No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brickyard Healthcare - Laporte Care Center

1700 I Street, La Porte, IN 46350 · For profit - Corporation · 87 certified beds · (219) 362-6234 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (219) 362-6234 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited May 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited May 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
900 I St · (219) 324-1600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.6 mi
1302 W State Road 2 · (219) 362-7009 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI0.6 mi
1234 W State Road 2 · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Miller St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.3%11.0%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.6%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms28.7%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%3.9%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.5%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.6%23.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.4%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.7%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.3%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.3%22.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.8%10.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.031.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.051.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.2%CMS range 28.5–53.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 7.4–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.2%CMS range 6.3–16.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.87
RN hours/ resident / day
0.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.97
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
27.5%
Total nursing turnover
0.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 70.1 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-15)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was an appropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic medication (Seroquel) for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident B)Finding includes:The closed record for Resident B was reviewed on 5/12/26 at 1:17 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on 3/18/26. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to heart disease, respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, asthma, hypertensive kidney disease, chronic kidney disease, high blood pressure, heart failure, anxiety disorder, pulmonary embolism, opioid dependence, and dependence on renal dialysis.The 3/2/26 Modification of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and received an antipsychotic medication on a routine basis.A Care Plan, dated 2/28/26, indicated the resident was on antipsychotic therapy related to anxiety disorder. A History and Physical from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received incontinence care and was checked and/or changed at least every two hours for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). (Resident 30)Finding includes:During an interview on 5/12/26 at 9:30 a.m., Resident 30 indicated she had not been changed since 12:30 a.m. At that time, she consented for staff to check and/or change her. During an observation on 5/12/26 at 9:44 a.m., CNA 2 and CNA 3 entered the resident's room to provide incontinence care. CNA 2 indicated she had not checked or changed the resident since her shift started at 6:30 a.m. The CNA removed the bed linens and the resident was observed lying on a bed sheet and an incontinence pad and was wearing an incontinence brief. There was a large dried dark brown urine ring all the way around the incontinence pad. The bed sheets were wet all the way up the resident's back and the incontinence brief was saturated with urine. During an interview at that time, CNA 2 indicated they have a problem on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with constipation was treated for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for constipation and bruises and skin lesions were assessed and monitored for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. (Residents 30, 68 and 65)Findings include:1. During an interview on 5/12/26 at 9:30 a.m., Resident 30 indicated she was constipated all the time. During an observation on 5/12/26 at 9:44 a.m., CNA 2 and CNA 3 entered the resident's room to provide incontinence care. They removed the bed linens and rolled the resident onto her right side. The incontinent pad and bed sheets were wet with urine all the way up the resident's back. The incontinence brief was removed and saturated with urine. At that time, there was white bandage located on her upper left hip area. CNA 2 indicated the bandage was not covering the open area as it had moved and was wet with urine. The open area, which was located below the sacrum in the buttock crease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was using a smoking apron while smoking as care planned for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for smoking. (Resident 50)Finding includes: On 5/11/26 at 1:06 p.m., Resident 50 was observed outside in the smoking area. There were several other residents, the Activity Director and two other staff members present. The resident was not wearing a smoking apron. The Activity Director indicated the resident did not need a smoking apron. On 5/11/26 at 2:49 p.m., the resident was observed in his room seated in his chair. His wheelchair was in front of him and there were two burn holes in the cushion. The resident's record was reviewed on 5/13/26 at 10:15 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 3/16/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact.A Smoking and Safety assessment, dated 5/6/26, indicated the resident was lethargic and falls asleep easily during tasks or activities. He also had burned clothing, skin,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was on at the correct flow rate for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen. (Residents 5, 30, and 17)Findings include:1. During random observations on 5/11/26 at 12:06 p.m. and 2:25 p.m., on 5/12/26 at 9:43 a.m. and 2:59 p.m., and on 5/13/26 at 9:25 a.m., Resident 5 was observed in bed with a tracheostomy and was receiving oxygen by the way of a mask over the trach. He was connected to the oxygen concentrator in the room and the rate was set at four liters per minute. During an interview on 5/13/26 at 9:35 a.m., LPN 1 indicated the Respiratory Therapist (RT) told her it did not matter what the oxygen rate was set at as long as the humidity was at least at 28%. The record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 5/13/26 at 11:18 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, compression of the brain, tracheostomy, and high blood pressure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/8/26, indicated the resident was rarely understood/rarely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's fluid restriction was accurately documented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 68)Finding includes:During an interview on 5/12/26 at 9:21 a.m., Resident 68 indicated she was not on a fluid restriction and could drink whatever she wanted. She liked apple juice and received it for all three meals. She usually drank about 1.5 of the large white styrofoam cups of water every day. The record for Resident 68 was reviewed on 5/12/26 at 3:05 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease, end state renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/8/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and received dialysis while a resident.Nurse's Notes, dated 5/6/26 at 4:31 p.m., indicated the residenr received new orders from the dialysis physician to start LiquaCel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an opioid medication was administered and had an indication for use for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospice. The facility also failed to ensure a heart rate was monitored prior to the administration of blood pressure medication for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. (Residents 17 and 65)Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 17 was reviewed on 5/13/26 at 2:45 p.m. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, COPD, heart failure, heart disease, anxiety, and vascular dementia. The 2/20/26 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was not cognitively intact for daily decision making and received hospice while a resident. A Physician's Order, dated 1/28/26, indicated Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution 20 milligrams (mg)/5 milliliters (ml), give 0.25 ml by mouth every 1 hour as needed for pain rated 5-10 or shortness of breath. The 1/2026, 3/3026, and 4/2026 Medication Administration Records (MAR) indicated the Morphine was administered to the resident when his pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place and implemented related to staff failing to perform hand hygiene after glove removal during a pressure ulcer treatment for 1 of 2 pressure ulcer treatments observed. (Resident 1)Finding includes: During a pressure ulcer treatment observation on 5/15/26 at 8:00 a.m., the Unit Manger gathered supplies for Resident 1's pressure ulcer treatment. She performed hand hygiene, donned the appropriate personal protective equipment and placed the supplies on a clean towel on the over bed table. She had clean gloves to both hands and removed the resident's sock and old bandage. With the same gloves, she cleaned the pressure ulcer with wound cleaner and patted it dry. She removed her gloves and donned a clean pair of gloves to both hands. She did not perform hand hygiene after glove removal. She opened the package of collagen particles and with her gloved hands placed the particles on the open area. She then opened a tube of zinc oxide and squeezed an amount onto her gloved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all essential equipment was in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen. (Main Kitchen)Finding includes:During a tour of the Main Kitchen on 5/11/26 at 9:22 a.m., a large buildup of ice was observed in the walk-in freezer. There was ice on the fans, shelves, floor, and door frame. The food on the shelves had a thick layer of frost on it. At that time, the Kitchen Manager indicated the freezer had been building up with ice for a long time, and once a week, she would go in and try to scrape out all of the ice. She believed they were waiting to get a new freezer next year. During an interview on 5/12/26 at 1:58 p.m., the Maintenance Director indicated the freezer had been building up with ice for a long time. It had been looked at, but could not be repaired. It would probably be replaced next year. During an interview on 5/12/26 at 3:30 p.m., the Regional Nurse Consultant indicated she was aware of issues with freezer for months.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve food under sanitary conditions related to dirty food equipment, dirty floors and dirty PVC pipes under the dish machine for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. (The Main Kitchen) Findings include: During the brief Kitchen Sanitation Tour with the Dietary Food Manager on 3/31/25 at 9:38 a.m., the following was observed: a. There was a large amount of dried grease spillage on top of and on the sides of the deep fryer. The side of the stove next to the deep fryer was also dirty with dried grease. The side of the steamer was observed with dried grease as well as a large amount of food crumbs and dust under the steamer. b. The oven hood vents were dirty and greasy. c. The white PVC pipes under the dish machine were very dirty with a large accumulation of dried food spillage. The floor under the dish machine was dirty with adhered dirt against the wall. d. There were two rusted ceiling vents in the dish room. During an interview on 4/3/25 at 10:45 a.m., the Dietary Food Manager indicated all of the above was in need of cleaning.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed to self-administer medications and had physician's orders to self-administer for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Residents 44, 52, 20 and 8) Findings include: 1. On 4/1/25 at 9:44 a.m., 1:09 p.m. and 3:50 p.m., a bag of Mucinex throat lozenges was observed in a plastic bin on Resident 44's overbed table. On 4/2/25 at 1:50 p.m., the bag of throat lozenges remained on the resident's overbed table. The record for Resident 44 was reviewed on 4/3/25 at 2:05 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic respiratory failure. The 3/12/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The April 2025 Physician's Order Summary (POS) indicated the resident may self-administer her nebulizer treatment and oral medications once prepared by the licensed nurse/QMA. Medications may be left with me to self-administer as long as I am in the room. There…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity related to wearing a hospital gown during the day and not consistently offering pleasure food for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity. (Resident 17) Finding includes: During a random observation on 3/31/25 at 11:21 a.m., Resident 17 was observed in bed wearing a hospital gown. At that time, an enteral tube feeding was infusing into the peg tube (a tube inserted directly into the stomach for nutrition). The resident's roommate was seated in a chair in the room as well. At 11:25 a.m., the roommate received her lunch meal and proceeded to eat in the room. Resident 17 did not receive a tray and was not offered anything to eat. On 3/31/23 at 3:22 p.m., the resident was observed in bed still wearing a hospital gown. During an interview at that time, the resident indicated she did not receive anything to eat for lunch, and sometimes they would bring a pudding for me to eat. During random observations on 4/1/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to file a grievance form, thoroughly investigate, and resolve grievances related to a resident representative's complaints for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for grievances. (Resident B) Finding includes: The closed record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/3/25 at 10:43 a.m. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, diabetes, sacral (tailbone area) pressure ulcer, cancer of the large intestine, and dementia. The 1/29/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making, and required maximum assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living) and transfers. A Social Services Note, dated 3/3/25, indicated during a meeting with the SSD (Social Services Director), nursing, wound care, and the Administrator, the resident's representative had concerns about the resident's care and made multiple accusations. There was no documentation of the specific concerns, investigation or resolution. A grievance form was not initiated. A Social Services Note, dated 3/6/25, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for dependent residents related to shaving and washing hair for 3 of 8 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Residents 17, 37, and 63) Findings include: 1. During random observations on 3/31/25 at 11:21 a.m. and 3:22 p.m., Resident 17 was observed in bed wearing a hospital gown. At that time, she had a moderate amount of facial hair on her chin. During random observations on 4/1/25 at 8:58 a.m., 1:10 p.m. and 2:30 p.m., the resident was observed in bed wearing a hospital gown and had a moderate amount of facial hair on her chin. During random observations on 4/2/25 at 10:20 a.m., 11:26 a.m., 1:30 p.m. and 5:14 p.m., the resident was observed in bed wearing a hospital gown and had a moderate amount of facial hair on her chin. The record for Resident 17 was reviewed on 4/2/25 at 10:45 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with signs and symptoms of constipation was treated for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for constipation, and areas of discoloration, and edema were assessed and monitored for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions non-pressure related and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for edema. (Residents 63, 57, and 122) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 63 was reviewed on 4/2/25 at 11:45 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure, anxiety, heart disease, osteoarthritis, and heart failure. The 12/24/24 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was never/rarely understood and was severely impaired for decision making. The resident was dependent on staff for ADL care and was always incontinent of bowel. A Care Plan, revised on 1/19/25, indicated the resident was at risk for constipation related to decreased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's toenails were cut, kept trimmed and podiatry care was provided for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for foot care. (Resident 63) Finding includes: During random observations on 3/31/25 at 11:25 a.m. and 4/1/25 at 8:59 a.m., Resident 63 was sitting up in a Broda chair. On 4/2/25 at 10:20 a.m., 11:30 a.m., and 5:20 p.m., the resident was observed reclined in a Broda chair. At those times, the resident was observed with very long toenails. On 4/3/25 at 9:32 a.m., QMA 1 and the Wound Nurse were in the room. At that time, they were both shown the resident's long toenails. During an interview on 4/3/25 at 9:55 a.m., the Wound Nurse indicated the resident received hospice care, so they would have to let hospice know the toenails needed to be trimmed. The record for Resident 63 was reviewed on 4/2/25 at 11:45 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure assistive devices were in place for a resident with a limited range of motion for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for positioning. (Resident 50) Finding includes: During random observations on 3/31/25 at 11:34 a.m. and 12:15 p.m., and on 4/1/125 at 11:32 a.m. and 1:12 p.m., Resident 50 was observed sitting in her wheelchair. At that time, her right arm was elevated on a small bed pillow. There was no arm tray observed on the wheelchair. The record for Resident 50 was reviewed on 4/1/125 at 2:10 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, stroke, right side hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis of one side of the body), vascular dementia, anxiety, high blood pressure, and osteoarthritis. The 2/10/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was not cognitively intact for daily decision making and had a limited range of motion impairment to one side for the upper extremity. A Care Plan, dated 12/13/24, indicated the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with a history of falls had preventions in place to prevent more falls/injuries related to a floor mat beside the bed and keeping the bed in the lowest position for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Residents 37 and 63) Findings include: 1. During random observations on 4/1/25 at 9:00 a.m. and 2:30 p.m., and on 4/2/25 at 3:00 p.m., Resident 37 was observed in bed. At those times, the resident's bed was not in the lowest position. The record for Resident 37 was reviewed on 4/1/25 at 2:50 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, high blood pressure, delusions, osteoarthritis, depression, and acute kidney failure. The 3/3/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was not alert and oriented and was dependent on staff transfers and bed mobility. The resident had no falls since the last assessment. A Care Plan, revised on 9/20/24, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food consumption logs were completed for residents with a history of weight loss for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents 14, 39, and 52) Findings include: 1. On 3/31/25 at 11:54 a.m., Resident 14 was seated in her room in her wheelchair. The resident was served noodles, meatballs, peas, and a fruit cup. The resident indicated she wanted nothing to eat. On 4/2/25 at 11:38 a.m., the resident was served grilled cheese and soup for lunch. She was not eating any of her meal. At 11:55 a.m., the resident was observed drinking her milk but not eating any food. The record for Resident 14 was reviewed on 4/1/25 at 1:12 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, mild cognitive impairment, adult failure to thrive, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/13/25, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had sustained a weight loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the head of the bed was elevated to at least 45 degrees while a resident's enteral feeding was infusing into the peg tube (a tube inserted directly into the stomach for nutrition) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding. (Resident 17) Finding includes: During a random observation on 4/2/25 at 5:14 p.m., Resident 17 was observed lying completely flat in bed. The head of the bed was flat and not elevated to at least 45 degrees. At that time, the resident had an enteral tube feeding infusing at 55 cubic centimeters (cc) per hour. CNA 2 and RN 1 were immediately notified and asked to reposition the resident in bed. During an interview at that time, CNA 2 and RN 2 both indicated the resident played with the remote control and would lower the head of the bed all the time by herself. RN 1 indicated she had administered her medication at 4:10 p.m., and the head of the bed was elevated at that time. The record for Resident 17 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess and document a resident's pain in accordance with their care plan for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain management. (Resident 20) Finding includes: During an observation on 3/31/25 at 10:36 a.m., Resident 20 winced in pain when moving in bed. He indicated he had pain in his shoulder and hip daily rating 5-8 out of 10. He indicated all the facility was doing for his pain was giving him Tylenol and he did not know why. The resident's record was reviewed on 4/1/25 at 3:30 p.m. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, amputation of the left leg, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen levels). The 2/5/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily incision making, required partial assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living) and was independent with transfers. A Physician's Order, dated 12/22/24, indicated Biofreeze External Gel 4 % (a topical pain medication) to the left hip every 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dialysis access site was assessed and monitored as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 39) Finding includes: The record for Resident 39 was reviewed on 4/2/25 at 9:57 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, congestive heart failure, and dependence on renal dialysis. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/4/25, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making and he was receiving dialysis. A Care Plan, dated 12/12/24 and reviewed on 2/14/25, indicated the resident had an alteration in kidney function evidenced by hemodialysis for end stage renal disease (ESRD). Interventions included, but were not limited to, monitor, document, and report as needed (PRN) signs and symptoms of infection to access site: redness, swelling, warmth or drainage. A Physician's Order, dated 5/31/24 and listed as current on the April 2025 Physician's Order Summary (POS), indicated the resident's arteriovenous (AV) fistula (a dialysis access site) to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not used for an excessive duration and an excessive dose for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for antibiotics and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents 44 and 63) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 44 was reviewed on 4/3/25 at 2:05 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, ESBL (extended-spectrum beta-lactamase), neurogenic bladder, sepsis, and urinary tract infection (UTI). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/12/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. She was dependent with toileting hygiene, always incontinent of bladder, and had received an antibiotic during the last 7 days. A Care Plan, dated 10/17/24 and reviewed on 3/26/25, indicated the resident was on antibiotic therapy related to a history of frequent UTI's. A Physician's Order, dated 10/15/24 and listed as current on the April 2025 Physician's Order Summary (POS), indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored correctly for 1 of 7 residents observed during medication administration and 1 of 4 residents reviewed for self-administration of medications. (Residents 23 and 20) Findings include: 1. On 4/2/25 at 4:32 p.m., LPN 1 was observed preparing medications for Resident 23. When the LPN entered the resident's room, a medication cup containing two pills was left on top of the medication cart as well as a Tamsulosin (a medication used to relax the muscles of the bladder and prostate) tablet which was in it's original package. Upon entering the room, the LPN closed the door and the medication cart was out of her view. During an interview on 4/3/25 at 2:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing indicated the pills should not have been left on top of the medication cart. The current facility Medication Storage policy was provided by the Director of Nursing on 4/4/25 at 9:45 a.m. The policy indicated all drugs and biologicals would be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place and implemented related to not donning personal protective equipment (PPE) for residents in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and not cleaning multi-use equipment during wound care for 1 of 1 resident with a tube feeding and for 1 of 1 resident with a pressure ulcer. (Residents 17 and 63 ) Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 4/2/25 at 5:14 p.m., Resident 17 was observed lying completely flat in bed. The head of the bed was flat and not elevated to at least 45 degrees. At that time, the resident had an enteral tube feeding infusing at 55 cubic centimeters (cc) per hour. CNA 2 and RN 1 were immediately notified and asked to reposition the resident in bed. CNA 2 and RN 1 both donned clean gloves to both hands and proceeded to reposition the resident in bed. The RN turned the tube feeding off and lifted up the resident's gown and disconnected the tube. At that time, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and stored under sanitary conditions related to a greasy deep fryer, improper labeling of food, and dried spillage in refrigerators in 1 of 1 kitchens and 2 of 3 pantries throughout the facility. (The Main Kitchen, A and C wing pantries) Findings includes: 1. During the Brief Kitchen Sanitation Tour on 5/8/24 at 9:12 a.m. with the Dietary Food Manager, (DFM) the following was observed: a. The deep fryer was noted with many food crumbs and was greasy on both sides, with the grease extending to the side of the convection oven. During an interview at that time, the DFM indicated the deep fryer was cleaned weekly. 2. During an observation of the A-Wing pantry refrigerator on 5/9/24 at 9:10 a.m., there was a heavy accumulation of dried pink, orange, and red beverage spillage. The refrigerator housed the resident's food and other beverages. During an interview at that time, LPN 3 had no comment regarding the spillage. 3. During an observation of the C-Wing pantry refrigerator on 5/14/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program related to incomplete documentation of the infection control program, incomplete mapping of infections and lack of glove use during insulin administration during a medication pass for 1 of 8 residents observed during medication pass. (Resident 51 and LPN 1) Findings include: 1. The Infection Control Program was reviewed on 5/9/24 at 9:00 a.m. The January, February, March and April 2024 Infection Surveillance Data Collection Forms included the following: - resident's name and room number - infection type - infection onset date - antibiotic name - antibiotic start and stop date - comments The Infection Control Logs lacked any documentation of diagnostic lab or x-ray results or if criteria for a true infection were met. Five residents in March and ten residents in April lacked documentation of signs or symptoms associated with the infection. During an interview on 5/9/24 at 9:30 a.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), she indicated she did not include the infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) received necessary services related to having the ability to reach the call light when ADL care was needed, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accommodation of needs. (Resident 32) Finding includes: During an interview on 5/8/24 at 10:12 a.m., Resident 32 indicated he had waited over 30 minutes to get help off the stool and he could not reach the call light to get help. On 5/8/24 at 10:20 a.m., Resident 32 was observed having attempted to reach for the call light from his wheel chair, but the call light was not within reach. The resident smelled of feces and had attempted to get help from staff. On 5/8/24 at 10:28 a.m., the resident was observed with the Director of Nursing (DON). The resident was seated in his wheelchair and had attempted to reach the call light. The DON witnessed his attempt and realized the call light was not within reach. She then moved the resident's bed several inches, which allowed the resident to pass through the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from misappropriation of medication related to a staff nurse using a resident's insulin pen for her personal use, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for misappropriation of medication. (Resident 25) The deficient practice was corrected by 10/31/23, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. The facility thoroughly investigated the misappropriation of medication, notified the police, placed the nurse on suspension while the investigation took place, the resident's insulin pen was removed from the medication cart and discarded, a new insulin pen was reordered for the resident to use, the facility provided inservices to the entire staff regarding the misappropriation of medication, and completed random observations on all shifts to ensure compliance of the policy was implemented correctly. The random observations were completed 5 times a week for 4 weeks, weekly for 4 weeks, and then weekly for 4 months. LPN 4 was guilty of misappropriation of medication and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) assistance to dependent residents related to nail care and the removal of facial hair, for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Residents 23, 45, and 11) Findings include: 1. During random observations on 5/8/24 at 10:01 a.m. and 1:17 p.m., on 5/9/24 at 9:25 a.m., 11:55 a.m., and 1:08 p.m., and on 5/10/24 at 12:20 p.m., Resident 23 was observed in bed. At those times, the resident was unshaven. The record for Resident 23 was reviewed on 5/9/24 at 2:35 p.m., Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behaviors, high blood pressure, heart disease, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. The 2/13/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was not cognitively intact for daily decision making and needed substantial/maximal assist with personal hygiene. A Care Plan, revised on 1/18/24, indicated the resident had a physical functioning /self care deficit related to weakness, impaired mobility, and impaired cognition. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an assessment was completed and devices were in place for a resident with limited range of motion for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for range of motion. (Resident 45) Finding includes: During random observations on 5/8/24 at 9:27 a.m. and 1:10 p.m., on 5/9/24 at 9:28 a.m., 11:55 a.m., and 1:06 p.m., and on 5/10/24 at 12:30 p.m., Resident 45 was observed sitting in a wheelchair. At those times, the resident was observed with her left hand clenched and lying against her chest. On 5/13/24 at 11:00 a.m., the Director of nursing assessed the resident's left hand and indicated with passive range of motion, the ring finger could be straightened out, however, the middle finger would only extend up to 75 degrees. She indicated at the time, Occupational Therapy would be completing an assessment of the hand. The record for Resident 45 was reviewed on 5/13/24 9:53 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's dementia, high blood pressure, depression , psychotic disorder, and traumatic subdural…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meal consumption was monitored for a resident with a history of weight loss and/or were at nutritional risk for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 51) Finding includes: The record for Resident 51 was reviewed on 5/9/24 at 11:00 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pneumonia, diabetes, anemia, acute pancreatitis, and anxiety. The 2/26/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making, had no oral problems and weighed 222 pounds with no significant weight loss. The resident needed setup or clean up assistance with eating. A Care Plan, dated 2/24/24, indicated the resident was at nutritional risk related to obesity, diabetes, and anemia. The approaches were to observe meal intakes. The resident weighed 204 pounds on 2/20/24 and 206 pounds on 3/6/24. A weight obtained on 4/12/24 indicated the resident weighed 189 pounds, which was an 8.25% weight loss in 30 days. Physician's Orders on the current 5/2024 Physician Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a newly hired CNA was certified past 120 days of employment for 1 of 44 employees reviewed for licensure and certification. (Employee 1) Finding includes: Review of the employee records was completed on 5/14/24 at 10:02 a.m. Employee 1 was hired on 1/10/24. Employee 1's 120th day of employment was on 5/8/24. The employee's time card was reviewed and indicated she had worked on the following days as a CNA after her 120 days of employment without certification: 5/9/24, 5/13/24, and 5/14/24. During an interview on 5/14/24 at 10:47 a.m., the Payroll Coordinator indicated she was unaware they had only 120 days to work, she thought it was 120 shifts. Employee 1 was working the floor as a CNA today on 5/14/24. 3.1-14(e)

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were accurately documented related to weekly skin assessments and nutritional supplements for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for skin conditions and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents 16 and 51) Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 5/8/24 at 9:36 a.m., Resident 16 was observed with many bloody and dried scabs all over his upper body including his arms and trunk. The record for Resident 16 was reviewed on 5/10/24 at 12:42 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pulmonary disease and fibrosis, type 1 diabetes, major depressive disorder, high blood pressure, heart disease, anxiety, and stroke. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/1/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and did receive applications of ointment other than the feet. The Care Plan, revised on 3/25/24, indicated the resident had altered skin integrity, non-pressure related to a rash to bilateral upper and lower extremities including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 22 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Bloomington Care CenterBloomington, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Elkhart Care CenterElkhart, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Golden Rule Care CenterRichmond, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville Care CenterMerrillville, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Richmond Care CenterRichmond, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Brandywine Care CenterGreenfield, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview Care CenterMishawaka, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Portage Care CenterPortage, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Terrace Care CenterLa Porte, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Twelfth Street Care CenterMishawaka, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Willow Springs Care CenterIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Brookview Care CenterIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Muncie Care CenterMuncie, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Woodbridge Care CenterEvansville, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare -Sycamore Village Care CenterKokomo, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Churchman Care CenterIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Lincoln Hills Care CenterTell City, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Petersburg Care CenterPetersburg, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Valparaiso Care CenterValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Woodlands Care CenterNewburgh, IN 5 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Brentwood Care CenterEvansville, IN 5 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Knox Care CenterKnox, IN

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FLACKE, JOSEPHIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/13/2018
GENTRY, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/12/2022
WHICKER, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/12/2022
ENGELS, ERINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/25/2014
FENOUGHTY, DEANNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/10/2023
STARKEY, TYLERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2020
WAITE, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2020
LAPORTE OPERATING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2012

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$395K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 6%Other / private 16%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $395K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$341per resident / day
operating cost
$10,363per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$364per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155062. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next