Brickyard Healthcare - Muncie Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 46% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 93.5 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a staff member for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident B). Using the reasonable person concept, it is likely these deficient practices would lead to chronic or recurrent fear and anxiety. Findings include: During the initial tour of the AACU (Advanced Alzheimer's Care Unit) accompanied by LPN 27, on 8/2/23 at 9:45 a.m., Resident B was observed lying in her bed. LPN 27 indicated Resident B liked to take morning naps and wandered the unit in the afternoon. During an interview with LPN 27, on 8/2/23 at 11:28 a.m., she indicated Resident B was not aggressive but did have a tongue on her. It was typical to find her in someone else's room. On 8/2/23 at 2:13 p.m., Resident B was observed ambulating independently in the hallway. On 8/3/23 at 11:01 a.m., Resident B was observed sitting in a dining room chair at a table, with another resident across the table from her.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2023-08-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report to the Administrator or designee allegations of abuse for 1 of 3 allegations of abuse reviewed (CNA 6 to Resident D). This failure to report the allegation immediately resulted in CNA 6's abuse of a cognitively impaired resident later in the day. Findings include: During an interview with LPN 19, on 8/2/23 at 4:39 p.m., she indicated CNA 7 had reported to her Resident D was grabbed roughly by CNA 6 during her shower on 7/29/23. LPN 19 was in the process of handling other things and was passing medication at the time CNA 7 reported this to her (between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m.). She did not report the allegation to the Administrator or their designee. An Incident Submission email confirmed an incident report was submitted to the Indiana Department of Health on 8/3/23 at 2:51 p.m. The actual or identified date and time of the incident was 7/31/23 at 1:39 p.m. The report indicated the following: The description added, on 8/3/23, indicated during another investigation, CNA 7 reported that Resident D alleged CNA 6 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse by failing to provide supervision to ensure a cognitively impaired resident who wandered (Resident B) was free from resident-to-resident physical abuse by a resident known to be aggressive towards others (Resident C) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. The deficient practice was corrected on 1/26/26, prior to the start of survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: Review of an Incident Report sent to the Indiana Department of Health indicated the following:On 1/18/26 at 6:53 p.m., Resident B and Resident C were in the dining room, following mealtime. Staff were assisting other residents to their rooms when they were alerted by yelling coming from the dining room. Resident B was on the ground and Resident C was kicking him. Resident C had a laceration to the lip and hematoma to the right side of the forehead. Action Taken, added 1/18/26, indicated both residents were immediately separated, the nurse called 911, and a head-to-toe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the designated resident health care representative signed medical consent forms for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for health care representation. (Resident 256) Finding includes: Resident 256's clinical record was reviewed on 4/30/25 at 10:59 a.m. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and other cirrhosis of the liver. The admission date was 4/25/25. A 5/20/24 court document titled, Order Appointing Health Care Representative, indicated Resident 256 had been declared legally incompetent and appointed a legal health care representative. The health care representative was not related to Resident 256 and had full authority to make health care decisions. A 4/25/25 alert note indicated Resident 256's daughter told staff she was not the resident's health care representative. A voice mail message was left for the legal health care representative. A 4/26/25 mental health consent form was signed by Resident 256's daughter. A 4/26/25 psychotropic medications informed consent form was signed by Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of elevated blood pressures for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 39) Finding includes: Resident 39's record was reviewed on 4/29/25 at 2:21 p.m. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of frontal lobe, malignant neoplasm of parietal lobe, and essential (primary) hypertension. Current physician orders included, Aldactone (blood pressure medication) tablet 50 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth one time a day, hydrochlorothiazide (blood pressure medication) 50 mg tablet by mouth in the morning, amlodipine besylate (blood pressure medication) 10 mg tablet give one tablet by mouth one time a day, and clonidine (blood pressure medication) 0.3 mg tablet give one tablet by mouth two times a day. An alert note dated 1/25/25 at 9:27 a.m. indicated the resident was admitted to the hospital for a stroke. Review of blood pressure readings from 4/1/25 through 5/1/25 indicated the following: 4/1/25 8:47 p.m. 200/90 mmHg (millimeters of mercury), 4/2/25 7:53 p.m. 200/101 mmHg, 4/9/25 8:48…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide notifications of hospitalization to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident 60) Finding includes: During an interview with Resident 60 on 4/28/25 at 1:44 p.m., he indicated he was hospitalized last month with pneumonia. Resident 60's record was reviewed on 5/1/25 at 11:19 a.m. Diagnoses included heart failure, end stage renal disease (kidney failure), dependence on renal dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and pneumonia. A progress note dated 3/12/25 at 10:18 p.m. indicated the resident was sent to the hospital by ambulance. A nurse's note dated 3/18/25 at 10:32 p.m. indicated the resident returned to the facility via ambulance at 6:00 p.m. During an interview with the SSD on 5/1/25 at 3:52 p.m., she indicated Ombudsman notifications for transfers and discharges had not been sent out for March 2025 and were usually sent within the first week of the next month. She was in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed hold policies were provided to the resident and/or responsible parties at the time of the hospital transfer for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents 48 and 60) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 4/28/25 at 2:57 p.m., Resident 48 indicated she was hospitalized a couple months ago for about a week and did not receive any paperwork regarding a bed hold. Resident 48's record was reviewed on 4/29/25 at 2:37 p.m. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), centrilobular emphysema, asthma, and pneumonia. A progress note, dated 1/26/25 at 4:38 p.m., indicated the resident was sent to the hospital for difficulty breathing. A progress note, dated 1/31/25 at 6:40 p.m. indicated the resident returned from the hospital. The clinical record lacked indication of bed hold notification or policy was provided to the resident or representative. 2. During an interview with Resident 60 on 4/28/25 at 1:44 p.m., he indicated he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide catheter care in a manner to reduce the risk of contamination for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for catheter services (Resident 46). Findings include: During an observation on 5/2/25 at 2:08 p.m., CNA 14 performed ABHR (alcohol based hang rub) prior to entry the resident's room. A PPE (personal protective equipment) cart was located just inside the door. CNA 14 donned gloves but no gown. She bent down and emptied resident 46's catheter bag into a plastic graduated cylinder. She emptied the cylinder in the toilet, then removed her gloves and donned a new set, which she pulled from the pocket of her scrubs. No hand hygiene was performed. She then filled two plastic buckets with soap and water, placed washcloths into them and placed the buckets on the resident's bed. The CNA then assisted the resident to stand at his walker, placing her gloved hands on his left arm and shirt, as well as the walker, resulting in contaminated gloves. Using her contaminated gloved hands, she pulled down his pants, removed his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow Registered Dietician recommendations and notify the physician for a resident experiencing significant weight loss for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 42) Finding includes: Resident 42's clinical record was reviewed on 4/30/25 at 2:58 p.m. Diagnoses included essential hypertension, morbid severe obesity due to excess calories, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. An overweight/obesity care plan, initiated on 8/5/21, indicated the resident received a carbohydrate controlled regular textured diet, experienced 5.7 percent (%) weight loss in 30 days, and weight loss in 180 days. Interventions included the following: Diet as ordered (8/5/21) and monitor meal intakes (8/5/21). A current care plan, initiated on 12/28/24, indicated the resident had behaviors and would refuse to be weighed. A current order, initiated 2/28/25, indicated a regular texture consistent carbohydrate diet. Resident 42's meal consumption, for the last 30 days was reviewed and indicated the resident typically ate 76-100 % of her meals,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to check placement and prevent contamination during site care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for feeding tubes. (Resident 36) Finding includes: Resident 36's clinical record was reviewed on 4/30/25 at 8:27 a.m. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke), oropharyngeal phase dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. Current orders included check placement of tube prior to medication administration, flush feeding tube with 80 milliliters (ml) of water every shift, and place a split drain sponge with antibiotic ointment for feeding tube maintenance every shift. A 2/13/25, annual, Minimum Data Set assessment indicated Resident 36 had severe cognitive impairment. The resident required moderate assistance with eating. He was dependent on staff for assistance with all other activities of daily living. Nutritional approaches included a mechanically altered diet and a feeding tube. A discontinued care plan, resolved on 4/2/25, indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding oxygen flow rate and humidity for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen. (Resident 48) Finding includes: Random observations of Resident 48 indicated the following: During an observation on 4/28/25 at 2:57 p.m., Resident 48 was in her bed asleep with oxygen on via nasal cannula at five liters per minute. The humidity bottle attached to the oxygen concentrator was empty and dated 4/24. During an interview with the resident, she indicated she wore oxygen continuous at four liters per minute. She was unable to get out of bed and did not adjust the oxygen flow rate. On 4/29/25 at 9:00 a.m., the resident was asleep in bed with the oxygen on via nasal cannula at five liters per minute. The humidity bottle attached to the oxygen concentrator was empty and dated 4/24. Resident 48's clinical record was reviewed on 4/29/25 at 2:37 p.m. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen), chronic respiratory failure with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized interventions for dementia services to reduce or eliminate the need for psychoactive medications for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for dementia care. (Resident 29) Findings include: Resident 29's clinical record was reviewed on 4/29/25 at 2:56 p.m. Current diagnoses included dementia with agitation, diabetes mellitus, insomnia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and delusional disorder. Current physician's orders included the following psychoactive medications: Risperdal 0.5 mg (an anti-psychotic medication) - one tablet- two times daily for delusional disorder (4/29/25), buspirone HCL 10 mg (an anti-anxiety medication)- one tablet-three times daily for anxiety (3/3/25), Klonopin 0.5 mg (an anti-anxiety medication)- one tablet daily at bedtime (3/5/25), Zoloft 125 mg (an anti-depressant medication)- one tablet daily for depression (10/25/2024), and Remeron 7.5 mg (an anti-depressant used as an appetite stimulant). A 3/20/25, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $692K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN