Arc At Dwight

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 152 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 87.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.66 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.71 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ a clinically qualified Director of Food and Nutrition Services. This failure has the potential to affect all 89 residents in the facility.Findings:On 6/14/2026 at 8:43 a.m., V7, Dietary Manager (DM), was actively supervising dietary services in the facility's kitchen. At this time, V7 stated that V7 serves as the full-time manager of the facility's food service department. V7 further stated that V7 had not yet obtained the qualifications of a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) or Certified Food Protection Professional (CFPP), nor had V7 completed equivalent training. V7 reported that V7 enrolled in a certification program in April 2026 and was currently working on the first lesson.On 6/16/26 at 10:24 a.m., V7, Dietary Manager (DM) denied:being a dieticianbeing a certified dietary managerhaving an associate's or higher degree in food service management or in hospitalityhaving two or more years of experience in the position of director of food and nutrition services in a nursing facility settingbeing a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-17 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) to notify residents of potential financial liability when Medicare covered services ended for three of three residents (R38, R67, and R97) reviewed for Medicare notification requirements on the sample list of 36.Findings include:R38's Beneficiary Protection Notification Review, provided by V14, Social Service Director, documents that R38 began a Medicare Part A covered stay on 3/4/26, with a last covered date of 5/15/26. The facility provided a SNF ABN for R38 signed and dated 3/5/26 but did not provide evidence that a SNF ABN was issued when Medicare Part A coverage ended.R67's Beneficiary Protection Notification Review, provided by V14, documents that R67 began a Medicare Part A covered stay on 11/12/25, with a last covered date of 2/9/26. The facility provided a SNF ABN signed and dated 11/26/25 but did not provide evidence that a SNF ABN was issued when Medicare Part A coverage ended.R97's Beneficiary Protection Notification Review, provided by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by another resident. This failure affected two (R23 and R71) of three residents reviewed for abuse in the sample list of 36 residents. Findings:The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting - Illinois Policy, dated November 2016 and revised March 2026, states that the facility affirms each resident's right to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff, and mistreatment. Accordingly, the facility prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents.The policy further states that the facility strives to establish and maintain a resident-sensitive and resident-secure environment. The purpose of the policy is to ensure that the facility takes all reasonable measures within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect resident's right to be free from resident-to-resident verbal abuse. This failure affected three of four residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for abuse on the sample list of four.Findings Include: The facility's Abuse and Prevention Reporting - Illinois Policy dated March 2026 documents each resident has the right to be free from abuse including but not limited to verbal abuse. Verbal abuse is the oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or families or within their hearing distance. 1. R3's Medical Diagnoses list dated April 2026 documents R3 is diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R3 is cognitively intact and had verbal behavioral symptoms at four to six times during the review period. R3's Care Plan initiated 11/24/25 documents R3 has a history of behavior problems related to poor impulse control. R3 also has a mood problem and is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect a resident's (R14) right to be free from sexual abuse by another resident (R15), protect a resident's (R12) right to be free from verbal/mental abuse by another resident (R11), protect a resident's (R8) right to be free from physical abuse by another resident (R3), and protect residents' (R2, R3) right to be free from physical abuse by another resident (R3, R2). These failures affect seven residents (R2, R3, R8, R11, R12, R14, R15) of 12 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample list of 15. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy dated December 2025 documents the facility affirms the residents' right to be free from abuse, including physical abuse, sexual abuse, and verbal abuse. This policy documents physical abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that does not occur by accidental means, sexual abuse includes unwanted intimate touching of any kind including the breasts, and verbal/mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to report allegations of resident-to-resident abuse to the administrator for four (R9, R10, R11, R12) of 12 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample list of 15. Findings include:The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy dated December 2025 documents verbal abuse includes oral and gestured communication towards residents, verbal abuse can be considered mental abuse and includes yelling, mocking, insulting, and ridiculing. This policy documents to consider resident to resident altercations as potential situations of abuse that should be investigated. This policy documents employees are required to report any incidents, allegations or suspicions of abuse immediately to the administrator or to an immediate supervisor who must immediately report to the administrator.1.) On 3/3/26 at 11:35 AM V6 Housekeeper stated V6 has witnessed R11 and R12 curse at each other a couple times and V6 witnessed them saying f* (expletive) you to each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement measures to prevent further abuse during an abuse investigation for three (R2, R3, R8) of 12 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample list of 15. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy dated December 2025 documents the facility will take steps to prevent potential abuse during the investigation and residents who allegedly abuse another resident will be assessed to determine the most suitable therapy, care approaches, and placement while considering the resident's safety and the safety of other residents. This policy documents the facility will take all necessary steps to ensure the safety of residents, including but not limited to separating the residents involved. 1.) The facility's Preliminary 24 hour Abuse Investigation Report documents on 11/28/25 at approximately 10:00 AM it was reported that a resident (R3) had touched R8's nose. The facility's Final Report dated 12/4/25 documents R8 pushed R3's wheelchair. R3 told R8 not to push R3. R8 told R3 I'll (R8) do what I (R8) want.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a care plan with problem, goals, and interventions to address behaviors of disrobing for one (R14) of 12 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample list of 15. Findings include: R14's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R14 has severe cognitive impairment. R14's Behavior Tracking dated 2/3/26-3/4/26 documents R14 had behaviors of disrobing on 2/3/26, 2/5/26, 2/19/26, 2/20/26, 2/23/26 and 2/24/26. The facility's Preliminary 24 Hour Abuse Investigation Report documents on 2/26/26 at 6:30 PM it was reported that R14 was in R15's room holding up her gown and R15 touched R14's breasts. V14 Certified Nursing Assistant Staff Interview form dated 2/16/26 documents V14 walked past R15's room and noticed R14 was in R15's room, as V14 entered R15's room V14 witnessed R14 holding up her gown and R15 had his hand on R14's breast. R14's Nursing Note dated 2/24/2026 at 10:24 PM documents R14 had increased confusion with hallucinations and R14 took her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement fall interventions and thoroughly investigate falls for two (R5, R6) of three residents reviewed for falls in the sample list of 15. Findings include: The facility's Fall Prevention Program dated January 2026 documents nursing staff are responsible for implementing and maintaining resident safety precautions, residents will be observed every two hours and provided care as care planned, residents will be transferred according to their care plan and fall interventions will be documented on the care plan. The facility's Transfers- Manual Gait Belt and Mechanical Lifts policy dated December 2025 documents to use a gait belt for one and two person transfers and the use of a gait belt is mandatory for all physical assisted transfers. 1.) R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R5 has severe cognitive impairment and requires substantial/maximal staff assistance for bed mobility and transfers. R5's Care Plan documents an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a mechanical lift transfer safely for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for transfers.Findings include:The facility Transfers-Manual Gait Belt and Mechanical Lifts Policy dated 12/2025 documents mechanical lift equipment shall undergo routine maintenance checks by the nursing and maintenance staff to ensure that the equipment remains in good working order.The Mechanical Lift User Instruction Manual dated 2020 documents the following: Safety Precautions: Please read and follow the safety precautions listed below. The operation and use of mechanical patient lifts is simple and straightforward. Following these few basic safety precautions will make lifting operations easy and trouble free. ALWAYS carry out the DAILY CHECK LIST before using the lift. Maintenance Schedule: All mechanical lift products are designed for minimum maintenance; however, some safety checks and procedures are required. A schedule of DAILY tasks is detailed below. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARCADIA CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $512K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL