No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brickyard Healthcare - Terrace Care Center

1900 Andrew Ave, La Porte, IN 46350 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 176 certified beds · (219) 362-7014 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (219) 362-7014 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jun 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
900 I St · (219) 324-1600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.7 mi
1302 W State Road 2 · (219) 362-7009 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI0.7 mi
1234 W State Road 2 · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1400 Andrew Ave · (219) 325-9622 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.6%11.0%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.6%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms19.2%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%3.9%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.7%11.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.4%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.9%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%3.6%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.3%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.9%13.6%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.4%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.2%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.9%22.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.2%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.961.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.781.441.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 145 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
30.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 30.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.1%CMS range 36.1–54.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 8.8–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge30.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge33.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge29.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.8%CMS range 6.6–13.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
0.68
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.82
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.17
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
38.5%
Total nursing turnover
23.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 135.0 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-27)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered related to not following pain indicator parameters for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident C) Finding includes: Resident C's record was reviewed on 6/11/26 at 10:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, high blood pressure, COPD, depression, and anxiety. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/11/26, indicated the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making. Eating and oral hygiene required substantial to maximum assistance. All other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) required dependent care. A Physician's Order, dated 2/4/25, indicated to administer Morphine Sulfate 0.25 milliliters every four hours as needed for severe pain rated seven to ten, or for shortness of breath (SOB). The Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed from April 2026 through June 2026. The PRN order for Morphine indicated to administer for severe pain rated from seven to ten. The following dates did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were updated and in place to prevent injury for a resident with two falls in one day for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B)Finding includes:Record review for Resident B was completed on 12/1/25 at 10:31 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), weakness, anxiety, osteoarthritis, diabetes, and high blood pressure.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/13/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident required substantial/maximum assistance with shower/bathing, toileting, upper/ lower body dressing, and putting on footwear.A Care Plan, dated 10/14/25, indicated the resident was at risk for falls related to deconditioning and balance problems. Approaches were to keep environment well lit, clutter free, and keep personal items within reach. There were no revisions or updates added.During the month of October 2025, Resident B had two falls on 10/26/25.A Progress Note, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented related to incontinence logs for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). (Resident C)Finding includes:On 12/2/25 at 8:37 a.m., CNA 2 was observed going into Resident C's room to perform ADL care. The resident was calm and sitting up in his bed wearing a hospital gown. No concerns were noted. The record for Resident C was reviewed on 12/2/23 at 9:18 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's, diabetes, weakness, depression and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/14/25, indicated the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making. The resident required dependent care with toileting, shower/bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, and putting on footwear.A Care Plan, last reviewed on 9/3/25, indicated the resident had an ADL self-care deficit. Interventions were to provide incontinence care as needed, and to observe/document/report to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were held based on insulin and blood pressure parameters for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for insulin and 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents G, E, and H) The facility also failed to ensure discolorations were monitored and treatments were obtained for venous stasis ulcers and frequent diarrhea for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for skin conditions non-pressure related (Residents F and D) and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for constipation and diarrhea. (Resident C) The facility also failed to ensure recommendations were carried out from specialty physicians for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for change in condition. (Resident H) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident G was reviewed on 6/25/25 at 12:57 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes and Parkinson's disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/4/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and received insulin injections. A Care Plan, reviewed on 4/28/25, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place and implemented related to the storage of wash basins, urinals, and bed pans, the changing of gloves during wound care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, and the lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) during 1 of 1 intravenous (IV) medication administration. (The Memory Unit, Residents 15 and 109) Findings include: 1. During the Environmental Tour on 6/27/25 at 2:12 p.m., with the Maintenance Supervisor and the Administrative Consultant, the following was observed: The Memory Unit a. In the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER], there were two urinals hanging from the grab bar located next to the toilet. The closet located in the bathroom had one wash basin and two bed pans stacked on top of each other. The wash basin and bed pans were not contained. Two residents shared the bathroom. b. There was a wash basin on the floor underneath the sink in the bathroom of room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had physician's orders for medications and an assessment to self-administer their own medications for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Residents B and H) Findings include: 1. During random observations on 6/23/25 at 3:07 p.m. and 6/25/25 at 8:41 p.m., a bottle of carboxymethylcellulose sodium ophthalmic solution (an eye lubricant) eye drops and a Ventolin HFA (an inhaled breathing medication) inhaler were observed on Resident H's bedside table. During an interview on 6/25/25 at 8:41 a.m., the resident indicated he self-administered the eye drops and inhaler when he needed them. The resident's record was reviewed on 6/24/25 at 2:59 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The 3/20/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making, and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs) and transfers. A Physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food consumption logs were completed for residents with a history of weight loss for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 107) Finding includes: The record for Resident 107 was reviewed on 6/24/25 at 3:50 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, dementia, Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease, bipolar disorder, chronic kidney disease, high blood pressure, depression, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The 5/7/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making, needed supervision with eating and weighed 171 pounds with no current weight loss. A Physician's Order, dated 6/19/25, indicated a regular mechanical soft/easy chew regular thin liquid diet. The recorded weights were: 4/2/25 180 pounds 4/14/25 169 pounds 4/20/25 169 pounds 4/22/25 171 pounds 4/27/25 171 pounds 5/5/25 171 pounds 6/2/25 173 pounds…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was set at the correct flow rate for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident F) Finding includes: On 6/24/25 at 10:15 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Resident F was observed in his room seated on the side of his bed. The resident had oxygen in use by the way of a nasal cannula. The resident's oxygen concentrator was set at 3 1/2 liters. On 6/25/25 at 9:10 a.m., the resident was again observed in his room with oxygen per nasal cannula in use. The oxygen concentrator was set at 3 1/2 liters. The record for Resident F was reviewed on 6/26/25 at 11:42 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and dyspnea (difficulty breathing). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/29/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. A Care Plan, dated 2/22/25, indicated the resident had oxygen therapy related to COPD and ineffective gas exchange. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage related to pre-filled saline syringes used to flush PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) lines not stored securely, an expired insulin vial, and an expired emergency drug kit (EDK) box for 1 of 1 resident observed during medication pass, 1 of 3 medication carts observed and 1 of 2 medication rooms observed. (Resident 109, a Rainbow Unit medication cart and the Memory Unit medication room) Findings include: 1. During medication pass on [DATE] at 7:53 a.m., RN 3 was observed preparing to administer an Intravenous (IV) antibiotic medication through Resident 109's PICC line. The RN entered the resident's room with the IV antibiotic and two 10 cubic centimeters (cc) normal saline pre-filled syringes. She flushed the resident's PICC line with one of the pre-filled normal saline syringes, connected the IV antibiotic and turned on the pump. She told the resident she would be back in 30 minutes to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for a dependent resident related to incontinence care and providing assistance in getting out of bed in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Resident D) Finding includes: On 5/19/25 at 8:50 a.m., Resident D was observed lying in her bed with her breakfast covered and sitting on her bedside table. The resident indicated she had not been able to eat breakfast yet because she was told wound care was supposed to come see her next and that was 40 minutes ago. She liked to get up and out of bed to eat and they told her they would get her up after her wound treatment. The resident also indicated a nurse's aide had put her diaper on wrong during the night and that's why I peed the bed all night long, so now I'm stuck sitting in this puddle. The resident lifted the blanket to the side and lifted her body up to reveal a large wet spot in the middle of her bed that covered the middle half of the bed. The resident's brief was dry and had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered related to antibiotic therapy for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for Intravenous Therapy and failed to ensure wound treatments were completed and signed out as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. (Residents C, F and G) Findings include: 1. Resident C's record was reviewed on 5/19/25 at 9:38 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue unspecified, depression, hypertension (high blood pressure), kidney failure, asthma, and pain in unspecified hip. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/24/25, indicated Resident C was cognitively intact for daily decision making. Eating, oral hygiene, personal hygiene, and upper body dressing required set up or clean up assistance. Toileting required supervision or touching assistance. Shower and bathing required partial/moderate assistance, and lower body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's safety after an exit alarm sounded for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents. (Resident C) The deficient practice was corrected on 10/4/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. The facility completed an investigation and inserviced staff and families regarding elopement and alarm procedures. Finding includes: The record for Resident C was reviewed on 10/24/24 at 11:23 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, sleep disorder, weakness, fall, dementia with anxiety, major depressive disorder, and fracture of the neck of the left femur. The 7/15/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. She had no behaviors and no episodes of wandering. The resident utilized a walker for ambulation. The Elopement Risk Evaluation, dated 7/14/24, indicated the resident was not at risk to elope at the time, placement on the elopement risk protocol was not indicated. The resident had no Care Plan related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all covered individuals (anyone who was an owner, operator, employee, manager, agent, or contractor of the facility) was notified annually of their obligation and requirement to comply with the reporting of reasonable suspicion of crimes against a resident, related to an allegation of sexual abuse for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) Finding includes: During an observation on 6/17/24 at 9:40 a.m., Resident B was observed in bed and awake. At that time, she was able to confirm she was going home soon and no longer need hemodialysis. During an interview at the time, the resident indicated that she did not remember any male nurse forcing her to take her medications or asking her for sexual favors. The resident indicated she remembered on one night, the room was very dark, and a male came into her room and that scared her. She did not know who he was, but the room was so dark, it had just startled her. The record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-17 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure continuity of care was provided after a resident was discharged home with orders for intravenous (IV) antibiotic medications and the care of a PICC (a peripherally inserted central catheter) line for continued treatment for a bone infection for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. (Resident C) Finding includes: The closed record for Resident C was reviewed on 6/17/24 at 2:05 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to home on 5/30/24. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis (bone infection) of the left ankle and foot, type 2 diabetes, abscess of the left lower limb, heart disease, acute kidney failure, high blood pressure, and obesity. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/14/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. A Nurses' Note, dated 5/7/24 at 6:40 p.m., indicated the resident was admitted to the facility from the hospital. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure palatable and attractive food was served for 1 of 2 meals observed and for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for food. (The breakfast meal, Residents 34 and 41) Findings include: 1. During the Resident Council interview on 4/16/24 at 1:57 p.m., 10 residents were in attendance. Over half of the residents in attendance indicated breakfast was not good that morning. They indicated the bacon looked raw and the eggs were discolored. One resident indicated her bacon was raw on one end and burnt on the other. Several of the residents indicated the fried eggs looked green and they didn't want to eat them. One resident stated, the eggs looked like the Dr. Seuss book [NAME] Eggs and Ham. Some of the residents also indicated the sausage patties served for the breakfast meal on 4/14/24 were hard like hockey pucks. During an interview on 4/16/24 at 2:30 p.m., the Administrator indicated the facility had a new Dietary Food Manager and the Resident Council concerns would be addressed. 2. During an interview on 4/14/24 at 9:41 a.m., Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare a pureed (blended smooth) diet designed to meet the needs of the residents. This had the potential to affect 10 of 10 residents who received a pureed diet. Finding includes: On 4/17/24 at 11:12 a.m., [NAME] 1 was observed preparing a pureed cabbage braised recipe. [NAME] 1 added 10 scoops of cabbage to the mixer and turned on the mix cycle. [NAME] 1 then added 2 cups of sauerkraut juice. The mixer was turned back on and stirred. The mixture was observed to be watery and [NAME] 1 added a tablespoon of thickener. The mixer was turned back on and then stirred to review consistency. [NAME] 1 then added another tablespoon of thickener and turned on the mixer. A total of 7 tablespoons of thickener were added to the recipe. Once the mixture was completed, the pureed meal was appropriate consistency and was free of lumps or chunks. During an interview on 4/17/24 at 11:25 a.m., [NAME] 1 indicated the cabbage was too watery and she had to add more thickener. During an interview on 4/17/24 at 11:29 a.m., [NAME] 1 indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served as scheduled for 2 of 2 meal observations. (The lunch meal) Findings include: 1. On 4/16/24 at 12:20 p.m., residents were observed seated at their tables in the main dining room. Staff started passing beverages to the residents at 12:35 p.m. and the first tray served to the residents was at 1:15 p.m. The residents were observed becoming impatient and wanting their food. On 4/17/24 at 1:01 p.m., a food cart was taken to the Memory Lane Unit from the kitchen. At 1:10 p.m., a second cart was sent to Memory Lane. At 1:11 p.m. on 4/17/24, the first tray in the main dining room was served. The posted meal times indicated Memory Lane was to be served lunch at 12:30 p.m. and the Main Dining Room at 1:00 p.m. During an interview on 4/18/24 at 10:00 a.m., the Administrator indicated the dietary staff was a contracted service for the facility and the meals should have been served on time. 2. During the Resident Council interview on 4/16/24 at 1:57 p.m., 10 residents were in attendance. The majority of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a self-medication administration assessment was completed for residents with medications at the bedside for 2 of 2 random observations. (Residents 105 and 2) Findings include: 1. On 4/15/24 at 9:34 a.m., Resident 105 was observed sitting on the side of her bed. There was a medication cup that contained a small amount of medication solution on top of the bedside table. The record for Resident 105 was reviewed on 4/15/24 at 2:15 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression, diabetes, traumatic amputation of left foot, hypertension (high blood pressure), and urinary tract infection. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/29/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. A Physicians' Order, dated 3/30/24, indicated to give 30 milliliters (ml) of ProT Gold (supplement) once a day. There was no self-medication administration assessment. There was no Physician order to self-administer medications. During an interview on 4/16/21 at 11:20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) assistance to dependant residents related to nail care and the removal of facial hair, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident 41) Finding includes: During an interview on 4/14/24 at 11:40 a.m., Resident 41 indicated his nails were long and dirty and someone usually came in to clean them, but they had not been done in awhile. At that time, the resident's nails were long with a dark colored substance underneath them. The resident was also unshaven. During random observations on 4/15/24 at 1:33 p.m. and on 4/16/24 at 9:00 a.m., the resident was observed in bed. At those times, the resident's nails were long and dirty and he was unshaven. The record for Resident 41 was reviewed on 4/15/24 at 2:40 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, senile degeneration, high blood pressure, hallucinations, anxiety, and pain. The 2/6/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making and needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure non-pressure skin treatments were completed as ordered and TED (compression support stockings) hose were in use for a resident with edema, for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. (Residents 64 and 122) Findings include: During a random observation on 4/14/24 at 1:30 p.m., Resident 64 was observed sitting in his wheelchair. At that time, the resident's lower legs were observed with dry scaly skin and were red in color. The resident indicated staff complete a treatment to them a couple times a week. The record for Resident 64 was reviewed on 4/15/24 at 2:12 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, heart failure, cellulitis, high blood pressure, and atrial fibrillation. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/4/24, indicated the resident was not cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident was at risk for pressure ulcers, but currently had none. The Care Plan, revised on 3/21/24, indicated the resident had cellulitis. Physician's Orders,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure ankle braces were applied as ordered for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM). (Resident 40) Finding includes: On 4/14/24 at 8:41 a.m., 11:45 a.m., and 2:11 p.m., Resident 40 was observed in his broda chair (a positioning wheelchair). The resident was wearing his shoes and no ankle braces were in use. On 4/15/24 at 1:26 p.m., the resident was again observed in his broda chair. The resident had shoes on and no ankle braces were in use. On 4/16/24 at 8:42 a.m., the resident was seated in his broda chair by the nurses' station. He was wearing shoes and no ankle braces were in use. The resident's right foot was leaning on the right side of the foot rest. At 1:15 p.m., the resident's right foot was again leaning on the right side of the foot rest on the broda chair. No ankle braces were in use. At 3:35 p.m., the resident's left foot was leaning on the left side of the foot rest. Again, no ankle braces were in use. On 4/17/24 at 1:17 p.m., the resident was seated in his broda chair by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident in the shower room which resulted in a fall, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 34) Finding includes: During an interview on 4/14/24 at 9:44 a.m., Resident 34 indicated she was left alone in the shower room, went to stand up to clean her buttocks, slipped and fell. She indicated the shower chair was not locked, that's why I fell. Staff assisted her into the shower room and they knew she was in there by herself. During an interview on 4/17/24 at 1:30 p.m., the resident was asked again about her fall in the shower room. At that time, she indicated she was helped into the shower room by staff and there were other CNAs in the room talking. One of the CNAs helped her wash her back, and then after she was finished, she did not hear any more talking and indicated she knew was left alone in there, so she continued to wash herself and stood up to wash behind her, went to sit back down and fell to the floor because the wheels on the shower chair were not locked. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure foley (urinary) catheter bags and tubing were kept off the floor, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for catheters. (Resident 53 ) Finding includes: On 4/14/24 at 10:58 a.m., Resident 53 was observed sitting in his wheelchair. The foley bag was resting on the ground underneath the resident's wheelchair. On 4/14/24 at 11:25 a.m., the resident was observed sitting in his wheelchair asleep. The foley bag was resting on the floor underneath his wheelchair. On 4/14/24 at 2:16 p.m., the resident was observed sitting in his wheelchair watching his tablet. The foley bag remained resting on the floor beneath his wheelchair. The record for Resident 53 was reviewed on 4/15/24 at 1:44 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy, high blood pressure, urine retention, acute kidney disease, and obstructive uropathy. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/17/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had a indwelling catheter. The resident was dependent with toileting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was set at the correct flow rate, for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents 228, 37 and 116) Findings include: 1. During random observations on 4/14/24 at 9:10 a.m. and 11:10 a.m., Resident 228 was observed wearing oxygen per nasal cannula. At those times, the flow rate on the room concentrator was set at 2 liters per minute. On 4/15/24 at 9:30 a.m., and 1:25 p.m., the resident was observed wearing oxygen per nasal cannula. At those times the oxygen was above the 2 liter mark but below the 2.5 liter mark. The record for Resident 228 was reviewed on 4/15/24 at 1:50 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, heart disease, high blood pressure, and shortness of breath. The 3/27/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and used oxygen while a resident. The Care Plan, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled with a date opened and not expired, related to a multi-dose insulin vial and insulin pens, for 2 of 3 medication carts observed. (Rainbow and Reflections medication carts) Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 10:34 a.m., a medication cart on the Rainbow unit was observed. At that time, there was 1 multi-dose vial of Novolog insulin with an open date of [DATE]. During an interview at that time, the Rainbow Unit Manager indicated it should have been discarded after 28 days. 2. On [DATE] at 10:46 a.m., a medication cart on the Reflections unit was observed. At that time, there was 1 Basaglar and 1 Lantus insulin kwikpens observed with no date opened. During an interview at that time, LPN 1 indicated both pens should have been labeled with a date opened. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:00 p.m., the Nurse Consultant indicated the pens were to be dated when opened and the Novolog multi-dose vial was expired. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide dental services to a resident requesting dentures, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dental care. (Resident 19) Finding includes: During an interview on 4/15/24 at 2:35 p.m., Resident 19 indicated his dentures needed to be tightened up. The resident's upper denture was observed to be loose and flapped when the resident spoke. The record for Resident 19 was reviewed on 4/15/24 at 2:58 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, high blood pressure, transient cerebral ischemic attack, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, and acute respiratory failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/22/24, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for decision making and had no oral problems. A Care Plan, updated 2/19/2024, indicated the resident had oral/dental problems. A Dental Visit Note, dated 1/19/23, indicated all the resident's teeth were loose, decayed and broken down. The plan was to extract all remaining teeth and have a complete upper and lower denture made. There were no follow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were complete and accurately documented related to sliding scale insulin administration, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 107) Finding includes: The record for Resident 107 was reviewed on 4/16/23 at 9:10 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild cognitive impairment. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/15/24, indicated the resident had short and long term memory problems and she was severely impaired for daily decision making. The resident had also received insulin during the assessment reference period. A Physician's Order, dated 3/21/24, indicated the resident was to receive Lispro Insulin (a short acting insulin) before meals and at bedtime based on the following sliding scale: 151 - 200 = 2 units 201 - 250 = 4 units 251 - 300 = 6 units 301 - 350 = 8 units 351 - 400 = 10 units If blood sugar was greater than 400, give 12 units and call the Physician. Notify the Physician if the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place as care planned for a resident with a history of falls, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 2/27/24 at 11:45 a.m., Resident B was observed seated in a wheelchair near the nurses' station. Her room was observed to have a standard mattress on the bed and there was no floor mat visible. On 2/27/24 at 3:00 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON) present, the resident was observed in her bed with her eyes closed. She was on a standard mattress and there was not a mat on the floor next to the bed. The resident's record was reviewed on 2/27/24 at 1:56 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's dementia, osteoporosis and a history of fall. The resident resided on the memory care unit. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/13/24, indicated the resident had severe cognitive deficits and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, toileting and transfers. The current Fall Care Plan indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status related to meal consumption records not completed for residents with weight loss for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident B) Finding includes: Resident B's record was reviewed on 1/8/23 at 9:06 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, multiple sclerosis, respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. The Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/11/23, indicated the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making. He required assistance with eating and received a mechanically altered diet. A shower sheet, dated 11/20/23, indicated the resident weighed 149.6 pounds. On 12/8/23, Resident B's weight was 143.3 pounds. A Care Plan, dated 12/2/23, indicated the resident was at nutritional risk related to varying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were managed appropriately related to medications not signed out as ordered for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents B and C). Findings include: 1. Resident B's record was reviewed on 1/8/23 at 9:06 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, multiple sclerosis, respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. The Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/11/23, indicated the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making. He received an antidepressant, anti-anxiety, and opioid medication. The November 2023 Physician Order Summary (POS), indicated the resident received the following medications: - Actos (diabetic medication) tablet 30 milligrams (mg) by mouth once daily - Diazepam (antidepressant medication) tablet 2 mg by mouth three times daily - Glimepiride (diabetic medication) tablet 1 mg by mouth once daily - Protonix (reduces amount of acid in the stomach) tablet delayed release 20 mg by mouth once daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure side effects for antipsychotic medications were monitored for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident J) Finding includes: The record for Resident J was reviewed on 9/26/23 at 1:58 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, asthma, respiratory failure, diabetes, and cirrhosis (liver failure). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/4/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. In the last 7 days, the resident received antipsychotic, anti-anxiety, and antidepressant medications 7 times. A Care Plan, dated on 8/14/23, indicated the resident used anti-anxiety medication, hypnotic medication and antidepressant medication. The approaches were to observe for side effects of each of the medications. A Physician's order, dated 7/29/23 and updated on 9/25/23, indicated Bupropion (an anti-depressant medication) 150 milligrams (mg) to be given by mouth one time a day for depression. A Physician's order, dated 7/29/23 and updated on 9/25/23, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure labs were completed as ordered and the Physician was notified of the results for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for lab services. (Residents G and D) Findings include: 1. Resident G's record was reviewed on 9/26/23 at 12:45 p.m. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy and hypertension. A Physician's Order, dated 9/22/23, indicated to obtain a CMP (complete metabolic panel), a CBC with diff (complete blood count with differential), folate, TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone), hemoglobin A1C (a lab to monitor blood sugar control) and a vitamin D level on 9/25/23. There was no documentation the lab draw had been completed on 9/25/23, why it had not been completed or if it was rescheduled. Interview with LPN 1 on 9/26/23 at 2:20 p.m., indicated labs had not been completed for the resident. At 2:30 p.m., the Nurse Consultant was notified of the above and asked to confirm if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) assistance to dependent residents related to incontinence care, nail care, changing urinary catheters, and dining assistance for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Residents 66, 74, 218, and E) Findings include: 1. On 1/18/23 at 2:09 p.m., Resident 66 was seated in a chair in the activity lounge. A urine odor was noted. When the resident stood from the chair, the back of her pants were wet and the area extended to mid thigh. The resident proceeded to the other activity room located across the hall. At 2:18 p.m., 2:45 p.m., and 3:10 p.m., the resident continued to go back and forth between the activity rooms. The resident remained in the wet pants. Multiple staff were in the activity rooms and the resident was not provided assistance to change her pants. The record for Resident 66 was reviewed on 1/20/23 at 9:53 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, psychosis, and delirium. The 10/29/22 Quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served to resident rooms was palatable for 1 of 1 units observed. This had the potential to affect the 19 residents who resided on that unit and received food from the kitchen. (Residents 44, 54 and Rainbow Unit) Findings include: 1. Interview with Resident 44, who resided on the Rainbow Unit, on 1/18/23 at 2:29 p.m., indicated she received her meals in her room. The food was not warm for a lot of the meals she had been served. A follow up interview with Resident 44 on 1/24/23 at 10:30 a.m., indicated the lunch that she had received the day before was cold. 2. Interview with Resident 54, who resided on the Rainbow Unit, on 1/19/23 at 10:12 a.m., indicated she sometimes would eat her meals in her room. The vegetables were often raw and the food overall was not served hot. On 1/23/23 at 12:23 p.m., the lunch trays were delivered to the Rainbow Unit in a food cart. The last tray was removed at 12:31 p.m. The tray had a plastic dome lid covering the plate. At that time, the Dietary Manager (DM)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary kitchen related to built up grease on the flat top, stove top, and sides of the oven in 1 of 1 kitchens observed (Main Kitchen). This had the potential to affect 116 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 1/18/23 at 9:18 a.m., with [NAME] 1, the following was observed: - The flat top, stove top, and sides of the oven had a build up of grease. 2. During the follow-up tour in the kitchen on 1/23/23 at 11:46 a.m., with the Dietary Manager the following was still observed: - The flat top, stove top, and sides of the oven had a build up of grease. Interview with the Dietary Manager at that time indicated the dietary staff was responsible for cleaning. There should not have been a build up of grease on the cooking appliances. 3.1-21(i)(3)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment, as well as the kitchen area, was clean and in good repair related to dirty floors, marred walls, marred doors, loose baseboards, lime build up on faucets, leaking faucets, slow draining sinks, burnt out light bulbs, dirty sinks, and dirty soap dispensers in 1 of 1 kitchen areas and on 3 of 3 units. (The Main Kitchen, Rainbow, Reflections, and Memory Lane Units) Findings include: 1. During the Environmental tour with the Director of Maintenance on 1/24/23 at 3:34 p.m., the following was observed: Rainbow Unit a. The over bed light fixture in room [ROOM NUMBER] for bed 1 had a burnt out light bulb. The bathroom faucet was leaking water around the knobs after being turned on. The wall behind the toilet was gouged and marred. The walls in the bathroom were marred. The corner wall by the closet was marred and a section of baseboard was missing. Two residents resided in the room and shared the bathroom. b. The faucet leaked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure edema was assessed and monitored and Physician's Orders were obtained for moisture associated skin damage (MASD - which is caused by prolonged exposure to various sources of moisture, including urine or stool.) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for edema and for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for skin conditions non-pressure related. (Residents D and E) Findings include: 1. The closed record for Resident D was reviewed on 1/23/23 at 2:37 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and left against medical advice on 8/24/22. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes, cancer of the cervix, anemia, edema, and sepsis. There was no Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment available for review. There was no Care Plan for the MASD. A Nurses' Note, dated 8/23/22 at 7:50 p.m., indicated the resident arrived at the facility at 7:15 p.m. There were multiple bruises noted to the lower abdomen, excoriation to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure follow up visits to an Ophthalmologist occurred for a resident needing cataract surgery for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for vision and hearing. (Resident 85) Finding includes: During an interview on 1/18/23 at 11:06 a.m., Resident 85 indicated he had a consult about cataract surgery but had not heard anything more about it. The record for Resident 85 was reviewed on 1/20/23 at 10:40 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes, chronic pain, high blood pressure, and anxiety. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/26/22, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Interview with Social Service (SS) Employee 1 on 1/23/23 at 4:10 p.m., indicated after 2020, they had trouble getting vision services for the residents, so they were sending residents out to local eye doctors. She did remember the resident going out to see the Optometrist and would look into it. A SS Note, dated 1/23/23 at 5:10 p.m., indicated the resident was seen by an Optometrist on 3/3/22. He was then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Physician's orders were in place for a wedge positioning device for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM). (Resident 62) Finding includes: On 1/20/23 at 9:44 a.m. and again at 11:15 a.m., Resident 62 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. The resident had a wedge device between both of her legs. A Velcro strap was attached to the device and around the resident's left leg. Another Velcro strap was attached to the device and around the resident's right leg but not strapped closed. On 1/20/23 at 1:27 p.m., Resident 62 was observed sitting in a wheelchair by the nurse's station. The resident had a wedge device between both of her legs with the Velcro straps around both legs and strapped. Record review for Resident 62 was completed on 1/20/23 at 1:04 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke and dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/2/22, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident required an extensive 2+ person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure acceptable parameters of nutrition were maintained related to completing food consumption documentation for residents with a history of weight loss for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents 34 and 74) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 34 was reviewed on 1/20/23 at 11:52 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus and dementia with behavior disturbance. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/23/22, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making and she needed extensive assistance with eating. The resident also received a mechanically altered, therapeutic diet. A Care Plan, dated 12/10/22, indicated the resident was at nutritional risk related to obesity, she required a therapeutic and mechanically altered diet, her meal intakes varied, and she had decreased ability to feed herself at meals. The resident had significant weight losses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to check placement for a peg tube prior to the administration of medication for 1 of 1 peg tubes observed during medication pass. (Resident 49) Finding includes: On 1/19/23 at 4:14 p.m., LPN 1 was observed preparing and pouring medications for Resident 49. All the medications were crushed separately and to be administered through the peg tube. He entered the resident's room, washed his hands with soap and water, and donned clean gloves. He placed the enteral feeding on hold and listened to the resident's bowel sounds by using a stethoscope. He proceeded to flush the peg tube and administer the medication one by one. He did not did not check for placement prior to administration. The record for Resident 49 was reviewed on 1/24/23 at 9:16 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, peg tube, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Physician's Orders, dated 8/22/22, indicated the resident was NPO (nothing by mouth). Jevity enteral feeding was to be infused at 64 cubic centimeters (cc) per hour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure narcotic pain medication was available for a resident who was newly admitted and experiencing severe pain for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pain. (Resident 224) Finding includes: During an interview with Resident 224 on 1/19/23 at 8:52 a.m., she indicated her pain medications were not available for 2 days after she was admitted . She wanted a pain pill yesterday evening and was told there were none available. During an interview on 1/19/23 at 3:30 p.m., the resident indicated the nurse told her only 3 pills were available and they were still waiting for the doctor to sign the pain prescription. During an interview on 1/20/23 at 9:35 a.m., the resident indicated her pain medication was not available in the middle of the night. She asked for a pain pill around 8:00 p.m. and received it, however nothing was available after that. Her pain level was currently a 9 out of 10. The record for Resident 224 was reviewed on 1/23/23 at 10:10 a.m. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to manage medications appropriately related to not signing out medications as ordered for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident C) Finding includes: The record for Resident C was reviewed on 1/23/23 at 9:45 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavior disturbance. The 12/31/22 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident had short and long term memory problems and was moderately impaired for daily decision making. The resident also had trouble sleeping during the last 7-11 days. A Physician's Order, dated 2/14/22, indicated the resident was to receive Aricept (a medication for dementia) 5 milligrams (mg) every evening and Namenda (a medication for dementia) 5 mg at bedtime. A Physician's Order, dated 2/20/22, indicated the resident was to receive Melatonin 5 mg at bedtime related to a sleep disorder. The September 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR), indicated the Aricept, Namenda, and Melatonin were not signed out as being given on 9/27/22.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of a significant medication error related to receiving the wrong medications for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident B) Finding includes: The record for Resident B was reviewed on 1/20/23 at 10:36 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavior disturbance, psychotic disorder, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/17/22, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During the assessment reference period, the resident had received injections, antipsychotic medications, anti-anxiety medications, antidepressant medications, and a diuretic (water pill). A Care Plan, reviewed on 10/17/22, indicated the resident was at risk for impaired cognition related to Schizophrenia, Mood Disorder, and Dementia. Interventions included, but were not limited to, Zyprexa (an antipsychotic medication) and Depakote (mood stabilizer) as ordered. A Change of Condition note, dated 8/26/22 at 9:18 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 54.0-2.0 vs chain
The other 22 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Bloomington Care CenterBloomington, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Elkhart Care CenterElkhart, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Golden Rule Care CenterRichmond, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville Care CenterMerrillville, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Richmond Care CenterRichmond, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Brandywine Care CenterGreenfield, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview Care CenterMishawaka, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Laporte Care CenterLa Porte, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Portage Care CenterPortage, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Twelfth Street Care CenterMishawaka, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Willow Springs Care CenterIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Brookview Care CenterIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Muncie Care CenterMuncie, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Woodbridge Care CenterEvansville, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare -Sycamore Village Care CenterKokomo, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Churchman Care CenterIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Lincoln Hills Care CenterTell City, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Petersburg Care CenterPetersburg, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Valparaiso Care CenterValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Woodlands Care CenterNewburgh, IN 5 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Brentwood Care CenterEvansville, IN 5 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Knox Care CenterKnox, IN

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SHEPPERD, TIFFANYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/02/2023
ENGELS, ERINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/25/2014
GENTRY, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/12/2022
STARKEY, TYLERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2020
WAITE, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2020
WHICKER, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/12/2022
FENOUGHTY, DEANNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/10/2023
FOUNTAINVIEW LAPORTE OPERATING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2012

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$821K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 8%Other / private 24%

This home reported $821K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$337per resident / day
operating cost
$10,255per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$386per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155136. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next