No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brickyard Healthcare - Woodbridge Care Center

816 N First Ave, Evansville, IN 47710 · For profit - Corporation · 67 certified beds · (812) 426-2841 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (812) 426-2841 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 20241 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2024
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
520 Mary St #520 · (812) 424-8231 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
801 N 1st Ave · (812) 467-0109 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
900 W Columbia St · (812) 422-0700 · Call to confirm hours
Park
321 N Fulton Ave · (812) 435-6141 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.3%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.8%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.1%25.2%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.1%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.0%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.3%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%3.6%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.4%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table36.3%13.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.6%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine50.0%79.0%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.2–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.54
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.04
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.07
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.86
RN hoursweekends
64.9%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 51.0 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.50 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.39 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.76 to 0.86 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-25)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-15)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-10-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat a urinary tract infection (UTI) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for infections. Resident F resident's lab results weren't reviewed, follow up appointments with specialists weren't scheduled, and treatment related to the UTI found were not done in a timely manner which resulted in a hospitalization from 9/22/23 to 9/30/23. Resident C had a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) that was not diagnosed, the resident was then hospitalized that resulted in a necessary surgery being postponed. (Resident F and Resident C) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 10/11/23 at 11:24 A.M., Resident F was observed sleeping in bed. On 10/10/23 at 12:39 P.M., Resident F's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, renal insufficiency and neurogenic bladder. Resident F's most recent Quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/19/23 indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required an extensive assist of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed and implemented for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for catheters and activities. Fall interventions were observed out place, catheter interventions were observed out of place, and a resident did not have an activities care plan. (Resident 5 and Resident 3)Findings include:1. On 7/23/25 at 10:36 A.M., Resident 5's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and dementia. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 6/27/25, indicated Resident 5 had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff (staff does all of the work) for transfers, and had no falls since the prior assessment. A care plan conference was completed 7/23/25 at 2:29 P.M. A care plan conference note indicated that care plans were reviewed and were up to date. A risk for falls care plan, initiated 3/8/24, included, but were not limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection practices and standards were followed for 1 of 2 residents with catheters and 2 of 2 random observations. Staff did not perform adequate hand hygiene during catheter care and multi-resident use glucometers were not cleaned according to manufacture instructions. (Resident 47, Resident 17, and Resident 31)Finding includes: 1. During a random observation on 7/23/25 at 6:40 A.M., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 5 was observed cleaning a multi-resident use glucometer with an alcohol preparation pad after performing an Accu-Chek on Resident 17. 2. During a random observation on 7/23/25 at 7:00 A.M., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 5 was observed cleaning a multi-resident use glucometer with an alcohol preparation pad after performing an Accu-Chek on Resident 31. During an interview on 7/25/25 at 9:00 A.M., the Regional Director indicated glucometers were cleaned for 1 minute using cleaning wipes per manufacture's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis care was provided for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis. Routine assessments were not completed as ordered and the physician was not notified when a resident refused or stopped dialysis treatments early. (Resident B) Finding includes: During record review on 3/6/25 at 10:30 A.M., Resident B's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Resident B's most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/6/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and received dialysis services. Resident B's physician orders included, but were not limited to, dialysis treatment on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays (started 2/1/25), monitor dialysis dressing for bleeding, every day and night shift for left dialysis permacath (started 2/1/25). Resident B's care plan included, but was not limited to, resident needs dialysis due to renal failure (started 2/21/25). Interventions included, but were not limited to observe permacath for placement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of resident's narcotic medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. A resident's narcotic pain medication was missing. (Resident B) Finding includes: During record review on 12/17/24 at 10:39 a.m., Resident B's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, aphasia following cerebral infarction. A MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], indicated cognition was severely impaired. Care plans were reviewed and included, but were not limited to: Pain : I am at risk for pain related to Hx (history) of Cva (cerebral infarction). Interventions included, but were not limited to: Administer pain medications as ordered, date initiated, 6/26/24. A progress note dated 12/5/24 at 4:48 p.m., indicated Facility nurse noticed when checking to see if resident needed refill on Norco during hospice visit that medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide timely showers for 4 of 4 dependent residents reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living (Resident 4, Resident 2, Resident 13, and Resident 7) Findings include: 1. On 7/10/24 at 8:31 A.M., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy and flaccid neuropathic bladder, not elsewhere specified. The current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE]. The MDS indicated Resident 4 was cognitively intact and was dependent on transfer, mobility, eating, and hygiene. Physician orders included but not limited Weekly skin review on Saturdays on Day Shift dated 10/11/23 Showers are scheduled for Wednesday and Saturday and the day shift is 7-3 P.M. The current care plan indicated that Resident 4 has a self-care deficit related to primary diagnosis of cerebral palsy. Interventions included bathing assistance of dependent dated 10/20/23. The current care plan also indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public for 17 random observations on 5 of 6 days. Urine smells in unit hallways, conference rooms, common areas, stairwells.(100 Unit Hallway, 200 Unit Hallway, Basement Hallway, Conference Room, Stairwell off 100 Unit, Stairwell off 200 Unit) Findings include: 1. On 7/8/24 at 8:14 A.M., the smell of urine was observed in the 100 Unit Hallway. On 7/8/24 AT 8:15 A.M., the smell of urine was observed in the Stairwell off the 100 Unit Hallway. On 7/8/24 at 8:16 A.M., the smell of urine was observed in Basement Hallway. On 7/8/24 at 10:30 A.M., the smell of urine was observed in the 200 Unit Hallway and into the Common Area of the unit. 2. On 7/9/24 at 8:05 A.M., the smell of urine was observed in the 100 Unit Hallway. On 7/9/24 at 8:06 A.M., the smell of urine was observed in the Stairwell off the 100 Unit Hallway. On 7/9/24 at 8:17 A.M., the smell of urine was observed in Basement Hallway. On 7/9/24 at 10:30 A.M., the smell of urine was observed in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of needs by transporting a resident in an improperly fitted wheelchair for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for mobility. (Resident 8) Findings include: During an observation on 7/9/24 at 9:46 A.M., Resident 8 was observed sitting in a manual wheelchair in the hallway. Resident 8 indicated he was ready to get out of the wheelchair and go to bed. During an interview on 7/10/24 at 9:47 A.M., RN (Registered Nurse) 3 indicated the manual wheelchair was not Resident 8's personal wheelchair and was the one staff used for transportation due to Resident 8's personal electric wheelchair not being able to fit in the facility's mobility van. On 7/10/24 at 10:39 A.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 8 was admitted on [DATE]. Current diagnoses included, but were not limited to, quadriplegia, post traumatic seizures, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), stage four (4) pressure ulcers, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's physician of treatments not provided for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 8) Finding includes: On 7/10/24 at 10:39 A.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 8 was admitted on [DATE]. Current diagnoses included, but were not limited to, quadriplegia, post traumatic seizures, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), stage four (4) pressure ulcers, and contracture of muscle/joint. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 4/22/24, indicated Resident 8 was cognitively intact, and was fully dependent on staff for eating, toileting, bathing, and transfers. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Dakins external solution (sodium hypochlorite) Apply to coccyx topically every day and night shift for wounds, start date 7/3/24. Cleanse with Dakins Solution, apply silver alginate to the wound bed and cover with superabsorbent dressing every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by staff for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for facility reported incidents of staff to resident physical contact. (Resident 8) Finding includes: On 7/9/24 at 8:45 A.M., a facility reported incident, dated 3/13/24 at 3:01 A.M., was reviewed. The incident form indicated Resident 8 reported that during PM (evening) care, Employee 13 made contact to Resident's head. Employee 13 was immediately suspended pending investigation. A follow up added 3/21/24 indicated Resident 8 showed no signs of distress and Employee 13 chose not to participate in the investigation and resigned from employment. On 7/10/24 at 10:39 A.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 8 was admitted on [DATE]. Current diagnoses included, but were not limited to, quadriplegia and contracture of muscle/joint. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 4/22/24, indicated Resident 8 was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transport residents with proper documents, or transfers residents with legible documents for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident 8 and Resident 54) Findings include: 1. On 7/10/24 at 10:39 A.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 8 was admitted on [DATE]. Current diagnoses included, but were not limited to, quadriplegia, post traumatic seizures, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), stage four (4) pressure ulcers, and contracture of muscle/joint. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 4/22/24, indicated Resident 8 was cognitively intact, and was fully dependent on staff for eating, toileting, bathing, and transfers. The clinical record indicated during the past year, Resident 8 was discharged from the facility and admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and 5/10/24. A progress note dated 5/10/24 at 9:39 A.M., indicated Resident (was) sent to ER (emergency room). Transfer log, order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record and interview the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was completed accurately for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and bladder.(Resident 4) Findings include: On 7/10/24 at 8:31 A.M., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy and flaccid neuropathic bladder, not elsewhere specified. The current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE]. The MDS indicated Resident 4 was cognitively intact and was dependent on transfer, eating, and mobility. The Bowel and Bladder section indicated Resident 4 had an indwelling, suprapubic and external catheters with a colostomy. A Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] indicated that Resident 4 had an indwelling, suprapubic catheter and no external catheter or colostomy. Physician orders included but were not limited to: Change suprapubic catheter drainage bag weekly and PRN ( As Needed) dated 3/27/2024. Change catheter as needed (occlusion,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement physician orders or develop care plans for 3 of 5 resident's reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 4, Resident 9, Resident 15) Findings include: 1. On 7/10/24 at 8:31 A.M., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder, anxiety state, unspecified, chronic pain, essential primary hypertension and osteoarthritis. The current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 4 was cognitively intact and was dependent on transfer, eating, and mobility. During the 7 days look back period the resident was noted to be on the following types of medications: Antidepressant, Antianxiety, Antipsychotc, Opioid, and Diuretic. Current physician orders included: Norco Oral Tablet 7.5-325 MG (Milligrams) (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen)(pain medication).Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for Pain related to PRIMARY GENERALIZED…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was being properly administered for 1 of 1 random observations of insulin administration. (Resident 25) Finding includes: On 7/10/24 at 12:06 P.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 3 was observed preparing a Humalog Insulin Kwikpen for insulin administration for Resident 25. An AccuCheck (blood glucose test) indicated the resident had a blood sugar of 200. RN 3 indicated the resident received sliding scale insulin and was to receive 4 units of insulin lispro (a fast acting insulin) for a blood glucose reading of 200. RN 3 set the insulin pen to 6 units and indicated the resident got 4 units of insulin plus 2 units of insulin to prime the pen. She cleaned the tip of the pen, attached the needle, and administered 6 units of insulin to Resident 25 in her left arm. On 7/12/24 at 11:51 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 6 indicated insulin pens do not have to be primed and she had never primed an insulin pen before. On 7/12/24 at 1:46 P.M., the Humalog Kwikpen user manual was reviewed. It indicated Prime…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required restorative services received services in their plan of care for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for restorative nursing. (Resident 2, Resident 7, Resident 13) Findings include: 1. On 7/12/24 at 8:52 A.M., Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 2's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, weakness, and intellectual disabilities. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set Assessment), dated 6/3/24, indicated resident 2 was severely cognitively impaired, required substantial assistance of staff with toileting and transfers, and was dependent on staff for bathing. Care plans included, but were not limited to: Nursing rehab/restorative AROM (active range of motion) program: AROM to BLE (bilateral lower extremities), hips, knees, and ankles, 20 reps 1-2 sets daily; date initiated 9/13/22. On 7/12/24 at 12:14 p.m., the Administrator provided restorative nursing minutes documented in the clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to reduce the risk of falling for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. Falls were not accurately documented, and the care plan was not updated with new interventions for a resident with multiple falls. (Resident 6) Finding includes: On 7/9/24 at 9:49 A.M., Resident 6 indicated she had recently fallen and broken her nose because she could not reach her call light. On 7/9/24 at 2:58 P.M., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and history of falling. The most current Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 6/21/24, indicated Resident 6 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for transfers, and had 1 fall with major injury since the previous assessment. A Fall Risk Assessment, dated 6/11/24, indicated the resident was at risk for falls. A falls care plan, dated 12/20/22, indicated the resident was at risk for falls due to deconditioning, gait/balance problems,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders and implement plan of care relating to dialysis services for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for hemodialysis. (Resident 13) Finding includes: On 7/11/24 at 10:13 A.M., Resident 13's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 13 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, hypertension, and dementia. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 6/3/24, indicated Resident 13 was cognitively intact, required moderate assistance from staff for toileting and bathing, and was receiving hemodialysis. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Obtain weight after dialysis treatments one time a day every Monday, Wednesday, Friday; start date 6/21/24. Monitor left upper extremity for (signs and symptoms) of infection. Every day and night shift for fistula; start date 6/5/24. Dialysis diet, Regular texture; start date 5/27/24. Current care plans included, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that food was served at palatable temperatures for 1 of 1 meal tray tested for food temperature. Findings include: On 7/10/24 at 12:09 P.M., a meal test tray was obtained on the 200 Unit Hall the following temperatures were obtained: chicken thigh- 126.5 degrees F (Fahrenheit) potato -125.5 degrees F cottage cheese 48.2 degrees F desert chocolate eclair pudding- 67.5 degrees F salad 53.6-degrees F During an interview on 7/8/24 at 11:21 A.M., Resident 15 indicated the food is cold. During an interview on 7/9/24 9:43 A.M., Resident 6 indicated the food is not always hot. The CNA's (Certified Nurse Aide) won't serve food right away. During an interview on 7/9/24 at 11:35 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated the temperature for meats and vegetables should be greater than 165 degrees Fahrenheit and cold items should be less than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. On 7/15/24 at 8:55 A.M., the Administrator provided a current, nondated policy Record of Food Temperatures. The policy indicated .hot foods will be held at 135…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage of foods brought in externally for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for resident refrigerators. (Resident 8) Findings include: During an observation on 7/9/24 at 9:39 A.M., Resident 8's refridgerator had two blank temperature logs, dated June 2024 and July 2024, taped to the outside door of the refrigerator; no temperatures were recorded. On 7/10/24 at 10:39 A.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 8 was admitted on [DATE]. Current diagnoses included, but were not limited to, quadriplegia and contracture of muscle/joint. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 4/22/24, indicated Resident 8 was cognitively intact, and was fully dependent on staff for eating, toileting, bathing, and transfers. During an interview on 7/12/24 at 11:04 A.M., LPN 14 indicated each morning when staff do rounds to check on resident's, they record the temperature of resident room refrigerators on the paper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that documentation was completed entirely or accurately for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Duplicate medication order was entered, therapeutic leaves were not tracked, and documented skin assessments were not completed accurately. (Resident 15, Resident 8, and Resident 26) Findings include: 1. On 7/11/24 at 10:13 A.M., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, major depressive disorder. The most current Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 6/3/24, indicated Resident 15 was cognitively intact, required supervision for eating, and received an antidepressant medication during the 7-day look back period. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Sertraline (an antidepressant medication) Oral Capsule 150 mg (milligrams) - Give 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime related major depressive disorder, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure multi-resident use glucometers were cleaned according to manufacture instructions for 1 of 1 random observations. (100 unit) Finding includes: On 7/10/24 at 12:06 P.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 3 was observed cleaning a glucometer after acquiring a blood sugar from a resident. She wiped the machine with a Micro-kill Bleach wipe for 2 seconds and placed it in the medicine cart. On 7/11/24 at 12:58 P.M., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 4 indicated that to clean a glucometer you wipe the machine for 30 seconds using a bleach wipe and then let it air dry. On 7/15/24 at 9:53 A.M., the Infection Preventionist indicated that to clean a glucometer you wrap it in a bleach wipe for 3 minutes and place it in a water cup or on a paper towel so it became clean. On 7/11/24 at 10:15 A.M., the Administrator provided an EvenCare blood glucose monitoring system user's guide, dated 2022, that indicated Allow the surface of the meter or lancing device to remain wet at room temperature for the contact time listed on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 8/23/23 at 8:52 a.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. A progress note titled Clinical admission Evaluation dated 5/20/23 at 1:53 p.m. Late Entry: indicated that Resident B was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident B had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's disease, psychotic disturbance, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic pain syndrome, essential hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, unspecified asthma, systemic Lupus erytheematosus, emphysema. Care plans were reviewed and included, but were not limited to: Resident is on a regular diet, date initiated 5/22/24. (48 hours after admission) Other care plans reviewed started with a date of 5/24/23 or later. (96 hours after admission) On 8/23/23 at 1:10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-02 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services. The dietary manager lacked appropriate certification for 1 of 1 kitchen. Finding includes: On 8/31/22 at 10:00 A.M., employee records were reviewed. The current dietary manager lacked a state approved dietary certification. During an interview on 9/2/22 at 9:08 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the current dietary manager obtained that position on 2/2/18, and was currently working on becoming certified. On 9/2/22 at 10:21 A.M., a current manager of dining services job description, dated 9/27/15, was provided and indicated qualifications must include State approved dietary manager certificate or become certified within one year from hire date. 3.1-20(h)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 2 observations of the kitchen. The dishwasher was not tested with chemical strips, and the rinse solution container was empty. (Kitchen) Finding includes: During an initial kitchen observation on 8/29/22 at 7:27 A.M., a strip was placed in the dishwasher after a load was ran, and did not change color. At that time, the Kitchen Manager indicated she was unaware until recently that chemical strips were needed to test the dishwasher, and have had that dishwasher for about a year. At that time, the sanitizer container under the dishwasher was observed to be empty. On 8/29/22 at 7:56 A.M., the Kitchen Manager indicated the sanitizer, rinse, and detergent containers for the dishwasher were supposed to be changed when the solutions get to the bottom of the containers, and could be done by whoever was doing the dishes at that time. She indicated all staff were aware of when and how to change the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-02 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a qualified individual(s) as the Infection Preventionist with qualifying training or certification. The facility did not have a current certified Infection Preventionist for 1 of 1 employee file reviewed. Finding includes: During an interview on 8/29/22 at 10:21 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she was the Infection Preventionist, but was not yet certified. At that time, the DON indicated no other staff was acting as Infection Preventionist . The DON's hire date was 5/3/22. On 9/2/22 at 12:48 P.M., a current, undated Infection Preventionist policy was provided and indicated The facility will ensure the Infection Preventionist is qualified by education, training, experience or certification

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed and care plans were implemented for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for medications and treatments. Residents did not receive medications, side effects were not monitored, skin treatments not performed, labs not obtained, oxygen not applied/worn, care plan interventions not implemented. (Resident B, Resident M, Resident L, Resident K, Resident O, Resident P) Findings include: 1. On 8/29/22 at 8:22 a.m., Resident B indicated they did not always receive their insulin shot. On 8/31/22 at 1:58 p.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, not limited to, Diabetes Mellitus with stable proliferative diabetic retinopathy, hyphema, left eye, atelectasis unspecified. A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident B's cognition was moderately impaired. Care plans were reviewed and included, not limited to: Alteration in blood glucose due to: hyperglycemic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-02 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the temperature of food items were taken before food was served to residents for 1 of 1 meal observations. Findings include: On 8/31/22 at 7:16 A.M., [NAME] 49 was observed placing food items on trays to be delivered to residents. On 8/31/22 at 7:27 A.M., [NAME] 49 pushed the meal cart out of the kitchen to be delivered to the 200 hall residents. At that time, [NAME] 49 indicated temperatures were not taken for any of the following food items: oatmeal, waffles, sausage links, puree sausage, puree waffles, scrambled eggs, and gravy. During an interview on 9/1/22 at 10:17 A.M., the Dietician indicated all food items should have the temperature taken when the food items are on the steam table and right before being put on the plate from the steam table. On 9/2/22 at 12:48 P.M., a current undated Food Safety Requirements policy was provided and indicated .Cooking--foods shall be prepared as directed until recommended temperatures for the specific foods are reached . 3.1-21(a)(2)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary documentation to ensure a resident or responsible party was issued a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) before the proposed end of services for 1 of 3 beneficiary notices reviewed. (Resident 15) Finding includes: On 8/30/22 at 1:45 P.M., during review of three randomly chosen resident Medicare Part A discharge notices, Resident 15's notice stated, The facility/provider initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted, and a SNF ABN notification form was not provided, and a written note was provided from the facility that stated employee turnover new employee inserviced on process. On 9/1/22 at 1:16 P.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) indicated an ABN should have been completed. On 9/2/22 at 12:48 P.M., a current, undated Advance Beneficiary Notices policy was provided and indicated .The current CMS-approved [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] version of the forms shall be used at the time of issuance to the beneficiary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a notice of transfer or discharge was given to residents or resident representatives for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. There was no documentation of a resident or representative receiving a notice of transfer or discharge at the time of hospitalization. (Resident K, Resident C) Findings include: 1. On 8/30/22 at 10:23 A.M., Resident K's clinical record was reviewed. Resident K had been sent to the hospital on the following dates: From 5/6/22 through 5/12/22 - Resident K's clinical record lacked documentation of a transfer or discharge form being given to the resident or resident's representative. On 9/1/22 at 10:52 A.M., a notice of transfer or discharge form was provided for Resident K's hospital visit on 5/6/22, but the form was not filled out or dated. From 6/11/22 through 6/13/22 - Resident K's clinical record lacked documentation of a transfer or discharge form being given to the resident or resident's representative. During an interview on 9/1/22 at 10:52 A.M., the Regional Consultant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold policy was given to residents or resident representatives for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. There was no documentation of a resident or representative receiving a bed hold policy at the time of hospitalization. (Resident K, Resident C) Findings include: 1. On 8/30/22 at 10:23 A.M., Resident K's clinical record was reviewed. Resident K had been sent to the hospital on the following dates: From 5/6/22 through 5/12/22 - Resident K's clinical record lacked documentation of a bed hold policy being given to the resident or resident's representative. From 6/11/22 through 6/13/22 - Resident K's clinical record lacked documentation of a transfer or discharge form being given to the resident or resident's representative. During an interview on 9/1/22 at 10:52 A.M., the Regional Consultant indicated the transfer forms, including the bed hold policy, was not found for that hospitalization, and should have been provided. 2. On 9/1/22 at 1:26 P.M., Resident C's clinical record was reviewed. Resident C…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. Resident 62 had 16 falls April through August, care plan interventions were not followed. (Resident 62) Finding includes: During record review on 08/31/22 10:27 A.M., Resident 62's most recent quarterly MDS (Minimal Data Set) Assessment, dated 8/20/22, indicated the Resident was an extensive assist with 2 (two) staff members for transfers. Resident 62's diagnoses include, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, repeated falls, traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, fracture of unspecified part of right clavicle, with routine healing, unspecified displaced fracture of seventh cervical vertebra, with routine healing, multiple fractures of ribs, right side, with routine healing, unspecified fracture of the first thoracic vertebra, with routine healing, orthostatic hypotension, cerebral infarct, and syncope and collapse. Resident 62's care plan included, but was not limited to, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate greater than 5% for 2 of 26 opportunities observed to administer medications correctly, resulting in an error rate of 7.69%. This affected 2 of 5 residents observed during medication administration. (Resident K, Resident 40) Findings include: 1. On 8/30/22 at 9:55 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN 8) was observed to administer 2 (two) 110 mg (milligram) tablets of Zinc sulfate (A total of 220 mg) to Resident 40. The physician's orders included, but were not limited to, Zinc Tablet 50 MG Give 2 tablet by mouth one time a day for supplement. 2. On 8/31/22 at 7:35 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 15 removed an oatmeal from the meal cart and RN 15 pushed a liquid substance into Resident K's oatmeal and returned the oatmeal to the meal cart. During an interview at that time, RN 15 indicated the medication pushed into the oatmeal was Haldol. On 8/31/22 at 8:52 A.M., Resident K's clinical record was reviewed. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — isolated
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to test symptomatic residents for COVID-19 for 1 of 1 residents with signs and symptoms. A resident was not tested for COVID-19 until 7 days after symptoms started. (Resident 46) Finding includes: On 8/31/22 at 1:04 P.M., Resident 46's clinical record was reviewed. On 8/26/22 Resident 46 was tested for COVID-19 and had a positive result. During an interview on, 8/31/22 at 1:16 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated Resident 46 had COVID-19 symptoms starting on 8/19/22. The DON was unable to find a COVID-19 test result from 8/19/22 through 8/25/22. At that time, the DON indicated residents should currently be tested every Tuesday and Thursday of when symptoms start. On 9/2/22 at 12:48 P.M., a current Clinical Guidance for COVID-19 testing, dated 2/8/22, was provided and indicated when a symptomatic resident was identified, they should be tested for COVID-19 regardless of vaccination status. 3.1-18(b)

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their contingency plan for staff that are not fully vaccinated for 1 of 1 staff not fully vaccinated. (Staff 19) Finding includes: On 8/30/22 at 11:50 P.M., the COVID-19 staff vaccination status was reviewed. Staff 19 was documented as partially vaccinated. On 8/31/22 at 6:33 A.M., Staff 19 was observed wearing a surgical mask entering a room with 3 residents and was within an arms length of one of those residents. During an interview on 8/31/22 at 6:35 A.M., Staff 19 indicated administrative staff had said something about wearing an n95 while in the facility due to being partially vaccinated. During an interview on 9/2/22 at 9:30 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she was unsure why Staff 19 was working due to facility policy that employees without exemption or approved delay are required to have unpaid leave until fully vaccinated. On 8/29/22 at 10:00 A.M., a current COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing policy, revised 4/18/22, indicated .Any employee that has not provided .an approved delay in vaccination…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment in resident spaces in 2 of 3 halls observed. Holes in door, broken footboard, SHARPS container full at bedside, personal care items uncovered and unlabeled.(100 Hall, 200 Hall) Findings include: 1. On 8/30/22 at 8:54 A.M., in the shared bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a quarter size hole in the bathroom door, an unlabeled, used urinal on the sink, an uncovered plunger on the floor, uncovered wash basin with used rags on the floor, bucket on floor open with paper towels and an empty, unlabeled urinal in it. In the bedroom, there were 4 (four) used gloves and an empty medication cup on the floor. On 9/2/22 at 9:10 A.M., there was still a quarter size hole in the bathroom door and an uncovered plunger on the floor. 2. On 8/29/22 at 9:03 A.M., in room [ROOM NUMBER], the footboard of bed closest to the bathroom was broken and hanging off the bed and there were multiple black…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-09-02 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide staffing information on 2 of 3 units (100 unit, 200 unit) and failed to ensure the correct date was posted for staffing forms for 5 of 5 days during the survey. Posted nurse staffing was only able to be viewed in the front lobby. Resident units 100, 200, and 300 all failed to have staffing information posted in resident areas. Findings include: On 8/29/22 at 6:53 A.M., a staffing form, dated 8/25/22 was observed to be posted in the front lobby. On 8/30/22 at 2:33 P.M., a staffing form, dated 8/29/22 was observed in the front lobby. On 8/31/22 at 11:10 A.M., a staffing form, dated 8/30/22 was observed in the front lobby. On 9/1/22 at 8:06 A.M., a staffing form, dated 8/31/22 was observed in the front lobby. On 9/2/22 at 7:55 A.M., a staffing form, dated 9/1/22 was observed in the front lobby. During an interview on 9/2/22 at 8:33 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the staffing forms were posted by the time clock and front door and was unsure if the staffing forms should be posted on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 22 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Bloomington Care CenterBloomington, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Elkhart Care CenterElkhart, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Golden Rule Care CenterRichmond, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville Care CenterMerrillville, IN 1 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Richmond Care CenterRichmond, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Brandywine Care CenterGreenfield, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview Care CenterMishawaka, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Laporte Care CenterLa Porte, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Portage Care CenterPortage, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Terrace Care CenterLa Porte, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Twelfth Street Care CenterMishawaka, IN 2 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Willow Springs Care CenterIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Brookview Care CenterIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Muncie Care CenterMuncie, IN 3 of 5Brickyard Healthcare -Sycamore Village Care CenterKokomo, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Churchman Care CenterIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Lincoln Hills Care CenterTell City, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Petersburg Care CenterPetersburg, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Valparaiso Care CenterValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Woodlands Care CenterNewburgh, IN 5 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Brentwood Care CenterEvansville, IN 5 of 5Brickyard Healthcare - Knox Care CenterKnox, IN

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MEADOWS, MICHAELIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/13/2022
GENTRY, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/12/2022
WHICKER, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/12/2022
ENGELS, ERINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/25/2014
FENOUGHTY, DEANNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/10/2023
STARKEY, TYLERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2020
WAITE, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2020
GGNSC EVANSVILLE WOODBRIDGE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2012

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$391K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 80%Medicare 7%Other / private 13%

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $391K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$415per resident / day
operating cost
$12,609per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$412per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155390. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next