Brickyard Healthcare - Portage Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 141 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 186 beds and averages 161.0 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments of a resident's vascular wound were timely and accurate for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds. (Resident H) The facility also failed to ensure Physician's Orders were followed related to insulin administration and blood sugar monitoring, for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for insulin administration and blood sugars. (Residents H, F, and J)Findings include:1. Resident H's closed record was reviewed on 6/25/26 at 11:13 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, severe peripheral arterial occlusive disease with right common iliac artery and right common femoral artery occlusions (major blood vessels supplying the right leg), diabetes mellitus, and dementia.A Care Plan, dated 5/22/26, indicated a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The interventions included, the body would be assessed for breaks in the skin and treated promptly as ordered by a Physician, diabetes medication would be administered and blood sugars would be obtained as ordered by the Physician.A Care Plan, dated 5/22/26, indicated a risk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary kitchen related to the dishwasher not reaching the required temperature for a high temperature dish machine. This had the potential to affect 149 residents who received meals from the Main Kitchen. Finding includes: The initial kitchen tour was completed on 1/5/26 at 9:09 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM indicated the dishwasher was a high temperature dish machine. Dietary Server 1 was observed putting trays of dishes through the dishwasher. A wash cycle was observed with Dietary Server 1. There were three gauges on top of the dishwasher. During the wash cycle, the wash temperature gauge and the rinse temperature gauge did not move from 150 degrees F (Fahrenheit). The final rinse sanitation gauge did not move from 130 degrees F. The DM asked the Dietary Server to run a few more cycles. Each time the gauges did not move. The DM then put a digital thermometer on a tray and ran it through a cycle. The reading on the thermometer was 153.6 F.During an interview at the time of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure medications and insulin were held according to parameters for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility also failed to ensure TED hose (compression stockings) were applied as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for TED hose and areas of bruising were assessed and monitored for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. (Residents 10, 64, 75, 126, 17, 4, and 114)Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 10 was reviewed on 1/8/26 at 11:32 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension and congestive heart failure The Quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/2/25, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. A Physician's Order, dated 11/26/25, indicated the resident was to receive Norvasc (a blood pressure medication) 5 milligrams (mg) in the morning. Hold if the resident's systolic (top number) blood pressure was less than 120 or pulse less than 60. The November 2025 Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented related to clarification of oxygen orders and incorrect documentation of obtaining blood pressure readings on a restricted arm for 4 of 34 records reviewed. (Residents 112, 161, 92, and 2)Findings include:1. On 1/6/26 at 11:00 a.m., Resident 112 was seated in her wheelchair in her room. She had no oxygen in use. On 1/7/26 at 9:33 a.m. and 2:00 p.m., the resident was observed in her room. She was not wearing oxygen per a nasal cannula at the time. On 1/8/26 at 2:05 p.m., the resident was seated in her wheelchair and being transported back to her room. A portable oxygen tank was hanging from the back of the wheelchair. The resident was not wearing oxygen at the time. The record for Resident 112 was reviewed on 1/7/26 at 2:38 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/13/25, indicated the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's dignity was maintained related to wearing a hospital gown while in bed during the day for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity. (Resident 75)Finding includes:On 1/5/26 at 11:21 a.m., Resident 75 was observed in her room in bed. The resident was wearing a hospital gown. On 1/6/26 at 9:35 a.m. and 11:38 a.m., the resident was observed in her room in bed and wearing a hospital gown. On 1/7/26 at 9:15 a.m., 11:37 a.m., and 1:40 p.m., the resident was observed in her room in bed wearing a hospital gown. On 1/8/26 at 10:42 a.m. and 1:55 p.m., the resident was observed in her room in bed wearing a hospital gown. The record for Resident 75 was reviewed on 1/7/25 at 10:35 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke and dementia without behavior disturbance. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/26/25, indicated the resident had short and long term memory problems and was severely impaired for daily decision making. It was important for the resident to choose what…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure referrals from the optometrist were carried out and appointments were made for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hearing and vision. (Resident 9)Finding includes:During an interview on 1/5/26 at 2:28 p.m., Resident 9 indicated he had seen the eye doctor a couple of times this year and was still waiting for his glasses and possibly eye surgery. The record for Resident 9 was reviewed on 1/9/26 at 10:32 a.m. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, end stage renal disease, heart failure, stroke, major depressive disorder, vascular dementia, anxiety, and renal dialysis. The 11/4/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and his vision was adequate with no corrective lens. There was no care plan for vision. An Eye Exam Visit Note by the optometrist, dated 7/12/25, indicated the resident had a mild cataract in his left eye and it was recommended to have YAG laser posterior capsulotomy (an outpatient procedure to address scar tissue that forms behind an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred properly in a mechanical lift and a floor mat was in place for a resident with a history of falls for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for accidents. (Residents B and C)Findings include:1. The record for Resident B was reviewed on 1/7/26 at 10:12 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia without behaviors, high blood pressure, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and osteoarthritis. The 12/18/25 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making and was dependent on staff for transfers from the bed to the chair. A Care Plan, revised on 6/16/25, indicated the resident had an activities of daily living (ADL) deficit. The approaches were to provide assistance with transfers and the resident required a mechanical lift. The 12/2025 Physician Order Summary indicated the resident received Hospice Services. A Change of Condition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure bolus tube feeding administration as well as gastrostomy tube (a tube inserted directly into the stomach for nutrition) site care was completed as ordered for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding. (Residents 75 and 13)Findings include:1. The record for Resident 75 was reviewed on 1/7/25 at 10:35 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and dementia without behavior disturbance. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/26/25, indicated the resident had short and long term memory problems and was severely impaired for daily decision making. The resident was also receiving a tube feeding (a tube inserted directly into the stomach for nutrition). A Care Plan, reviewed on 12/9/25, indicated the resident required a tube feeding related to the diagnosis of dysphagia. The resident was NPO (nothing by mouth) status. A Physician's Order, dated 7/31/25, indicated bolus feedings (a method of delivering liquid nutrition through a feeding tube as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document PICC line (a long-term use IV line) measurements as ordered for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with a PICC line. (Resident 161)Finding includes:The record for Resident 161 was reviewed on 1/7/26 at 10:47 a.m Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, colostomy, and intestinal obstruction.The admission Skilled Evaluation, dated 12/22/25, indicated the resident was alert and oriented and had a PICC line (a long-term use IV line).A Physician's Order, dated 12/23/25, indicated to measure the PICC catheter length on admission and with each dressing change thereafter, every Sunday night. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the PICC line dressing was changed on 12/24/25, 12/28/24, 12/31/24, and 1/4/26. The record lacked measurements of the PICC catheter length.A Care Plan, dated 12/23/25, indicated the resident was at risk for infection related to having a PICC line. Interventions included dressing change as ordered with measurements of the length of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was flowing at the correct rate per minute for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen. (Resident 14)Finding includes:During random observations on 1/5 at 10:46 a.m., 11:36 a.m., and 2:13 p.m., on 1/6 at 9:50 a.m., on 1/7 at 9:14 a.m. and 11:00 a.m., and on 1/8/26 at 7:56 a.m., Resident 14 was observed in bed. At those times he was wearing oxygen at 1.5 liters per nasal cannula on the room concentrator. On 1/8/26 at 2:25 p.m. RN 1 entered the resident's room and observed the oxygen at 1.5 liters. The RN indicated, she was unaware what his oxygen was to be set at. The record for Resident 14 was reviewed on 1/6/26 at 4:03 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD, paranoid schizophrenia, intellectual disabilities, asthma, psychotic disorder, and high blood pressure. The 12/5/26 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and wore oxygen while at the facility. The Care Plan, revised on 10/23/25, indicated the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $857K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN