No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brickyard Healthcare - Elkhart Care Center

1001 W Hively Ave, Elkhart, IN 46517 · For profit - Corporation · 175 certified beds · (574) 294-7641 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (574) 294-7641 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2025Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0570)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
600 East Blvd · (574) 523-3264 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2600 Oakland Ave Ste 511 · (574) 970-0440 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2711 Benham Ave · (574) 338-1958 · Call to confirm hours
Park
201 W Wolf Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
11th Street

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.2%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.4%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.4%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.9%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.2%23.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.9%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.5%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine44.4%79.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.8%22.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.0%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.131.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.211.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.3%CMS range 32.2–57.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.9–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 3.8–14.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.25
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.36
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
33.3%
Total nursing turnover
36.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 175 beds and averages 117.4 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-12)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hot coffee was served at a safe temperature for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in a resident sustaining skin burns when coffee was spilled on her lap, (Resident B). This deficient practice had the potential to affect 112 of 112 residents who could choose to receive daily hot coffee from the facility kitchen.Findings include:On 4/29/26 at 9:56 A.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to metabolic encephalopathy and vascular dementia.Resident B's most recent comprehensive annual Minimum Data Set, (MDS) Assessment, completed on 3/17/26, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required supervision for eating.A review of the resident's Nursing Progress Notes included the following: On 3/19/26 at 5:30 P.M., a Certified Nursing Assistant brought Resident B back from the dining room and indicated the resident had spilt coffee in her lap. The resident was noted to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an unusual occurrence was reported to the State Agency, when 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents was burned by hot coffee when the resident spilled the coffee in her lap, (Resident B).Findings include:On 4/29/26 at 9:56 A.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy and vascular dementia.Resident B's most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set, (MDS) Assessment, an annual assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required supervision for eating.A review of the resident's Nursing Progress Notes included the following: On 3/19/26 at 5:30 P.M., a Certified Nursing Assistant brought Resident B back from the dining room and indicated the resident had spilt coffee in her lap. The resident was noted to have redness with fluid filled blisters to the groin and bilat thigh area and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a personal representative at the request of the resident of new orders and a change of condition for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for notification of changes. (Resident B)Finding includes:A record review for Resident B was completed on 1/12/2026 at 9:30 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage 3, diabetes mellitus type 2 and acute metabolic acidosis.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/6/2025, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact. The 11/7/2025 3:28 P.M. Resident preferences evaluation indicated it was very important for the Resident to have their family or a close friend involved in their care.A Social Services note, dated 11/11/2025 at 4:39 P.M. indicated the resident had stated she wanted her granddaughter to be her emergency contact. Although the admission MDS assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact, nursing progress notes on the following dates and times indicated the resident was exhibiting confusion and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders regarding blood pressure medications were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident B)Finding includes:A record review for Resident B was completed on 1/12/2026 at 9:30 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage 3, diabetes mellitus type 2 and acute metabolic acidosis.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/6/2025, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact.A Physician's order, dated 11/5/2025, indicated the resident was to receive metoprolol 25 milligrams twice daily for hypertension. The order indicated the medication was to be held for a systolic blood pressure reading of less than 110 mm/Hg (millimeters of Mercury) or a pulse less than 60 beats per minute.A Medication Administration Record (MAR), for the month of November 2025 indicated the metoprolol medication had been administered on 11/22/2025 even though the resident's blood pressure was 102/42 mm/Hg.A MAR for the month of December…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. (Resident B).Finding includes:On 10/1/25 at 12:16 P.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included but were not limited to multiple sclerosis, mild cognitive impairment, depression, epilepsy, anxiety, and mood disorder. Review of the resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] for a Quarterly Assessment, indicated the resident was mildly cognitively impaired, had demonstrated verbal behaviors directed at others and had other behaviors not directed at others for 1 to 3 days of the assessment 7 day look back period. In addition, the assessment indicated Resident B utilized a motorized wheelchair independently for locomotion and was dependent on others for transferring, toileting, and bathing.A Nursing Progress Note, dated 7/4/25 at 9:00 A.M., indicated CNA 5 had answered Resident B's call light and was then was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to dispose of expired foods in a timely manner within the main kitchen's walk-in cooler. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 112 of 114 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.Finding includes:During an initial tour of the kitchen, on 8/4/2025 at 9:44 A.M., the following was observed in the walk-in cooler:-A container of corn dated 7/29/2025 with a use by of 7/31/2025-A container of chicken dated 7/3/2025-7 individualized cartons of yogurt in a cardboard box with use by date of 8/1/2025 -A serving bin with ice had 2 outdated yogurts -6 one-half gallon jugs of lime juice with a use by date of 7/14/2025 During an observation and interview on 8/4/2025 at 9:54 A.M. with the Regional Certified Dietary Manager of the walk- in cooler, she indicated the foods should have been disposed within the expiration dates. A policy was provided, on 8/4/2025 at 11:27 A.M., by the Regional Certified Dietary Manager. The policy, titled, Date Marking for Food Safety, indicated, .The facility adheres to a date marking system to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary and comfortable environment was maintained on 2 of 4 units. (400 hall and 500 hall).Findings include: 1. During an interview and observation, on 8/4/2025 at 10:18 A.M., Resident 56 complained of gnats and flies in her room. The resident indicated it had been going on for the past 2-3 weeks. The wall by the resident's bed had dark colored liquid speck marks and the privacy curtains were stained with dark colored specks. 2. During an observation, on 8/4/2025 at 10:41 A.M., several live flies were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 3. During an interview, on 8/4/2025 at 11:07 A.M., Resident 95 indicated she still had flies in her room. She stated, We have them (flies) bad. 4. During an observation, on 8/4/2025 at 11:52 A.M., the wall behind Resident 87's bed was gouged and had black scuff marks. 5. During an observation of the memory care unit on 8/5/2025 at 8:38 A.M., there were several fruit flies seen throughout the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed ensure 2 of 6 residents reviewed for medications were free from unnecessary medications related to having an appropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic medication and a PRN (as needed) antianxiety medication used for greater than 14 days without adequate documentation. (Resident 125 and 72).1. The closed record for Resident C was completed on 8/10/2025 at 2:45 P.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: fracture to the left femur, diabetes, end stage renal disease, depression and anxiety. Resident C's medication orders included Olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) Oral Tablet 5 MG, 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for Depression. During an interview, on 8/11/2025 at 12:10 P.M., the Director of Nursing indicated depression was not an appropriate diagnoses for the medication. There was no other diagnosis or medical symptom to support the use of Olanzapine for Resident C. 2. A record review was completed for Resident 72 on 8/7/2025 at 10:49 A.M. Diagnoses included ,but were not limited to: anxiety disorder and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan related to pressure ulcers was initiated timely for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 7) In addition, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive plan of care initiated for post traumatic stress disorder had personalized interventions for 1 of 1 residents reviewed .for post traumatic stress disorder (Resident 46) 1.A record review for Resident 7 was completed, on 8/6/2025 at 11:11 A.M. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, cardiac arrest, ischemia of lower extremity resulting in left leg gangrene and amputation, right leg extensive debridement and resulting foot drop, cardiomyopathy, sarcoidosis of the heart, type 2 diabetes, atrial fibrillation and sleep apnea. A weekly skin check, dated 4/23/25, indicated the resident had developed a new, unstageable deep tissue injury, on the right lateral forefoot near the 5th digit. The wound measured 0.4 centimeters wide by 1.6 centimeters deep. On 4/25/2025, the facility physician examined the resident's right foot wound and recommended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication orders were followed correctly regarding administering blood pressure medications and insulin and blood glucose assessments for 5 of 7 residents whose medications were reviewed. (Residents 87, 122, 2, 53 and 13) 1. The record for Resident 87 was completed on 8/4/2025 at 11:48 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to end stage renal disease, orthostatic hypotension, hypertension and aortic valve stenosis. Resident 87's Physician's Order, dated 7/21/2025, indicated to administer Midodrine (medication to treat low blood pressure) 10 milligrams (mg), 1 tablet three times a day for hypotension. The order indicated the following parameter: Do not give if SBP (systolic blood pressure) is greater than 100. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) from July 22- 29, 2025, indicated the following: -on 7/23 at 8:00 A.M., the blood pressure (B/P) was documented as 126/45 mmHg and the medication had been administered. -on 7/23 at 2:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent contractures for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Resident 95)Finding includes:During an observation and interview on 8/5/2025 at 11:04 A.M., Resident 95 indicated she had an orthosis for her left hand, but did not know were the orthosis was located in her room. The resident was not wearing any orthosis on her left hand. During observations, on 8/6/2025 at 9:22 A.M., 8/6/2025 at 11:53 A.M., 8/7/2025 at 9:55 A.M., 8/7/2025 at 2:04 P.M., 8/8/2025 at 1:20 P.M. and 8/12/2025 at 9:45 A.M., Resident 95 was lying in bed with her left hand in a fisted position. She did not have an orthosis in place. A record review for Resident 95 was on 8/6/2025 at 11:16 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: hemiplegia, lymphedema, diabetes mellitus type 2 and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/20/2025, indicated Resident 95…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were available and administered as ordered (Resident B) and failed to ensure a residents reviewed for medications was assessed for potential adverse side effects. (Resident 13) This deficient practice affected 2 of 7 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident B and 13) Findings include: 1.The closed record for resident B was reviewed on 8/8/2025 at 7:52 A.M. Diagnoses included: diabetes, kidney transplant, epilepsy, atrial fibrillation, gastro esophageal reflux disease and depression. The resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 6/24/2025. Resident B's May and June medications included the following: Apixaban 5 mg (milligram) 1 tablet twice a day; Glipizide 10 mg 1 tablet every day; Pantoprazole 40 mg 1 tablet twice a day and Pregabalin 50 mg 1 tablet once a day. A Nurse's Progress Note, dated 5/10/2025 at 9:07 P.M. indicated the Apixaban medication was unavailable and was not administered. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy related to reporting an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) Finding includes: During an interview on 1/22/25 at 12:45 P.M., Resident B indicated one night the previous week, Employee 3 entered her room to assist with changing her brief. Resident B indicated Employee 3 commented the odor was strong and sprayed her buttocks with room deodorizer and then pushed the spray can into her rectum. Resident B indicated on 1/20/25, at an unknown time, she was in the lobby of the facility and reported the incident to Employee 6. Resident B indicated on 1/22/24 during morning physical therapy, she reported the allegation to Employee 2. During an interview on 1/22/25 at 1:15 P.M., the Administrator indicated he was made aware of an allegation of abuse for the first time from Employee 2 on 1/22/25 at 12:30 P.M. The Administrator indicated he immediately suspended Employee 3, pending an investigation, reported the allegation to the State Agency, and initiated an investigation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at palatable temperatures in 1 of 1 kitchens observed (Main Kitchen). This deficient practice potentially affected 110 of 120 residents who consumed food from the main kitchen. Finding includes: During a meal observation with [NAME] 1 in the Main Kitchen, on 10/1/24 at 12:00 P.M., the food temperatures of hot foods on the steam table were a follows: pureed corn 105 F (Fahrenheit), cream corn 123 F, pureed beef 118 F, beef gravy 128 F, pepper steak 123 F, whole corn 141 and sweet potato 140 During observation of room trays on the 500 hall, conducted on 10/1/24 at 12:37 P.M., meals were transported to the unit, from the kitchen on metal covered, noninsulated carts. The last tray to be served, at 12:37 P.M., had the following food temperatures at the point of service: pepper steak 80 F, sweet potatoes 85 F and whole corn 85*F. During an interview on 10/1/24 at 12:05 P.M., [NAME] 1 indicated hot food temps should be held at or above 140 F while on the steam table. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was handled appropriately, foods were sealed appropriately, and failed to date foods when opened. This had the potential to affect 114 residents of 115 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings include: 1. An initial walk through of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager was completed on 7/29/2024 at 9:35 A.M. The following were observed: in the dry storage area was an opened/undated box of lasagna noodles not sealed, a gallon of vanilla with an opened date of 4/15/2023. In the walk-in cooler was an undated container of gravy and 3 health shakes with an expiration date of 7/23/2024, and an opened and undated box of Cream of Wheat cereal. 2. During a meal observation, on 7/29/2024 at 12:35 P.M., CNA 17 was observed to have her thumb extending over the plates' rim onto the food surface of the plate when serving 2 different residents. During an interview, on 7/29/2024 at 12:50 P.M., CNA 17 indicated her thumb should be underneath the plate. 3. During an observation, on 7/29/2024, CNA 18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-05 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were available on the same day of the request and for the desired amount for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for facility-managed personal funds. (Residents 18, 5, 31 and 8) Findings include: During an interview on 7/29/24 at 10:15 A.M., Resident 18 indicated he was able to obtain money from his facility account between the hours of 9 A.M. and 4 P.M. weekdays, and not at all on Saturday and Sunday. During an interview on 7/29/24 at 10:54 A.M., Resident 5 indicated he was only able to get five dollars from his facility account on the weekends. During an interview on 7/30/24 at 9:42 A.M., Resident 31 indicated she could only get money from her facility account until 4 P.M. weekdays, and not at all on Saturday and Sunday. During an interview on 7/30/24 at 1:15 P.M., Resident 8 indicated she was unable to get money from her facility account after 4 P.M. During an interview on 7/31/24 at 2:27 P.M., LPN 13 indicated the residents had a five dollar limit that they could take out of their facility accounts. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-05 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a surety bond sufficiently covered the total monies in the Resident Fund account. This had the potential to affect the 56 residents who had resident fund accounts managed by the facility. Finding includes: During an interview and record review of Resident Fund accounts, with the Business Office Manager (BOM) and the Executive Director, on 8/2/2024 at 8:25 A.M., the total amount in the Resident Fund accounts was $286,128.00. The BOM indicated the amount was higher than usual due to a closed account with funds from a home sale for which she was waiting on verification before sending the funds back to Medicaid. Review of the facility's Surety Bond insurance rider to cover Resident Fund monies, dated April 1, 2020, indicated the covered amount had been increased to $250,000. During an interview with the Executive Director (ED) on 8/5/2024 at 9:40 A.M. he indicated he did not know why the Corporation had not raised the Resident Fund Surety Bond amount higher. He confirmed the total amount noted on 8/2/2024 was unusually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-05 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were initiated for a resident receiving dialysis, a resident with falls and edema, and a resident with a wound, and failed to ensure baseline care plans were completed timely for a resident with an enteral feeding tube, for 4 of 27 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. (Residents 36, 107, 14 and 99) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 36 was completed on 8/01/2024 at 8:48 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, neurogenic bladder, viral hepatitis, and diabetes. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/13/2024, indicated Resident 36 was receiving dialysis. A Baseline Care Plan form, dated 6/7/2024, indicated the resident required dialysis. The form lacked any goals, interventions, and any special needs to to address the resident's current needs to properly care for the resident. During an interview, on 8/2/2024 at 2:58 P.M., the Director of Nursing indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive person-centered plans of care were created related to behaviors, a urinary tract infection, constipation, impaired vision and edema for 5 of 23 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. (Residents 28, 10, 14, 66 & 215) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 28 was reviewed on 7/31/2024, at 9:15 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cerebral infarction, unspecified dementia, atrial fibrillation, cardiomegaly, hypertension, and anxiety disorder. Resident 28's current medications included Zyprexa (antipsychotic) 10 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for dementia with agitation. A Care Plan, dated 7/28/2024, indicated the resident had target behaviors of paranoia and agitation. Interventions included, but were not limited to, assess for pain, monitor for side effects of antipsychotics and report to the physician, monthly pharmacy review of the medication regimen, offer to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide accurate orders for resuscitative wishes for 2 of 3 resident reviewed for advanced directives. (Residents 94 & 36) Findings include: 1. A record review for Resident 94 was completed on 7/31/2024 at 11:19 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, epilepsy, and diabetes mellitus type 2. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/7/24, indicated Resident 94 had severe cognitive impairment. A Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form, dated 6/1/2024, and signed by the nurse practitioner on 6/27/2024, indicated to not attempt resuscitation. A Physician's Order, dated 6/10/2024, indicated Resident 94 was a full code, indicating cardiopulmonary resuscitation to was to be completed. A Care Plan, dated 6/13/2024, indicated Resident 94 had an advanced directive of a full code. The goal, dated 6/13/2024, indicated that Resident 94's wishes would be honored. The interventions include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide resident-centered activities for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities. (Resident 93) Finding includes: During an observation on 7/29/2024 at 3:08 P.M., Resident 93 was lying in bed. There was no radio or television on in the room. On 7/30/3034 at 11:22 A.M., Resident 93 was observed in bed, with a loud hum of the oxygen concentrator and no radio or television playing. A record review was completed on 7/31/2024 at 8:57 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, anoxic brain, and tracheostomy. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/23/2024, indicated cognitive function could not be assessed due to unresponsiveness. An admission MDS, dated [DATE], indicated activity interview responses had no answers due to non-responsiveness. During observations on 7/31/2024 at 9:12 A.M. and 2:56 P.M., no music or television was observed to be on in the resident's room. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure edema was monitored for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for edema. (Resident 14) and failed to ensure antibiotic medication was administered timely for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for antibiotic use. (Resident 99) Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 7/29/2024 at 11:34 A.M., alert and oriented Resident 14 indicated he was admitted to the facility with edema to his bilateral below the knee amputation stumps. His prosthetic leg appliances were noted leaning against the wall in his room. He indicated his legs were too swollen to wear the prosthetic legs. The resident's lower thighs, knees and stump areas were noted to be swollen and looked similar in circumference to his upper thighs. A bandage was noted on the bottom of the left stump. The record for Resident 14 was reviewed on 7/31/2024 at 11:31 A.M. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, major depressive disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a range of motion program to prevent further contractures for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Resident 93) Finding includes: During an observation on 7/29/2024 at 3:11 P.M., Resident 93 was observed to have her hands in a fist-like position and her knees bent. On 7/31/2024 at 9:19 A.M., a straight legged, cushioned boot was observed sitting on a table at the end of the resident's bed. A record review was completed on 7/31/2024 at 8:57 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, anoxic brain, and tracheostomy. Past Physician's Orders included the following: - 3/28/2024-6/24/2024 Resting hand splint to right hand in the morning, and remove at night for skin integrity. - 3/27/2024-6/24/2024 Foot brace to left lower extremity drop foot. - 3/27/2024-6/24/2024 Passive range of motion to residents upper and lower extremities every shift and can be completed per Qualified Medication Assistant of Certified Nursing Assistant. A Physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a peripherally inserted central catheter care for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident 266) Finding includes: On 7/29/2024 at 9:32 A.M., Resident 266 was observed to have vancomycin and piperacillin hanging from an intravenous pole. He had a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) to his left antecubital space (the crook of the elbow), the transparent dressing, dated 7/24/2024, was folded in half with the insertion point site of the PICC line exposed. On 7/29/2024 at 2:37 P.M., the PICC line transparent dressing remained folded in half with the insertion point site of the PICC line exposed. During an observation, on 8/1/2024 at 9:45 A.M., the transparent dressing was observed to not be adhered along the lateral edges of the dressing. Resident 266 indicated he had received a shower the previous evening, and the dressing became wet. A record review was completed on 8/1/2024 at 10:14 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis, methicillin-susceptible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate tracheostomy care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tracheostomy/ventilation. (Resident 93) Finding includes: During an observation on 7/29/2024 at 9:39 A.M., Resident 93's oxygen collar was observed to be to the left of her tracheostomy stoma site. On 7/29/2024 at 10:44 A.M., Resident 93's oxygen collar was observed to be at left of the tracheostomy stoma site. At 10:49 A.M., Qualified Medication Assistant (QMA) 19 was requested to obtain an oxygen saturation. The saturation level read 85-86 percent. QMA 19 indicated it was due to the way Resident 93 slept, and many interventions had been attempted. A rolled towel was observed on the right side of the neck. At 10:51 A.M., Resident 93's oxygen saturations were observed to be at 89 percent. Resident 93 was repositioned in bed, and at 10:53 A.M., her oxygen saturations were 92 percent. A record review was completed on 7/31/2024 at 8:57 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, anoxic brain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to verify controlled substance counts for 1 of 1 medication cart observed. (SW Unit) Finding includes: During a medication storage observation of the SW Unit medication cart, on 8/2/24 at 9:43 A.M. with RN 11, the controlled medication log book had missing signatures for the count sheets on July 1, 5, 6, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18 and 27, 202.4 During an interview on 8/2/24 at 11:14 P.M., the Director of Nursing indicated all narcotic count sheets were to be signed by the oncoming and offgoing nurse/QMA for verification of residents' medications. A current policy was provided on 8/2/24 at 1:10 P.M. by the Director of Nursing. The policy, titled, Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability, indicated .for areas without automated dispensing systems, two licensed nurses account for all controlled substances and access keys at the end of each shift 3.1-25(e)(2)

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis for a resident who received an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 28) Finding includes: The record for Resident 28 was reviewed on 7/31/2024 at 9:15 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cerebral infarction, unspecified dementia, atrial fibrillation, cardiomegaly, hypertension, and anxiety disorder. Current medications for Resident 28 included Zyprexa (Olanzapine - an antipsychotic) 10 mg (milligram) 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for dementia with agitation. A Psychiatric Note, dated 7/24/2024 at 8:09 P.M., lacked an approved diagnosis and documented a plan by the psychiatric provider to continue Zyprexa despite being clinically contraindicated, as benefits outweighed risks. A professional resource, https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds, indicated the following: Olanzapine is used to treat the symptoms of schizophrenia (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff change gloves and complete hand hygiene when providing perineal care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for personal care. (Resident 47) Finding includes: During a random observation, on 7/29/2024 at 3:20 P.M., Resident 47 was observed lying on wet bed linens. Resident 47 indicated, they don't clean me up like they should. During a random observation, on 7/31/2024 at 1:23 P.M., Resident 47's call light was on. CNA 15 was observed answering the light. After the aide exited the residents' room, she indicated the room had a strong urine smell. CNA 15 indicated she smelled the urine and was not sure when he was checked or changed last. On 7/31/2024 at 1:38 P.M., CNA was observed to provide perineal care to Resident 46. CNA 16 applied gloves and obtained a wash basin and washcloth and a towel. He removed the brief, and with the same area of the washcloth wiped both sides of the residents groin, then washed the penis. He then rinsed the areas with another washcloth. With the same gloves still on, CNA 16 then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were kept in a locked cart when unattended, failed to ensure medication storage areas were free from loose medications; failed to date medications when opened during medication storage reviews for 4 of 4 medication carts observed and 2 of 3 medication rooms observed. (500, 300, 400 and 200 medication carts, 200 and 300 medication rooms) Findings include: 1. During a random observation, on 7/24/2023 at 5:35 A.M., the 500 Hall medication cart was observed to be unlocked with no staff in site of the cart. During an interview, on 7/24/2023 at 5:38 A.M., LPN 11 indicated the cart should have been locked. 2. During a medication storage observation, on 7/26/2023 at 9:35 A.M., on the 300 Hall medication cart with LPN 19 the following was observed: a loose pill was noted in a drawer. During an interview, on 7/26/2023 at 9:38 A.M., LPN 19 indicated there should be no loose pills in the medication cart. 3. During a medication room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ceiling, oven, counters, and floor were clean and in good condition in the main kitchen; failed to ensure refrigerated foods were held at safe temperatures in the walk-in cooler; failed to dispose of expired foods; failed to ensure a refrigerator was clean; and failed to label and date foods brought in by residents, in 2 of 4 pantries (400 & 500 Halls) and the main kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 95 of 95 residents who received meals out of the kitchen. Findings include: 1. During an observation of the main kitchen, on 7/20/2023 at 9:45 A.M., with the certified dietary manager (CDM) the following was observed: A hole in the ceiling directly next to the air conditioning/heating vent that had an open bag of insulation hanging down and insulation was on the floor. Two buckets and four towels were under the vent and water was present on the floor. The outside of the oven had grease and food debris. The inside of the oven had a buildup of grease. The stainless-steel counters…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms were accurately completed for 3 of 3 residents whose Advanced Directives were reviewed. (Resident 71, 72, & 4) Findings include: 1. A record review was completed on 7/21/2023 at 2:21 P.M. Resident 71's Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form lacked the following documented information: the printed treating physicians name; the date; the office telephone number and the physician's licenses number. 2. A record review was completed on 7/24/2023 at 6:31 A.M. Resident 74's Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form lacked the following documented information: the date; the office telephone number and the physician's licenses number. 3. A record review was completed on 7/21/2023 at 1:45 P.M. Resident 84's Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form lacked the following documented information: the printed treating physicians name; the date; the office telephone number and the physician's licenses number. During an interview, on 7/27/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a plysician timely of missed doses of unavailable medication for 2 of 5 residents whose medications were reviewed. ( Resident 26 & B) Findings include: 1. A record review was completed on 7/25/2023 at 11:30 A.M. Resident 26's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Multiple Sclerosis, epilepsy, depression, hypertension and diabetes. Current physician orders included: Vumerity delayed release capsule 231 mg (milligrams) 2 capsules 2 times a day related to MS (Multiple Sclerosis), and Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) 1000 mg daily. The June MAR (Medication Administration Record) indicated on June 1st the Vumerity order was documented as (3) hold/see nurses notes. The Nurses Note, dated 6/1/2023 at 9:17 P.M., indicated the Vumerity medication not given pending pharmacy delivery. The June MAR indicated on June 2nd and 3rd the Vumerity medication was documented as (7) other/see nurses notes. A Nurse's Note, dated 6/2/2023 at 10:53 A.M., indicated the Vumerity medication needs reordered. A Nurses' Note, dated 6/2/2023 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pertinent transfer and resident clinical information was completed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfers. (Resident 72) Finding includes: During an interview, on 7/20/2023 at 3:03 P.M., Resident 72 indicated he had gone to the hospital 2 weeks ago. A clinical record review was completed on 7/24/2023 at 2:12 P.M., Resident 72's diagnoses included, but were not limited to chronic kidney disease stage 3, obstructive and Reflux Uropathy, diabetes and depression. A Nurse's Note, dated 7/12/2023 at 8:45 P.M., indicated: QMA on staff contacted this writer to assess resident left Nephro tube, upon assessment this writer found left tube to be leaking urine from insertion site resident entire shirt soiled with urine. No urine noted in left leg bag and blood noted in tubing. On call NP (Nurse Practitioner) called - new orders to send resident to emergency room. A general note, dated 7/13/2023 at 2:32 A.M., indicated the resident returned from the hospital. Left nephrostomy tube was changed without incident and is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide transfer form information for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 72) Finding include: During an interview, on 7/20/2023 at 3:03 P.M., Resident 72 indicated he had gone to the hospital 2 weeks ago. A clinical record review was completed on 7/24/2023 at 2:12 P.M., Resident 72's diagnoses included, but were not limited to chronic kidney disease stage 3, obstructive and Reflux Uropathy, diabetes and depression. A Nurse's Note, dated 7/12/2023 at 8:45 P.M., indicated: QMA on staff contacted this writer to assess resident left Nephro tube, upon assessment this writer found left tube to be leaking urine from insertion site resident entire shirt soiled with urine. No urine noted in left leg bag and blood noted in tubing. On call NP (Nurse Practitioner) called - new orders to send resident to emergency room. A general note, dated 7/13/2023 at 2:32 A.M., indicated the resident returned from the hospital. During an interview, on 7/26/2023 at 10:00 A.M., the Regional Director of Clinical Operations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a care plan for the use of a continuous positive airway pressure (C-Pap) device for 1 of 28 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 15) Finding includes: During an observation on 7/20/2023 at 10:19 A.M., Resident 15's continuous positive airway pressure (C-Pap) mask was lying over the top of the machine on the bedside table. A record review was completed on 7/25/2023 at 10:36 A.M. Diagnoses included,but were not limited to: morbid obesity and renal dialysis. A Physician's Order, dated 6/22/2023, indicated a C-Pap at bedtime and as needed. A care plan was not located in the medical record for use of the C-Pap. During an interview on 7/26/2023 at 1:09 P.M., the MDS Coordinator indicated an order was placed for the C-Pap at admission on [DATE]. She indicated Resident 15 should have a care plan for the use of the C-Pap. On 7/27/2023 at 1:07 P.M., a policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans was provided by the Regional Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided timely for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activity of daily living (ADL) care. (Resident 47) Finding includes: During an interview on 7/20/2023 at 11:15 A.M., Resident 47 indicated he was not receiving his showers routinely, and staff would state they were out of hot water or there was not enough staff to complete the shower. A record review was completed on 7/24/2023 at 11:53 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: left below the knee amputation, muscle weakness, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 6/17/2023, indicated Resident 47 was dependent with the assistance of one staff member for bathing. On a Significant Change MDS Assessment, dated 5/9/2023, Resident 15 indicated it was very important to him to chose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath. The Tasks section of the electronic medical record indicated Resident 47's showers were scheduled for Tuesdays and Fridays. A Care Plan, dated 3/23/2022,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide sanitation of the continuous positive airway pressure (C-Pap) equipment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for supportive respiratory usage. (Resident 15) Finding includes: During an observation on 7/20/2023 at 10:19 A.M., Resident 15's continuous positive airway pressure (C-Pap) mask was lying over the top of the machine on the bedside table. A record review for Resident 15 was completed on 7/25/2023 at 10:36 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: morbid obesity and renal dialysis. A Physician's Order, dated 6/22/2023, indicated a C-Pap at bedtime and as needed. During an interview on 7/26/2023 at 1:03 P.M., Resident 15 indicated the C-Pap tubing, mask, and canister had not been cleaned at the facility. On 7/26/2023 at 1:04 P.M., LPN 7 indicated there was not an order for washing the mask, tubing, or canister. The only order related to the C-Pap was to wear the C-Pap at night and as needed. On 7/27/2023 at 1:07 P.M., a policy titled, CPAP/BiPAP Cleaning was provided by the Regional Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were available from the pharamacy for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for pain. (Resident 26 & B) Findings include: 1. A record review was completed on 7/25/2023 at 11:30 A.M. Resident 26's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Multiple Sclerosis, epilepsy, depression, hypertension and diabetes. Current physician orders included: Vumerity delayed release capsule 231 mg (milligrams) 2 capsules 2 times a day related to MS (Multiple Sclerosis), and Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) 1000 mg daily. The June MAR (Medication Administration Record) indicated on June 1st the Vumerity order was documented as (3) hold/see nurses notes. The Nurses Note, dated 6/1/2023 at 9:17 P.M., indicated the Vumerity medication not given pending pharmacy delivery. The June MAR indicated on June 2nd and 3rd the Vumerity medication was documented as (7) other/see nurses notes. A Nurse's Note, dated 6/2/2023 at 10:53 A.M., indicated the Vumerity medication needs reordered. A Nurses' Note, dated 6/2/2023 at 7:37 P.M., indicated Vumerity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, and comfortable environment was maintained, related to a broken towel rack, plastic wrapped around the cord of a power strip, stained ceiling tiles, broken heater, dead bugs in the light covers, and black mold on vents. (room [ROOM NUMBER], 217, 303, and 200, 400 and 500 Hall) Findings include: During an environmental tour, on 7/27/2023 at 2:30 P.M., with the Maintenance Director, Maintenance Assistant and Account Manager, the following was observed: room [ROOM NUMBER] had a broken towel rack. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a power strip plugged into the electric outlet but the cord to the power strip was still wrapped in plastic. The resident was using the power strip to power their television. There were ceiling tiles on the 200 hallway with large dark stains. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a broken baseboard heater. The 500 Hall had dead bugs that could be seen in five light covers. The 400 Hall had black mold that was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 22 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Bloomington Care CenterBloomington, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Golden Rule Care CenterRichmond, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville Care CenterMerrillville, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Richmond Care CenterRichmond, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Brandywine Care CenterGreenfield, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview Care CenterMishawaka, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Laporte Care CenterLa Porte, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Portage Care CenterPortage, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Terrace Care CenterLa Porte, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Twelfth Street Care CenterMishawaka, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Willow Springs Care CenterIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Brookview Care CenterIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Muncie Care CenterMuncie, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Woodbridge Care CenterEvansville, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare -Sycamore Village Care CenterKokomo, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Churchman Care CenterIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Lincoln Hills Care CenterTell City, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Petersburg Care CenterPetersburg, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Valparaiso Care CenterValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Woodlands Care CenterNewburgh, IN 5 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Brentwood Care CenterEvansville, IN 5 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Knox Care CenterKnox, IN

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
KNISLEY, CHADIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/01/2023
GENTRY, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/12/2022
WHICKER, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/12/2022
ENGELS, ERINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/25/2014
FENOUGHTY, DEANNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/10/2023
STARKEY, TYLERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2020
WAITE, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2020
ELKHART OPERATING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2012

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$581K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 4%Other / private 19%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $581K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$414per resident / day
operating cost
$12,600per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$362per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155685. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next