Brickyard Healthcare - Petersburg Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 63 beds and averages 46.0 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-11-21 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills set to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. The Dietary Manager was not certified. (Dietary Manager)Finding includes:On 11/17/25 at 10:13 A.M., the Dietary Manager was asked to provide her certification certificate. During an interview on 11/21/25 at 11:10 A.M., the Administrator indicated the Dietary Manager failed the test, but she is registered to take the test again. The new test date was unknown. There was another dietary staff member certified until hers expired September 2025.On 11/21/25 at 11:10 A.M., a non dated current Dietary Services Policy was provided by the Administrator and indicated, The facility employs sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to cany out the functions of the Food and Nutrition Services . 3.1-20(a)

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure notification of change for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for skin conditions (non-pressure ulcer related). The physician was not notified of significant weight loss and skin tears to the right wrist. (Resident 7, Resident 13)Findings include:1. On 11/18/25 at 8:59 A.M., Resident 13 was observed sitting in her room on her bed. A white bandage was observed on her right wrist, not dated. The resident indicated it had been there for a couple of days because she had hit her arm on her wheelchair. On 11/20/25 at 11:50 A.M., Resident 13 was observed lying on her bed. A non-dated white bandage was observed on her right wrist, falling off and brown colored discharge was able to be seen through the bandage. On 11/21/25 at 9:31 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 36 was observed to weigh the resident standing on the scale. Her weight was 93.4 lbs. On 11/19/25 at 1:16 P.M., Resident 13's clinical record was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents, unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dental services. A resident's dentures were not cleaned or taken out at night as indicated. (Resident 27)Finding includes:On 11/18/25 at 10:19 A.M., Resident 27's family member indicated during visits, she had noticed Resident 27's hygiene to be poor. She indicated due to his cognition, Resident 27 would initially refuse care, and needed encouragement and often more than one attempt before he would agree to care. She indicated some staff would take the initial refusal and move on without trying further to get the care done. On 11/19/25 at 10:10 A.M., Resident 27 was observed sitting in a recliner watching television with the lights off. The resident's mouth and lips were observed with crusty debris. Dentures were not observed at that time. On 11/19/25 at 10:43 A.M., Resident 27's clinical record was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was underweight received the appropriate services to maintain weight for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. Notifications of significant weight loss were not completed, the dietitian's recommendations of house shakes were not implemented until 15 days later, and additional interventions were not attempted after the underweight resident continued to lose weight. (Resident 13)Finding includes:On 11/21/25 at 9:31 A.M., Resident 13 was observed being weighed by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 36. Her weight, standing on the scale, was 93.4 pounds (lbs).On 11/19/25 at 1:16 P.M., Resident 13's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus type II, and anxiety. The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after being out of the facility on leave of absence, falling, and fracturing her hip.The most recent discharge Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for 1 of 3 residents observed for care. During a dressing change, a wound care Nurse Practitioner (NP) did not remove or change gloves after touching several items and did not wash hands according to policy. (Resident 46)Finding includes: On 11/19/25 at 1:55 P.M., a wound care NP was observed to change a dressing on Resident 46's leg. The NP entered the room along with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3. She put on a gown and gloves without washing or sanitizing her hands first. The NP assisted the DON and LPN 3 with rolling the resident to the right side by removing the blanket from the resident and pushing her, touching the back of her gown as well as her skin. The NP then touched the side rail, the curtain, and removed her mobile phone from her pocket, touching the screen. Without removing the gloves, the NP removed the dressings, touching the wound beds with the same gloved…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment for 6 of 13 resident rooms and 1 of 2 shower rooms observed for environment. Bathrooms had holes in the wall, exposed pipes, a baseboard peeling off, uncovered bedpans, and a floor that was badly scuffed. An air condition unit was falling off the wall in a room. Multiple sink water temperatures were higher then 120 degrees. (Rooms 136, 139, 138, 140, 141, 143, East Shower Room) Findings includes: 1. During an observation on 8/5/24 at 1:39 P.M., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom was observed with the baseboard behind the toilet peeling off and the floor had multiple scuffs. The water temperature was 120.8 degrees Fahrenheit. At that time, the resident indicated the water was hot but denied being burned. During an observation on 8/9/24 at 11:06 A.M., the same was observed but the water temperature was not rechecked. 2. During an observation on 8/5/24 at 1:50 P.M., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s water temperature was 123.3 degrees…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accommodate resident needs for 2 of 13 residents reviewed for call lights within reach. One resident failed to have an available call system in her room and one resident's call light was not within reach. (Resident 26, Resident 38) Findings include: 1. On 8/5/24 at 1:45 P.M., Resident 26 was observed sitting up in a recliner with her call light lying on the floor next to the dresser. On 8/8/24 at 9:47 A.M., Resident 26 was observed sitting up in a recliner with her head covered with a blanket and the call light lying on the floor next to the dresser. On 8/8/24 at 2:45 P.M., Resident 26 was observed sitting in her recliner while the call light was lying on the floor next to the dresser. On 8/9/24 at 11:20 A.M., Resident 26's medical records were reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to non-Alzheimer's dementia, lymphedema, chronic atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. The most recent Annual and State-Optional MDS (Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were completed accurately for 3 of 8 resident MDS Assessments reviewed (Residents 35, 11, and 43). Findings include: 1. On 8/6/24 at 1:32 P.M., Resident 35's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease, and chronic systolic heart failure. The most current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 6/25/24, indicated Resident 35 had severe cognitive impairment and administered an antianxiety, antidepressant, anticoagulant and antiplatelet during the 7 day look back period. Current Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, the following: Aspirin EC (Enteric Coated) Tablet Delayed Release (antiplatelet medication) 81 mg (milligrams), give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for STEMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction) related to atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, dated 6/17/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and complete assessments were provided for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dialysis. The medical record lacked post dialysis assessment documentation. The facility also lacked a current dialysis contract at the time of the survey. (Resident 11) Findings include: On 8/7/24 at 11:13 A.M., Resident 11's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Resident 11 was admitted [DATE]. The most recent admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 7/25/24, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and on dialysis. Current Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, the following: Dialysis treatment on Monday, Wednesday, Friday at 11:45 A.M. (Name, address, and phone number of dialysis facility). Complete pre-dialysis form, ordered 7/23/24 Post dialysis assessment. Assess site for signs/symptoms of bleeding, infection,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment orders were put in place, and weekly wound measurements were done for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. A treatment order for wounds was not put in place, wound measurements not documented weekly. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 11/15/23 at 12:15 p.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. They had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, chronic osteomyelites, left ankle and foot, type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer. Resident B admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 8/5/23. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set), assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident B's cognition was intact and had diabetic foot ulcers. Care plans were reviewed and included, but were not limited to: I have chronic osteomyelitis to left foot and ankle. I am receiving IV antibiotic therapy date initiated 6/27/23. Interventions included, but not limited to: treatments as ordered, date initiated 6/27/23. I have diabetic foot ulcers to my…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $267K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN