Brickyard Healthcare - Bloomington Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 30.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 153 beds and averages 121.8 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.13 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  A. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent a cognitively impaired resident with a history of exit seeking behavior from leaving the facility property without staff knowledge for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident B)B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the secured unit courtyard gate was locked for 2 of 3 observations. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on, 5/8/26 at approximately 9:30 a.m. when the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent a cognitively impaired resident with a history of exit seeking behavior from leaving the facility property for an unknown amount of time without staff knowledge. The Administrator, the Director of Nursing, the Regional Nurse were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 5/13/23 at 3:45 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 5/14/26 at 1:30 p.m., but noncompliance remained at a lower scope and severity level of isolated, no actual harm with potential for more than minimal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent a cognitively impaired resident, who had an appointed guardian and history of exit seeking, from exiting the facility without staff knowledge for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopements. This deficient practice resulted in the resident being located by local law enforcement 1.8 miles away. (Resident B) This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on, 3/29/25 at approximately 9:45 p.m., when the facility failed to prevent a cognitively impaired resident from leaving the facility without staff knowledge. The Area [NAME] President and Regional Nurse were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 4/2/25 at 12:20 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice corrected, on 3/30/25, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Finding includes: During an interview on 4/2/25 at 8:06 a.m., LPN 1 indicated she arrived at work on 3/29/25 at approximately 10:50 p.m. Resident B had already left the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical restraints for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for restraints. A restraint was applied by unlicensed personnel, there was no physician's order, consent, or documentation for release of the restraint. (Resident B, CNA 3)Finding includes:On 7/14/25 at 12:00 p.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia affecting right dominant side (paralysis or severe weakness on the right side of the body), dementia, and aphasia (a language disorder that affects the ability to communicate).A progress note, dated 6/26/25 at 5:59 p.m., indicated an incident was reported by CNA 1 that when she came on shift, Resident B was noted to have a sock tied around his left hand. The CNA reported the observation to a licensed nurse. A head-to-toe assessment was completed by the licensed nurse, the resident was noted to have swelling of his left hand and red linear indentation (indentation that is long and narrow) on his left wrist.A Care Plan,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment free of damage, disrepair, and odor of urine for 1 of 2 secured units and 5 of 7 resident rooms reviewed for environment. (Reflections 2 Unit, room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER]) Findings include: 1. On 4/23/25 at 1:20 p.m., 4/24/25 at 2:10 p.m., and 4/25/25 at 10:40 a.m., the bathroom off the dining room on the Reflections 2 unit was observed to emit a strong odor of urine and had brown stained substance around the base of the toilet. 2. On 4/25/25 at 10:45 a.m., the 2 shower room stalls in the Reflections 2 unit shower room were observed to have a brown stained substance around the junctions where the walls meet the floors. 3. On 4/25/25 at 10:50 a.m., the base of the bathroom door in the Lounge room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have broken wall board. 4. On 4/25/25 at 10:55 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have damaged drywall a the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the written notification required for a transfer and discharge was provided to the resident and the resident representative for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 53) Findings include: Resident 53's clinical record was reviewed on 4/23/25 at 2:15 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure and kidney failure. Resident 53's progress notes indicated the resident was sent to the hospital on 1/9/25 and 3/11/25. The clinical record lacked documentation of written notification of the transfer and discharge forms having been provided to the resident and the resident representative. During an interview on 4/24/25 at 12:11 p.m., the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) indicated the facility did not have documentation which indicated the transfer and discharge forms were provided in writing to Resident 53 and the resident's representative. On 4/25/25 at 12:06 p.m., the DNS provided the facility's policy,Transfer and Discharge undated, and indicated it was the policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the notification of the bed-hold policy required for a resident who transferred to the hospital was provided in writing to the resident or the resident representative for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 53) Findings include: Resident 53's clinical record was reviewed on 4/23/25 at 2:15 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure and kidney failure. Resident 53's progress notes indicated the resident was sent to the hospital on 1/9/25 and 3/11/25. The clinical record lacked documentation of written notification which specified the facility's bed-hold policy was provided to the resident or the resident representative. During an interview on 4/24/25 at 12:11 p.m., the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) indicated the facility did not have documentation which indicated the bed-hold forms were provided in writing to Resident 53 or the resident's representative. On 4/25/25 at 1:07 p.m., the Administrator provided the facility's policy,Bed Hold Notice undated, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan fall interventions were in place for a resident who was at risk for falls for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 107) Findings include: On 4/21/25 at 11:37 a.m., Resident 107 was observed to be resting in his bed. The bed was against the wall with no mat observed to be beside his bed. On 4/22/25 at 10:32 a.m., Resident 107 was observed to be resting in his bed. The bed was against the wall with no mat observed to be beside his bed. On 4/23/25 at 2:04 p.m., Resident 107 was observed to be resting in his bed. The bed was against the wall with no mat observed to be beside his bed. On 4/24/25 at 11:20 a.m., Resident 107's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, traumatic brain injury, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, anxiety, glaucoma, and dementia. The quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 3/31/25, indicated Resident 107 had moderate cognitive impairment and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care per the plan of care for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Insulin was not held per physician's orders. (Resident 107) Findings include: On 4/24/25 at 11:20 a.m., Resident 107's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, traumatic brain injury, and dementia. The April 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated to inject Humalog (insulin) 3 units subcutaneoulsy (under the skin) before meals. Hold if the blood sugar is less than 150 mg/dl (milligrams per deciliter), ordered 3/21/25. The MAR indicated the following: - On 4/5/25 before breakfast, the Humalog 3 units were administered. The blood sugar was 128 which was less than 150. The clinical record lacked documentation the insulin was held. - On 4/5/25 before lunch, the Humalog 3 units were administered. The blood sugar was 121 which was less than 150. The clinical record lacked documentation the insulin was held. - On 4/5/25 before dinner, the Humalog 3 units were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed practical nurse observed medication administration for a resident who did not self administer medications for 1 of 1 resident observed during a random observation. (Resident B) Findings include: During an interview with Resident B on 1/27/25 at 9:40 a.m., a medication cup with eight different medications was observed on the bedside table. The medication cup contained a mixture of tablets and capsules. Resident B indicated there had been ten different medications in the cup however, he had taken two already. Resident B indicated staff did not typically observe him when taking medications. During an interview with LPN 1 on 1/27/25 at 9:42 a.m., LPN 1 indicated she had observed Resident B take all his medications that morning and was unsure where the medications in the cup had come from. During an interview with LPN 1 on 1/27/25 at 11:35 a.m., LPN 1 indicated Resident B's morning medications included eleven different medications. He was currently out of one of his medications therefore, she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff accurately documented wound care treatments for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for documentation. (Resident C) Findings include: Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 1/27/25 at 2:05 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pressure ulcer and osteorarthritis of the knee. Current physician orders, dated 1/27/25, indicated Resident C's treatments included, but were not limited to: Left lateral foot: cleanse with wound cleaners, apply collagen to wound bed and cover with bordered gauze dressing once daily and prn (as needed). Left lateral lower leg: cleanse with wound cleanser, apply collagen to wound bed and cover with bordered gauze dressing once daily and prn. Right medial ankle: cleanse with wound cleanser, apply xeroform cover with bordered gauze, change daily. The clinical record lacked documentation which indicated the above treatments had been completed on 1/3/25, 1/6/25, 1/15/25, 1/17/25, 1/21/25, 1/24/25 and 1/25/25, nor had the resident refused the treatments on those dates. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a staff member for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (LPN 1, Resident C) Findings include: On 10/17/24 at 12:07 p.m., Resident C's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, discitis (inflammation that develops between the intervertebral discs of the spine). Physician orders, dated 9/29/24, indicated Resident C's medications included, but were not limited to meropenem (an antibiotic) intravenous (IV) solution reconstituted 1 gm (gram) intravenously every 8 hours for discitis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/15/24, indicated Resident C had no cognitive impairment. During a phone interview on 10/17/24 at 2:36 p.m., Resident C indicated he had a PICC line (a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart) inserted and received an IV medication each evening which took about 30 minutes to infuse. He had had trouble with LPN 1 in the past…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a self medication administration assessment was complete for residents with medications left at bedside for 1 of 1 random observations. (Resident 80) Findings include: On at 6/19/24 at 9:50 a.m., Resident 80 was observed in her room lying in bed next to the bedside table. On the bedside table in a plastic medication cup were 2 tablets of medication identified as 800 mg (milligrams) each of Sevelamer HCL (a medication used for persons on dialysis to lower blood phosphate levels). No facility staff members were present in the room at that time. Resident 80 indicated she took the medication with food, but she did not eat that morning, and the nurse left the medication on her bedside table and left the room. During an interview on 6/19/24 at 9:55 a.m., the Director of Nursing indicated the medication should not have been left with the resident, as medication administration was to be observed by the administering qualified staff unless the resident was assessed to be able to self administer medications. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,249 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,249 — penalty dated 2025-04-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $732K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN