Arc At Bradley

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 88.9 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.74 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.82 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly transfer a resident from his bed to the wheelchair. This failure resulted in the resident sustaining an impacted spiral fracture of the left humerus. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for injuries in a sample of 3.Findings include:R2 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease, chronic atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and a history of traumatic brain injury. On 5/15/26, R2 was admitted to the hospital for an impacted spiral fracture of the left humerus and discharged on 5/18/26. On 5/27/26 at 11:35 am, R2 left shoulder and upper arm were observed swollen with purple coloring to the skin.On 5/27/26 at 11:50 am, V7 (R2's family member) said that on 5/15/26, she came to visit R2, and when she touched his left shoulder, he jumped and told her that his shoulder hurt. V7 said she reported it to R2's nurse.On 5/27/26 at 2:35 pm, V5 (Nurse) said she was R2's nurse on 5/15/26 and V7…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise a resident's smoking activity and failed to implement interventions to prevent her from sustaining burn injuries. This failure resulted in a resident sustaining blistered (second degree) cigarette burns.This applies to 1 of 4 (R1) residents reviewed for smoking safety in a sample of 5.The findings include:The facility's Reportable Incident form showed that on 4/6/26 at 11:40 AM, R1 was observed with a wound to left side of chest. [R1] was outside on a smoke break and was wearing the smoker's apron. Resident was observed with what appeared to be a cigarette burn on the left side of her chest. Root cause determined to be burn caused by cigarette ash due to windy conditions, smoker's apron flew up while smoking during smoke break.On 04/29/2026 at 1:31 PM, the resident smoking activity was observed. Staff placed a smoking ring (device that holds a cigarette) on R1's left index finger. R1's smoking apron was placed in a manner that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transfer a dependent resident safely by failing to use a mechanical lift with two staff assistance for one of four residents (R1) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining an acute nondisplaced proximal tib (tibia)-fib (fibula) fracture. Findings include: The facility's 2/24/2025 Report to the State Survey Agency showed R1 .was observed on his right side Stat Xray done .Upon investigation that included review of clinical records, assessment, hospital documentation, and statements of staff on duty; it was found that resident is a 2 transfer assist This serves as final report. On 03/02/25 at 9:42 AM, R1 stated her fall occurred when the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was trying to put her in the shower chair. R1 stated there was only one CNA assisting her to transfer. R1 stated she fell, and her left leg was hurting. R1 stated the CNA told her Your leg is fine. R1 stated her left leg is broken in two places. On 03/02/25 at 1:33…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer prevention interventions including completing and documenting physician ordered weekly skin assessments and failed to identify and treat a facility-acquired pressure ulcer for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for skin concerns on a sample list of eight. These failures caused R1 to develop a sacral pressure ulcer that was discovered and noted to be unstageable, upon assessment by a wound physician. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet showed his diagnoses included type 2 diabetes, adult failure to thrive, hypertension, blindness in one eye unspecified, left side hemiplegia and hemiparesis, chronic kidney disease, and acquired absence of left leg below the knee. R1's 1/5/2025 MDS (Minimum Data Set) showed he was cognitively intact and he did not have a behavior of rejecting care. R1 was identified as being at risk for developing pressure ulcer / injury. R1 utilized a manual wheelchair for mobility and was occasionally incontinent of urine and stool. R1 did not have any documented MASD (Moisture…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility neglected to monitor a resident's change in condition, follow the orders to monitor a resident's vital signs and blood pressure as ordered and failed to notify the advanced practice nurse of signs and symptoms of a stroke. This failure resulted in a delay of treatment for R1 and causing a hemorrhagic stroke and right-sided weakness. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for facility response to change in condition and treatment in a sample of 3. The findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] having a mild cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. On 11/07/23 at 10:15 AM, V8 (Hospital Registered Nurse) stated, On 10/31/23, R1 said to multiple staff at multiple times to send him to ER (Emergency Room) as he was experiencing right side numbness and tingling. But they don't let him for whatever reason. R1 said he began to tell people to send him to the hospital on [DATE] at around 9-10 AM. He was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received timely incontinence care.This failure applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for incontinence care.Findings include:R1's health record shows he is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses including dystonia (neurological movement disorder), type 1 diabetes, hydrocephalus (brain fluid disorder), muscle wasting and atrophy, and cognitive communication deficit who was admitted to the facility April 17, 2026.On June 08, 2026 at 1:13 PM, V9 (Friend) said approximately 3 weeks ago, R1 was in the dining room during dinner. V9 said R1 had wet through his pants, his chair cushion, and the urine had leaked onto the floor. R1 was wearing double incontinence briefs and leaked through it all. A team leader was called to dining room to see and clean up the urine. V9 said approximately a week or week and a half ago, R1 triggered his call light to be changed, a staff responded by coming into the room, turning the call light off,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain residents' rooms and bathroom areas in a safe, clean and homelike condition. This failure applies to 5 of 7 residents (R1, R3, R4, R5, and R6) reviewed for environment.Findings include:1. R5 was a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses that included a history of brain aneurysm, recurrent major depressive disorder, and presence of vascular implants and grafts who was admitted to the facility March 29, 2022. On May 13, 2026 at 9:35 AM, in R5's bathroom, there was a heavy presence of rust on the ceiling vent and shower tile, a heavy presence of a thick dark substance and stains throughout the floor, cracked and peeling ceiling paint, a loose handle bar, visible rust stains on another handle bar, and on the frame of a toilet commode. R5 said he would like the maintenance issues addressed when maintenance is available to get to it, there is only one maintenance staff. 2. R1 is a [AGE] year-old female with a diagnoses history of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide bathing assistance to residents dependent for assistance. This applies to 2 of 4 (R2, R3) residents reviewed for bathing in a sample of 4 residents. Findings include: On 6/17/25 at 11:25 AM, R3 stated she had missed getting showers. R3 stated she was supposed to be switched to evening shift for baths. Last week no one could tell her who the shower aid was. R3 stated was then told she was not on the list for her Tuesday showers. During the interview R3 was noted with an unpleasant odor. On 6/17/25 at 11:36 AM, R2 stated she had not gotten her bed bath on Wednesday the prior week. R2 stated she prefers bed baths to showers. R2 stated there is a regular occurrence that she misses her bed bath. She brought the issue up in the last resident council meeting and had spoken to the social worker about her missed bed baths. R2 stated she never refuses a bed baths because she only gets them twice per week and she wants them done. During the interview R2 was noted with an unpleasant body odor. On 6/17/25 at 11:47…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was able to get into bed to use his urinal. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R3) reviewed for incontinence care. Findings include: On 03/04/25 at 1:20 PM, R3 stated on Friday 02/28/25 he had been sitting up in his wheelchair since 11:00 AM. R3 stated at 2:30 PM he was still in the wheelchair in his room. He stated his bed was not working. R3 stated the staff knew his bed was not working before he got out of bed. He stated the staff told him a work order was in place to repair his bed. R3 stated at 2:30 PM he pressed his call light to let his CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) know that he needed to urinate. His bed still was not working. He stated maintenance came in and tried to repair the bed, but it still did not work. R3 stated the facility called the other maintenance person who was at home. R3 stated he still needed to urinate. R3 stated he was wearing and incontinence brief, but he urinates a lot. R3 stated he wanted to use the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide call light access. This applies to 2 of 7 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for call light accessibility in a sample of 8. Findings include: 1.R2 has diagnoses that includes quadriplegia, type 2 diabetes and epilepsy. R2's current care plan interventions include ensure call light is within reach and answer promptly. On 2/19/25 at 4:02 PM, R2 was sitting up in his motorized wheelchair. R2's call light that is activated when he blows into it was located on the left side of his bed near the wall and not in reach of his mouth. R2 stated the call light is never left near him when he is up in his wheelchair. R2 stated he must go out in the hall and look for assistance if he needs anything. On 2/20/25 at 1:17 PM, V7 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated all residents should have a call light available to them to notify staff if they need assistance. 2. R3 has diagnoses that includes hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, carcinoma in situ of anus and anal canal, hypertension and dysphagia. R3's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide shower assistance to a resident. This applies to 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for shower assistance in the sample of 11. Findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's admission MDS (minimum data set) dated January 30, 2025 showed that the resident was cognitively intact and required total assistance from the staff with shower. The facility's care plan task report showed that R1 was scheduled to receive shower/bathing on Tuesdays and Fridays during the morning. The facility presented only one shower sheet dated January 27, 2025 signed by V10 (CNA/certified Nursing Assistant). On February 4, 2025 at 3:30 PM, V10 stated that she did not provide a shower to R1 on January 27, 2025 but instead provided a bed bath. On February 4, 2025 at 12:22 PM, R1 was in bed, alert and oriented. In the presence of V2 (Director of Nursing), R1 stated that she had not received any shower since admission at the facility. During this…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide routine shower/bed bath care for residents who require extensive assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) care. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for ADL care in the sample of 3. The findings include: 1. Face sheet shows R1 has multiple medical diagnoses which include acute and chronic respiratory failure, unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia, chronic kidney disease, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, morbid (severe) obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, encounter for attention for tracheostomy, atelectasis, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, other asthma, need for assistance with personal care, other lack of coordination, other reduced mobility, abnormal posture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], shows R1 is alert and oriented and requires substantial/maximal assistance for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience to residents who require feeding assistance. The facility also failed to provide dignity in wound care by not closing windows during wound care. This applies to 5 of 8 residents (R5, R17, R18, R22, and R24) reviewed for dignified resident care in a sample of 25. The Findings include: 1. R299 is a [AGE] year-old female with severe cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. The MDS also documents that R299 requires partial/moderate assistance with eating. 2. R18 is a [AGE] year-old male with cognition intact as per the MDS dated [DATE] and requiring substantial/maximal assistance for eating. 3. R22 is a [AGE] year-old male with severely impaired cognition as per the MDS dated [DATE] and with an admitting diagnosis, including hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side secondary to cerebral infarction. 4. R24 is a [AGE] year-old female with severely impaired cognition as per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide activities for 4 residents (R17, R29, R50 & R44) based on their care plans in a sample of 25. 1. on [DATE] at 11:44 AM, R17 was observed in her room. V15 (R17's son) was present at the time. V15 said that the facility does not provide activities for his mother. V15 said Someone used to come around and spend time with her, but she died. Now no one comes by. V15 said that he is at the facility everyday A review of R17's electronic health records showed no 1:1 activity for the last 30 days. R17's [DATE] care plan showed activities care need with interventions including, express satisfaction with level and type of involvement in leisure activities during one on one visits 3-4xweekly. 2. During tours of the facility on [DATE], [DATE] & [DATE], R29 was never observed in any 1:1 activity. A review of R29's last 30 days of 1:1 activity program showed, No documentation. R29's [DATE] Care plan showed a care need for activities with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify environmental hazards that poses risks for potential accidents. This applies to 6 of 6 residents (R6, R8, R28, R33, R39, and R61) reviewed for accidents/hazards in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. On 05/14/24 at 12:20 PM R39 was not in the room. A portable oxygen tank (cylinder) was stored in R39's closet without a cart or stand. On 05/15/24 at 3:11 PM the portable oxygen tank (cylinder) was still in the closet without a storage cart or stand. On 05/16/24 at 10:44 AM the portable oxygen tank continued to be stored in R39's closet without a storage cart or stand. On 05/14/24 at 2:55 PM R39 said he does not use oxygen and does not know why the oxygen is stored in his closet. On 05/16/24 at 11:51 AM V5 (Assistant Director of Nursing) said the portable oxygen (cylinder) tanks are stored in the front oxygen room. The portable oxygen is stored in a crate that is individualized for each tank. No oxygen should be stored in a closet without being secured. V5 said secured means that the oxygen is in a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$123,187 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $98,565 — penalty dated 2026-02-19
• $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-02-21
• $14,264 — penalty dated 2023-11-08
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-19 for 90 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARCADIA CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL