Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville Care Center
8800 Virginia Place, Merrillville, IN 46410 · For profit - Corporation · 164 certified beds · (219) 736-1310 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.1% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.1% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 20.7% | 25.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 3.9% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.6% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.1% | 23.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.9% | 95.4% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.9% | 3.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.7% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.0% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.3% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.4% | 79.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.3% | 22.2% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.1% | 10.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.52 | 1.61 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.00 | 1.44 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
33.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 58.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 33.3%CMS range 23.4–44.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 8.0–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 58.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 4.0–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 164 beds and averages 151.9 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-01-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired resident's rights to be free from physical abuse for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents B and C). This deficient practice resulted in Resident B sustaining swelling with discoloration injuries to the bilateral eyes and left wrist, a laceration on the right toe, and a laceration on the right ankle that required six sutures to repair. Finding includes: A Facility-Reported Incident (FRI), dated 12/29/24, indicated the following: .Incident date: 12/29/24 Incident time: 9:30 a.m. Description added -12/29/24 Nurse observed [Resident B] with blood on the foot part of the bed, with an open area noted to right ankle, 2 cm [centimeters] X 0.3 cm, right toe with open area 0.9 cm X 0.3 cm, right eye swollen, left eye discoloration noted, and swelling to left wrist noted upon full assessment. When asked [Resident B], BIM [Brief Interview of Mental Status] 5 [cognitively impaired] was asked what happened he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for 1 of 3 residents observed during medication pass. Two errors were observed during 25 opportunities for errors during medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of 8%. (Resident G)Finding includes:During a morning Medication Pass Observation on 2/24/26 at 9:21 a.m., RN 1 indicated Resident G's glucometer reading was 285 and Lantus insulin 46 units and Novolog insulin six units were to be administered. She removed two insulin pens from the cart and dialed in 46 units on the Lantus pen and six units on the Novolog pen without priming the insulin pens. She then entered the resident's room and was stopped. She indicated she was unsure about priming the insulin pens and was unsure of the correct way to prime the insulin pens. The Clinical Education Nurse, at the time of the observation, instructed RN 1 to prime both pens with two units of insulin, then to dial in the correct dosage. The insulin was then administered to the resident.Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a clean and homelike environment related to dirty bed linens on made beds for 4 of 7 resident beds observed on the Advanced Alzheimer's Care Unit (AACU). (Residents E, H, F, and G)Finding includes:During observations of the bed linen, on the AACU on 1/15/26 at 9:42 a.m. through 9:50 a.m., with the AACU Supervisor the following was observed:Resident E's bed had been made with a bottom sheet, top sheet and blanket. There was a moderate amount of a brown substance located on the top sheet that was hanging over the side of the bed. The AACU Supervisor acknowledged the brown substance. CNA 1 entered the room and indicated the night shift had made the resident's bed.Resident H's bed had been made with a bottom sheet sheet, top sheet and bed cover. The top sheet and cover were removed and there were brown stains on the bottom sheet.Resident F's bed had been made with a bottom sheet, top sheet and bed cover. The top sheet and cover were removed and there were food crumbs in the bed on the bottom…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary kitchen was maintained related to testing of the chemical dishwasher. This had the potential to affect all residents who received meals prepared in the Main Kitchen. Finding includes:On 8/4/25 at 9:00 a.m., the Initial Kitchen tour was completed with the Dietary Service Manager (DSM). The DSM indicated the dishwasher was a chemical system. He indicated the dishwashing solution was tested every shift. He obtained a test strip from a bottle on top of the dishwasher. The test strip was weaved into the tines of a fork and placed on a tray that was put through the dishwasher. When completed, the DSM removed the test strip and indicated it read 50 parts per million (ppm), he indicated it should be 150 ppm. He then indicated they were the incorrect strips. He retrieved the correct strips and again wove the strip into the tines of a fork and ran it through the dishwasher. When the cycle was complete, the strip had washed away. He attempted again and the strip again washed away. He then took a strip…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was clean and in good repair related to discolored ceiling tiles, dirty ceiling vents, broken window curtains, peeling wallpaper around window sill, gouges in walls, and marred floors for 3 of 3 units. (Reflections, C-wing, and D-wing) Findings include:During the Environmental Tour on 8/7/25 at 3:21 p.m., with the Regional Maintenance Director and the Housekeeping Manager, the following was observed: 1. C-wing a. There were several ceiling tiles that were discolored and stained. b. The ceiling vents were dirty throughout the unit. c. The window curtain fasteners were broken in room [ROOM NUMBER]. There were two resident's residing in the room. d. In the lounge/common area, the window sills had peeling wallpaper underneath them. e. There were two large gouges in the wall across from the nurses' station. 2. D-wing a. The flooring in room [ROOM NUMBER] was marred and had black scuff marks throughout the room. There were two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were attempted prior to administering a PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for mood/behavior. (Resident 114)Finding includes:The record for Resident 114 was reviewed on 8/6/25 at 3:03 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, psychotic disorder with delusions, and anxiety disorder. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/16/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A Care Plan, updated on 11/8/24, indicated the resident used psychotropic medications related to psychotic disorder, depression, and anxiety.A Physician's Order, dated 7/10/25, indicated lorazepam (Ativan, an anti-anxiety medication) 1 mg (milligram), every 8 hours as needed for anxiety. A Physician's Order, dated 7/7/25, indicated hydroxyzine pamoate (an antihistamine medication also used to treat anxiety) 25 mg every 8 hours as needed for anxiety.The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 7/2025, indicated the lorazepam was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed and in place for a resident receiving an anti-anxiety medication for 1 of 33 residents reviewed for care plan development. (Resident 11)Finding includes:Resident 11's record was reviewed on 8/6/25 at 10:17 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of the right femur, rheumatoid arthritis and generalized anxiety disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/27/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was dependent for toileting, bed mobility and transfer assistance. The resident received anti-anxiety medications. A Nurse Practitioner Note, dated 7/30/25, indicated the resident's medications included chlordiazepoxide 5 milligram (mg) capsules, every 8 hours as needed for anxiety for 14 days. The current Physician Order Summary indicated clonazepam 5 mg every 12 hours for anxiety. There was no care plan related to anti-anxiety medication use. On 8/7/25, the Director of Nursing provided care plans related to a mood problem, psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received the activities of daily living (ADL) assistance required related to dirty, uncut fingernails for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident 144)Finding includes: On 8/4/25 at 10:21 a.m., Resident 144 was observed lying in his bed. He indicated he wasn't getting his scheduled showers and they hadn't cleaned his fingernails. He held up his hands and there was dark debris observed under his fingernails. On 8/8/25 at 1:32 p.m., the resident was again observed in his bed. He indicated he had received a bath, but they sill had not cleaned or cut his fingernails. His fingernails were slightly long and there was dark debris under his fingernails. The resident's record was reviewed on 8/8/25 at 1:08 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure and osteoarthritis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/15/25, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required substantial assistance for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter collection bag and tubing for a resident with a history of infection was kept off the floor for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 91)Finding includes:On 8/4/25 at 11:40 a.m., Resident 91 was observed lying in bed. The resident's urinary catheter bag was resting on the floor next to the bed.On 8/6/25 at 3:06 p.m., Resident 91 was observed lying in bed. The resident's urinary catheter bag and tubing were resting on the floor next to the bed.Record review for Resident 91 was completed on 8/6/25 at 3:02 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, neurogenic bladder, and hypertension.The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/23/25, indicated the resident was dependent on staff with bed mobility and transfers. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. A Care Plan, dated 5/17/24, indicated the resident was incontinent of bowel and had an indwelling catheter present. An intervention included to keep the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and treatment related to oxygen administration for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 2)Finding includes: On 8/4/25 at 2:26 p.m., Resident 2 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in his room. He had a portable oxygen tank attached to the back of the wheelchair. The oxygen was on via a nasal cannula and set at 4 liters.On 8/6/25 at 10:43 a.m., Resident 2 was observed propelling himself down the hallway. He had a portable oxygen tank attached to the back of his wheelchair. The oxygen was on via a nasal cannula and set at 2 liters. Record review for Resident 2 was completed on 8/6/25 at 10:53 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and respiratory failure.The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/18/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident had impairment on both sides of his upper and lower extremities for a functional limitation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a narcotic pain medication was obtained and administered as ordered and PRN (as needed) medications were accurately recorded as dispensed on the Medication Administration Record for 1 of 5 closed records reviewed. (Resident 152)Finding includes: During an interview on 8/5/25 at 3:12 p.m., a family member indicated the resident had stage 4 lung cancer and had pain issues. She indicated all the medications the resident had received were prn (as needed), and the resident had difficulty asking for them. She was concerned he was having pain during his stay. The closed record for Resident 152 was reviewed on 8/8/25 at 1:50 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, malignant neoplasm of the left bronchus and Hodgkin's lymphoma. The resident was on hospice services. A General Note dated 7/31/25, indicated the resident had arrived at the facility. He was alert and oriented with some confusion noted. The resident was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for 1 of 8 residents observed during medication administration. Two medication errors were observed during 27 opportunities for error in medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of 7.41%. (Resident 41) Finding includes: On 8/6/25 at 9:15 a.m., RN 1 was observed preparing Resident 41's medications. She placed aspirin 81 milligram (mg) enteric coated tablet, Certavite/multivitamin tablet, clopidogrel 75 mg tablet, escitalopram 5 mg tablet, levetiracetam 500 mg tablet, lisinopril 20 mg tablet, and metoprolol succinate extended-release 25 mg tablet into medication bags and crushed the medications. She then administered the crushed medications mixed with applesauce. Resident 41's record was reviewed at 9:20 a.m. The current August 2025 Physician's Order Summary indicated aspirin 81 mg chewable tablet once daily and metoprolol succinate extended release 25 mg once daily. During an interview on 8/6/25 at 10:58 a.m., RN 1 indicated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were in place and implemented, related to incorrect use of alcohol wipes during insulin administration for 1 of 1 resident observed for insulin administration and lack of physician's orders for contact isolation for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for transmission based precautions. (Residents 42, 39, and 14) Findings include: 1. During a medication pass observation on 8/5/25 at 11:06 a.m., RN 3 was observed preparing to administer an insulin injection for Resident 42. She performed hand hygiene and donned clean gloves. She opened the container holding the insulin lispro 100 unit/milliliter vial and wiped the top with an alcohol wipe. She used the same alcohol wipe and cleaned an area on the resident's abdomen to prepare the area for a subcutaneous injection. She then removed 24 units from the insulin lispro vial with a syringe and injected the medication into the resident's abdomen. During an interview on 8/5/25 at 11:36 a.m., RN 3 indicated she used the same alcohol swab for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review & interview, the facility failed to implement a complete discharge planning process and ensure that the discharge needs of each resident were identified and met related to lack of ongoing Physician follow up for an abnormal wound culture result, indicating an infection, prior to discharge from the facility, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions. (Resident B) The deficient practice was corrected by 7/31/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. The facility investigated the delay in treatment following the receipt of abnormal wound culture results, completed audits for all wound cultures in the last 90 days, educated all nursing staff on the policy for wound culture tracking and notifications, and implemented a Laboratory Tracking Log. Finding includes: Resident B's closed record was reviewed on 8/1/24 at 10:57 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, motor vehicle injury, fracture of upper end of left humerus, fracture of medial condyle of left femur, fracture of left side rib, and insomnia. The admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were managed appropriately related to medications not signed out and given as ordered for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents B and G) Findings include: 1. Resident B's closed record was reviewed on 8/1/24 at 10:57 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, motor vehicle injury, fracture of upper end of left humerus, fracture of medial condyle of left femur, fracture of left side rib, and insomnia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/9/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. There was an impairment to the upper and lower left extremities. He required substantial assistance for hygiene and transfers. A Physician's Order, dated 7/3/24 at 9:00 p.m., indicated Xanax (an anti-anxiety medication) extended release 1 milligram oral tablet once daily. The July 2024 Medication Administration Record indicated Xanax was not marked as administered from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve food under sanitary conditions related to dirty and greasy food equipment, an accumulation of dust on fan blades, food spillage, lack of hair restraints, touching food with gloved hands after touching other items, and the dishwasher gauge not functioning for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. (The Main Kitchen). This had the potential to affect 137 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: 1. During the Kitchen Sanitation Tour on 6/10/24 at 9:10 a.m. with the Dietary Food Manager (DFM), the following was observed: a. A bag of noodles, located in the dry storage room, was not fastened. Loose noodles were observed on the shelves and on top of food boxes. b. The upper shelf located on the oven had an accumulation of crumbs and dust. c. There was an accumulation of dust and dried food spillage on the front of the convection oven. d. A large orange fan, located on a shelf in the dish room, had an accumulation of dust on the fan blades and fan cover. The fan was in use at that time and blowing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment was maintained related to an accumulation of dust and debris on floors, piping, and fan blades, as well as loose and detached base boards for 1 of 1 kitchen areas. (The Main Kitchen) Findings include: During the Kitchen Sanitation Tour on 6/10/24 at 9:10 a.m. with the Dietary Food Manager (DFM), the following was observed: a. The wall located behind the convection oven and the oven had an accumulation of dust and debris along the base of the wall. The white pipes located behind the convection oven and oven had an accumulation of dried food spillage. b. The ceiling vent located in between the steam table and the exit door to the kitchen had an accumulation of dust. c. A fan, anchored to the wall in the dish room, had an accumulation of dust on the fan blades and fan cover. The fan was not in use at the time. d. The base board located underneath the eye wash sink in the dish room was loose in some sections and pulled away from the wall. During an interview at that time, the DFM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received help with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) related to build up on teeth for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Resident 54) Finding includes: On 6/10/24 at 10:38 a.m., Resident 54 was observed sitting in bed. The resident's mouth was dry and crusty. His teeth were noted to be discolored and had build up on them. On 6/11/24 at 2:39 p.m., Resident 54 was observed sitting in bed. His mouth was dry and crusty when he opened it. His teeth were discolored and had build up on them. On 6/13/24 at 3:59 p.m., Resident 54 was observed in bed. His mouth was dry and crusty. His teeth were discolored and had build up on them. Resident 54's record was reviewed on 6/11/24 at 3:50 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction and chronic respiratory failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/19/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. He was dependent on staff for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, and personal hygiene. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with impaired vision received the necessary services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for vision. (Resident 70) Finding includes: During an interview on 6/10/24 at 2:49 p.m., Resident 70 indicated he needed to get his cataracts checked. He had an appointment set up over a year ago, but it was canceled. Resident 70's record was reviewed on 6/12/24 at 8:56 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hyperlipidemia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 3/13/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. His vision was listed as adequate with no corrective lenses. A Progress Note, dated 1/27/23, indicated the resident had received a referral for a cataract evaluation from the optometrist. The appointment was scheduled for 2/7/23. A Progress Note, dated 2/3/23, indicated the resident wanted to cancel his scheduled eye appointment due to the cold weather and would like to reschedule when the weather was warmer. A Progress Note, dated 2/6/23, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was transferred with a Hoyer lift (a full body mechanical lift) as indicated on the Resident Care Sheet for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents. (Resident 113) Finding includes: On 6/11/24 at 8:55 a.m., CNA 2 was observed attempting to transfer Resident 113 from her bed into her wheelchair. The resident was on her bed in a semi-seated position, her left arm was contracted and she had a splint on her right hand. Resident 113 was unable to sit upright on the side of bed by herself and was falling backward. The CNA was leaning forward in front of her, instructing Resident 113 to hold on to her neck as CNA 2 was attempting to hold the resident around her waist. The resident was unable to hold onto the CNA with her right arm only. Her legs were stretched forward and her feet were not securely on the floor. After several minutes, CNA 3 entered the room and indicated to CNA 2 that the resident could not be transferred like that, she needed a sit to stand lift (a device that assists…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure gastrostomy tube (peg tube) care was completed as ordered related to incorrect enteral feeding administration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for peg tubes. (Resident 54) Finding includes: On 6/10/24 at 10:38 a.m., Resident 54 was observed in bed. He had a tube feeding pump connected to Jevity 1.5 cal (type of feeding) infusing at 70 milliliters per hour (ml/hour) On 6/11/24 at 2:39 p.m., Resident 54 was observed in bed. He had a tube feeding pump connected to Jevity 1.5 cal infusing at 70 ml/hour. Resident 54's record was reviewed on 6/11/24 at 3:50 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction and chronic respiratory failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/19/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. He was dependent on staff for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, and personal hygiene. A Care Plan, dated 7/27/23, indicated the resident was dependent on tube feedings. Interventions included, but were not limited to, elevate head of bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received proper care and treatment related to oxygen administration flow rate for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen. (Resident 13) Finding includes: On 6/11/24 at 2:33 p.m., Resident 13 was observed in bed. He had a nasal cannula in his nares and the oxygen concentrator was set to a flow rate 4.5 liters per minute (lpm). On 6/13/24 at 8:57 a.m., Resident 13 was observed in bed. He had a nasal cannula in his nares and the oxygen concentrator was set to a flow rate 4.5 lpm. Resident 13's record was reviewed on 6/11/24 at 2:21 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure, chronic bronchitis, and adult failure to thrive. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/8/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living including, eating, hygiene, and bathing. The June 2024 Physician's Order Summary indicated oxygen at 3 liters per minute per nasal cannula if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a follow up for a pain specialist's medication order was completed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain. (Resident 128) Finding includes: During an interview on 6/10/24 at 11:43 a.m., Resident 128's daughter indicated she had taken the resident to see a pain specialist in April. The resident had a history of spinal fusion surgery and would sometimes have pain when doing activities of daily living (ADLs) and therapy. She was aware the resident would not get back to her prior level of function and was worried about her being in pain. The specialist had ordered Tramadol (an opioid pain medication) as needed (PRN). The daughter had taken the prescription to a pharmacy, had the medication filled, brought the medication to the facility, and had given it to the resident's nurse. She had recently found out the resident had never received the Tramadol medication and she was not told why. She had asked the D Wing Unit Manager about it and was told there was no order for the medication and the pain assessment showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update physician's orders after a medication regimen review was conducted for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 68) Finding includes: Resident 68's record was reviewed on 6/12/24 at 11:38 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 4/22/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and received dialysis treatments. A Pharmacy Medication Regimen Review, dated 4/23/24, indicated a recommendation was made to reduce polypharmacy. Current orders included pantoprazole (decreases stomach acid) 40 milligrams (mg) every morning, melatonin (a sleep aid) 8 mg every night, hydroxyzine (antihistamine used to reduce itching) 25 mg every night and Zyrtec (treats allergy symptoms) 10 mg daily. The Physician/Prescriber response indicated to change hydroxyzine 25 milligrams by mouth to nightly as needed. The June 2024 Physician's Order Summary indicated hydroxyzine 25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being, related to a medication scheduled during the resident's routine dialysis time and blood sugars levels and insulin administration not documented, for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents 28 and 74) Findings include: 1. During an interview with Resident 28 on 6/11/24 at 8:54 a.m., he indicated he attended dialysis three times a week on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. Tuesdays and Thursdays he was picked up around 9:30 a.m. and returned around 3:00 p.m. On Saturdays, he was picked up earlier, around 6 a.m. Resident 28's record was reviewed on 6/12/24 at 2:23 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Diabetes Mellitus, dependence on renal dialysis and cerebral infarction. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/24/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was dependent for bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a treatment for a pressure ulcer was administered as ordered and failed to thoroughly assess a resident's pressure ulcers upon admission into the facility, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents D and B) Findings include: 1) During an observation on 3/4/24 from 9:53 a.m. to 11:19 a.m., the Nurse Practitioner (NP) Wound Specialist was completing the weekly assessments of Resident D's pressure ulcers. Nurse 1 and CNA's 1 and 2 assisted with the assessments. CNA 1 and CNA 2 positioned the resident on the right side and supported the resident to prevent rolling from the bed. Nurse 1 removed the transparent dressing and wound vacuum tubing over the left hip pressure area and the NP measured and assessed the the area. After the wounds were all assessed and measured, Nurse 1 attempted to change the wound vacuum dressing on the left hip. The left hip area was cleaned, then the Nurse placed the cut foam into the wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were implemented, related to hand hygiene with resident care and glove removal, changes of contaminated gloves, cleaning of reusable equipment, and contamination of gauze during an observation of wound care. (Resident D and Nurse 1) Finding includes: During an observation of wound care for Resident D on 3/4/24 from 9:53 a.m. to 11:19 a.m., Nurse 1 donned gloves. The wound dressing was removed from the right heel by Nurse 1 with a gloved hand. There was serosanguinous drainage on the dressing and slough on the right heel. Nurse 1 then reached for the bottle of spray wound wash, with the same gloved hands. He sprayed the wound wash on a gauze pad and patted the wound to cleanse. He then reached into the bag of gauze pads and obtained more pads with the same gloves he used to remove the dressing and clean the wound. He sprayed more wound wash from the bottle on the gauze, and continued to cleanse the wound. He then used his gloved hand to push his hair behind his ear. He then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing for pressure ulcers, related to follow up with pressure ulcer treatment recommendations, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident F) Finding includes: On 1/31/24 at 3:36 p.m., Resident F was observed lying in bed. The resident's pressure ulcers were observed with the Director of Nursing (DON) and 2 other staff. There was a dark maroon discoloration to her left heel, and a dark colored scabbed area to her right hip. No treatments were in place or completed to the areas at this time. The DON indicated the area to the right hip was hard like a scab. Record review for Resident F was completed on 1/31/24 at 12:00 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, heart failure, and hypertension. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Progress Note, dated 1/23/24 at 8:13 p.m., indicated the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly prevent and/or contain COVID-19 related to the use of personal protective equipment in an isolation room. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 1/31/24 at 11:55 a.m., CNA 1 arrived to Resident B's door with her lunch tray. The resident's door indicated Droplet/Contact Isolation. Proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): an isolation gown, protective eye wear, an N95 face mask, and gloves to both hands before entering. There was a PPE bin located right outside the door. The CNA set the tray down onto the PPE bin, and then proceeded to put on an N95 mask and a gown. The CNA then entered the resident's room with her room tray, and had not put on eye protection or gloves. Upon observation of the PPE bin, there was not any eye protection stored inside it. On 1/31/24 at 12:03 p.m., CNA 1 was observed sitting in a chair next to Residents B's bed. She was feeding the resident. The CNA had on a gown and an N95 mask. She was not wearing eye protection or gloves. The CNA indicated the resident had COVID-19. She indicated staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were in place and implemented related to respiratory masks uncovered when not in use and not cleaning a shared use blood pressure cuff and pulse oximeter between residents. (Residents 102, 46, 296 and 298) Findings include: 1. On 8/7/23 at 1:55 p.m., Resident 102 was observed in bed. There was a nebulizer (machine used to deliver breathing treatments) and a BiPap (bilevel positive airway pressure, a type of ventilator used to help breathing) on the table next to the bed. The BiPap mask was on the floor, uncovered. The nebulizer mask was resting on the nebulizer uncovered. On 8/10/23 at 8:36 a.m., and 8/11/23 at 8:08 a.m., the nebulizer mask was observed on the table uncovered. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 8/7/20 at 2:20 p.m., indicated when nebulizer and BiPap masks were not in use, they should be in plastic bags unless the nebulizer mask was drying from being cleaned, then it would be on a paper towel until dried. The policy, Nebulizer Therapy, was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was provided with ADL (activities of daily living) care related to long, dirty fingernails for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident 98) Finding includes: On 8/8/23 at 9:49 a.m., Resident 98 was observed laying in bed. His fingernails were long and had dark debris under them. He indicated they needed to be cut. On 8/11/23 at 8:10 a.m., the resident was observed in bed, his fingernails were long and had dark debris under them. He indicated they had not been cut yet. The record for Resident 98 was reviewed on 8/9/23 at 8:49 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cerebral infarction. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6/8/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive 1+ assist for hygiene, bed mobility and transfers. Interview with the Director of Nursing, on 8/11/23 at 8:15 a.m., indicated ADL care included bathing, hair care, nail care and overall appearance. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care related to oxygen administration flow rate for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 102) Finding includes: On 8/7/23 at 1:55 p.m., Resident 102 was observed in bed. Her oxygen nasal cannula was on and connected to the oxygen concentrator, but the concentrator was turned off. She indicated she was not feeling well and that was probably why. RN 1 was notified. The RN entered the room and turned the concentrator on to 3 liters per minute (lpm), she offered the resident a breathing treatment, then exited the room. The resident's record was reviewed on 8/7/23. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6/23/23, indicated the resident used oxygen and was cognitively intact. A Physician's Order, dated 6/1/23, indicated the resident was to receive oxygen at 4 lpm. On 8/7/23 at 2:15 p.m., the RN was asked to check the setting on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being related to a blood pressure medication administered outside of parameters for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 98) Finding includes: The record for Resident 98 was reviewed on 8/9/23 at 8:49 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypotension (low blood pressure). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6/8/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive 1+ assist for bed mobility and transfers. The current Physician's Order indicated to give Midodrine (a medication used to raise blood pressure), 10 milligrams, three times daily. Hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure (top number in blood pressure, BP) was greater than 130. Review of the July and August 2023 Medication Administration Records indicated the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications, related to a lack of non-pharmacological interventions attempted before the administration of antipsychotic medication and a PRN (as needed) antipsychotic order in place longer than 14 days for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 30) Finding includes: The record for Resident 30 was reviewed on 8/10/23 at 2:07 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. A Physician's Order, dated 6/25/23, indicated Zyprexa (olanzapine, an antipsychotic medication) 2.5 mg (milligrams) every 12 hours PRN (as needed) for anxiety. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 8/2023, indicated the resident received the Zyprexa medication on the following days: 8/2/23, 8/3/23, 8/4/23, and 8/7/23. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 7/2023, indicated the resident received the Zyprexa medication on the following days: 7/1/23, 7/2/23, 7/3/23, 7/5/23, 7/7/23, 7/9/23, 7/10/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Physician was notified of a abnormal laboratory test result for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 98) Finding includes: The record for Resident 98 was reviewed on 8/9/23 at 8:49 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cerebral infarction. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6/8/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive 1+ assist for bed mobility and transfers. A Pharmacy Recommendation, dated 1/10/23, indicated the resident was taking theophylline (medication for asthma symptoms), this medication had a narrow therapeutic range and it was recommended to obtain a theophylline level at least every six months. The Physician agreed. A Physician's Order, dated 2/17/23, indicated to obtain a theophylline level every six months. The lab result was not located in the resident's record. On 8/10/23, the Director of Nursing provided a copy of the lab result dated 2/20/23. The result was 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received routine and/ or emergency dental services related to a delay in scheduling a procedure to have teeth extracted for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dental services. (Resident 34) Finding includes: On 8/7/23 at 10:20 a.m., Resident 34 was observed in her room. She had several missing teeth. She indicated her teeth were in bad condition and needed to be pulled so she could get dentures, but the facility hadn't scheduled that appointment yet. She had seen the dentist who comes to the facility, but they were unable to extract teeth. The resident's record was reviewed on 8/10/23 at 8:39 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure and chronic respiratory failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 5/17/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive 1+ assistance for bed mobility and transfers. She had likely cavities or broken teeth. A Dental Note, dated 5/22/23, indicated the resident had many decayed and broken down…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 22 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CARPENTER-HEARD, JACQUELINE | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 12/17/2018 |
| ENGELS, ERIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/25/2014 |
| GENTRY, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/12/2022 |
| STARKEY, TYLER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/25/2014 |
| WAITE, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 08/01/2020 |
| WHICKER, TIMOTHY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/12/2022 |
| FENOUGHTY, DEANNA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/10/2023 |
| MERRILLVILLE OPERATING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2012 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $826K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155362. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.