Brickyard Healthcare - Churchman Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 68.2 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent an elopement for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement. A resident diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder bipolar type and dementia, had a history of elopement and attempted to leave the facility 12 days prior, left the facility. The resident's whereabouts were unknown for 2 days when the resident was located by a bystander. The resident was confused and physically and verbally combative with EMS (Emergency Medical Services), had to be restrained and required inpatient psychiatric treatment. (Resident B) This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on, 8/25/23 at approximately 4:30 p.m., when the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent an elopement. This resulted in a resident who left the facility without staff and the resident's whereabouts were unknown for 2 days. The [NAME] President and Director of Nursing were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 8/29/23 at 5:30 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse from a staff member related to a staff member pushing a resident to the floor after a verbal altercation, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. A facility staff member failed to react and respond to a resident's behavior appropriately and professionally, resulting in the staff member purposefully pushing the resident to the ground. (Resident B) This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on, 7/27/23 at approximately 8:00 p.m., when the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse. The Administrator, Director of Nursing, the Regional Director of Clinical Operations, Area [NAME] President, and [NAME] President were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy, on 8/22/23 at 2:15 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 8/24/23 at 11:30 a.m., and the deficient practice corrected on 8/9/23, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Finding includes: During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2023-08-24 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a behavioral health care plan that included person-centered interventions to reduce or prevent intrusive, physically violent, and verbally aggressive behaviors for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for behavioral health services. This deficient practice resulted in one resident being pulled out of bed and one resident being hit repetitively. (Resident C, Resident D, Resident E) Finding includes: During an interview on 8/21/23 at 10:22 a.m., LPN 3 (Licensed Practical Nurse) indicated Resident C was aggressive with staff and other residents. If someone looked at him, Resident C would yell or ball his fist. Resident C would get physical with other residents. Resident C was physically aggressive with Resident D. During an interview on 8/21/23 at 11:27 a.m., Administrator 2 indicated the police were called to the facility approximately 37 times, over a 4 month period, because of Resident C's behaviors. About a month ago, at the beginning of July, Resident C…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident with a contracture for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for mobility. (Resident 26) Finding includes: On 11/22/25 at 9:45 a.m., observed Resident 26 in her wheelchair. Resident 26 was self-propelling her wheelchair in the hall. Resident 26's left hand and wrist were observed to be bent toward the palm of the hand. On 11/22/25 at 11:00 a.m., the clinical record of Resident 26 was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but was not limited to, cerebral infarction and reduced mobility. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 8/28/25, indicated Resident 26 had an impairment on one side of her upper extremity including her wrist and hand. An Occupational Therapy Note, dated 12/31/24, indicated Resident 26 stated she did not want to wear the 1/4 inch foam in her left hand due to increased pain. Resident was not a candidate to wear a Carrot (a devise used to position fingers away from the palm, reducing pressure, protecting skin and keeping hands dry) or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly report all known information regarding an allegation of abuse at the time the allegation was reported to the state health department for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B, Resident C) Findings include: During an interview on 2/10/25 at 8:04 a.m., Resident B indicated a few weeks ago, Resident C was in bed and waved Resident B into Resident C's room. Resident B walked into Resident C's room, pulled his pants down and exposed himself to Resident C. During an interview on 2/10/25 at 8:17 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated, on 1/12/25, during evening shift she received a phone call from LPN 1 that Resident B was found in Resident C's room. Resident B had his pants down and was receiving oral sex from Resident C. The state health department reportable incident regarding Resident C performing oral sex on Resident B was reviewed, on 2/10/25 at 11:21 a.m. The incident indicated, on 1/12/25 at 8:10 a.m., both residents were found making inappropriate contact. The follow-up to the incident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a QMA (Qualified Medication Aide) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident D, QMA 4) Findings include: During an interview on 11/21/24 at 12:07 p.m., RN 2 indicated Resident D was hitting QMA 4 when QMA 4 picked up a chair for protection. QMA 4 then moved towards Resident D with the chair and put the chair against his neck. RN 2 told QMA 4 to stop, RN 2 notified the Director of Nursing (DON) immediately. During an interview on 11/21/24 at 12:13 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 indicated she observed Resident D become upset. Resident D had begun to yell out and was hitting the wall at that time. QMA 4 approached Resident D to take him to his room when Resident D punched QMA 4. QMA 4 backed up and grabbed a folded metal chair and physically placed it onto Resident D's upper chest just below his neck. LPN 3 yelled out to QMA 4 to stop and move away. LPN 3 then reported the incident to the DON immediately. LPN 3 indicated that all QMA 4 had to do…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a sanitary manner for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. Hair was not covered. (Dietary Manager) Findings include: On 10/16/24 from 9:08 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., observed the Dietary Manager in the kitchen food preparation area where food had been prepared for the morning meal and shipment of supplies were being put away. The Dietary Manager was observed to be lacking a hair net with hair measuring approximately one forth of an inch over the entire head. On 10/16/24 from 11:45 a.m. to 12:45 p.m., the Dietary Manager was observed in the kitchen assisting with food preparation for the noon meal. The Dietary Manager was observed to be lacking a hair net. During an interview on 10/16/24 at 12:45 p.m., the Dietary Manager indicated hair nets should be worn. During an interview on 10/17/24 at 2:58 p.m., the Regional Director for Clinical Operations indicated all kitchen staff preparing food should have been wearing hair nets. On 10/16/24 at 12:46 p.m., the Regional Director of Clinical Operations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have residents sign the appropriate consent or refusal forms for pneumococcal vaccinations upon admission for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for immunization records. (Resident 3, Resident 32, Resident 33, and Resident 44) Findings include: 1. On 10/16/24 at 10:45 a.m., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 3's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD (a lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), chronic hepatitis C (a viral infection that affects the liver), and unspecified kidney injury. On 10/17/24 at 8:30 a.m., the DON (Director of Nursing), provided a copy of Resident 3's pneumococcal vaccine consent form. A review of the form indicated it was signed as verbal from POA [Power of Attorney] and was undated. 2. On 10/16/24 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 32's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 32's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD, chronic kidney disease, and type 2 diabetes. On 10/17/24 at 8:30 a.m., the DON provided a copy of Resident 32's pneumococcal vaccine consent form. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-22 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have residents sign the appropriate consent or refusal forms for Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccinations upon admission for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for immunization records. (Resident 3, Resident 32, Resident 33, and Resident 44) Findings include: 1. On 10/16/24 at 10:45 a.m., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 3's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD (a lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), chronic hepatitis C (a viral infection that affects the liver), and unspecified kidney injury. On 10/17/24 at 8:30 a.m., the DON (Director of Nursing), provided a copy of Resident 3's Covid-19 vaccine consent form. A review of the form indicated it was signed as verbal from POA [Power of Attorney] and was undated. 2. On 10/16/24 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 32's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 32's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD, chronic kidney disease, and type 2 diabetes. On 10/17/24 at 8:30 a.m., the DON provided a copy of Resident 32's Covid-19 vaccine consent form. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a self medication administration assessment was completed for 1 of 1 residents randomly observed with medications left at bedside. Finding includes: During an observation on 10/16/24 at 9:38 a.m., Resident 30 was sitting up on the side of the bed. The following items were observed sitting on top of table in front of television: - One medication bottle of Simbrinza Ophthalmic Suspension 1-0.2%, for the treatment of glaucoma. - One medication bottle of Lantanoprost Solution 0.0005%, for the treatment of glaucoma. During an observation on 10/17/24 at 8:38 a.m., a small plastic medication cup with multiple unidentified tablets and capsules were observed sitting on the table in front of the television. During an interview at that time, Resident 30 indicated that he had to eat breakfast before he could take his medication, so the nurse left them for him. During an observation on 10/21/24 at 10:50 a.m., the following was observed sitting on top of refrigerator in Resident 30's room: - One medication bottle of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that written Notice of Transfer and Discharge was provided to the resident's representative and to the Office of the State Long-Term Ombudsman for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for written transfer and discharge notification. (Resident 31) Finding includes: On 10/17/24, at 2:00 p.m., Resident 31's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure and type 2 diabetes. The face sheet indicated Resident 31 had a resident representative. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/22/24, indicated Resident 31 was cognitively intact. The clinical record's census tab indicated Resident 31 was transferred to the hospital emergency department on 8/5/24. The Notice of Transfer or Discharge document, dated 8/5/24, indicated Resident 31 was transferred to the hospital emergency department for a facility-initiated hospital transfer on 8/5/24. Resident 31 was provided a copy of the transfer document at the time of his transfer. On 10/21/24 at 1:45 p.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 7) Finding includes: On 10/16/24 at 10:00 a.m., observed Resident 7's in bed. The bed was observed to be elevated (approximately 4 feet from the floor) and was not in the the lowest position. On 10/17/24 at 11:23 a.m., observed Resident 7's in bed. The bed was observed to be elevated (approximately 4 feet from the floor) and was not in the lowest position. On 10/21/24 at 8:45 a.m., observed Resident 7 in bed. The bed was observed to be elevated and was not in the lowest position. During an interview on 10/21/24 at 8:45 a.m., RN 4 indicated Resident 7's bed should always be in the lowest position. On 10/21/24 at 9:30 a.m., the clinical record for Resident 7 was reviewed. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dementia. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 9/11/24, indicated Resident 7 required extensive assist with bed mobility and transfers. A Care plan, dated 2/20/23, indicated Resident 7 was at risk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document the drug dispositions for 1 of 3 closed record residents reviewed. (Resident 49) Finding includes: On 10/18/24 at 10:35 a.m., the clinical record of Resident 49 was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body), hepatitis C (a viral infection that affects the liver), and acquired absence of bilateral legs above the knee. A physician's order summary report of medications, dated for active orders as of 10/14/24, included, but were not limited to: - acidophilus probiotic blend 1 mcg (microgram) for probiotic - atorvastatin calcium 20 mg (milligram) for hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in blood) - bacitracin ointment 500 unit/gm (gram) for wound care - benzocaine-menthol-zinc chloride gel 20-0.26-0.15 % for tooth pain - diazepam 5 mg for anxiety/seizures - docusate sodium 100 mg for constipation - ferrous sulfate 325 mg for iron supplementation - fluticasone propionate nasal suspension 93 mcg for nasal congestion - gabapentin 600 mg for pain - ibuprofen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$25,298 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $12,649 — penalty dated 2023-08-24
• $12,649 — penalty dated 2023-08-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $455K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN