No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brickyard Healthcare - Golden Rule Care Center

2330 Straight Line Pike, Richmond, IN 47374 · For profit - Corporation · 170 certified beds · (765) 966-7681 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$55,102 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $55,102 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-20)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
203 E Main St · (765) 973-9245 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
631 E Main St · (765) 966-5544 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
501 W National Rd · (765) 966-2592 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2395 Straight Line Pike · (765) 962-2084

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.0%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms21.4%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.5%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.1%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication42.5%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.6%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%3.6%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.5%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.4%13.6%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine58.8%79.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.9%22.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.7%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.521.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.711.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.1%CMS range 34.2–61.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 7.8–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.2–13.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.65
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.83
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.22
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
65.3%
Total nursing turnover
63.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 170 beds and averages 87.3 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 83 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-09)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate an investigation into an allegation of sexual abuse identified by a nurse and ensure adequate protection was provided to 3 of 18 residents on the unit. (Residents 49, 50, 56, and 74) The immediate jeopardy began on 6/6/24, when 2 residents' clinical records indicated allegations of sexual abuse. The Administrator, Director of Nursing, Area [NAME] President, [NAME] President of Risk and Regulatory Compliance, and Regional Director of Clinical Operations were notified of the immediate jeopardy on 6/18/24 at 3:23 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 6/14/24, but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity level of pattern, no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 50 was reviewed on 6/17/24 at 1:10 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, and insomnia. The 5/15/24 Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated the BIMS (brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from mental/verbal abuse and threats of seclusion resulting in fear, intimidation, and mental anguish for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident B and Resident C). Using the reasonable person concept, it is likely this would lead to fear, confusion, anxiety, and intimidation for Resident B and Resident C.Findings include:1. Review of the clinical record of Resident B on 2/2/26 at 10:55 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder (a chronic mental health condition), anxiety, paranoid schizophrenia (a mental health condition characterized by intense, irrational delusions), dementia (a decline in mental abilities), and repeated falls. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident B, dated 12/5/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident did not exhibit any behaviors during these assessment time frame. The resident utilized a wheelchair for mobility. The change in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-02-04 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a major mental illness was treated appropriately and failed to implement individualized interventions resulting in a physical/mental altercation between a staff member and the residents for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for mental/psychosocial services. (Resident B). Using the reasonable person concept, the resident would likely have psychological harm of chronic or recurrent fear and anxiety from how RN 5 handled the interactions with Resident B. Findings include:Review of the clinical record of Resident B on 2/2/26 at 10:55 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder a chronic mental health condition), anxiety, paranoid schizophrenia (a mental health condition characterized by intense, irrational delusions), dementia (a decline in mental abilities), insomnia (persistent difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep) and Alzheimer's disease (progressive irreversible neurodegenerative brain disorder). The care plan for Resident B, dated 3/2/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from sexual abuse on the Alzheimer's Care Unit of the facility for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents 50, 56, and 74) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 50 was reviewed on 6/17/24 at 1:10 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, and insomnia. The 5/15/24 Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) was not conducted, as she was rarely/never understood. The staff assessment for mental status indicated she had short and long-term memory problems. She did not know the current season or that she was in a nursing home. Her cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired, in that she rarely/never made decisions. It indicated she had physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others, such as hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, grabbing, and/or abusing others sexually during one to three days of the past seven days. She had verbal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity when requesting pain medications for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident E) Findings include:During an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 on 2/2/26 at 2:37 p.m., they indicated they witnessed Registered Nurse (RN) 5 not acknowledging Resident E when Resident E wanted to speak with them about their pain medication that was due. CNA 2 indicated Resident E came to the nurse's station to speak with RN 5 who was sitting at the desk. RN 5 would not look up or acknowledge that Resident E was standing in front of her. The CNA indicated Resident E then started pounding on the desk with her cane, kicking it, while holding her communication tablet in the other hand. Resident E used a tablet to communicate. The CNA told RN 5 that Resident E was trying to get her attention, and her reply was, I know, thanks captain obvious, I know how to do my job. CNA 2 indicated RN 5 continued not to acknowledge Resident E after that was said and continued to work. RN 5 did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate and follow up with a resident related to a staff member not addressing needs and wants for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for grievances. (Resident E) Findings include:During an interview on 2/2/26 at 2:37 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 indicated she filled out a grievance form for Resident E on 1/24/26 in relation to an incident that occurred that morning at the nurse's station between Resident E and Registered Nurse (RN) 5. The morning of 1/24/26, Resident E was at the nurse's station upset and wanting to speak with RN 5 regarding her pain medication and that she was due for them. RN 5 indicated it was not time for her prn (as needed) medicine. CNA 2 indicated RN 5 would not acknowledge Resident E when she was standing at the nurse's station, and Resident E, who communicated primarily by tablet use, was pounding her cane on the desk and kicking it attempting to get RN 5's attention. Resident E was completely aware of her medications, times they were given, and times they were due again. RN 5 would not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Executive Director immediately for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident B). Finding include: Review of the clinical record of Resident B on 2/2/26 at 10:55 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder (a chronic mental health condition), anxiety, paranoid schizophrenia (a mental health condition characterized by intense, irrational delusions), dementia (a decline in mental abilities), and repeated falls. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident B, dated 12/5/25, indicated the resident cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident did not exhibit any behaviors during these assessment time frame. The resident utilized a wheelchair for mobility. During an interview with CNA 6 on 2/2/26 at 5:11 p.m., the CNA indicated in January 2026 (unsure of exact date) she witnessed RN 5 being abusive to Resident B. Resident B was having behaviors she was screaming and yelling. RN 5 requested CNA 5 to put the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete an assessment after a fall for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident B and Resident C). Findings include:1. Review of the clinical record of Resident B on 2/2/26 at 10:55 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia (a decline in mental abilities) and repeated falls. The care plan for Resident B, dated 3/2/25, indicated the resident was at risk for falls related to: a history of falls, use of medication, wandering, vitamin D deficiency, Alzheimer's disease and dementia. The resident had also had disorders of bone density. There were no interventions implemented since 4/27/2023. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident B, dated 12/5/25, indicated the resident cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident utilized a wheelchair for mobility. The change in condition progress note for Resident B, dated 1/6/26 at 4:32 a.m., indicated a new order was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin pens were current and not outdated or expired, labelled for date when opened or put into use, with the directions for use and the prescribing physician's name during observations of 2 of 2 medication carts for medication storage. (Residents 23, 24 and 53). The facility failed to ensure the Change of Shift Control Substances Count Sheet, was routinely completed with signatures of the arriving nurse for duty and the departing nurse for duty present to signify that all controlled substances were accounted for during the time period of 8-15-25 at 6:00 p.m. through 9-4-25 at 6:30 a.m. for a total of 49 entries with concerns related to missing or illegible dates, times and/or missing signatures. This missing or incomplete information had the potential to adversely affect all 29 residents of the affected South Unit. Findings include:A. During an observation on 9/4/25 at 2:21 p.m., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 8, the Hall 5 medication cart contained an Ozempic medication pen for Resident 23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity by engaging in inappropriate conversation with 1 of 4 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident 61)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 61 was reviewed on 9/2/25 at 1:15 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder, insomnia, and anxiety disorder. The bipolar disorder care plan, revised 6/24/25, indicated she had behavioral symptoms as exhibited by attempts at inappropriate conversations with staff. An interview was conducted with Resident 61 on 9/2/25 at 1:26 p.m. She indicated one day last week Housekeeper 11 informed her (Resident 61) that CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 12 told Housekeeper 11 that CNA 12 did not like Resident 61. Resident 61 did not hear or see CNA 12 say this. An interview and observation was conducted with Housekeeper 11, on 9/8/25 at 12:01 p.m., in the presence of the Housekeeping Manager. Housekeeper 11 indicated other staff don't typically talk to her about residents. I heard a couple say they didn't like one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 7 residents were directly observed to receive and consume the medications which were administered to them during 1 of 4 medication pass observations with 7 residents and 5 staff members. (Resident 19, Registered Nurse 4) Findings include: During a medication pass observation on 9-3-25 at 12:06 p.m., with Registered Nurse (RN) 4, she was observed to prepare two tablets of buspirone hydrochloride 5 milligrams (mg) for a total of 10 mg to administer to Resident 19. She then crushed the medication and added it to a container of yogurt and placed it on her lunch tray. RN 4 indicated the resident does not like to have staff remain in her room while she eats lunch, including the yogurt which contained the medication. So we just leave the yogurt on her tray and check back. Normally, we leave the door cracked so we can check in on her to make sure she takes the med. At 12:12 p.m., RN 4 left Resident 19 unattended with the cup of yogurt with the medication in it. At that time, Resident 19 requested that her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident to the restroom in a timely manner for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). (Resident 2)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 9/4/25 at 11:45 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, retention of urine, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and emphysema. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/5/25, indicated Resident 2 was cognitively intact and utilized a manual wheelchair. Resident 2 indicated he had a Foley catheter (a thin tube inserted into the urethra to drain urine from the bladder) removed the day before, on 9/3/25. During an observation on 9/4/25 at 12:42 p.m., Resident 2 had his call light on. The Registered Dietician (RD) walked into Resident 2's room, and the resident indicated he needed help going to the restroom. The RD then went down the hallway to inform Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 5 that Resident 2 needed assistance to the restroom. CNA 5 was passing meal trays with CNA 6. CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement individualized pressure ulcer prevention and treatment of rotating the resident from the bed to the recliner every two hours as ordered by the physician for a stage 4 pressure ulcer (full thickness skin loss with extensive destruction; tissue necrosis or damage to muscle, bone, or supporting structure), failed to investigate the root cause of the stage 4 pressure ulcer and failed to date a pressure ulcer dressing for a stage 3 (full thickness tissue loss) pressure ulcer for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 11). Finding include: During an observation on 9/5/25 at 11:39 a.m., Resident 11 was sitting in a wheelchair with a pressure reducing cushion. The resident had an air mattress on the bed. Resident 11 had a recliner with a pressure-relieving cushion in place in the room. During an observation on 9/5/25 at 1:25 p.m., Resident 11 was eating lunch independently and remained in the wheelchair with the cushion. The resident was in the same position. Resident 11 had a recliner with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a nutritional supplement as ordered by the physician for a resident who had significant weight loss for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for weight loss (Resident 7). Findings include:The clinical record of Resident 7 was reviewed on 9/5/25 at 10:20 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia, pain, hypertensive heart disease, and weakness. The care plan for Resident 7, dated 5/5/25, indicated the resident had a nutritional problem related to cerebral infarction with hemiplegia affecting resident's right dominant side requiring adaptive equipment with meals. The resident triggered for malnourishment related to history of significant weight changes. The interventions included, but were not limited to, provide nutrition interventions as ordered. A physician's order for Resident 7, dated 6/13/25, indicated the resident was ordered yogurt or equivalent with meals. Resident 7's weight, on 7/1/25, was 153.8 pounds and the resident's weight, on 8/31/25, was 134. This indicated the resident lost…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a Hemoglobin A1C lab, as ordered, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 75)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 75 was reviewed on 9/9/25 at 12:19 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus. The 8/17/25 diabetes mellitus care plan indicated an intervention was to administer diabetes medication as ordered by the doctor, and to monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. The Medications section of Physician 13's, 7/30/25, progress note indicated to give one 750 mg tablet of Metformin Extended Release one time a day related to type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Assessments and Plans section of the note indicated, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with other specified complication: Recheck hemoglobin A1c and consider changing metforminto [sic] glargine insulin. The 7/30/25 physician order indicated to obtain a Hemoglobin A1c level. There were no Hemoglobin A1c level results in the clinical record after the above 7/30/25 order. An interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote residents' dignity by not answering call lights in a timely manner resulting in incontinence (Resident M, Resident Q, and Resident U), not assisting with activities of daily living (ADLs) as preferred with showers and after toileting care (Resident J), and refusing to assist Resident M to get into their recliner from the bed at night, and refusing to heat up a resident's food when the resident reported the food was cold (Resident M) for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for dignity.Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident J was reviewed on 7/14/25 at 1:45 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of right lower leg and muscle weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/20/25, indicated Resident J was cognitively intact, used a wheelchair for mobility, frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel, and required supervision or touching assistance with mobility. During an interview with Resident J’s family member on 7/15/25 at 9:50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer insulin as ordered by the physician for Resident C and Resident V, failed to complete a weekly skin assessment timely for Resident C, and failed to complete neurological checks after a fall for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for falls and for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident C, Resident V, Resident T, and Resident O).Findings include:1. During an interview with Confidential Staff 5 on 7/15/25 at 12:23 p.m., they indicated the facility was not conducting weekly skin assessments for residents and was not administering insulin as ordered by the physician. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 7/15/25 at 11:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, Parkinson disease, chronic kidney disease, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, muscle weakness, difficulty walking and morbid (severe) obesity. A physician’s order, dated July 2025, indicated the resident was ordered insulin glargine (long-acting insulin) 24 units at bedtime for diabetes. The instructions were to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of urinalysis results (Resident C), failed to implement contact isolation or enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for a resident with multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) (Resident C), failed to move a resident to a private room after a resident was revealed to have a MDRO (bacteria or other microorganisms that have become resistant to multiple antibiotics) (Resident C), and failed to implement EBP for Resident K for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident C and Resident K).B. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly store an ice scoop to ensure infection control measures for 1 of 1 random observation.Findings include: 1. During an interview with Confidential Staff 4 on 7/15/25 at 12:23 p.m., they indicated Resident C had a urinalysis completed, in December 2024, with the diagnoses of providencia stuartii (bacteria that was considered a MDRO). The facility did not implement any EBP or move the resident to a private room until April 2025. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 3/27/2025 at 1:00 p.m. The medical diagnoses included emphysema and diabetes. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/4/2025, indicated Resident D was cognitively intact and received insulin. A diabetes management care plan, revised 3/2/2025, indicated Resident D had diabetes mellitus. Interventions included to monitor Resident D's blood glucose as well as education about compliance and to document and report noncompliance. A respiratory care plan, revised 3/2/2025, indicated Resident D had emphysema and was at risk for impaired gas exchange. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered. A physician order, started on 7/5/2024 and discontinued on 3/25/2025, indicated Resident D received sliding scale insulin based upon the blood glucose reading. The order stated to inject as per sliding scale: if blood glucose was 150 - 200 to administer four units; if blood glucose was 201 - 250 to administer eight units; if blood glucose was 251 - 300…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with their preference to have the capability to open their bedroom window to get fresh air for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs/preferences (Resident C, Resident E, Resident F, and Resident B). Findings include: 1. Review of the clinical record of Resident C, on 3/17/25 at 12:25 p.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, respiratory failure, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid (severe) obesity, diabetes, age related debility. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident C, dated 1/15/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident had no behavior consisting of wandering. It was important to the resident to get fresh air when the weather was good. During an interview with Resident C's family member on 3/17/25 at 2:07 p.m., they indicated the resident was hot one day and requested for the family member to open their window to get some fresh air. Resident C's window was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers and/or baths to prevent body odor and failed to provide incontinent care timely to a resident to promote dignified care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident C). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 3/17/25 at 12:25 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, respiratory failure, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid (severe) obesity, diabetes, age related debility. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident C, dated 1/15/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident was dependent for showers/bathing, substantial/maximal assistance for upper dressing, and dependent for lower body dressing. The resident had no behavior consisting of rejection of care. The resident was frequently incontinent of their bowels and bladder. During an interview with Resident C's family member on 3/17/25 at 2:07 p.m., they indicated the facility was not providing the resident with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident when they had outside physician appointments for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for notification of appointments (Resident E). Findings include: During an interview with Resident E on 3/17/25 at 1:40 p.m., they indicated they had several outside doctor appointments, and the resident was never notified about them. The resident indicated the man that drove the bus to appointments would show up at their door and say, let's go, you have an appointment. The resident indicated this happened at least four times and maybe even more than that. The resident indicated they were an early riser, so they were thankful they were always dressed and ready. The resident indicated they did not want to cause any trouble or get anyone in trouble, they just felt it was courteous to let them know they had an appointment. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 on 3/17/25 at 1:45 p.m., they verified Resident E had five outside doctor appointments in January 2025, February 2025, and March 2025. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for infections. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record of Resident B was reviewed on 3-17-25 at 11:45 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes with neuropathy and abnormal gait and mobility. Her most recent Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1-30-25, indicated she was cognitively intact and required the use of a wheelchair for mobility. It indicated she had a foot infection, was receiving an antibiotic, and received dressing changes to her feet. A review of a note from a podiatrist, dated 1-14-25, indicated she had started on an antibiotic for one week for cellulitis to the second toe of her left foot. A follow-up visit note, dated 1-28-25, indicated her affected toe still showed signs of cellulitis and a second round of antibiotics was ordered for another seven days. A care plan was not located in Resident B's clinical record related to the cellulitis of the left second toe. In an interview with the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow and institute their antibiotic stewardship policies and protocols for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for infections, related to cellulitis. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record of Resident B was reviewed on 3-17-25 at 11:45 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes with neuropathy and abnormal gait and mobility. Her most recent Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1-30-25, indicated she was cognitively intact and required the use of a wheelchair for mobility. It indicated she had a foot infection, was receiving an antibiotic, and received dressing changes to her feet. A review of a note from a podiatrist, dated 1-14-25, indicated she had started on an antibiotic for one week for cellulitis to the second toe of her left foot. A follow-up visit note dated, 1-28-25, indicated her affected toe still showed signs of cellulitis and a second round of antibiotics was ordered for another seven days. In an interview on 3-17-25 at 12:58 p.m., with the facility's Infection Preventionist, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Administrator immediately of allegations of sexual abuse on the Alzheimer's Care Unit of the facility for 3 of 18 residents on the Alzheimer's Care Unit. (Residents 50, 56, and 74) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 50 was reviewed on 6/17/24 at 1:10 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, and insomnia. The 5/15/24 Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) was not conducted, as she was rarely/never understood. The staff assessment for mental status indicated she had short and long-term memory problems. She did not know the current season or that she was in a nursing home. Her cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired, in that she rarely/never made decisions. It indicated she had physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others, such as hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, grabbing, and/or abusing others sexually during one to three days of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement residents' behavior care plans and provide adequate monitoring and supervision to timely address residents' behaviors for 6 of 18 residents on the Alzheimer's Care Unit. (Residents 11, 14, 50, 51, 56, 57, 67, and 74) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 50 was reviewed on 6/17/24 at 1:10 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, and insomnia. The 5/15/24 Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) was not conducted, as she was rarely/never understood. The staff assessment for mental status indicated she had short term and long-term memory problems. She did not know the current season or that she was in a nursing home. Her cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired, in that she rarely/never made decisions. It indicated she had physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others, such as hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, grabbing, and/or abusing others sexually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to preserve the dignity of a dependent resident who required the assistance of staff for activities of eating and dressing by removing food debris from the resident's clothing after a meal and provide incontinent care in a timely manner for a resident dependent on staff assistance with toileting for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident 2 and confidential resident) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 6/18/2024 at 11:10 a.m. The medical diagnosis included heart failure. A baseline activities of daily living care plan, dated 5/28/2024, indicated to assist Resident 2 with eating as needed. This care plan did not indicate the amount of assistance, or the number of staff needed. An admission Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 5/30/2024, indicated that Resident 2 was cognitively impaired, independent with eating, and needed substantial to maximum assistance with dressing. An observation and interview, on 6/14/2024 at 11:30 a.m., with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote a clean environment for Resident 2 by having dried debris built up on her recliner, thick dust built up on a box fan utilized by Resident 17, and by having dust built up on an open ledge under the seat and food debris on the footboard of Resident 46's motorized scooter for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for a clean environment. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 6/18/2024 at 11:10 a.m. The medical diagnosis included heart failure. An admission Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 5/30/2024, indicated that Resident 2 was cognitively impaired. An observation and interview, on 6/14/2024 at 11:30 a.m., with Family Member 12 indicated that Resident 2 had declined since she was admitted to the facility at the end of May. Family Member 12 tried to come every day and spend time with her mother usually between 11:00 and 11:30 a.m. Resident 2 needed assistance with eating and there had been multiple times that Resident 2 would be found covered in food on her clothing, have food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately encode minimum data set assessments for Resident 17's prognosis of six months or less and for Resident 54's utilization of hospice services for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for minimum data set assessment hospice accuracy. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 17 was reviewed on 6/18/2024 at 1:22 p.m. The medical diagnosis included respiratory failure. An Annual Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 3/28/2024, indicated Resident 17 was cognitively impaired, did not have a life expectancy of six months or less, but utilized hospice services. A physician order, dated 3/21/2023, indicated for Resident 17 to receive hospice services. A hospice standing order, dated 12/31/2023, located inside of Resident 17's hospice binder at the nurses' station. The order indicated that Resident 17 had a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less. 2. The clinical record for Resident 54 was reviewed on 6/17/2024 at 11:05 a.m. The medical diagnosis included diabetes with neuropathy. A Significant Change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident with eating (Resident 2) and a dependent resident with shaving to their preference (Resident 54) for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 6/18/2024 at 11:10 a.m. The medical diagnosis included heart failure. A baseline activities of daily living care plan, dated 5/28/2024, indicated to assist Resident 2 with eating as needed. This care plan did not indicate the amount of assistance, or the number of staff needed. An admission Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 5/30/2024, indicated that Resident 2 was cognitively impaired, independent with eating, and needed substantial to maximum assistance with dressing. An observation and interview, on 6/14/2024 at 11:30 a.m., with Family Member 12 indicated that Resident 2 had an overall decline in their condition since they were admitted to the facility at the end of May. Family Member 12 tried to come every day to spend time with her mother. She usually arrived…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change the humidification for Resident 2's oxygen concentrator for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care needs. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 6/18/2024 at 11:10 a.m. The medical diagnosis included heart failure. An admission Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 5/30/2024, indicated that Resident 2 was cognitively impaired. A physician order for Resident 2, dated 5/24/2024, indicated to change prefilled bottles on her oxygen concentrator and humifaction weekly and as needed. An observation conducted, on 6/13/2024 at 11:45 a.m., noted Resident 2 sitting in her BRODA chair with her daughter sitting next to her. Resident 12 was utilizing oxygen via nasal cannula with the humidification bottle empty and labelled 6/6/2024. An observation conducted, on 6/14/2024 at 11:30 a.m., noted Resident 2 sitting in her BRODA chair with her daughter sitting next to her. Resident 12 was utilizing oxygen via nasal cannula with the humidification bottle empty and labelled 6/6/2024. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-04-05 · tag F0839 — widespread
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a staff member working in the capacity of a licensed nurse had a current license to practice in Indiana who had the ability to care for 84 or 84 residents. Findings include: The employee records were reviewed on 4/4/2023 at 1:30 p.m. The nursing license for LPN 1 was indicated as Pending Application. An interview Professional Licensing Agency Representative on 4/5/2023 at 11:21 a.m., indicated LPN 1 does not have a compact nursing license, but had an application for Indiana licensure based on endorsement (reciprocity) that was received in January 2023. As of 4/5/23, the application for Indiana licensure is still pending and LPN 1 is not able to work independently in Indiana at this time. An interview with the Administrator on 4/5/2023 at 12:45 p.m., indicated that LPN 1 was pending license for reciprocity and the facility was under the impression she could work as a nurse while her application was pending. The facility does not have a policy for staff licensure, but they follow the State guidelines to employ staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely notification of the physician and/or resident representative for cognitively impaired residents of a skin-related issues of a pressure area, bruise and redness and of a significant weight loss for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for notification of a change in condition. (Residents B and N) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident N was reviewed on 4-4-23 at 10:45 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic ischemic heart disease, hypertension and occlusion, history of falls, epilepsy and stenosis of unspecified carotid artery. His most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1-12-23, indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired, was at risk for skin pressure ulcers, but had no pressure ulcers or other skin issues. A review of Resident N's progress notes, dated 4-2-23 at 10:29 a.m., an unidentified staff CNA had reported to the licensed nurse redness to resident sacral area, resident had several loose stools, barrier cream applied after incontinence care. Bruising to left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record record review, the facility failed to complete an investigation and report an allegation of misappropriation of property for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for missing personal property. (Resident 78) Findings include: During an interview, on 3/29/23 at 1:50 p.m., Resident 78 indicated she had a cell phone stolen in December and the facility hasn't done anything to find it. She said she reported it to a nurse but couldn't remember her name. Resident 78 indicated she had left the cell phone in her room when she went to therapy, and it was gone when she returned. She talked to several people and was told RN 8 would investigate. RN 8 had asked her if she had a 'find my phone app' and she did not. Resident 78 told her she didn't have service on it that day. Resident 78 said she bought a new phone and nothing else was done. No one has ever gotten back with her or said they were looking for the phone. Resident 78 indicated she was still paying on the phone. Resident 78's record was reviewed, on 3/31/23 at 1:33 p.m., and indicated diagnoses that included, but were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-05 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate transfer and discharge paperwork provided to a resident upon transfer to an area hospital was included in the resident's clinical record for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 11) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 4-5-23 at 10:40 a.m. It indicated her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetic polyneuropathy. A progress note of a telehealth visit by a nurse practitioner (NP), dated 2-7-23, indicated Resident 11 had a cough and shortness of breath of one week duration. She ordered for the resident to have a chest xray and to start routine breathing treatments with plans to follow clinically. A progress note, change of condition notation, dated 1-7-23 at 9:59 p.m., indicated the chest xray results indicated a right basilar pneumonia and effusion and the results had been sent to the NP on call. The NP ordered for an oral antibiotic to be started. The resident requested to be sent to a local…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments for Resident C and Resident F for 2 of 14 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 4/3/2023 at 1:05 p.m. The medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and Alzheimer's disease. A 5-day MDS Assessment, dated 3/15/2023, indicated that Resident C had an ostomy. A Significant Change of Condition MDS Assessment, dated 3/29/2023, indicated that Resident C was receiving hospice care but did not have a life expectancy prognosis of 6 months or less. An interview with MDS Nurse on 4/3/2023 at 2:40 p.m. indicated that Resident C did not have an ostomy for the 3/15/2023 assessment and should have been coded for 6 months or less prognosis for the 3/29/2023 assessment. A physician statement, dated 3/25/2023, indicated that Resident C had a 6 months or less life expectancy if disease processes ran their normal courses. 2. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed for the use of medications for hypothyroidism, hypertension and anti-platelets medications for 2 of 25 residents reviewed for care plans. (Residents F and N) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident N was reviewed on 4-4-23 at 10:45 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic ischemic heart disease, hypertension and occlusion and stenosis of unspecified carotid artery. A review of his current medications indicated he was physician ordered for the use of Plavix Tablet, an anti-platelet medication, 75 milligrams (mg) once daily related to his diagnosis of chronic ischemic heart disease. This medication was last ordered on 12-14-22. In an interview on 4-5-23 at 11:22 a.m., she indicated she was unable to locate a care plan for the use of Plavix. She indicated she ensured a care plan was developed today for its use. I don't know how we missed this because we had corporate do an audit on care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide hair care and nail care for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Activities Of Daily Living (ADL) (Resident J and Resident H). Findings include: 1.) During an observation on 3/29/23 at 1:43 p.m., Resident H was sitting in a geriatric chair in the common area with greasy, dirty and uncombed hair. Review of the record Resident H on 3/31/23 at 10:10 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, fracture of shaft of left femur, dehydration, rhabdomyolysis, anxiety, hypertension, dementia and history of falling. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident 53, dated 3/13/23, indicated the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making. The resident was totally dependent of two people to transfer and did not ambulate. The resident required extensive assistance of two people for personal hygiene and totally dependent of two people for bathing. The plan of care for Resident H, dated 3/15/23, indicated the resident had physical functioning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer subcutaneous fluids as ordered by a provider for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medication compliance. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/3/2023 at 10:10 a.m. The medical diagnoses included white matter disease and covid-19. A Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 7/25/2022, indicated that Resident B was severely cognitively impaired and was not dehydrated. A comprehensive metabolic panel, dated 7/28/2022, indicated that Resident B had an elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) of 71 mm/dl. A normal range was listed as 7-25. An elevated BUN can indicate changes with the kidneys and hydration status. A nurse practitioner's note for Resident B, dated 7/27/2022, contained an addendum on 8/2/2022 that stated .BUN 71, creatinine 1.0. Verbal order given to nurse for 500ml [milliliter] bolus of 0.9% NS SQ [normal saline subcutaneously] . An interview with DON on 4/4/2022 at 2:45 p.m. indicated she could not find the order for fluids on Resident B's medical record nor where he had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to timely initiate treatment as ordered to a pressure area to the right heel and failed to follow up on a pressure area to the left heel for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure areas (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/3/2023 at 10:10 a.m. The medical diagnoses included white matter disease and covid-19. A Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 7/25/2022, indicated that Resident B was severely cognitively impaired, was at risk for developoing pressure areas, and had three stage two pressure areas. A wound nurse note, dated 7/20/2023, indicated Resident B had a pressure area to the right lateral heel with a dressing of skin prep twice a day. The medication administration record for Resident B indicated skin prep to the right lateral heel was not stated until 7/28/2023. A nursing progress note, dated 7/21/2022, indicated Resident B had a pressure are of stage two to the left heel with measurements of 3.8 x 2.78 x 0 centimeters (cm). A weekly skin assessment, dated 7/25/2022,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain oxygen at the physician's ordered flow rate, and failed to date the oxygen tubing. This affected 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 34) Findings include: On 3/29/23 at 12:24 p.m., Resident 34 was seated in her recliner, her oxygen concentrator was set on 1 and 1/2 liters per minute and her oxygen tubing was not dated. On 3/31/23 at 11:21 a.m., LPN 1 checked for a date on the oxygen tubing and said it was dated 3/20/23. She asked Resident 34 if they had changed the tubing when they changed the water bottle, and the resident said no. LPN 1 told the resident she would get get new tubing because it should have been changed a few days ago, and she got new tubing and replaced it. Resident 34's record was reviewed on 3/31/23 at 11:35 a.m. and indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure with low blood oxygen, atrial fibrillation, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, congestive heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a CMS-approved (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid) indication for the use of an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. (Resident 55) Findings include: The clinical record of Resident 55 was reviewed on 3-31-23 at 10:50 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, other specified depressive episodes, generalized anxiety, other Alzheimer's disease and dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere with behavioral disturbance. It indicated he was admitted to the facility less than 6 months ago and was admitted into the facility's secured memory care unit. His admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1-23-23, indicated he was severely cognitively impaired. It indicated he was admitted to the facility and received anti-psychotic medications 7 of 7 days each week. His admission medication orders indicated he was prescribed Zyprexa, an anti-psychotic medication, 7.5 milligrams (mg) twice daily for behavioral disturbance. Behavioral documentation, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-05 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to timely report out of range lab results to the medical provider for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for laboratory services. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/3/2023 at 10:10 a.m. The medical diagnoses included white matter disease and covid-19. A Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 7/25/2022, indicated that Resident B was severely cognitively impaired. A comprehensive metabolic panel, dated 7/28/2022, indicated that Resident B had an elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) of 71 mm/dl. A normal range was listed as 7-25. An elevated BUN can indicate changes with the kidneys and hydration status. The laboratory report was indicated as reviewed on 8/1/2022. A nurse practitioner's note for Resident B, dated 7/27/2022, contained an addendum on 8/2/2022 that stating intervention for elevated BUN. An interview with the DON on 4/4/2023 at 2:45 p.m. indicated she could not find where the physician was notified of the laboratory results from 7/28/2022 prior to addendum dated for 8/2/2022. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-05 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to follow up on a recommendation for a dental consultation for a Resident F for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for dental services. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 4/3/2023 at 10:55 a.m. The medical diagnoses included dementia and stroke. A Significant Change of Condition Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated that Resident F was cognitively impaired. A nutrition at risk progress note, dated 1/5/2023, indicated a recommendation for a dental consult. An interview with the DON on 4/4/2023 at 2:15 p.m. indicated that the recommendation was never conveyed to the social service director or family in January, but Resident F's family declined dental services on 3/31/2023. A policy entitled, Dental Services, was provided by the Administrator on 4/5/2023 at 2:05 p.m. The policy indicated, .It is the policy of the facility to assist residents in obtaining routine (to the extent covered under the State plan) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-05 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide routine dental services for for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for dental services (Resident H and Resident 11). Findings include: 1.) During an observation on 3/29/23 at 1:43 p.m., Resident H was sitting in the common area, the resident had visible teeth. Review of the record Resident H on 3/31/23 at 10:10 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, fracture of shaft of left femur, dehydration, rhabdomyolysis, anxiety, hypertension, dementia and history of falling. The plan of care for Resident H, dated 11/22/22, indicated the resident was at risk for dental problems related to some or all natural. The interventions included, but were not limited to, refer for dental services as needed. The nutritional assessment for Resident H, dated 3/13/23, indicated the resident was at risk for malnutrition. The resident had dental problems and received a puree diet. Resident follows a Puree diet related to dentition & dysphagia diagnosis. The assessment was signed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$55,102 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $55,102 — penalty dated 2024-06-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 22 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Bloomington Care CenterBloomington, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Elkhart Care CenterElkhart, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville Care CenterMerrillville, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Richmond Care CenterRichmond, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Brandywine Care CenterGreenfield, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview Care CenterMishawaka, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Laporte Care CenterLa Porte, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Portage Care CenterPortage, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Terrace Care CenterLa Porte, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Twelfth Street Care CenterMishawaka, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Willow Springs Care CenterIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Brookview Care CenterIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Muncie Care CenterMuncie, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Woodbridge Care CenterEvansville, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare -Sycamore Village Care CenterKokomo, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Churchman Care CenterIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Lincoln Hills Care CenterTell City, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Petersburg Care CenterPetersburg, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Valparaiso Care CenterValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Woodlands Care CenterNewburgh, IN 5 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Brentwood Care CenterEvansville, IN 5 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Knox Care CenterKnox, IN

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ADAMS, LYNNIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/24/2016
GENTRY, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/12/2022
WHICKER, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/12/2022
ENGELS, ERINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/25/2014
FENOUGHTY, DEANNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/10/2023
STARKEY, TYLERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2020
WAITE, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2020
GGNSC RICHMOND LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2012

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$513K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 4%Other / private 29%

This home reported $513K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$341per resident / day
operating cost
$10,369per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$340per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155264. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next