Arc At Chillicothe

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 237 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 125 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 89.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.84 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.93 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a risk for skin breakdown received accurate skin assessments to identify a newly acquired pressure injury, provide a pressure injury treatment and physician notification promptly and ensure interventions were implemented timely and followed to prevent further injury to an unstageable pressure ulcer for one of four residents (R28) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 35. This failure resulted in R28 returning from the hospital with an unstageable pressure injury and going five days without a wound treatment order, physician notification, or any wound assessments. Findings include:R28's Census sheet documents R28 is an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE].R28's Medical Diagnosis List documents Acute Respiratory Failure, Morbid Obesity, Heart Failure, Anxiety and Depression, Difficulty in Walking, Localized Edema, Acute Kidney Failure, and Osteoarthritis in both feet.R28's Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide readily available grievance forms and failed to post grievance/complaint procedures in a prominent location throughout the facility. This has the potential to affect all 89 residents residing in the facility. The facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Form 671 dated 4/20/26 and signed by V1 (Administrator), documents 89 residents reside within the facility.On 4/21/2026 at 10:37 AM R15, R27, R37, R84, and R87 all stated they have never been shown how to fill out a grievance, where the grievance forms are located, how to fill one out anonymously, or who the grievance official is to turn the forms into.On 4/21/26 at 11:00 AM a tour was conducted with V1/Administrator asking V1 to show where the grievance forms are located for the residents and where prominent locations(s) are for the grievance procedure in the building. V1 could not locate the grievance forms herself and thought they may be located at each nurse's desk but was unable to locate them at this time. V1 stated, I am not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-22 · tag F0628 — widespread
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on Record Review and Interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident families are provided with a written notice of transfer when being transferred to the hospital. This failure has the potential to affect all 89 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:On 4/20/26 at 11:00 AM, R13 stated she has been sent back and forth to the hospital multiple times for numerous reasons, while in the facility.R13's current electronic medical record documents, R13, was most recently transferred out of the facility to the hospital on 1/4/26 and again on 2/28/26. This same medical record does not document that written notice of transfer was provided to the resident at the time of transfer.On 4/22/26 at 10:58 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) confirmed that R13 does not have any written notices of transfer, with a reason for why R13 was being sent to the hospital. V2 stated, We (facility) do not have a formal transfer form that is provided to the residents or their families. We notify the resident's family via telephone, but we do not have a form with the reason for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer bedtime snacks to six of six residents (R15, R27, R37, R84, and R87) reviewed for bedtime snacks in the sample of 35.Findings include:R15, R27, R37, R84, and R87 electronic health records do not contain documentation of R17, R18, R27, R30, R38, and R52 being offered or receiving bedtime snacks.On 4/21/26 at 10:45 AM R15, R27, R37, R84, and R87 were in the resident council meeting. R15, R27, R37, R84, and R87 all stated they are not offered bedtime snacks and would like them to have offered them.On 4/21/26 at 2:05 PM V12/Certified Nursing Assistant stated, I have worked at the facility since October 2025. I do not go around and offer snacks at bedtime to all residents who can have them. They can ask for one and we would get them for them, but we don't go around and offer them.On 4/22/26 at 10:58 AM V2/Director of Nursing stated Dietary staff provide a drawer of snacks located at each nurse's station where a resident can ask for a snack.On 4/22/26 at V3/Dietary Manager stated that a dietary aide is scheduled to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on Observation, Interview and Record review, the facility failed to report allegations of staff to resident mental abuse and neglect to the facility's abuse coordinator and the state agency for three of four residents (R13, R39, R72) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 35.Findings include: 1. R13's current Care Plan, dated 3/26/26, document R13 has a self-care deficit and requires assistance of one staff member for bed mobility and two staff members for transfers. This same care plan documents a plan initiated on 12/19/24 (R13) is at a high risk for abuse/neglect as noted from abuse screening related to depression. On 4/20/26 at 11:00 AM, R13 was sitting in her wheelchair in common area of the facility. R13 stated about three weeks ago she had an incident with a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) being mean to her and she felt like after she complained that the whole crew of staff was upset with her. R13 stated she cannot remember the CNA's name, but she knows it was in the afternoon time. R13 stated I asked her to help me get up and she refused to help. She said No. It hurt my…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on Observation, Interview and Record review, the facility failed to ensure an abuse investigation was conducted and residents were protected from alleged perpetrators of mental abuse and neglect for three of four residents (R13, R39, R72) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 35.Findings include:1. R13's current Care Plan, dated 3/26/26, document R13 has a self-care deficit and requires assistance of one staff member for bed mobility and two staff members for transfers. This same care plan documents a plan last updated on 6/12/25: (R13) is at a high risk for abuse/neglect as noted from abuse screening related to depression. On 4/20/26 at 11:00 AM, R13 was sitting in her wheelchair in common area of the facility. R13 stated about three weeks ago she had an incident with a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) being mean to her and she felt like after she complained that the whole crew of staff was upset with her. R13 stated she cannot remember the CNA's name, but she knows it was in the afternoon time. R13 stated, I asked her to help me get up and she refused to help. She said, No.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on Observation, Interview and Record review, the facility failed to ensure a residents Minnimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately to reflect insulin usage for one of 24 residents (R2) reviewed for MDS accuracy in the sample of 35.Findings include:On 4/20/26 at 1:55 PM, R2 was sitting in her room watching television. R2 stated she does have a diagnosis of Diabetes, but she is able to control it with oral medication. R2 stated she does not have to take insulin injections.R2's Physician Order sheet, dated 12/26/25 through 4/22/26 and includes current and discontinued medications, does not document R2 is prescribed an insulin category medication.R2's MDS assessments dated 1/2/26, 1/22/26 and 3/16/26 all document that R2 received one insulin administration in the last seven days.On 4/22/26 at 11:10 AM, V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ MDS coordinator) confirmed that R2's MDS assessments have been coded for insulin, and that R2 does not receive insulin. V18 stated, It was marked due to her order for Trulicity (injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)) which is a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's fingernails were kept clean and trimmed for one of one resident (R60) reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) in the sample of 35.Findings include:R60's admission Record documents R60 is a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following but not limited to, diagnoses: Senile Degeneration of Brain, Age-Related Osteoporosis, Frontotemporal Neurocognitive Disorder, Hypertension, Chronic Kidney Disease, Dementia, and Major Depressive Disorder.R60's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 2/25/26, documents R60 is severely cognitively impaired and receives hospice services.R60's current Care Plan documents R60 requires assistance of one staff assistance with personal hygiene.On 4/20/26 at 11:32 AM R60 was sitting in the dining room in her wheelchair at a table. All R31's fingernails were long (past fingertips), jagged, and had brown debris underneath. On 4/20/26 at 11:35 AM V4/CNA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement a range of motion program for two of two residents (R7 and R14), with known functional limitations, in a sample of 35. 1. R7's facility admission record documents that R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis, Paraplegia, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. R7's current Physician Order Sheet, dated April 2026 includes the following physician orders: No Weight Bearing to the right lower extremity; Ankle brace to the right ankle. R7's current Restorative Assessment, dated 2/9/26 documents R7 requires staff assistance for all activities of daily living, would benefit from a range of motion program, has a functional limitation in the bilateral upper and lower extremities and has paralysis in the bilateral upper and lower extremities. R7's current Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 2/9/26 documents R7 is alert and oriented with a brief interview for mental status as a 13 out…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to check gastric tube feeding residual prior to administering an enteral feeding for two of two residents (R9 and R34) reviewed for gastric tube feedings in a sample of 35.Findings include:1. R9's current Physician Order Sheet, dated April 2026, includes the following diagnoses: Dysphagia Following Cerebral Infarction; Gastrostomy Status and the following physician orders: Check tube placement before feeding, flush(ng) and meds (medications). R9's current care plan includes the following interventions: Check for tube placement and gastric contents/residual volume per facility protocol and record. On 4/21/2026 at 8:42 A.M., V8/Registered Nurse (RN) prepared to administer medications for R9. V8/RN applied a gown and gloves and entered R9's room. V8/RN connected a 60 CC (Cubic centimeter) syringe to R9's gastronomy tube, and without checking tube placement, flushed R9's gastrostomy tube with 30 cc's of water, added pre- mixed medications and administered 325 cc's of a prescribed formula, followed by 50 cc's of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to don the required personal protective equipment during high-contact care for two of five residents (R11 and R34) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 35.Findings include: 1.R34's current Physician Order Sheet documents EBP, enhanced barrier precautions. On 4/20/26 at 10:00am, V13, Licensed Practical Nurse, washed her hands and applied gloves. V13 opened the cap on the gastrotomy tube and flushed it with 30ml (Milliliter) of water. V13 then poured 60ml at a time of ordered enteral feeding to equal 240ml. V13 did not apply personal protective equipment before administering R34's enteral feeding. On 4/22/26 at 8:50am, V13 verified that R34 is on enhanced barrier precautions because of his gastrostomy tube. V13 stated that she did not put on a gown prior to administering R34's enteral feeding. On 4/22/26 at 11:30am, V17, Infection Preventionist, stated that the appropriate personal protective equipment is to be donned before any high-contact care. 2. R11's current Care Plan, dated 8/6/25, documents, (R11)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARCADIA CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $626K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL