Arc At El Paso
555 East Clay, El Paso, IL 61738 · For profit - Corporation · 65 certified beds · (309) 527-6240 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,994 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.3% | 13.4% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.8% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 91.7% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 28.5% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 32.7% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.7% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.1% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.2% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 53.8% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.7% | 26.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.2% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.65 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.62 | 2.22 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
37.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 37.0%CMS range 28.6–46.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 6.8–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.4–13.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 56.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.87 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.96 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to a resident identified as an elopement risk, who had been exhibiting an increase in verbalizations of exit seeking behavior. On the morning of 05/18/24, R1 removed his (elopement alert bracelet) and exited the facility unnoticed. R1 was later found propelling his wheelchair approaching a road containing a high volume of traffic. R1 was one of three residents reviewed for wandering/elopement in the sample of three. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. While the immediacy was removed on 07/10/2024, the facility remains out of compliance at a Severity Level two as additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the removal plan including their In-service training and Quality Assessment oversight. Findings include: The facility's 'Code Pink- Missing Resident/Elopement' policy (revised 04/2023) documents, The facility maintains a process to assess all residents for risk for elopement,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to serve hot foods in a sturdy bowl, this failure caused R8 to spill hot chili on her chest causing a burn with blistering that required treatment for one resident (R8) reviewed for a burn injury in a total sample of thirty eight. Findings include:R8's Medical Record documents she was admitted to the facility on Hospice services on 12/10/2024 with diagnosis to include but not limited to Congestive Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation and Dementia. R8's Medical Record documents she is cognitively impaired and has short term memory problems. Throughout the survey R8 did not recall the incident on 3/24/26 with chili. The facility's Incident dated 3/24/26 documents V19 (Registered Nurse) was called to R8's room by V15 (Certified Nurse Aide) during lunch time because R8 had yelled out and was found with chili down the front of her chest.R8's Skin-Other Skin Condition assessment dated [DATE] documents R8 had a new skin concern: burn. The Skin-Other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its abuse prevention policy for three of four residents (R2, R3, and R4) with abuse-related concerns. Findings include:1. R2 had an allegation that R2 had been called a racial slur. The facility knew about the allegation and moved R2 to a different room after administration was made aware. The facility did not provide documentation showing the allegation was reported to the State Agency, investigated, concluded, or followed up on. On [DATE] at 12:12 PM, V3/LPN stated concerns regarding R2's previous roommate (now deceased ) calling R2 a racial slur were brought to management's attention by V3. V3 stated, I advocated to have R2 moved to a different room because he was being called racial slurs by his roommate. I notified V1, Administrator, of the incident and that's why they moved R2 to a different room. I never heard anything else about it. Management does not follow up on concerns at the facility. This is an ongoing issue with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions by not cleaning a debris/grime covered exhaust vent located above kitchen food preparation area. This failure has the potential to effect all 55 residents residing in the facility.Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS] Form 671 [Long-term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid], dated 5/26/26, signed by V1/Administrator, document 55 residents reside in the facility. On 5/27/26, at 11:30 a.m., the exhaust vent, located above the kitchen's food preparation area, was covered with debris/grime. On 5/27/26, at 11:30 a.m., V7/Regional Dietary Manager confirmed the exhaust vent, above the food preparation area, should be cleaned. Facility Policy, entitled, On Tray Dietary Policies and Procedures Ceiling, Vents, document: Purpose: To ensure food safety. 1. Schedule with maintenance to complete the following. Remove all the parts of the vents that are removable (keep all the parts together) and wash, rinse, and sanitize in a proper location. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-28 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the lids of trash dumpsters, located outside, are closed/secure to prohibit pests/animals from gaining access to discarded food/trash. This failure has the potential to effect all 55 residents residing in the facility. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS] Form 671 [Long-term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid], dated 5/26/26, signed by V1/Administrator, document 55 residents reside in the facility. On 5/26/26, at 9:30 a.m., during the Initial kitchen tour, the two outside trash dumpsters were not secured as lids, on both were open. On 5/26/26, at 9:30 a.m., V8/Cook confirmed the trash dumpsters should have the lids closed.The facility's Pest Control Policy, effective 1/2026, document: Put garbage in sealed plastic bags before placing them in a covered, rodent-proof dumpster.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement an infection prevention and control system to identify, report, and manage infections and symptoms associated with communicable illnesses among residents; and failed to ensure proper disinfectant monitoring practices, including the use of testing protocols to verify acceptable disinfectant ranges and documentation of testing results for Legionella. These failures have the potential to affect all 55 residents who reside in the facility.Findings Include:On 5/27/2026 at 12:10 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) confirmed she has no log that track infections or symptoms residents exhibit daily to track communicable infections and diseases.On 5/27/2026 at 12:30 PM, V13 (Maintenance Director) stated the Water Management Program Committee Protocol items listed to be completed are not completed. V13 stated there is no chlorine test that the facility or water department performs on a weekly or monthly basis to test the disinfectant in the water. The shower heads and aerators are not disinfected every six months…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to include a resident's wish to eat in their room for 15 residents (R2, R4, R8, R11, R20, R21, R28, R32, R38, R39, R41, R47, R50, R53, R58) of twenty residents who have indicated that they wish to eat in their room instead of the main dining room for meals in a total sample of thirty eight. Findings include: The Facility's Comprehensive Care Plan policy dated 08/26/2025 documents The facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Throughout the survey the following residents were observed eating meals in their rooms during meal times: (R2, R4, R8, R11, R20, R21, R28, R32, R38, R39, R41, R47, R50, R53, R58) On 5/27/2026 V8 (Cook) provided a handwritten list of residents that usually eat their meals in their rooms instead of the main dining room. The list…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inspect and regularly check the mattress and bed rails for areas of possible entrapment for 3 (R2, R6, and R8) of 3 residents reviewed for bedrails in a sample of 38. 1. R2's Medical Record documents she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include but not limited to Morbid Obesity, Type II Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. R2's Medical Record documents she cognitively intact and makes her own decisions. Throughout the survey R2's upper half side rails on both sides were up while she was in bed. On 5/27/2026 R2 stated she used the side rails for turning in bed. R2's Side Rail assessment dated [DATE] documents the side rails do not restrict mobility or prevent independent functioning. R2's Side Rail Assessment documents the side rails are used for increased mobility in bed. R2's Medical Record did not document any Entrapment Risk assessment for R2's side rails. 2. R6's Medical Record documents she was admitted on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse from occurring for one of two residents (R10), reviewed for abuse, in a sample of 38. R10's facility admission Record documents R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Dementia, Anxiety and Depression. R10's current Care Plan, dated 3/23/26 documents R10 has the following Focus Areas: Behavior Problems due to anxiety, wandering, yelling at staff; Wandering/poor safety awareness and Impaired Communication. The facility report, Final Abuse Investigation Report, dated Initial Report: 4/14/26 and Final Report: 4/20/26. At 6:25 P.M. on 4/14/26, (V1) was notified of an alleged physical altercation between (R10 and (R18) in the hallway near the nurse's station. Both residents were immediately separated. Facility leadership reviewed the medical record of the residents. Employees and residents that were knowledgeable of the allegation were interviewed by the Abuse Coordinator. (R18)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately reflect a resident's injection and insulin status related to the Minimum Data Set assessment for 1 (R21) of 24 residents in a sample of 38. Findings include:R21's admission Record indicates R21's diagnoses. Diabetes Mellitus is not listed as a diagnosis.R21's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents in section N0300. Injections R21 received 7 injections in a week. Section N0350. Insulin documents R21 received 7 insulin injections in a week. R21's Order Summary Report does not document a physician order for insulin injections. On 5/28/2026 at 9:30 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated V2 could not find documentation in R21's electronic health record confirming R21 has received insulin injections since admission to the facility or has any current or past orders for insulin injections.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor a resident's condition after return from the hospital for one resident (R2) of four residents reviewed for hospitalizations in a total sample of thirty eight. R2's Medical Record documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include acute and Chronic Respiratory failure with Hypoxia, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Congestive Heart Failure and Hypertension. R2's Progress Notes dated 11/25/2025 document 2 was being sent to the emergency room for abnormal Hemoglobin. R2's admission assessment dated [DATE] documents she returned from the hospital after hospitalization for low Hemoglobin that was treated with blood transfusions. R2's Medical Record does not contain any other follow up or mention of R2's condition after hospitalization. On 5/28/2026 V2 (Registered Nurse/Director of Nursing) confirmed there was no ongoing monitoring of R2 by nurses after her hospitalization. V2 stated, (R2) should have had assessments for three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to put a splint on as ordered for one resident (R6) of one resident reviewed for positioning/mobility in a total sample of thirty eight.R6's Medical Record documents she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include but not limited to Bipolar, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Encephalopathy. R6's Physical Therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE] documents, (R6) exhibits good improvements in right ankle range of motion. Correspondence with primary caregivers (facility staff) to facilitate development and follow-through of patient's plan and discussed equipment needs in preparation for next level of care. The facility's Training Acknowledgement training sign in sheet documents the topic as correct donning right AFO (Ankle Foot Orthosis). Put on Right AFO in the morning and remove before bed. for (R6). Throughout the survey R6 did not have a splint on her ankle. On 5/28/2026 R6 stated she wasn't sure if she was supposed to have a splint on any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure prompt communication between Hospice Services and the facility for one resident (R6) of three residents reviewed for Hospice Services in a total sample of thirty eight. The Facility's Hospice Services Agreement signed and dated 8/1/2023 documents Hospice personnel shall provide all necessary oversight of services provided to Residents in accordance with the Hospice Plan of Care. Hospice shall review documentation of such services and shall communicate weekly Facility personnel to ensure that the needs of Residents are met in a comprehensive, coordinated fashion twenty-four hours a day. Such communication shall be documented pursuant to Hospice Policy. R6's Medical Record documents she was admitted to the facility on Hospice Services on 12/10/2024. R6's diagnosis include but are not limited to Congestive Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation, and history of Myocardial Infarction. R6's Medical Record documents she cognitively impaired and has short term memory problems. On 5/27/2026 V17 (Certified Nurse Aide) stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain resident rooms in a clean and safe manner for four residents (R6, R8, R12, and R13) of four reviewed for safe, clean and homelike environment in a sample of 15.Findings Include:Facility's Maintenance Director Job Description dated 3/2024 documents: The primary purpose of the Maintenance Director is to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operation of the Maintenance Department in accordance with current, federal, state and local standards, guidelines, and regulations governing our facility, and as may be directed by the Administrator, to assure that our facility is maintained in a safe and comfortable manner.On 9/3/25 at 1:30 PM V1 stated he is unable to locate a policy for cleaning the air conditioner units in resident rooms.On 9/3/25 at 9:35 AM The AC (Air Conditioner) units in R6 and R13's room is located in the wall under the window. There are foam tubes around AC unit with a quarter sized hole where daylight can be seen. The vent slats of AC unit have multiple pinpoint black spots on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed obtain physician ordered weekly weights for one resident of three residents (R1) reviewed for weights in a sample of 15. Findings Include:The facility's Significant Weight Gain or Loss Policy dated 02/2025 documents, All residents will be weighed monthly unless physician order indicates differently.R1's physician's orders, dated 9/5/25, document weekly weights were ordered to begin for R1 on 6/23/25. R1 also has orders to receive the following medications for the diagnosis of congestive heart failure: Torsemide 20mg (milligrams) by mouth daily, Diltiazem 300mg by mouth daily, Metoprolol Succinate ER 50mg by mouth daily, and Aldactone 12.5mg by mouth.On 9/3/25 at 11:17 AM, R1 stated she has not been getting weighed because the machine used to weigh her has been broken.R1's Weight and Vitals Summary dated 9/3/25 documents from 6/23/25 to 8/17/25 weights were only obtained on the following dates: 6/23/25 (419.8 pounds), 7/1/25 (416 pounds), and 7/7/25 (415 pounds).On 9/3/25 at 9:38 AM, V1 (Administrator) verified the facility has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement new interventions after falls and failed to complete a thorough post fall assessment for three of three residents (R2, R4 and R5.) reviewed for falls in a sample of 15. Findings include: 1. R2's medical record documents that R2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include but not limited to unspecified dementia, moderate without behavioral disturbance, cerebral infarction and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. R2's documentation Un-witnessed fall dated 8/13/25 filled out by V2 (Director of Nursing) documents resident self-transferred from toilet resulting fall. Resident lying on left side of shower room floor. R2's documentation Un-witnessed fall dated 8/13/25 filled out by V2 (DON) documents under Mental status that resident was disoriented, but wnl (within normal limits) for this resident, oriented to person and oriented to situation were marked. The areas of resident did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent staff to resident verbal abuse for two of three residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for abuse in a sample of three. Findings include:The facility's 24-hour Abuse Investigation Report, dated 7/16/25, documents V1, Administrator, was informed V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant), alleged cussing and yelling at a resident (R3) during care. V4 was suspended immediately pending investigation.V10's, Certified Nursing Assistant, signed statement, dated 7/17/25, documents R3 put on her call light. V4 said, Why did you have me pull you the F K up in the bed? This form also documents V4 is rough towards residents.On 8/19/25 at 3:00pm, V10, Certified Nursing Assistant, stated V4 answered R3's call light and wanted to be pulled up. V10 stated he heard V4 say Why the F k do you want me to pull you up, when all you do is slide right back down? V4 stated he used several other curse words while he was in the room. V10 stated he told the nurse right away. On 8/19/25 at 12:30pm, V1, Administrator verified he did not consider V4 cussing at R3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's haircut was done safely for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of 5. The findings include: On 7/8/25 at 9:17 AM, R1 was seated in a wheelchair in his room. R1 had a full beard and partially bald head. R1 stated he received a hair and beard cut a couple of weeks ago and was all cut up during the process. R1 said a female staff member (name unknown) wheeled him into the beauty shop and just started in on me with hair clippers. R1 said the staff member took the guard piece off the clippers during the process and cut him under his chin. R1 said he hollered and yelled quit!. R1 said the staff member 'kept right on with what she was doing', and he felt like she didn't care. R1 said she moved to the back of his head with the clippers, and it was hurting him there too. On 7/8/25 at 9:39 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated R1 was given a haircut a few weeks ago by a CNA. V1 said when the facility beautician was out on medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide eight consecutive hours of a Registered Nurse, daily. This failure has the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Facility Assessment Tool, dated 7/1/2024, documents the facility will provide a Registered Nurse (RN) as required with CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) minimum staffing requirements (eight consecutive hours per day). The facility's nursing staff schedule for March 2025, documents on 3/23/25 the facility did not have eight hours of an RN staffed in the facility. The facility's daily staff posting documents on 3/23/25, the facility was staffed with Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) and documents no Registered Nurses provided resident care throughout 24 hours. On 3/25/25 at 1:45 PM, V1 (Administrator) confirmed the daily staff postings provided for March 2025 are accurate. On 3/26/25 at 11:16 AM, V13 (LPN/ Infection Control Preventionist) confirmed that she has been doing some nursing assistant schedules and Director of Nursing duties…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prepared refrigerated foods were labeled and dated with an expiration date, opened foods were stored in covered containers to prevent contamination, the kitchen floor/dry storage room floor were kept clean and free of debris, and kitchen surfaces were kept free from dust and debris. These failures have the potential to affect all 49 residents in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Food and Supplies: Storage Policy, dated 1/2024, documents, Policy: Food and supply storage areas shall be maintained in a clean, safe and sanitary manner. Procedures: 1. Food services will maintain clean food storage areas. 4. Prepared foods stored in the refrigerator until service will be covered, labeled, and dated with an expiration date. 6. All foods will be covered, labeled, and dated. If there is no expiration date on the package or container, a use-by date must be written on the product. The facility's Dry Storage Policy, dated 3/2025, documents, Dry storage areas will be kept neat, orderly, and in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-26 · tag F0887 — widespreadEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer Covid-19 vaccinations and vaccination education to all employees. This failure has the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Interim Covid-19 Vaccination Guidelines - Residents and Employees policy, dated 10/2024, documents, To minimize the risk of residents acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from Covid-19. The facility maintains documentation related to staff Covid-19 vaccination that includes at minimum the following: That staff were provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with Covid-19 vaccine; Staff were offered the Covid-19 vaccine or information on obtaining the Covid-19 vaccine. On 3/26/25 at 10:40 AM V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ Infection Control Preventionist) stated she doesn't have documentation to show Covid-19 vaccinations are offered to all employees or to show they are given education related to the Covid-19 vaccination. V13 stated, Staff are told to go to the local pharmacy to get the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-26 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) were provided and completed Dementia training in a 12 month period. This failure has the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Facility Assessment tool, dated 7/1/24, documents the facility cares for residents with Cognitive loss/ Dementia. This policy also documents, Required in-service training for nurse aides. In-service training must: Be sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides but must be no less than 12 hours per year. Include dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training. On 3/25/25 at 11:45 AM, V1 (Administrator) provided a 12 month yearly training report for V18, V19 and V20 (Certified Nursing Assistants, CNA). These reports do not include documentation that V18, V19 or V20 have completed Dementia training from March 2024- March 2025. On 3/25/25 at 1:45 PM, V1 confirmed several residents in the facility have a diagnosis of Dementia and he does not have documentation to show…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to date oxygen tubing and bag when not in use, place an oxygen sign on resident doors, and ensure a nebulizer facemask and tubing was changed weekly for four of five residents (R2, R6, R7, R11) reviewed for respiratory care in a sample of 36. Findings include: The facility's Oxygen and Respiratory Equipment-Changing/Cleaning Policy, dated 10/2024 documents Purpose: 1. To provide guidelines to employees for changing all disposable respiratory supplies. 2. To ensure the safety of residents by providing maintenance of all disposable respiratory supplies. 3. To minimize the risk of infection transmission. Procedure: 1. Handheld Nebulizer and Mask, if applicable: a. The handheld nebulizer should be changed weekly and as needed. b. A clean plastic bag with a zip lock or draw string, etc. (etcetera). should be changed weekly and as needed. 2. Nasal Cannula. a. Nasal cannulas are to be changed once a week and as needed. b. Whenever possible, residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions were implemented for five of five residents (R2, R10, R17, R47, and R51) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 36. The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy, dated 3/2024, documents, Statement of Purpose: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP): recommendations now include use of EBP for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices during high-contact resident care activities regardless of their multidrug-resistant organism status. Personnel: Personnel providing direct care. Personal Protective Equipment: Gown and gloves. Policy: EBP may be considered and implemented for: Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (central line, feeding tube, tracheostomy, drains etc. (Etcetera). Infection or colonization with a novel or targeted multi-drug resistant organism when contact isolation does not apply. At discretion of the Infection Preventionist. Personal Protective Equipment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with new diagnoses of mental illness after admission was referred to the state agency for a level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation for one of two residents (R7) reviewed for PASARR screening in the sample of 36. Findings include: The facility's Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR) Policy, dated 3/2024, documents, It is the policy to screen all potential admissions on an individualized basis. As part of the preadmission process, the facility participates in PASARR level I for all new and readmissions per requirements to determine if the individual meets the criterion for mental disorder (Severe Mental Illness/Severe Mental Disability), intellectual disability or related condition. Annually and with any significant change of status, the facility will complete the PASARR level one screen for those individuals identified per the Level II screen requiring specialized services. R7's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow a Physician's Wound Order for one of two residents (R47) reviewed for wound care in a sample of 36. Findings Include: The Facility's Pressure Injury and Skin Condition Assessment Policy, dated/revised 01/2018, documents, Physician ordered treatments shall be initialed by the staff on the electronic Treatment Administration Record after each administration. Other nursing measures not involving medications shall be documented in the weekly wound assessment or nurses noted. R47's Physician Order Sheet, dated 3/19/2025, documents Non-Pressure Wound of the Right Second toe. Dressing Treatment Plan, Primary Dressing: Betadine apply once daily for 23 days. Secondary Dressing: Gauze Island with border apply once daily for 23 days. On 3/25/2025 at 11:06 AM, V11 (RN/Registered Nurse) entered R47's room. V11 removed R47's right foot sock. A pea sized black, dry, and crusted area was noted to R47's right 2nd toe knuckle. V11 used 4x4 gauze saturated with normal saline and cleansed R47's wound. V11 then opened a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to care for dependent residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Facility Assessment Tool dated 08/2024-07/2025, documents, Indicate the number of residents you are licensed to provide care for: 65. Average Daily Census Analysis states the average residents are 60, the minimum is 55, and the maximum is 64. This same document states that staffing units per shift should have one Registered Nurse (RN), one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), and six Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) for days. Evenings, one RN, one LPN, and six CNA's. Nights, one LPN, and five CNA's. The facility's Resident List Report, dated 1/13/25, documents that 60 residents reside in the facility. The facility's Daily Staffing Sheet, dated 1/13/25, documents that for 1st shift the facility staffed one RN and one LPN and five CNAs. The same sheet documents that for 2nd shift the facility staffed two LPN's and five CNAs. On 1/13/25 at 9 A.M., V4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative services were being provided for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for restoratives and range of motion in a total sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Restorative Nursing Program policy revised on 01/2019 documents, Purpose: to promote each residents ability to maintain or regain the highest degree of independence as safely as possible. Includes, but is not limited to, programs in walking/mobility, dressing and grooming, eating and swallowing, transferring, bed mobility, communication, splint or brace assistance, amputation care and continence programs. Guidelines: Documentation of the interventions and the resident's response will be completed with each implementation. 1. R1's Restorative: Active ROM (Range of Motion) done every shift dated 1/13/25 look back on the last 14 days show the following dates documented as not done. 12/31/24-1/13/25 only done on two shifts instead of three. R1's Restorative: Dressing/grooming done every shift dated 1/13/25 look back on the last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-08 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post the facility Daily Staffing Report daily and, in an area, visible to all residents and visitors. This failure has the potential to affect all 58 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Midnight Census report, dated 11/6/24, documents there are currently 58 residents residing in the facility. On 11/6/24 at 8:35 am, the facility's Nurse Staffing posting was located near the Receptionist desk, on the wall, behind a portable stand that held instructions for visitors to sign in on the facility's visitor log. This posting is not easily visible to staff, residents, or visitors. This Nurse Staffing posting was last completed on 10/29/24. On 11/8/24 at 10:20 am, 10:22 am, 10:24 am, and 10:25 am, R2, R9, R10, and R12 respectively stated they do not know where the Nursing Staff posting is located. On 11/6/24 at 9:12 am, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) walked with this writer to the Receptionist desk and confirmed the location of the Nurse Staffing posting on the wall behind a portable stand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-08 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately report the PBJ (pay-roll based journal) staffing information. This failure affects all 58 residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's PBJ (pay-roll based journal) Staffing Data Report, fiscal year Quarter 3 2024, dated April 1 through June 30, 2024, documents Excessively Low Weekend Staffing was triggered due to facility submission of excessively low staffing worked on the weekends. The facility's Midnight Census report, dated 11/6/24, documents there are currently 58 residents residing in the facility. On 11/6/24 and 11/7/24 at 7:30 am through 4:00 pm, there were six CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants), two RNs (Registered Nurses) and one LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) working on the day shift. On 11/6/24 at 11:05 am and 11:21 am, and on 11/7/24 at 7:45 am and 9:40 am R2, R10, R6 and R9 respectively stated the facility has two to three CNAs and a Nurse for each hallway in the facility and their needs are being met. On 11/8/24 at 8:30 am, R12 stated she is the President of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from misappropriation of resident property for nine residents (R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14 and R15) of nine residents reviewed for missing medications, in a sample of 15. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility policy, Abuse Prevention and Reporting, dated (reviewed) 08/2023 directs staff, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. Misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation or wrongful temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. The facility Preliminary 24-Hour Abuse Investigation Report dated 8/30/24 documents, We (facility) have received all allegation (of) Theft. On 8/29/24 (the facility) made aware of alleged misappropriation of resident property. Investigation initiated. Staff member identified (V6/RN) and suspended pending investigation. Follow up report will be sent.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep medications secure for nine residents (R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14 and R15) of nine residents reviewed for medication storage, in a sample of 15. The facility policy, Narcotic/Controlled Substances- Counting, dated (reviewed) 11/2023 directs staff, To count controlled substances with a partner and to verify the accuracy of the log sheets. General Guidelines: Always participate in the counting of the controlled substances at the beginning and ending of your shift. If you do not observe the medication that you sign as being present, you may be implicated if the medications are later missing. Follow your facilities specific guidelines and use their specific log sheet. The facility form, Shift Change Controlled Substance Inventory Count Sheet directs staff, Nurse coming on to shift must verify count of all controlled substances with nurse coming off shift or any time the medication cart keys are exchanged. Nurses must count total (number) of cards/containers and total (number) count sheets, both for individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a staff member treated a resident with respect for one of six residents (R1) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of five. Findings include: The facility's Resident Rights policy dated 02/2024 documents, Purpose: To promote the exercise of rights for each resident, including any who face barriers in the exercise of these rights. Exercising rights means that residents have autonomy and choice, to the maximum extent possible, about how they wish to live their everyday lives and receive care, subject to the facility's rules, as long as those rules do not violate a regulatory requirement. The facility's Concern/Compliment Form dated 7-1-24 documents, Nature of complaint: (R1) concerned that night shift CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant (V28) was acting weird. Correction action taken: Education to employee (V28) on resident rights and customer service. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents R1 is cognitively intact. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1) implement an antibiotic stewardship program that included assessing and monitoring residents for signs and symptoms of infections; 2) ensure antibiotic usage was appropriate, and 3) use of a nationally recognized surveillance criteria to define infections for 3 of 3 (R34, R57, R58) residents reviewed for the Antibiotic Stewardship Program in the sample of 37. Findings include: The Antibiotic/Antimicrobial Stewardship Program-Mission Statement & Guidelines dated 11/2017 documented, The Consultant Pharmacist will review the use of antibiotics by performing medication regimen review, reviewing the clinical record and laboratory results, and making recommendations regarding antibiotic use. Tracking and Monitoring Review the clinical record for new antibiotic starts to determine whether the clinical assessment, prescription documentation and antibiotic selection were in accordance with the antibiotic stewardship practices. When conducted over time, monitoring process monitors can assess whether antibiotic prescribing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet the needs of the residents for four residents (R1, R2, R4, and R5) out of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living and call lights in a sample of five. Findings include: The facility's Bathing - Shower and Tub Bath policy dated 8/2023 documents, A shower, tub bath or bed/sponge bath will be offered according to resident's preference, no less than once per week or according to the resident's preferred frequency and as needed or requested. The facility's Call Light policy dated 7/2023 documents Purpose: To respond to resident's requests and needs in a timely and courteous manner. Guidelines: 1. Answer light (signal) promptly. 3. Turn off call light. 5. Respond to request, if item is not available, or request questionable, get assistance from charge nurse. Return to resident with prompt reply. 6. Offer further assistance before leaving resident's room. The facility's Facility Assessment dated 8/2020 through 7/2024 documents the following direct care staffing numbers: Six CNAs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-03-26 · tag F0847 — widespreadInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to explain the arbitration agreement to the resident, or their representative in a form or manner they could understand. This had the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 3/26/25 at 1:22 PM, V1/Administrator stated that there is not an Arbitration Agreement policy. The Arbitration Agreement (not dated) documents, Binding Arbitration is private, less costly, and less time-consuming than traditional litigation. The parties agree to submit their dispute to an impartial arbitrator authorized to resolve the controversy(s) by rendering a final and binding decision(s). Which can be enforced by the court. On 3/23/25 at 11:44 AM V3/Social Service Director stated, I have done the admissions since around September of 2024. The resident and Residents Power of Attorney are shown a video and given the contract where they can sign or not sign. I tell them if there are any concerns we encourage them to use arbitration instead of a lawyer. No one has declined to sign the arbitration. V3 was asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,994 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,994 — penalty dated 2024-07-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ARCADIA CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAVID A BERKOWITZ DELTA TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| JOSHUA HOFFMAN TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2023 |
| YOSEF MEYSTEL DELTA TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| GOLDFARB, BRIAN | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/01/2023 |
| SEITLER, DOVID | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| BROOKS, KENDEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| NEWELL, KAYLA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| ARCADIA CARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| INGALSBE, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| MCCLURE, MICHELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| MILLER, JEREMY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| BERKOWITZ, DAVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/13/2025 |
| MEYSTEL, YOSEF | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/13/2025 |
| 555 E CLAY ST, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/03/2025 |
| APERION CARE EXEC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| DAVID A BERKOWITZ REVOC TR DAVID BERKOWITZ TTEE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
| YOSEF MEYSTEL DECLARATION OF TR OF YOSEF MEYSTEL TTEE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $404K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145319. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.