulcer on the coccyx that was identified on 7/16/25. R10's, undated, Wound Summary documents on 7/21/25 R10's coccyx pressure ulcer was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to check for placement or residual of a Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) for 1 of 2 residents (R4) reviewed for G-tubes in the sample of 50. Findings include: On 09/07/2025 at 10:02 AM V3, Licensed Practical Nurse entered R4's room to give a 125 milliliter (ml) water flush. V3 turned off the feeding pump, disconnected the tubing from the G-tube and gave R4 a 125 ml water flush through the G-tube. V3 failed to check for residual.R4's admission Record, print date of 9/10/25, documents, R4 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnosis of gastrostomy status.R4's Physician Order, dated 8/16/24, documents, Enteral Feed Order every shift Enteral - Check Tube Placement before feeding, Flush and Meds (medications).On 9/11/25 at 11:54 AM, V3, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was questioned why she did not check for residual before giving the water flush. V3 stated, I checked for residual, then left the room, and then came back to give the water.On 9/11/25 at 12:17…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls in 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for falls in the sample of 6. Findings include: 1-R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, lack of coordination, and reduced mobility. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R2 was cognitively intact, ambulated with wheelchair, and was dependent for toileting. R2's Undated Care Plan documents R2 is at risk for falls and is dependent for toileting. R2's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documented R2 was at risk for falls. R2's 5/9/25 Progress Note by V25, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), documents, Writer entered room and noted resident lying on the bathroom floor next to toilet. Resident had BM (bowel movement) on the toilet and floor. Resident was assessed for injuries, vs (vital signs) taken, cleaned up dressed and continues visiting with family.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide supervision for 1 of 1 residents (R3) reviewed for supervision in the sample of 7. This failure resulted in R3 leaving the facility going to liquor store obtaining alcohol and being sent by ambulance to the hospital for evaluation. Findings include: 1. On 4/23/2025 at 3:52PM V1, Administrator stated R3 is alert and orientated. V1 stated R3 knows he is supposed to sign out. V1 stated R3 took his wonder guard off. V1 stated the police found R3 at 3:00PM and took him to the hospital. V1 stated R3's family or family friend will sign R3 out and take R3 out in community. V1 stated he was last seen in the building around 1 PM. V1 stated R3 had been drinking. V1 stated the facility did not know R3 was gone. On 4/23/2025 at 4:20PM R3 stated he got an attitude yesterday and left. R3 stated, all my folks have passed away and I am only one left. R3 stated he walked about 13 miles. R3 stated he walked over by Clear Lake and was sitting on a bench when police…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify Power of Attorney (POA) of change in condition for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for change of condition in the sample of 4. Findings include: 1. On 10/28/2024 at 10:29 AM, V3, R2's POA (Power of Attorney) stated she was not aware R2 was placed on an antibiotic and being treated for pneumonia until the facility notified her R2 was being sent out to the hospital on [DATE]. On 10/28/2024 at 11:00AM V1, Administrator stated R2's POA stated to V1 when she was notified R2 was sent to the hospital, she had not been made aware R2 was placed on an antibiotic for pneumonia. V1 stated V4, Registered Nurse (RN) stated she did not notify the POA of change in R2's condition. R2's chest x-ray report dated 10/21/2024 at 15:13 documents impression: right basilar opacity by one view, correlate clinically for atelectasis, chronic scarring, and/or pneumonia. R2's progress notes dated 10/21/2024 at 21:28 documents Xray services called with positive chest x-ray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 16 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store, label and date raw poultry and food, and failed to properly sanitize dishware, cups and silverware. This failure has the potential to affect all 109 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 07/15/24 at 9:45 AM, in the 1st refrigerator reviewed, on the top shelf was a zip lock bag with thawed out chicken not dripping on to other foods but there were cups of juices underneath the top shelf. There was also a sandwich that was dated 7/5/24. In the 2nd refrigerator, there was a tray, with fruit in bowls, covered but not dated and there were cups of red, jelled like substance covered but not dated. On 7/15/2024 at 9:55 AM, the dish machine was checked. A staff member was asked to check the chlorine and it was. The Chlorine test strip was reading zero after the 10 sec contact time. The dishwasher was leaking water all over the floor, the temperature gauze, glass was broken, and it read 120F even during a rinse cycle. On 07/17/2024 at 1:55 PM, the thawed out chicken and sandwich that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to A. follow its policy in order to prevent the potential water borne illness. B. don Personal Protective Equipment when providing direct patient care for (R58) residents reviewed for Enhanced Barrier precautions. This failure has the potential to affect all 109 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: A. On 7/17/2024 at 12:45 PM, V20, Maintenance Director, stated there are unoccupied rooms on the 1st and 4th floor of the Facility. V20 stated he lets the water run once a month to flush the pipes. V20 stated he does not document this procedure and stated, I just have to do it. On 7/18/2024 at 9:52 AM, V1, Administrator stated there is construction taking place on the 4th floor of the Facility, changing out plumbing and knows V20 has been flushing the pipes. V1 stated, Maybe he needs to develop a log to document the procedure is being completed. The Facility's Policy Water Management Program for Prevention of Legionella Growth dated 6/30/2017…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to accommodate smoking needs for 4 of 4 (R14, R47, R61, and R97) residents reviewed for accommodation of needs in the sample of 57. The findings include: 1. R14's care plan documented R14 requires assistance with transfers r/t (related to): Old CVA / MVA (cerebrovascular / motor vehicle accident) with limited use of left side. This plan of care is documented as being initiated on 04/23/2019 with interventions as follow: Teach me to transfer to: -bed -chair -toilet with a sit to stand and 1 staff per his request. R14 care plan also included that has a physical and psychological addiction to nicotine/smoking and smoking routine. Significant extended disruptions in smoking routine may cause physical and psychosocial/ behavioral disturbance. The Date Initiated for this area is 12/03/2020. R14's MDS (minimum data set) completed on 7/5/2024 documented R14 being cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and complete incontinent care, including hand hygiene, and glove changes, for 4 of 5 residents (R4, R25, R58, R97) reviewed for incontinent care in the sample of 57. 1. R25's Face Sheet, undated, documents R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), irritable bowel syndrome with Diarrhea, and Major Depressive Disorder. R25's Care Plan, dated 6/11/24, documents R25 has a bowel/ bladder incontinence related to disease process MS, Impaired Mobility, Physical limitations. Interventions: 12/14/21 Remove peri-wash from bedside table and encourage to call for assistance, apply barrier cream after each incontinent episode, check and change Q (every) 2-3 Hours and PRN (as needed), clean peri-area with each incontinence episode, complete bowel and bladder assessment upon admission, quarterly and as needed, encourage fluids during the day to promote prompted voiding responses, ensure call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide tube feedings according to the facility policy, including the proper labeling of the tube feeding, and the correct positioning of the resident during care for 1 of 2 residents (R58) reviewed for proper tube feeding in the sample of 57. The Findings include: R58's Face Sheet, undated, documents R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction with Monoplegia, Dysphagia, Aphasia, Gastrostomy, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hypertension, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease, and Major Depressive disorder. R58's Care Plan, dated 7/7/24, documents R58 has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care/mobility performance (functional abilities) deficit that may fluctuate with activity throughout the day related to Hemiplegia, Limited Mobility. Interventions: R58 receives all nutrition per tube feedings. R58 requires tube feeding related to dysphagia. Interventions:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to administer medications according to physicians' orders for one of 3 (R263) residents reviewed for medications in the sample of 57. Findings include: R263's face sheet dated 7/18/2024 documents admit date of 7/5/2024. R263 has diagnosis of intracerebral bleed, Alzheimer's, and Atrial fibrillation. R263's physicians admitting orders from hospital dated 7/5/2024 documents Seroquel 25mg half tab every day and Seroquel 25mg daily at bedtime. R263's admitting orders at facility dated 7/5/2024 document Seroquel 25mg half tab daily at bedtime for depression. Start Date 07/05/2024 at 8pm, D/C (discontinue) Date 07/11/2024, and Seroquel 25mg tab daily at bedtime dated 7/5/2024. R263's medication administration record dated 7/2024 documents that Seroquel 25mg half tab was administered at 8pm along with Seroquel 25mg at 8pm on the dates of 7/6/2024, 7/7/2024, 7/8/2024, 7/9/2024 and 7/10/2024. On 7/17/2024 at 10:00am V7 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated she had noticed when she was doing the consents that the orders on R7's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide the physician ordered pain medication for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 3. Findings include: R3's admission Record Form, undated, documented R3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Infection and Inflammatory reaction due to internal Left knee prosthesis. R3's Minimum Date Set, dated 1/30/24, documents R3 is cognitively intact. R3's Physician Order, start date of 1/23/24, documents, Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oral Tablet 5-325 MG (Oxycodone w (with)/ Acetaminophen) Give 2 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for chronic pain. R3's Nurse's Note, dated 3/25/2024 08:58, documents, Nurses Note Late Entry: Narrative: Placed an order to send oxycodone stat (immediately). R3's Nurses Note, dated 3/26/2024 09:00, documents, Nurses Note Narrative: per pharmacy oxycodone will be out in am delivery resident's pain assessed and an alternative prn (as needed) for pain offered. R3's Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide care for a wound requiring a wound vac for 1 of 2 residents (R2) reviewed for wounds, in the sample of 11. Findings include: R2's admission Record, print date of 1/10/24, documents R2 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses of Periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right knee joint, infection and inflammation reaction due to internal fixation device and dementia. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R2 is severely cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfer. R2's Physician Orders, dated 1/8/23, documents, If unable to Achieve Vac Seal, Remove Vac Dressing, Cleanse W (with) / Normal Saline & apply Wet to Moist Dressing until Vac Seal Can Be Achieved. R2's Physician Orders, dated 12/11/23, documents, Site: Right leg Cleanse with NSS (Normal Saline Solution), Pat and Dry, Apply Black Granu-Foam, apply wound vac at 125 mm (millimeters) / Hg (mercury) Continuous every day shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide complete incontinent care for 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R3) reviewed for incontinence, in the sample of 11. Findings include: 1. R3's admission Record, print date of 1/10/24, documents that R3 was admitted [DATE] and has diagnoses of Dementia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Hypertension. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents that R3 is severely cognitively impaired, is dependent on staff for toileting and personal hygiene, and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 1/9/24 at 12:55 PM, V3, Certified Nurses Aide, (CNA) and V5, CNA, transferred R3 from his wheelchair to his bed using a partial mechanical lift. R3's pants and incontinent brief were removed. The incontinent brief was mildly wet with urine. R3 was rolled over onto his side and his buttocks and rectal area were cleansed with peri-wash and then dried. A new incontinent brief was placed under him. R3 was rolled onto his back and his upper pubic area,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide incontinent care per professional standards or practice for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for urinary tract infections in the sample of 6. Findings include: On 11/15/2023 at 1:00PM, V11 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and V12 (CNA) toileted R2 in bathroom in R2's room. V11 removed adult diaper which was full of soft BM (bowel movement). V11 and V12 then sat R2 on the stool. V11 and V12 assisted R2 to stand and hold on to her walker while incontinent care was provided. V11 provided the care. V11 first cleansed R2's inner thigh then right and left groin. V11 stood in front of R2 and with washcloth and went from front to back. When washcloth was removed there was visible stool on washcloth. V11 repeated the process 2 more times, then rinsed R2. V11 then with clean soaped washcloth stood behind R2 and reached from front to back several times then rinsed R2 and the dried R2 with a towel. V11 stated it is hard to see with her standing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide palatable food. This has the potential to affect all the 98 residents living in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 09/12/2023 at 1145 am V14, Cook, uncovered all the food on the steam table. The temperatures were as follows at 11:50 am: Pork 161.6 Fahrenheit (F), white rice 185.9F, mixed vegetables 178.5 F, Gravy 182.6F, fortified mashed potatoes 167.3F, [NAME] Beans, 1st pan, 152.4 F, Pureed [NAME] 146.6F, Chicken Patty 163.3F, 2nd pan of green beans 172.4F, Pureed pork 143.6F and the 2nd pan of Pork was 150.8F. On 09/12/2023 at 1:03 PM, a test tray temperature was taken. The pork was 115F, rice was 120F and mixed vegetables were 115F. The pork and gravy were tough to chew and the rice was bland. The mixed vegetables were bright in color but were not seasoned. The dessert was an iced oatmeal cake but it was very sugary. The fruited pudding tasted like it was out of a can. 2. On 09/10/2023 at 9:28 AM, R89 stated the food could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to cover, label and date opened food items. Staff failed to perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves. This has the potential to affect all the 98 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 09/10/2023 at 08:30 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was performed and in the 1st refrigerator there was a white sauce that was not covered, not labeled or dated. On the 2nd refrigerator there was an open can of root beer that was not covered, not labeled, or dated and other drinks setting in refrigerator that were not labeled nor dated. On 09/12/2023 at 1145 AM, V14, Cook, donned gloves, without benefit of hand hygiene and uncovered all the food on the steam table. V14 then took a thermometer and checked the temperatures on all the foods on the steam table. With the same gloved hands, V14 served the lunch meal, having to stop periodically, to retrieve more plates and dish from warmer. On 09/13/2023 at 11:55 PM, V15, Dietary Manager, stated he would expect the staff to cover, label and date any leftover food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide showers, shave male residents, and provide nail care for 5 of 21 residents (R6, R35, R69, R78, R89) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living in the sample of 49. Findings include: 1. On 09/10/23 at 10:40 AM, R6 is lying in bed. R6's finger nails are extremely long on both hands. His face is full of whisker stubble. On 9/12/23 at 10:55 AM, V2, Director of Nurses, (DON), stated residents should get 2 showers a week. On 9/12/23 at 1:49 PM, V12, Certified Nurse Aide, (CNA), stated showers should be given every two weeks. V12 stated she does not have a problem getting her showers done. V12 stated on shower days if a resident needs their nails clipped or shaved, she will do it. V12 stated she usually does not care for R6 and he is an evening shower. V12 stated when she has been assigned R6, she uses hand gestures to get him to understand, because he is hard of hearing. V12 stated she gestures clipping the nails and shaving and then he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a signed Pneumococcal Vaccine Attestation Letter of Refusal for 4 of 5 residents (R5, R40, R57, R78) in the sample of 49. Findings Include: On 9/12/23 at 2:10 PM, V2, Director of Nurses, (DON), stated, she was unable to find the Pneumococcal Vaccine Attestation Letter of Refusal, for R5, R40, R57 and R78. V2 stated, she knows they were done, but she cannot find them. V2 stated, if a resident needs the vaccine, it should be offered every year even if they refuse. 1. R5's admission Record, print date of 9/13/23, documents, R5 was admitted on [DATE], is [AGE] years old and has a diagnosis of a history of a stroke and Dementia. On 9/12/23 at 9:00 AM, R5's Electronic Medical Record, (EMR), was reviewed and it failed to document R5's Pneumococcal Vaccine Attestation Letter of Refusal. 2. R40's admission Record, print date of 9/13/23, documents, R40 was admitted on [DATE], and is [AGE] years old with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 09/10/2023 at 11:31 AM all 4 walls in R17's and R61's room had peeling paint. On the ceiling there was a hole through the drywall and paint was also peeling. 3. R17's admission record, dated 09/13/2023, documented she was admitted to that room on 04/12/2023. 4. R61's admission record, dated 09/13/2023, documented she was admitted to that room on 06/16/2023. Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to maintain clean and comfortable rooms for 4 of 21 residents (R17, R61, R66, R85) reviewed for environment in the sample of 49. Findings include: 1. On 09/10/23 at 9:50 AM, R85's was lying in bed. The west wall area around the window air-conditioner and the window sill has multiple black spots. R85 admission Record, print date of 9/13/23, documents R85 was admitted on [DATE]. 2. On 9/10/23 at 8:55 AM, R66 room was entered. The wall mounted air-conditioner/heat unit does not have top grates on it. The coils are visible and could be touched by R66. The coils have visible trash and larger…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow through with ordered testing for a resident who had fallen and was complaining of hip pain for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for falls in a sample of three. Findings include: On 9-2-23 at 11:20 am, R1 was ambulating with a walker. R1 stated over a month ago, she fell out of bed hurting her left hip and groin. R1 stated her hip and leg hurt even with the medication she is given. R1 stated she has an appointment with a specialist coming up. R1's incident report and progress notes from 5-27-23 document R1 had a fall from her bed onto the floor. X-rays completed at the time were negative. R1's note dated 6-12-23 by V5's NP/Nurse Practitioner documents R1 was seen for pain in her left hip. V5 ordered an MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging). R1's June 2023 MAR/Medication Administration Record documents an order to schedule MRI for left hip/leg for pain post fall. There is no evidence in R1's electronic record that the MRI was completed. R1's progress notes documents on 6-23-23, R1 was sent to the hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$229,143 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $73,800 — penalty dated 2026-04-22
- $98,313 — penalty dated 2025-09-17
- $47,515 — penalty dated 2024-04-01
- $9,515 — penalty dated 2023-08-24
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-08 for 62 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ARCADIA CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAVID A BERKOWITZ DELTA TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/01/2024 |
| YOSEF MEYSTEL DELTA TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/01/2024 |
| SEITLER, DOVID | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| COOPER, BRANDY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| SIMMONS, TRACY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| MCCLURE, MICHELLE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| ARCADIA CARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/28/2025 |
| AHEARN, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| LIDDELL, JACKIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| FRANKEL, FREDERICK | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/08/2025 |
| GOLDFARB, BRIAN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/16/2026 |
| 555 W CARPENTER RD LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/28/2025 |
| ACI EQUITIES, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| HTI INVESTOR GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145160. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.