Arc At Trotwood LLC
5790 Denlinger Road, Dayton, OH 45426 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 127 certified beds · (937) 837-5581 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (73) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.0% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.1% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 36.8% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.7% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.0% | 25.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 41.3% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.3% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.6% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 27.7% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.9% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.0% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 38.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.0%CMS range 28.5–50.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 7.9–18.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 38.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 35.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 20.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 83.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.2–13.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.05 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 101.7 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
73 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 61 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2019-06-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, policy review and review of medication information from Medscape, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain was properly managed. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #24 experienced uncontrolled severe pain and had difficulty sleeping. This affected one (#24) of two residents reviewed for Pain Management during the survey. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include polyarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), muscle weakness, reduced mobility, need for assistance with personal care, systemic lupus, cardiac arrhythmia, major depressive disorder, type two diabetes, convulsions, anxiety disorder, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 had moderate cognitive impairment, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, with no noted behavior and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2019-06-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, review of facility policy and review of medication information from Medscape, the facility failed to ensure a resident on anti-coagulation therapy received adequate monitoring of blood coagulation time via laboratory testing as ordered by the physician. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #110 experience a critically high blood coagulation time after bi-weekly blood coagulation monitoring tests had not been completed over a two week period and subsequently required administration of Vitamin K to reverse the over-anticoagulation of the resident's blood. This affected one (#110) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of Resident #110's medical record revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses include presence of automatic cardiac defibrillator, coronary angioplasty, old myocardial infarction, acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify resident guardians of new physician's orders. The affected one (Resident #59) of three residents reviewed for participation in care planning. The facility census was 99 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 12/10/24 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, depression, and diabetes mellitus type two. Resident #59 had a court-appointed guardian of person since 2022 Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #59 dated 04/01/26 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and independently mobile. Resident had court appointed guardian of person since 2022. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #59 revealed an order dated 04/03/26 transcribed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #374 indicating the resident may leave the facility leave of absence (LOA). Interview on 05/18/26 at 1:46 P.M. with LPN #374 confirmed he transcribed a physician's order on 04/03/26 for Resident #59…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility investigation, review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI), staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of neglect to the state agency. This affected one (Resident #59) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 99 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 12/10/24 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, type two diabetes mellitus, and depression.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #59 dated 04/01/26 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and independently mobile. Review of the facility's investigation dated 05/01/26 revealed on 05/01/26 at 7:50 P.M. staff were unable to locate Resident #59. Staff initiated a search and implemented their missing resident protocol, which included contacting the local police department.Review of the SRI for Resident #59 dated 05/04/26 revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, physician interview, and policy review, the facility failed to transcribe and implement physician orders in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #102) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 99 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #102 revealed an admission date of 04/10/26 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasm of the lung, and a discharge date of 04/20/26. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #102 dated 04/14/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the physician's progress note for Resident #102 dated 04/16/26 per Physician #702 revealed the doctor gave telephone orders to Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #429 for the resident to have a chest x-ray, urinalysis, and complete blood count to be completed in two days.Review of the physician's orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and failed to ensure failed to provide the appropriate level of assistance during resident transfers . This affected two (Residents #59 and #103) of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility census was 99 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed admission date of 12/10/24 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, depression, and diabetes mellitus type two. Resident #59 had a court appointed guardian of person since 2022. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #59 dated 04/01/26 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and independently mobile. Resident had court appointed guardian of person since 2022. Review of the physician's order for Resident #59 revealed an order dated 04/03/26 transcribed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #374 for resident may leave the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility investigation, review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI), staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and complete. This affected one (Resident #59) of three residents reviewed for documentation. The facility census was 99 residents. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 12/10/24 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, type two diabetes mellitus, and depression.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #59 dated 04/01/26 revealed the resident #59 had moderately impaired cognition and was independently mobile. Review of the progress notes for Resident #59 dated 04/30/26 to 05/18/26 revealed there was no documentation that indicated the resident had left the facility without staff knowledge and without signing himself out and that his whereabouts from 05/01/26 to 05/18/26 were unknown.Review of the facility's investigation dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen was kept in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all the residents who received trays from the kitchen, the facility identified two residents (#108 and #125) who did not receive meal trays. The facility census was 102. Findings include:Observation on 02/10/26 at 7:40 A.M. of the kitchen revealed grease had run down the grill from the drip pan into a metal pan and onto some towels on the floor. The observation revealed the drip pan had overflowed and the grease along the grill and in the metal pan and towels had solidified.Interview on 02/10/26 at 7:45 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #108 confirmed the drip pan for the grill had overflowed and the grease had run down the grill into a metal pan and towels on the floor. DM #108 stated the handle to the drip pan had been broken for about four months. DM #108 stated usually maintenance would come to the kitchen daily to open the drip pan for the kitchen staff so the drip pan could be emptied. DM #108 confirmed the drip pan had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an Automated External Defibrillator (AED) device had new pads available for use in the event of a medical emergency. This had the affect on 18 out 19 residents the facility identified as a full code on the Rehab Hall. The census was 102. Findings include: Observation on 01/29/26 at 12:01 P.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) of crash cart on Rehab Hall revealed AED (a portable life-saving device) was lying on top of crash cart with no pads connected to the AED. Observations revealed no pads were in the compartments of the AED or in the crash cart. On top of the crash cart was an items listed for daily checks. All items were checked off daily. There were no check off box to check AED for working order or if pads were in place. Interview on 01/29/26 at time of finding with revealed ADON verified no pads for AED were ready available. The facility confirmed 18 out of the 19 residents on the Rehab Hall are Full Code and this is the crash cart/AED that would be used in the event of an emergency or code…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify family of a resident's change of condition and/or regarding new physician orders. This affected one (#114) out of three residents reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Record review for Resident #114 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: anoxic brain damage, human immunodeficiency virus, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, heart failure, tracheostomy, and sepsis. Resident #114 was Full Code. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Medicare 5-day revealed this resident had impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99. Unable to respond, Trach, pain regiment, feeding tube, pressure ulcer, continuous oxygen therapy, hemodialysis, anticoagulant, anticonvulsant. Review of progress notes for Resident for Resident #114 on 01/28/26 Licensed Practical Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure baths/showers were offered or completed as scheduled. This affected two (#85 and #112) out of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 102. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an admission date of 03/28/25 with medical diagnoses of cirrhosis of the liver, left above the knee amputation, diabetes mellitus (DM). Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/01/26, which indicated Resident #85 was cognitively intact and required supervision for toilet hygiene, transfers, and set-up for eating and bed mobility. Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed shower documentation from 01/02/26 to 02/06/26 indicated the following: 01/02/26 refused, 01/09/26 completed, 01/16/26 completed, 01/20/26 refused, 01/23/26 completed, 01/27/26 completed and 02/06/26 completed. Further review revealed no documentation to support…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observation, staff and resident interviews, review of facility incident/accident log, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure smoking/vaping devices were properly secured and not at bedside. This affected one (#85) out of three residents reviewed for smoking. The facility also failed to ensure a resident's fall was investigated and interventions were implemented and failed to ensure neurological checks were completed after a unwitnessed falls. This affected one (#115) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 102. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with medical diagnoses of cirrhosis of the liver, left above the knee amputation, diabetes mellitus (DM). Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #85 was cognitively intact and required supervision for toilet hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 61 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to administer medications as per physician orders. This affected one (#112) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #112 revealed an admission date of 12/09/24 with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the medical record for Resident #112 revealed an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/11/25, indicated Resident #112 was cognitively intact and was independent with eating, bed mobility, toileting hygiene, and set-up assistance with showers and transfers. Review of the medical record for Resident #112 revealed a physician order dated 12/09/24 for metformin 500 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth two times per day, orders dated 12/10/24 for ferrous sulfate 325 mg one tablet by mouth daily, loratadine 10 mg one tablet by mouth daily, Theragran-M one tablet by mouth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to administer insulin as ordered and to ensure blood pressure medications were administered per the ordered parameters resulting in significant medication errors. This affected one (#64) out of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 10/18/25 with medical diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), and end stage renal disease (ESRD). Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/31/25, which indicated Resident #64 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximum assistance with toilet hygiene and bathing, was dependent upon staff for transfers, and required supervision with bed mobility. Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed a physician order dated 10/20/25 for midodrine 10 mg one tablet via…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record and facility policy review, the facility failed to securely store medications. This affected one resident (#57) of five reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 89.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 01/22/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to dysphagia following cerebral infarction, type two diabetes, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affected the non-dominant side. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #57 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #57 required set up assistance for eating. Resident #57 was totally dependent on staff for toileting, transfers and bed mobility.Review of the physician orders for Resident #57 revealed an order stating resident required assistance from staff to complete self-care and mobility due to hemiplegia dated 06/17/25 and an order for Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Suspension 50 micrograms two spray in both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was accurate. The facility documented medication as administered by facility staff when it was self-administered by the resident without nursing supervision. This affected one resident (#57) of five reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 89.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 01/22/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to dysphagia following cerebral infarction, type two diabetes, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affected the non-dominant side. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #57 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #57 required set up assistance for eating. Resident #57 was totally dependent on staff for toileting, transfers and bed mobility.Review of the physician orders for Resident #57 revealed an order stating resident required assistance from staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a way to avoid cross contamination. This affected one resident (#86) of five residents observed during medication administration. The Facility census was 89. Findings Include: Medical record review for Resident #86 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, epilepsy, and nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #86 dated 08/12/25 revealed intact cognition. Resident #86 required set up assistance to moderate assistance for activities of daily living. Review of the physician orders for Resident #86 for the month of August 2025 revealed resident had an order for Aspirin enteric coated delayed release 81 milligram (mg) tablet, give one tablet one time a day dated 12/15/24. Observation of medication pass on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify residents that the amount of funds in their accounts was 200 dollars less than the Medicaid resource limit and that the residents may lose eligibility for Medicaid. This affected six (#10, #43, #5, #29, #27 and #11) out of seven residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 97. Findings include: On 05/21/25 at 12:11 PM, during review of the list of resident funds documentation provided by the facility during the survey it was noted that Resident #10, #43, #5, #29, #27 and #11 were all Medicaid recipients and all had balances over $2,000 dollars in their funds accounts. Interview with Business Office Manager (BOM) #4 confirmed Resident #10, #43, #5, #29, #27 and #11 were Medicaid recipients and their balances were over the maximum amount allowed by Medicaid. BOM #4 was asked to provide spend down notification letters that were sent to the residents. BOM #4 stated that there were no spend down notification letters sent to the residents. BOM #4 stated that letters were on her desk but have not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 92 days of the prior MDS assessment for 1 (Resident #49) of 9 residents reviewed for the resident assessment task. In addition, the facility failed to ensure quarterly MDS assessments were signed as complete within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) for 3 (Residents #4, #34, and #46) of 9 residents reviewed for the resident assessment task. Findings included: A facility policy titled, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, revised 10/2023, revealed, Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. The policy specified, 2. Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual. The CMS Long-Term Care Facility RAI 3.0…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to resolve a concern in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #66) of 2 residents reviewed for grievances. In addition, the facility failed to document concerns, ensure resolution, and provide feedback for 1 (Resident #57) of 2 residents reviewed for grievances. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Grievances, effective 03/2024, revealed, Purpose: To ensure prompt resolution of all grievances with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other residents, and other concerns regarding their stay at this campus. The Grievances policy specified, Grievances may be filed orally (meaning spoken), in writing, or anonymously. The policy revealed, Every effort shall be made to resolve grievances in a timely manner, usually within 5 business days (excludes weekends and holidays). 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #66 on 03/07/2025. According to the admission Record,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded related to the use of a non-invasive mechanical ventilator for 1 (Resident #57) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory services. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, revised 11/2019, indicated, Any person completing a portion of the Minimum Data Set/MDS (Resident Assessment Instrument) must sign and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment. The policy revealed, 3. The information captured on the assessment reflects the status of the resident during the observation (look-back) period for that assessment. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #57 on 07/02/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sleep apnea, lobar pneumonia, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) accurately reflected all diagnosed mental disorders and prescribed psychotropic medications for 2 (Resident #16 and Resident #92) of 4 residents reviewed for PASARR requirements. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Preadmission Screening and Annual [sic] Resident Review (PASARR), effective 03/2024, indicated, It is the policy to screen all potential admissions on an individualized basis. As part of the preadmission process, the facility participates in the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screening process (Level I) for all new and readmissions per requirement to determine if the individual meets the criterion for mental disorder (SMI/SMD) [serious mental illness/serious mental disorder], intellectual disability (ID) or related condition. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility originally admitted Resident #16 on 02/21/2025 and most recently admitted the resident on 04/19/2025. According to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff documented the administration of medications in accordance with acceptable standards of practice. Specifically, staff documented the administration of medication prior to actually administering the medication for 1 (Resident #57) of 4 residents observed during medication administration. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Administration Policy, revised 01/2015, revealed the section titled, I. Level of Responsibility, included, - Licensed nurse (RN [registered nurse], LPN [licensed practical nurse]) may; a) prepare, b) administer, and c) record the administration of medications. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #57 on 07/02/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of cerebral palsy, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/23/2025, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff checked for incontinence every two hours and provided incontinence care when indicated for 1 (Resident #57) 1 sampled resident reviewed for urinary tract infections. Specifically, during the dayshift on 05/15/2025, Resident #57 was not checked for incontinence or provided incontinence care until 10:40 AM. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Incontinence Care, dated 10/2024, indicated, Purpose: To prevent excoriation and skin breakdown, discomfort and maintain dignity. Guidelines: Incontinent resident will be checked periodically in accordance with the assessed incontinent episodes or approximately every two hours and provided perineal and genital care after each episode. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #57 on 07/02/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection, overactive bladder, and dementia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide residents with food at an appetizing temperature for 1 (Resident #5) of 20 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Food Temp [Temperature] Point of Service Guidelines, updated 11/2024, revealed, Food will be served at an appropriate and palatable temperature for hot food items equal to or greater than 115-120 degrees Fahrenheit per stated guidelines F483.60: Proper 'safe and appetizing temperature' means both appetizing to the resident and minimizing the risks for scalding and burns. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #5 on 06/04/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of end stage renal failure. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/07/20255, revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS revealed Resident #5 required setup or clean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records were accurate and complete for 2 (Resident #57 and Resident #204) of 22 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medical Record Policy, revised 06/2022, revealed, It is the policy of this facility that an organized, accurate and complete written record will be maintained for each resident in accordance with applicable State and Federal guidelines and laws. The Standards section of the policy revealed, 1. The Director of Nursing/designee with the support of the Medical Records Technician shall assure that medical records are maintained in accordance with the facility/s [sic] policies and procedures, and applicable federal and state regulations. Further review revealed, 6. The resident record shall contain at least the following information: k. Record of Medications and Treatments. Medication and treatment records, including records of oxygen administration, alcoholic beverages, skin treatments, catheter/ostomy care, etc. [et cetera, and so…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a way to avoid transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, facility staff touched resident medications with their bare hands when administering medication, which affected 2 (Resident #20 and Resident #57) of 4 residents observed during medication administration. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Infection Control Program, revised 11/2017, revealed, 1. The facility has established an Infection Control Program which addresses all phases of the organization's operation to reduce or prevent the risks of nosocomial infections in residents and healthcare workers. A facility policy titled, Medication Administration Policy, revised 01/2015, revealed it did not include a procedure of medication administration of oral medications. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #20 on 04/14/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of a history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident who developed pressure ulcers while residing in the facility. This affected one (#30) out of the three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care and services. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 08/31/24 with medical diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus, history of cerebral infarction, dysphagia, hypertension, and hypothyroidism. Review of the medical record revealed a discharge date of 10/16/24. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/09/24, which indicated Resident #30 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #30 required supervision/touching assistance with eating and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene and transfers and required substantial/maximum assistance for bathing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures while performing wound care. This affected one (#11) out of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 06/04/24 with medical diagnoses of end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, obesity, right sided hemiparesis, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #11 had moderate cognitive impairment and required substantial/maximum staff assistance for toilet hygiene, bathing, and bed mobility and was dependent upon staff for transfers. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed a skin assessment, dated 10/15/24, which indicated Resident #11 had a deep tissue injury (DTI) to left heel which measured 2 centimeters (cm) by 2 cm with 100%…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, review of self-reported incidents (SRIs) and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one (#51) resident of the three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 03/14/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #51 was cognitively intact. Review of the facility's SRI dated 07/26/24 at 2:23 P.M., revealed Resident #52's relative stole a check from Resident #51 and cashed it. Resident #51 reported Resident #52 had a niece that wrote a check out to Resident #52's account. Resident #51 was assisted to the bank to file a fraud claim and called the police to file a report. Resident #52''s niece had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's urine collection bag was covered with a privacy bag. This affected one (#13) of one resident observed with an indwelling catheter and an urine collection bag. The facility identified three (#13, #14, and #15) residents with indwelling catheters. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 02/07/20, with medical diagnoses of dementia, conversion disorder with seizures, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and hypertension. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/15/24, which indicated Resident #13 had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, and had an indwelling catheter in place. Review of Resident #13's physician orders revealed a physician order dated 07/09/24, for skilled nursing to exchange 16 French suprapubic tube monthly and to flush suprapubic catheter with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of a medical record, the facility failed to maintain flooring in resident rooms in a safe and homelike manner. This affected one (#17) of seven residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 68 Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 01/05/24 with diagnoses of acute encephalopathy, pressure ulcer of both feet, stage three (full-thickness skin loss), and sepsis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was cognitively intact, required set-up assistance for eating, supervision assistance for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, and wheelchair mobility, and required partial assistance for bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. Observation on 06/25/24 at 11:00 A.M. of Resident #17's bedroom noted two areas of missing flooring by the foot of the bed measuring approximately three inches long by six inches wide by 0.5 inches…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to maintain mechanical equipment in a safe operating condition. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Observation of the laundry room on 05/28/24 at 8:47 A.M. with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) # 300 revealed the facility had three dryers in use for resident laundry. All three dryers had a thick layer of lint on the vents. Interview on 05/28/24 at 8:47 A.M. with MS #300 confirmed the lint on all three dryer vents was very thick and it appeared they had not been cleaned for several loads or possibly even several days of use. MS #300 confirmed the vents should be cleared of lint after each load of laundry. MS #300 confirmed the facility should have a lint cleaning log in the laundry with signatures of staff to verify cleaning of the vents after each load, but the facility did not have a record of the dryer vent cleaning. Interview on 05/28/24 at 8:49 A.M. with Laundry Worker (LW) #302 confirmed he had completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of the facility policy, and review of Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS), the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 75 residents residing at the facility. The facility identified one (Resident #50) who did not receive food from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Initial tour of the facility kitchen on 05/28/24 at 8:57 A.M. with Dietary Director (DD) #301 revealed there was a large hole in the floor with a missing floor tile at the end of the tray line counter. There was rust and metal flaking off the end of the tray line counter that was used for food preparation. The tray line counter also had food debris and splatter running down the side. The trash cans located in the kitchen had food splatter running down the sides and did not have lids on them. There was black dirt, black smudge, and food debris all along the walls and under the appliances. There were grease stains on the front of the oven. There was a large container of oven and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely a assess and treat resident injuries following falls. This affected one (Resident #67) resident of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 76 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 10/25/23 with diagnoses including pulmonary hypertension and chronic kidney disease. Review of the care plan for Resident #67 dated 11/01/23 revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to new surroundings, impaired safety awareness, and history of falls. Interventions included the following: anticipate and meet the resident's needs, ensure call light was within reach, keep personal items within reach, monitor for behavior changes, monitor for side effects from medications. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #67 dated 04/13/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition, was dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to adequately assess and treat resident pain following a fall. This affected one (Resident #67) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 10/25/23 with diagnoses including pulmonary hypertension and chronic kidney disease. Review of the care plan for Resident #67 dated 11/01/23 revealed the resident had the potential for pain/alteration in comfort related to osteoarthritis, weakness, and history of falls. Interventions included the following: monitor need for scheduled analgesics, evaluate the effectiveness of pain intervention, review for compliance, alleviating of symptoms, dosing schedules and residents satisfaction with results, impact of functional ability and impact on cognition, monitor/document for probable cause of each pain episode, remove/limit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate incontinence care in a sanitary manner. This affected one (Resident #13) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 07/02/23 with diagnoses including cerebral palsy, heart failure, schizoaffective disorder, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #13 dated 04/17/24 the resident had intact cognition was dependent on staff with toileting and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the physician's order for Resident #13 revealed an order dated 05/03/24 for staff to apply zinc oxide topical ointment to the peri-area and buttocks after each incontinent episode. Observation of incontinence care on 05/28/24 at 1:09 P.M. for Resident #13 per State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) #10 and #11 revealed the resident's incontinence brief was heavily saturated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to assess a resident's fall risk upon admission to the facility. This affected two (#5 and #84) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 81. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 09/26/23 with medical diagnoses of cerebral infarction, Parkinsonism, schizoaffective disorder, and hemiparesis. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/15/24, which indicated Resident #5 was cognitively intact and required supervision for eating, maximum staff assistance for toilet hygiene, transfers, and bed mobility and was dependent upon staff for bathing. The MDS indicated Resident #5 had two or more falls without injury since the last assessment. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed a Nursing admission Assessment, dated 09/27/24, which stated the unable to determine fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe and homelike environment. This affected one (#27) resident out of the three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 81. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 12/21/23 with medical diagnoses of congestive heart failure, bipolar disease, dementia, and hypertension. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/28/23, which indicated Resident #27 was cognitively intact and required maximum staff assistance with toilet hygiene, moderate staff assistance with transfers, and supervision with eating and bed mobility. Observation on 03/21/24 at 10:50 A.M. of Resident #27 revealed the resident lying in bed. Resident #27's room was noted to have five floor tiles broken with sections of each tile missing, a soap dispenser hanging off the wall near the sink, and wires exposed from the bottom of the heating register which was located near Resident #27's bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to ensure non-pressure ulcer skin conditions were appropriately assessed and monitored. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure treatments were implemented for non-pressure ulcer skin conditions. This affected one (#9) out of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 86. Findings include : Review of medical record for Resident #9 revealed admission date of 12/05/23. Diagnoses include pneumonia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and anemia. The resident was discharged on 12/24/23. The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was independent for eating and bed mobility and refused transfers. Record review of the 12/05/23 admission wound assessment for Resident #9 revealed an arterial ulcer to the right second toe measuring 1.3 centimeters (cm) by (x) 1.4 cm x 0.1 cm. A second wound was documented as excoriation to the right chest measuring 2.7 cm x 3.0 cm. A third wound was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and review of medication information from Medscape, the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered as physician ordered resulting in significant medication errors. This affected two (#16 and #40) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #40 revealed admission date of 09/21/23. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including asthma, depression, and stage four kidney disease. The resident remains in the facility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight indicating impaired cognition. He required set up assistance for eating, moderated assistance for bed mobility and was dependent on transfers. Record review of the physician orders revealed an order to give six units of Humalog (short acting insulin) subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime every day with a start…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were given routine showers/bathes for three (#86, #88, and #114) residents out of four residents reviewed for showers/bathes. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure fingernail care was completed for one (#86) resident out of the four reviewed for fingernail care. The facility census was 77. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #86 revealed an admission date of 12/20/16 with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension (HTN), and stroke with hemiparesis. Review of the medical record for Resident #86 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #86 had moderate cognitive impairment and required partial to moderate staff assistance with toileting, transfers, bathing and substantial to maximum staff assistance for personal hygiene. Review of the medical record for Resident #86…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected two (#94 and #114) out of the four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 77. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 09/12/23 with medical diagnoses of lumbago with sciatica, left and right sides, diabetes mellitus (DM), congestive heart failure, hypothyroidism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and morbid obesity. Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #94 was cognitively intact and required supervision with bathing, dressing, and bed mobility. The MDS indicated Resident #94 received insulin injections, a diuretic, an opioid, and an antibiotic during the reference period. Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed physician orders dated 09/15/23 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a police report, review of concern reports, staff interview, resident interview, review of self-reported incidents (SRIs), and policy review, the facility failed to report resident allegations of abuse and misappropriation to the State Survey Agency. This affected two (#21 and #71) of the six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 12/05/16 with medical diagnoses of neoplasm of the nasopharynx, chronic kidney disease stage III, and hypothyroidism. The medical record revealed Resident #71 was discharged on 07/09/23. Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #71 was cognitively intact, required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, and was dependent for eating. Review of a facility form titled, Report of Concern, dated 07/13/23, completed by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, review of concern forms, review of a police report, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and misappropriation. This affected two (#21 and #71) of the six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 12/05/16 with medical diagnoses of neoplasm of the nasopharynx, chronic kidney disease stage III, and hypothyroidism. The medical record revealed Resident #71 was discharged on 07/09/23. Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #71 was cognitively intact, required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, and was dependent for eating. Review of a facility form titled, Report of Concern, dated 07/13/23, completed by LSW #100 revealed Resident #71's spouse reported concerns that a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete quarterly care conferences to ensure the resident and resident representative was involved in care planning decisions. This affected three (#38, #50, and #71) of six residents reviewed for participation in their plan of care. The census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 12/05/16 with medical diagnoses of neoplasm of the nasopharynx, chronic kidney disease stage III, and hypothyroidism. The medical record revealed Resident #71 was discharged on 07/09/23. Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/06/23, which indicated Resident #71 was cognitively intact, required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, and was dependent for eating. The medical record revealed the facility completed quarterly MDS assessments with ARDs on 12/05/22 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a safe and effective manner. This affected one (#41) of the four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 68. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 06/09/23 with medical diagnoses of right sided hemiparesis, hypertension, hypothyroidism, anxiety, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/13/23, which indicated Resident #41 was cognitively intact and dependent for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and bathing. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed no documentation to support a self-administration medication assessment was completed by the facility. Observation on 08/23/23 at 9:14 A.M. revealed Resident #41 sitting up in her bed with a medication pill cup sitting in her lap with four unidentified medications in the pill cup.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-07-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility time punches and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) coverage was provided for at least eight hours a day, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents at the facility. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the facility's RN documented hours from 06/04/22 through 07/20/22, provided by the Administrator, revealed four days in which the facility had a census of greater than sixty residents and did not have the required eight hours of Registered Nurse coverage. On 06/09/22, RN #390 worked 1.42 hours, RN #400 worked 0.67 hours, and no additional RN coverage was provided for 06/09/22. On 06/14/22, RN #400 worked 2.3 hours, and the Interim Director of Nursing, who was an RN, worked 4.0 hours over her scheduled time for a total of 6.3 hours of RN coverage on 06/14/22. On 06/16/22, RN #390 worked 0.62 hours and no additional hours for RN coverage was provided for 06/16/22. On 07/01/22, RN #390 worked 0.78 hours and no additional RN coverage was provided for 07/01/22. Interview with the RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-07-28 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and personnel file review, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNA). This affected two (STNA #155 and #190) out of three STNA's reviewed who were employed at the facility for longer than one year. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents at the facility. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of STNA #155's personnel file revealed a hire date of 03/01/21. Further review of the STNA's file revealed no evidence of an annual performance evaluation. 2. Review of STNA #190's personnel file revealed a hire date of 11/07/19. Further review of the STNA's file revealed no evidence of an annual performance evaluation. Interview with the Human Resources Manager (HR) #291 on 07/19/22 at 12:29 P.M. confirmed there was no evidence of an annual performance evaluation having been completed for STNA #155 and STNA #190.
- Potential for harm · F2022-07-28 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of a staff roster and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a full-time Licensed Social Worker was employed on a full-time basis. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the facility's staff roster revealed there was no Licensed Social Worker (LSW) listed as a current employee. Interview on 07/21/22 at 9:05 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed he believed the facility had been without a LSW since January 2022. Interview on 07/21/22 at 2:30 P.M. with the Administrator revealed there had been an LSW employed from 03/31/21 to 01/17/22. The Administrator reported an LSW was hired to fill the vacant position on 04/25/22 but resigned on 05/06/22.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. He was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, and cerebral infarction. Review of the significant change MDS assessment, dated 05/10/22, revealed Resident #68 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the nursing progress note dated 05/21/22 revealed Resident #68 was sent to the hospital for further evaluation following a fall. Review of the facility form titled Notice of Resident Transfer or Discharge, dated 05/23/22, revealed Resident #68 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. There was no evidence the facility provided the notification to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Interview on 07/21/22 at 2:30 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed there was no evidence of notification to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. His diagnoses included acute kidney failure, insomnia, cerebrovascular disease, depression, and diabetes mellitus two. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #24, dated [DATE], revealed he was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed he required assistance from staff with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #24's physician orders revealed an order for Trazodone (antidepressant medication) 100 milligram (mg), take one tablet by mouth everyday at bedtime and Sertraline HCL (antidepressant medication) 25 mg tablet give one and a half tablets daily at bedtime. Review of the Care Plans for Resident #24 revealed he had a care plan in place for depression with an onset date of [DATE]. Further review of the Care Plan for depression revealed a goal of showing at least one physical sign that stress is being alleviated by no episodes of uneasiness through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/19/21. admission diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, diabetes, heart failure, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and unspecified protein calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #64's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 was cognitively intact. The MDS revealed the resident required dependent two-person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed no evidence of a care conference having been held with Resident #64. Interview with Resident #64 on 07/18/22 at 1:44 P.M. revealed he had not been invited to nor had he attended any care conference. Resident #64 denied any staff discussion related to his goals or preferences in regard to his care at the facility. Interview on 07/21/22 at 9:05 A.M. with the Director of Nursing revealed the facility had no documentation of a care conference for Resident #64. Based on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to timely identify a pressure ulcer. This affected one (Resident #32) out of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed Resident #32 was discharged from the facility to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnosis included history of Coronavirus disease 2019, metabolic encephalopathy, anemia, and non-rheumatic mitral valve prolapse. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #32, dated 04/27/22, revealed she had impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #32 was totally dependent on staff for dressing, bed mobility, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Review of the the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #32 dated July 2022 revealed an order dated 07/13/22 to apply house barrier cream after each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not have access to hazardous substances. This affected one (Resident #24) out of one resident reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 06/29/22. His diagnosis included acute kidney failure, cerebrovascular disease, depression, and diabetes mellitus two. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #24, dated 07/19/22, revealed he was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #24 required assistance from staff with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #24 was independent with eating. Review of the Care Plans for Resident #24 revealed he had a care plan in place for depression with an onset date of 04/23/22. Further review of the care plan for depression affirmed a goal dated 07/26/22 to show at least one physical sign that stress is being alleviated by no episodes of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #27) out of two residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of prostate, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and chronic kidney disease stage three. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 05/19/22, revealed Resident #27 had intact cognition. Resident #27 was assessed to require extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene, and was totally dependent on staff for eating. Review of the plan of care dated 02/23/22 revealed Resident #27 was at risk for infection and trauma to the urinary tract due to indwelling catheter related to diagnoses of obstructive uropathy and prostate cancer. Interventions included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident meal intakes and weights were routinely monitored. This affected two (Resident #27 and #43) out of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. He was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged back to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #27 was then re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of prostate, obstructive and reflux uropathy, obesity, and chronic kidney disease stage three. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/19/22, revealed Resident #27 had intact cognition. Resident #27 was totally dependent on staff for eating. Review of Resident #27's Plan of Care dated 02/07/22 revealed the resident was at risk for a nutritional decline…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the appropriate emergency tracheostomy supplies at bedside and had oxygen tubing changed timely. This affected two (Resident #3 and #42) out of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record dated 09/13/17 revealed an admission date of 09/13/17. admission diagnoses included dysphagia, malignant neoplasm of nasopharynx, and acute embolism and thrombus of the lower extremities. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #3 required extensive two-person assistance for toileting, and required supervision with one-person physical assistance for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene. The MDS further identified the resident had a tracheostomy. Review of Resident #3's plan of care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to appropriately monitor and assess resident dialysis access sites. This affected two (Resident #15 and #43) out of two residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/14/21. admission diagnoses included end stage renal disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. Review of Resident #15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS revealed the resident required extensive two-person assistance for bed mobility and toileting. The resident required extensive one-person assistance for dressing, and personal hygiene. The resident required limited one-person assistance for transfers. Review of Resident #15's plan of care dated 07/18/22 revealed the resident received dialysis three times a week related to end-stage renal disease. Interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely implement a pharmacy recommendation which was approved by the physician. This affected one (Resident #64) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/19/21. admission diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, diabetes, heart failure, and unspecified protein calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #64's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #64's undated plan of care revealed the resident was at risk for ineffective breathing related to congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered. The plan of care revealed the resident was at risk for decline in mood and side effects due to the use of antidepressants. Review of Resident #64's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure a medications were stored appropriately. This affected one (Resident #24) out of one resident reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 06/29/22. His diagnoses included acute kidney failure, cerebrovascular disease, depression, and diabetes mellitus two. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #24, dated 07/19/22, revealed he was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #24 required assistance from staff with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #24 was independent with eating. Further review of the nursing progress notes for Resident #24, dated 07/18/22 at 11:25 A.M. revealed a bottle of Milk [NAME] (dietary supplement) and diclofenac gel (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) as well as artificial tears (eyedrops…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided dental services in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #50) out of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 01/04/22. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, glaucoma, and alcohol abuse. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/16/22, revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident was assessed to require supervision for eating. Review of the nursing progress note dated 03/30/22 revealed Resident #50 had a cracked tooth. The note indicated the resident was added to the list to see the dentist. Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed no evidence the resident saw the dentist after being placed on the list on 03/30/22. Interview on 07/21/22 at 3:14 P.M. with the Administrator revealed Resident #50 was on the list to see…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately document the administration of tube feeding. This affected one (Resident #27) out of one resident reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. He was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged back to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #27 was then re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of prostate, obesity, and chronic kidney disease stage three. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/19/22, revealed Resident #27 had intact cognition. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene, and was totally dependent on staff for eating. Review of the plan of care dated 06/17/22 revealed the resident required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to practice proper hand hygiene during a wound dressing change. This affected one (Resident #27) out of one resident observed for wound dressing changes. The facility census was 61 Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of prostate, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and chronic kidney disease stage three. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/19/22, revealed Resident #27 had intact cognition. The resident was assessed to require extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Review of the physician order for Resident #27 dated 07/17/22, revealed an order to cleanse right calf with normal saline, pat dry. Apply betadine moistened gauze, cover with dressing, and change two times a day. Observation on 07/21/22 at 3:06 P.M. of wound care for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to properly store resident medication. This had the potential to affect 46 resident's (#9, #16, #18, #20, #21, #22, #23, #27, #30, #32, #35, #36, #37, #38, #40, #46, #47, #52, #54, #56, #57, #60, #61, #66, #69, #70, #72, #74, #76, #77, #80, #81, #84, #92, #96, #97, #101, #103, #104, #105, #106, #110, #111, #422, #423, and #424) the facility identified as cognitively impaired and independently mobile and that could access the unsecured medications. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Observation conducted on 06/26/19 at 6:14 A.M. revealed medication sitting on the top of the counter at the nurses station at the entrance of the facility. Review of the medication revealed medications including Metformin (diabetic medication) 60 tablets, Trazodone (antidepressant and sedative) 15 tablets 50 mg each, Vimpat (anti-seizure/controlled substance) 28 tablets 200 mg each, Norco (narcotic pain medication) 30 tablets 5-325 mg each, and one bottle of Fluticasone (nasal spray) 50 micrograms.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to accommodate a residents needs by ensuring the call lights were made readily available to residents who were capable of using them. This affected one (#110) of 32 residents observed for access to call lights. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of Resident #110's medical record revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses include presence of automatic cardiac defibrillator, coronary angioplasty status, old myocardial infarction, acute embolism and deep vein thrombosis, history of pulmonary embolism ventricle tachycardia, unspecified atrial flutter, and unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance. The facility completed a minimum data set assessment (MDS 3.0) of the resident's cognitive and physical functional status dated 05/01/19. The assessment identified the resident a having moderate cognitive impairment, and requiring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely respond to resident concerns with missing personal property. This affected two (#24 and #93) of three reviewed for personal property during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 113. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including polyarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, muscle weakness, reduced mobility, need for assistance with personal care, systemic lupus, cardiac arrhythmia, major depressive disorder, type two diabetes, convulsions, anxiety disorder, and hypertension. Review of Social Services Progress Note dated 06/14/19 and again on 06/24/19 revealed Resident #24 had been reassessed and was upgraded to alert and oriented with a new BIMS score of 15, which revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Interview conducted on 06/24/19 at 2:47 P.M. Resident #24 stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-27 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide written notification of transfer when a resident was transferred out of the facility to the hospital. This affected one (#93) out of two residents reviewed for Hospitalizations during the survey. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including abscess of groin, muscle weakness, type two diabetes, anemia, need for assistance with personal care, end stage renal disease, heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, chronic ulcer of right foot, and altered mental status. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired with disorganized think and inattention behaviors continuously present. Review of Section E-Behavior revealed the resident had verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others and rejection of care noted one to three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments was coded accurately. This affected one (#115) of three residents closed records reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The census was 113. Findings include: Review of Resident #115's closed record on 06/27/19 at 2:00 P.M. showed the resident was discharged on 04/29/19. Review of the MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident's discharge was an unplanned discharge with return not anticipated to an acute hospital. Review of Nurse's Note dated 04/29/19 revealed discharge instructions were reviewed. The resident was provided with a five day supply of medications and 14 Oxycontin 10 mg tablets to take home. The resident verbalized understanding and was waiting for a friend to pick her up. Review of Social Services Note dated 04/30/19 showed the resident discharged to home on [DATE] with home health care services. Interview with MDS Nurse #467 on 06/27/19 at 2:32 P.M. verified the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive plans of care related for contracture care and management. This affected two (#15 and #59) of two reviewed for Positioning/Mobility. The facility census was 113. Findings include: 1. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia following cerebrovascular disease, chronic pain, major depressive disorder, contracture left knee, contracture of unspecified joint, and subluxation of left shoulder joint. The facility completed a quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS 3.0) of Resident #15's cognitive and physical functional status dated 05/15/19. The 05/15/19 assessment identified the resident as having good memory and recall, and required the physical assistance of one staff person to complete bed mobility, dressing toileting, and personal hygiene. The resident did not transfer or walk during the assessment period. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming related to nail care. This affected two (#59 and #24) of five residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. The facility census was 113. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hemiplegia following cerebral infarction, dysphagia, diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. The facility completed a minimum data set assessment (MDS 3.0) of the resident's cognitive and physical functional status dated 06/17/19. The 06/17/19 assessment identified the resident as having short and long term memory problems, severely impaired cognitive skills, and requiring the physical assistance of two staff for bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment, services, and devices to improve range of motion or prevent further decline. This affected one (#15) of two residents reviewed for Positioning/Mobility. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia following cerebrovascular disease, chronic pain, major depressive disorder, contracture left knee, contracture of unspecified joint, and subluxation of left shoulder joint. The facility completed a quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS 3.0) of Resident #15's cognitive and physical functional status dated 05/15/19. The 05/15/19 assessment identified the resident as having good memory and recall, and required the physical assistance of one staff person to complete bed mobility, dressing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to maintain the resident call system in good working order. This affected one (#37) of 32 residents observed for access to call lights. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility 04/27/18. Diagnoses include contractures of the left and right knee, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, peripheral vascular disease, need for assistance with personal care, left below the knee amputation, and repeated falls. The facility completed a minimum data set assessment (MDS 3.0) of the facility's cognitive and physical functional status dates 04/30/19. The 04/30/19 assessment identified the resident as having good memory and recall and requiring the physical assistance of one staff person for bed mobility and transfer. On 06/24/19 at 3:48 P.M. Resident #37 was observed and interviewed regarding call light function and use. He reported he was able to and did use his call light to alert staff when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-07 for 8 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ARCADIA CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OHIO SNF HOLDCO OP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/16/2024 |
| APERION CARE EXEC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 06/18/2024 |
| YG FH HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 51% | since 06/18/2024 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/18/2024 |
| ARCADIA CARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| GRUMAN, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| MCCLURE, MICHELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| PARTON, ADAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| FRIENDSHIP SNF PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/08/2025 |
| HUNTER, RACHEL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| WILBURN, JEFFRY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365309. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.