Brickyard Healthcare - Brandywine Care Center
745 N Swope St, Greenfield, IN 46140 · For profit - Corporation · 128 certified beds · (317) 462-9221 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.4% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.1% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.2% | 25.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 3.9% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.8% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.5% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.8% | 95.4% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.8% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.2% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 52.9% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 38.0% | 22.2% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.7% | 10.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.29 | 1.61 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.60 | 1.44 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.5%CMS range 33.9–62.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.3%CMS range 8.7–17.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 4.2–16.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.20 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 80.6 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-11-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely develop individualized plans of care for residents who displayed behaviors, document behavioral incidents in the clinical record, document effectiveness of interventions used to manage behaviors, review behaviors with an interdisciplinary team, and provide adequate supervision resulting in increased behaviors and resident-to-resident altercations. (Resident C, D, G, H, and J)Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 11/12/25 at 11: 15 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dementia and anxiety disorder.A physician's order, dated 8/18/25, indicated behavior monitoring for Depression every day and night shift for depression.A Quarterly MDS Assessment, completed 8/29/25, indicated she had severe cognitive impairment. She had exhibited physical and verbal behaviors directed toward others one to three days during the seven day look back period. She had displayed behaviors not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to prevent three events of resident-to-resident physical abuse perpetrated by Resident B for 3 of 5 resident reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in Resident D, Resident G, and Resident E being physically assaulted by Resident B and experiencing negative psychosocial outcomes. Findings include: The facility incident reports, dated from 7/8/2024 through 8/10/2024, indicated Resident B perpetrated resident-to-resident physical abuse on three events as follows: Event 1: 7/8/2024 indicated an event of resident-to-resident physical abuse perpetrated by Resident B occurred at 5:10 p.m. when Resident B was sitting in a wheelchair in the threshold of a staff member's door. The report indicated Resident D attempted to pass through the threshold, Resident B would not move, and Resident B tapped Resident D on the shoulder. Interventions for Resident B and Resident D were listed as: head-to-assessments, 15-minute checks, psychosocial follow up, reviewing of care plans, and updating care plans as needed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to file a grievance for a resident expressed concerns about not getting timely assistance with toileting for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for grievances (Resident F). Findings include:During an interview with the Social Service Director (SSD) on 3/12/26 at 11:28 a.m., the SSD indicated she did not file a grievance for Resident F when the resident expressed care concerns during a care plan meeting on 2/26/26. The SSD was unsure if nursing had done anything for the resident, because Unit Manager 1 was also present during the care plan meeting. During an interview with Unit Manager 1 on 3/12/26 at 11:32 a.m., the Unit Manager indicated she did not file a grievance for Resident F after the resident expressed concerns in her care plan meeting on 2/26/26 about not getting timely assistance with her toileting needs. Review of the clinical record of Resident F, on 3/13/26 at 1:25 p.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of sacrum (bone at the base of the spine), muscle weakness, fracture of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the provider's ordered wound care for a resident's wound care treatment for 1 of 4 resident reviewed for Quality of Care. (Resident E) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 3/12/26 at 9:33 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, hypertension, and lymphedema (abnormal accumulation of protein-rich fluid in soft tissues, resulting in swelling, usually in the arms or legs). The wound care provider note, dated 10/21/25, indicated the treatment plan for the non-pressure chronic ulcer to Resident E's left perineum was to cleanse the area with sterile water and the peri-wound (area of skin surrounding a wound, essential for healing by serving as a protective barrier) area with soap and water. The peri-wound skin treatment was SurePrep (water-base, non-stinging polymer barrier film used in medical settings to protect intact or damaged skin from friction, bodily fluids and adhesive stripping) protective wipes. The primary dressing was Hydrofera Blue Ready (a non-cytotoxic,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a resident for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed for abuse. (Resident C)Findings include: 1.a. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 11/12/25 at 11:10 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, dementia and diabetes.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, completed 8/25/25, indicated she had severe cognitive impairment.Resident C's clinical record contained a general note, dated 11/3/25 at 5:33 p.m. The general note indicated a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had come to get the nurse due to another resident slapping Resident C. The other resident also attempted to choke Resident C. The residents were separated. Resident C was sitting in her room. Resident C had redness to her right cheek and right side of her neck. Resident C stated the other resident had only slapped her and she did not think the choking had happened, but it all happened so fast. Resident C indicated she was okay and felt safe.1.b. The clinical record for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess a resident's vitals and lung sounds after routine breathing treatments were administered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident B)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 11/12/25 at 11:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension (high blood pressure), atherosclerotic (plaque buildup in arteries) heart disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and stroke. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/19/25, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact. A care plan, dated 3/26/25, indicated the resident had COPD due to smoking. The interventions included but were not limited to the following: bronchodilators as ordered, monitor effectiveness, and head of bed elevated.A care plan, dated 3/26/25, indicated the resident had COPD due to smoking. The interventions included, but were not limited, administer aerosol or bronchodilators as ordered. Monitor and document any side effects and effectiveness, resident's head of bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely notify the attending physician, hospice provider, and the resident's representative of a lack of pain medication and continued status of the medication's unavailability for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain medication receipt. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record of Resident B was reviewed on 6-26-25 at 12:24 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, polyosteoarthritis, unspecified severe dementia and late onset Alzheimer's disease. His most recent Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6-12-25, indicated his cognition was severely impaired, he received routine or scheduled pain medication and received hospice services. An observation of Resident B, on 6-26-25 at 10:16 a.m., revealed his speech was unclear, not in response to situation and with no discernable speech pattern. A review of his May 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) denoted he did not receive his physician-ordered medication of Norco (an opioid combination product of hydrocodone and acetaminophen) 5-325…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently document the pain status of 1 of 3 residents revived for receipt of pain medications during a time period of five days when the resident was without their physician ordered and routinely scheduled opioid pain medication. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record of Resident B was reviewed on 6-26-25 at 12:24 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, polyosteoarthritis, unspecified severe dementia and late onset Alzheimer's disease. His most recent Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6-12-25, indicated his cognition was severely impaired, he received routine or scheduled pain medication and received hospice services. An observation of Resident B on 6-26-25 at 10:16 a.m., revealed his speech was unclear, not in response to situation and with no discernable speech pattern. Resident B did not display any signs of pain or discomfort at that time. During the entrance conference with the Executive Director on 6-25-25, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents reviewed for receipt of pain medications received their medications as ordered by the physician and failed to ensure an investigation was conducted into the issue of the lack of receipt of scheduled pain medication for five days. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record of Resident B was reviewed on 6-26-25 at 12:24 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, polyosteoarthritis, unspecified severe dementia and late onset Alzheimer's disease. His most recent Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6-12-25, indicated his cognition was severely impaired, he received routine or scheduled pain medication and received hospice services. An observation of Resident B, on 6-26-25 at 10:16 a.m., revealed his speech was unclear, not in response to situation and with no discernable speech pattern. During the entrance conference with the Executive Director on 6-25-25, she indicated she was unaware of any medication errors since she arrived to the facility in early May 2025. On 6-25-25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were held quarterly for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for care planning. (Resident G, Resident 22, Resident 39, and Resident 80) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident G was reviewed on 3/19/25 at 2:58 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, anxiety disorder, insomnia, vertigo, and neoplasm of uncertain behavior of skin. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/16/25, indicated Resident G was severely cognitively impaired. An interview conducted with a family member of Resident G, on 3/19/25 at 11:25 a.m., indicated she was the power of attorney (POA) for Resident G and the facility was not good with communication. There had not been a care plan meeting for a long time. A progress note titled Care Plan Meeting Minutes, dated 10/11/24, indicated a quarterly care plan meeting was held with the family member of Resident G. There were no further indications of a care plan meeting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assisted with eating timely that resulted in the resident taking food and drinks from other residents (Resident 67), ensure a resident was assisted with changing his clothes and assisted with shaving (Resident G), ensure a resident was provided showers as preferred (Resident J), and ensure assistance with transfer/ambulation (Resident 190) for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 67 was reviewed on 3/21/25 at 11:49 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia, alcohol-induced persisting dementia, and anxiety disorder. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/30/25, indicated severe cognitive impairment and supervision with one staff person for eating. An ADL care plan, revised 10/24/24, indicated Resident 67 was able to eat with setup assistance of one staff person. An observation was conducted of lunch meal service in the Alzheimer's Care Unit (ACU) on 3/19/25 from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident B and Resident H) Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 3/20/2025 at 11:30 a.m. The medical diagnoses included dementia and anxiety. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 12/20/2024, indicated Resident B was cognitively impaired, did not have behaviors of rejecting care, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and dependent on staff for toileting needs. An incontinence care plan, revised 2/2/2025, indicated Resident B had functional bladder incontinence. Resident B needed interventions of checking and changing incontinent products as needed. A grievance form, dated 2/26/2025, indicated a concern was filed regarding Resident B being left sitting in his chair for an extended period and regarding the last time he was assisted with toileting needs. 1b. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 3/19/2025 at 2:04 p.m. The medical diagnosis included anxiety disorder. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely follow up on a resident's request to be transferred to the hospital for treatment regarding scrotal swelling and pain for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for choices. (Resident J) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident J was reviewed on 3/21/2025 at 12:45 p.m. The medical diagnoses included respiratory failure and diabetes. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/7/2025, indicated Resident J was cognitively intact and did not exhibit behaviors. A care plan, revised 11/15/2023, indicated Resident J had depression and a psychotic disorder. Interventions were listed to allow and encourage choices. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 12:12 p.m., Resident J indicated earlier this month he had swelling to his scrotum. He requested to go to the emergency room, but the nurse came in and told him to take some pain medicine. He stated he took the pain medicine and then asked to go to the ER [emergency room], but she wouldn't send him. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a grievance was forwarded to the grievance official and failed to implement a resolution of a grievance for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for grievances. (Resident H and Resident B) Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident H was reviewed on 3/21/2025 at 11:30 a.m. The medical diagnoses included diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/10/2025, indicated Resident H was cognitively intact, did not reject care, and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Care plans, revised 2/24/2025, indicated Resident H had incontinence of bowel and bladder and required the need for assistance with incontinence care. During an interview with Resident H on 3/18/2025 at 1:45 p.m., she indicated she filled out two grievances since she had been in the facility. She believed one grievance was filled out at the end of February, the other was filled out about two weeks ago, and both were given to Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 9. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately input medication data into the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for MDS accuracy. (Resident 70) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 70 was reviewed on 3/20/25 at 11:41 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus and dementia. The admission MDS assessment, dated 2/14/25, indicated Resident 70 was on an anti-coagulant (blood thinner) and an antibiotic. Resident 70's Electronic Health Record (EHR) indicated no current order for an antibiotic or an anti-coagulant. The EHR indicated Resident 70 was on Plavix, which is considered an anti-platelet drug, not an anti-coagulant. During an interview with the MDS Coordinator on 3/20/25 at 12:08 p.m., she indicated she should have marked the anti-platelet tab and not the anti-coagulant tab while entering information into the Resident Assessment Instrument for inputting data. The MDS Coordinator indicated it was her error. The MDS Coordinator also indicated she thought Resident 70 was still on an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to establish care plans for refusals of care (Resident H), psychological needs (Resident J), and transfer/ambulation status (Resident 190) for 3 of 8 residents reviewed for care planning. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident H was reviewed on 3/21/2025 at 11:30 a.m. The medical diagnoses included diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/10/2025, indicated Resident H was cognitively intact, did not reject care, and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of shower documentation for Resident H indicated she refused nine showers in the last 60 days. No care plan was on file for Resident H's refusals of care. 2. The clinical record for Resident J was reviewed on 3/21/2025 at 12:15 p.m. The medical diagnoses included respiratory failure and diabetes. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/7/2025, indicated Resident J was cognitively intact and did not exhibit behaviors. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 12:12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a wound dressing remained in place as ordered (Resident G) and weekly skin assessments were conducted per the facility policy (Resident 59) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin concerns. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident G was reviewed on 3/19/25 at 2:58 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, anxiety disorder, insomnia, vertigo, and neoplasm of uncertain behavior of skin. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/16/25, indicated Resident G was severely cognitively impaired and had open lesions. A care plan, revised 1/25/25, indicated Resident G had skin impairment related to skin cancer to the right temple. The interventions included, but were not limited to, follow facility protocols for treatment of injury. A physician order, dated 2/18/25, indicated the cleanse the right forehead with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Vaseline, then cover with foam every other day and as needed for soilage. An interview conducted with a family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had weekly skin assessments for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. (Resident 39) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 39 was reviewed on 3/19/25 at 2:23 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, polyneuropathy, pain, and anxiety. Resident 39 had a care plan, initiated 1/20/25, for potential for pressure ulcer development with an intervention to follow facility policies/protocols for the prevention/treatment of skin breakdown. The Braden Scale (for predicting pressure ulcer risk evaluation document), dated 2/24/25, indicated Resident 39 had a Braden score of 12, indicating Resident 39 was at high risk for developing pressure ulcers. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/26/25, indicated Resident 39 was cognitively intact, was dependent on a mechanical lift for transfer, was chairfast, always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was at risk for pressure injuries. Resident 39's weekly skin assessments indicated they had a skin assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a Range of Motion (ROM) program and splint program for a resident with limited ROM for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for ROM (Resident 75). Findings include During an interview with Resident 75 on 3/19/25 at 11:29 a.m., he indicated the facility does not provide him with ROM exercises. The resident indicated he was stiff and needed assistance moving all his extremities. The resident indicated he would like to be provided with ROM exercises. Review of the clinical record of Resident 75, on 3/19/25 at 2:00 p.m., indicated the diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting the right dominant side, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, depression and anxiety. The Occupational Therapy evaluation and plan for Resident 75, dated 8/2/24, indicated the goal was for the resident's family and caregivers to be provided with education and training on adaptive hemi-techniques, approach, encouragement, and safest strategies to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to fully conduct a fall follow-up and implement interventions after a fall for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 59) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 59 was reviewed on 3/21/25 at 12:33 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, asthma, Alzheimer's disease, chronic pain, and unspecified psychosis. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/8/25, indicated Resident 59 was severely cognitively impaired, supervision with transferring, supervision with walking, and had a fall with injury since the last MDS assessment. A care plan for falls, revised 1/12/25, indicated Resident 59 was at risk for falls related to confusion and psychoactive drug use. The interventions included, but were not limited to, activities that minimized the potential for falls (initiated on 11/18/24) and staff to help when doing rounds (initiated on 2/28/25). A post fall evaluation note, dated 1/24/25 at 10:46 a.m., indicated Resident 59 fell on 1/21/25 at 12:30 a.m. Resident 59 was startled by a sounding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with weight loss were encouraged to consume supplements as recommended by the Registered Dietitian (RD) for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident D and Resident 46) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 3/20/25 at 2:58 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia, alcohol-induced psychotic disorder, diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, and major depressive disorder. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/3/25, indicated Resident D had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff with eating. A physician order, dated 3/18/25, indicated Resident D was on a puree diet with nectar/mildly thick consistency for liquids. A care plan for nutrition, revised 3/16/25, indicated Resident D was on a puree diet, had a history of significant weight loss, and food was to be served in mugs and thinned to nectar consistency. The interventions included, but were not limited to, providing and serve diet as ordered,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen administration. (Resident 241) Findings include: During an observation of Resident 241 on 3/18/25 at 2:22 p.m., Resident 241 had oxygen tubing on by nasal cannula. The oxygen tubing did not have a date to indicate when it was last changed. During an observation of Resident 241 on 3/19/25 at 12:48 p.m., Resident 241 had oxygen tubing on by nasal cannula. The oxygen tubing was not dated. The clinical record for Resident 241 was reviewed on 3/19/25 at 2:15 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and respiratory failure. A care plan, initiated on 3/13/25, indicated Resident 241 was on continuous oxygen at two liters per minute via nasal cannula. During an observation on 3/21/25 at 2:21 p.m., Resident 241's oxygen tubing was not dated. During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) 6 on 3/21/25 at 2:22 p.m., they indicated they did not know why the oxygen tubing was not dated. RN 6 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received scheduled pain medication received follow-up to ensure effectiveness after receiving scheduled pain medication, ensure follow-up after a scheduled appointment pertaining to chronic back pain, and ensure Lidoderm (pain relief) patches were documented when applied and removed after 12 hours for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pain. (Resident 78) Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident 78 was reviewed on 3/21/25 at 12:39 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic back pain, dementia, and hypertension. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/13/25, indicated Resident 78 was moderately cognitively impaired, received scheduled pain medication, did not receive as needed pain medication, did not receive non-pharmalogical interventions for pain, had frequent pain in the last five days, and documented the worst pain rating over the last five days as a 5 out of 10. A physician order, dated 8/2/24, was noted for Extra Strength Tylenol 500…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 15-minute checks were initiated for a resident with behaviors for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for behavior monitoring. (Resident E) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 3/20/25 at 9:42 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diffuse traumatic brain injury and alcohol dependence. The Director of Nursing Services provided a facility incident report on 3/20/25 at 11:33 a.m. It indicated an incident occurred, on 2/18/25, when facility staff alleged Resident E had his hand down another resident's pants. It indicated the facility employee was unaware of the location of Resident E's hands and the two residents were immediately separated. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/26/24, indicated Resident E had moderate cognitive impairment. A written statement from Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 8, dated 2/19/25, indicated, on 2/18/25 after dinner, she saw two residents, one of them being Resident E sitting next to each other. She noticed the two residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely follow-up on a resident's psychosocial needs regarding his roommate exhibiting inappropriate behavior in front of him for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for behaviors. (Resident J) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident J was reviewed on 3/21/2025 at 12:45 p.m. The medical diagnoses included respiratory failure and diabetes. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/7/2025, indicated Resident J was cognitively intact and did not exhibit behaviors. A care plan, revised 11/15/2023, indicated Resident J had depression and a psychotic disorder. Interventions were listed to encourage activities, provide emotional support, companionship, and to provide opportunities to voice mental health concerns to staff. During an interview on 3/19/2025 at 12:12 p.m., Resident J indicated his roommate (Resident E) will engage in the act of self-pleasure with the door and curtain open. This act made Resident J feel dirty and disgusted. Resident J reported this to staff about a month to six weeks ago per his recall, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer an anticoagulant medication as ordered by the physician, which resulted in receiving the medication for an excessive duration for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for death. (Resident 88) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 88 was reviewed on 3/24/25 at 11:53 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, a-fib (atrial fibrillation.) The 8/27/24 care plan indicated she was at risk for complications related to anticoagulant medication due to atrial fibrillation. The goal was for her to remain without complications from bleeding or injury. Interventions, initiated 8/27/24, were to observe for adverse reactions such as cramps, diarrhea, hemorrhage, and signs and symptoms of bleeding such as tarry stools and blood in the urine. The December 2024 physician's orders indicated to administer one five mg tablet of apixaban, also known as Eliquis (anticoagulant medication that makes blood flow through your veins more easily), two times a day, effective 8/26/24. The 12/21/24 at 6:02 p.m. change of condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow-up on dental recommendations for a tooth extraction for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dental services. (Resident G and Resident 12) Findings include: 1. An observation conducted of Resident G, on 3/19/25 at 10:05 a.m., noted broken teeth. An interview conducted with a family member of Resident G, on 3/19/25 at 11:25 a.m., indicated she was the power of attorney (POA) for Resident G and the facility was not good with communication. Resident G had a tooth infection back in December of 2024. She was unsure if Resident G's infected tooth had been pulled. She signed consent forms for Resident G to be seen by the dentist. She believed he was seen by the in-house dentist on 2/27/25. She indicated she was told the in-house dentist provider would be able to assist with the tooth extraction for Resident G. The clinical record for Resident G was reviewed on 3/19/25 at 2:58 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, anxiety disorder, insomnia, vertigo, and neoplasm of uncertain behavior of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate thickened liquids were provided for 2 of 5 residents observed for dining. (Resident 46 and Resident D) Findings include: 1. An observation was conducted of the lunch meal service in the Alzheimer's Care Unit (ACU) on 3/19/25 from 12:15 p.m. to 12:55 p.m. During the observation, Resident D was assisted with eating by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 2. Resident D's food items were a certain consistency and provided in handled cups. Resident D's meal ticket indicated he was on a puree diet with nectar thickened liquids. There was another meal tray located just behind CNA 2 and located on the kitchen island. That meal tray consisted of a meal ticket with Resident 46's name on it with a diet of puree with honey thickened liquids. CNA 2 reached for an orange liquid that was located on Resident 46's meal tray, removed the lid from the cup, and proceeded to assist Resident D with consuming the thickened orange drink. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 3/20/25 at 2:58 p.m. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during a medication administration observation for 2 of 5 residents observed for medication administration. (Facility) Findings include: An observation of medication administration was conducted, on 3/20/25 from 8:10 a.m. to 8:40 a.m., with Registered Nurse (RN) 4. RN 4 proceeded to prepare morning medications for Resident 246. RN 4 donned gloves prior to taking a bottle of Mirilax, poured the Mirilax medication into water to dissolve, and gave the morning medications for Resident 246 to take. RN 4 proceeded to remove the gloves but did not conduct hand hygiene after glove removal. RN 4 then went to prepare morning medications for Resident 247. RN 4 donned gloves, without conducting hand hygiene, retrieved an insulin pen, used an alcohol wipe to wipe off the hub of the insulin pen, applied the needle, primed the insulin pen with two units, and then administered the insulin to Resident 247's left thigh. RN 4 returned to the medication cart to place the insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for administration of the 2024-2025 Covid-19 vaccination and administer or arrange for administration of the vaccination, per policy, for 2 residents who consented to receive it out of 5 residents reviewed for Covid-19 vaccination. (Residents 23 and 50) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 23 was reviewed on 3/25/25 at 9:45 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, end stage renal disease, and hypertension. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Covid-19 Vaccine Consent Form, signed by Resident 23 on 10/16/24, indicated he was screened for eligibility, education on the vaccination, and consented to receive the updated Covid-19 vaccine. The immunizations portion of the electronic health record indicated the most recent Covid-19 vaccination for him was administered on 1/26/23. 2. The clinical record for Resident 50 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from a physical restraint during a blood sugar check for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. The deficient practice was corrected on 10/23/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 11/12/24 at 12:30 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, mood disorder, and diabetes. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and resided on the memory care unit of the facility. The 8/26/24 dementia care plan indicated the goal was for her to be able to communicate basic needs on a daily basis. Interventions were to explain all procedures and reason before performing, initiated 8/26/24, and pleasant interaction, which reassures patient when confused, initiated 8/26/24. The 10/17/24 psychiatry progress note indicated, Assessment and Plan: 1. Mood disorder: No recent behavioral issues per staff report.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment regarding use of an outside door for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for environmental hazards. (Resident G) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident G was reviewed on 8/21/24 at 10:58 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, borderline personality disorder. An interview was conducted with Resident G on 8/20/24 at 1:45 p.m. He indicated there was a back door at the end of the hallway in the facility that led to the parking lot. The door had sharp edges that cut him several times when he used it. The maintenance staff put a metal piece around the edge of the door, but the piece broke down within months, so now they put duct tape over the broken-down areas on the edge of the door. The duct tape wore through in no time, and had to be replaced every week or so. He felt they needed to replace the door, instead of continuing to put temporary fixes in place. He used the door numerous times a day to smoke or to spend time outside of the facility. He currently had two cuts,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of a complete and thorough investigating to include the identification of potentially vulnerable residents and prevention of further abuse for 3 of 3 investigations reviewed. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 8/20/2024 at 11:45 a.m. Medical diagnoses included bipolar disorder, intellectual disabilities, encephalopathy, and anxiety disorder. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident B was severely cognitively impaired, exhibited physical, verbal, and wandering for one to three days of the last seven reviewed, and exhibited rejection of care for four to six of the last seven days reviewed. A behavior care plan, dated 1/24/2024, indicated that Resident B had a history of exhibiting aggressive behaviors such as hitting, grabbing, pinching and kicking. Interventions, dated 1/24/2024, included: Assisting Resident B to not enter other's personal space, redirect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a resident's dressing changes timely, as ordered, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions. (Resident D) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 8/20/24 at 11:27 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, lymphedema, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. He was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on 8/11/24. The 6/5/24 Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated he was cognitively intact. The 8/11/24, 2:22 p.m. Nursing Clinical admission Note indicated, Skin note: cellulitis left leg, weeping and red in appearance. Special Care: .Resident currently on antibiotics. Antibiotic name: cefuroxime Dx [Diagnosis:] cellulitis. The 8/11/24, revised 8/12/24, physician's order indicated, Wound Care: left lateral leg: Cleanse with wound cleanser and pat dry. Apply collagen to wound bed and cover with border gauze. Change every other day and PRN [as needed] if soiled or dislodged. One time a day every other day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the resident's representative following a fall with injury for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for falls. (Residents E and G) Findings include: 1. The clinical record of Resident E was reviewed on 7-16-24 at 11:52 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, a neurocognitive disorder with [NAME] Body and unspecified dementia. She was admitted to the facility in, June 2024, for a short-term respite stay of less than 2 weeks, into the facility's secured dementia care unit. Her admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6-25-24, indicated she was severely cognitively impaired, was ambulatory and had a history of falls in the previous one to six months, prior to admission to the facility. A progress note, dated 6-25-24 at 2:00 p.m., indicated Resident E had been agitated and she was taking her clothes off. It indicated a nurse assessed the resident and found [a] bump on her left forehead. A notation, dated 6/25/2024 at 2:21 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the time of bathing preferences for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for bathing needs. (Resident 30 and 32) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 30 was reviewed on 11/8/2024 at 10:48 a.m. The medical diagnosis included dementia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/6/2023, indicated Resident 30 was cognitively impaired and did not reject care. A resident preference evaluation, dated 11/16/2023, indicated that Resident 30 preferred to take showers in the morning. The facility task documentation indicated to offer Resident 30 showers two times a week on Tuesday and Friday evenings. 2. The clinical record for Resident 32 was reviewed on 1/9/2024 at 10:26 a.m. The medical diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease. A Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated for 12/20/2023, indicated Resident 32 was cognitively intact and did not reject care. An interview with Resident 32 on 1/3/2023 at 11:58 a.m. indicated that she does not get her showers when she would like them. She stated her preference was to have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide nail care for a dependent resident with bilateral hand contractures for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Activities Of Daily Living (ADL) (Resident 29). Finding include: During an observation on 1/03/24 at 11:18 a.m.,. Resident 29 had long fingernails on both hands with peeling fingernail polish, the resident had bilateral hand contractures and the resident's fingernails were pressing into the palms of her hands. During an interview with Resident 29's family member on 1/03/24 at 11:40 a.m., indicated Resident 29's fingernails were too long and needed to be trimmed. During an observation on 1/04/24 at 1:04 p.m., Resident 29 had long fingernails on both hands with peeling fingernail polish, the resident had bilateral hand contractures and the resident's fingernails were pressing into the palms of her hands. During on observation on 1/05/24 at 10:38 a.m., Resident 29 had long fingernails on both hands with peeling fingernail polish, the resident had bilateral hand contractures and the resident's fingernails…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain daily weights as ordered by the physician for Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), failed to follow the physician order to hold blood pressure medications per parameters and failed to obtain Foley catheter and catheter care orders for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident 61, Resident 14 and Resident 9). Findings include: 1.) Review of the record of Resident 61 on 1/8/23 at 11:40 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure. The January 2024 physician Recapitulation order for Resident 61, (original order date 2/23/23), indicated the resident was to have daily weights completed due to congestive heart failure. The facility was to notify the physician/Nurse Practitioner if the resident has 3 pounds or greater gain in 1 day or 5 pounds or more in a week. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 61, dated December 2023, indicated the resident weight was 105.8 pounds on 12/23/23, the resident's weight was not completed on 12/24/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and observations, the facility failed to utilize pressure relieving boots for a dependent resident at risk for developing pressure areas for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pressure areas. (Resident 9) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 9 was reviewed on 1/5/2023 at 2:40 p.m. The medical diagnoses included stroke and Alzheimer's disease. An admission Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated for 12/8/2023, indicated that Resident 9 had both short- and long-term memory problems, was dependent on staff for activities of daily living, utilized an indwelling urinary catheter, was at risk for pressure areas, and currently had three pressure areas. A pressure area care plan, dated for 12/11/2023, indicated for Resident 9 to utilized prevalon boots, a type of pressure reliving boots. An observation on 1/2/2024 at 11:45 a.m. indicated Resident 9 laying in bed with a low air loss mattress in place. Her prevalon boots were sitting next to her bed in a chair. An observation on 1/2/2024 at 1:40 p.m. indicated Resident 9 laying in bed with a low air loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide fortified pudding at lunch as ordered by the physician for a resident with a history of significant weight loss for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 61). Finding include: During an observation on 1/03/24 at 12:33 p.m., Resident 61 was thin in appearance. During an observation on 1/04/24 at 1:02 p.m., Resident 61 was eating lunch in her room, the resident did not have fortified pudding on her tray. During an observation and interview on 1/05/24 at 12:52 p.m., Resident 61 was eating lunch in her room, the resident did not have fortified pudding on her tray. The resident's tray card indicated she was to have fortified pudding. Resident 61 indicated sometimes she received her fortified pudding and sometimes she did not. Review of the record of Resident 61 on 1/8/23 at 11:40 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, muscle weakness, gastro-esophageal reflux and chronic kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician reviewed and signed medication regimen reviews (MRR) for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 14 and 50) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 14 was reviewed on 1/9/2024 at 10:32 a.m. The medical diagnoses included anxiety and disorganized schizophrenia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 1/2/2024, indicated Resident 14 was cognitively intact. A MRR review, dated for 6/28/2023, indicated a recommendation for a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for Zoloft or guidance to document a contraindication to the GDR. This MRR was not signed by a provided until 8/28/2023 to reflect to attempt the GDR for Resident 14's Zoloft. The attending physician visited Resident 14 on 7/8/2023. The psychiatric nurse practitioner visited Resident 14 on 7/13/2023. 2. Resident 50's record was reviewed on 1/04/24 at 11:10 a.m. The record indicated Resident 50 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, dementia with psychotic disturbance, anxiety, high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 22 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCCREARY, COLLEEN | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 12/27/2022 |
| ENGELS, ERIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/01/2014 |
| GENTRY, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/12/2022 |
| STARKEY, TYLER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 08/01/2020 |
| WAITE, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 08/01/2020 |
| WHICKER, TIMOTHY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/12/2022 |
| FENOUGHTY, DEANNA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/10/2023 |
| BRANDYWINE INDIANA OPERATING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2012 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $635K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155120. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.